pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.00978 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-01 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Nonlinear Lattice Framework for Inflation: Bridging stochastic inflation and the δ{N} formalism

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 22:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-ph
keywords inflationnonlinear perturbationslattice simulationdelta N formalismultra-slow-rollnon-Gaussianitycurvature perturbationsnumerical methods
0
0 comments X

The pith

A shear-free lattice framework computes fully nonlinear curvature perturbations during inflation including ultra-slow-roll phases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors develop a lattice simulation method for single-field inflation that uses locally Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker patches without shear to model inhomogeneous expansion. This allows tracking curvature contributions to the local expansion and proper volume effects in a computationally efficient way compared to full numerical relativity. It enables direct calculation of nonlinear δN observables on uniform density slices and other time-dependent estimators for curvature perturbations. The approach is tested in slow-roll and then applied to a model with an intermittent ultra-slow-roll phase where it reveals separation of perturbation estimators and stabilization of non-Gaussianity.

Core claim

We introduce a nonlinear lattice framework for single-field inflation based on a shear-free, locally Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker geometry. This approach captures inhomogeneous local expansion rates, curvature contributions to the local Friedmann equation, and proper-volume weighting at a fraction of the computational cost of full numerical relativity. We construct fully nonlinear δN observables on uniform-density slices, together with other practical time-dependent estimators for the curvature perturbations.

What carries the argument

Shear-free locally FLRW lattice geometry that permits varying local Hubble rates and spatial curvature while enforcing zero shear.

Load-bearing premise

The shear-free approximation continues to hold when the inflaton velocity drops very low during ultra-slow-roll.

What would settle it

A full numerical relativity simulation of the same linear-potential model during ultra-slow-roll that shows large developing shear would falsify the framework's accuracy.

read the original abstract

Understanding when inflationary perturbations become genuinely nonlinear near the horizon crossing requires methods that go beyond both linear perturbation theory and the gradient expansion. In this work, we introduce a nonlinear lattice framework for single-field inflation based on a shear-free, locally Friedmann-Lema\^itre-Robertson-Walker geometry. This approach captures inhomogeneous local expansion rates, curvature contributions to the local Friedmann equation, and proper-volume weighting at a fraction of the computational cost of full numerical relativity. We construct fully nonlinear $\delta N$ observables on uniform-density slices, together with other practical time-dependent estimators for the curvature perturbations. After validating the framework in a standard slow-roll regime, we apply it to Starobinsky's linear-potential model featuring an intermittent ultra-slow-roll (USR) phase and a sharp potential transition. During this non-attractor USR regime, the lattice captures the separation of curvature perturbation estimators, the growth and subsequent stabilisation of non-Gaussianity, and a transient weakening of the shear-free approximation when the inflaton velocity becomes very small. Our framework provides a practical intermediate approach between rigid background lattice simulations and full numerical relativity, offering a nonlinear bridge between lattice methods, the $\delta N$ formalism, and the stochastic inflation formalism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a nonlinear lattice framework for single-field inflation based on a shear-free, locally FLRW geometry. This approach captures inhomogeneous local expansion rates, curvature contributions to the local Friedmann equation, and proper-volume weighting at reduced computational cost relative to full numerical relativity. It constructs fully nonlinear δN observables on uniform-density slices and other time-dependent curvature estimators. After validation in a standard slow-roll regime, the framework is applied to Starobinsky's linear-potential model with an intermittent ultra-slow-roll phase and sharp potential transition, where it reports separation of curvature estimators, growth and stabilization of non-Gaussianity (f_NL), and a transient weakening of the shear-free approximation when the inflaton velocity becomes small.

Significance. If the central results hold with controlled errors, the framework supplies a practical intermediate tool between rigid background lattice simulations and full numerical relativity. It offers a nonlinear bridge connecting lattice methods, the δN formalism, and stochastic inflation, enabling studies of non-attractor regimes at a fraction of the cost of full GR simulations while retaining inhomogeneous expansion and volume weighting.

major comments (1)
  1. [Starobinsky model application] In the application to Starobinsky's linear-potential model (abstract and results section), the manuscript explicitly reports a transient weakening of the shear-free approximation during the ultra-slow-roll phase when the inflaton velocity drops. However, no quantitative estimate of the induced shear magnitude is supplied, nor is there a controlled comparison to full numerical relativity that bounds the fractional error in the uniform-density δN observables or the non-Gaussianity estimators. Because the headline results on curvature-estimator separation and f_NL growth/stabilization are extracted precisely in this regime, the unquantified breakdown directly threatens the reliability of the central claim that the lattice furnishes a reliable nonlinear bridge.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the precise computational cost reduction factor relative to full numerical relativity, together with the lattice resolution and number of sites used in the presented runs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for recognizing the framework as a practical intermediate tool between lattice simulations and full numerical relativity. We address the major comment on the Starobinsky model application point by point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: In the application to Starobinsky's linear-potential model (abstract and results section), the manuscript explicitly reports a transient weakening of the shear-free approximation during the ultra-slow-roll phase when the inflaton velocity drops. However, no quantitative estimate of the induced shear magnitude is supplied, nor is there a controlled comparison to full numerical relativity that bounds the fractional error in the uniform-density δN observables or the non-Gaussianity estimators. Because the headline results on curvature-estimator separation and f_NL growth/stabilization are extracted precisely in this regime, the unquantified breakdown directly threatens the reliability of the central claim that the lattice furnishes a reliable nonlinear bridge.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a quantitative estimate of the shear magnitude during the ultra-slow-roll phase would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add such an estimate, obtained by computing the local deviation from the shear-free condition via the differences in expansion rates across neighboring lattice sites and the observed inflaton velocity drop. This will be reported as a peak fractional shear-to-expansion ratio together with its duration. Regarding a controlled comparison to full numerical relativity, we note that the single-field setup suppresses anisotropic stress, so the shear remains perturbatively small even when the velocity is low; we will include a brief analytic bound on the resulting fractional error in the δN and f_NL estimators based on this suppression. A direct, side-by-side numerical-relativity validation lies beyond the computational scope of the present work, which focuses on developing the intermediate lattice method itself. We therefore regard the central claims as still reliable once the quantitative shear estimate is supplied, but we accept that the current version would benefit from the added discussion. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A direct controlled comparison to full numerical relativity that quantitatively bounds the fractional error in the uniform-density δN observables and non-Gaussianity estimators during the ultra-slow-roll regime

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; new lattice framework is self-contained

full rationale

The derivation starts from an explicit shear-free locally FLRW ansatz and reduces the Einstein equations to a closed system for the local scale factor and inflaton field. This produces nonlinear δN observables and curvature estimators directly from the lattice evolution without fitting parameters to target data or renaming known results. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the transient weakening of the shear-free condition is reported as an approximation limitation rather than a definitional identity. The framework is therefore independent of prior fitted results or self-citation chains.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework relies on the shear-free approximation and local FLRW geometry as key assumptions for computational efficiency. No free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Shear-free, locally FLRW geometry assumption
    Basis for the lattice framework to capture inhomogeneous expansion rates and curvature contributions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5525 in / 1191 out tokens · 78697 ms · 2026-05-13T22:10:00.298161+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A consistent formulation of stochastic inflation I: Non-Markovian effects and issues beyond linear perturbations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The conventional truncation in stochastic inflation is inconsistent because quadratic-noise contributions are the same perturbative order as the deterministic non-Markovian corrections.

  2. Nonperturbative stochastic inflation in perturbative dynamical background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Derives stochastic equations from Schwinger-Keldysh formalism that include quantum diffusion and classical metric perturbations for non-perturbative ultra-slow-roll inflation, validated on Starobinsky and critical Hig...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

133 extracted references · 133 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Planckcollaboration,Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 571(2014) A16 [1303.5076]. [4]BICEP2, Planckcollaboration,Joint Analysis of BICEP2/KeckArrayandP lanckData, Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 101301 [1502.00612]. [5]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

  2. [2]

    Harrison,Normal modes of vibrations of the universe,Rev

    E.R. Harrison,Normal modes of vibrations of the universe,Rev. Mod. Phys.39(1967) 862

  3. [3]

    Guth and S.-Y

    A.H. Guth and S.-Y. Pi,Fluctuations in the new inflationary universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.49 (1982) 1110

  4. [4]

    Bardeen,Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations,Phys

    J.M. Bardeen,Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 1882

  5. [5]

    Kodama and M

    H. Kodama and M. Sasaki,Cosmological Perturbation Theory,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.78 (1984) 1

  6. [6]

    Mukhanov, H

    V. Mukhanov, H. Feldman and R. Brandenberger,Theory of cosmological perturbations,Physics Reports215(1992) 203

  7. [7]

    Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models

    J.M. Maldacena,Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,JHEP05(2003) 013 [astro-ph/0210603]

  8. [8]

    X. Chen, R. Easther and E.A. Lim,Large Non-Gaussianities in Single Field Inflation,JCAP 06(2007) 023 [astro-ph/0611645]

  9. [9]

    X. Chen, R. Easther and E.A. Lim,Generation and Characterization of Large Non-Gaussianities in Single Field Inflation,JCAP04(2008) 010 [0801.3295]

  10. [10]

    Chen,Primordial Features as Evidence for Inflation,JCAP01(2012) 038 [1104.1323]

    X. Chen,Primordial Features as Evidence for Inflation,JCAP01(2012) 038 [1104.1323]

  11. [11]

    Adshead, C

    P. Adshead, C. Dvorkin, W. Hu and E.A. Lim,Non-Gaussianity from Step Features in the Inflationary Potential,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 023531 [1110.3050]

  12. [12]

    Martin and L

    J. Martin and L. Sriramkumar,The scalar bi-spectrum in the Starobinsky model: The equilateral case,JCAP01(2012) 008 [1109.5838]

  13. [13]

    Chluba, J

    J. Chluba, J. Hamann and S.P. Patil,Features and New Physical Scales in Primordial Observables: Theory and Observation,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24(2015) 1530023 [1505.01834]

  14. [14]

    Antony, F

    A. Antony, F. Finelli, D.K. Hazra and A. Shafieloo,Discordances in Cosmology and the Violation of Slow-Roll Inflationary Dynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 111001 [2202.14028]

  15. [15]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen, D.K. Hazra and L. Pinol,Back to the features: assessing the discriminating power of future CMB missions on inflationary models,JCAP03(2023) 014 [2210.07028]

  16. [16]

    Starobinsky,STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE,Lect

    A.A. Starobinsky,STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE,Lect. Notes Phys.246(1986) 107

  17. [17]

    Equilibrium State of a Massless Self-Interacting Scalar Field in the De Sitter Background

    A.A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama,Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 6357 [astro-ph/9407016]. – 33 –

  18. [18]

    Nonlinear Noise in Cosmology

    S. Habib and H.E. Kandrup,Nonlinear noise in cosmology,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 5303 [gr-qc/9208005]

  19. [19]

    Stariolo,The langevin and fokker-planck equations in the framework of a generalized statistical mechanics,Physics Letters A185(1994) 262

    D.A. Stariolo,The langevin and fokker-planck equations in the framework of a generalized statistical mechanics,Physics Letters A185(1994) 262

  20. [20]

    Tanimura,Stochastic Liouville, Langevin, Fokker–Planck, and Master Equation Approaches to Quantum Dissipative Systems,J

    Y. Tanimura,Stochastic Liouville, Langevin, Fokker–Planck, and Master Equation Approaches to Quantum Dissipative Systems,J. Phys. Soc. Jap.75(2006) 082001

  21. [21]

    Generation of fluctuations during inflation: comparison of stochastic and field-theoretic approaches

    F. Finelli, G. Marozzi, A.A. Starobinsky, G.P. Vacca and G. Venturi,Generation of fluctuations during inflation: Comparison of stochastic and field-theoretic approaches,Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 044007 [0808.1786]

  22. [22]

    Stochastic growth of quantum fluctuations during slow-roll inflation

    F. Finelli, G. Marozzi, A.A. Starobinsky, G.P. Vacca and G. Venturi,Stochastic growth of quantum fluctuations during slow-roll inflation,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 064020 [1003.1327]

  23. [23]

    Yuste, E

    S.B. Yuste, E. Abad and C. Escudero,Diffusion in an expanding medium: Fokker-planck equation, green’s function, and first-passage properties,Phys. Rev. E94(2016) 032118

  24. [24]

    Ezquiaga, J

    J.M. Ezquiaga, J. García-Bellido and V. Vennin,The exponential tail of inflationary fluctuations: consequences for primordial black holes,JCAP03(2020) 029 [1912.05399]

  25. [25]

    Blachier, P

    B. Blachier, P. Auclair, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin,Spatial curvature from super-Hubble cosmological fluctuations,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 123510 [2302.14530]

  26. [26]

    Classical decay of inflaton

    S.Y. Khlebnikov and I.I. Tkachev,Classical decay of inflaton,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 219 [hep-ph/9603378]

  27. [27]

    The Development of Equilibrium After Preheating

    G.N. Felder and L. Kofman,The Development of equilibrium after preheating,Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 103503 [hep-ph/0011160]

  28. [28]

    Khlebnikov and I.I

    S.Y. Khlebnikov and I.I. Tkachev,Relic gravitational waves produced after preheating,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 653 [hep-ph/9701423]

  29. [29]

    Zel’dovich and I.D

    Y.B. Zel’dovich and I.D. Novikov,The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model,Sov. Astron.10(1967) 602

  30. [30]

    Hawking,Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,Mon

    S. Hawking,Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 152(1971) 75

  31. [31]

    Carr and S.W

    B.J. Carr and S.W. Hawking,Black holes in the early Universe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168(1974) 399

  32. [32]

    Carr,The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,Astrophys

    B.J. Carr,The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,Astrophys. J.201(1975) 1

  33. [33]

    Escrivà, F

    A. Escrivà, F. Kuhnel and Y. Tada,Primordial Black Holes,2211.05767

  34. [34]

    LATTICEEASY: A Program for Lattice Simulations of Scalar Fields in an Expanding Universe

    G.N. Felder and I. Tkachev,LATTICEEASY: A Program for lattice simulations of scalar fields in an expanding universe,Comput. Phys. Commun.178(2008) 929 [hep-ph/0011159]

  35. [35]

    Easther, H

    R. Easther, H. Finkel and N. Roth,PSpectRe: A Pseudo-Spectral Code for (P)reheating,JCAP 10(2010) 025 [1005.1921]

  36. [36]

    Figueroa, A

    D.G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti and W. Valkenburg,CosmoLattice: A modern code for lattice simulations of scalar and gauge field dynamics in an expanding universe,Comput. Phys. Commun.283(2023) 108586 [2102.01031]

  37. [37]

    InflationEasy: A C++ Lattice Code for Inflation

    A. Caravano,InflationEasy: A C++ Lattice Code for Inflation,2506.11797

  38. [38]

    Caravano, E

    A. Caravano, E. Komatsu, K.D. Lozanov and J. Weller,Lattice simulations of axion-U(1) inflation,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 043504 [2204.12874]

  39. [39]

    Figueroa, J

    D.G. Figueroa, J. Lizarraga, A. Urio and J. Urrestilla,Strong Backreaction Regime in Axion Inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 151003 [2303.17436]. – 34 –

  40. [40]

    Figueroa, J

    D.G. Figueroa, J. Lizarraga, N. Loayza, A. Urio and J. Urrestilla,Nonlinear dynamics of axion inflation: A detailed lattice study,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 063545 [2411.16368]

  41. [41]

    Sharma, A

    R. Sharma, A. Brandenburg, K. Subramanian and A. Vikman,Lattice simulations of axion-U(1) inflation: gravitational waves, magnetic fields, and scalar statistics,JCAP05(2025) 079 [2411.04854]

  42. [42]

    Caravano, G

    A. Caravano, G. Franciolini and S. Renaux-Petel,Ultraslow-roll inflation on the lattice: Backreaction and nonlinear effects,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 063518 [2410.23942]

  43. [43]

    Caravano, K

    A. Caravano, K. Inomata and S. Renaux-Petel,Inflationary Butterfly Effect: Nonperturbative Dynamics from Small-Scale Features,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 151001 [2403.12811]

  44. [44]

    Caravano, G

    A. Caravano, G. Franciolini and S. Renaux-Petel,Ultraslow-roll inflation on the lattice. II. Nonperturbative curvature perturbation,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083508 [2506.11795]

  45. [45]

    DEFROST: A New Code for Simulating Preheating after Inflation

    A.V. Frolov,DEFROST: A New Code for Simulating Preheating after Inflation,JCAP11 (2008) 009 [0809.4904]

  46. [46]

    Huang,The Art of Lattice and Gravity Waves from Preheating,Phys

    Z. Huang,The Art of Lattice and Gravity Waves from Preheating,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 123509 [1102.0227]

  47. [47]

    Kawaguchi, T

    R. Kawaguchi, T. Fujita and M. Sasaki,Highly asymmetric probability distribution from a finite-width upward step during inflation,JCAP11(2023) 021 [2305.18140]

  48. [48]

    Shibata and T

    M. Shibata and T. Nakamura,Evolution of three-dimensional gravitational waves: Harmonic slicing case,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 5428

  49. [49]

    On the Numerical Integration of Einstein's Field Equations

    T.W. Baumgarte and S.L. Shapiro,On the numerical integration of Einstein’s field equations, Phys. Rev. D59(1998) 024007 [gr-qc/9810065]

  50. [50]

    W.E. East, M. Kleban, A. Linde and L. Senatore,Beginning inflation in an inhomogeneous universe,JCAP09(2016) 010 [1511.05143]

  51. [51]

    Clough, E.A

    K. Clough, E.A. Lim, B.S. DiNunno, W. Fischler, R. Flauger and S. Paban,Robustness of Inflation to Inhomogeneous Initial Conditions,JCAP09(2017) 025 [1608.04408]

  52. [52]

    Bloomfield, P

    J.K. Bloomfield, P. Fitzpatrick, K. Hilbert and D.I. Kaiser,Onset of inflation amid backreaction from inhomogeneities,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 063512 [1906.08651]

  53. [53]

    Joana and S

    C. Joana and S. Clesse,Inhomogeneous preinflation across Hubble scales in full general relativity,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 083501 [2011.12190]

  54. [54]

    Aurrekoetxea, K

    J.C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, R. Flauger and E.A. Lim,The Effects of Potential Shape on Inhomogeneous Inflation,JCAP05(2020) 030 [1910.12547]

  55. [55]

    Elley, J.C

    M. Elley, J.C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, R. Flauger, P. Giannadakis and E.A. Lim,Robustness of inflation to kinetic inhomogeneities,JCAP01(2025) 050 [2405.03490]

  56. [56]

    Aurrekoetxea, K

    J.C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough and F. Muia,Oscillon formation during inflationary preheating with general relativity,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 023501 [2304.01673]

  57. [57]

    Giblin and A.J

    J.T. Giblin and A.J. Tishue,Preheating in Full General Relativity,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 063543 [1907.10601]

  58. [58]

    X.-X. Kou, C. Tian and S.-Y. Zhou,Oscillon Preheating in Full General Relativity,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 045005 [1912.09658]

  59. [59]

    Adshead, J.T

    P. Adshead, J.T. Giblin, R. Grutkoski and Z.J. Weiner,Gauge preheating with full general relativity,JCAP03(2024) 017 [2311.01504]

  60. [60]

    Grutkoski, H.J

    R. Grutkoski, H.J. Macpherson, J.T. Giblin, Jr. and J. Frieman,Effect of nonlinear gravity on the cosmological background during preheating,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 023541 [2504.08939]

  61. [61]

    Aurrekoetxea, K

    J.C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough and E.A. Lim,Cosmology using numerical relativity,Living Rev. Rel.28(2025) 5 [2409.01939]. – 35 –

  62. [62]

    Launay, G.I

    Y.L. Launay, G.I. Rigopoulos and E.P.S. Shellard,Stochastic inflation in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 123523 [2401.08530]

  63. [63]

    Stochastic Inflation in Numerical Relativity

    Y.L. Launay, G.I. Rigopoulos and E.P.S. Shellard,Stochastic Inflation in Numerical Relativity, 2512.14649

  64. [64]

    Mizuguchi, T

    Y. Mizuguchi, T. Murata and Y. Tada,STOLAS: STOchastic LAttice Simulation of cosmic inflation,JCAP12(2024) 050 [2405.10692]

  65. [65]

    Murata and Y

    T. Murata and Y. Tada,STOchastic LAttice Simulation of hybrid inflation,2603.04850

  66. [66]

    Jackson, H

    J.H.P. Jackson, H. Assadullahi, K. Koyama, V. Vennin and D. Wands,Numerical simulations of stochastic inflation using importance sampling,JCAP10(2022) 067 [2206.11234]

  67. [67]

    Mahbub and A

    R. Mahbub and A. De,Smooth coarse-graining and colored noise dynamics in stochastic inflation,JCAP09(2022) 045 [2204.03859]

  68. [68]

    Jackson, H

    J.H.P. Jackson, H. Assadullahi, A.D. Gow, K. Koyama, V. Vennin and D. Wands,Stochastic inflation beyond slow roll: noise modelling and importance sampling,JCAP04(2025) 073 [2410.13683]

  69. [69]

    Cruces, C

    D. Cruces, C. Germani, A. Nassiri-Rad and M. Yamaguchi,Small noise expansion of stochastic inflation,JCAP04(2025) 090 [2410.17987]

  70. [70]

    Briaud, R

    V. Briaud, R. Kawaguchi and V. Vennin,Stochastic inflation with gradient interactions,JCAP 12(2025) 024 [2509.05124]

  71. [71]

    Ahmadi and M

    Z. Ahmadi and M. Noorbala,Deviations from Gaussian White Noise in Stochastic Inflation, 2512.17070

  72. [72]

    Kawasaki and T

    M. Kawasaki and T. Kuroda,Numerical simulation of the stochastic formalism including non-Markovianity,2602.11652

  73. [73]

    LATTICEEASY

    G. Felder and I. Tkachev, “LATTICEEASY.” https://www.felderbooks.com/latticeeasy/index.html, 2007

  74. [74]

    Figueroa, A

    D.G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti and W. Valkenburg,The art of simulating the early Universe – Part I,JCAP04(2021) 035 [2006.15122]

  75. [75]

    The Dynamics of General Relativity

    R.L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C.W. Misner,The Dynamics of general relativity,Gen. Rel. Grav. 40(2008) 1997 [gr-qc/0405109]

  76. [76]

    Sugiyama, E

    N.S. Sugiyama, E. Komatsu and T. Futamase,δN formalism,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 023530 [1208.1073]

  77. [77]

    Garriga, Y

    J. Garriga, Y. Urakawa and F. Vernizzi,δNformalism from superpotential and holography, JCAP02(2016) 036 [1509.07339]

  78. [78]

    Tanaka and Y

    T. Tanaka and Y. Urakawa,Anisotropic separate universe and Weinberg’s adiabatic mode, JCAP07(2021) 051 [2101.05707]

  79. [79]

    Starobinsky,Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky,Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,Phys. Lett.117B(1982) 175

  80. [80]

    Starobinsky,Multicomponent de Sitter (Inflationary) Stages and the Generation of Perturbations,JETP Lett.42(1985) 152

    A.A. Starobinsky,Multicomponent de Sitter (Inflationary) Stages and the Generation of Perturbations,JETP Lett.42(1985) 152

Showing first 80 references.