Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 8 cited by

Colored-graph trace invariants fully label multipartite LU orbits of GHZ-built states and decide their LO order by integer divisibility.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 13:52 UTC pith:R3MVDIBF

load-bearing objection Solid combinatorial solution of LU and LO classification for an infinite multipartite family (HT states) that already covers pure tripartite stabilizers; LOCC remains partial.

arxiv 2604.02269 v2 pith:R3MVDIBF submitted 2026-04-02 math-ph hep-thmath.MPquant-ph

Tensor invariants for multipartite entanglement classification

Sylvain Carrozza , Johann Chevrier , Luca Lionni This is my paper
classification math-ph hep-thmath.MPquant-ph MSC 81P4081P4515A6905C15
keywords multipartite entanglementtrace invariantscolored graphslocal unitary orbitshypergraph-tensor statesLO preorderlarge-N asymptoticsrandom tensors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Multipartite entanglement is hard to classify because pure states are tensors, not matrices, so ordinary spectra no longer separate local-unitary orbits. The paper shows that a complete set of polynomial invariants of those tensors can be read off from bipartite edge-colored graphs (trace-invariants). Inside an infinite family of reference states assembled from GHZ blocks of arbitrary size (hypergraph-tensor states), a short list of those invariants—multi-entropies and reflected multi-entropies—already separates every orbit and recovers an integer weight function that labels the class. The same weight function decides the entire preorder under local operations: one state can be converted into another if and only if its weights divide the target weights. At large local dimension the leading and sub-leading asymptotics of the same invariants further distinguish these states from one another and from Haar-random states by purely combinatorial quantities (Gurau degree, degree of compatibility, etc.). The result supplies a concrete, graph-theoretic dictionary for an otherwise intractable multipartite classification problem.

Core claim

For the infinite family of hypergraph-tensor states built from GHZ blocks, the LU orbit of each state is uniquely labelled by an integer-valued weight function α on subsets of parties; that function is completely recovered from the values of multi-entropy and reflected multi-entropy invariants; and under local operations one such state converts into another if and only if α divides β.

What carries the argument

Trace-invariants Tr_G labelled by D-edge-colored bipartite graphs: each graph encodes a contraction pattern of copies of a pure-state tensor with its conjugate, yielding a local-unitary polynomial whose values separate orbits and generate monotones.

Load-bearing premise

All complete classification and LO-order theorems are proved only inside the special family of states assembled from GHZ blocks; outside that family the paper supplies only necessary conditions and existence of a finite but impractically large generating set.

What would settle it

Exhibit two hypergraph-tensor states whose multi-entropy and reflected multi-entropy vectors coincide yet whose weight functions differ, or two states for which α divides β yet no LO protocol converts one into the other.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a systematic combinatorial framework for multipartite entanglement classification based on trace-invariants of pure states, which are in one-to-one correspondence with D-colored graphs. It shows that these invariants separate LU orbits in general (Prop. 2.8), characterize separability and partial separability (Thm. 2.18, Prop. 2.23), and yield LO monotones (Cor. 2.33). Restricting to an infinite family of hypergraph-tensor (HT) states built from GHZ blocks, the authors prove that multi-entropies and reflected multi-entropies completely recover the integer weight functions that label LU orbits (Thm. 3.4), and that the LO preorder on HT states is exactly divisibility of those weight functions (Thm. 5.3). Partial sufficient conditions for LOCC are given, and large-N scaling of the same invariants is expressed via combinatorial quantities (Gurau degree, degree of compatibility, p-complete degree) that distinguish HT states from each other and from Haar-random states. Binary operations on graphs and recursive control of the degree of compatibility are developed in Sec. 6.

Significance. If the theorems hold, the work supplies the first complete, explicit LO classification for a nontrivial infinite family of multipartite pure states, together with a practical finite set of invariants that separate their LU orbits. The combinatorial encoding via colored graphs imports mature tools from random-tensor theory (faces, jackets, Gurau degree, degree of compatibility) into entanglement theory and yields new LO monotones that generalize Rényi entropies. The large-N analysis and the non-factorization argument (Prop. 3.6) clarify why multipartite Haar states cannot be approximated by deterministic HT states even at leading order. Machine-checkable combinatorial proofs and explicit graph families make the results reproducible and extendable. The restriction to HT states is clearly stated; the broader claims remain necessary conditions or existence statements, so the paper does not overclaim.

minor comments (4)
  1. The manuscript is very long; a short “reader’s map” at the end of the introduction that flags which sections are essential for Thms. 3.4 and 5.3 versus which are optional combinatorial digressions would improve accessibility.
  2. Notation for the weight function α and the associated state |ψ_α⟩ is introduced gradually; a single display equation collecting the definition (145) and the evaluation formula (148) early in Sec. 3.2 would help.
  3. Several figures (e.g., Fig. 30 and the lattice constructions) are dense; adding a short caption sentence that states the precise combinatorial property being illustrated would aid the reader.
  4. The companion paper [53] is cited for the full proofs of Props. 6.11 and 6.18; a one-sentence statement of the precise hypotheses that remain in [53] would make the present text self-contained for the large-N entropy claims.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: HT weight functions are defined independently of the invariants that recover them, and LO/LOCC results follow by direct evaluation.

full rationale

The paper defines hypergraph-tensor (HT) states via weight functions α that assign integer dimensions to GHZ blocks (Eq. (145)); these are independent combinatorial data. Trace-invariants are then evaluated on those states by the explicit product formula (148). Theorem 3.4 recovers α from multi-entropy and reflected multi-entropy evaluations by solving a linear system (162)–(168) whose coefficients are combinatorial (numbers of connected components of coloured subgraphs). Theorem 5.3 characterises the LO preorder by divisibility of the same weight functions, obtained by specialising the general LO criterion of Prop. 2.28 to infinite families of coloured graphs introduced in Sec. 3.1. Combinatorial quantities (Gurau degree, degree of compatibility, p-complete degree, etc.) are either taken from the existing random-tensor literature or defined by explicit min/max formulae; none is fitted to the target classification. Self-citations to companion works supply technical lemmas on large-N factorisation and tree-like graphs, but the central LU and LO statements for HT states are proved self-containedly inside the present manuscript. No step reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 2 invented entities

The paper works entirely inside standard finite-dimensional quantum information and the combinatorial theory of colored graphs. No free parameters are fitted; the only modeling choice is the restriction to the HT family (and its large-N scaling class). Background facts (Stinespring dilation, Schur–Weyl duality, known non-negativity of Gurau degree, Weingarten calculus) are standard. The p-complete degree and the degree of compatibility are either new or taken from recent literature with explicit definitions.

axioms (4)
  • standard math Stinespring dilation: every LO map is realized by a local isometry into an ancilla followed by a partial trace.
    Used in Prop. 2.28 to convert LO convertibility into an equality of all connected trace-invariants.
  • standard math Schur–Weyl duality: the commutant of U(H)⊗k is spanned by permutation operators.
    Used in Prop. 2.7 to prove that connected trace-invariants generate the full LU-invariant algebra.
  • domain assumption Non-negativity of the Gurau degree ω₂ and of the c-degree Ω_c for colored graphs.
    Taken from the random-tensor literature and used throughout Sec. 4 to obtain scaling inequalities.
  • domain assumption Large-N non-factorization of certain connected correlators of Gaussian/Haar tensors of order D≥3 (Ref. [31]).
    Invoked in Prop. 3.6 to prove that no deterministic sequence can be LU-equivalent in scaling to the Haar-random multipartite state.
invented entities (2)
  • p-complete degree ω_p no independent evidence
    purpose: Generalizes the Gurau degree so that the large-N scaling of an arbitrary p-complete HT state is expressed by a single non-negative combinatorial integer.
    Defined in Eq. (215) and shown non-negative in App. B; no independent experimental handle is claimed.
  • Hypergraph-tensor (HT) states / weight functions α independent evidence
    purpose: Provide an infinite, combinatorially tractable family of multipartite pure states on which complete LU and LO classifications become possible.
    Already present in earlier literature under related names; the paper supplies the canonical weight-function presentation and proves it labels LU orbits.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 71161 in / 3033 out tokens · 26694 ms · 2026-07-13T13:52:36.836651+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Organising the space of entanglement structures of a multipartite quantum system is a much more challenging task than its bipartite version: while the local unitary (LU) orbit of a bipartite pure state can be conveniently characterized by its entanglement spectrum, invariants of multipartite entanglement structures are comparatively difficult to define and work with. The root cause of this difference is that the bipartite problem can be reduced to the analysis of matrix invariants, while its multipartite version is governed by a much richer space of tensor invariants. The present work explores the latter through the lens of so-called trace-invariants, which are in one-to-one correspondence with combinatorial objects known as colored graphs. We first explain why trace-invariant evaluations can serve as labels of LU-orbits of multipartite pure states, how this strategy extends to random states, and how the effect of local operations (LO) can be analyzed through such data. We then focus on entanglement classification within an (infinite-dimensional) subspace of reference states, whose basic building blocks are GHZ states of various dimensions. We show that relatively simple subclasses of trace-invariants are sufficient to separate the LU-orbits of reference states, and enable a complete (resp. an incomplete) characterization of their relations in the LO (resp. LOCC) resource theory of entanglement. Finally, we investigate how a (still infinite) subclass of reference states of local dimension N can be efficiently distinguished at leading and subleading orders in an asymptotic large-N expansion (among themselves, or from Haar-random states). This analysis relies crucially on combinatorial quantities associated to colored graphs, some of which have already played instrumental roles in the recent literature on random tensors. Results of broader relevance are reported along the way.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multi-entropy in random tensor networks

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    For n=2, Rényi multi-entropies in RTNs are determined by minimal multiway cuts; the minimal multiway cut conjecture fails for integer n>2 with explicit counterexamples.

  2. Large $N$ factorization of families of tensor trace-invariants

    math-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Families of complex tensor trace-invariants with tree-like dominant pairings factorize at large N, allowing computation of typical multipartite Rényi entropies for uniform random states.

  3. Structural Obstruction to Replica Symmetry Breaking for Multi-Entropy in Random Tensor Networks

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Multi-entropy exhibits a structural obstruction to replica symmetry breaking in random tensor networks due to incompatible boundary permutations in the replica hypercube, unlike entanglement negativity.

  4. Additional constraints for the tensor bootstrap

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    New positivity constraints from open bubbles and color matrices provide sharp bounds on unitary tensor integrals at finite N and probe deviations from Gaussian universality.

  5. Local qubit invariants on quantum computer

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Two methods are introduced for quantum circuits that directly measure local unitary invariants of three qubits, with demonstrations on IBM Quantum hardware for entanglement measures.

  6. Separability from Multipartite Measures

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Third-order negativity is a necessary and sufficient criterion for full separability of tripartite pure states and extends to mixed states and qudits.

  7. Properties of tensorial free cumulants

    math-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The authors extend tensorial free cumulants to arbitrary orders, connect prior frameworks, and compute non-trivial examples for Gaussian tensors with structured covariances.

  8. Separability from Multipartite Measures

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Third-order negativity provides a necessary and sufficient criterion for full separability of tripartite pure states, with generalizations to mixed states, qudits, and an application to conformal field theory.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?

    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen. “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?” In:Phys. Rev.47 (10 May 1935), pp. 777–780.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777.url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777.url: 1935

  2. [2]

    On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox

    J. S. Bell. “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox”. In:Physics Physique Fizika1 (3 Nov. 1964), pp. 195– 200.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysicsPhysiqueFizika . 1 . 195.url:https : / / link . aps . org / doi / 10 . 1103 / PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195

    1964

  3. [3]

    Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories

    John F. Clauser et al. “Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (15 Oct. 1969), pp. 880–884.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 1969

  4. [4]

    Experimental Test of Bell’s Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers

    Alain Aspect, Jean Dalibard, and G´ erard Roger. “Experimental Test of Bell’s Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.49 (25 Dec. 1982), pp. 1804–1807.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49. 1804.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1804

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49 1982

  5. [5]

    Quantum entanglement

    Ryszard Horodecki et al. “Quantum entanglement”. In:Rev. Mod. Phys.81 (2009), pp. 865–942.doi:10. 1103/RevModPhys.81.865. arXiv:quant-ph/0702225

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    Multi-partite entanglement

    Michael Walter, David Gross, and Jens Eisert. “Multi-partite entanglement”. In: (Dec. 2016). arXiv:1612. 02437 [quant-ph]

    2016

  7. [7]

    Razvan Gurau.Random tensors. eng. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2017.isbn: 9780198787938

    2017

  8. [8]

    Colored Tensor Models - a review

    Razvan Gurau and James P. Ryan. “Colored Tensor Models - a review”. In:SIGMA8 (2012), p. 020.doi: 10.3842/SIGMA.2012.020. arXiv:1109.4812 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3842/sigma.2012.020 2012

  9. [9]

    Quantum resource theories

    Eric Chitambar and Gilad Gour. “Quantum resource theories”. In:Rev. Mod. Phys.91.2 (2019), p. 025001. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.025001. arXiv:1806.06107 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.025001 2019

  10. [10]

    A mathematical theory of resources

    Bob Coecke, Tobias Fritz, and Robert W. Spekkens. “A mathematical theory of resources”. In:Inform. and Comput.250 (2016), pp. 59–86.doi:10.1016/j.ic.2016.02.008. arXiv:1409.5531 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ic.2016.02.008 2016

  11. [11]

    Quantum nonlocality without entanglement

    Charles H. Bennett et al. “Quantum nonlocality without entanglement”. In:Phys. Rev. A59 (2 Feb. 1999), pp. 1070–1091.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.59.1070.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA. 59.1070

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.59.1070.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/physreva 1999

  12. [12]

    Conditions for a Class of Entanglement Transformations

    M. A. Nielsen. “Conditions for a Class of Entanglement Transformations”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (2 July 1999), pp. 436–439.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.436.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.83.436

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.436.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ 1999

  13. [13]

    Entanglement-Assisted Local Manipulation of Pure Quantum States

    Daniel Jonathan and Martin B. Plenio. “Entanglement-Assisted Local Manipulation of Pure Quantum States”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (17 Oct. 1999), pp. 3566–3569.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 83 . 3566. url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3566

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3566 1999

  14. [14]

    Catalytic Transformations of Pure Entan- gled States

    Tulja Varun Kondra, Chandan Datta, and Alexander Streltsov. “Catalytic Transformations of Pure Entan- gled States”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (15 Oct. 2021), p. 150503.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.150503. url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.150503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.150503 2021

  15. [15]

    Everything You Always Wanted to Know About LOCC (But Were Afraid to Ask)

    Eric Chitambar et al. “Everything You Always Wanted to Know About LOCC (But Were Afraid to Ask)”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics328.1 (May 2014), pp. 303–326.issn: 1432-0916.doi:10 . 1007/s00220-014-1953-9.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-014-1953-9

    doi:10.1007/s00220-014-1953-9 2014

  16. [16]

    Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations

    Charles H. Bennett et al. “Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations”. In:Phys. Rev. A53 (4 Apr. 1996), pp. 2046–2052.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2046.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.53.2046

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2046.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ 1996

  17. [17]

    Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction

    Charles H. Bennett et al. “Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction”. In:Phys. Rev. A54 (5 Nov. 1996), pp. 3824–3851.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3824.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.54.3824

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10 1996

  18. [18]

    Quantum coding

    Benjamin Schumacher. “Quantum coding”. In:Phys. Rev. A51 (4 Apr. 1995), pp. 2738–2747.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.51.2738.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.51.2738

    doi:10.1103/physreva.51.2738 1995

  19. [19]

    Thermodynamics and the measure of entanglement

    Sandu Popescu and Daniel Rohrlich. “Thermodynamics and the measure of entanglement”. In:Phys. Rev. A56 (5 Nov. 1997), R3319–R3321.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.56.R3319.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.R3319. 104

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.56.r3319.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 1997

  20. [20]

    Separability of Mixed Quantum States: Linear Contractions and Permutation Criteria

    Micha l Horodecki, Pawe l Horodecki, and Ryszard Horodecki. “Separability of Mixed Quantum States: Linear Contractions and Permutation Criteria”. In:Open Systems & Information Dynamics13.1 (Mar. 2006), pp. 103–111.issn: 1573-1324.doi:10 . 1007 / s11080 - 006 - 7271 - 8.url:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1007 / s11080-006-7271-8

    2006

  21. [21]

    Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory

    Pasquale Calabrese and John Cardy. “Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory”. In:Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2004.06 (June 2004), P06002.issn: 1742-5468.doi:10.1088/ 1742-5468/2004/06/p06002.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2004/06/P06002

    doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2004/06/p06002 2004

  22. [22]

    Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system

    Rajibul Islam et al. “Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system”. In:Nature528.7580 (Dec. 2015), pp. 77–83.issn: 1476-4687.doi:10.1038/nature15750.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature15750

    work page doi:10.1038/nature15750.url:https://doi.org/10.1038/ 2015

  23. [23]

    Entanglement Spectrum as a Generalization of Entanglement Entropy: Identification of Topological Order in Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Effect States

    Hui Li and F. D. M. Haldane. “Entanglement Spectrum as a Generalization of Entanglement Entropy: Identification of Topological Order in Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Effect States”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.101 (1 July 2008), p. 010504.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.010504.url:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.010504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.010504.url:https://link.aps.org/ 2008

  24. [24]

    Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions

    Micha l Horodecki, Pawe l Horodecki, and Ryszard Horodecki. “Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions”. In:Physics Letters A223.1 (1996), pp. 1–8.issn: 0375-9601.doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0375- 9601(96)00706- 2.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0375960196007062

    doi:10.1016/s0375- 1996

  25. [25]

    Information-theoretic aspects of inseparability of mixed states

    Ryszard Horodecki and Michal/ Horodecki. “Information-theoretic aspects of inseparability of mixed states”. In:Phys. Rev. A54 (3 Sept. 1996), pp. 1838–1843.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevA . 54 . 1838.url:https : //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.1838

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1838 1996

  26. [26]

    Entropy inequalities and Bell inequalities for two-qubit systems

    Emilio Santos. “Entropy inequalities and Bell inequalities for two-qubit systems”. In:Phys. Rev. A69 (2 Feb. 2004), p. 022305.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.69.022305.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.69.022305

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.69.022305.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ 2004

  27. [27]

    Catalytic transformations for bipartite pure states

    S Turgut. “Catalytic transformations for bipartite pure states”. In:Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical40.40 (Sept. 2007), p. 12185.doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/40/012.url:https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1751-8113/40/40/012

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/40/012.url:https://doi.org/ 2007

  28. [28]

    Inequalities that Collectively Completely Characterize the Catalytic Majorization Rela- tion

    Matthew Klimesh. “Inequalities that Collectively Completely Characterize the Catalytic Majorization Rela- tion”. In: (Sept. 2007). arXiv:0709.3680 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  29. [29]

    Average entropy of a subsystem

    Don N. Page. “Average entropy of a subsystem”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.71 (1993), pp. 1291–1294.doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.71.1291. arXiv:gr-qc/9305007

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  30. [30]

    Holographic duality from random tensor networks

    Patrick Hayden et al. “Holographic duality from random tensor networks”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2016.11 (Nov. 2016).issn: 1029-8479.doi:10.1007/jhep11(2016)009.url:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/JHEP11(2016)009

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2016)009.url:http://dx.doi.org/ 2016

  31. [31]

    The large N factorization does not hold for arbitrary multi-trace observables in random tensors

    Razvan Gurau, Felix Joos, and Benjamin Sudakov. “The large N factorization does not hold for arbitrary multi-trace observables in random tensors”. In:Lett. Math. Phys.115.4 (2025), p. 93.doi:10.1007/s11005- 025-01983-4. arXiv:2506.15362 [math-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s11005- 2025

  32. [32]

    Low order maximally single-trace graphs as the first counterex- amples to large N factorization in random tensors

    Jonathan Berthold and Hannes Keppler. “Low order maximally single-trace graphs as the first counterex- amples to large N factorization in random tensors”. In: (2026). arXiv:2603.08638 [math-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    An algebraically independent generating set of the algebra of local unitary invariants

    Peter Vrana. “An algebraically independent generating set of the algebra of local unitary invariants”. In: (Feb. 2011). arXiv:1102.2861 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  34. [34]

    A Complete Set of Invariants for LU-Equivalence of Density Operators

    Jacob Turner and Jason Morton. “A Complete Set of Invariants for LU-Equivalence of Density Operators”. In:Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications(May 2017).issn: 1815-0659.doi: 10.3842/sigma.2017.028.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2017.028

    work page doi:10.3842/sigma.2017.028.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/sigma.2017.028 2017

  35. [35]

    Holographic entanglement negativity and replica symmetry breaking

    Xi Dong, Xiao-Liang Qi, and Michael Walter. “Holographic entanglement negativity and replica symmetry breaking”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2021.6 (June 2021), p. 24.issn: 1029-8479.doi:10.1007/ JHEP06(2021)024.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2021)024

    doi:10.1007/jhep06(2021)024 2021

  36. [36]

    Negativity spectra in random tensor networks and holography

    Jonah Kudler-Flam, Vladimir Narovlansky, and Shinsei Ryu. “Negativity spectra in random tensor networks and holography”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2022.2 (Feb. 2022).issn: 1029-8479.doi:10.1007/ jhep02(2022)076.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2022)076. 105

    doi:10.1007/jhep02(2022)076 2022

  37. [37]

    Reflected entropy in random tensor networks

    Chris Akers et al. “Reflected entropy in random tensor networks”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2022.5 (May 2022), p. 162.issn: 1029-8479.doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)162.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/ JHEP05(2022)162

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2022)162.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/ 2022

  38. [38]

    Fun with replicas: tripartitions in tensor networks and gravity

    Geoff Penington, Michael Walter, and Freek Witteveen. “Fun with replicas: tripartitions in tensor networks and gravity”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2023.5 (May 2023).issn: 1029-8479.doi:10 . 1007 / jhep05(2023)008.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2023)008

    doi:10.1007/jhep05(2023)008 2023

  39. [39]

    New multipartite entanglement measure and its holographic dual

    Abhijit Gadde, Vineeth Krishna, and Trakshu Sharma. “New multipartite entanglement measure and its holographic dual”. In:Physical Review D106.12 (Dec. 2022).issn: 2470-0029.doi:10.1103/physrevd. 106.126001.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.126001

    doi:10.1103/physrevd 2022

  40. [40]

    Towards a classification of holographic multi-partite entanglement measures

    Abhijit Gadde, Vineeth Krishna, and Trakshu Sharma. “Towards a classification of holographic multi-partite entanglement measures”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2023.8 (Aug. 2023).issn: 1029-8479.doi: 10.1007/jhep08(2023)202.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2023)202

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2023)202.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/jhep08(2023)202 2023

  41. [41]

    June 2025

    Abhijit Gadde, Shraiyance Jain, and Harshal Kulkarni.Multi-partite entanglement monotones. June 2025. arXiv:2406.17447 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Counting tensor model observables and branched covers of the 2-sphere

    Joseph Ben Geloun and Sanjaye Ramgoolam. “Counting tensor model observables and branched covers of the 2-sphere”. In:Ann. Inst. H. Poincare D Comb. Phys. Interact.1.1 (2014), pp. 77–138.doi:10.4171/aihpd/4. arXiv:1307.6490 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4171/aihpd/4 2014

  43. [43]

    Nondeterministic quantum communication complexity: the cyclic equality game and iterated matrix multiplication

    Harry Buhrman, Matthias Christandl, and Jeroen Zuiddam. “Nondeterministic quantum communication complexity: the cyclic equality game and iterated matrix multiplication”. In: Apr. 2016.doi:10 . 4230 / LIPIcs.ITCS.2017.24. arXiv:1603.03757 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Entanglement distillation from Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger shares

    P´ eter Vrana and Matthias Christandl. “Entanglement distillation from Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger shares”. In:Commun. Math. Phys.352 (2017), pp. 621–627.doi:10.1007/s00220-017-2861-6. arXiv:1603.03964 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00220-017-2861-6 2017

  45. [45]

    Tensor surgery and tensor rank

    Matthias Christandl and Jeroen Zuiddam. “Tensor surgery and tensor rank”. In:Comp. Complexity28.1 (2019), pp. 27–56.doi:10.1007/s00037-018-0164-8. arXiv:1606.04085 [math.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00037-018-0164-8 2019

  46. [46]

    Asymptotic tensor rank of graph tensors: beyond matrix multiplication

    Matthias Christandl, P´ eter Vrana, and Jeroen Zuiddam. “Asymptotic tensor rank of graph tensors: beyond matrix multiplication”. In: (Sept. 2019).doi:10.1007/s00037-018-0172-8. arXiv:1609.07476 [math.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00037-018-0172-8 2019

  47. [47]

    arXiv:2602.11975 [cs.CC].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11975

    Cornelius Brand et al.Beyond Bilinear Complexity: What Works and What Breaks with Many Modes?2026. arXiv:2602.11975 [cs.CC].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11975

    arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    Tripartite Entanglement in Qudit Stabilizer States and Appli- cation in Quantum Error Correction

    Shiang Yong Looi and Robert B. Griffiths. “Tripartite Entanglement in Qudit Stabilizer States and Appli- cation in Quantum Error Correction”. In:Phys. Rev. A84 (2011), p. 052306.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84. 052306. arXiv:1107.1761 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.84 2011

  49. [49]

    Multipartite Entanglement in Stabilizer Tensor Networks

    Sepehr Nezami and Michael Walter. “Multipartite Entanglement in Stabilizer Tensor Networks”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020), p. 241602.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.241602. arXiv:1608.02595 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.241602 2020

  50. [50]

    Benoit Collins, Razvan Gurau, and Luca Lionni.Free cumulants and freeness for unitarily invariant random tensors. Oct. 2024. arXiv:2410.00908 [math-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Reflected Multientropy and Its Holographic Dual

    Ma-Ke Yuan, Mingyi Li, and Yang Zhou. “Reflected Multientropy and Its Holographic Dual”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.135 (9 Aug. 2025), p. 091604.doi:10.1103/76vs-rxcs.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ 76vs-rxcs

    work page doi:10.1103/76vs-rxcs.url:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ 2025

  52. [52]

    Multipartite Markov gaps and entanglement wedge multiway cuts

    Norihiro Iizuka, Akihiro Miyata, and Mitsuhiro Nishida. “Multipartite Markov gaps and entanglement wedge multiway cuts”. In:JHEP10 (2025), p. 148.doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2025)148. arXiv:2507.15262 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2025)148 2025

  53. [53]

    LargeNfactorization of families of tensor trace- invariants

    Sylvain Carrozza, Johann Chevrier, and Luca Lionni. “LargeNfactorization of families of tensor trace- invariants”. In: (May 2026). arXiv:2605.12468 [math-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    A New Large N Expansion for General Matrix– Tensor Models

    Frank Ferrari, Vincent Rivasseau, and Guillaume Valette. “A New Large N Expansion for General Matrix– Tensor Models”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics370.2 (Sept. 2019), pp. 403–448.issn: 1432- 0916.doi:10.1007/s00220-019-03511-7.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03511-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-019-03511-7.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03511-7 2019

  55. [55]

    Polynomial invariants of quantum codes

    E.M. Rains. “Polynomial invariants of quantum codes”. In:IEEE Transactions on Information Theory46.1 (2000), pp. 54–59.doi:10.1109/18.817508

    work page doi:10.1109/18.817508 2000

  56. [56]

    Computing local invariants of quantum-bit systems

    Markus Grassl, Martin R¨ otteler, and Thomas Beth. “Computing local invariants of quantum-bit systems”. In:Phys. Rev. A58 (3 Sept. 1998), pp. 1833–1839.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevA . 58 . 1833.url:https : //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.58.1833. 106

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.58.1833 1998

  57. [57]

    Hero, Jeb F

    Michael W. Hero, Jeb F. Willenbring, and Lauren Kelly Williams.The measurement of quantum entangle- ment and enumeration of graph coverings. 2011. arXiv:0911.0222 [math.RT].url:https://arxiv.org/ abs/0911.0222

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  58. [58]

    On the algebra of local unitary invariants of pure and mixed quantum states

    Peter Vrana. “On the algebra of local unitary invariants of pure and mixed quantum states”. In:Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical44.22 (2011), p. 225304.doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/22/225304. arXiv:1101.2514 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/22/225304 2011

  59. [59]

    Positive maps and trace polynomials from the symmetric group

    Felix Huber. “Positive maps and trace polynomials from the symmetric group”. In:Journal of Mathematical Physics62.2 (Feb. 2021), p. 022203.issn: 0022-2488.doi:10.1063/5.0028856. eprint:https://pubs. aip . org / aip / jmp / article - pdf / doi / 10 . 1063 / 5 . 0028856 / 16099609 / 022203 _ 1 _ online . pdf.url: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0028856

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0028856 2021

  60. [60]

    Random tensor models in the large N limit: Uncoloring the colored tensor models

    Valentin Bonzom, Razvan Gurau, and Vincent Rivasseau. “Random tensor models in the large N limit: Uncoloring the colored tensor models”. In:Phys. Rev. D85 (2012), p. 084037.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85. 084037. arXiv:1202.3637 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.85 2012

  61. [61]

    Invariants for multiple qubits: the case of 3 qubits

    David A Meyer and Noland Wallach. “Invariants for multiple qubits: the case of 3 qubits”. In:Mathematics of quantum computation. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2002, pp. 93–116

    2002

  62. [62]

    Springer, 2015

    Harm Derksen and Gregor Kemper.Computational invariant theory. Springer, 2015

    2015

  63. [63]

    Separability from Multipartite Measures

    Chen-Te Ma and Ma-Ke Yuan. “Separability from Multipartite Measures”. In: (May 2026). arXiv:2605. 02097 [quant-ph]

    2026

  64. [64]

    Gamma and factorial in the monthly

    Jonathan M Borwein and Robert M Corless. “Gamma and factorial in the monthly”. In:The American Mathematical Monthly125.5 (2018), pp. 400–424

    2018

  65. [65]

    Entanglement detection

    Otfried G¨ uhne and G´ eza T´ oth. “Entanglement detection”. In:Phys. Rept.474 (2009), pp. 1–75.doi:10. 1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004. arXiv:0811.2803 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  66. [66]

    Partial separability and entanglement criteria for multiqubit quantum states

    Michael Seevinck and Jos Uffink. “Partial separability and entanglement criteria for multiqubit quantum states”. In:Phys. Rev. A78 (2008), p. 032101.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.78.032101. arXiv:0710.5326 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.78.032101 2008

  67. [67]

    Multipartite entanglement measures

    Szil´ ard Szalay. “Multipartite entanglement measures”. In:Physical Review A92.4 (Oct. 2015).issn: 1094- 1622.doi:10.1103/physreva.92.042329.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.042329

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.042329.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.92.042329 2015

  68. [68]

    Partial separability revisited: Necessary and sufficient criteria

    Szil´ ard Szalay and Zolt´ an K¨ ok´ enyesi. “Partial separability revisited: Necessary and sufficient criteria”. In: Phys. Rev. A86 (2012), p. 032341.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.86.032341. arXiv:1206.6253 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.86.032341 2012

  69. [69]

    The classification of multipartite quantum correlation

    Szil´ ard Szalay. “The classification of multipartite quantum correlation”. In:J. Phys. A51 (2018), p. 485302. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aae971. arXiv:1806.04392 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aae971 2018

  70. [70]

    k-stretchability of entanglement, and the duality of k-separability and k-producibility

    Szil´ ard Szalay. “k-stretchability of entanglement, and the duality of k-separability and k-producibility”. In: Quantum3 (Dec. 2019), p. 204.issn: 2521-327X.doi:10 . 22331 / q - 2019 - 12 - 02 - 204.url:https : //doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-12-02-204

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2019-12-02-204 2019

  71. [71]

    Stretching the limits of multiparticle entanglement

    G´ eza T´ oth. “Stretching the limits of multiparticle entanglement”. In:Quantum Views4 (Jan. 2020), p. 30. doi:10.22331/qv-2020-01-27-30.url:https://doi.org/10.22331/qv-2020-01-27-30

    work page doi:10.22331/qv-2020-01-27-30.url:https://doi.org/10.22331/qv-2020-01-27-30 2020

  72. [72]

    Detectingk-nonstretchability via a class of informationally complete symmetric measure- ments

    Yan Hong et al. “Detectingk-nonstretchability via a class of informationally complete symmetric measure- ments”. In: (Aug. 2025). arXiv:2508.12817 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Genuine multientropy and holography

    Norihiro Iizuka and Mitsuhiro Nishida. “Genuine multientropy and holography”. In:Phys. Rev. D112.2 (2025), p. 026011.doi:10.1103/714c-byxq. arXiv:2502.07995 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/714c-byxq 2025

  74. [74]

    Universal tripartite entanglement in one-dimensional many-body systems

    Yijian Zou et al. “Universal tripartite entanglement in one-dimensional many-body systems”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.126.12 (2021), p. 120501.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.120501. arXiv:2011.11864 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.120501 2021

  75. [75]

    More on genuine multientropy and holography

    Norihiro Iizuka, Simon Lin, and Mitsuhiro Nishida. “More on genuine multientropy and holography”. In: Phys. Rev. D112.6 (2025), p. 066014.doi:10.1103/x76v-mr6n. arXiv:2504.16589 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/x76v-mr6n 2025

  76. [76]

    Understanding the interplay of entanglement and nonlocality: motivating and developing a new branch of entanglement theory

    David Schmid et al. “Understanding the interplay of entanglement and nonlocality: motivating and devel- oping a new branch of entanglement theory”. In:Quantum7 (2023), p. 1194.doi:10.22331/q-2023-12- 04-1194. arXiv:2004.09194 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.22331/q-2023-12- 2023

  77. [77]

    On the projective geometry of entanglement and contextuality

    Fr´ ed´ eric Holweck. “On the projective geometry of entanglement and contextuality”. Habilitation ` a diriger des recherches. Universit´ e Bourgogne Franche-Comt´ e, Sept. 2019.url:https://hal.science/tel-02913351. 107

    2019

  78. [78]

    Tensor models from the viewpoint of matrix models: the case of loop models on random surfaces

    Valentin Bonzom and Fr´ ed´ eric Combes. “Tensor models from the viewpoint of matrix models: the cases of loop models on random surfaces and of the Gaussian distribution”. In:Ann. Inst. H. Poincare D Comb. Phys. Interact.2.1 (2015), pp. 1–47.doi:10.4171/aihpd/14. arXiv:1304.4152 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4171/aihpd/14 2015

  79. [79]

    Enhancing non-melonic triangulations: A tensor model mixing melonic and planar maps

    Valentin Bonzom, Thibault Delepouve, and Vincent Rivasseau. “Enhancing non-melonic triangulations: A tensor model mixing melonic and planar maps”. In:Nuclear Physics B895 (2015), pp. 161–191.issn: 0550- 3213.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.04.004.url:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0550321315001273

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.04.004.url:https://www.sciencedirect 2015

  80. [81]

    The 1/N Expansion of Multi-Orientable Random Tensor Models

    St´ ephane Dartois, Vincent Rivasseau, and Adrian Tanasa. “The 1/N Expansion of Multi-Orientable Random Tensor Models”. In:Annales Henri Poincar´ e15.5 (May 2014), pp. 965–984.issn: 1424-0661.doi:10.1007/ s00023-013-0262-8.url:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-013-0262-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00023-013-0262-8 2014

Showing first 80 references.