pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.07972 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Self-resonance preheating in deformed attractor models: oscillon formation and evolution

Bao-Min Gu , Yu-Peng Zhang , Fu-Wen Shu , Yu-Xiao Liu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 06:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-th
keywords preheatingoscillonsα-attractor modelsself-resonancegravitational wavespotential featuresreheating dynamicsinflaton fragmentation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Gaussian feature in deformed α-attractor potentials produces more numerous but smaller and shorter-lived oscillons during self-resonance preheating.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how adding a Gaussian deformation to the potential of α-attractor T-models changes the process of self-resonance preheating. Linear analysis shows that the feature alters the resonance bands and Floquet exponents, while fully nonlinear lattice simulations demonstrate that the amount of gradient energy transferred during resonance stays roughly the same regardless of deformation strength. After resonance ends, however, the feature causes the inflaton condensate to break into a larger number of smaller oscillons that contain less total energy and decay faster, with both effects growing stronger for larger deformation parameters. These changes leave the low-frequency gravitational-wave spectrum largely untouched but suppress the high-frequency tail, and they already produce visible differences in the cosmic expansion rate within the simulated time window.

Core claim

In deformed α-attractor T-models that include a Gaussian feature near the potential minimum, the inflaton fragments into a larger population of smaller oscillons that store less energy and persist for shorter times than in the undeformed case; the gravitational-wave emission remains dominated by the resonance phase and is strongly suppressed once oscillons form, with the high-frequency part of the spectrum modified while the low-frequency part stays similar.

What carries the argument

The Gaussian deformation parameter h added to the α-attractor T-model potential, which shifts the shape near the minimum and thereby changes the resonance structure and subsequent oscillon dynamics.

If this is right

  • Gradient energy transfer during the resonance stage remains independent of h, but the subsequent decay of gradient energy depends strongly on h.
  • Models with nonzero h form a larger number of smaller oscillons that contain progressively less energy as |h| increases.
  • Oscillons become systematically shorter-lived once h is nonzero, with the reduction in lifetime strengthening for larger |h|.
  • Gravitational-wave emission is dominated by the resonance stage and drops sharply after oscillons form, leaving the low-frequency spectrum unchanged while suppressing the high-frequency tail.
  • Clear qualitative differences in the cosmic expansion history appear within the simulated time window even without a full reheating calculation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If oscillons in these models couple to other fields, the increased number and reduced lifetime could shift the spectrum of produced particles relative to standard attractor preheating.
  • The modified high-frequency gravitational-wave tail might become observable with future detectors tuned to higher frequencies, offering a potential signature of potential features during reheating.
  • Predictions for the final reheating temperature and the total number of post-inflationary e-folds in these models would change once the shorter oscillon lifetimes are taken into account.

Load-bearing premise

The Gaussian feature stays far from the end of inflation and the lattice simulations without external couplings or higher resolution still capture the main qualitative changes in oscillon number, size, lifetime, and expansion history.

What would settle it

Running the same lattice simulations at substantially higher resolution or with added external couplings and finding no systematic increase in oscillon number or decrease in their lifetime as the magnitude of h grows would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.07972 by Bao-Min Gu, Fu-Wen Shu, Yu-Peng Zhang, Yu-Xiao Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Plots of the deformed T-model potential for the parameters in table [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The violation of adiabatic condition for parametric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of the field evolution result obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dimensionless power spectra of scalar fluctuations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The evolution of gradient energy for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Two-dimensional snapshots of overdense objects for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The volume fraction (left), averaged physical size (middle), and number (right) of the dense objects for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The energy fraction of the dense objects (left) and the energy contained per object (right) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The gradient energy distribution. The dashed and dotted curves denote the fractions of gradient energy inside and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The oscillon lifetime estimated by the decay of gradient energy. The light solid curves show the gradient energy fraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Upper two rows: The oscillon lifetime estimated by the decay of the energy fraction of oscillons. Triangles mark the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The evolution of the EoS (left) and the scale factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The GW spectrum at production and at present day for selected models. To obtain the present-day gravitational [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. The plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. The Floquet charts showing the instability bands of the deformed T-model for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Evolution of the fluctuations, corresponding to the parameter sets [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. The gradient energy fraction for the T-model ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

It is well known that, in potentials that are quadratic near the minimum but shallower away, such as small $\alpha$ ($\ll M_P^2$) attractors, the inflaton condensate fragments into localized compact objects known as oscillons during self-resonance preheating. In this work we investigate the self-resonance in deformed $\alpha$-attractor T-model with a Gaussian feature near the minimum, distant from inflation's end. Linear analysis reveals altered resonance bands and deformed Floquet charts dependent on feature parameters. In fully nonlinear lattice simulations, we find that the gradient energy transfer is largely independent of the potential feature parameter $h$. In contrast, after resonance terminates, the subsequent evolution of gradient energy becomes strongly dependent on $h$. Statistical analysis reveals that models with the potential feature produce larger number of smaller oscillons, with a reduced energy stored in these objects, increasingly suppressed as the magnitude of $h$ grows. By tracking the total energy and the gradient energy contained in oscillons, we find that in models with nonzero $h$ oscillons are systematically shorter-lived, with this effect strengthening for larger $h$. The gravitational wave emission is dominated by the resonance stage and is strongly suppressed once oscillons form. Potential features leave the low-frequency spectrum largely unchanged but significantly modify the high-frequency tail. Although a complete reheating description requires external couplings and higher-resolution simulations, clear qualitative differences of cosmic expansion history already emerge within our simulated time window. These results highlight the important role of potential features in shaping reheating dynamics and their cosmological implications, and provide a deeper understanding of preheating dynamics and the properties of oscillons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates self-resonance preheating in deformed α-attractor T-models with a Gaussian potential feature near the minimum, parameterized by h. Linear Floquet analysis reveals modified resonance bands. Fully nonlinear lattice simulations show gradient energy transfer during resonance is largely independent of h, but post-resonance evolution depends on h: models with the feature yield more numerous smaller oscillons storing less energy (suppressed with growing |h|), and these oscillons have shorter lifetimes that decrease further with larger |h|. Gravitational wave emission is resonance-dominated, with the feature modifying the high-frequency tail. The authors conclude that qualitative differences in cosmic expansion history appear within the simulated window despite omitted external couplings.

Significance. If the reported h-dependent trends in oscillon statistics, energy partitioning, and lifetimes are robust, the work would meaningfully advance understanding of how small potential deformations affect preheating, oscillon formation, and gravitational wave production in inflationary models. The combination of Floquet analysis with lattice simulations is appropriate and highlights the role of features distant from the inflationary plateau in shaping reheating dynamics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Lattice simulations] Lattice simulations section: No convergence tests, resolution studies, or box-size checks are reported for the lattice parameters used to extract oscillon number, size, energy fraction, and lifetimes. Since these quantities are extracted via post-processing and are sensitive to numerical dissipation and grid artifacts, the quantitative h-dependence claims in the abstract and results rest on an unverified assumption and require explicit verification.
  2. [Abstract and Conclusions] Abstract and conclusions: The assertion that 'clear qualitative differences of cosmic expansion history already emerge within our simulated time window' is not supported by any quantitative metrics (e.g., evolution of the scale factor, Hubble parameter, or energy density components) comparing different h values. Without such evidence, the claim that the simulated interval suffices to demonstrate cosmological implications remains unsubstantiated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly list the h values corresponding to each curve or panel to improve readability of the oscillon and GW spectra results.
  2. [Introduction] The introduction should provide a quantitative estimate (e.g., field value or number of e-folds) confirming that the Gaussian feature remains sufficiently distant from the end of inflation so as not to affect the inflationary dynamics itself.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions that will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Lattice simulations section: No convergence tests, resolution studies, or box-size checks are reported for the lattice parameters used to extract oscillon number, size, energy fraction, and lifetimes. Since these quantities are extracted via post-processing and are sensitive to numerical dissipation and grid artifacts, the quantitative h-dependence claims in the abstract and results rest on an unverified assumption and require explicit verification.

    Authors: We agree that convergence tests are essential to substantiate the robustness of the extracted oscillon statistics. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit resolution studies (including runs at doubled grid resolution) and box-size checks, together with a brief discussion of how these confirm that the reported h-dependent trends in oscillon number, size, energy fraction and lifetimes are insensitive to numerical artifacts. These tests will appear in the Lattice simulations section or a new appendix. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Abstract and conclusions: The assertion that 'clear qualitative differences of cosmic expansion history already emerge within our simulated time window' is not supported by any quantitative metrics (e.g., evolution of the scale factor, Hubble parameter, or energy density components) comparing different h values. Without such evidence, the claim that the simulated interval suffices to demonstrate cosmological implications remains unsubstantiated.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the statement would be strengthened by direct quantitative support. While the energy-partitioning figures already indicate h-dependent differences that affect the expansion rate, we will add explicit comparisons of the scale-factor evolution a(t) and Hubble parameter H(t) for representative h values in the revised manuscript. These plots will be placed in the results section to substantiate the qualitative differences observed within the simulated window. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on direct lattice integration and linear Floquet analysis

full rationale

The paper derives its results on resonance bands, oscillon statistics, energy partitioning, lifetimes, and gravitational-wave spectra from linear stability analysis (Floquet charts) followed by fully nonlinear lattice simulations of the Klein-Gordon equation. No analytical step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation chain carries the central claim, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The authors explicitly note that external couplings and higher resolution are needed for a complete reheating picture, yet the reported h-dependent qualitative trends are extracted from the simulated window without self-referential closure. This yields a minor (score-1) finding consistent with direct numerical work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard single-field inflationary dynamics plus numerical evolution of a deformed potential whose only new ingredient is the Gaussian feature amplitude h; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • h
    Amplitude of the Gaussian feature added to the potential near the minimum; controls the strength of the deformation and is varied to produce the reported trends.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of single-field slow-roll inflation and subsequent self-resonance preheating in a flat FLRW background
    Invoked throughout the linear Floquet analysis and nonlinear lattice simulations described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5609 in / 1353 out tokens · 36505 ms · 2026-05-16T06:19:44.535893+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 146 canonical work pages · 61 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    gradient energy Now let us analyze the energy transfer in preheating. During the period of self-resonance, the inflaton transfers energy to its own fluctuations, leading to their amplifica- tion and the formation of a spatially anisotropic energy distribution. As an example, we show the fraction of the volume averaged gradient energy in figure 6. We see t...

    work page

  2. [2]

    During resonance, a significant fraction of the inflaton field energy is transferred into the fluctuations, leading to highly anisotropic spatial distri- bution of energy

    Properties of oscillons It is well known that the gradient energy plays a crucial role in oscillon formation. During resonance, a significant fraction of the inflaton field energy is transferred into the fluctuations, leading to highly anisotropic spatial distri- bution of energy. After the resonance ends, provided that the potential has an appropriate sh...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Morphology and number We show the volume fraction, the averaged physical size, and the number of the overdense objects in fig- ure 8. During the resonance stage, the energy of the homogeneous mode of the inflaton is continuously trans- ferred into gradient energy, leading to a steady growth of the volume fraction of overdense regions. At the end of resona...

    work page

  4. [4]

    e”, “*”, and “0

    Energy and lifetime Perhaps the most important properties of oscillons are their energy and lifetime. The total energy fraction of the overdense objects and the averaged energy contained per object are shown in figure 9. Only part of the os- cillon energy is inherited from the resonance stage. At the end of resonance, dense objects contain 16% of the tota...

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Appendix B: Derivation of the Floquet exponent We compute the Floquet exponent following the pro- cedure outlined in [25]

    and V0 = 1.14×10 −14M4 P , yieldingn s = 0.965 andN tot ≃57. Appendix B: Derivation of the Floquet exponent We compute the Floquet exponent following the pro- cedure outlined in [25]. We first recast equation (14) into a first-order formalism, ˙x(t) =U(t)x(t), U(t) = 0 1 −k2 −V ′′(ϕ(t)) 0 ! , (B1) wherex(t) = [δϕ k, δπk]T withδπ k =δ ˙ϕk. Next, we need to...

    work page

  6. [6]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B91, 99 (1980)

    work page 1980

  7. [7]

    A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D23, 347 (1981)

    work page 1981

  8. [8]

    A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B108, 389 (1982)

    work page 1982

  9. [9]

    Albrecht and P

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1220 (1982)

    work page 1982

  10. [10]

    A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B129, 177 (1983)

    work page 1983

  11. [11]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\Lambda$CDM Parameters

    T. Louiset al.(Atacama Cosmology Telescope), JCAP 11, 062, arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models

    E. Calabreseet al.(Atacama Cosmology Telescope), JCAP11, 063, arXiv:2503.14454 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    L. F. Abbott, E. Farhi, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B 117, 29 (1982)

    work page 1982

  16. [16]

    A. D. Dolgov and D. P. Kirilova, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.51, 172 (1990)

    work page 1990

  17. [17]

    J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D 42, 2491 (1990)

    work page 1990

  18. [18]

    Non-Equilibrium Evolution of Scalar Fields in FRW Cosmologies I

    D. Boyanovsky, H. J. de Vega, and R. Holman, Phys. Rev. D49, 2769 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9310319

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  19. [19]

    Boyanovsky, H

    D. Boyanovsky, H. J. de Vega, R. Holman, D. S. Lee, and A. Singh, Phys. Rev. D51, 4419 (1995), arXiv:hep- ph/9408214

    work page arXiv 1995

  20. [20]

    Reheating after Inflation

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 3195 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9405187 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  21. [21]

    Universe Reheating after Inflation

    Y. Shtanov, J. H. Traschen, and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev.D51, 5438 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9407247 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  22. [22]

    Towards the Theory of Reheating After Inflation

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D56, 3258 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9704452

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  23. [23]

    Gleiser, Phys

    M. Gleiser, Phys. Rev. D49, 2978 (1994), arXiv:hep- ph/9308279

    work page arXiv 1994

  24. [24]

    M. A. Amin, (2010), arXiv:1006.3075 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    M. A. Amin, R. Easther, and H. Finkel, JCAP12, 001, arXiv:1009.2505 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    M. A. Amin, R. Easther, H. Finkel, R. Flauger, and M. P. Hertzberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 241302 (2012), arXiv:1106.3335 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    B. A. Bassett, S. Tsujikawa, and D. Wands, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 537 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0507632 [astro- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  28. [28]

    Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: Theory and Applications

    R. Allahverdi, R. Brandenberger, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, and A. Mazumdar, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60, 27 (2010), arXiv:1001.2600 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  29. [29]

    K. D. Lozanov, (2019), arXiv:1907.04402 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    M. A. Amin, M. P. Hertzberg, D. I. Kaiser, and J. Karouby, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, 1530003 (2014), arXiv:1410.3808 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  31. [31]

    X.-X. Kou, C. Tian, and S.-Y. Zhou, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 045005 (2021), arXiv:1912.09658 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, and F. Muia, Phys. Rev. D108, 023501 (2023), arXiv:2304.01673 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    S.-Y. Zhou, E. J. Copeland, R. Easther, H. Finkel, Z.-G. Mou, and P. M. Saffin, JHEP10, 026, arXiv:1304.6094 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    D. G. Levkov and V. E. Maslov, Phys. Rev. D108, 063514 (2023), arXiv:2306.06171 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    T. Jia, Y. Sang, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D111, 083531 (2025), arXiv:2409.04046 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Gravitational Waves from Oscillons with Cuspy Potentials

    J. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai, and G. Shiu, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 031301 (2018), arXiv:1707.09841 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    Oscillons from String Moduli

    S. Antusch, F. Cefala, S. Krippendorf, F. Muia, S. Orani, and F. Quevedo, JHEP01, 083, arXiv:1708.08922 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Kasuya, M

    S. Kasuya, M. Kawasaki, F. Otani, and E. Sonomoto, Phys. Rev. D102, 043016 (2020), arXiv:2001.02582 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    K. D. Lozanov and M. A. Amin, Phys. Rev. D97, 023533 (2018), arXiv:1710.06851 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Zhang, JCAP03, 102, arXiv:2011.11720 [hep-th]

    H.-Y. Zhang, JCAP03, 102, arXiv:2011.11720 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2011

  41. [41]

    Mahbub and S

    R. Mahbub and S. S. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D108, 063524 (2023), arXiv:2303.07503 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Shafi, E

    M. Shafi, E. J. Copeland, R. Mahbub, S. S. Mishra, and S. Basak, JCAP10, 082, arXiv:2406.00108 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Impact of other scalar fields on oscillons after hilltop inflation

    S. Antusch and S. Orani, JCAP03, 026, arXiv:1511.02336 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Antusch, F

    S. Antusch, F. Cefal` a, and F. Torrent´ ı, JCAP10, 002, arXiv:1907.00611 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1907

  45. [45]

    M. A. Amin, Phys. Rev. D87, 123505 (2013), arXiv:1303.1102 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  46. [46]

    Sang and Q.-G

    Y. Sang and Q.-G. Huang, Phys. Lett. B823, 136781 (2021), arXiv:2012.14697 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    K. D. Lozanov and M. A. Amin, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 061301 (2017), arXiv:1608.01213 [astro-ph.CO]. 22

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    Antusch, D

    S. Antusch, D. G. Figueroa, K. Marschall, and F. Torrenti, Phys. Lett. B811, 135888 (2020), arXiv:2005.07563 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    A. K. Soman, S. S. Mishra, M. Shafi, and S. Basak, Phys. Rev. D112, 103521 (2025), arXiv:2407.07956 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Equation of state during (p)reheating with trilinear interactions

    S. Antusch, K. Marschall, and F. Torrenti, JCAP11, 002, arXiv:2507.13465 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    What can we learn from the stochastic gravitational wave background produced by oscillons?

    S. Antusch, F. Cefala, and S. Orani, JCAP03, 032, arXiv:1712.03231 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    D. G. Figueroa and F. Torrenti, JCAP10, 057, arXiv:1707.04533 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    Gravitational wave production after inflation with cuspy potentials

    J. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai, and G. Shiu, Phys. Rev. D99, 103506 (2019), arXiv:1812.09235 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    M. A. Amin, J. Braden, E. J. Copeland, J. T. Giblin, C. Solorio, Z. J. Weiner, and S.-Y. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 98, 024040 (2018), arXiv:1803.08047 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    K. D. Lozanov and M. A. Amin, Phys. Rev. D99, 123504 (2019), arXiv:1902.06736 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Sang and Q.-G

    Y. Sang and Q.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. D100, 063516 (2019), arXiv:1905.00371 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    J. Li, H. Yu, and P. Wu, Phys. Rev. D102, 083522 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Hiramatsu, E

    T. Hiramatsu, E. I. Sfakianakis, and M. Yamaguchi, JHEP03, 021, arXiv:2011.12201 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    X.-X. Kou, J. B. Mertens, C. Tian, and S.-Y. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D105, 123505 (2022), arXiv:2112.07626 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    Krajewski and K

    T. Krajewski and K. Turzy´ nski, JCAP10, 005, arXiv:2204.12909 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  61. [61]

    K. D. Lozanov and V. Takhistov, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 181002 (2023), arXiv:2204.07152 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    X.-B. Sui, J. Liu, and R.-G. Cai, Phys. Rev. D111, 123503 (2025), arXiv:2412.08057 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Primordial Black Holes from Inflaton Fragmentation into Oscillons

    E. Cotner, A. Kusenko, and V. Takhistov, Phys. Rev. D98, 083513 (2018), arXiv:1801.03321 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    Cotner, A

    E. Cotner, A. Kusenko, M. Sasaki, and V. Takhistov, JCAP10, 077, arXiv:1907.10613 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 1907

  65. [65]

    F. Muia, M. Cicoli, K. Clough, F. Pedro, F. Quevedo, and G. P. Vacca, JCAP07, 044, arXiv:1906.09346 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 1906

  66. [66]

    Nazari, M

    Z. Nazari, M. Cicoli, K. Clough, and F. Muia, JCAP 05, 027, arXiv:2010.05933 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2010

  67. [67]

    L. E. Padilla, J. C. Hidalgo, T. D. Gomez-Aguilar, K. A. Malik, and G. German, Front. Astron. Space Sci.11, 1361399 (2024), arXiv:2402.03542 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Kasai and N

    K. Kasai and N. Kitajima, (2025), arXiv:2510.25300 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    M. A. G. Garcia, M. Pierre, and S. Verner, Phys. Rev. D107, 043530 (2023), arXiv:2206.08940 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    van Dissel, O

    F. van Dissel, O. Pujolas, and E. I. Sfakianakis, JHEP07, 194, [Erratum: JHEP 04, 191 (2025)], arXiv:2303.16072 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Oscillons in Scalar Field Theories: Applications in Higher Dimensions and Inflation

    M. Gleiser, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D16, 219 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0602187

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  72. [72]

    Fodor,A review on radiation of oscillons and os- cillatons, Ph.D

    G. Fodor,A review on radiation of oscillons and os- cillatons, Ph.D. thesis, Wigner RCP, Budapest (2019), arXiv:1911.03340 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    Oll´ e Aguilera,On the Longevity, Quantum Decay and the role of Oscillons in Dark Matter, Ph.D

    J. Oll´ e Aguilera,On the Longevity, Quantum Decay and the role of Oscillons in Dark Matter, Ph.D. thesis, Barcelona, Autonoma U. (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    Zhou, Rept

    S.-Y. Zhou, Rept. Prog. Phys.88, 046901 (2025), arXiv:2411.16604 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Analytical Characterization of Oscillon Energy and Lifetime

    M. Gleiser and D. Sicilia, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 011602 (2008), arXiv:0804.0791 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  76. [76]

    Computation of the radiation amplitude of oscillons

    G. Fodor, P. Forgacs, Z. Horvath, and M. Mezei, Phys. Rev. D79, 065002 (2009), arXiv:0812.1919 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  77. [77]

    A General Theory of Oscillon Dynamics

    M. Gleiser and D. Sicilia, Phys. Rev.D80, 125037 (2009), arXiv:0910.5922 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  78. [78]

    M. P. Hertzberg, Phys. Rev. D82, 045022 (2010), arXiv:1003.3459 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  79. [79]

    On Longevity of I-ball/Oscillon

    K. Mukaida, M. Takimoto, and M. Yamada, JHEP03, 122, arXiv:1612.07750 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    M. Ibe, M. Kawasaki, W. Nakano, and E. Sonomoto, JHEP04, 030, arXiv:1901.06130 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

Showing first 80 references.