arxiv: 2604.03296 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-28 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

Recognition: no theorem link

3D-IDE: 3D Implicit Depth Emergent

Chushan Zhang , Ruihan Lu , Jinguang Tong , Yikai Wang , Hongdong Li

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 22:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI

keywords implicit depth emergenceinformation bottleneck3D scene understandingmultimodal LLMsgeometric self-supervisionvisual representationsinference efficiency

0 comments

The pith

3D perception emerges implicitly in visual representations by using an information bottleneck from geometric self-supervision.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that 3D understanding can arise inside a multimodal model's visual features without explicit depth or pose inputs at runtime. It does so by training with an information bottleneck built from a fine-grained geometry validator and global representation constraints. This forces the features to capture 3D structure through self-supervision rather than external modules. If correct, models gain 3D scene awareness while running faster and without added dependencies. A reader would care because the approach removes the cost of grafting separate 3D components into language models for indoor tasks.

Core claim

By strategically leveraging privileged geometric supervision through mechanisms like a fine-grained geometry validator and global representation constraints, the Implicit Geometric Emergence Principle constructs an information bottleneck that forces the model to maximize the mutual information between visual features and 3D structures, allowing 3D awareness to emerge naturally within a unified visual representation and eliminating depth and pose dependencies during inference with zero latency overhead.

What carries the argument

The Implicit Geometric Emergence Principle, which builds an information bottleneck via fine-grained geometry validator and global representation constraints to force 3D structure into unified visual features.

Load-bearing premise

The auxiliary geometric objectives create a true information bottleneck that forces genuine 3D structure into the features rather than allowing shortcuts or memorization.

What would settle it

An experiment where removing the geometry validator and constraints causes no drop in 3D benchmark scores but keeps 2D performance unchanged would show the bottleneck is not required for the claimed emergence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03296 by Chushan Zhang, Hongdong Li, Jinguang Tong, Ruihan Lu, Yikai Wang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Comparison of 3D-aware designs for video-LLMs. (a) Explicit coordinate injection fuses 2D features with coarse 3D positional embeddings and requires 3D inputs at inference. (b) Dual encoders separately process RGB and geometry, then fuse their outputs, increasing complexity and latency. (c) 3D-IDE uses a single visual encoder trained so that 3D awareness emerges implicitly, enabling efficient RGB-only inf… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Illustration of the double information loss in explicit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The 3D-IDE framework. Our approach avoids the “Double Information Loss” (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Qualitative results on three 3D vision-language tasks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: More qualitative results on three 3D vision-language [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: 3D-IDE retains performance w/o global supervision, at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: More qualitative results on three 3D vision-language [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Leveraging 3D information within Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has recently shown significant advantages for indoor scene understanding. However, existing methods, including those using explicit ground-truth 3D positional encoding and those grafting external 3D foundation models for implicit geometry, struggle with the trade-off in 2D-3D representation fusion, leading to suboptimal deployment. To this end, we propose 3D-Implicit Depth Emergence, a method that reframes 3D perception as an emergent property derived from geometric self-supervision rather than explicit encoding. Our core insight is the Implicit Geometric Emergence Principle: by strategically leveraging privileged geometric supervision through mechanisms like a fine-grained geometry validator and global representation constraints, we construct an information bottleneck. This bottleneck forces the model to maximize the mutual information between visual features and 3D structures, allowing 3D awareness to emerge naturally within a unified visual representation. Unlike existing approaches, our method enables 3D perception to emerge implicitly, disentangling features in dense regions and, crucially, eliminating depth and pose dependencies during inference with zero latency overhead. This paradigm shift from external grafting to implicit emergence represents a fundamental rethinking of 3D knowledge integration in visual-language models. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method surpasses SOTA on multiple 3D scene understanding benchmarks. Our approach achieves a 55% reduction in inference latency while maintaining strong performance across diverse downstream tasks, underscoring the effectiveness of meticulously designed auxiliary objectives for dependency-free 3D understanding. Source code can be found at github.com/ChushanZhang/3D-IDE.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

3D-IDE is a training recipe that adds auxiliary geometry losses to push 3D structure into MLLM features without explicit depth or pose at inference, but the abstract gives no ablations or direct checks that the features actually carry metric 3D rather than 2D shortcuts.

read the letter

The core idea is straightforward: add a fine-grained geometry validator plus global constraints during training so that 3D awareness emerges in the visual features, letting the model drop depth and pose inputs at test time. That produces the claimed 55% latency drop while still beating prior numbers on indoor scene benchmarks. The paper ships code, which is useful for anyone who wants to try the recipe themselves. The combination of validator and global constraint is presented as the new piece, even if the broader notion of self-supervised geometric emergence has shown up before. What the work does cleanly is reframe the deployment problem as a training-time information bottleneck rather than an inference-time fusion headache. That framing is practical for robotics or AR settings where you want one unified representation. The soft spots sit in the experimental controls. The abstract reports SOTA results and the latency win but shows no quantitative ablation on the validator, no error bars, and no direct test that the features encode actual metric depth or pose rather than texture cues or training-set patterns. Without those checks the emergence claim risks being circular with the losses that were added to enforce it. The mutual-information argument is stated but not measured. For a reader working on efficient 3D-aware MLLMs this is worth a look once the full experiments are in hand, because the latency angle matters for real deployment. It is not yet a broad shift in how we think about 3D in vision-language models. I would send it to peer review if the full paper includes the missing ablations and some feature-level verification; otherwise it stays in the interesting-but-unproven category.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes 3D-IDE for MLLMs in indoor scene understanding. It reframes 3D perception as an emergent property via the Implicit Geometric Emergence Principle: a fine-grained geometry validator and global representation constraints create an information bottleneck that maximizes mutual information between visual features and 3D structures. This yields a unified representation enabling 3D awareness without explicit depth or pose inputs at inference (zero latency overhead), SOTA results on multiple 3D benchmarks, and a claimed 55% inference latency reduction.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would be significant for offering an implicit route to 3D integration in multimodal models that avoids external 3D foundation models or positional encodings while cutting inference cost. Public source code release aids reproducibility.

major comments (3)

Abstract: the reported 55% latency reduction and SOTA benchmark gains are stated without any quantitative ablation tables, error bars, or description of how the information bottleneck or latency is measured, leaving the contribution of the validator and constraints unisolated.
Implicit Geometric Emergence Principle (method description): the claim that auxiliary objectives force genuine 3D structure via mutual-information maximization is not supported by direct MI estimation, feature visualizations, or controls (e.g., OOD geometry tests) that would rule out 2D texture shortcuts or memorization.
Experimental section: no ablation isolating the fine-grained geometry validator from other losses is shown, so it remains unclear whether observed gains arise from the claimed bottleneck or from standard supervised training.

minor comments (1)

Notation for the global representation constraints should be formalized with explicit equations to clarify their interaction with the validator loss.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment point by point below. Where the manuscript requires additional evidence or clarification, we will revise accordingly in the next version to strengthen the presentation of our results and method.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: the reported 55% latency reduction and SOTA benchmark gains are stated without any quantitative ablation tables, error bars, or description of how the information bottleneck or latency is measured, leaving the contribution of the validator and constraints unisolated.

Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract summarizes the key outcomes without referencing the supporting quantitative details. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit references to the ablation tables (including error bars) that appear in the experimental section and include a brief description of the latency measurement protocol (wall-clock inference time on a single A100 GPU for end-to-end forward passes). We will also clarify how the information bottleneck is quantified via the auxiliary loss terms, thereby isolating the validator and constraint contributions. revision: yes
Referee: Implicit Geometric Emergence Principle (method description): the claim that auxiliary objectives force genuine 3D structure via mutual-information maximization is not supported by direct MI estimation, feature visualizations, or controls (e.g., OOD geometry tests) that would rule out 2D texture shortcuts or memorization.

Authors: The principle is grounded in the information-bottleneck construction and is indirectly validated by the downstream 3D benchmark gains. We agree that stronger mechanistic evidence would be valuable. In the revision we will add t-SNE and activation-map visualizations of the learned features and introduce OOD geometry perturbation tests. Direct mutual-information estimation on high-dimensional features is computationally prohibitive in our setting; we will instead report a variational lower-bound proxy to support the maximization claim. revision: partial
Referee: Experimental section: no ablation isolating the fine-grained geometry validator from other losses is shown, so it remains unclear whether observed gains arise from the claimed bottleneck or from standard supervised training.

Authors: We will insert a dedicated ablation study that incrementally disables the fine-grained geometry validator while retaining the remaining loss terms. The new table will report performance deltas on the primary benchmarks, thereby demonstrating that the observed improvements are attributable to the bottleneck mechanism rather than generic supervised training. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Implicit Geometric Emergence Principle is defined by the auxiliary objectives it claims to produce

specific steps

self definitional [Abstract]
"Our core insight is the Implicit Geometric Emergence Principle: by strategically leveraging privileged geometric supervision through mechanisms like a fine-grained geometry validator and global representation constraints, we construct an information bottleneck. This bottleneck forces the model to maximize the mutual information between visual features and 3D structures, allowing 3D awareness to emerge naturally within a unified visual representation."

The emergence of 3D awareness is presented as a consequence of the information bottleneck constructed via the fine-grained geometry validator and global representation constraints. These mechanisms are the training objectives introduced by the authors, making the claimed emergence equivalent to the application of the supervision by construction rather than an independent result.

full rationale

The paper's central claim reframes 3D perception as an emergent property from an information bottleneck created by the fine-grained geometry validator and global representation constraints. This is presented as the Implicit Geometric Emergence Principle, but the description shows the emergence is defined directly in terms of the privileged geometric supervision mechanisms the authors introduce. The result therefore reduces to the training setup by construction, with no independent derivation or verification (such as direct MI estimation) that the features encode metric 3D structure beyond the losses. This produces partial circularity consistent with the reader's score of 5, while the method still contains independent engineering contributions in the specific validator design.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The method rests on the unproven premise that the chosen auxiliary objectives create a genuine information bottleneck rather than allowing shortcut solutions. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

weights of auxiliary geometry losses
The fine-grained validator and global constraint objectives require weighting hyperparameters that are fitted or chosen to produce the reported emergence effect.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Mutual information between visual features and 3D structure can be maximized through the described validator and constraint without explicit 3D inputs at inference
Invoked in the definition of the Implicit Geometric Emergence Principle

invented entities (1)

Implicit Geometric Emergence Principle no independent evidence
purpose: Conceptual framing that 3D perception arises naturally from the information bottleneck
Newly named principle introduced to explain why the auxiliary objectives produce 3D awareness

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5598 in / 1483 out tokens · 32597 ms · 2026-05-14T22:30:51.281429+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

[1]

GPT-4 Technical Report

Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ah- mad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[2]

Scanqa: 3d question answering for spatial scene understanding

Daichi Azuma, Taiki Miyanishi, Shuhei Kurita, and Motoaki Kawanabe. Scanqa: 3d question answering for spatial scene understanding. InCVPR, 2022. License: Creative Com- mons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. 6, 7, 2, 5

work page 2022
[3]

3djcg: A unified framework for joint dense captioning and visual grounding on 3d point clouds

Daigang Cai, Lichen Zhao, Jing Zhang, Lu Sheng, and Dong Xu. 3djcg: A unified framework for joint dense captioning and visual grounding on 3d point clouds. InCVPR, 2022. 4, 5

work page 2022
[4]

Rgb-d datasets using microsoft kinect or similar sensors: a survey

Ziyun Cai, Jungong Han, Li Liu, and Ling Shao. Rgb-d datasets using microsoft kinect or similar sensors: a survey. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76(3):4313–4355, 2017. 1

work page 2017
[5]

Scanrefer: 3d object localization in rgb-d scans using natural language

Dave Zhenyu Chen, Angel X Chang, and Matthias Nießner. Scanrefer: 3d object localization in rgb-d scans using natural language. InEuropean conference on computer vision, 2020. License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. 6, 7, 2, 4

work page 2020
[6]

Dave Zhenyu Chen, Qirui Wu, Matthias Nießner, and An- gel X. Chang. D3net: A unified speaker-listener architecture for 3d dense captioning and visual grounding. InECCV,

work page
[7]

Vid-llm: A compact video-based 3d multimodal llm with reconstruction-reasoning synergy

Haijier Chen, Bo Xu, Shoujian Zhang, Haoze Liu, Jiaxuan Lin, and Jingrong Wang. Vid-llm: A compact video-based 3d multimodal llm with reconstruction-reasoning synergy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.24385, 2025. 1, 2, 7

work page arXiv 2025
[8]

Language conditioned spatial relation reasoning for 3d object grounding

Shizhe Chen, Pierre-Louis Guhur, Makarand Tapaswi, Cordelia Schmid, and Ivan Laptev. Language conditioned spatial relation reasoning for 3d object grounding. In NeurIPS, 2022. 7, 4

work page 2022
[9]

Ll3da: Visual interactive instruction tuning for omni-3d understanding reasoning and planning

Sijin Chen, Xin Chen, Chi Zhang, Mingsheng Li, Gang Yu, Hao Fei, Hongyuan Zhu, Jiayuan Fan, and Tao Chen. Ll3da: Visual interactive instruction tuning for omni-3d understanding reasoning and planning. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 26428–26438, 2024. 2

work page 2024
[10]

Ll3da: Visual interactive instruction tuning for omni-3d understanding reasoning and planning

Sijin Chen, Xin Chen, Chi Zhang, Mingsheng Li, Gang Yu, Hao Fei, Hongyuan Zhu, Jiayuan Fan, and Tao Chen. Ll3da: Visual interactive instruction tuning for omni-3d understanding reasoning and planning. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 26428–26438, 2024. 1, 7, 5

work page 2024
[11]

Grounded 3d-llm with referent tokens

Yilun Chen, Shuai Yang, Haifeng Huang, Tai Wang, Ruiyuan Lyu, Runsen Xu, Dahua Lin, and Jiangmiao Pang. Grounded 3d-llm with referent tokens. 2024. 7, 4, 5

work page 2024
[12]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10370 (2024)

Yilun Chen, Shuai Yang, Haifeng Huang, Tai Wang, Run- sen Xu, Ruiyuan Lyu, Dahua Lin, and Jiangmiao Pang. Grounded 3d-llm with referent tokens.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10370, 2024. 2

work page arXiv 2024
[13]

Scan2cap: Context-aware dense captioning in rgb-d scans

Zhenyu Chen, Ali Gholami, Matthias Nießner, and An- gel X Chang. Scan2cap: Context-aware dense captioning in rgb-d scans. InCVPR, 2021. License: Creative Com- mons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. 6, 7, 3

work page 2021
[14]

Scannet: Richly-annotated 3d reconstructions of indoor scenes

Angela Dai, Angel X Chang, Manolis Savva, Maciej Hal- ber, Thomas Funkhouser, and Matthias Nießner. Scannet: Richly-annotated 3d reconstructions of indoor scenes. In CVPR, 2017. License: ScanNet Terms of Use. 6

work page 2017
[15]

3d-llava: Towards generalist 3d lmms with omni superpoint transformer

Jiajun Deng, Tianyu He, Li Jiang, Tianyu Wang, Feras Day- oub, and Ian Reid. 3d-llava: Towards generalist 3d lmms with omni superpoint transformer. 2025. 7

work page 2025
[16]

Prob- ing the 3d awareness of visual foundation models

Mohamed El Banani, Amit Raj, Kevis-Kokitsi Maninis, Ab- hishek Kar, Yuanzhen Li, Michael Rubinstein, Deqing Sun, Leonidas Guibas, Justin Johnson, and Varun Jampani. Prob- ing the 3d awareness of visual foundation models. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 21795–21806, 2024. 2

work page 2024
[17]

Prob- ing the 3d awareness of visual foundation models

Mohamed El Banani, Amit Raj, Kevis-Kokitsi Maninis, Ab- hishek Kar, Yuanzhen Li, Michael Rubinstein, Deqing Sun, Leonidas Guibas, Justin Johnson, and Varun Jampani. Prob- ing the 3d awareness of visual foundation models. InCVPR,

work page
[18]

Scene-llm: Extending language model for 3d visual understanding and reasoning

Rao Fu, Jingyu Liu, Xilun Chen, Yixin Nie, and Wenhan Xiong. Scene-llm: Extending language model for 3d visual understanding and reasoning. 2024. 7, 3, 5

work page 2024
[19]

3d-llm: In- jecting the 3d world into large language models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:20482–20494,

Yining Hong, Haoyu Zhen, Peihao Chen, Shuhong Zheng, Yilun Du, Zhenfang Chen, and Chuang Gan. 3d-llm: In- jecting the 3d world into large language models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:20482–20494,

work page
[20]

3d-llm: Inject- ing the 3d world into large language models

Yining Hong, Haoyu Zhen, Peihao Chen, Shuhong Zheng, Yilun Du, Zhenfang Chen, and Chuang Gan. 3d-llm: Inject- ing the 3d world into large language models. InNeurIPS,

work page
[21]

Chat-3d v2: Bridging 3d scene and large language models with object identifiers

Haifeng Huang, Zehan Wang, Rongjie Huang, Luping Liu, Xize Cheng, Yang Zhao, Tao Jin, and Zhou Zhao. Chat-3d v2: Bridging 3d scene and large language models with object identifiers. 2023. 7, 3, 4, 5

work page 2023
[22]

An embodied generalist agent in 3d world

Jiangyong Huang, Silong Yong, Xiaojian Ma, Xiongkun Linghu, Puhao Li, Yan Wang, Qing Li, Song-Chun Zhu, Baoxiong Jia, and Siyuan Huang. An embodied generalist agent in 3d world. 2024. 7, 5

work page 2024
[23]

Multi- view transformer for 3d visual grounding

Shijia Huang, Yilun Chen, Jiaya Jia, and Liwei Wang. Multi- view transformer for 3d visual grounding. InCVPR, 2022. 7, 4

work page 2022
[24]

Mllms need 3d-aware representation supervision for scene under- standing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01946, 2025

Xiaohu Huang, Jingjing Wu, Qunyi Xie, and Kai Han. Mllms need 3d-aware representation supervision for scene under- standing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01946, 2025. 1, 2, 3, 7, 4, 5

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Navi: Category-agnostic image collections with high-quality 3d shape and pose annotations.Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems, 36:76061–76084, 2023

Varun Jampani, Kevis-Kokitsi Maninis, Andreas Engelhardt, Arjun Karpur, Karen Truong, Kyle Sargent, Stefan Popov, Andr´e Araujo, Ricardo Martin Brualla, Kaushal Patel, et al. Navi: Category-agnostic image collections with high-quality 3d shape and pose annotations.Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems, 36:76061–76084, 2023. 7

work page 2023
[26]

Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

Diederik P Kingma. Adam: A method for stochastic opti- mization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014. 7

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[27]

LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer

Bo Li, Yuanhan Zhang, Dong Guo, Renrui Zhang, Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Kaichen Zhang, Peiyuan Zhang, Yanwei Li, Zi- wei Liu, et al. Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03326, 2024. 2

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[28]

Dgns: Deformable gaussian splatting and dynamic neural surface for monocular dynamic 3d recon- struction

Xuesong Li, Jinguang Tong, Jie Hong, Vivien Rolland, and Lars Petersson. Dgns: Deformable gaussian splatting and dynamic neural surface for monocular dynamic 3d recon- struction. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, page 1812–1821, New York, NY , USA, 2025. Association for Computing Machinery. 1

work page 2025
[29]

Visual instruction tuning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:34892–34916, 2023

Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. Visual instruction tuning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:34892–34916, 2023. 1, 2

work page 2023
[30]

Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning

Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, and Yong Jae Lee. Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 26296–26306, 2024. 1

work page 2024
[31]

Oryx mllm: On-demand spatial-temporal understanding at arbitrary resolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12961, 2024

Zuyan Liu, Yuhao Dong, Ziwei Liu, Winston Hu, Ji- wen Lu, and Yongming Rao. Oryx mllm: On-demand spatial-temporal understanding at arbitrary resolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12961, 2024. 1

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

Oryx MLLM: on-demand spatial- temporal understanding at arbitrary resolution

Zuyan Liu, Yuhao Dong, Ziwei Liu, Winston Hu, Jiwen Lu, and Yongming Rao. Oryx MLLM: on-demand spatial- temporal understanding at arbitrary resolution. 2024. 5

work page 2024
[33]

SQA3D: situ- ated question answering in 3d scenes

Xiaojian Ma, Silong Yong, Zilong Zheng, Qing Li, Yitao Liang, Song-Chun Zhu, and Siyuan Huang. SQA3D: situ- ated question answering in 3d scenes. InICLR, 2023. Li- cense: CC-BY-4.0. 3

work page 2023
[34]

Lexicon3d: Probing visual foundation models for complex 3d scene understand- ing.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:76819–76847, 2024

Yunze Man, Shuhong Zheng, Zhipeng Bao, Martial Hebert, Liangyan Gui, and Yu-Xiong Wang. Lexicon3d: Probing visual foundation models for complex 3d scene understand- ing.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:76819–76847, 2024. 2

work page 2024
[35]

Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation

Charles R Qi, Hao Su, Kaichun Mo, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 652–660,

work page
[36]

Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

Charles Ruizhongtai Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. 2

work page 2017
[37]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01428 (2025)

Zhangyang Qi, Zhixiong Zhang, Ye Fang, Jiaqi Wang, and Hengshuang Zhao. Gpt4scene: Understand 3d scenes from videos with vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01428, 2025. 2

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

Gs-2dgs: Geometrically supervised 2dgs for reflective object reconstruction

Jinguang Tong, Xuesong Li, Fahira Afzal Maken, Sundaram Muthu, Lars Petersson, Chuong Nguyen, and Hongdong Li. Gs-2dgs: Geometrically supervised 2dgs for reflective object reconstruction. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 21547–21557, 2025. 2

work page 2025
[39]

SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Features

Michael Tschannen, Alexey Gritsenko, Xiao Wang, Muham- mad Ferjad Naeem, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Nikhil Parthasarathy, Talfan Evans, Lucas Beyer, Ye Xia, Basil Mustafa, et al. Siglip 2: Multilingual vision-language en- coders with improved semantic understanding, localization, and dense features.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14786, 2025. 5

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[40]

Vggt: Vi- sual geometry grounded transformer

Jianyuan Wang, Minghao Chen, Nikita Karaev, Andrea Vedaldi, Christian Rupprecht, and David Novotny. Vggt: Vi- sual geometry grounded transformer. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 5294–5306, 2025. 1, 2, 3, 6

work page 2025
[41]

Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution

Peng Wang, Shuai Bai, Sinan Tan, Shijie Wang, Zhihao Fan, Jinze Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, et al. Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision-language model’s perception of the world at any resolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12191, 2024. 2, 5

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[42]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08769 (2023)

Zehan Wang, Haifeng Huang, Yang Zhao, Ziang Zhang, and Zhou Zhao. Chat-3d: Data-efficiently tuning large language model for universal dialogue of 3d scenes.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08769, 2023. 2

work page arXiv 2023
[43]

Chat-3d: Data-efficiently tuning large language model for universal dialogue of 3d scenes

Zehan Wang, Haifeng Huang, Yang Zhao, Ziang Zhang, and Zhou Zhao. Chat-3d: Data-efficiently tuning large language model for universal dialogue of 3d scenes. 2023. 7, 5

work page 2023
[45]

Pointllm: Empowering large language models to understand point clouds

Runsen Xu, Xiaolong Wang, Tai Wang, Yilun Chen, Jiang- miao Pang, and Dahua Lin. Pointllm: Empowering large language models to understand point clouds. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 131–147. Springer,

work page
[46]

Inst3d-lmm: Instance-aware 3d scene under- standing with multi-modal instruction tuning

Hanxun Yu, Wentong Li, Song Wang, Junbo Chen, and Jianke Zhu. Inst3d-lmm: Instance-aware 3d scene under- standing with multi-modal instruction tuning. 2025. 7

work page 2025
[47]

Pmvc: Promoting multi-view consistency for 3d scene reconstruction

Chushan Zhang, Jinguang Tong, Tao Jun Lin, Chuong Nguyen, and Hongdong Li. Pmvc: Promoting multi-view consistency for 3d scene reconstruction. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Com- puter Vision (WACV), pages 3678–3688, 2024. 6

work page 2024
[48]

Flare: Feed-forward geometry, appearance and camera estimation from uncalibrated sparse views

Shangzhan Zhang, Jianyuan Wang, Yinghao Xu, Nan Xue, Christian Rupprecht, Xiaowei Zhou, Yujun Shen, and Gor- don Wetzstein. Flare: Feed-forward geometry, appearance and camera estimation from uncalibrated sparse views. 2025. 1, 2

work page 2025
[49]

Yiming Zhang, ZeMing Gong, and Angel X. Chang. Multi3drefer: Grounding text description to multiple 3d ob- jects. InICCV, 2023. License: MIT. 6, 7, 2, 4, 5

work page 2023
[50]

LLaVA-Video: Video Instruction Tuning With Synthetic Data

Yuanhan Zhang, Jinming Wu, Wei Li, Bo Li, Zejun Ma, Zi- wei Liu, and Chunyuan Li. Video instruction tuning with synthetic data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02713, 2024. 3, 5

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[51]

Video instruction tuning with synthetic data, 2024

Yuanhan Zhang, Jinming Wu, Wei Li, Bo Li, Zejun Ma, Zi- wei Liu, and Chunyuan Li. Video instruction tuning with synthetic data, 2024. 5

work page 2024
[52]

3dvg- transformer: Relation modeling for visual grounding on point clouds

Lichen Zhao, Daigang Cai, Lu Sheng, and Dong Xu. 3dvg- transformer: Relation modeling for visual grounding on point clouds. InICCV, 2021. 7, 4

work page 2021
[53]

Video-3d llm: Learning position-aware video representation for 3d scene understanding

Duo Zheng, Shijia Huang, and Liwei Wang. Video-3d llm: Learning position-aware video representation for 3d scene understanding. 2024. 7, 1, 3, 4, 5

work page 2024
[54]

Towards learning a generalist model for embodied navigation

Duo Zheng, Shijia Huang, Lin Zhao, Yiwu Zhong, and Liwei Wang. Towards learning a generalist model for embodied navigation. InCVPR, 2024. 5

work page 2024
[55]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24625 (2025)

Duo Zheng, Shijia Huang, Yanyang Li, and Liwei Wang. Learning from videos for 3d world: Enhancing mllms with 3d vision geometry priors.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24625,

work page arXiv
[56]

Video-3d llm: Learning position-aware video representation for 3d scene understanding

Duo Zheng, Shijia Huang, and Liwei Wang. Video-3d llm: Learning position-aware video representation for 3d scene understanding. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 8995–9006, 2025. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 4

work page 2025
[57]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18125 (2024)

Chenming Zhu, Tai Wang, Wenwei Zhang, Jiangmiao Pang, and Xihui Liu. Llava-3d: A simple yet effective pathway to empowering lmms with 3d-awareness.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18125, 2024. 1, 2

work page arXiv 2024
[58]

Llava-3d: A simple yet effective pathway to empowering lmms with 3d-awareness

Chenming Zhu, Tai Wang, Wenwei Zhang, Jiangmiao Pang, and Xihui Liu. Llava-3d: A simple yet effective pathway to empowering lmms with 3d-awareness. 2024. 7, 3, 4, 5

work page 2024
[59]

3d-vista: Pre-trained transformer for 3d vision and text alignment

Ziyu Zhu, Xiaojian Ma, Yixin Chen, Zhidong Deng, Siyuan Huang, and Qing Li. 3d-vista: Pre-trained transformer for 3d vision and text alignment. InICCV, 2023. 7, 3, 4, 5

work page 2023
[60]

Unifying 3d vision-language understanding via prompt- able queries

Ziyu Zhu, Zhuofan Zhang, Xiaojian Ma, Xuesong Niu, Yixin Chen, Baoxiong Jia, Zhidong Deng, Siyuan Huang, and Qing Li. Unifying 3d vision-language understanding via prompt- able queries. InECCV, 2024. 7, 4, 5 3D-IDE: 3D Implicit Depth Emergent Supplementary Material

work page 2024
[61]

Datasets Statistics Training data.For fine-tuning, we adopt the same pool of 3D Understanding and Reasoning benchmarks as Video-3D LLM [53], namely ScanRefer, Multi3DRefer, Scan2Cap, ScanQA, and SQA3D. In total, this yields223,128train- ing examples: SQA3D provides79,445samples (35.6% of the corpus), Multi3DRefer43,838(19.6%), ScanRefer and Scan2Cap36,665...

work page
[62]

free-lunch

Additional Ablative Analysis Geometric Representation.As shown in Tabs. 11 and 12, both the pretrained-head and from-scratch-head variants improve encoder probing scores compared to training with- out any validator, confirming that geometric supervision is beneficial. Among them, the from-scratch validator yields the highest normal and correspondence accu...

work page
[63]

Extended Ablation Across All Benchmarks.To further validate the contribution of each component, Tab

Detailed Comparison Here, we conduct a thorough comparison with other meth- ods, covering all metrics across five benchmark tasks. Extended Ablation Across All Benchmarks.To further validate the contribution of each component, Tab. 7 extends the ablation in the main paper to all five benchmarks by cu- mulatively adding each objective. Each component bring...

work page
[64]

Unique” and “Multiple

More Qualitative Results Figs. 5 and 7 qualitatively summarize the behavior of our model on three challenging 3D scene understanding tasks: language-guided object localization, region-level caption- ing, and spatial question answering. In the visual ground- ing examples, the model must retrieve the correct object in a cluttered 3D environment given a natu...

work page arXiv