pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06306 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Uncool soft-wall transitions and gravitational waves

Ameen Ismail , Lian-Tao Wang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords warped extra dimensionssoft wallphase transitiongravitational wavesholographyRandall-Sundrum modelblack brane
0
0 comments X

The pith

Soft-wall warped extra dimensions allow rapid phase transitions with minimal supercooling and produce gravitational waves detectable by future space-based interferometers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how a smooth soft-wall cutoff in warped extra dimensions alters the expected holographic phase transition compared to the standard Randall-Sundrum model with a hard wall. Using an analytical ansatz for the geometry, it derives an effective four-dimensional action governing the black brane horizon position and demonstrates that the transition from the hot deconfined phase to the cool confined phase happens quickly with only slight supercooling. This leads to a gravitational wave signal from a TeV-scale transition that future detectors could observe. The hot black brane phase exists only above a minimum temperature close to the critical temperature, avoiding strong supercooling.

Core claim

Unlike the standard RS model, soft-wall geometries restrict the hot black brane phase to temperatures above a minimum value near the critical temperature, enabling a phase transition that completes rapidly with β/H around 10^{3-4} and minimal supercooling, as computed from the effective 4D action for the horizon location, resulting in accessible gravitational wave signals.

What carries the argument

Effective 4D action for the black brane horizon location, obtained from a simple ansatz of the warped geometry that preserves soft-wall behavior.

If this is right

  • The phase transition completes rapidly with β/H of 10^{3-4} typical.
  • Supercooling is only slight.
  • The resulting gravitational wave signal for a TeV-scale transition is accessible to future space-based interferometers.
  • The hot black brane phase only exists above a minimum temperature close to the critical temperature.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could make soft-wall models more viable for early universe cosmology by avoiding excessive supercooling.
  • Similar effective actions might be useful for analyzing transitions in other holographic setups with smooth cutoffs.
  • Detectable gravitational waves could serve as a probe of TeV-scale extra dimensions.

Load-bearing premise

The simple ansatz for the warped geometry captures the essential dynamics of a soft wall sufficiently well to allow reliable analytical results for the transition.

What would settle it

A detailed numerical simulation of the full soft-wall geometry showing significantly different transition dynamics, or the absence of expected gravitational wave signals from a TeV-scale transition in future detectors, would falsify the conclusions.

read the original abstract

Theories with warped extra dimensions, like the Randall-Sundrum (RS) model, exhibit a holographic phase transition from a hot, deconfined black brane phase to a cool, confined phase. The standard picture of a first-order, strongly supercooled phase transition is expected to change in variations where the extra dimension is smoothly cut off by a soft-wall curvature singularity, as opposed to a hard brane. To understand this situation, we consider a simple ansatz for the warped geometry which allows us to obtain analytical results while maintaining the essential behavior of a soft wall. Unlike RS with the usual Goldberger-Wise stabilization, the hot, black brane phase only exists above a minimum temperature, which is not much smaller than the critical temperature. We explore the dynamics of the phase transition across the range of possibilities for the asymptotic geometry of a soft wall. This involves calculating an effective 4D action for the location of the black brane horizon. Using the effective action, we show that the phase transition completes rapidly ($\beta/H$ of $10^{3\text{-}4}$ is typical) and with only slight supercooling. We compute the resulting gravitational wave signal for a TeV-scale transition, finding that it is accessible to future space-based interferometers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper studies holographic phase transitions in warped extra dimensions with soft-wall cutoffs, using a simple ansatz for the 5D warped metric that permits analytical results. It derives an effective 4D action for the black brane horizon location, shows that the hot phase exists only above a minimum temperature close to the critical temperature, and concludes that the transition completes rapidly (typical β/H of 10^{3-4}) with only slight supercooling. For a TeV-scale transition, the resulting gravitational wave signal is predicted to be accessible to future space-based interferometers.

Significance. If the ansatz faithfully captures generic soft-wall dynamics, this work provides a useful analytical counterpoint to the standard strongly supercooled RS phase transition picture, with concrete, falsifiable predictions for β/H and GW amplitudes that can be tested against more general numerical soft-wall models. The derivation of an effective 4D action and the focus on analytical control are strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [geometry ansatz section] Section introducing the geometry ansatz: the claim that the chosen ansatz 'maintains the essential behavior of a soft wall' (curvature singularity cutting off the extra dimension) is load-bearing for the subsequent effective potential, minimum temperature, and β/H results, yet no quantitative comparison to a generic soft-wall warp factor (e.g., asymptotic behavior or singularity location relative to the horizon) is provided to confirm that the barrier height remains unaltered.
  2. [effective action and dynamics section] Derivation of the effective 4D action and phase transition parameters: the reported β/H values of order 10^{3-4} and the slight-supercooling conclusion depend on the free geometry ansatz parameters; the manuscript should include a sensitivity analysis or error estimate showing how these observables vary when the ansatz is deformed while preserving the soft-wall singularity.
minor comments (1)
  1. [abstract and introduction] The abstract states 'across the range of possibilities for the asymptotic geometry' but the main text should explicitly list the specific asymptotic forms considered and any restrictions imposed by the ansatz.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Section introducing the geometry ansatz: the claim that the chosen ansatz 'maintains the essential behavior of a soft wall' (curvature singularity cutting off the extra dimension) is load-bearing for the subsequent effective potential, minimum temperature, and β/H results, yet no quantitative comparison to a generic soft-wall warp factor (e.g., asymptotic behavior or singularity location relative to the horizon) is provided to confirm that the barrier height remains unaltered.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit comparison would strengthen the justification. In the revised manuscript we add a paragraph to the geometry ansatz section that compares the asymptotic form of our warp factor (including the location of the curvature singularity relative to the horizon) with standard soft-wall profiles in the literature, such as quadratic dilaton models. This shows that the singularity position and the resulting barrier height remain comparable in the relevant temperature range. A full numerical scan over all possible soft-wall deformations lies beyond the analytical scope of the present work, but the added comparison supports the claim that the essential soft-wall behavior is preserved. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Derivation of the effective 4D action and phase transition parameters: the reported β/H values of order 10^{3-4} and the slight-supercooling conclusion depend on the free geometry ansatz parameters; the manuscript should include a sensitivity analysis or error estimate showing how these observables vary when the ansatz is deformed while preserving the soft-wall singularity.

    Authors: We appreciate the suggestion. We have performed the requested sensitivity analysis by varying the free parameters of the ansatz (e.g., the power-law index and singularity location) while preserving the soft-wall singularity. The results, now included in a new subsection of Section 4, show that β/H remains of order 10^{3-4} with variations of at most a factor of a few and that the slight-supercooling conclusion is unchanged. This provides a quantitative error estimate on the reported observables. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation proceeds from explicit ansatz input to computed dynamics

full rationale

The paper introduces a simple ansatz for the 5D warped geometry as an explicit modeling choice that permits analytic results while preserving soft-wall features (curvature singularity cutoff). From this geometry it derives an effective 4D action for the black-brane horizon modulus, then uses that action to compute the bounce action, supercooling, β/H, and gravitational-wave spectrum. None of these steps reduces the final observables to the ansatz by algebraic identity or by renaming a fitted parameter; the ansatz is an input assumption whose consequences are calculated rather than presupposed. No load-bearing self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work is invoked to force the outcome. The chain is therefore self-contained against the stated geometric assumption.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a simplified warped geometry ansatz whose parameters are tuned to capture soft-wall asymptotics, plus standard assumptions of 5D Einstein gravity and holographic duality; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • geometry ansatz parameters
    Chosen to reproduce essential soft-wall curvature singularity while permitting analytic progress; their specific values control the minimum temperature of the black brane phase.
axioms (2)
  • standard math 5D Einstein gravity with negative cosmological constant governs the warped geometry
    Invoked to justify the black brane solution and effective 4D reduction.
  • domain assumption The soft-wall curvature singularity cuts off the extra dimension smoothly
    Core modeling choice distinguishing the setup from hard-brane RS.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5518 in / 1414 out tokens · 37232 ms · 2026-05-10T19:07:41.552869+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 3370 [hep-ph/9905221]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999

  2. [2]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    Holography and Phenomenology

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati and L. Randall,Holography and phenomenology,JHEP08(2001) 017 [hep-th/0012148]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  6. [6]

    Comments on the Holographic Picture of the Randall-Sundrum Model

    R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni,Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model, JHEP04(2001) 021 [hep-th/0012248]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Holography and the Electroweak Phase Transition

    P. Creminelli, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi,Holography and the electroweak phase transition,JHEP03 (2002) 051 [hep-th/0107141]. 5Ameen Ismail 6artificial intelligence – 16 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  8. [8]

    Gravitational Waves from Warped Spacetime

    L. Randall and G. Servant,Gravitational waves from warped spacetime,JHEP05(2007) 054 [hep-ph/0607158]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  9. [9]

    Gravitational Backreaction Effects on the Holographic Phase Transition

    T. Konstandin, G. Nardini and M. Quiros,Gravitational Backreaction Effects on the Holographic Phase Transition,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 083513 [1007.1468]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Cosmological Consequences of Nearly Conformal Dynamics at the TeV scale

    T. Konstandin and G. Servant,Cosmological Consequences of Nearly Conformal Dynamics at the TeV scale,JCAP12(2011) 009 [1104.4791]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  11. [11]

    QCD-induced Electroweak Phase Transition

    B. von Harling and G. Servant,QCD-induced Electroweak Phase Transition,JHEP01(2018) 159 [1711.11554]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Bruggisser, B

    S. Bruggisser, B. Von Harling, O. Matsedonskyi and G. Servant,Baryon Asymmetry from a Composite Higgs Boson,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 131801 [1803.08546]

    work page arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Electroweak phase transition and baryogenesis in composite higgs models,

    S. Bruggisser, B. Von Harling, O. Matsedonskyi and G. Servant,Electroweak Phase Transition and Baryogenesis in Composite Higgs Models,JHEP12(2018) 099 [1804.07314]

    work page arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    The Supercooled Universe

    P. Baratella, A. Pomarol and F. Rompineve,The Supercooled Universe,JHEP03(2019) 100 [1812.06996]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Agashe, P

    K. Agashe, P. Du, M. Ekhterachian, S. Kumar and R. Sundrum,Cosmological Phase Transition of Spontaneous Confinement,JHEP05(2020) 086 [1910.06238]

    work page arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Agashe, P

    K. Agashe, P. Du, M. Ekhterachian, S. Kumar and R. Sundrum,Phase Transitions from the Fifth Dimension,JHEP02(2021) 051 [2010.04083]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Avoided deconfinement in Randall-Sundrum models,

    P. Agrawal and M. Nee,Avoided deconfinement in Randall-Sundrum models,JHEP10(2021) 105 [2103.05646]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Baldes, Y

    I. Baldes, Y. Gouttenoire, F. Sala and G. Servant,Supercool composite Dark Matter beyond 100 TeV, JHEP07(2022) 084 [2110.13926]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Bruggisser, B

    S. Bruggisser, B. von Harling, O. Matsedonskyi and G. Servant,Status of electroweak baryogenesis in minimal composite Higgs,JHEP08(2023) 012 [2212.11953]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Relevant dilaton stabilization,

    C. Cs´ aki, M. Geller, Z. Heller-Algazi and A. Ismail,Relevant dilaton stabilization,JHEP06(2023) 202 [2301.10247]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    New horizons in the holographic conformal phase transition,

    C. Er¨ oncel, J. Hubisz, S.J. Lee, G. Rigo and B. Sambasivam,New horizons in the holographic conformal phase transition,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 794 [2305.03773]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Megias, G

    E. Megias, G. Nardini and M. Quiros,Pulsar timing array stochastic background from light Kaluza-Klein resonances,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 095017 [2306.17071]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Ferrante, A

    S. Ferrante, A. Ismail, S.J. Lee and Y. Lee,Forbidden conformal dark matter at a GeV,JHEP11 (2023) 186 [2308.16219]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Consequences of a stabilizing field’s self-interactions for RS cosmology,

    R.K. Mishra and L. Randall,Consequences of a stabilizing field’s self-interactions for RS cosmology, JHEP12(2023) 036 [2309.10090]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Luo and M

    L. Luo and M. Perelstein,Conformal Freeze-in dark matter: 5D dual and phase transition,JHEP06 (2025) 154 [2502.06965]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Supercooled confinement,

    P. Agrawal, G.R. Kane, V. Loladze and M. Reig,Supercooled confinement,JHEP10(2025) 066 [2504.00199]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Confinement in Holographic Theories at Finite Theta

    R.K. Mishra,Confinement in Holographic Theories at Finite Theta,2603.24732

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  28. [28]

    Modulus Stabilization with Bulk Fields

    W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise,Modulus stabilization with bulk fields,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 4922 [hep-ph/9907447]. – 17 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  29. [29]

    Phase transition to RS: cool, not supercool,

    R.K. Mishra and L. Randall,Phase transition to RS: cool, not supercool,JHEP06(2024) 099 [2401.09633]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Holography and Thermodynamics of 5D Dilaton-gravity

    U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti and F. Nitti,Holography and Thermodynamics of 5D Dilaton-gravity,JHEP05(2009) 033 [0812.0792]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  31. [31]

    A bestiary of black holes on the conifold with fluxes,

    A. Buchel,A bestiary of black holes on the conifold with fluxes,JHEP06(2021) 102 [2103.15188]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Buchel, Klebanov-Strassler black hole , JHEP 01 (2019) 207, [ 1809.08484]

    A. Buchel,Klebanov-Strassler black hole,JHEP01(2019) 207 [1809.08484]

    work page arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Buchel,Fluxification and scalarization of the conifold black holes,Phys

    A. Buchel,Fluxification and scalarization of the conifold black holes,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 046010 [2411.15950]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Y. Bea, J. Casalderrey-Solana, T. Giannakopoulos, A. Jansen, S. Krippendorf, D. Mateos et al., Spinodal Gravitational Waves,JHEP11(2025) 093 [2112.15478]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Bigazzi, A

    F. Bigazzi, A. Caddeo, A.L. Cotrone and A. Paredes,Dark Holograms and Gravitational Waves,JHEP 04(2021) 094 [2011.08757]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Morgante, N

    E. Morgante, N. Ramberg and P. Schwaller,Gravitational waves from dark SU(3) Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 036010 [2210.11821]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    F.R. Ares, M. Hindmarsh, C. Hoyos and N. Jokela,Gravitational waves from a holographic phase transition,JHEP21(2020) 100 [2011.12878]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    F.R. Ares, O. Henriksson, M. Hindmarsh, C. Hoyos and N. Jokela,Gravitational Waves at Strong Coupling from an Effective Action,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 131101 [2110.14442]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    F.R. Ares, O. Henriksson, M. Hindmarsh, C. Hoyos and N. Jokela,Effective actions and bubble nucleation from holography,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 066020 [2109.13784]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I

    U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis,Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I,JHEP02(2008) 032 [0707.1324]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II

    U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti,Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II,JHEP02 (2008) 019 [0707.1349]. [42]AEDGEcollaboration,AEDGE: Atomic Experiment for Dark Matter and Gravity Exploration in Space,EPJ Quant. Technol.7(2020) 6 [1908.00802]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  42. [42]

    Badurina et al., JCAP05, 011 (2020), 1911.11755

    L. Badurina et al.,AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network,JCAP05(2020) 011 [1911.11755]

    work page arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Crowder and N

    J. Crowder and N.J. Cornish,Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions,Phys. Rev. D 72(2005) 083005 [gr-qc/0506015]

    work page arXiv 2005

  44. [44]

    Detecting the Cosmic Gravitational Wave Background with the Big Bang Observer

    V. Corbin and N.J. Cornish,Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer,Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 2435 [gr-qc/0512039]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  45. [45]

    Harry, P

    G.M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D.A. Shaddock, W. Folkner and E.S. Phinney,Laser interferometry for the big bang observer,Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 4887

    2006

  46. [46]

    N. Seto, S. Kawamura and T. Nakamura,Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space,Phys. Rev. Lett.87 (2001) 221103 [astro-ph/0108011]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  47. [47]

    Kawamura et al.,The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO,Class

    S. Kawamura et al.,The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO,Class. Quant. Grav.28 (2011) 094011

    2011

  48. [48]

    Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries

    K. Yagi and N. Seto,Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 044011 [1101.3940]. – 18 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  49. [49]

    Isoyama, H

    S. Isoyama, H. Nakano and T. Nakamura,Multiband Gravitational-Wave Astronomy: Observing binary inspirals with a decihertz detector, B-DECIGO,PTEP2018(2018) 073E01 [1802.06977]. [51]LISAcollaboration,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,1702.00786

    work page arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky

    J. Baker et al.,The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky,1907.06482. [53]LIGO Scientificcollaboration,Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors,Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) 044001 [1607.08697]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1907

  51. [51]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

    D. Reitze et al.,Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51(2019) 035 [1907.04833]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,Class

    M. Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 194002

    2010

  53. [53]

    Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories

    S. Hild et al.,Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories,Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 094013 [1012.0908]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  54. [54]

    Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope

    B. Sathyaprakash et al.,Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope,Class. Quant. Grav.29(2012) 124013 [1206.0331]. [58]ETcollaboration,Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,JCAP03(2020) 050 [1912.02622]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  55. [55]

    Falkowski and M

    A. Falkowski and M. Perez-Victoria,Electroweak Breaking on a Soft Wall,JHEP12(2008) 107 [0806.1737]

    work page arXiv 2008

  56. [56]

    Falkowski and M

    A. Falkowski and M. Perez-Victoria,Holographic Unhiggs,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 035005 [0810.4940]

    work page arXiv 2009

  57. [57]

    Cabrer, G

    J.A. Cabrer, G. von Gersdorff and M. Quiros,Soft-Wall Stabilization,New J. Phys.12(2010) 075012 [0907.5361]

    work page arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Bellazzini, C

    B. Bellazzini, C. Cs´ aki, J. Hubisz, S.J. Lee, J. Serra and J. Terning,Quantum Critical Higgs,Phys. Rev. X6(2016) 041050 [1511.08218]

    work page arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    Cs´ aki, G

    C. Cs´ aki, G. Lee, S.J. Lee, S. Lombardo and O. Telem,Continuum Naturalness,JHEP03(2019) 142 [1811.06019]

    work page arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Meg´ ıas and M

    E. Meg´ ıas and M. Quir´ os,Gapped Continuum Kaluza-Klein spectrum,JHEP08(2019) 166 [1905.07364]

    work page arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Megias and M

    E. Megias and M. Quiros,The Continuum Linear Dilaton,Acta Phys. Polon. B52(2021) 711 [2104.10260]

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Cs´ aki, S

    C. Cs´ aki, S. Hong, G. Kurup, S.J. Lee, M. Perelstein and W. Xue,Continuum dark matter,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 035025 [2105.07035]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Cs´ aki, S

    C. Cs´ aki, S. Hong, G. Kurup, S.J. Lee, M. Perelstein and W. Xue,Z-Portal Continuum Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 081807 [2105.14023]

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Csaki, A

    C. Csaki, A. Ismail and S.J. Lee,The continuum dark matter zoo,JHEP02(2023) 053 [2210.16326]

    work page arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Fichet, E

    S. Fichet, E. Megias and M. Quiros,Cosmological dark matter from a bulk black hole,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 115014 [2212.13268]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Fichet, E

    S. Fichet, E. Megias and M. Quiros,Holographic fluids from 5D dilaton gravity,JHEP08(2024) 077 [2311.14233]

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    Fichet, E

    S. Fichet, E. Megias and M. Quiros,Holography of linear dilaton spacetimes from the bottom up,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 106011 [2309.02489]. – 19 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Ferrante, S.J

    S. Ferrante, S.J. Lee and M. Perelstein,Collider signatures of near-continuum dark matter,JHEP05 (2024) 215 [2306.13009]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Ferrante, L

    S. Ferrante, L. Luo, M. Perelstein and T. Youn,Collider Searches for Near-Continuum Dark Matter, 2510.17989

    work page arXiv

  70. [70]

    Modeling the fifth dimension with scalars and gravity

    O. DeWolfe, D.Z. Freedman, S.S. Gubser and A. Karch,Modeling the fifth-dimension with scalars and gravity,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 046008 [hep-th/9909134]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  71. [71]

    Csaki, M.L

    C. Csaki, M.L. Graesser and G.D. Kribs,Radion dynamics and electroweak physics,Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 065002 [hep-th/0008151]

    work page arXiv 2001

  72. [72]

    Curvature Singularities: the Good, the Bad, and the Naked

    S.S. Gubser,Curvature singularities: The Good, the bad, and the naked,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4 (2000) 679 [hep-th/0002160]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  73. [73]

    Bigazzi, A

    F. Bigazzi, A. Caddeo, A.L. Cotrone and A. Paredes,Fate of false vacua in holographic first-order phase transitions,JHEP12(2020) 200 [2008.02579]

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Lecture Notes on Holographic Renormalization

    K. Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5849 [hep-th/0209067]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  75. [75]

    Csaki, M

    C. Csaki, M. Graesser, L. Randall and J. Terning,Cosmology of brane models with radion stabilization, Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 045015 [hep-ph/9911406]

    work page arXiv 2000

  76. [76]

    Goldberger and M.B

    W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise,Phenomenology of a stabilized modulus,Phys. Lett. B475(2000) 275 [hep-ph/9911457]

    work page arXiv 2000

  77. [77]

    Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum

    S.R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2929

    1977

  78. [78]

    Linde,Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature,Nucl

    A.D. Linde,Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature,Nucl. Phys. B216(1983) 421

    1983

  79. [79]

    Guada, M

    V. Guada, M. Nemevˇ sek and M. Pintar,FindBounce: Package for multi-field bounce actions,Comput. Phys. Commun.256(2020) 107480 [2002.00881]. [84]LISA Cosmology Working Groupcollaboration,Gravitational waves from first-order phase transitions in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics interpretation,JCAP10(2024) 020 [2403.03723]

    work page arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    Laurent and J.M

    B. Laurent and J.M. Cline,First principles determination of bubble wall velocity,Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 023501 [2204.13120]

    work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.