Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

This paper argues that in the large-region limit the size-derivative of entanglement entropy approaches the thermal entropy density, so entanglement variations can be used to read off thermodynamic response and equation-of-state data.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 18:34 UTC pith:VYMEUBSA

load-bearing objection The finite-density lattice demonstration is a genuine step, but the central Maxwell relation (Eq. 12) has a sign error that the Fig. 3 data actually contradict—fixable, but it has to be resolved before the formal claims as written can stand. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.07635 v2 pith:VYMEUBSA submitted 2026-03-08 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechhep-lathep-phquant-ph

Thermal and chemical response from entanglement entropy

Niko Jokela , Aatu Rajala , Tobias Rindlisbacher This is my paper
classification hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechhep-lathep-phquant-ph
keywords entanglement entropythermal entropyRényi entropyfinite chemical potentialMaxwell relationO(4) modellattice field theoryequation of state
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to establish a precise, nonperturbative link between entanglement entropy and bulk thermodynamics: for a slab-shaped entangling region much wider than any correlation length, the derivative of entanglement entropy with respect to the slab width approaches the thermal entropy density, independent of microscopic details. The same statement holds for Rényi entropies of any integer order, with the thermal entropy replaced by a discrete step-scaling approximation in temperature. At finite chemical potential, these relations imply a generalized Maxwell relation linking mixed derivatives of entanglement entropy to the temperature derivative of the charge density. The paper demonstrates these relations nonperturbatively in the three-dimensional O(4) model at finite density, using a dual-variable worm algorithm to compute Rényi entropies and charge densities, and conjectures that they are generic features of continuum quantum field theories. If the conjecture is correct, entanglement measurements provide a route to directly extracting equation-of-state information.

Core claim

The core claim is the identity (Eq. 10): in the limit where the slab width ℓ and the total spatial extent L both go to infinity with ℓ≪L, the derivative of entanglement entropy with respect to ℓ, divided by the transverse area V⊥, equals the thermal entropy density s(T, μ) at the system's temperature and chemical potential. For the Rényi entropy H_r of integer order r≥2, the same limit gives a discrete approximation s_r(T, μ) to the thermal entropy, constructed as a step-scaling finite-difference in temperature with scaling factor r, which reduces to ordinary entropy as r→1. At finite chemical potential, differentiating with respect to μ produces a generalized Maxwell relation: the mixed der

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the replica method for entanglement entropy, expressed as a limit of replicated partition functions. The pivotal input is an identity (Eq. 9), imported from earlier work, stating that for ξ≪ℓ≪L the ℓ-derivative of the replicated free energy satisfies (1/V⊥) ∂_ℓ log Z̃(ℓ,r) → −[ω(rβ, μ) − r ω(β, μ)], where ω is the dimensionless grand-canonical free-energy density. Combining this with the definition of S_EE as the r→1 derivative of log tr ρ^r_A yields the thermal entropy result. For numerical access, the paper uses the boundary-deformation method to compute the ℓ-derivative of the second Rényi entropy H_2 as a log-ratio of replicated partition functions, circumventin

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on an imported identity (Eq. 9 from earlier work) stating that for large slabs the ℓ-derivative of the replicated free energy equals ω(rβ, μ) − rω(β, μ), together with the assumption that the r→1 limit commutes with the ℓ-derivative; the paper takes the identity as given, and the numerical test checks only the r=2 case at one slab width.

What would settle it

These relations can be tested in solvable models by computing, for a free scalar or free fermion at finite temperature in 2+1 dimensions, the direct entanglement-spectrum derivative ∂_ℓ S_EE for slabs with ℓ≫ξ and checking whether (∂_ℓ S_EE)/V⊥ approaches s(T); if the ratio deviates, the identity (10) fails. Alternatively, compute the Rényi step-scaling relation (18) at r=3 and r=4 on the same O(4) lattices and check whether s_r converges to s as r→1, or verify (12) at r→1 using exact diagonalization or tensor-network methods for a finite-density lattice system.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For slab-shaped regions much wider than any correlation length, the growth of entanglement entropy with region size is the thermal entropy density times the added volume, so the UV-divergent area term drops out of size derivatives.
  • At finite chemical potential, entanglement entropy satisfies thermodynamic response relations, including a generalized Maxwell relation linking mixed μ–ℓ derivatives to the temperature derivative of the charge density.
  • Rényi entropies of any integer order give the same physics, with the thermal entropy replaced by a discrete step-scaling approximation in temperature; as r→1 these converge to the exact relations.
  • In the 3D O(4) model, the predicted equality holds within errors for ξ_max/ℓ up to about 0.5–1 depending on temperature, and the entanglement-derived observable clearly resolves the finite-density phase transition.
  • The relation connects entanglement entropy to bulk thermodynamics nonperturbatively, opening a route to extract equation-of-state information from entanglement data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The derivation relies only on extensivity of the free energy and the slab geometry, so the relations likely extend to other entangling-region shapes and to interacting theories with gauge fields; testing spherical regions in conformal field theories would sharpen this claim.
  • The numerical evidence uses only r=2 and a single slab width; a direct test of the r→1 limit would require a different estimator, and free-field theories could provide an analytic check for all r, which would be a strong test of the conjectured genericity.
  • If the conjecture is correct, entanglement entropy measurements on quantum simulators could serve as a thermometer or densitometer for many-body systems without coupling to a heat bath, though extracting s from a single measurement requires controlling the region-size derivative.
  • The generalized Maxwell relation implies an integrability condition on entanglement data; checking these cross-relations in experiments or simulations could confirm the thermodynamic interpretation without ever computing entropies directly.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper argues that for slab-shaped entangling regions in the large-region limit, the size derivative of entanglement entropy equals the thermal entropy density, and that this relation leads to thermodynamic response identities, including a generalized Maxwell relation coupling chemical potential and charge density. The argument proceeds through the replica construction and uses a previously proposed identity, Eq. (9), to relate size derivatives of the replicated partition function to free-energy differences at scaled temperatures. The authors test an r=2 Rényi version of the relation by lattice simulations of the three-dimensional O(4) model at finite chemical potential, using a dual worm algorithm and a boundary-deformation method. They report agreement up to ξ_max/ℓ ≈ 0.5–1 and conjecture that the relation is generic in continuum QFTs.

Significance. If the central relation is correct, it provides a novel, nonperturbative bridge between entanglement entropy and equilibrium thermodynamics: variations of the entangling region encode equation-of-state data, and the generalized Maxwell relation would be a new universal sum rule. The lattice calculation is technically substantial: it uses a sign-problem-free dual representation, a boundary-deformation algorithm, and an internal-consistency check, and it explicitly tests a finite-density setting where such relations are difficult to access. However, the central identity is imported from a previous paper whose authors include two of the current authors, and the claimed Maxwell relation is written with an internal sign inconsistency. The numerical data appear to support the corrected sign, so the core idea is plausible, but the manuscript as written does not yet establish the headline relation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eqs. (12), (18), (27)] The generalized Maxwell relation has the wrong sign. From dω_L = -s dT - n dμ, the mixed-partial relation is (∂s/∂μ)_T = +(∂n/∂T)_μ. Since ∂n/∂T = -β² ∂β n, Eq. (12) should read (1/V⊥)∂²S_EE/∂μ∂ℓ = -β² ∂β n. Correspondingly, differentiating Eq. (15) with respect to μ gives +Δ_T^r n, not -Δ_T^r n as in Eq. (18). The numerical implementation in Eq. (27), -2N_t[n(2N_t)-n(N_t)] = +Δ_T^2 n, has the sign required by the corrected relation. Thus Fig. 3 tests the corrected relation and contradicts Eqs. (12) and (18) as written. This internal inconsistency must be fixed before the thermodynamic-response claim can be assessed.
  2. [Eqs. (8)–(10)] The load-bearing input, Eq. (9), is not derived here; the text says 'we now use the argument presented in [12]'. Since [12] shares two of the current authors, the derivation is not independently established in this Letter. Moreover, the commutation of r→1 with ∂_ℓ, assumed below Eq. (8), is nontrivial. If Eq. (9) or the commutation fails at finite μ, the central relations (10), (12), (15), and (18) collapse. A numerical test at r=2 and one lattice spacing cannot by itself control the r→1 continuum limit. The authors should either provide a self-contained derivation of Eq. (9) with explicit hypotheses or clearly label it as an assumption and discuss its validity.
  3. [Eq. (27) and Fig. 3] The nonperturbative evidence is more limited than the text suggests. The simulation tests the r=2 step-scaling relation (27) at a single entangling-region width ℓ=17.5 and at N_s=12, and agreement is shown only for ξ_max/ℓ ≲ 0.5–1, i.e., away from the ξ_max ≪ ℓ limit in which Eq. (9) is supposed to hold. No r→1 extrapolation is attempted, although the headline statement (10) is an r→1 (von Neumann) result. The statement 'strong nonperturbative evidence' should be softened, or systematic checks toward r→1 and larger ℓ should be provided.
minor comments (4)
  1. [After Eq. (10)] The sentence saying the derivative 'can equivalently be understood as a derivative with respect to spatial size of A' is confusing, since ∂_ℓ is already the derivative with respect to the slab width. Clarify what distinction is intended.
  2. [Eq. (20)] The lattice action includes parameters κ, λ, and j, but the simulation parameters state κ=1.2 and j_3=0.2 without giving λ. Please specify λ or state that the linearized model is used.
  3. [Fig. 1] The caption refers to ϕ4, while the text and the main discussion refer to the ϕ0 Goldstone mode. Align the notation.
  4. [Ref. [10]] The companion paper is listed as 'in progress'; for publication, please provide a stable arXiv reference or summary of the relevant derivations that are invoked from it.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Central identity Eq. (10) rests on Eq. (9) imported from the authors' own ref. [12] without derivation here; the r=2 numerical test gives partial independent support, so score 4 rather than higher. A separate sign error in Eq. (12)/(18) is a correctness issue, not circularity.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Between Eqs. (8) and (10), Eq. (9)]
    "We now use the argument presented in [12], that for ξ≪ℓ≪L, i.e., if the linear sizes of the entangling region A and its complement B are both much larger than the longest correlation length ξ of the theory, then one has −lim_{ℓ,L→∞, ℓ≪L} 1/V⊥ ∂log Z̃(ℓ,r)/∂ℓ =ω(rβ, µ)−rω(β, µ),(9)"

    Equation (10), the paper's headline claim, is obtained by combining (8) with (9) and (4); the only non-trivial input is (9). The paper does not derive (9); it attributes it to ref. [12], whose authors include N. Jokela and T. Rindlisbacher of the present paper. The r→1/ℓ→∞ limit needed for (10) is not independently verified here: the numerical check (27)/Fig. 3 tests the r=2, finite-ℓ relation (18), not (9) itself. Thus the central derivation is load-bearing on the authors' own prior work, with no independent proof supplied in this paper.

full rationale

The core derivation is not self-contained: Eq. (10) follows from Eq. (9), and Eq. (9) is imported from ref. [12], a paper sharing two of the present authors (Jokela and Rindlisbacher). This is load-bearing self-citation, so the score is not 0-2. However, I cannot exhibit a reduction of Eq. (9) to a definition or a fit; it is a substantive physical statement about the ℓ-derivative of the replicated partition function. Moreover, the numerical test in Eq. (27)/Fig. 3 compares two separately defined lattice quantities—the mixed μ-ℓ derivative of H2 (via ∂ℓ ñ) and the step-scaled charge density 2Nt[n(2Nt)−n(Nt)]—and shows agreement, providing genuine independent evidence for the r=2 finite-ℓ version of the response relation. This prevents the score from being 6-8. I also note, separately from circularity, an internal sign inconsistency: the paper states 'From the Maxwell relation (∂µs)|T = −(∂T n)|µ', but the standard Maxwell relation from Eq. (1) is (∂µs)_T = +(∂T n)_µ. Consequently Eq. (12)'s +β²∂βn and Eq. (18)'s −Δ_T^r n appear to have the wrong sign, while Eq. (27) uses the corrected sign. This is a correctness defect and does not change the circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or dynamical entities are introduced; the boundary-deformation method is an algorithmic technique rather than an invented entity. The free parameters are simulation choices. The key axiom is Eq. (9), which carries most of the theoretical weight and is imported from a self-cited prior paper.

free parameters (3)
  • hopping parameter κ = 1.2
    Simulation parameter chosen to place the O(4) model deep in the spontaneously broken phase; not fitted to the target thermodynamic identities, but it defines the lattice regime of the numerical evidence.
  • external source j3 = 0.2
    Chosen to give Goldstone modes a finite mass m0 ≈ 0.5 at μ = 0, ensuring a finite correlation length as required by Eq. (9); not fitted to the target relations.
  • Goldstone mass m0 = ≈ 0.5
    Measured at μ = 0 and used to set the critical chemical potential μc = m0 and the correlation-length scale ξ_max(μ) in Figure 3.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Eq. (9): for ξ ≪ ℓ ≪ L, -lim 1/V⊥ ∂_ℓ log Z̃(ℓ,r) = ω(rβ, μ) - r ω(β, μ)
    Quoted from ref. [12] and used to convert the ℓ-derivative of the replicated free energy into the free-energy difference; not derived in this paper. This is the load-bearing premise for Eqs. (10), (12), (15), and (18).
  • domain assumption The r→1 limit commutes with ∂/∂ℓ
    Stated below Eq. (8): 'we assumed that taking the limit (r→1) commutes with taking the ℓ-derivative.' Without this, the step-scaling Rényi result does not reduce to the S_EE relation.
  • standard math Standard thermodynamic Maxwell relation dω_L = -s dT - n dμ
    Used to convert Eq. (10) into the generalized Maxwell relation (12).
  • standard math Replica representation of Rényi/entanglement entropy
    Eqs. (6)-(7) assume the replica trick defines S_EE; the numerical work uses r=2 and finite differences rather than the analytic-continuation limit r→1.
  • domain assumption Dual flux representation / worm algorithm is an exact rewriting of the O(4) lattice path integral at finite μ
    Taken from refs. [21-23]; used to circumvent the sign problem. Not independently proved in this paper, but well established in the cited literature.
  • domain assumption m_-(μ) = m0 - μ for μ < m0
    Used to compute ξ_max(μ) = 1/m_-(μ) and set the horizontal axis of Figure 3; a standard effective-field/chiral result, not central to the derivation itself.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 10181 in / 13703 out tokens · 117090 ms · 2026-08-02T18:34:41.096576+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study entanglement entropy (EE) in interacting quantum field theories (QFTs) at finite density. We argue that, in the limit of large subregions, the derivative of EE with respect to the size of the entangling region approaches the thermal entropy density, independently of microscopic details. We make this relation explicit using slab-shaped subregions, where the limiting behavior can be directly identified. At finite chemical potential, we show that EE satisfies thermodynamic response relations, including a generalized Maxwell relation linking chemical potential and charge density. We provide strong nonperturbative evidence for these statements in the three-dimensional O(4) model, and conjecture that they are generic features of continuum QFTs, establishing a two-way link between entanglement and thermodynamics that opens a route toward extracting the equation-of-state information from entanglement data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.07635 by Aatu Rajala, Niko Jokela, Tobias Rindlisbacher.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Mass spectrum at κ = 1.2, j3 = 0.2 as a function of µ. Note that the ϕ + mass is only accurately determined up to the critical µ ≈ 0.5, since at finite density, ϕ + has overlap with the vacuum and is no longer a well-defined particle state. To test the relation (12), the charge density has to be defined on the lattice in terms of the dual variables. We will explicitly distinguish between the charge density… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: compares the two sides of (27), showing V −1 ⊥ ∂µ∂ℓH2 (bands) and −2 Nt (n(2 Nt) − n(Nt)) (point 0.2 0.5 1 0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 ξmax(μ)/� j=0, j3=0.2 T/m0=0.408 T/m0=0.34 T/m0=0.292 T/m0=0.255 T/m0=0.227 T/m0=0.204 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows the two quantities from relation (26) as a function of µ. For visual clarity, only two repre￾sentative values of Nt are displayed; the remaining val￾ues exhibit the same qualitative behavior. The excellent agreement between the results obtained from ∂ℓH2 and ˜n confirms the internal consistency of the simulation algo￾rithm. In addition, the results clearly resolve the finite￾density phase transition … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Determination of thermodynamics from entanglement entropy in the finite-density O(N) model

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    The derivative of entanglement entropy with respect to subregion volume equals the thermal entropy density in the large-subregion limit, verified via lattice simulations of the finite-density O(4) model using dual wor...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 44 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Srednicki, Entropy and area, Phys

    M. Srednicki, Entropy and area, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 666 (1993), arXiv:hep-th/9303048

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  2. [2]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Area laws for the entanglement entropy - a review, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010), arXiv:0808.3773 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta, Entanglement entropy in free quantum field theory, J. Phys. A42, 504007 (2009), arXiv:0905.2562 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    Nishioka, Entanglement entropy: holography and renormalization group, Rev

    T. Nishioka, Entanglement entropy: holography and renormalization group, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035007 (2018), arXiv:1801.10352 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech.0406, P06002 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0405152

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  6. [6]

    Swingle and T

    B. Swingle and T. Senthil, Universal crossovers between entanglement entropy and thermal entropy, Phys. Rev. B87, 045123 (2013), arXiv:1112.1069 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    Bhattacharya, M

    J. Bhattacharya, M. Nozaki, T. Takayanagi, and T. Uga- jin, Thermodynamical Property of Entanglement En- tropy for Excited States, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 091602 (2013), arXiv:1212.1164 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    D. D. Blanco, H. Casini, L.-Y. Hung, and R. C. My- ers, Relative Entropy and Holography, JHEP08, 060, arXiv:1305.3182 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Belin, L.-Y

    A. Belin, L.-Y. Hung, A. Maloney, S. Matsuura, R. C. Myers, and T. Sierens, Holographic Charged Renyi En- tropies, JHEP12, 059, arXiv:1310.4180 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Jokela, A

    N. Jokela, A. Rajala, and T. Rindlisbacher, in progress, (2026)

    2026

  11. [11]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory, J. Phys. A42, 504005 (2009), arXiv:0905.4013 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  12. [12]

    Jokela, K

    N. Jokela, K. Rummukainen, A. Salami, A. P¨ onni, and T. Rindlisbacher, Progress in the lattice evaluation of en- tanglement entropy of three-dimensional Yang-Mills the- ories and holographic bulk reconstruction, JHEP12, 137, arXiv:2304.08949 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Nakagawa, A

    Y. Nakagawa, A. Nakamura, S. Motoki, and V. I. Za- kharov, Quantum entanglement in SU(3) lattice Yang- Mills theory at zero and finite temperatures, PoSLA T- TICE2010, 281 (2010), arXiv:1104.1011 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of en- tanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 181602 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  15. [15]

    Jokela and J

    N. Jokela and J. G. Subils, Is entanglement a probe of confinement?, JHEP02, 147, arXiv:2010.09392 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    Nishioka and T

    T. Nishioka and T. Takayanagi, AdS Bubbles, Entropy and Closed String Tachyons, JHEP01, 090, arXiv:hep- th/0611035

    arXiv

  17. [17]

    I. R. Klebanov, D. Kutasov, and A. Murugan, Entangle- ment as a probe of confinement, Nucl. Phys. B796, 274 (2008), arXiv:0709.2140 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  18. [18]

    Prokof’ev and B

    N. Prokof’ev and B. Svistunov, Worm algorithms for clas- sical statistical models, Physical review letters87, 160601 (2001)

    2001

  19. [19]

    Philipsen, Lattice QCD at finite temperature and den- sity, Eur

    O. Philipsen, Lattice QCD at finite temperature and den- sity, Eur. Phys. J. ST152, 29 (2007), arXiv:0708.1293 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  20. [20]

    de Forcrand, Simulating QCD at finite density, PoS LA T2009, 010 (2009), arXiv:1005.0539 [hep-lat]

    P. de Forcrand, Simulating QCD at finite density, PoS LA T2009, 010 (2009), arXiv:1005.0539 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  21. [21]

    Rindlisbacher and P

    T. Rindlisbacher and P. de Forcrand, Lattice simulation of the SU(2) chiral model at zero and non-zero pion den- sity, PoSLA TTICE2015, 171 (2016), arXiv:1512.05684 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    Rindlisbacher, O

    T. Rindlisbacher, O. ˚Akerlund, and P. de Forcrand, Sampling of General Correlators in Worm Algorithm- based Simulations, Nucl. Phys. B909, 542 (2016), arXiv:1602.09017 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Rindlisbacher,Lattice Field Theory at Finite Density, Ph.D

    T. Rindlisbacher,Lattice Field Theory at Finite Density, Ph.D. thesis, Zurich, ETH (2017)

    2017

  24. [24]

    Gattringer and T

    C. Gattringer and T. Kloiber, Lattice study of the Silver Blaze phenomenon for a charged scalarϕ 4 field, Nucl. Phys. B869, 56 (2013), arXiv:1206.2954 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  25. [25]

    Gattringer and T

    C. Gattringer and T. Kloiber, Spectroscopy in finite den- sity lattice field theory: An exploratory study in the relativistic Bose gas, Phys. Lett. B720, 210 (2013), arXiv:1212.3770 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  26. [26]

    M. G. Endres, Method for simulating O(N) lattice mod- els at finite density, Phys. Rev. D75, 065012 (2007), arXiv:hep-lat/0610029

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  27. [27]

    Bruckmann, C

    F. Bruckmann, C. Gattringer, T. Kloiber, and T. Sule- jmanpasic, Dual lattice representations for O(N) and CP(N−1) models with a chemical potential, Phys. Lett. B749, 495 (2015), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 751, 595–595 (2015)], arXiv:1507.04253 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    S. Katz, F. Niedermayer, D. Nogradi, and C. Torok, Comparison of algorithms for solving the sign prob- lem in the O(3) model in 1+1 dimensions at finite chemical potential, Phys. Rev. D95, 054506 (2017), arXiv:1611.03987 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    Schmidt, Y

    A. Schmidt, Y. Delgado Mercado, and C. Gattringer, Monte Carlo simulation of abelian gauge-Higgs lattice models using dual representation, PoSLA TTICE2012, 098 (2012), arXiv:1211.1573 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  30. [30]

    Delgado Mercado, C

    Y. Delgado Mercado, C. Gattringer, and A. Schmidt, Surface worm algorithm for abelian Gauge-Higgs sys- tems on the lattice, Comput. Phys. Commun.184, 1535 (2013), arXiv:1211.3436 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  31. [31]

    Rindlisbacher and P

    T. Rindlisbacher and P. de Forcrand, Worm algorithm for the Worm algorithm for theCP N−1 model model, Nucl. Phys. B918, 178 (2017), arXiv:1610.01435 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Rajala, N

    A. Rajala, N. Jokela, and T. Rindlisbacher, Lattice stud- ies of entanglement entropy inO(N) models at finite den- sities (2026) arXiv:2602.22881 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    P. V. Buividovich and M. I. Polikarpov, Numerical study of entanglement entropy in SU(2) lattice gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B802, 458 (2008), arXiv:0802.4247 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  34. [34]

    Rabenstein, N

    A. Rabenstein, N. Bodendorfer, P. Buividovich, and A. Sch¨ afer, Lattice study of R´ enyi entanglement entropy inSU(N c) lattice Yang-Mills theory withN c = 2,3,4, Phys. Rev. D100, 034504 (2019), arXiv:1812.04279 [hep- lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Rindlisbacher, N

    T. Rindlisbacher, N. Jokela, A. P¨ onni, K. Rummukainen, and A. Salami, Improved lattice method for determin- ing entanglement measures in SU(N) gauge theories, PoS LA TTICE2022, 031 (2022), arXiv:2211.00425 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Nakagawa, A

    Y. Nakagawa, A. Nakamura, S. Motoki, and V. I. Za- kharov, Entanglement entropy of SU(3) Yang-Mills the- ory, PoSLA T2009, 188 (2009), arXiv:0911.2596 [hep- lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  37. [37]

    E. Itou, K. Nagata, Y. Nakagawa, A. Nakamura, and V. I. Zakharov, Entanglement in Four-Dimensional 7 SU(3) Gauge Theory, PTEP2016, 061B01 (2016), arXiv:1512.01334 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    Alba, Out-of-equilibrium protocol for R´ enyi entropies via the Jarzynski equality, Phys

    V. Alba, Out-of-equilibrium protocol for R´ enyi entropies via the Jarzynski equality, Phys. Rev. E95, 062132 (2017), arXiv:1609.02157 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Bulgarelli and M

    A. Bulgarelli and M. Panero, Entanglement entropy from non-equilibrium Monte Carlo simulations, JHEP06, 030, arXiv:2304.03311 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Bulgarelli and M

    A. Bulgarelli and M. Panero, Duality transformations and the entanglement entropy of gauge theories, JHEP 06, 041, arXiv:2404.01987 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Bulgarelli, E

    A. Bulgarelli, E. Cellini, K. Jansen, S. K¨ uhn, A. Nada, S. Nakajima, K. A. Nicoli, and M. Panero, Flow-Based Sampling for Entanglement Entropy and the Machine Learning of Defects, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 151601 (2025), arXiv:2410.14466 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Bulgarelli, E

    A. Bulgarelli, E. Cellini, K. Jansen, S. K¨ uhn, A. Nada, S. Nakajima, K. A. Nicoli, and M. Panero, Computing quantum entanglement with machine learning, in42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory(2025) arXiv:2512.11389 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Amorosso, S

    R. Amorosso, S. Syritsyn, and R. Venugopalan, Entangle- ment entropy of a color flux tube in (2+1)D Yang-Mills theory, JHEP12, 177, arXiv:2410.00112 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Amorosso, S

    R. Amorosso, S. Syritsyn, and R. Venugopalan, En- tanglement entropy of a color flux tube in (1+1)D Yang–Mills theory, Phys. Lett. B868, 139806 (2025), arXiv:2411.12818 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Amorosso, S

    R. Amorosso, S. Syritsyn, and R. Venugopalan, Entangle- ment enabled tomography of flux tubes in (2+1)d yang- mills theory (2026), arXiv:2601.17199 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Coser, L

    A. Coser, L. Tagliacozzo, and E. Tonni, On R´ enyi en- tropies of disjoint intervals in conformal field theory, J. Stat. Mech.1401, P01008 (2014), arXiv:1309.2189 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  47. [47]

    L.-P. Yang, Y. Liu, H. Zou, Z. Y. Xie, and Y. Meurice, Fine structure of the entanglement entropy in the O(2) model, Phys. Rev. E93, 012138 (2016), arXiv:1507.01471 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Bazavov, Y

    A. Bazavov, Y. Meurice, S. W. Tsai, J. Unmuth-Yockey, L.-P. Yang, and J. Zhang, Estimating the central charge from the R´ enyi entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. D96, 034514 (2017), arXiv:1703.10577 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Cataldi, G

    G. Cataldi, G. Magnifico, P. Silvi, and S. Montangero, Simulating (2+1)D SU(2) Yang-Mills lattice gauge the- ory at finite density with tensor networks, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033057 (2024), arXiv:2307.09396 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Hayazaki, D

    T. Hayazaki, D. Kadoh, S. Takeda, and G. Tanaka, Ten- sor renormalization group approach to entanglement en- tropy (2025), arXiv:2509.02185 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025