pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15494 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-15 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-ex· nucl-th

Forward hadron production in pp collisions at LHC energies from an event generator based on the color glass condensate framework

Hirotsugu Fujii , Tetsufumi Hirano , Kazunori Itakura , Yasushi Nara , Shujun Zhao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 16:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-exnucl-th
keywords color glass condensatercBK evolutionMcLerran-Venugopalan modelforward hadron productionLHCb datakT factorizationMonte Carlo event generatorproton-proton collisions
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

LHCb data favor HERA-constrained McLerran-Venugopalan variants over the original model for forward hadron production at LHC energies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a Monte Carlo event generator called MC-CGC based on the color glass condensate to compute inclusive forward single-hadron production in proton-proton collisions at LHC energies. It performs a systematic comparison of three initial condition parameterizations for the running-coupling Balitsky-Kovchegov evolution equation: the original McLerran-Venugopalan model and two variants constrained by HERA deep inelastic scattering data. The calculations show that the current LHCb experimental data are better described by the constrained MV^γ and MV^e models. Differences between the models grow larger at higher transverse momenta and when moving from forward to mid-rapidity. The study also demonstrates that using k_T factorization yields better agreement with data at mid-rapidity compared to the dilute-dense DHJ factorization approach.

Core claim

Using the MC-CGC event generator, we investigate inclusive forward single-hadron production in high-energy proton-proton collisions within the CGC framework. By comparing three initial conditions for rcBK evolution—the MV model and its MV^γ and MV^e variants—we find that LHCb data favor the MV^γ and MV^e models. The differences from the original MV model are more pronounced at higher transverse momentum and at mid-rapidity. We also show that the k_T factorization framework provides a better description of particle production spectra at mid-rapidity than the DHJ framework, and we present predictions for upcoming ALICE FoCal measurements.

What carries the argument

The MC-CGC Monte Carlo event generator implementing rcBK evolution with MV, MV^γ, and MV^e initial conditions while comparing dilute-dense DHJ and dense-dense k_T factorization schemes.

If this is right

  • The MV^γ and MV^e models should be used for future CGC-based calculations of forward production at LHC energies.
  • Model differences increase at higher transverse momenta, making them more testable in that kinematic region.
  • k_T factorization is required for reliable descriptions of mid-rapidity spectra where both protons are dense.
  • Predictions for identified neutral mesons and jets in the ALICE FoCal detector follow directly from the preferred models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These tuned models could be applied to improve CGC predictions for proton-nucleus collisions or other processes involving dense gluon fields.
  • Extending the framework to include next-to-leading order corrections might test whether the current data preference survives.
  • Comparing the models against measurements from different rapidity ranges or collision energies would provide further validation.

Load-bearing premise

The Monte Carlo implementation of rcBK evolution with the chosen initial conditions and selected factorization schemes fully captures the dominant physics of forward hadron production without large contributions from higher-order corrections or non-CGC mechanisms.

What would settle it

New LHCb or ALICE data on forward hadron spectra at higher transverse momentum or mid-rapidity showing significantly better agreement with the original MV model than with the MV^γ or MV^e variants would challenge the reported preference.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15494 by Hirotsugu Fujii, Kazunori Itakura, Shujun Zhao, Tetsufumi Hirano, Yasushi Nara.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Workflow of the MC-CGC model [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: , which shows the Bjorken-𝑥 ranges accessed in the pp collisions at 13 TeV. The system can be divided into distinct rapidity regions, each characterized by different dynamics. At central and mid-rapidity (𝑦 < 2) at the LHC energies, both projectile and target partons reside in the small-𝑥 regime, corresponding to a dense–dense scattering environment. In this region, the predictions of the DHJ formula — whi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Dipole amplitude from three initial conditions used in this paper: MV model (green), MV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: d [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Charged particle multiplicity distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Comparison between the DHJ and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Neutral pion multiplicity distribution (left) and neutral particle ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Neutral pion mean transverse momentum (left) and neutral particle ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: d [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: jet d [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate inclusive forward single-hadron production in high-energy proton--proton collisions using a CGC-inspired Monte Carlo event generator, MC-CGC. We carried out a systematic study of the sensitivity of the running-coupling Balitsky-Kovchegov (rcBK) evolution equation to its initial conditions by comparing three parameterizations: the McLerran-Venugopalan (MV) model and its two HERA DIS-constrained variants, MV$^\gamma$ and MV$^e$. Our results indicate that the current LHCb data favor the MV$^\gamma$ and MV$^e$ models, while the differences from the original MV model become more pronounced at higher transverse momentum and at mid-rapidity. As a complementary analysis, we also compared the dilute-dense (DHJ factorization) and dense-dense ($k_T$ factorization) frameworks. We found that the $k_T$ factorization framework provides a better description of the particle production spectra at mid-rapidity than the DHJ framework, where both the projectile and target are in the dense regime at LHC energies. Predictions for the FoCal measurements at ALICE, including the production of identified neutral mesons and jets, are also presented.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the MC-CGC Monte Carlo event generator based on the color glass condensate framework to study inclusive forward single-hadron production in pp collisions at LHC energies. It performs a systematic comparison of three initial conditions for the rcBK evolution equation (MV, MV^γ, MV^e), concluding that LHCb data favor the HERA-constrained MV^γ and MV^e models, with differences more evident at higher p_T and mid-rapidity. The study also contrasts the DHJ (dilute-dense) and k_T (dense-dense) factorization schemes, finding k_T factorization superior for describing particle production at mid-rapidity. Predictions for identified neutral mesons and jets in the ALICE FoCal experiment are provided.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, this work supplies useful constraints on CGC initial conditions from LHCb forward data and clarifies the relative performance of factorization schemes in the dense-dense regime at mid-rapidity. The event-generator implementation enables direct, kinematics-aware comparisons with experiment, and the FoCal predictions will be directly relevant to upcoming ALICE measurements. The systematic exploration of MV variants constrained by HERA data is a clear strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5] §5: The central claim that LHCb data favor MV^γ and MV^e rests on direct spectral comparisons; the manuscript should explicitly document the precise kinematic cuts, normalization procedure, and Monte Carlo statistics per bin so that the stated preference can be independently reproduced and tested for sensitivity to these choices.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2: The comparison between k_T and DHJ factorization at mid-rapidity is load-bearing for the second main conclusion, yet the text does not quantify the size of possible higher-order or non-CGC contributions that could alter the relative description quality; a brief estimate or reference to existing NLO studies would strengthen the claim.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and §1: The phrasing 'We found that the k_T factorization framework provides a better description' should be softened to 'our numerical results indicate' to reflect the model-dependent nature of the comparison.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: Several figures lack explicit statements of the rapidity and p_T ranges used; adding these would improve readability.
  3. [References] References: The list is generally complete, but recent LHCb publications on forward hadron production (post-2020) should be checked for inclusion to update the experimental context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the recommendation of minor revision. We address the two major comments point by point below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§5] §5: The central claim that LHCb data favor MV^γ and MV^e rests on direct spectral comparisons; the manuscript should explicitly document the precise kinematic cuts, normalization procedure, and Monte Carlo statistics per bin so that the stated preference can be independently reproduced and tested for sensitivity to these choices.

    Authors: We agree that additional documentation will improve reproducibility. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in Section 5 (and, if space permits, a short appendix) that specifies: (i) the exact kinematic cuts applied to the LHCb forward-hadron data sets, (ii) the normalization procedure (including whether spectra are presented as differential cross sections or normalized to a reference bin), and (iii) the Monte Carlo event statistics accumulated per p_T bin for each initial-condition variant. These details will allow independent verification of the preference for the MV^γ and MV^e models and an assessment of statistical sensitivity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2: The comparison between k_T and DHJ factorization at mid-rapidity is load-bearing for the second main conclusion, yet the text does not quantify the size of possible higher-order or non-CGC contributions that could alter the relative description quality; a brief estimate or reference to existing NLO studies would strengthen the claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of placing the leading-order comparison in a broader context. In the revised Section 4.2 we will insert a short paragraph that references existing NLO calculations within the CGC framework (e.g., works on NLO corrections to k_T factorization and to the DHJ formula). We will note that, while a quantitative estimate of higher-order or non-CGC effects lies beyond the scope of the present leading-order study, the cited NLO literature indicates that such corrections are typically of comparable relative size in both schemes and do not reverse the observed preference for k_T factorization at mid-rapidity within the kinematic range considered. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constrains rcBK initial conditions (MV^γ, MV^e) to external HERA DIS data, then deploys the MC-CGC generator to produce numerical predictions for LHCb forward hadron spectra in pp collisions at new energies and rapidities. Direct comparisons of MV variants and of k_T versus DHJ factorization schemes are outputs of this framework applied to independent LHCb measurements, without any step that reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction or to a self-citation chain. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the rcBK evolution equation, the validity of the CGC effective theory for LHC kinematics, and initial-condition parameterizations fitted to HERA data; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Parameters defining MV^γ and MV^e initial conditions
    These variants are explicitly described as HERA DIS-constrained, implying numerical values chosen or fitted to match deep-inelastic scattering data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The running-coupling Balitsky-Kovchegov equation accurately describes the rapidity evolution of gluon distributions in the saturation regime
    The entire MC-CGC generator is built on this evolution equation as the dynamical core.
  • domain assumption The dilute-dense and dense-dense factorization schemes remain valid for forward and mid-rapidity production at LHC energies
    The paper directly compares these two frameworks without deriving their applicability limits from first principles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5771 in / 1614 out tokens · 59836 ms · 2026-05-19T16:02:54.363089+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · 51 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    We will also investigate observables that were not discussed in the previous work

    to achieve a consistent description of recent data from the LHCb experiment and to provide predictions for future mea- surements. We will also investigate observables that were not discussed in the previous work. This paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we explain our updated model implementing the DHJ formula and the𝑘 𝑇 factorization formula withi...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Figure 4 presents the pseudo-rapidity (𝜂) and the transverse momentum (𝑝 𝑇) distribution of charged particles, d𝑁ch/d𝜂and d𝑁 ch/d𝑝 𝑇 in pp collisions at √𝑠=7 TeV

    Particle production at LHCb As our model includes several non-perturbative processes, we calibrate our model parameters using soft-particle produc- tion measured within the LHCb acceptance. Figure 4 presents the pseudo-rapidity (𝜂) and the transverse momentum (𝑝 𝑇) distribution of charged particles, d𝑁ch/d𝜂and d𝑁 ch/d𝑝 𝑇 in pp collisions at √𝑠=7 TeV. The ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    7 presents the𝑝 𝑇 spectra at RHIC collision energy of √𝑠=200 GeV (left panel) and at the mid-rapidity region at the LHC energy of √𝑠=13 TeV (right panel)

    Particle production at RHIC and at mid-rapidity at LHC To extend the evaluation across different kinematical re- gions, Fig. 7 presents the𝑝 𝑇 spectra at RHIC collision energy of √𝑠=200 GeV (left panel) and at the mid-rapidity region at the LHC energy of √𝑠=13 TeV (right panel). Despite several minor modifications relative to the earlier implemen- tation ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    ch P(N DHJ, MV, K=1.0 , K=2.0 eDHJ, MV, K=1.4 γ DHJ, MV>0.2 GeV T LHCb pp 7TeV, p8 10×<2.5, η2.0<6 10×<3.0, η2.5<4 10×<3.5, η3.0<2 10×<4.0, η3.5<0 10×<4.5, η4.0< 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 ch N6 −104 −102 −101 2 104 106 108 1010 1012 1014

    work page

  5. [5]

    5: Charged particle multiplicity distribution𝑃(𝑁 ch)within different𝜂(left) and𝑝 𝑇 (right) bins in pp collisions at√𝑠=7 TeV

    ch P(N DHJ, MV, K=1.0 , K=2.0 eDHJ, MV, K=1.4 γ DHJ, MV<4.8 ηLHCb pp 7TeV, 2.0<8 10×<0.3, T 0.2<p6 10×<0.4, T 0.3<p4 10×<0.6, T 0.4<p2 10×<1.0, T 0.6<p0 10×<2.0, T 1.0<p FIG. 5: Charged particle multiplicity distribution𝑃(𝑁 ch)within different𝜂(left) and𝑝 𝑇 (right) bins in pp collisions at√𝑠=7 TeV. Experimental data taken from Ref. [71], with different co...

    work page

  6. [6]

    The left panel of Fig

    Hadron production In this section, we present predictions for future measure- ments with the FoCal detector. The left panel of Fig. 9 shows the predicted normalized multiplicity distribution of neutral pions,⟨𝑁 𝜋0⟩𝑃(𝑁 𝜋0)in pp collisions at √𝑠=14 TeV. With 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 〉0πN〈/0π N9 −106 −103 −101 3 106 107 10) 0 π P(N 〉 0 π N 〈 |>2 GeV p, |0πpp, 14 Te...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Jet production In the final part of this section, we provide predictions of jet observables, which are expected to have reduced sensitivity to the fragmentation effects. In these calculations, jets are recon- structed from neutral pions using the anti-𝑘 𝑇 algorithm [76] with a radius parameter𝑅=0.4, and a soft transverse- momentum cut𝑝 𝑇 ,jet >2 GeV is im...

    work page

  8. [8]

    The Color Glass Condensate and High Energy Scattering in QCD

    E. Iancu and R. Venugopalan, The Color glass condensate and high-energy scattering in QCD (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0303204

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  9. [9]

    L. D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. D49, 2233 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9309289

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  10. [10]

    L. D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. D49, 3352 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9311205

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  11. [11]

    The Color Glass Condensate

    F. Gelis, E. Iancu, J. Jalilian-Marian, and R. Venugopalan, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60, 463 (2010), arXiv:1002.0333 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  12. [12]

    K. J. Golec-Biernat and M. Wusthoff, Phys. Rev. D59, 014017 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9807513

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  13. [13]

    A. M. Stasto, K. J. Golec-Biernat, and J. Kwiecinski, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 596 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0007192

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  14. [14]

    Arsene et al

    I. Arsene et al. (BRAHMS), Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 242303 (2004), arXiv:nucl-ex/0403005

    work page arXiv 2004

  15. [15]

    Forward Neutral Pion Production in p+p and d+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV

    J. Adams et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 152302 (2006), arXiv:nucl-ex/0602011

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  16. [16]

    Suppression of back-to-back hadron pairs at forward rapidity in d+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV

    A. Adare et al. (PHENIX), Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 172301 (2011), arXiv:1105.5112 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [17]

    M. S. Abdallah et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 092501 (2022), arXiv:2111.10396 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    J. L. Albacete and C. Marquet, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.76, 1 (2014), arXiv:1401.4866 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    Observation of long-range near-side angular correlations in proton-lead collisions at the LHC

    S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS), Phys. Lett. B718, 795 (2013), arXiv:1210.5482 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  20. [20]

    Measurement of long-range pseudorapidity correlations and azimuthal harmonics in $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV proton-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector

    G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Phys. Rev. C90, 044906 (2014), arXiv:1409.1792 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    Long-range angular correlations on the near and away side in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

    B. Abelev et al. (ALICE), Phys. Lett. B719, 29 (2013), arXiv:1212.2001 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    Cronin effect and geometrical shadowing in d+Au collisions: pQCD vs. CGC

    A. Accardi and M. Gyulassy, J. Phys. G30, S969 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0402101

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  23. [23]

    Nuclear shadowing

    N. Armesto, J. Phys. G32, R367 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0604108

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    Role of parton shadowing in the comparison of p-A and A-A results on jpsi suppression at energies available at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron

    R. Arnaldi, P. Cortese, and E. Scomparin, Phys. Rev. C81, 014903 (2010), arXiv:0909.2199 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    Some Features of the Glasma

    T. Lappi and L. McLerran, Nucl. Phys. A772, 200 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0602189

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  26. [26]

    Berges, M

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venugopalan, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035003 (2021), arXiv:2005.12299 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Color Glass Condensate and Glasma

    F. Gelis, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28, 1330001 (2013), arXiv:1211.3327 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Collectivity in small collision systems : an initial state perspective

    S. Schlichting and P. Tribedy, Adv. High Energy Phys.2016, 8460349 (2016), arXiv:1611.00329 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  29. [29]

    J. F. Grosse-Oetringhaus and U. A. Wiedemann, A Decade of Collectivity in Small Systems (2024), arXiv:2407.07484 [hep- ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 142004 (2022), arXiv:2108.13115 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 042302 (2023), arXiv:2204.10608 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 102301 (2023), arXiv:2205.03936 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Study of exclusive photoproduction of charmonium in ultra-peripheral lead-lead collisions (2023), arXiv:2206.08221 [hep-ex]. [27]ALICE. Collaboration, tech. rep. (2020)

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report

    R. Abdul Khalek et al., Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022), arXiv:2103.05419 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Engel, D

    R. Engel, D. Heck, and T. Pierog, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.61, 467 (2011)

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    J. L. Albacete, N. Armesto, J. G. Milhano, and C. A. Salgado, Phys. Rev. D80, 034031 (2009), arXiv:0902.1112 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  37. [37]

    J. L. Albacete, N. Armesto, J. G. Milhano, P. Quiroga-Arias, and C. A. Salgado, Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1705 (2011), arXiv:1012.4408 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  38. [38]

    Balitsky, Phys

    I. Balitsky, Phys. Rev. D75, 014001 (2007), arXiv:hep- ph/0609105

    work page arXiv 2007

  39. [39]

    Y. V. Kovchegov and H. Weigert, Nucl. Phys. A784, 188 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0609090

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  40. [40]

    The Color Glass Condensate and hadron production in the forward region

    A. Dumitru, A. Hayashigaki, and J. Jalilian-Marian, Nucl. Phys. A765, 464 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0506308

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  41. [41]

    Forward particle productions at RHIC and the LHC from CGC within local rcBK evolution

    H. Fujii, K. Itakura, Y. Kitadono, and Y. Nara, J. Phys. G38, 124125 (2011), arXiv:1107.1333 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  42. [42]

    J. L. Albacete, A. Dumitru, H. Fujii, and Y. Nara, Nucl. Phys. A 897, 1 (2013), arXiv:1209.2001 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  43. [43]

    Single inclusive particle production at high energy from HERA data to proton-nucleus collisions

    T. Lappi and H. M ¨antysaari, Phys. Rev. D88, 114020 (2013), arXiv:1309.6963 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  44. [44]

    Color Glass Condensate at the LHC: hadron multiplicities in $pp$, $pA$ and $AA$ collisions

    D. Kharzeev, E. Levin, and M. Nardi, Nucl. Phys. A747, 609 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0408050

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  45. [45]

    NLO evolution of color dipoles

    I. Balitsky and G. A. Chirilli, Phys. Rev. D77, 014019 (2008), arXiv:0710.4330 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  46. [46]

    G. A. Chirilli, B.-W. Xiao, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 122301 (2012), arXiv:1112.1061 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  47. [47]

    Y. Shi, L. Wang, S.-Y. Wei, and B.-W. Xiao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 202302 (2022), arXiv:2112.06975 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    H.-y. Liu, K. Xie, Z. Kang, and X. Liu, Single inclusive jet production in pA collisions at NLO in the small-x regime (2022), arXiv:2204.03026 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Glasma flux tubes and the near side ridge phenomenon at RHIC

    A. Dumitru, F. Gelis, L. McLerran, and R. Venugopalan, Nucl. Phys. A810, 91 (2008), arXiv:0804.3858 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  50. [50]

    High energy factorization in nucleus-nucleus collisions

    F. Gelis, T. Lappi, and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. D78, 054019 (2008), arXiv:0804.2630 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  51. [51]

    Forward dihadron correlations in deuteron-gold collisions with a Gaussian approximation of JIMWLK

    T. Lappi and H. Mantysaari, Nucl. Phys. A908, 51 (2013), arXiv:1209.2853 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    Caucal, Z.-B

    P. Caucal, Z.-B. Kang, P. Korcyl, F. Salazar, B. Schenke, T. Stebel, R. Venugopalan, and W. Zhao, Probing gluon sat- uration with forward di-hadron correlations in proton-nucleus collisions (2025), arXiv:2512.21466 [hep-ph]. 13

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    The Wilson renormalization group for low x physics: towards the high density regime

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov, and H. Weigert, Phys. Rev. D59, 014014 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9706377

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  54. [54]

    The Renormalization Group Equation for the Color Glass Condensate

    E. Iancu, A. Leonidov, and L. D. McLerran, Phys. Lett. B510, 133 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0102009

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  55. [55]

    Event-by-event gluon multiplicity, energy density and eccentricities at RHIC and LHC

    B. Schenke, P. Tribedy, and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. C86, 034908 (2012), arXiv:1206.6805 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [56]

    Mass ordering of spectra from fragmentation of saturated gluon states in high multiplicity proton-proton collisions

    B. Schenke, S. Schlichting, P. Tribedy, and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 162301 (2016), arXiv:1607.02496 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  57. [57]

    Bhattacharya, F

    A. Bhattacharya, F. Kling, I. Sarcevic, and A. M. Stasto, Phys. Rev. D109, 014040 (2024), arXiv:2306.01578 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    W.-T. Deng, H. Fujii, K. Itakura, and Y. Nara, Phys. Rev. D91, 014006 (2015), arXiv:1410.2018 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

    C. Bierlich et al., SciPost Phys. Codeb.2022, 8 (2022), arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    F. O. Duraes, A. V. Giannini, V. P. Goncalves, and F. S. Navarra, Phys. Rev. C89, 035205 (2014), arXiv:1401.7888 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  61. [61]

    Gluon saturation and inclusive hadron production at LHC

    E. Levin and A. H. Rezaeian, Phys. Rev. D82, 014022 (2010), arXiv:1005.0631 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  62. [62]

    R. D. Ball et al. (NNPDF), Eur. Phys. J. C77, 663 (2017), arXiv:1706.00428 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    Yan, T.-J

    M. Yan, T.-J. Hou, P. Nadolsky, and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 107, 116001 (2023), arXiv:2205.00137 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Combination of Measurements of Inclusive Deep Inelastic $e^{\pm}p$ Scattering Cross Sections and QCD Analysis of HERA Data

    H. Abramowicz et al. (H1, ZEUS), Eur. Phys. J. C75, 580 (2015), arXiv:1506.06042 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  65. [65]

    KNO scaling of fluctuations in pp and pA, and eccentricities in heavy-ion collisions

    A. Dumitru and Y. Nara, Phys. Rev. C85, 034907 (2012), arXiv:1201.6382 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    Arnison et al

    G. Arnison et al. (UA1), Phys. Lett. B123, 108 (1983)

    work page 1983

  67. [67]

    G. J. Alner et al. (UA5), Phys. Lett. B160, 193 (1985)

    work page 1985

  68. [68]

    G. J. Alner et al. (UA5), Phys. Lett. B160, 199 (1985)

    work page 1985

  69. [69]

    G. J. Alner et al. (UA5), Phys. Lett. B167, 476 (1986)

    work page 1986

  70. [70]

    Collective dynamics of the high-energy proton-nucleus collisions

    P. Bozek and W. Broniowski, Phys. Rev. C88, 014903 (2013), arXiv:1304.3044 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    J. S. Moreland, J. E. Bernhard, and S. A. Bass, Phys. Rev. C92, 011901 (2015), arXiv:1412.4708 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  72. [72]

    Sjostrand, Phys

    T. Sjostrand, Phys. Lett. B157, 321 (1985)

    work page 1985

  73. [73]

    Marchesini and B

    G. Marchesini and B. R. Webber, Nucl. Phys. B310, 461 (1988)

    work page 1988

  74. [74]

    PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0603175

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  75. [75]

    A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Com- mun.178, 852 (2008), arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  76. [76]

    Wang and M

    X.-N. Wang and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Rev. D44, 3501 (1991)

    work page 1991

  77. [77]

    Measurement of charged particle multiplicities and densities in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7\;$TeV in the forward region

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Eur. Phys. J. C74, 2888 (2014), arXiv:1402.4430 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  78. [78]

    Intrinsic Fluctuations of the Proton Saturation Momentum Scale in High Multiplicity p+p Collisions

    L. McLerran and P. Tribedy, Nucl. Phys. A945, 216 (2016), arXiv:1508.03292 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  79. [79]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Measurement of prompt charged- particle production in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV (2022), arXiv:2107.10090 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Phys. Rev. C109, 024907 (2024), arXiv:2310.17326 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.