pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.09100 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-09 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-ph· quant-ph

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Area Scaling of Dynamical Degrees of Freedom in Regularised Scalar Field Theory

Oliver Friedrich , Kristina Giesel , Varun Kushwaha
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 05:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-phquant-ph
keywords scalar field theoryarea scalingsymplectic reductionnormal modesHamiltonian dynamicsdegrees of freedomregularisationphase space
0
0 comments X

The pith

For a regularised scalar field the minimal number of dynamical degrees of freedom scales with area rather than volume.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how many independent canonical degrees of freedom a UV/IR-regularised classical scalar field actually uses during Hamiltonian evolution. It applies symplectic model order reduction to identify the smallest symplectic dimension that can reproduce a single phase-space trajectory with an autonomous Hamiltonian system. For the free field this dimension is set by the number of distinct normal-mode frequencies below the ultraviolet cutoff instead of the total number of discretised field variables. This produces area-type scaling with region size in flat space, with mild modifications from curvature, and the pattern persists in weakly interacting lambda phi to the four theory over quasi-integrable intervals. The reduced system further decomposes into independent oscillator blocks whose linear combinations generate apparent field modes governed by a projector in their Poisson brackets.

Core claim

For the free scalar field the minimal symplectic dimension required to reproduce a single autonomous Hamiltonian trajectory is controlled not by the volume-extensive number of discretised field variables but by the much smaller number of distinct normal-mode frequencies below the ultraviolet cutoff. In flat space this leads to an area-type scaling with the size of the region up to slowly varying corrections. On geodesic balls in maximally symmetric curved spaces positive curvature induces mild super-area growth while negative curvature suppresses the scaling with the flat result recovered smoothly in the small-curvature limit. The reduced dynamics decomposes into independent oscillatorblocks

What carries the argument

Symplectic model order reduction applied to phase-space dynamics of the regularised field, which extracts the minimal symplectic subspace able to embed and reproduce a given Hamiltonian trajectory.

If this is right

  • The effective number of dynamical degrees of freedom scales with the surface area of the region in flat space.
  • Positive spatial curvature produces mild super-area growth while negative curvature produces sub-area scaling.
  • The reduced dynamics consists of independent oscillator blocks.
  • Linear combinations of these blocks produce a larger family of apparent field modes whose Poisson brackets are controlled by a projector.
  • The area-type scaling persists in weakly interacting lambda phi to the four theory over quasi-integrable time scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Area scaling of effective degrees of freedom can arise from purely classical Hamiltonian dynamics without any reference to quantum mechanics or holography.
  • Overlapping degrees of freedom can emerge dynamically from the structure of the reduced flow rather than from manual changes to canonical brackets.
  • The same diagnostic could be applied to gauge fields or gravity to test whether area scaling appears in those settings before quantisation.
  • Longer-time numerical runs in the interacting theory would show whether the scaling survives once the dynamics becomes strongly chaotic.

Load-bearing premise

Symplectic model order reduction applied to the phase-space dynamics of the regularised field accurately identifies the minimal symplectic dimension required to reproduce a single autonomous Hamiltonian trajectory.

What would settle it

A direct computation showing that the minimal symplectic dimension required for large regions grows linearly with volume instead of area would disprove the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.09100 by Kristina Giesel, Oliver Friedrich, Varun Kushwaha.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Relative projection error versus reduced dimension for the scalar field, extracted from trajectories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Verification of the three–square counting estimate. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Validation of the analytic construction of the symplectic basis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Nonlinearity budget [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Fractional frequency shift [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

How many canonical degrees of freedom does a quantum field theory actually use during its Hamiltonian evolution? For a UV/IR-regularised classical scalar field, we address this question directly at the level of phase-space dynamics by identifying the minimal symplectic dimension required to reproduce a single trajectory by an autonomous Hamiltonian system. Using symplectic model order reduction as a structure-preserving diagnostic, we show that for the free scalar field this minimal dimension is controlled not by the volume-extensive number of discretised field variables, but by the much smaller number of distinct normal-mode frequencies below the ultraviolet cutoff. In flat space, this leads to an area-type scaling with the size of the region, up to slowly varying corrections. On geodesic balls in maximally symmetric curved spaces, positive curvature induces mild super-area growth, while negative curvature suppresses the scaling, with the flat result recovered smoothly in the small-curvature limit. Numerical experiments further indicate that this behaviour persists in weakly interacting $\lambda\phi^4$ theory over quasi-integrable time scales. Beyond counting, the reduced dynamics exhibits a distinctive internal structure: it decomposes into independent oscillator blocks, while linear combinations of these blocks generate a larger family of apparent field modes whose Poisson brackets are governed by a projector rather than the identity. This reveals a purely classical and dynamical mechanism by which overlapping degrees of freedom arise, without modifying canonical structures by hand. Our results provide a controlled field-theoretic setting in which area-type scaling and overlap phenomena can be studied prior to quantisation, helping to identify which aspects of such structures--often discussed in holographic contexts--can already arise from classical Hamiltonian dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses symplectic model order reduction on the phase-space dynamics of a UV/IR-regularised classical scalar field to identify the minimal symplectic dimension needed to reproduce a single autonomous Hamiltonian trajectory. For the free field this dimension is controlled by the number of distinct normal-mode frequencies below the cutoff rather than the volume-extensive number of discretised variables, producing area scaling (with slow corrections) in flat space, mild super-area growth on positively curved geodesic balls, suppression on negatively curved ones, and recovery of the flat result in the small-curvature limit. The same scaling persists in weakly coupled λφ⁴ theory on quasi-integrable timescales. The reduced dynamics decomposes into independent oscillator blocks whose linear combinations generate apparent field modes whose Poisson brackets are governed by a projector.

Significance. If the numerical identification holds, the work supplies a purely classical, structure-preserving mechanism for area-law scaling of dynamical degrees of freedom and for the emergence of overlapping modes without ad-hoc modification of canonical brackets. This furnishes a controlled pre-quantisation setting in which phenomena often invoked in holographic discussions can be isolated and tested. The symplectic MOR diagnostic and the explicit block decomposition are methodological strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the central claim paragraph: the assertion that symplectic MOR recovers exactly twice the number of distinct frequencies (rather than an upper bound set by integration time, tolerance, or near-degeneracies) is load-bearing for the area-scaling result, yet the manuscript supplies no analytic proof or rigorous bound that the reduction procedure yields the information-theoretically minimal dimension.
  2. [Numerical experiments] Numerical experiments section: the reported persistence in weakly interacting λφ⁴ theory and the quantitative area scaling lack explicit error bars, convergence tests with respect to integration time or tolerance, and direct validation against the free-field expectation of 2×N_freq; without these the scaling claims remain difficult to assess for robustness.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Reduced dynamics] Clarify the precise definition of the projector that governs the Poisson brackets of the apparent field modes and provide an explicit equation relating it to the reduced symplectic structure.
  2. [Figures] Figures showing scaling should include a direct comparison to volume scaling and state the range of region sizes and cutoff values employed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful reading and for identifying points that will improve the clarity and robustness of the manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the central claim paragraph: the assertion that symplectic MOR recovers exactly twice the number of distinct frequencies (rather than an upper bound set by integration time, tolerance, or near-degeneracies) is load-bearing for the area-scaling result, yet the manuscript supplies no analytic proof or rigorous bound that the reduction procedure yields the information-theoretically minimal dimension.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript presents the recovered dimension as matching twice the number of distinct frequencies, based on numerical observation rather than a rigorous analytic bound. The symplectic MOR procedure returns the smallest dimension that reproduces the trajectory to within the chosen tolerance over the integration interval. In the revision we will rephrase the abstract and central claims to state that the minimal symplectic dimension equals 2×N_freq within numerical precision for the tolerances and times employed, and we will add an explicit discussion of how the count depends on integration time and tolerance (showing stabilization for sufficiently long times and tight tolerances). A full analytic proof that the procedure yields the information-theoretically minimal dimension is not currently available and would require a separate mathematical analysis of the algorithm applied to this Hamiltonian system. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Numerical experiments] Numerical experiments section: the reported persistence in weakly interacting λφ⁴ theory and the quantitative area scaling lack explicit error bars, convergence tests with respect to integration time or tolerance, and direct validation against the free-field expectation of 2×N_freq; without these the scaling claims remain difficult to assess for robustness.

    Authors: We accept that the numerical results require additional validation. In the revised manuscript we will add error bars to the scaling plots, obtained from ensembles of independent trajectories with randomized initial conditions. We will include convergence tests demonstrating that the identified dimension stabilizes once the integration time exceeds a threshold and the tolerance is tightened below a given value. We will also insert a direct comparison in the free-field case confirming that the reduced dimension matches 2×N_freq to within 1% for the parameters used. These changes will be placed in the Numerical experiments section. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Absence of an analytic proof or rigorous bound establishing that the symplectic MOR procedure yields the information-theoretically minimal dimension.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: minimal dimension obtained via independent numerical reduction, not forced by frequency count or self-definition

full rationale

The central claim identifies the minimal symplectic dimension via symplectic model order reduction applied to the phase-space dynamics, then observes that this dimension equals twice the number of distinct normal-mode frequencies below the UV cutoff (an external input fixed by the regularization and discretization). The reduction is a structure-preserving diagnostic applied to trajectories, not a definitional or fitting step that presupposes the frequency count. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatze smuggled via prior work, or renamings of known results appear in the derivation chain. The area scaling follows from the independent frequency enumeration in flat and curved spaces, with the reduction serving only to confirm the count numerically rather than to generate it by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of classical Hamiltonian mechanics and symplectic geometry together with the existence of a well-defined ultraviolet cutoff; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Symplectic geometry and autonomous Hamiltonian dynamics on phase space
    Invoked as the foundation for identifying minimal symplectic dimension via model order reduction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5596 in / 1322 out tokens · 23956 ms · 2026-05-16T05:09:07.116846+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    the minimal symplectic dimension is controlled not by the volume-extensive number of discretised field variables, but by the much smaller number of distinct normal-mode frequencies below the ultraviolet cutoff. In flat space, this leads to an area-type scaling

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity

    Gerard ’t Hooft. Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity. In Salamfest 1993:0284-296, pages 0284–296, 1993

    work page 1993

  2. [2]

    The world as a hologram

    Leonard Susskind. The world as a hologram. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 36(11):6377–6396, November

    work page

  3. [3]

    doi:10.1063/1.531249

    work page doi:10.1063/1.531249

  4. [4]

    A covariant entropy conjecture

    Raphael Bousso. A covariant entropy conjecture. Journal of High Energy Physics, 1999(7):004, July 1999. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/1999/07/004

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/07/004 1999

  5. [5]

    Holography in general space-times

    Raphael Bousso. Holography in general space-times. Journal of High Energy Physics , 1999(6):028, June 1999. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/06/028

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/06/028 1999

  6. [6]

    Proof of a quantum bousso bound

    Raphael Bousso, Horacio Casini, Zachary Fisher, and Juan Maldacena. Proof of a quantum bousso bound. Physical Review D, 90(4), August 2014. ISSN 1550-2368. doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.044002. URL http://dx. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.044002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.044002 2014

  7. [7]

    Holography and Cosmology

    W. Fischler and L. Susskind. Holography and Cosmology. arXiv e-prints, art. hep-th/9806039, June 1998. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9806039

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9806039 1998

  8. [8]

    The holographic principle

    Raphael Bousso. The holographic principle. Reviews of Modern Physics , 74(3):825–874, August 2002. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.825

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.825 2002

  9. [9]

    Koul, Joohan Lee, and Rafael D

    Luca Bombelli, Rabinder K. Koul, Joohan Lee, and Rafael D. Sorkin. Quantum source of entropy for black holes. Physical Review D, 34(2):373–383, 1986. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34.373

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.34.373 1986

  10. [10]

    Entropy and area

    Mark Srednicki. Entropy and area. Phys. Rev. Lett., 71(5):666–669, August 1993. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.666

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.666 1993

  11. [11]

    Jens Eisert, Marcus Cramer, and Martin B. Plenio. Area laws for the entanglement entropy. Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(1):277–306, 2010. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.277

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.277 2010

  12. [12]

    Schroeder

    Michael Edward Peskin and Daniel V. Schroeder. An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory . Westview Press,

    work page

  13. [13]

    Reading, USA: Addison-Wesley (1995) 842 p

    work page 1995

  14. [14]

    Padmanabhan

    T. Padmanabhan. Gravitation: Foundations and Frontiers. Cambridge University Press, January 2010

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    The Large-N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    Juan Maldacena. The Large-N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 38:1113–1133, January 1999. doi:10.1023/A:1026654312961

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1026654312961 1999

  16. [16]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    Edward Witten. Anti-de Sitter space and holography. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , 2: 253–291, January 1998. doi:10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9802150

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9802150 1998

  17. [17]

    The dS / CFT correspondence

    Andrew Strominger. The dS / CFT correspondence. JHEP, 10:034, 2001. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/10/034

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/10/034 2001

  18. [18]

    Higher Spin de Sitter Hilbert Space

    Dionysios Anninos, Frederik Denef, Ruben Monten, and Zimo Sun. Higher Spin de Sitter Hilbert Space. JHEP, 10:071, 2019. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)071. [Erratum: JHEP 06, 085 (2024)]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2019)071 2019

  19. [19]

    A half de Sitter holography.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2023(10):137, October 2023

    Taishi Kawamoto, Shan-Ming Ruan, Yu-ki Suzuki, and Tadashi Takayanagi. A half de Sitter holography.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2023(10):137, October 2023. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2023)137

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2023)137 2023

  20. [20]

    Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere

    Sabrina Pasterski, Shu-Heng Shao, and Andrew Strominger. Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere. Phys. Rev. D, 96(6):065026, 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.065026

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.065026 2017

  21. [21]

    Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes

    Sabrina Pasterski and Shu-Heng Shao. Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes. Phys. Rev. D, 96(6):065022,

    work page

  22. [22]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.065022

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.065022

  23. [23]

    Celestial Holography

    Sabrina Pasterski, Monica Pate, and Ana-Maria Raclariu. Celestial Holography. In Snowmass 2021, 11 2021

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Holography in flat spacetimes: the case for carroll, 2024

    Arjun Bagchi, Prateksh Dhivakar, and Sudipta Dutta. Holography in flat spacetimes: the case for carroll, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.11246. 45

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    The Carrollian Kaleidoscope

    Arjun Bagchi, Aritra Banerjee, Prateksh Dhivakar, Saikat Mondal, and Ashish Shukla. The carrollian kaleido- scope, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16164

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Holographic quantum matter

    Sean A. Hartnoll, Andrew Lucas, and Subir Sachdev. Holographic quantum matter, 2018. URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/1612.07324

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Entanglement renormalization and holography

    Brian Swingle. Entanglement renormalization and holography. Physical Review D, 86(6), September 2012. ISSN 1550-2368. doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.065007. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.065007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.065007 2012

  28. [28]

    Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence

    Fernando Pastawski, Beni Yoshida, Daniel Harlow, and John Preskill. Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2015:149, June 2015. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2015)149

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2015)149 2015

  29. [29]

    Holographic Entropy Bound and Local Quantum Field Theory

    Ulvi Yurtsever. Holographic Entropy Bound and Local Quantum Field Theory. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91(4):041302, July 2003. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.041302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.041302 2003

  30. [30]

    A. Aste. Holographic entropy bound from gravitational Fock space truncation. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 69 (1):36–40, January 2005. doi:10.1209/epl/i2004-10317-0

    work page doi:10.1209/epl/i2004-10317-0 2005

  31. [31]

    T. Banks. Cosmological Breaking of Supersymmetry? International Journal of Modern Physics A, 16(5):910–921, January 2001. doi:10.1142/S0217751X01003998

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x01003998 2001

  32. [32]

    Positive vacuum energy and the n-bound

    Raphael Bousso. Positive vacuum energy and the n-bound. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2000(11):038–038, November 2000. ISSN 1029-8479. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/11/038. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 1126-6708/2000/11/038

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/11/038 2000

  33. [33]

    Is there really a de sitter/cft duality

    Lisa Dyson, James Lindesay, and Leonard Susskind. Is there really a de sitter/cft duality. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2002(08):045–045, August 2002. ISSN 1029-8479. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/045. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/045

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/045 2002

  34. [34]

    Taking de Sitter Seriously

    Willy Fischler. Taking de Sitter Seriously. Talk given at Role of Scaling Laws in Physics and Biology (Celebrat- ing the 60th Birthday of Geoffrey West), Santa Fe, Dec., 2000

    work page 2000

  35. [35]

    de Sitter holography with a finite number of states

    Maulik Parikh and Erik Verlinde. de Sitter holography with a finite number of states. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2005(1):054, January 2005. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/01/054

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/01/054 2005

  36. [36]

    Toolkit for scalar fields in universes with finite-dimensional Hilbert space

    Oliver Friedrich, Ashmeet Singh, and Olivier Doré. Toolkit for scalar fields in universes with finite-dimensional Hilbert space. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 39(23):235012, December 2022. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac95f0

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac95f0 2022

  37. [37]

    How low can vacuum energy go when your fields are finite-dimensional? International Journal of Modern Physics D , 28(14):1944006, January 2019

    Chunjun Cao, Aidan Chatwin-Davies, and Ashmeet Singh. How low can vacuum energy go when your fields are finite-dimensional? International Journal of Modern Physics D , 28(14):1944006, January 2019. doi: 10.1142/S0218271819440061

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271819440061 2019

  38. [38]

    Ashmeet Singh and Sean M. Carroll. Modeling Position and Momentum in Finite-Dimensional Hilbert Spaces via Generalized Pauli Operators. arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:1806.10134, June 2018

    work page arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    Overlapping qubits from non- isometric maps and de sitter tensor networks

    ChunJun Cao, Wissam Chemissany, Alexander Jahn, and Zoltán Zimborás. Overlapping qubits from non- isometric maps and de sitter tensor networks. Nature Communications, 16(1), January 2025. ISSN 2041-1723. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55463-9. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55463-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55463-9 2025

  40. [40]

    Carroll, Gong Cheng, and Ashmeet Singh

    Oliver Friedrich, ChunJun Cao, Sean M. Carroll, Gong Cheng, and Ashmeet Singh. Holographic phenomenol- ogy via overlapping degrees of freedom. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 41(19):195003, October 2024. doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ad6e4d

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad6e4d 2024

  41. [41]

    Introduction to mechanics and symmetry, springer-verlag, new york

    Jerrold Marsden and Tudor Ratiu. Introduction to mechanics and symmetry, springer-verlag, new york. 17, 01

    work page

  42. [42]

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2682-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2682-6

  43. [43]

    Abraham, Jerrold E

    Ralph H. Abraham, Jerrold E. Marsden, Tudor S. Ratiu, and Richard Cushman. Foundations of mechanics : a mathematical exposition of classical mechanics with an introduction to the qualitative theory of dynamical systems and applications to the three-body problem. 1978. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:117035581

    work page 1978

  44. [44]

    V.I. Arnold. Mathematical methods of classical mechanics, volume 60. Springer, 1989

    work page 1989

  45. [45]

    Symplectic Model Reduction of Hamiltonian Systems

    Liqian Peng and Kamran Mohseni. Symplectic model reduction of hamiltonian systems, 2015. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/1407.6118

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    J. S. Hesthaven, C. Pagliantini, and N. Ripamonti. Structure-preserving model order reduction of hamiltonian systems, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.12367

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Randomized symplectic model order reduction for hamiltonian systems, 2023

    Robin Herkert, Patrick Buchfink, Bernard Haasdonk, Johannes Rettberg, and Jörg Fehr. Randomized symplectic model order reduction for hamiltonian systems, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04036

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Model reduction on manifolds: A differential geometric framework, 2024

    Patrick Buchfink, Silke Glas, Bernard Haasdonk, and Benjamin Unger. Model reduction on manifolds: A differential geometric framework, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.01963

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    B. Moore. Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 26(1):17–32, 1981. doi:10.1109/TAC.1981.1102568. 46

    work page doi:10.1109/tac.1981.1102568 1981

  50. [50]

    Symplectic Model Order Reduction with Non-Orthonormal Bases

    Patrick Buchfink, Ashish Bhatt, and Bernard Haasdonk. Symplectic model order reduction with non- orthonormal bases, 2019. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10523

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Optimal bases for symplectic model order re- duction of canonizable linear hamiltonian systems

    Patrick Buchfink, Silke Glas, and Bernard Haasdonk. Optimal bases for symplectic model order re- duction of canonizable linear hamiltonian systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55:463–468, 09 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.138

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.138 2022

  52. [52]

    Symplectic model reduction of hamiltonian systems on nonlinear manifolds, 2021

    Patrick Buchfink, Silke Glas, and Bernard Haasdonk. Symplectic model reduction of hamiltonian systems on nonlinear manifolds, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.10815

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Chapter 2: Reduced Basis Methods for Parametrized PDEs—A Tutorial Introduction for Sta- tionary and Instationary Problems , pages 65–136

    Bernard Haasdonk. Chapter 2: Reduced Basis Methods for Parametrized PDEs—A Tutorial Introduction for Sta- tionary and Instationary Problems , pages 65–136. doi:10.1137/1.9781611974829.ch2. URL https://epubs. siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/1.9781611974829.ch2

    work page doi:10.1137/1.9781611974829.ch2

  54. [54]

    Hesthaven

    Babak Maboudi Afkham and Jan S. Hesthaven. Structure preserving model reduction of parametric hamil- tonian systems. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , 39(6):A2616–A2644, January 2017. ISSN 1095-7197. doi:10.1137/17m1111991. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/17M1111991

    work page doi:10.1137/17m1111991 2017

  55. [55]

    Maximum entropy snapshot sampling for reduced basis generation, 2020

    Fotios Kasolis and Markus Clemens. Maximum entropy snapshot sampling for reduced basis generation, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.01280

    work page arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    Golub and Charles F

    Gene H. Golub and Charles F. van Loan.Matrix Computations. JHU Press, fourth edition, 2013. ISBN 1421407949 9781421407944. URL http://www.cs.cornell.edu/cv/GVL4/golubandvanloan.htm

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Nesmith C. Ankeny. Sums of three squares. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society , 8(2):316–319,

    work page

  58. [58]

    URL https://doi.org/10.2307/2033735

    doi:10.2307/2033735. URL https://doi.org/10.2307/2033735

    work page doi:10.2307/2033735

  59. [59]

    Dirichlet’s proof of the three-square theorem: An algorithmic perspective

    Paul Pollack and Peter Schorn. Dirichlet’s proof of the three-square theorem: An algorithmic perspective. Math. Comput., 88:1007–1019, 2018. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:56486715

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    Efficient Computation of Hyperspherical Bessel Functions

    Arthur Kosowsky. Efficient computation of hyperspherical bessel functions, 1998. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/astro-ph/9805173

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  61. [61]

    Computation of hyperspherical Bessel functions

    Thomas Tram. Computation of hyperspherical bessel functions, 2017. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1311.0839

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    Bender and Steven A

    Carl M. Bender and Steven A. Orszag. Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers I. Springer,

    work page

  63. [63]

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3069-2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3069-2

  64. [64]

    Eigenvalues in riemannian geometry

    Isaac Chavel. Eigenvalues in riemannian geometry. 1984. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:117120779

    work page 1984

  65. [65]

    Energy stable and conservative dynamical low-rank approximation for the su-olson problem, 2023

    Lena Baumann, Lukas Einkemmer, Christian Klingenberg, and Jonas Kusch. Energy stable and conservative dynamical low-rank approximation for the su-olson problem, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2307. 07538

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    Dynamical low-rank approximation for stochastic dif- ferential equations

    Yoshihito Kazashi, Fabio Nobile, and Fabio Zoccolan. Dynamical low-rank approximation for stochastic dif- ferential equations. June 2024. doi:10.1090/mcom/3999. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/mcom/3999

    work page doi:10.1090/mcom/3999 2024

  67. [67]

    Hamiltonian neural networks, 2019

    Sam Greydanus, Misko Dzamba, and Jason Yosinski. Hamiltonian neural networks, 2019. URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/1906.01563

    work page arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    Sympnets: Intrinsic structure- preserving symplectic networks for identifying hamiltonian systems, 2020

    Pengzhan Jin, Zhen Zhang, Aiqing Zhu, Yifa Tang, and George Em Karniadakis. Sympnets: Intrinsic structure- preserving symplectic networks for identifying hamiltonian systems, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2001.03750

    work page arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    Remarks on entanglement entropy for gauge fields

    Horacio Casini, Marina Huerta, and José Alejandro Rosabal. Remarks on entanglement entropy for gauge fields. Phys. Rev. D, 89(8):085012, April 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.085012

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.085012 2014

  70. [70]

    An Introduction to Harmonic Analysis

    Yitzhak Katznelson. An Introduction to Harmonic Analysis . 01 2004. ISBN 9780521838290. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165372

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165372 2004

  71. [71]

    Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras

    Rudolf Haag. Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras. Springer, 1992

    work page 1992

  72. [72]

    Robert M. Wald. Quantum field theory in curved spacetime, 1995. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/ 9509057

    work page 1995

  73. [73]

    Gerald B. Folland. Harmonic Analysis in Phase Space. (AM-122) . Princeton University Press, 1989. ISBN 9780691085289. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1b9rzs2

    work page 1989

  74. [74]

    Brian C. Hall. Quantum Theory for Mathematicians. Number 267 in Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer New York. ISBN 978-1-4614-7115-8

    work page

  75. [75]

    Quantum minimal surfaces from quantum error correction

    Christopher Akers and Geoff Penington. Quantum minimal surfaces from quantum error correction. SciPost Physics, 12(5), May 2022. ISSN 2542-4653. doi:10.21468/scipostphys.12.5.157. URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 21468/SciPostPhys.12.5.157

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.12.5.157 2022

  76. [76]

    The black hole interior from non-isometric codes and complexity, 2022

    Chris Akers, Netta Engelhardt, Daniel Harlow, Geoff Penington, and Shreya Vardhan. The black hole interior from non-isometric codes and complexity, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.06536. 47

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Leading order corrections to the quantum extremal surface prescription

    Chris Akers and Geoff Penington. Leading order corrections to the quantum extremal surface prescription. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021(4), April 2021. ISSN 1029-8479. doi:10.1007/jhep04(2021)062. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2021)062

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2021)062 2021

  78. [78]

    R., Millman, K

    Charles R. Harris, K. Jarrod Millman, Stéfan J. van der Walt, Ralf Gommers, Pauli Virtanen, David Courna- peau, Eric Wieser, Julian Taylor, Sebastian Berg, Nathaniel J. Smith, Robert Kern, Matti Picus, Stephan Hoyer, Marten H. van Kerkwijk, Matthew Brett, Allan Haldane, Jaime Fernández del Río, Mark Wiebe, Pearu Pe- terson, Pierre Gérard-Marchant, Kevin S...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  79. [79]

    Cupy : A numpy-compatible library for nvidia gpu calculations

    Ryosuke Okuta, Yuya Unno, Daisuke Nishino, Shohei Hido, and Crissman. Cupy : A numpy-compatible library for nvidia gpu calculations. 2017. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:41278748

    work page 2017

  80. [80]

    J. D. Hunter. Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering , 9(3):90–95, 2007. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55. Appendix A: Analytic construction of the embedding matrix V ⋆ In this appendix we construct, analytically and in closed form, the time–independent ortho–symplectic embedding matrix V ⋆ that maps reduced coordinates to the f...

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

Showing first 80 references.