pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24094 · v1 · pith:KPKHX72Cnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.HE

Neutron Star Bounds on Muonic Fifth Forces from Picometer to Kilometer Scales

Damiano F. G. Fiorillo , Alessandro Lella , Georg G. Raffelt , Nudzeim Selimovic , Edoardo Vitagliano This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 15:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.HE
keywords neutron starsfifth forcesmuonscooling boundshydrostatic equilibriumscalar bosonsvector bosonsbeyond standard model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Neutron stars with abundant muons impose coupling limits on fifth forces three orders of magnitude stronger than supernova data across picometer-to-kilometer ranges.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that neutron stars contain far more muons than ordinary matter, so any fifth force acting on muons would alter their cooling rates and internal pressure balance in observable ways. From this it extracts upper limits on the scalar and vector couplings that are thousands of times tighter than those inferred from SN 1987A for mediator masses up to 100 keV. For even lighter mediators the requirement that the star remain in hydrostatic equilibrium supplies still stronger constraints. A reader would care because the method turns an astrophysical object into a sensitive probe for lepton-specific new physics that laboratory experiments struggle to reach due to muon scarcity.

Core claim

Neutron-star cooling implies limits of g_φμ ≲ 10^{-12} and g_Vμ ≲ 3×10^{-13} on scalar and vector bosons with masses m_X ≲ 100 keV, whereas SN 1987A cooling implies only g ≲ 3×10^{-9}. Moreover, hydrostatic equilibrium requires any long-range muonic force to be sufficiently weak, surpassing cooling bounds for m_X ≲ 10^{-5} eV. Together, these observables provide the most stringent probes of muonic interactions over distance scales ranging from picometers to kilometers.

What carries the argument

The muon population inside a neutron star and the way an additional muonic force would change its cooling luminosity and hydrostatic structure.

If this is right

  • The cooling bounds already exceed SN 1987A limits by three orders of magnitude for m_X up to 100 keV.
  • Hydrostatic equilibrium supplies the dominant constraint for m_X below 10^{-5} eV.
  • The combined limits cover mediator masses whose Compton wavelengths span picometers to kilometers.
  • Neutron stars thereby become the leading laboratory for muonic fifth forces in this mass window.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Laboratory experiments searching for muonic forces would need to reach couplings below 10^{-12} to compete with these astrophysical bounds.
  • The same logic could be applied to other compact objects if they contain significant muon populations, though the paper focuses on neutron stars.
  • Future precise measurements of neutron-star cooling curves could directly test or tighten the reported limits.

Load-bearing premise

Standard neutron-star cooling and hydrostatic models remain valid when a muonic fifth force is added, so that any mismatch with observed temperatures or radii can be attributed only to the new force.

What would settle it

Observation of a neutron star whose surface temperature or radius requires a muonic scalar or vector coupling larger than the stated limits for a mediator in the relevant mass window.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24094 by Alessandro Lella, Damiano F. G. Fiorillo, Edoardo Vitagliano, Georg G. Raffelt, Nudzeim Selimovic.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Bounds on the coupling of muonic scalars ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Two-loop muonic scalar interaction with protons. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Profile of our reference NS model at the epoch when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Experimental searches for fifth forces coupled to muons are fundamentally limited by the scarcity of muons in ordinary matter, whereas neutron stars contain abundant muon populations. We show that these compact objects therefore provide superior sensitivity across a broad range of mediator masses. Neutron-star cooling implies limits of $g_{\phi\mu}\lesssim10^{-12}$ and $g_{V\!\mu}\lesssim3\times10^{-13}$ on scalar and vector bosons with masses $m_X\lesssim100$ keV, whereas SN 1987A cooling implies only $g\lesssim3\times10^{-9}$. Moreover, hydrostatic equilibrium requires any long-range muonic force to be sufficiently weak, surpassing cooling bounds for $m_X\lesssim10^{-5}$ eV. Together, these observables provide the most stringent probes of muonic interactions over distance scales ranging from picometers to kilometers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that neutron stars, owing to their abundant muon populations, yield stronger constraints on muonic fifth forces than SN 1987A. Neutron-star cooling is used to bound scalar and vector mediators with g_φμ ≲ 10^{-12} and g_Vμ ≲ 3×10^{-13} for m_X ≲ 100 keV, while hydrostatic equilibrium supplies tighter limits for m_X ≲ 10^{-5} eV, together probing muonic interactions from picometer to kilometer scales.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions hold after robustness checks, the result would meaningfully extend fifth-force searches into muon-coupled sectors that are hard to access terrestrially, leveraging standard astrophysical observables without introducing new free parameters. The approach of applying existing NS cooling and structure frameworks to a new interaction is a clear strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Cooling bounds section] Cooling analysis (section deriving the g_φμ and g_Vμ limits): the quoted bounds assume that any additional emissivity or energy transport from the muonic force produces an observable deviation from standard cooling curves that cannot be offset by plausible variations in the EOS, muon fraction, or superfluid gaps. No explicit scan or marginalization over these uncertain inputs is described, which directly affects whether the numerical limits follow.
  2. [Hydrostatic equilibrium section] Hydrostatic equilibrium analysis (section on long-range forces): the claim that hydrostatic equilibrium supplies bounds surpassing cooling for m_X ≲ 10^{-5} eV likewise presupposes that observed NS masses and radii cannot be reproduced once the new long-range potential is included by adjusting other model parameters. This assumption is load-bearing for the statement that hydrostatic limits are stronger in that mass window.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the notation g_Vμ employs nonstandard spacing; standard subscript formatting g_{Vμ} would improve readability.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: numerical results are stated without cross-references to the specific equations or figures that contain the derivations, which would help readers trace the steps.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and for recognizing the potential of neutron-star observables to constrain muonic fifth forces. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Cooling bounds section] Cooling analysis (section deriving the g_φμ and g_Vμ limits): the quoted bounds assume that any additional emissivity or energy transport from the muonic force produces an observable deviation from standard cooling curves that cannot be offset by plausible variations in the EOS, muon fraction, or superfluid gaps. No explicit scan or marginalization over these uncertain inputs is described, which directly affects whether the numerical limits follow.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit marginalization would further strengthen the presentation. Our bounds are derived using representative EOS and cooling models (e.g., APR and BSk families with standard muon fractions and superfluid gaps) that already reproduce observed NS temperatures. The additional muonic emissivity scales directly with muon density and is large enough that even order-of-magnitude variations in the uncertain parameters shift the quoted limits by at most a factor of a few while remaining stronger than the SN 1987A bound. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph quantifying this sensitivity and stating the conservative nature of the limits. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Hydrostatic equilibrium section] Hydrostatic equilibrium analysis (section on long-range forces): the claim that hydrostatic equilibrium supplies bounds surpassing cooling for m_X ≲ 10^{-5} eV likewise presupposes that observed NS masses and radii cannot be reproduced once the new long-range potential is included by adjusting other model parameters. This assumption is load-bearing for the statement that hydrostatic limits are stronger in that mass window.

    Authors: For the long-range regime the additional potential is effectively a constant shift to the gravitational potential inside the star. We show that reproducing the observed 2 M_⊙ maximum mass while satisfying causality and the measured radius range requires the effective coupling to remain below the quoted threshold; larger values force the EOS into unphysical regimes (negative pressure or superluminal sound speed) that are already excluded by nuclear-physics constraints independent of the fifth force. We will expand the text with an explicit statement of this argument and a brief illustration that EOS adjustments cannot compensate without violating these independent bounds. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: bounds derived from external NS observables and standard models

full rationale

The derivation applies standard neutron-star cooling theory and hydrostatic equilibrium to observed temperatures, radii, and SN1987A data to extract upper limits on g_φμ and g_Vμ. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, invokes a self-citation as the sole justification for a uniqueness theorem, or renames an input as an output. The central results remain independent of any internal fit or self-referential definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions about neutron-star composition and cooling; the new bosons are postulated entities whose couplings are bounded rather than derived.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Neutron stars contain abundant muon populations that can mediate new forces
    Explicitly invoked in the abstract as the reason neutron stars outperform ordinary matter.
  • domain assumption Observed neutron-star cooling and hydrostatic equilibrium can be used to bound additional interactions
    The translation from observables to coupling limits assumes standard cooling and structure models remain applicable.
invented entities (1)
  • Light scalar or vector boson mediating muonic fifth force no independent evidence
    purpose: To carry a new force that couples exclusively to muons
    Postulated new particle whose mass and coupling are constrained by the astrophysical observables.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5700 in / 1483 out tokens · 56127 ms · 2026-06-30T15:53:44.916637+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Minimal Proton-Mass Dark Matter

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A minimal dark matter model with one complex scalar carrying B and L numbers, stabilized by proton stability, with mass near the proton mass and relic density from UV freeze-in.

  2. New Gauge Forces, Neutron Stars and Schwinger Neutrino Production

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    For Lμ-Lτ gauge forces with g ≳ 10^{-18}, Schwinger neutrino production in neutron stars alters composition, invalidates merger constraints at g ≳ 10^{-17}, and could yield detectable ~100 MeV neutrino fluxes from you...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. O. Sushkov, W. J. Kim, D. A. R. Dalvit and S. K. Lamoreaux,New Experimental Limits on Non-Newtonian Forces in the Micrometer Range,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 171101 [1108.2547]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  2. [2]

    Y. J. Chen, W. K. Tham, D. E. Krause, D. Lopez, E. Fischbach and R. S. Decca,Stronger Limits on Hypothetical Yukawa Interactions in the 30–8000 nm Range,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 221102 [1410.7267]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    A. A. Geraci, S. J. Smullin, D. M. Weld, J. Chiaverini and A. Kapitulnik,Improved constraints on non-Newtonian forces at 10 microns,Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 022002 [0802.2350]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  4. [4]

    D. J. Kapner, T. S. Cook, E. G. Adelberger, J. H. Gundlach, B. R. Heckel, C. D. Hoyle and H. E. Swanson, Tests of the gravitational inverse-square law below the dark-energy length scale,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 021101 [hep-ph/0611184]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  5. [5]

    J. G. Lee, E. G. Adelberger, T. S. Cook, S. M. Fleischer and B. R. Heckel,New Test of the Gravitational1/r 2 Law at Separations down to 52 µm,Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020) 101101 [2002.11761]

    work page arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    G. L. Smith, C. D. Hoyle, J. H. Gundlach, E. G. Adelberger, B. R. Heckel and H. E. Swanson,Short range tests of the equivalence principle,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 022001 [2405.10982]

    work page arXiv 2000

  7. [7]

    Yang, B.-F

    S.-Q. Yang, B.-F. Zhan, Q.-L. Wang, C.-G. Shao, L.-C. Tu, W.-H. Tan and J. Luo,Test of the Gravitational Inverse Square Law at Millimeter Ranges,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 081101

    2012

  8. [8]

    Tan et al.,Improvement for Testing the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law at the Submillimeter Range,Phys

    W.-H. Tan et al.,Improvement for Testing the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law at the Submillimeter Range,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 051301

    2020

  9. [9]

    J. K. Hoskins, R. D. Newman, R. Spero and J. Schultz, Experimental tests of the gravitational inverse square law for mass separations from 2-cm to 105-cm,Phys. Rev. D 32(1985) 3084

    1985

  10. [10]

    MICROSCOPE mission: first constraints on the violation of the weak equivalence principle by a light scalar dilaton

    J. Berg´ e, P. Brax, G. M´ etris, M. Pernot-Borr` as, P. Touboul and J.-P. Uzan,MICROSCOPE Mission: First Constraints on the Violation of the Weak 6 Equivalence Principle by a Light Scalar Dilaton,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 141101 [1712.00483]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Foot,New Physics From Electric Charge Quantization?,Mod

    R. Foot,New Physics From Electric Charge Quantization?,Mod. Phys. Lett. A6(1991) 527

    1991

  12. [12]

    X. G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew and R. R. Volkas,New- Z ′ phenomenology,Phys. Rev. D43(1991) 22

    1991

  13. [13]

    X.-G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew and R. R. Volkas, SimplestZ ′ model,Phys. Rev. D44(1991) 2118

    1991

  14. [14]

    R. Foot, X. G. He, H. Lew and R. R. Volkas,Model for a lightZ ′ boson,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 4571 [hep-ph/9401250]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  15. [15]

    Flavor-specific scalar mediators

    B. Batell, A. Freitas, A. Ismail and D. Mckeen, Flavor-specific scalar mediators,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 055026 [1712.10022]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Batell, A

    B. Batell, A. Freitas, A. Ismail, D. McKeen and M. Rai, Renormalizable models of flavor-specific scalars,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 115032 [2107.08059]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    The landscape of QCD axion models

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi and L. Visinelli,The landscape of QCD axion models,Phys. Rept.870(2020) 1 [2003.01100]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Kumar Poddar, S

    T. Kumar Poddar, S. Mohanty and S. Jana,Vector gauge boson radiation from compact binary systems in a gaugedL µ −L τ scenario,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 123023 [1908.09732]

    work page arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    J. A. Dror, R. Laha and T. Opferkuch,Probing muonic forces with neutron star binaries,Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 023005 [1909.12845]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Bollig, W

    R. Bollig, W. DeRocco, P. W. Graham and H.-T. Janka, Muons in Supernovae: Implications for the Axion-Muon Coupling,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 051104 [2005.07141]. ErratumPhys. Rev. Lett.126, 189901 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Croon, G

    D. Croon, G. Elor, R. K. Leane and S. D. McDermott, Supernova Muons: New Constraints onZ ′ Bosons, Axions and ALPs,JHEP01(2021) 107 [2006.13942]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Muonic Boson Limits: Supernova Redux

    A. Caputo, G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano,Muonic boson limits: Supernova redux,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 035022 [2109.03244]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Akita, S

    K. Akita, S. H. Im, M. Masud and S. Yun,Limits on heavy neutral leptons,Z ′ bosons and majorons from high-energy supernova neutrinos,JHEP07(2024) 057 [2312.13627]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    $L_\mu-L_\tau$ gauge bosons in beam dumps and supernovae

    N. Blinov, P. J. Fox, K. J. Kelly, R. Plestid and T. Zhou, Lµ −L τ gauge bosons in beam dumps and supernovae, 2511.09619

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    B. L. Friman and O. V. Maxwell,Neutron Star Neutrino Emissivities,Astrophys. J.232(1979) 541

    1979

  26. [26]

    Bottaro, A

    S. Bottaro, A. Caputo and D. F. G. Fiorillo,Neutrino emission in cold neutron stars: Bremsstrahlung and modified urca rates reexamined,JCAP11(2024) 015 [2406.18640]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Iwamoto,Axion Emission from Neutron Stars,Phys

    N. Iwamoto,Axion Emission from Neutron Stars,Phys. Rev. Lett.53(1984) 1198

    1984

  28. [28]

    Ishizuka and M

    N. Ishizuka and M. Yoshimura,Axion and Dilaton Emissivity from Nascent Neutron Stars,Prog. Theor. Phys.84(1990) 233

    1990

  29. [29]

    Buschmann, C

    M. Buschmann, C. Dessert, J. W. Foster, A. J. Long and B. R. Safdi,Upper Limit on the QCD Axion Mass from Isolated Neutron Star Cooling,Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 091102 [2111.09892]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition,

    A. Caputo and G. Raffelt,Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition,PoSCOSMICWISPers(2024) 041 [2401.13728]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, A. Lella, C. A. J. O’Hare and E. Vitagliano,Leading Bounds on Micrometer to Picometer Fifth Forces from Neutron Star Cooling,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 211003 [2506.19906]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    M. J. Dolan, F. J. Hiskens and R. R. Volkas,Advancing globular cluster constraints on the axion-photon coupling, JCAP10(2022) 096 [2207.03102]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Langhoff, N

    K. Langhoff, N. J. Outmezguine and N. L. Rodd, Irreducible Axion Background,Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022) 241101 [2209.06216]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Li and X.-J

    S.-P. Li and X.-J. Xu,Production rates of dark photons and Z’ in the Sun and stellar cooling bounds,JCAP09 (2023) 009 [2304.12907]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    M. J. Dolan, F. J. Hiskens and R. R. Volkas, Constraining dark photons with self-consistent simulations of globular cluster stars,JCAP05(2024) 099 [2306.13335]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Cosmology With a Very Light $L_\mu - L_\tau$ Gauge Boson

    M. Escudero, D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic and M. Pierre, Cosmology with A Very Light L µ −L τ Gauge Boson, JHEP03(2019) 071 [1901.02010]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Page,NSCool: Neutron star cooling code, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1609.009, Sept., 2016

    D. Page,NSCool: Neutron star cooling code, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1609.009, Sept., 2016

    2016

  38. [38]

    The equation of state for nucleon matter and neutron star structure

    A. Akmal, V. R. Pandharipande and D. G. Ravenhall, The Equation of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure,Phys. Rev. C58(1998) 1804 [nucl-th/9804027]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  39. [39]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, T. Pitik and E. Vitagliano,Supernova production of axionlike particles coupling to electrons, reloaded,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083008 [2503.15630]. Erratum:Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 089902

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    P. S. Shternin and D. G. Yakovlev,Electron-muon heat conduction in neutron star cores via the exchange of transverse plasmons,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 103004 [0705.1963]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  41. [41]

    P. S. Shternin and D. G. Yakovlev,Electron thermal conductivity owing to collisions between degenerate electrons,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 043004 [astro-ph/0608371]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  42. [42]

    P. S. Shternin,Neutrino-Pair Bremsstrahlung Due to Electromagnetic Collisions in Neutron Star Cores Revisited,Particles8(2025) 100 [2512.08780]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    L. B. Leinson and A. Perez,Collective effects in neutrino anti-neutrino synchrotron radiation from neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 043002 [astro-ph/9710257]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  44. [44]

    L. B. Leinson,Neutrino pair emission due to electron phonon scattering in a neutron star crust: A reappraisal, Phys. Lett. B469(1999) 166 [hep-ph/0009049]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  45. [45]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, A. Lella, G. G. Raffelt, N. Selimovi´ c and E. Vitagliano,Production of Leptophilic Bosons in Ultradegenerate Relativistic Matter, 2026. Work in Progress

    2026

  46. [46]

    Black Hole Superradiance Signatures of Ultralight Vectors

    M. Baryakhtar, R. Lasenby and M. Teo,Black Hole Superradiance Signatures of Ultralight Vectors,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 035019 [1704.05081]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, M. Heinlein, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt, E. Vitagliano and R. Bollig,Supernova simulations confront SN 1987A neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 083040 [2308.01403]. [48]https:// . See Supplemental Material for a discussion of possible constraints from scalar decays in photon pairs and details on our calculation for the loop-induced scalar cou...

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    R. S. Decca, D. Lopez, E. Fischbach, G. L. Klimchitskaya, D. E. Krause and V. M. Mostepanenko, 7 Tests of new physics from precise measurements of the Casimir pressure between two gold-coated plates,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 077101 [hep-ph/0703290]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  49. [49]

    C. P. Blakemore, A. Fieguth, A. Kawasaki, N. Priel, D. Martin, A. D. Rider, Q. Wang and G. Gratta,Search for non-Newtonian interactions at micrometer scale with a levitated test mass,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) L061101 [2102.06848]

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    Optomechanical vector sensing of new forces at 6 micron separation

    G. Venugopalan et al.,Optomechanical vector sensing of new forces at 6 micron separation,Sci. Rep.16(2026) 5180 [2412.13167]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    H. C. Chiu, G. L. Klimchitskaya, V. N. Marachevsky, V. M. Mostepanenko and U. Mohideen,Demonstration of the asymmetric lateral Casimir force between corrugated surfaces in the nonadditive regime,Phys. Rev. B80(2009) 121402 [0909.2161]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  52. [52]

    V. B. Bezerra, G. L. Klimchitskaya, V. M. Mostepanenko and C. Romero,Advance and prospects in constraining the Yukawa-type corrections to Newtonian gravity from the Casimir effect,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 055003 [1002.2141]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  53. [53]

    A. A. Banishev, J. Wagner, T. Emig, R. Zandi and U. Mohideen,Demonstration of Angle Dependent Casimir Force Between Corrugations,Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(2013) 250403 [1212.6271]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  54. [54]

    A. A. Banishev, J. Wagner, T. Emig, R. Zandi and U. Mohideen,Experimental and theoretical investigation of the angular dependence of the Casimir force between sinusoidally corrugated surfaces,Phys. Rev. B89(2014) 235436 [1402.2716]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  55. [55]

    J. E. J. Matias, A. S. Lemos and F. Dahia,Probing short-distance modifications of gravity via spin-independent and spin-dependent effects in muonic atoms,Eur. Phys. J. Plus141(2026) 328 [2511.00719]

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Probing short-range gravity using quantum reflection

    J. Boynewicz and C. A. Sackett,Probing short-range gravity using quantum reflection,2511.08770

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Y.-C. Ren, F. Xu, W. Broer, X.-J. Chen and F. Xue, Field-Tunable Meissner-Levitated Ferromagnetic Microsphere Sensor for Cryogenic Casimir and Short-Range Gravity Tests,2602.13829

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    D. F. Bartlett and S. Loegl,Limits on an Electromagnetic Fifth Force,Phys. Rev. Lett.61(1988) 2285

    1988

  59. [59]

    Kroff and P

    D. Kroff and P. C. Malta,Constraining hidden photons via atomic force microscope measurements and the Plimpton-Lawton experiment,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 095015 [2008.02209]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    D. F. G. Fiorillo, G. G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano,Strong Supernova 1987A Constraints on Bosons Decaying to Neutrinos,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 021001 [2209.11773]. [62]KATRINCollaboration, M. Aker et al.,Direct neutrino-mass measurement based on 259 days of KATRIN data,Science388(2025) adq9592 [2406.13516]. [63]LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL...

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    T. E. Riley et al.,A N ICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation,Astrophys. J. Lett.887(2019) L21 [1912.05702]

    work page arXiv 2019

  62. [62]

    M. C. Miller et al.,PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius fromN ICERData and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter,Astrophys. J. Lett.887(2019) L24 [1912.05705]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  63. [63]

    Burns,Neutron Star Mergers and How to Study Them,Living Rev

    E. Burns,Neutron Star Mergers and How to Study Them,Living Rev. Rel.23(2020) 4 [1909.06085]

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    C. D. Capano, I. Tews, S. M. Brown, B. Margalit, S. De, S. Kumar, D. A. Brown, B. Krishnan and S. Reddy, Stringent constraints on neutron-star radii from multimessenger observations and nuclear theory,Nature Astron.4(2020) 625 [1908.10352]

    work page arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Hyperon stars in the Brueckner-Bethe-Goldstone theory

    M. Baldo, G. F. Burgio and H. J. Schulze,Hyperon stars in the Brueckner-Bethe-Goldstone theory,Phys. Rev. C 61(2000) 055801 [nucl-th/9912066]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  66. [66]

    B. Bhat, A. Dohi, T. Muto and T. Noda,Cooling of Isolated Neutron Stars with Hyperon-mixed Kaon-Condensation Matter,2605.09723

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [67]

    Light Dark Matter: Models and Constraints

    S. Knapen, T. Lin and K. M. Zurek,Light Dark Matter: Models and Constraints,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 115021 [1709.07882]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  68. [68]

    Vitagliano, I

    E. Vitagliano, I. Tamborra and G. Raffelt,Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum at Earth: Sources and Spectral Components,Rev. Mod. Phys.92(2020) 45006 [1910.11878]

    work page arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    D. E. Gruber, J. L. Matteson, L. E. Peterson and G. V. Jung,The spectrum of diffuse cosmic hard x-rays measured with HEAO-1,Astrophys. J.520(1999) 124 [astro-ph/9903492]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  70. [70]

    Krivonos, D

    R. Krivonos, D. Wik, B. Grefenstette, K. Madsen, K. Perez, S. Rossland, S. Sazonov and A. Zoglauer, N uST ARmeasurement of the cosmic X-ray background in the 3–20 keV energy band,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.502(2021) 3966 [2011.11469]

    work page arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Neutron stars from young nearby associations the origin of RXJ1605.3+3249

    N. Tetzlaff, J. G. Schmidt, M. M. Hohle and R. Neuhaeuser,Neutron stars from young nearby associations the origin of RXJ1605.3+3249,Publ. Astron. 8 Soc. Austral.29(2012) 98 [1202.1388]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  72. [72]

    Jansen, D

    F. Jansen, D. Lumb, B. Altieri, J. Clavel, M. Ehle, C. Erd, C. Gabriel, M. Guainazzi, P. Gondoin, R. Much, R. Munoz, M. Santos, N. Schartel, D. Texier and G. Vacanti,XMM-Newton observatory. I. The spacecraft and operations,A&A365(2001) L1

    2001

  73. [73]

    European Space Agency, XMM-Newton Users Handbook, Section 3.3.8; accessed 21 May 2026

    XMM-Newton Science Operations Centre,XMM-Newton Users Handbook: EPIC’s sensitivity limits, https://xmm-tools.cosmos.esa.int/external/xmm_ user_support/documentation/uhb/epicsens.html. European Space Agency, XMM-Newton Users Handbook, Section 3.3.8; accessed 21 May 2026. End Matter Reference neutron star model—To illustrate the properties of medium-aged NS...

    2026