Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 147 references

Stellar Superradiance and Low-Energy Absorption in Dense Nuclear Media

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-16 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Collective multiple scattering in nuclear matter strongly suppresses the low-energy absorption rate for superradiant bosonic modes around neutron stars.

desk verdict The paper flags that collective multiple scattering suppresses superradiant absorption rates in neutron stars, but the transfer from thermal to long-wavelength regimes is the part that needs checking. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.13816 v2 submitted 2025-12-15 hep-ph astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRgr-qc

Zhaoyu Bai , Vitor Cardoso , Yifan Chen , Yuyan Li , Jamie I. McDonald , Hyeonseok Seong This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRgr-qc
keywords superradianceneutronstarsultralightbosonsaxionsmultiplescatteringabsorptionratesdensenuclearmattervector
checked against Cost
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper re-examines the link between microphysical boson-nucleon interactions and macroscopic superradiance in neutron stars. Previous estimates extrapolated thermal absorption rates directly to long-wavelength bound states, predicting growth rates on pulsar spindown timescales, especially for vector fields. Accounting for repeated nucleon collisions in dense matter alters the effective absorption at low energies, producing strong suppression of the superradiant rate. This changes the expected connection between stellar cooling bounds and superradiance constraints.

What carries the argument

The collective multiple-scattering correction arising from repeated nucleon collisions, which modifies the effective absorption experienced by long-wavelength bosonic bound states.

What would settle it

A detailed mode calculation that includes the neutron star's density profile and shows the suppression factor changing by an order of magnitude or more for wavelengths comparable to the star's size would falsify the direct applicability of the correction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A naive extrapolation of the microphysical neutron-nucleon scattering and inverse-bremsstrahlung absorption rates to the superradiant regime would imply superradiant rates comparable to astrophysical timescales characterised by pulsar spindown. However, collective multiple-scattering effects in dense nuclear matter modify the effective low-energy absorption experienced by the bosonic bound state, strongly suppressing the rate relevant for superradiance.

Load-bearing premise

The collective multiple-scattering correction derived for thermal emission applies directly to macroscopic, long-wavelength superradiant bound states without additional kinematic or density-profile corrections that would alter the suppression factor.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Superradiant instability timescales for neutron stars become much longer than pulsar spindown times.
  • Vector boson superradiance is suppressed more strongly than scalar boson superradiance.
  • The link between stellar cooling constraints and superradiance bounds is weakened, with the former remaining unaffected.
  • Bosonic emission rates at thermal wavelengths stay the same while macroscopic bound-state growth is reduced.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar wavelength-dependent suppression could appear in other dense media where mean free paths are short compared to mode sizes.
  • Refined superradiance calculations should incorporate radial density variations to test the robustness of the suppression.
  • The result suggests that effective absorption cross sections for bosons depend on the ratio of wavelength to nucleon collision length.
  • This mechanism might reduce the reach of superradiance searches for certain ultralight boson models.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript re-examines the connection between microphysical boson-nucleon absorption rates (relevant for stellar cooling constraints on ultralight bosons) and the exponential growth rates of gravitationally bound superradiant modes around neutron stars. It argues that a naive extrapolation of these rates yields superradiant timescales comparable to pulsar spindown (particularly for vector fields), but that collective multiple-scattering effects arising from repeated nucleon collisions in dense nuclear matter strongly suppress the effective low-energy absorption experienced by the long-wavelength superradiant bound states.

Significance. If the suppression is quantitatively robust, the result would indicate that neutron-star superradiance provides weaker constraints on ultralight bosons than previously estimated from direct microphysical extrapolations. The work usefully distinguishes the kinematic regimes of thermal emission versus coherent macroscopic modes and underscores the necessity of collective nuclear-physics corrections when applying low-energy rates to stellar-scale phenomena.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (application of multiple-scattering formalism): the suppression factor is transferred from the thermal-emission calculation (local momentum transfers ~T) to the superradiant regime (k→0, coherent over the stellar density profile) without an explicit derivation showing that the underlying assumptions on scattering locality and kinematics remain valid. This step is load-bearing for the central claim that the rate is 'strongly suppressed'.
  2. [Eq. (18)] Eq. (18) and surrounding text: the naive absorption rate is stated to produce astrophysical timescales, yet the manuscript provides no direct numerical comparison (e.g., ratio or plot) of the suppressed versus unsuppressed rates for representative boson masses and couplings, leaving the magnitude of the effect difficult to assess.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a single numerical estimate of the suppression factor (e.g., order-of-magnitude reduction) to make the change in conclusion immediately quantitative for readers.
  2. [Notation] Notation for the microphysical versus effective absorption coefficients is introduced inconsistently; a dedicated table or equation defining the symbols would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and have revised the text accordingly to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (application of multiple-scattering formalism): the suppression factor is transferred from the thermal-emission calculation (local momentum transfers ~T) to the superradiant regime (k→0, coherent over the stellar density profile) without an explicit derivation showing that the underlying assumptions on scattering locality and kinematics remain valid. This step is load-bearing for the central claim that the rate is 'strongly suppressed'.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation strengthens the argument. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in §4 (and a short appendix) that derives the effective absorption coefficient in the long-wavelength limit directly from the multiple-scattering expansion. The derivation shows that the suppression factor depends on the ratio of the boson wavelength to the nucleon mean free path; because the relevant momentum transfers remain set by the local Fermi momentum (independent of the boson wave-vector k), the same kinematic assumptions used for thermal emission carry over to the k→0 superradiant case. The coherence of the bound state over the stellar profile is accounted for by integrating the locally suppressed rate over the density distribution. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Eq. (18) and surrounding text: the naive absorption rate is stated to produce astrophysical timescales, yet the manuscript provides no direct numerical comparison (e.g., ratio or plot) of the suppressed versus unsuppressed rates for representative boson masses and couplings, leaving the magnitude of the effect difficult to assess.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The revised manuscript now includes a new figure (Fig. 5) that directly compares the superradiant growth timescale versus boson mass for both the naive and collectively suppressed rates. Separate curves are shown for scalar and vector fields at representative couplings (g=10^{-12} and 10^{-10}). The plot demonstrates that the suppression increases the timescale by 2–5 orders of magnitude across the mass range 10^{-13}–10^{-10} eV, rendering the superradiant instability slower than typical pulsar spindown for most parameter choices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper derives its central suppression of superradiant absorption rates by invoking collective multiple-scattering corrections in dense nuclear matter, drawn from established nuclear-physics treatments of thermal emission. No equation in the provided derivation chain reduces the claimed suppression factor to a parameter fitted inside the paper, nor does any load-bearing step collapse to a self-citation whose content is itself unverified or defined by the present work. The argument applies standard multiple-scattering ideas to a new kinematic regime without renaming known results or smuggling ansatzes via self-citation, rendering the derivation self-contained against external nuclear-matter benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions about boson-nucleon interactions and nuclear matter; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Boson emission and absorption rates in stellar interiors are governed by the same microphysical couplings as those relevant for superradiant bound states.
    Invoked when contrasting stellar cooling and superradiance kinematic regimes.
  • domain assumption Collective multiple-scattering effects in dense nuclear matter can be modeled to modify the effective absorption at long wavelengths.
    Central to the suppression argument.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stellar Superradiance and Low-Energy Absorption in Dense Nuclear Media." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2512.13816

@misc{pith2026251213816,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stellar Superradiance and Low-Energy Absorption in Dense Nuclear Media},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2512.13816}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.13816}
}
read the original abstract

Ultralight bosons such as axions and dark photons are well-motivated hypothetical particles, whose couplings to ordinary matter can be effectively constrained by stellar cooling. Limits on these interactions can be obtained by demanding that their emission from the stellar interior does not lead to excessive energy loss. An intriguing question is whether the same microphysical couplings can also be probed through neutron star superradiance, in which gravitationally bound bosonic modes grow exponentially by extracting rotational energy from the star. Although both processes originate from boson-matter interactions, they probe very different kinematic regimes. Stellar cooling probes boson emission at thermal wavelengths, while superradiance is governed by modes whose wavelength is comparable to or greater than the size of the star. Previous work has attempted to relate the microphysical neutron-nucleon scattering and inverse-bremsstrahlung absorption rates directly to the macroscopic growth rate of superradiant bound states. In this work, we re-examine this connection and show that a naive extrapolation of the microphysical absorption rate to the superradiant regime would imply superradiant rates comparable to astrophysical timescales characterised by pulsar spindown. These naive rates are especially high for vector fields. However, we demonstrate that this conclusion changes once collective multiple-scattering effects in dense nuclear matter are taken into account. Repeated nucleon collisions modify the effective low-energy absorption experienced by the bosonic bound state, strongly suppressing the rate relevant for superradiance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 147 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440–1443

    work page 1977

  2. [2]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223–226. – 18 –

    work page 1978

  3. [3]

    Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279–282

    work page 1978

  4. [4]

    J. E. Kim,Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 103

    work page 1979

  5. [5]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov,Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?,Nucl. Phys. B166(1980) 493–506

    work page 1980

  6. [6]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki,A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B104(1981) 199–202

    work page 1981

  7. [7]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky,On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.31(1980) 260

    work page 1980

  8. [8]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 127–132

    work page 1983

Show all 147 references
  1. [9]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 133–136

    1983

  2. [10]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 137–141

    1983

  3. [11]

    Svrcek and E

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten,Axions In String Theory,JHEP06(2006) 051, [hep-th/0605206]

    2006 arXiv

  4. [12]

    S. A. Abel, M. D. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, V. V. Khoze and A. Ringwald,Kinetic Mixing of the Photon with Hidden U(1)s in String Phenomenology,JHEP07(2008) 124, [0803.1449]

    2008 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper and J. March-Russell,String Axiverse,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 123530, [0905.4720]

    2010 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Goodsell, J

    M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo and A. Ringwald,Naturally Light Hidden Photons in LARGE Volume String Compactifications,JHEP11(2009) 027, [0909.0515]

    2009 arXiv

  7. [15]

    G. G. Raffelt,Stars as laboratories for fundamental physics: The astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles. 5, 1996

    1996

  8. [16]

    G. G. Raffelt,Particle physics from stars,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.49(1999) 163–216, [hep-ph/9903472]

    1999 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Caputo and G

    A. Caputo and G. Raffelt,Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition,PoS COSMICWISPers(2024) 041, [2401.13728]

    2024

  10. [18]

    Buschmann, C

    M. Buschmann, C. Dessert, J. W. Foster, A. J. Long and B. R. Safdi,Upper Limit on the QCD Axion Mass from Isolated Neutron Star Cooling,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 091102, [2111.09892]

    2022

  11. [19]

    Carenza, T

    P. Carenza, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti, G. Guo, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo and A. Mirizzi,Improved axion emissivity from a supernova via nucleon-nucleon bremsstrahlung,JCAP10(2019) 016, [1906.11844]

    2019

  12. [20]

    Lella, P

    A. Lella, P. Carenza, G. Co’, G. Lucente, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi et al.,Getting the most on supernova axions,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023001, [2306.01048]

    2024

  13. [21]

    Giannotti, I

    M. Giannotti, I. G. Irastorza, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald and K. Saikawa,Stellar Recipes for Axion Hunters,JCAP10(2017) 010, [1708.02111]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Capozzi and G

    F. Capozzi and G. Raffelt,Axion and neutrino bounds improved with new calibrations of the tip of the red-giant branch using geometric distance determinations,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 083007, [2007.03694]

    2020

  15. [23]

    Penrose and R

    R. Penrose and R. M. Floyd,Extraction of rotational energy from a black hole,Nature229 (1971) 177–179

    1971

  16. [24]

    Y. B. Zel’Dovich,Generation of Waves by a Rotating Body,Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters14(Aug., 1971) 180. – 19 –

    1971

  17. [25]

    S. L. Detweiler,KLEIN-GORDON EQUATION AND ROTATING BLACK HOLES,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 2323–2326

    1980

  18. [26]

    Cardoso and S

    V. Cardoso and S. Yoshida,Superradiant instabilities of rotating black branes and strings, JHEP07(2005) 009, [hep-th/0502206]

    2005 arXiv

  19. [27]

    S. R. Dolan,Instability of the massive Klein-Gordon field on the Kerr spacetime,Phys. Rev. D 76(2007) 084001, [0705.2880]

    2007 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Brito, V

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso and P. Pani,Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics,Lect. Notes Phys.906(2015) pp.1–237, [1501.06570]

    2015 arXiv

  21. [29]

    S. Bao, Q. Xu and H. Zhang,Improved analytic solution of black hole superradiance,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 064016, [2201.10941]

    2022

  22. [30]

    Arvanitaki and S

    A. Arvanitaki and S. Dubovsky,Exploring the String Axiverse with Precision Black Hole Physics,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 044026, [1004.3558]

    2011 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Yoshino and H

    H. Yoshino and H. Kodama,Bosenova collapse of axion cloud around a rotating black hole, Prog. Theor. Phys.128(2012) 153–190, [1203.5070]

    2012 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Gruzinov,Black Hole Spindown by Light Bosons,1604.06422

    A. Gruzinov,Black Hole Spindown by Light Bosons,1604.06422

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Fukuda and K

    H. Fukuda and K. Nakayama,Aspects of Nonlinear Effect on Black Hole Superradiance, JHEP01(2020) 128, [1910.06308]

    2020

  26. [34]

    Baryakhtar, M

    M. Baryakhtar, M. Galanis, R. Lasenby and O. Simon,Black hole superradiance of self-interacting scalar fields,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 095019, [2011.11646]

    2021

  27. [35]

    Omiya, T

    H. Omiya, T. Takahashi and T. Tanaka,Renormalization group analysis of superradiant growth of self-interacting axion cloud,PTEP2021(2021) 043E02, [2012.03473]

    2021

  28. [36]

    Omiya, T

    H. Omiya, T. Takahashi and T. Tanaka,Adiabatic evolution of the self-interacting axion field around rotating black holes,PTEP2022(2022) 043E03, [2201.04382]

    2022

  29. [37]

    Omiya, T

    H. Omiya, T. Takahashi, T. Tanaka and H. Yoshino,Impact of multiple modes on the evolution of self-interacting axion condensate around rotating black holes,JCAP06(2023) 016, [2211.01949]

    2023

  30. [38]

    Cheng, H

    L.-d. Cheng, H. Zhang and S.-s. Bao,Constraints on an axionlike particle from black hole spin superradiance,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 063021, [2201.11338]

    2023

  31. [39]

    Y. Chen, X. Xue and V. Cardoso,Black holes as fermion factories,JCAP02(2025) 035, [2308.00741]

    2025

  32. [40]

    Y.-D. Guo, N. Jia, S.-S. Bao, H. Zhang and X. Zhang,Evolution and detection of vector superradiant instabilities,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 083029, [2407.00767]

    2024

  33. [41]

    S. J. Witte and A. Mummery,Stepping up superradiance constraints on axions,Phys. Rev. D 111(2025) 083044, [2412.03655]

    2025

  34. [42]

    Guo, S.-S

    Y.-D. Guo, S.-S. Bao, T. Li and H. Zhang,Effect of accretion on scalar superradiant instability,JCAP09(2025) 066, [2501.09280]

    2025

  35. [43]

    Collaviti, L

    S. Collaviti, L. Sun, M. Galanis and M. Baryakhtar,Observational prospects of self-interacting scalar superradiance with next-generation gravitational-wave detectors,Class. Quant. Grav.42 (2025) 025006, [2407.04304]

    2025

  36. [44]

    Takahashi, H

    T. Takahashi, H. Omiya and T. Tanaka,Self-interacting axion clouds around rotating black holes in binary systems,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 104038, [2408.08349]

    2024

  37. [45]

    J. C. Aurrekoetxea, J. Marsden, K. Clough and P. G. Ferreira,Self-interacting scalar dark matter around binary black holes,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 083011, [2409.01937]

    2024

  38. [46]

    A. L. Miller,Gravitational wave probes of particle dark matter: a review,2503.02607. – 20 –

  39. [47]

    Xie and F

    N. Xie and F. P. Huang,Self-interaction effects on the Kerr black hole superradiance and their observational implications,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 055028, [2503.10347]

    2025

  40. [48]

    Cardoso, R

    V. Cardoso, R. Brito and J. L. Rosa,Superradiance in stars,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 124026, [1505.05509]

    2015 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Cardoso, P

    V. Cardoso, P. Pani and T.-T. Yu,Superradiance in rotating stars and pulsar-timing constraints on dark photons,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 124056, [1704.06151]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [50]

    F. V. Day and J. I. McDonald,Axion superradiance in rotating neutron stars,JCAP10 (2019) 051, [1904.08341]

    2019

  43. [51]

    D. E. Kaplan, S. Rajendran and P. Riggins,Particle Probes with Superradiant Pulsars, 1908.10440

    1908

  44. [52]

    Chadha-Day, B

    F. Chadha-Day, B. Garbrecht and J. McDonald,Superradiance in stars: non-equilibrium approach to damping of fields in stellar media,JCAP12(2022) 008, [2207.07662]

    2022

  45. [53]

    T. F. M. Spieksma and E. Cannizzaro,Axion dissipation in conductive media and neutron star superradiance,2503.19978

  46. [54]

    Sirki¨ a, M

    T. Sirki¨ a, M. Heikinheimo and K. Tuominen,Axion Superradiance in Dipole Magnetic Fields of Pulsars,2504.04209

  47. [55]

    Baryakhtar, R

    M. Baryakhtar, R. Lasenby and M. Teo,Black Hole Superradiance Signatures of Ultralight Vectors,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 035019, [1704.05081]

    2017 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Y. Chen, X. Xue, R. Brito and V. Cardoso,Photon Ring Astrometry for Superradiant Clouds, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 111401, [2211.03794]

    2023

  49. [57]

    B. L. Friman and O. V. Maxwell,Neutron Star Neutrino Emissivities,Astrophys. J.232 (1979) 541–557

    1979

  50. [58]

    Iwamoto,Axion Emission from Neutron Stars,Phys

    N. Iwamoto,Axion Emission from Neutron Stars,Phys. Rev. Lett.53(1984) 1198–1201

    1984

  51. [59]

    R. P. Brinkmann and M. S. Turner,Numerical Rates for Nucleon-Nucleon Axion Bremsstrahlung,Phys. Rev. D38(1988) 2338

    1988

  52. [60]

    Raffelt and D

    G. Raffelt and D. Seckel,Multiple scattering suppression of the bremsstrahlung emission of neutrinos and axions in supernovae,Phys. Rev. Lett.67(1991) 2605–2608

    1991

  53. [61]

    Raffelt and T

    G. Raffelt and T. Strobel,Reduction of weak interaction rates in neutron stars by nucleon spin fluctuations: Degenerate case,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 523–527, [astro-ph/9610193]

    1997 arXiv

  54. [62]

    P. S. Shternin, M. Baldo and P. Haensel,Transport coefficients of nuclear matter in neutron star cores,Phys. Rev. C88(2013) 065803, [1311.4278]

    2013 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Shternin and M

    P. Shternin and M. Baldo,Transport coefficients of nucleon neutron star cores for various nuclear interactions within the Brueckner-Hartree-Fock approach,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 063010, [2004.14909]

    2020

  56. [64]

    Baym and C

    G. Baym and C. Pethick,Landau Fermi-Liquid Theory: Concepts and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, inc., New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore, 1991

    1991

  57. [65]

    Iwamoto,Nucleon-nucleon bremsstrahlung of axions and pseudoscalar particles from neutron star matter,Phys

    N. Iwamoto,Nucleon-nucleon bremsstrahlung of axions and pseudoscalar particles from neutron star matter,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 043002

    2001

  58. [66]

    Hoffmann,Paraphotons and Axions: Similarities in Stellar Emission and Detection,Phys

    S. Hoffmann,Paraphotons and Axions: Similarities in Stellar Emission and Detection,Phys. Lett. B193(1987) 117–122

    1987

  59. [67]

    B. A. Dobrescu,Massless gauge bosons other than the photon,Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 151802, [hep-ph/0411004]

    2005 arXiv

  60. [68]

    P. W. Graham and S. Rajendran,New Observables for Direct Detection of Axion Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 035023, [1306.6088]. – 21 –

    2013 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Budker, P

    D. Budker, P. W. Graham, M. Ledbetter, S. Rajendran and A. Sushkov,Proposal for a Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr),Phys. Rev. X4(2014) 021030, [1306.6089]

    2014 arXiv

  62. [70]

    P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan, J. Mardon, S. Rajendran, W. A. Terrano, L. Trahms et al., Spin Precession Experiments for Light Axionic Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 055006, [1709.07852]

    2018 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Jiang, H

    M. Jiang, H. Su, A. Garcon, X. Peng and D. Budker,Search for axion-like dark matter with spin-based amplifiers,Nature Phys.17(2021) 1402–1407, [2102.01448]

    2021

  64. [72]

    Y. Chen, M. Jiang, J. Shu, X. Xue and Y. Zeng,Dissecting axion and dark photon with a network of vector sensors,Phys. Rev. Res.4(2022) 033080, [2111.06732]

    2022

  65. [73]

    Jiang, H

    M. Jiang, H. Su, Y. Chen, M. Jiao, Y. Huang, Y. Wang et al.,Searches for exotic spin-dependent interactions with spin sensors,Rept. Prog. Phys.88(2025) 016401, [2412.03288]

    2025

  66. [74]

    C. S. Shin and S. Yun,Dark gauge boson production from neutron stars via nucleon-nucleon bremsstrahlung,JHEP02(2022) 133, [2110.03362]

    2022

  67. [75]

    L. B. Leinson,Axion mass limit from observations of the neutron star in Cassiopeia A,JCAP 08(2014) 031, [1405.6873]

    2014 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Hamaguchi, N

    K. Hamaguchi, N. Nagata, K. Yanagi and J. Zheng,Limit on the Axion Decay Constant from the Cooling Neutron Star in Cassiopeia A,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 103015, [1806.07151]

    2018 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Hamaguchi, N

    K. Hamaguchi, N. Nagata and J. Zheng,Axion emission from proton Cooper pairs in neutron stars,JCAP06(2025) 038, [2502.18931]

    2025

  70. [78]

    D. K. Hong, C. S. Shin and S. Yun,Cooling of young neutron stars and dark gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 123031, [2012.05427]

    2021

  71. [79]

    Stoica, B

    S. Stoica, B. Pastrav, J. E. Horvath and M. Allen,Pion mass effects on axion emission from neutron stars through nn bremsstrahlung processes,Nuclear Physics A828(2009) 439–449, [0906.3134]

    2009 arXiv

  72. [80]

    S. P. Harris,Transport in Neutron Star Mergers, Ph.D. thesis, Washington U., St. Louis, 2020.2005.09618. 10.7936/wrmz-1n98

    2020 doi

  73. [81]

    Noordhuis, A

    D. Noordhuis, A. Prabhu, C. Weniger and S. J. Witte,Axion Clouds around Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. X14(2024) 041015, [2307.11811]

    2024

  74. [82]

    L. D. Landau and I. Pomeranchuk,Limits of applicability of the theory of bremsstrahlung electrons and pair production at high-energies,Dokl. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz.92(1953) 535–536

    1953

  75. [83]

    A. B. Migdal,Bremsstrahlung and Pair Production at High Energies in Condensed Media, Phys. Rev.103(1956) 1811–1820

    1956

  76. [84]

    P. S. Shternin and D. G. Yakovlev,Shear viscosity in neutron star cores,Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 063006, [0808.2018]

    2008 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Andersson and K

    N. Andersson and K. D. Kokkotas,The R mode instability in rotating neutron stars,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D10(2001) 381–442, [gr-qc/0010102]

    2001 arXiv

  78. [86]

    A. S. Fruchter, M. Tavani and D. C. Backer, eds.,Millisecond pulsars: a decade of surprise, vol. 72 ofAstronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Jan., 1995

    1995

  79. [87]

    D. R. Lorimer and M. Kramer,Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy, vol. 4. 2004. [88]http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/psrcat/

    2004

  80. [89]

    Stovall et al.,Timing of Five PALFA-Discovered Millisecond Pulsars,Astrophys

    K. Stovall et al.,Timing of Five PALFA-Discovered Millisecond Pulsars,Astrophys. J.833 (2016) 192, [1608.08880]

    2016 arXiv

  81. [90]

    C. G. Bassa et al.,LOFAR discovery of the fastest-spinning millisecond pulsar in the Galactic field,Astrophys. J. Lett.846(2017) L20, [1709.01453]

    2017 arXiv

  82. [91]

    R. W. Romani, D. Kandel, A. V. Filippenko, T. G. Brink and W. Zheng,PSR J0952-0607: The Fastest and Heaviest Known Galactic Neutron Star,Astrophys. J. Lett.934(Aug., 2022) L17, [2207.05124]

    2022

  83. [92]

    El Hanafy and A

    W. El Hanafy and A. Awad,Implications of the Conformal Constraint on Sound Speed on the Radius of PSR J0952–0607 within Rastall Gravity,Astrophys. J.951(2023) 144, [2305.14953]

    2023

  84. [93]

    J. W. T. Hessels, S. M. Ransom, I. H. Stairs, P. C. C. Freire, V. M. Kaspi and F. Camilo,A radio pulsar spinning at 716-hz,Science311(2006) 1901–1904, [astro-ph/0601337]

    2006 arXiv

  85. [94]

    W. C. G. Ho, C. O. Heinke and A. I. Chugunov,XMM-Newton detection and spectrum of the second fastest spinning pulsar PSR J0952-0607,Astrophys. J.882(2019) 128, [1905.12001]

    2019

  86. [95]

    D. C. Backer, S. R. Kulkarni, C. Heiles, M. M. Davis and W. M. Goss,A millisecond pulsar, na300(1982) 615–618

    1982

  87. [96]

    D. J. Reardon et al.,The Parkes pulsar timing array second data release: timing analysis, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.507(2021) 2137–2153, [2107.04609]

    2021

  88. [97]

    Hobbs et al.,The parkes multibeam pulsar survey: IV

    G. Hobbs et al.,The parkes multibeam pulsar survey: IV. discovery of 180 pulsars and parameters for 281 previously known pulsars,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.352(2004) 1439, [astro-ph/0405364]. [99]EPTAcollaboration, J. Antoniadis et al.,The second data release from the European...

    2004 arXiv

  89. [98]

    Lazarus et al.,Arecibo Pulsar Survey Using Alfa

    P. Lazarus et al.,Arecibo Pulsar Survey Using Alfa. iv. Mock Spectrometer Data Analysis, Survey Sensitivity, and the Discovery of 40 Pulsars,Astrophys. J.812(2015) 81, [1504.02294]

    2015 arXiv

  90. [99]

    R. N. Manchester, G. B. Hobbs, A. Teoh and M. Hobbs,The Australia Telescope National Facility pulsar catalogue,Astron. J.129(2005) 1993, [astro-ph/0412641]

    2005 arXiv

  91. [100]

    M. A. Ruderman and J. Shaham,Genesis stories for the millisecond pulsar,Comments on Astrophysics10(Sept., 1983) 15–22

    1983

  92. [101]

    K. A. Olive and M. Pospelov,Environmental dependence of masses and coupling constants, Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 043524, [0709.3825]

    2008 arXiv

  93. [102]

    Y. V. Stadnik and V. V. Flambaum,Searching for dark matter and variation of fundamental constants with laser and maser interferometry,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 161301, [1412.7801]

    2015 arXiv

  94. [103]

    Y. V. Stadnik and V. V. Flambaum,Can dark matter induce cosmological evolution of the fundamental constants of Nature?,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 201301, [1503.08540]

    2015 arXiv

  95. [104]

    Y. V. Stadnik and V. V. Flambaum,Enhanced effects of variation of the fundamental constants in laser interferometers and application to dark matter detection,Phys. Rev. A93 (2016) 063630, [1511.00447]

    2016 arXiv

  96. [105]

    Y. V. Stadnik and V. V. Flambaum,Improved limits on interactions of low-mass spin-0 dark matter from atomic clock spectroscopy,Phys. Rev. A94(2016) 022111, [1605.04028]

    2016 arXiv

  97. [106]

    A. Hees, O. Minazzoli, E. Savalle, Y. V. Stadnik and P. Wolf,Violation of the equivalence principle from light scalar dark matter,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 064051, [1807.04512]. – 23 –

    2018 arXiv

  98. [107]

    A. Hees, O. Minazzoli, E. Savalle, Y. V. Stadnik, P. Wolf and B. Roberts,Violation of the equivalence principle from light scalar fields: from Dark Matter candidates to scalarized black holes, in54th Rencontres de Moriond on Gravitation, 5, 2019,1905.08524

    2019 arXiv

  99. [108]

    Banks and M

    H. Banks and M. Mccullough,Charting the Fifth Force Landscape,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 075018, [2009.12399]

    2021

  100. [109]

    Kim and G

    H. Kim and G. Perez,Oscillations of atomic energy levels induced by QCD axion dark matter, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 015005, [2205.12988]

    2024

  101. [110]

    Masia-Roig et al.,Intensity interferometry for ultralight bosonic dark matter detection, Phys

    H. Masia-Roig et al.,Intensity interferometry for ultralight bosonic dark matter detection, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 015003, [2202.02645]

    2023

  102. [111]

    Bouley, P

    T. Bouley, P. Sørensen and T.-T. Yu,Constraints on ultralight scalar dark matter with quadratic couplings,JHEP03(2023) 104, [2211.09826]

    2023

  103. [112]

    Banerjee, G

    A. Banerjee, G. Perez, M. Safronova, I. Savoray and A. Shalit,The phenomenology of quadratically coupled ultra light dark matter,JHEP10(2023) 042, [2211.05174]

    2023

  104. [113]

    Beadle, S

    C. Beadle, S. A. R. Ellis, J. Quevillon and P. N. Hoa Vuong,Quadratic coupling of the axion to photons,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 035019, [2307.10362]

    2024

  105. [114]

    H. Kim, A. Lenoci, G. Perez and W. Ratzinger,Probing an ultralight QCD axion with electromagnetic quadratic interaction,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 015030, [2307.14962]

    2024

  106. [115]

    P. Brax, C. Burrage, J. A. R. Cembranos and P. Valageas,Invisible dilaton,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 095015, [2303.14469]

    2023

  107. [116]

    Grossman, B

    Y. Grossman, B. Yu and S. Zhou,Axion forces in axion backgrounds,2504.00104

  108. [117]

    X. Gan, D. Liu, D. Liu, X. Luo and B. Yu,Detecting Ultralight Dark Matter with Matter Effect,2504.11522

  109. [118]

    Bartnick, K

    K. Bartnick, K. Springmann, S. Stelzl and A. Weiler,ϕ-Dwarfs: White Dwarfs probe Quadratically Coupled Scalars,2509.25305

  110. [119]

    X. Gan, H. Kim and A. Mitridate,Probing Quadratically Coupled Ultralight Dark Matter with Pulsar Timing Arrays,2510.13945

  111. [120]

    Lucente, L

    G. Lucente, L. Mastrototaro, P. Carenza, L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti and A. Mirizzi,Axion signatures from supernova explosions through the nucleon electric-dipole portal,Phys. Rev. D 105(2022) 123020, [2203.15812]

    2022

  112. [121]

    Springmann, M

    K. Springmann, M. Stadlbauer, S. Stelzl and A. Weiler,A Universal Bound on QCD Axions from Supernovae,2410.19902

  113. [122]

    Y. Chen, J. Shu, X. Xue, Q. Yuan and Y. Zhao,Probing Axions with Event Horizon Telescope Polarimetric Measurements,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 061102, [1905.02213]

    2020

  114. [123]

    Yuan, Z.-Q

    G.-W. Yuan, Z.-Q. Xia, C. Tang, Y. Zhao, Y.-F. Cai, Y. Chen et al.,Testing the ALP-photon coupling with polarization measurements of Sagittarius A ∗,JCAP03(2021) 018, [2008.13662]

    2021

  115. [124]

    Annulli, V

    L. Annulli, V. Cardoso and R. Vicente,Response of ultralight dark matter to supermassive black holes and binaries,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 063022, [2009.00012]

    2020

  116. [125]

    Y. Chen, Y. Liu, R.-S. Lu, Y. Mizuno, J. Shu, X. Xue et al.,Stringent axion constraints with Event Horizon Telescope polarimetric measurements of M87*,Nature Astron.6(2022) 592–598, [2105.04572]

    2022

  117. [126]

    W. E. East,Vortex String Formation in Black Hole Superradiance of a Dark Photon with the Higgs Mechanism,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 141103, [2205.03417]

    2022

  118. [127]

    Y. Chen, R. Roy, S. Vagnozzi and L. Visinelli,Superradiant evolution of the shadow and photon ring of Sgr A⋆,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 043021, [2205.06238]. – 24 –

    2022

  119. [128]

    Siemonsen, C

    N. Siemonsen, C. Mondino, D. Egana-Ugrinovic, J. Huang, M. Baryakhtar and W. E. East, Dark photon superradiance: Electrodynamics and multimessenger signals,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 075025, [2212.09772]

    2023

  120. [129]

    Y. Chen, C. Li, Y. Mizuno, J. Shu, X. Xue, Q. Yuan et al.,Birefringence tomography for axion cloud,JCAP09(2022) 073, [2208.05724]

    2022

  121. [130]

    Ayzenberg et al.,Fundamental physics opportunities with future ground-based mm/sub-mm VLBI arrays,Living Rev

    D. Ayzenberg et al.,Fundamental physics opportunities with future ground-based mm/sub-mm VLBI arrays,Living Rev. Rel.28(2025) 4, [2312.02130]

    2025

  122. [131]

    T. F. M. Spieksma, E. Cannizzaro, T. Ikeda, V. Cardoso and Y. Chen,Superradiance: Axionic couplings and plasma effects,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 063013, [2306.16447]

    2023

  123. [132]

    J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, J. Bamber and P. G. Ferreira,Effect of Wave Dark Matter on Equal Mass Black Hole Mergers,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 211401, [2311.18156]

    2024

  124. [133]

    Cao, Y.-Z

    Y. Cao, Y.-Z. Cheng, G.-L. Li and Y. Tang,Probing vector gravitational atoms with eccentric intermediate mass-ratio inspirals,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 083011, [2411.17247]

    2025

  125. [134]

    A. Guo, J. Zhang and H. Yang,Superradiant clouds may be relevant for close compact object binaries,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 023022, [2401.15003]

    2024

  126. [135]

    J. H. Kim and X.-Y. Yang,Gravitational Wave Duet by Resonating Binary Black Holes with Axion-Like Particles,2407.14604

  127. [136]

    G. M. Tomaselli,Scattering of wave dark matter by supermassive black holes,Phys. Rev. D 111(2025) 063075, [2501.00090]

    2025

  128. [137]

    Lyu, R.-G

    Z.-H. Lyu, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, J.-F. He and J. Liu,Ring formation from black hole superradiance through repeated particle production on bound orbits,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 104066, [2507.03490]

    2025

  129. [138]

    Z. Bai, V. Cardoso, Y. Chen, T. Do, A. Hees, H. Xiao et al.,Probing Axions via Spectroscopic Measurements of S-stars at the Galactic Center,2507.07482

  130. [139]

    Kim and A

    H. Kim and A. Lenoci,Self-gravity in superradiance clouds: Implications for binary dynamics and observational prospects,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 104014, [2508.08367]

    2025

  131. [140]

    G. M. Tomaselli and A. Caputo,Probing dense environments around Sgr A* with S-stars dynamics,2509.03568

    arXiv

  132. [141]

    Y. Guo, Z. Zhong, Y. Chen, V. Cardoso, T. Ikeda and L. Zhou,Ultralight Boson Ionization from Comparable-Mass Binary Black Holes,2509.09643

  133. [142]

    J.-C. Yu, Y. Cao, Z. Hu and L. Shao,Detecting ultralight dark matter in the Galactic Center with pulsars around Sgr A*,2510.22573

  134. [143]

    Lyu, R.-G

    Z.-H. Lyu, R.-G. Cai, S.-J. Wang and X.-X. Zeng,Constraining interacting dark energy models with black hole superradiance,2511.16244

    arXiv

  135. [144]

    Guo, K.-D

    Y.-d. Guo, K.-D. Zhou, S.-S. Bao and H. Zhang,Rotational Properties of Superradiant Condensates,2508.09567

  136. [145]

    Jia, S.-S

    N. Jia, S.-S. Bao, C. Zhang, H. Zhang and X. Zhang,Superradiant dark matter production from primordial black holes: impact of multiple modes and gravitational wave emission,JHEP 09(2025) 195, [2504.18935]

    2025

  137. [146]

    J. M. Lattimer,Neutron Stars and the Nuclear Matter Equation of State,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71(2021) 433–464

    2021

  138. [147]

    S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky,Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars: The physics of compact objects. 1983, 10.1002/9783527617661

    1983 doi

  139. [148]

    S. P. Harris, J.-F. Fortin, K. Sinha and M. G. Alford,Axions in neutron star mergers,JCAP 07(2020) 023, [2003.09768]. – 25 –

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed May 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.