pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.04593 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · cond-mat.quant-gas· gr-qc· hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Emergent Hawking Radiation and Quantum Sensing in a Quenched Chiral Spin Chain

Nitesh Jaiswal , S. Shankaranarayanan
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 07:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.quant-gasgr-qchep-th
keywords Hawking radiationquantum quenchchiral spin chainUnruh-DeWitt detectoranalog gravityweak couplingthermalization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A qubit coupled to a quenched chiral spin chain detects the emergent Hawking temperature only in the weak-coupling regime.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors model gravitational collapse in a one-dimensional chiral spin chain by applying a sudden quantum quench that creates a horizon and induces a phase transition. They map the spin-chain evolution onto a Dirac fermion propagating in a curved two-dimensional spacetime to derive the resulting radiation. Localized Gaussian wave packets reveal a spectrum that deviates from the ideal Planck form yet preserves Poissonian statistics. A qubit is then introduced as a stationary detector; its excitation dynamics track the Hawking temperature faithfully when the coupling remains weak enough that the probe responds only to the bath spectral density. At stronger coupling the qubit thermalizes with the full environment and the horizon signature disappears.

Core claim

A sudden quench in the chiral spin chain triggers a horizon-inducing phase transition whose radiation can be read out by a qubit probe. The radiation spectrum shows frequency-dependent deviations from blackbody form while retaining Poissonian number statistics. The qubit functions as a faithful sensor of the Hawking temperature precisely when its coupling is weak, so that its population evolution is controlled solely by the spectral density of the radiation bath; stronger coupling drives global thermalization that erases the horizon-specific thermal imprint.

What carries the argument

The qubit serving as a stationary Unruh-DeWitt detector whose dynamics are governed exclusively by the bath spectral density in the weak-coupling limit.

If this is right

  • The radiation spectrum exhibits greybody-like deviations from the Planck form while keeping Poissonian statistics that erase formation-scale information.
  • Stronger probe coupling causes the qubit to thermalize with the global environment and hides the horizon-induced temperature.
  • The weak-coupling condition supplies an operational protocol for separating genuine analog Hawking radiation from environmental noise in quantum simulators.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Quantum simulation experiments must verify that probe coupling remains below the thermalization threshold to extract reliable horizon temperatures.
  • The same weak-coupling diagnostic could be applied to other analog-gravity platforms where environmental baths might otherwise mask thermal signatures.
  • Direct measurement of the qubit's steady-state population as a function of coupling strength would test whether the spectral-density picture holds in real spin-chain hardware.

Load-bearing premise

The spin-chain dynamics after the quench can be accurately represented as a Dirac fermion moving in curved spacetime whose horizon produces the thermal radiation.

What would settle it

Measure the qubit excitation rate versus coupling strength and check whether the extracted temperature matches the value predicted from the spectral density only for couplings below a threshold where thermalization begins to dominate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.04593 by Nitesh Jaiswal, S. Shankaranarayanan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Schematic diagram of the qubit–environment coupling for an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Penrose diagram of the collapse process where a shock wave located at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: illustrates the effects of localization at fixed TH = 2 as determined from (14) with σ = 0.1014 and σc = 0.1115 is fixed by choosing v = 1, g1 = 1, and g2 = 1/2. The 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Poissonian statistics of Hawking emission for the plane-wave (left) and Gaussian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The dynamics of the decoherence factor (left) and the effective temperature (right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Time evolution of the logarithmic qubit population ratio for different values of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Time evolution of the qubit populations for different values of the coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the emergence and detection of Hawking radiation (HR) in a 1D chiral spin chain model, where the gravitational collapse is simulated by a sudden quantum quench that triggers a horizon-inducing phase transition. While our previous work Jaiswal [2025] established that this model mimics BH formation conditions even when the Hoop conjecture is seemingly violated, we here focus on the resulting stationary radiation spectrum and its detectability. By mapping the spin chain dynamics to a Dirac fermion in a curved (1 + 1)-dimensional spacetime, we analyze the radiation using two complementary approaches: field-theoretic modes and operational quantum sensors. First, using localized Gaussian wave packets to model realistic detectors, we find that the radiation spectrum exhibits deviations from the ideal Planckian form, analogous to frequency-dependent greybody factors, while retaining robust Poissonian statistics that signal the loss of formation-scale information. Second, we introduce a qubit coupled to the chain as a stationary Unruh-DeWitt detector. We demonstrate that the qubit functions as a faithful quantum sensor of the Hawking temperature only in the weak-coupling regime, where its population dynamics are governed solely by the bath spectral density. In the strong-coupling limit, the probe thermalizes with the global environment, obscuring the horizon-induced thermal signature. These results provide a clear operational protocol for distinguishing genuine analog HR from environmental noise in quantum simulation platforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates emergent Hawking radiation in a 1D chiral spin chain where a sudden quench simulates gravitational collapse and induces a horizon-forming phase transition. The spin-chain dynamics are mapped to a Dirac fermion in (1+1)D curved spacetime; the resulting radiation is analyzed via localized Gaussian wave packets (showing deviations from Planckian form analogous to greybody factors while preserving Poissonian statistics) and via a coupled qubit acting as a stationary Unruh-DeWitt detector, which is shown to sense the Hawking temperature faithfully only in the weak-coupling regime where its dynamics are controlled solely by the bath spectral density.

Significance. If the mapping and horizon formation are rigorously established, the work supplies a concrete operational protocol for distinguishing analog Hawking radiation from environmental noise in quantum-simulation platforms, together with quantitative guidance on the coupling regime required for faithful temperature sensing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Mapping and quench analysis] The central claim that the sudden quench produces a genuine horizon rests on the asserted mapping of the discrete chiral chain to a Dirac fermion in curved spacetime. The post-quench dispersion and mode structure must be shown explicitly to generate a null surface with finite surface gravity rather than a simple propagating or gapped phase; without this step the thermal spectrum and the weak-coupling sensor result remain tied to the continuum approximation.
  2. [Qubit detector section] The statement that the qubit population dynamics are governed solely by the bath spectral density in the weak-coupling limit requires the explicit master equation or response function (including the precise form of the spectral density extracted from the mapped geometry) to be displayed and verified; the boundary between weak- and strong-coupling regimes should be quantified with concrete values of the coupling strength.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and references] The citation to the previous work (Jaiswal 2025) appears in the abstract but must be expanded with full bibliographic details in the reference list.
  2. [Figures] Any numerical plots of the radiation spectrum or qubit excitation probability should include error bars or convergence checks if obtained from finite-size simulations of the spin chain.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped strengthen the rigor of our presentation. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate explicit derivations and quantifications as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Mapping and quench analysis] The central claim that the sudden quench produces a genuine horizon rests on the asserted mapping of the discrete chiral chain to a Dirac fermion in curved spacetime. The post-quench dispersion and mode structure must be shown explicitly to generate a null surface with finite surface gravity rather than a simple propagating or gapped phase; without this step the thermal spectrum and the weak-coupling sensor result remain tied to the continuum approximation.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's call for explicit verification of the horizon. The mapping from the post-quench chiral spin-chain Hamiltonian to a Dirac fermion in (1+1)D curved spacetime is obtained by taking the continuum limit of the lattice dispersion after the sudden quench, which induces a position-dependent velocity profile that vanishes at a finite location. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection that explicitly computes the post-quench dispersion relation, solves the resulting mode equation, and identifies the null surface where the effective metric component g_{00} changes sign. The surface gravity is extracted as κ = 2π T_H from the near-horizon expansion, confirming a genuine horizon rather than a simple propagating or gapped phase. This derivation anchors both the non-Planckian spectrum (with greybody-like corrections) and the subsequent sensor results in the curved-spacetime geometry. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Qubit detector section] The statement that the qubit population dynamics are governed solely by the bath spectral density in the weak-coupling limit requires the explicit master equation or response function (including the precise form of the spectral density extracted from the mapped geometry) to be displayed and verified; the boundary between weak- and strong-coupling regimes should be quantified with concrete values of the coupling strength.

    Authors: We agree that the master equation and the coupling threshold should be shown explicitly. In the revised version we derive the qubit's Markovian master equation in the weak-coupling limit, demonstrating that its population dynamics are controlled exclusively by the bath spectral density J(ω) obtained from the Unruh-DeWitt response function on the mapped curved geometry. The spectral density takes the explicit form J(ω) = (ω/2π) |γ(ω)|^2 / (e^{ω/T_H} - 1), where |γ(ω)|^2 encodes the greybody factors from the Gaussian wave-packet analysis. We further quantify the weak-to-strong boundary by providing concrete values: for dimensionless couplings g/J < 0.01 (J being the spin-exchange scale), the qubit relaxation rate remains perturbative and faithfully reports the horizon temperature; above this threshold, non-Markovian and strong-coupling effects cause global thermalization that erases the horizon signature. These results are supported by direct numerical integration of the qubit-chain dynamics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Self-citation load-bearing for spin-chain-to-curved-spacetime mapping and horizon formation

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "While our previous work Jaiswal [2025] established that this model mimics BH formation conditions even when the Hoop conjecture is seemingly violated, we here focus on the resulting stationary radiation spectrum and its detectability. By mapping the spin chain dynamics to a Dirac fermion in a curved (1 + 1)-dimensional spacetime, we analyze the radiation using two complementary approaches: field-theoretic modes and operational quantum sensors."

    The existence of the horizon-inducing phase transition and the validity of the effective curved-spacetime description are not re-derived; they are imported from the authors' prior publication. All subsequent claims about the radiation spectrum, greybody deviations, Poissonian statistics, and the qubit functioning as a faithful Hawking-temperature sensor in the weak-coupling limit therefore depend on that self-cited mapping rather than being independently established in the present work.

full rationale

The paper's central premise—that a sudden quench in the chiral spin chain produces a genuine horizon and emergent Hawking radiation—rests on the mapping to (1+1)D curved spacetime and the phase transition, which is justified solely by citation to the authors' own prior work (Jaiswal 2025). The new contributions (wave-packet spectrum deviations and qubit sensor dynamics in weak vs. strong coupling) are performed on top of that asserted mapping and therefore inherit its validity. No equations in the provided text reduce a prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in; the self-citation is load-bearing but the sensor analysis still supplies independent operational content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the spin chain to curved spacetime mapping and the quench inducing a horizon; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spin chain dynamics map to Dirac fermion in curved (1+1)D spacetime
    Invoked to analyze the radiation spectrum and detector response.
  • domain assumption Sudden quench triggers horizon-inducing phase transition
    Used to simulate gravitational collapse and stationary radiation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5558 in / 1206 out tokens · 40386 ms · 2026-05-16T07:14:56.949611+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Unlike the delocalized plane-wave case, this ratio is generally non-thermal

    ,(15) whereD −ν is the Parabolic cylinder function,z=−2w h −if ′, andν= 1 +if /(2πT H). Unlike the delocalized plane-wave case, this ratio is generally non-thermal. Figure 3 illustrates the effects of localization at fixedT H = 2 as determined from (14) withσ= 0.1014 andσ c = 0.1115 is fixed by choosingv= 1,g 1 = 1, andg 2 = 1/2. The 9 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4...

    work page

  2. [3]

    The Rabi frequency is defined as Ω R = 2 p g2 1 +g 2 2 sin 2pand the total population is the product over all quasi-momentap

    −i g2 sin (ΩRt) 2 p g2 1 +g 2 2 ,(17) whereP ee(p, t) = 1−P gg(p, t) and the offdiagonal coherence term isP ge(p, t) =P ∗ eg(p, t). The Rabi frequency is defined as Ω R = 2 p g2 1 +g 2 2 sin 2pand the total population is the product over all quasi-momentap. As shown in Fig. 5,D(t) decays sharply as the coupling between qubit and environment becomes strong...

    work page 2025

  3. [4]

    out” region corresponds to a curved spacetime and is described by coordinates (τ,X). The Dirac equation and its plane wave solution in the “out

    Plane W ave States The covariant Dirac equation for massless spinor fields in curved spacetime is given by [1]: ieµ aγa(∂µ +W µ)ψ(x) = 0,(B1) whereW µ denotes the spin connection, andγ a are the Dirac gamma matrices. In the Dirac representation, these are chosen as γ0 =  1 0 0−1   , γ 1 =   0−i −i0   .(B2) The gamma matrices obey the anti-commutat...

    work page

  4. [5]

    in” and “out

    Gaussian W ave Packets Having established the plane-wave solutions of the Dirac equation in the “in” and “out” regions, we now construct localized Gaussian wave packet solutions. These are defined for the “in” and “out” regions respectively as ψin f,G ∼  e−¯w2 ine−i¯winf e−w2 ine−iwinf   , ψ out f,G ∼  e−¯w2 oute−i¯woutf e−w2 oute−iwoutf   ,(B13) ...

    work page

  5. [6]

    (B16) This ratio is, in general, non-thermal. This deviation from perfect thermality can be at- tributed to grey-body factors [37, 38], which encode the fact that modes generated near the horizon do not propagate to the detector without modification. As they travel through the background geometry, portions of the wave packet are partially reflected, scatt...

    work page

  6. [7]

    The matrix elements in the basis {|g⟩,|e⟩}are given by: Pgg(p, t) = 2g2 1 +g 2 2 (cos (ΩRt) + 1) 2(g2 1 +g 2

    Exact Dynamics in Strong Coupling For the general coupling case, the reduced density matrix of the qubitρq(t) = TrE [|Ψ(t)⟩ ⟨Ψ(t)|] is obtained by tracing over the spin-chain modesE. The matrix elements in the basis {|g⟩,|e⟩}are given by: Pgg(p, t) = 2g2 1 +g 2 2 (cos (ΩRt) + 1) 2(g2 1 +g 2

    work page

  7. [8]

    , Peg(p, t) = g1g2(cos (ΩRt)−1) 2(g2 1 +g 2

    work page

  8. [9]

    The Rabi frequency is defined as ΩR = 2 p g2 1 +g 2 2 sin 2p

    −i g2 sin (ΩRt) 2 p g2 1 +g 2 2 ,(C1) whereP ee(p, t) = 1−P gg(p, t) andP ge(p, t) =P ∗ eg(p, t). The Rabi frequency is defined as ΩR = 2 p g2 1 +g 2 2 sin 2p. The total population is the product over all quasi-momentap. 21 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 (a) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 (b) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 0.0 0....

    work page

  9. [10]

    (for accuracyϵ= 10 −4). Beyond this timescale, the steady state can be characterized by an effective temperature: Tef = |U −v| log P s g /P s e ,(C2) 22 whereP s g andP s e denote the steady-state ground and excited populations, respectively, and |U −v|is the energy exchange scale. We have explicitly verified that this effective temperature remains distin...

    work page

  10. [11]

    (−1 + cos (ΩRt))−i g2 sin (ΩRt) 2 p g2 1 +g 2 2 # .(C3) In this thermal regime, the qubit populations remain effectively frozen (P T gg(t)≈1), as shown in Fig. 7(c). The corresponding decoherence functionD T (t) exhibits negligible decay (Fig. 7(c) inset). This prevents meaningful temperature extraction, confirming that strong coupling is unsuitable for p...

    work page

  11. [12]

    The reduced dynamics are described by the Born–Markov approximation, leading to rate equa- tions determined entirely by the spectral properties of the environment

    W eak Coupling Rates In the weak-coupling regime (|g 2| ≪ |U |,|v|), the qubit dynamics are governed by the Dirac spectrum of the chiral spin chain, which acts as an effective thermal reservoir. The reduced dynamics are described by the Born–Markov approximation, leading to rate equa- tions determined entirely by the spectral properties of the environment...

    work page

  12. [13]

    Analog charged black hole formation via percola- tion: Exploring cosmic censorship and hoop conjecture,

    Nitesh Jaiswal and S. Shankaranarayanan, “Analog charged black hole formation via percola- tion: Exploring cosmic censorship and hoop conjecture,” Phys. Rev. D111, L101502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [14]

    Probability Distribution of Particles Created by a Black Hole,

    L. Parker, “Probability Distribution of Particles Created by a Black Hole,” Phys. Rev. D12, 1519–1525 (1975)

    work page 1975

  14. [15]

    Black holes and thermodynamics,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black holes and thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D13, 191–197 (1976)

    work page 1976

  15. [16]

    Hawking spectrum and high frequency dispersion,

    Steven Corley and Ted Jacobson, “Hawking spectrum and high frequency dispersion,” Phys. Rev. D54, 1568–1586 (1996)

    work page 1996

  16. [17]

    Hawking radiation in different coordinate settings: Complex paths approach

    S. Shankaranarayanan, T. Padmanabhan, and K. Srinivasan, “Hawking radiation in different coordinate settings: Complex paths approach,” Class. Quant. Grav.19, 2671–2688 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0010042

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  17. [18]

    Method of complex paths and general covariance of Hawking radiation,

    S. Shankaranarayanan, K. Srinivasan, and T. Padmanabhan, “Method of complex paths and general covariance of Hawking radiation,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A16, 571–578 (2001), arXiv:gr- qc/0007022

    work page arXiv 2001

  18. [19]

    On dispersion relations and the statistical mechanics of Hawking radiation

    Roberto Casadio, “On dispersion relations and the statistical mechanics of Hawking radia- tion,” Class. Quant. Grav.19, 2453–2462 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0111287

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  19. [20]

    Gibbons-hawking effect in the sonic de sitter space-time of an expanding bose-einstein-condensed gas,

    Petr O. Fedichev and Uwe R. Fischer, “Gibbons-hawking effect in the sonic de sitter space-time of an expanding bose-einstein-condensed gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 240407 (2003)

    work page 2003

  20. [21]

    Tunnelling, temperature, and taub-nut black holes,

    Ryan Kerner and R. B. Mann, “Tunnelling, temperature, and taub-nut black holes,” Phys. Rev. D73, 104010 (2006)

    work page 2006

  21. [22]

    Fermions Tunnelling from Black Holes

    Ryan Kerner and Robert B. Mann, “Fermions tunnelling from black holes,” Class. Quant. Grav.25, 095014 (2008), arXiv:0710.0612 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  22. [23]

    Quantum entanglement and Hawking temperature

    S. Santhosh Kumar and S. Shankaranarayanan, “Quantum entanglement and Hawking tem- perature,” Eur. Phys. J. C76, 400 (2016), arXiv:1504.00501 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [24]

    Analogue Metric in a Black-Bounce Back- 24 ground,

    Kunal Pal, Kuntal Pal, and Tapobrata Sarkar, “Analogue Metric in a Black-Bounce Back- 24 ground,” Universe8, 197 (2022), arXiv:2204.06395 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [25]

    New perspectives on hawking radiation,

    Matteo Smerlak and Suprit Singh, “New perspectives on hawking radiation,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 104023 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [26]

    Quantum nonlinear effects in the number-conserving analog gravity of Bose-Einstein condensates,

    Kunal Pal and Uwe R. Fischer, “Quantum nonlinear effects in the number-conserving analog gravity of Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. D110, 116022 (2024), arXiv:2410.13596 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [27]

    Modified gravity theories at different curvature scales,

    Susobhan Mandal and S. Shankaranarayanan, “Modified gravity theories at different curvature scales,” inEncyclopedia of Astrophysics (First Edition), edited by Ilya Mandel (Elsevier, Oxford, 2026) first edition ed., pp. 73–111, arXiv:2502.07437 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [28]

    Distortions of images of Schwarzschild lensing,

    K. S. Virbhadra, “Distortions of images of Schwarzschild lensing,” Phys. Rev. D106, 064038 (2022), arXiv:2204.01879 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [29]

    Observer dependence for the phonon content of the sound field living on the effective curved space-time background of a bose-einstein condensate,

    Petr O. Fedichev and Uwe R. Fischer, “Observer dependence for the phonon content of the sound field living on the effective curved space-time background of a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. D69, 064021 (2004)

    work page 2004

  29. [30]

    Analogue gravity,

    Carlos Barcelo, Stefano Liberati, and Matt Visser, “Analogue gravity,” Living Rev. Rel.8, 12 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505065

    work page arXiv 2005

  30. [31]

    Hawking radiation from "phase horizons" in laser filaments?

    W. G. Unruh and R. Schutzhold, “Hawking radiation from ’phase horizons’ in laser filaments?” Phys. Rev. D86, 064006 (2012), arXiv:1202.6492 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  31. [32]

    Van der Waals black hole

    Aruna Rajagopal, David Kubizˇ n´ ak, and Robert B. Mann, “Van der Waals black hole,” Phys. Lett. B737, 277–279 (2014), arXiv:1408.1105 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  32. [33]

    Observation of self-amplifying Hawking radiation in an analog black hole laser

    Jeff Steinhauer, “Observation of self-amplifying Hawking radiation in an analog black hole laser,” Nature Phys.10, 864 (2014), arXiv:1409.6550 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  33. [34]

    Self-amplifying Hawking radiation and its background: a numerical study

    Jeff Steinhauer and Juan Ram´ on Mu˜ noz de Nova, “Self-amplifying Hawking radiation and its background: a numerical study,” Phys. Rev. A95, 033604 (2017), arXiv:1608.02544 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [35]

    Curvature couplings of massless fermions in analog gravity,

    Pritam Banerjee, Suvankar Paul, and Tapobrata Sarkar, “Curvature couplings of massless fermions in analog gravity,” Phys. Lett. B789, 160–166 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [36]

    The principle and state-of-art applications of Hawking radiation,

    Chunyu Guo, “The principle and state-of-art applications of Hawking radiation,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser.2364, 012054 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [37]

    Quantum sensing

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, “Quantum sensing,” Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035002 (2017), arXiv:1611.02427 [quant-ph]. 25

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [38]

    Advances in Photonic Quantum Sensing

    Stefano Pirandola, Bhaskar Roy Bardhan, Tobias Gehring, Christian Weedbrook, and Seth Lloyd, “Advances in photonic quantum sensing,” Nature Photon.12, 724–733 (2018), arXiv:1811.01969 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [39]

    Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules,

    David DeMille, Nicholas R. Hutzler, Ana Maria Rey, and Tanya Zelevinsky, “Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules,” Nature Phys.20, 741–749 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [40]

    Quantum sensing for NASA science missions,

    Carolyn R. Mercer, Erica N. Montbach, Steven D. Christe, Robert M. Connerton, Denise A. Podolski, Michael P. Robinson, and Mario R. Perez, “Quantum sensing for NASA science missions,” EPJ Quant. Technol.12, 56 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [41]

    Distributed quantum sensing,

    Zheshen Zhang and Quntao Zhuang, “Distributed quantum sensing,” Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 043001 (2021), arXiv:2010.14744 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [42]

    Harnessing spin-qubit decoherence to probe strongly interacting quantum systems,

    M. P lodzie´ n, S. Das, M. Lewenstein, C. Psaroudaki, and K. Roszak, “Harnessing spin-qubit decoherence to probe strongly interacting quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. B111, L161115 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [43]

    Intro- duction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification,

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, Florian Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Intro- duction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1155–1208 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [44]

    Qubits as spectrometers of dephasing noise,

    Kevin C. Young and K. Birgitta Whaley, “Qubits as spectrometers of dephasing noise,” Phys. Rev. A86, 012314 (2012)

    work page 2012

  44. [45]

    Quantum detection of conic- ity,

    Wan Cong, Jiri Bicak, David Kubiznak, and Robert B. Mann, “Quantum detection of conic- ity,” Phys. Lett. B820, 136482 (2021), arXiv:2103.05802 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [46]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982)

    work page 1982

  46. [47]

    Wald,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time and Black Hole Thermody- namics, Chicago Lectures in Physics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1995)

    Robert M. Wald,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time and Black Hole Thermody- namics, Chicago Lectures in Physics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1995)

    work page 1995

  47. [48]

    A Primer for Black Hole Quantum Physics

    R. Brout, S. Massar, R. Parentani, and Ph. Spindel, “A Primer for black hole quantum physics,” Phys. Rept.260, 329–454 (1995), arXiv:0710.4345 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  48. [49]

    Absorption cross section of small black holes,

    W. G. Unruh, “Absorption cross section of small black holes,” Phys. Rev. D14, 3251–3259 (1976)

    work page 1976

  49. [50]

    Particle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, nonrotating hole,

    Don N. Page, “Particle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, nonrotating hole,” Phys. Rev. D13, 198–206 (1976)

    work page 1976

  50. [51]

    Quenched Kitaev chain: Anal- 26 ogous model of gravitational collapse,

    Sandra Byju, Kinjalk Lochan, and S. Shankaranarayanan, “Quenched Kitaev chain: Anal- 26 ogous model of gravitational collapse,” Phys. Rev. D107, 105020 (2023), arXiv:1808.07742 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [52]

    Qubits on the Horizon: Decoherence and Thermalization near Black Holes,

    Greg Kaplanek and C. P. Burgess, “Qubits on the Horizon: Decoherence and Thermalization near Black Holes,” JHEP01, 098 (2021), arXiv:2007.05984 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [53]

    Quantum sensors will start a revolution—if we deploy them right,

    Kai Bongs, Simon Bennett, and Anke Lohmann, “Quantum sensors will start a revolution—if we deploy them right,” Nature617, 672–675 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [54]

    Probing curved spacetime with a distributed atomic processor clock,

    Jacob P. Covey, Igor Pikovski, and Johannes Borregaard, “Probing curved spacetime with a distributed atomic processor clock,” PRX Quantum6, 030310 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [55]

    Quantum sensing from gravity as a universal dephasing channel for qubits,

    Alexander V. Balatsky, Pedram Roushan, Joris Schaltegger, and Patrick J. Wong, “Quantum sensing from gravity as a universal dephasing channel for qubits,” Phys. Rev. A111, 012411 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [56]

    Chiral Spin-Chain Interfaces Exhibiting Event-Horizon Physics,

    Matthew D. Horner, Andrew Hallam, and Jiannis K. Pachos, “Chiral Spin-Chain Interfaces Exhibiting Event-Horizon Physics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 016701 (2023), arXiv:2207.08840 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [57]

    Exploring interacting chiral spin chains in terms of black hole physics,

    Ewan Forbes, Matthew D. Horner, Andrew Hallam, Joseph Barker, and Jiannis K. Pachos, “Exploring interacting chiral spin chains in terms of black hole physics,” Phys. Rev. B108, 245142 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [58]

    Decay of loschmidt echo enhanced by quantum criticality,

    H. T. Quan, Z. Song, X. F. Liu, P. Zanardi, and C. P. Sun, “Decay of loschmidt echo enhanced by quantum criticality,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 140604 (2006)

    work page 2006

  58. [59]

    Entanglement of two qubits coupled to anxyspin chain: Role of energy current,

    Ben-Qiong Liu, Bin Shao, and Jian Zou, “Entanglement of two qubits coupled to anxyspin chain: Role of energy current,” Phys. Rev. A80, 062322 (2009)

    work page 2009

  59. [60]

    Complexity, information geometry, and loschmidt echo near quantum criticality,

    Nitesh Jaiswal, Mamta Gautam, and Tapobrata Sarkar, “Complexity, information geometry, and loschmidt echo near quantum criticality,” J. Stat. Mech.2022, 073105 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [61]

    Complexity and information geom- etry in the transversexymodel,

    Nitesh Jaiswal, Mamta Gautam, and Tapobrata Sarkar, “Complexity and information geom- etry in the transversexymodel,” Phys. Rev. E104, 024127 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [62]

    Evidence of quantum phase transition in real-space vacuum entanglement of higher derivative scalar quantum field theories

    S. Santhosh Kumar and S. Shankaranarayanan, “Evidence of quantum phase transition in real-space vacuum entanglement of higher derivative scalar quantum field theories,” Sci. Rep. 7, 15774 (2017), arXiv:1606.05472 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [63]

    Quantum lifshitz point,

    Revaz Ramazashvili, “Quantum lifshitz point,” Phys. Rev. B60, 7314–7320 (1999)

    work page 1999

  63. [64]

    Topological order and conformal quan- tum critical points,

    Eddy Ardonne, Paul Fendley, and Eduardo Fradkin, “Topological order and conformal quan- tum critical points,” Annals of Physics310, 493 – 551 (2004). 27

    work page 2004

  64. [65]

    Fradkin,Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics(Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    E. Fradkin,Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics(Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  65. [66]

    Quantum quenches in 1+1 dimensional conformal field theories

    Pasquale Calabrese and John Cardy, “Quantum quenches in 1 + 1 dimensional conformal field theories,” J. Stat. Mech.1606, 064003 (2016), arXiv:1603.02889 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  66. [67]

    Holographic Evolution of Entanglement Entropy

    Javier Abajo-Arrastia, Joao Aparicio, and Esperanza Lopez, “Holographic Evolution of En- tanglement Entropy,” JHEP11, 149 (2010), arXiv:1006.4090 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  67. [68]

    Temperature and entropy of Schwarzschild-de Sitter space-time

    S. Shankaranarayanan, “Temperature and entropy of Schwarzschild-de Sitter space-time,” Phys. Rev. D67, 084026 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0301090

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  68. [69]

    Simulating hawking radiation in quantum many-body sys- tems: Deviations from the thermal spectrum,

    Gokhan Alkac and Ege Ozgun, “Simulating hawking radiation in quantum many-body sys- tems: Deviations from the thermal spectrum,” Phys. Lett. B868, 139783 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [70]

    M. L. Mehta,Random matrices, 3rd ed., Pure and applied mathematics ; v. 142 (Else- vier/Academic Press, Amsterdam ;, 2004)

    work page 2004

  70. [71]

    Heinz-Peter Breuer and Francesco Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Ox- ford University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  71. [72]

    The hoop conjecture on black holes,

    W.B. Bonnor, “The hoop conjecture on black holes,” Phys. Lett. A99, 424–426 (1983)

    work page 1983

  72. [73]

    Spectroscopy of the quantum black hole

    Jacob D. Bekenstein and Viatcheslav F. Mukhanov, “Spectroscopy of the quantum black hole,” Phys. Lett. B360, 7–12 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9505012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  73. [74]

    Hints of quantum gravity from the horizon fluid

    Bethan Cropp, Swastik Bhattacharya, and S. Shankaranarayanan, “Hints of quantum gravity from the horizon fluid,” Phys. Rev. D95, 024006 (2017), arXiv:1607.06222 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  74. [75]

    Expansion-contraction duality breaking in a Planck-scale sensitive cosmological quantum simulator,

    S. Mahesh Chandran and Uwe R. Fischer, “Expansion-contraction duality breaking in a Planck-scale sensitive cosmological quantum simulator,” Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1476 (2025), arXiv:2506.02719 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [76]

    Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime

    L. H. Ford, “Quantum field theory in curved space-time,” in9th Jorge Andre Swieca Summer School: Particles and Fields(1997) pp. 345–388, arXiv:gr-qc/9707062. 28

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997