Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 135 references

Gravity on two intersecting null surfaces is quantized to a single on-shell operator algebra built from corner symmetries.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 18:05 UTC pith:5OJZNVLB

load-bearing objection A coherent candidate on-shell algebra for the double-null CIVP that treats supertranslations as CP maps and glues via a bi-crossed product; the measure gap is real but does not erase the construction. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.07785 v1 pith:5OJZNVLB submitted 2026-07-08 hep-th gr-qc

Quantization of Gravity on Null Hypersurfaces

Luca Ciambelli , Marc S. Klinger This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords characteristic initial value problemnull hypersurfacescorner symmetriessupertranslationscrossed productStinespring dilationoperator algebrasgravitational constraints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs an operator-algebraic quantization of the characteristic initial value problem of general relativity. The classical CIVP says that the bulk metric in a local spacetime region is fixed by free data on a pair of intersecting null hypersurfaces and by how those hypersurfaces are glued at their shared two-dimensional corner. The authors first quantize each null surface separately, guided by its corner symmetries (superboosts, superrotations, and future-directed supertranslations). Superboosts and superrotations act by automorphisms and are used, via crossed products, to impose the gravitational constraints as operator equations. Supertranslations do not preserve the algebra; they act by completely positive maps and are brought inside the algebra by a generalized Stinespring dilation. The two hypersurface algebras are then glued at the joint cut so that area and Hájiček data match and the two expansions interact non-trivially. The outcome is a candidate for the on-shell algebra of a gravitational subregion bounded by a pair of null surfaces, valid in the local caustic-free domain of the CIVP.

Core claim

The authors obtain a single operator algebra A_□• that quantizes the full double-null characteristic initial value problem. It is assembled by quantizing each null hypersurface with its corner symmetry (semi)group, imposing Raychaudhuri and Damour constraints by a crossed product with superboosts and superrotations, incorporating supertranslations as quantum channels via Stinespring dilation, and gluing the two branches so that pure corner data are identified while the expansions satisfy a non-trivial relative algebra fixed by the CIVP gluing data.

What carries the argument

The glued CIVP algebra A_□•, formed as the relative tensor product of two on-shell hypersurface algebras (each a semigroup crossed product by positive supertranslations followed by a group crossed product by superboosts and superrotations) quotiented by corner charge matching.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes that the infinite-dimensional groups of superboosts, superrotations and supertranslations admit quasi-invariant measures so that their group and semigroup algebras can be defined as concrete C*-algebras.

What would settle it

Show that no quasi-invariant measure exists on Diff(C)⋉C^∞(C)_B (or on the positive supertranslation semigroup) that is compatible with the required automorphic and completely-positive actions, so that the representations ℓ• and w_□ and the subsequent crossed products cannot be constructed.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A gravitational subregion bounded by two null surfaces acquires a concrete candidate for its on-shell operator algebra in the caustic-free domain.
  • Supertranslations act as quantum channels rather than automorphisms, so null time evolution is irreversible and nesting, not unitary.
  • The two expansions fail to commute by a central extension fixed by the corner gluing data, realizing a double-null shockwave-type algebra.
  • Relational real-time evolution is generated by the sum of the two expansion charges and produces nested families of CIVP algebras.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the algebra admits a faithful semifinite weight, subregion entropy could be defined without adding external edge modes.
  • The same gluing pattern may extend beyond vacuum gravity to include matter fluxes on the null surfaces.
  • Vacuum transition amplitudes between differently dressed corner states could furnish concrete, amplified signatures of quantum geometry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a candidate operator-algebraic quantization of the characteristic initial value problem (CIVP) for vacuum GR. After reviewing the classical CIVP data on a pair of intersecting null hypersurfaces and their corner symmetries (superboosts/superrotations G• and positive supertranslations G⁺_□), it quantizes each hypersurface kinematically: the bulk phase space to a Weyl algebra A_⧸, G• to a group algebra A_• via a quasi-invariant measure, and G⁺_□ to a semigroup algebra A_□ via Wiener–Hopf isometries. Supertranslations act by completely positive maps, which are dilated (via a generalized Stinespring theorem) to endomorphisms and incorporated by a semigroup crossed product; superboosts/superrotations are then imposed by an ordinary crossed product that enforces the Raychaudhuri–Damour constraints. The two on-shell hypersurface algebras are finally glued by a diagonal quotient on the pure-corner data and a bi-crossed product of the two supertranslation semigroups whose commutation relations are fixed by the gluing data ○, yielding the proposed CIVP algebra A_□•.

Significance. If the construction can be made fully rigorous, it would supply a concrete on-shell algebra for a double-null gravitational subregion, unifying several recent strands (null phase spaces, corner symmetries, CP-map treatment of supertranslations, and crossed-product constraint quantization). The classical reorganization of CIVP data, the clean separation of automorphic versus CP actions, and the explicit gluing prescription are genuine contributions that go beyond existing single-null or asymptotic constructions. The work is therefore of clear interest to the algebraic-QFT/quantum-gravity community, even while remaining a candidate rather than a completed theorem.

major comments (3)
  1. §3.2.1–3.2.2: The concrete C*-algebras A_• and A_□ (and therefore every subsequent crossed product) are defined via quasi-invariant measures dν_• on Diff(C)⋉C^∞(C)_B and dν_□ on C^∞(C)_T (and its positive cone). The text only cites existence for Diff on compact manifolds [112] and a Gaussian construction for pure superboosts [76]; it does not prove, or even sketch, the existence of a measure that is simultaneously quasi-invariant under the full semidirect product and under the positive supertranslation semigroup. Without such measures the representations ℓ•, w□ remain formal and the claim that a concrete operator algebra has been constructed is not secured.
  2. §4.1, after Eq. (98): The construction of the semigroup crossed product A_□ assumes that a family of Stinespring dilation pairs {v_g, θ_g} can be chosen so that θ: G⁺_□ → End(A_⧸) is a semigroup homomorphism. This is listed as an assumption rather than a theorem; if no such coherent family exists, the inner implementation of the CP action fails and the extended hypersurface algebra is undefined.
  3. §5.2, Eqs. (131)–(132): The gluing of the two expansion charges is realized by a G•-compatible central extension K_○ whose existence and uniqueness are left open (“it remains an important question whether this central extension is the unique consistent form”). The strongest claim—that A_□• is the on-shell algebra of the double-null subregion—therefore rests on an unproven algebraic structure whose physical content is only heuristically motivated by shock-wave and parallel-transport considerations.
minor comments (4)
  1. Notation for the two hypersurface algebras (A_□• versus A_□•, left versus right) is hard to parse in print; a more distinctive subscript or a table of symbols would help.
  2. §6.3 discusses algebraic type but leaves the question entirely open; a short remark on what would be needed for a type-II conclusion (or why it is currently out of reach) would strengthen the discussion.
  3. Several self-citations supply essential background (extended phase space, null Raychaudhuri); a brief self-contained summary of the needed formulae would improve readability for non-specialists.
  4. Typos: “Hájíček” is occasionally misspelled; “semigroup” versus “semi-group” is inconsistent; Figure 7 caption repeats “π_○” without defining the dressing map in the caption itself.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the on-shell algebra is assembled from classical CIVP data via standard (if technical) operator-algebra constructions; self-citations supply background geometry and measures but do not force the final claim by definition or fit.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: classical CIVP data and corner symmetry semigroup (Sec. 2) o kinematical Weyl/group/semigroup algebras with automorphic vs CP actions (Sec. 3) o Stinespring dilation of CP supertranslations to a semigroup crossed product, then ordinary crossed product by G• to impose Raychaudhuri/Damour as operator equations (Sec. 4) o diagonal quotient on pure-corner data plus bi-crossed-product gluing of the two expansions (Sec. 5). Each step is an explicit algebraic construction (Weyl CCR, Wiener–Hopf isometries, Longo dilation, Takesaki-style crossed product, Zappa–Szép product). The final object A_□• is defined to be the algebra of operators that satisfy the quantum constraints and the CIVP gluing; it is therefore a candidate by construction of the method, not a prediction that reduces to a fitted parameter or to a prior theorem that already contained the target. Self-citations ([35,41,76,79,82,84,116] etc.) supply the classical phase space, corner charges, and existence of a quasi-invariant measure on pure superboosts; they are not used as uniqueness theorems that forbid alternatives, nor do they smuggle an ansatz that already encodes the double-null algebra. The speculative central-extension gluing (5.2) is explicitly labelled non-unique. Hence the paper is self-contained against its own inputs; residual issues (existence of full quasi-invariant measures, type classification) are rigor/correctness questions, not circular reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 3 invented entities

The construction rests on the classical CIVP theorem, the existence of quasi-invariant measures on infinite-dimensional diffeomorphism and function groups, the applicability of a generalized Stinespring theorem that yields a homomorphism of endomorphisms, and a choice of central-extension form for the expansion commutator. No numerical free parameters are fitted; the invented entities are the concrete algebras and the gluing product themselves.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Classical CIVP theorem: sufficiently regular characteristic data determine a unique local vacuum spacetime development up to gauge prior to caustics (Thm. 2.1).
    Taken as given from the mathematical GR literature; the quantum construction inherits its domain of validity.
  • domain assumption Quasi-invariant measures exist on Diff(C) ⋉ C^∞(C)_B and on C^∞(C)_T (and its positive semigroup) so that L^{2} spaces and group/semigroup algebras can be defined.
    Invoked in §3.2; existence is cited for compact manifolds and for superboosts, but not constructed for the full product group used here.
  • ad hoc to paper A family of Stinespring dilation pairs can be chosen so that the dilated maps form a semigroup homomorphism of endomorphisms.
    Assumed after Longo’s theorem (§4.1) in order to obtain a semigroup crossed product; not automatic for every CP action.
  • domain assumption Linear Weyl quantization of the tangent space at a background point adequately captures the leading-order quantum algebra of the null hypersurface phase space.
    Explicitly adopted as a perturbative approximation (§3.1); full deformation quantization is left open.
  • ad hoc to paper The commutator of the two expansion charges is a G•-compatible central extension determined by the gluing data ○.
    Proposed in §5.2 as a natural but non-unique choice that makes the bi-crossed product a Lie algebra; uniqueness is left open.
invented entities (3)
  • Semigroup crossed product A_□ = A_⧸ ×_α□ G⁺_□ implementing supertranslations via dilated endomorphisms no independent evidence
    purpose: To include non-automorphic supertranslations inside a single C*-algebra while preserving the semigroup structure.
    Constructed in §4.1 from Stinespring + semigroup crossed-product theory; no independent experimental handle.
  • On-shell single-hypersurface algebra A_□• obtained by further crossed product with G• no independent evidence
    purpose: To impose Raychaudhuri and Damour constraints as operator equations.
    Defined in §4.2; standard crossed-product constraint quantization applied to the extended null algebra.
  • Glued CIVP algebra A_□• = (π(A_□•) ⊗_○ π(A_□•))/∼• with bi-crossed product of the two supertranslation semigroups no independent evidence
    purpose: To enforce corner matching of area/Hájiček data and a non-trivial relation between the two expansions.
    Central new object of §5; the concrete bi-crossed product and central-extension commutator are postulated rather than derived from a uniqueness theorem.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 47615 in / 3424 out tokens · 39832 ms · 2026-07-10T18:05:44.353288+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The initial value problem for general relativity on spacelike hypersurfaces is famously captured by the ADM formalism. Less well known is the Cauchy problem for general relativity on null hypersurfaces, which goes under the name of the Characteristic Initial Value Problem (CIVP). The CIVP is formulated on a pair of intersecting null hypersurfaces, encoding rich physics in the interplay between their respective initial data, and especially the gluing of these hypersurfaces at their shared codimension-two corner. In this work, we construct an operator-algebraic quantization of the CIVP. To do so, we first quantize each null hypersurface separately, using the corner symmetries as a guiding principle, and then glue them together at the joint initial cut. The resulting algebra admits an inner action of the full corner symmetry (semi)group consisting of superboosts, superrotations, and supertranslations. These are associated, respectively, with the quantization of the area, the H\'aji\v{c}ek one-form, and the expansion along both null directions. Supertranslations do not act as algebra preserving maps, but instead are quantized to quantum channels and included into the algebra via a generalized form of the Stinespring dilation theorem. The inclusion of superboosts and superrotations implements the gravitational constraints arising from Einstein's equations at the level of the quantum algebra. By virtue of the CIVP, in its local caustic-free domain of validity, our construction yields a candidate for the on-shell algebra of a gravitational subregion subtended by a pair of null hypersurfaces.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07785 by Luca Ciambelli, Marc S. Klinger.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pictorial representation of the CIVP. The indicated data determine the spacetime metric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A convenient way to organize the data of the CIVP. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The classical data of a single hypersurface exhibit a nesting structure in which each piece [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quantum data of a single hypersurface. We next form an extended algebra A □ by combining together the algebras A⧸ and A□ through the action α □. The resulting algebra resembles a crossed product, but is subtly different since α □ is a non-automorphic action. Technically, the tool that makes this amalgamation possible is a general￾ized form of Stinespring’s dilation theorem [80] which allows for the quantum… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Constraint quantization of a single hypersurface. Here, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The CIVP algebra prior to gluing. We address these two features by gluing together the hypersurface algebras as A □• =  A □• ⊗⃝ A □•  / ∼•, (6) where ∼• is an equivalence relation. This equivalence relation can be seen to implement two quo￾tients. It enforces at the corner Ω(u) ∼• Ω(v) , π (u) a ∼• π (v) a , (7) so that we have only one set of pure corner degrees of freedom in the full CIVP algebra. At t… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Operator algebra of the CIVP. As we heuristically derived in this Introduction, the operator algebra A □• is obtained by gluing the quantum data of two null hypersurfaces. Each hypersurface carries various pieces appropriately joined together. We recollect them in the table below. Classical data Symmetry/charge Quantum object Role Data on N Radiative/shear data A⧸ Kinematical null algebra Ω, πa Superboosts… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Pictorial representation of the CIVP. The indicated data determine the spacetime metric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: A convenient way to organize the data of the CIVP. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: CIVP as quotient. The mathematical structure described in figure 10 will be our guidepost for the remainder of the manuscript. For the rest of this section, it will allow us to identify the classical features associated with the different parts of the data i. Then, it will instruct us on how to quantize the full CIVP by first quantizing the separate pieces kinematically, and subsequently putting them back… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A positive supertranslation moves the initial cut [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The classical data of a single hypersurface exhibit a nesting structure in which each piece [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Quantum data of a single hypersurface. We have therefore arrived at the perturbative kinematical quantization of any single hypersurface theory appearing in the CIVP. Of course, this implies a quantization of the full set of kinematical data in the CIVP by doubling. Although not necessary, it can be helpful to interpret the operators appearing in the algebras A⧸, A•, and A□ more directly in terms of the C… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Constraint quantization of a single hypersurface. The hierarchy of actions is translated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The CIVP algebra prior to gluing. 5.1 The Glued Algebra The algebra A □• is formed by following the same sequence of steps as was described in Sec. 4.1-4.2, only applied to the kinematical variables of the left hypersurface. Consequently, the algebras A □• and A □• will be isomorphic. To prepare these algebras for gluing, it is useful to represent them simultaneously on a single common Hilbert space. A na… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Operator algebra of the CIVP. To construct this algebra, we first constructed the classical gravitational phase space on null hypersurfaces, and formulated the CIVP. Emphasis was put on the universal symmetry structure, and in particular the supertranslations semi-group. This classical part also allowed us to set up the useful symbolic notation ⧸, □, and •, associated with degrees of freedom in the bulk o… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 135 canonical work pages · 88 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Dynamics of General Relativity

    R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, “The Dynamics of general relativity,”Gen. Rel. Grav.40(2008) 1997–2027,arXiv:gr-qc/0405109

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  2. [2]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1973

    work page 1973

  3. [3]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Quantum theory of gravity. i. the canonical theory,

    B. S. DeWitt, “Quantum theory of gravity. i. the canonical theory,”Physical Review160 (1967) no. 5, 1113

    work page 1967

  5. [5]

    Canonical Quantum Gravity and the Problem of Time

    C. J. Isham, “Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time,”NATO Sci. Ser. C409 (1993) 157–287,arXiv:gr-qc/9210011

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  6. [6]

    Time and interpretations of quantum gravity,

    K. V. Kuchar, “Time and interpretations of quantum gravity,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D20 (2011) 3–86

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    The Theory of gravitation in Hamiltonian form,

    P. A. M. Dirac, “The Theory of gravitation in Hamiltonian form,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 246(1958) 333–343

    work page 1958

  8. [8]

    Gravitational Observables and Local Symmetries

    C. G. Torre, “Gravitational observables and local symmetries,”Phys. Rev. D48(1993) R2373–R2376,arXiv:gr-qc/9306030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  9. [9]

    On the Characteristic Initial Value Problem in Gravitational Theory,

    R. K. Sachs, “On the Characteristic Initial Value Problem in Gravitational Theory,”J. Math. Phys.3(1962) no. 5, 908–914

    work page 1962

  10. [10]

    On the Regular and Asymptotic Characteristic Initial Value Problem for Einstein’s Vacuum Field Equations,

    H. Friedrich, “On the Regular and Asymptotic Characteristic Initial Value Problem for Einstein’s Vacuum Field Equations,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A375(1981) 169–184

    work page 1981

  11. [11]

    Reduction of the characteristic initial value problem to the cauchy problem and its applications to the einstein equations,

    A. D. Rendall, “Reduction of the characteristic initial value problem to the cauchy problem and its applications to the einstein equations,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences427(1990) no. 1872, 221–239

    work page 1990

  12. [12]

    The general solution to the einstein equations on a null surface,

    S. A. Hayward, “The general solution to the einstein equations on a null surface,”Classical and Quantum Gravity10(1993) no. 4, 773

    work page 1993

  13. [13]

    Covariant double-null dynamics: 2 + 2-splitting of the Einstein equations,

    P. R. Brady, S. Droz, W. Israel, and S. M. Morsink, “Covariant double-null dynamics: 2 + 2-splitting of the Einstein equations,”Classical and Quantum Gravity13(1996) no. 8, 2211

    work page 1996

  14. [14]

    The Cauchy problem on a characteristic cone for the Einstein equations in arbitrary dimensions

    Y. Choquet-Bruhat, P. T. Chrusciel, and J. M. Martin-Garcia, “The Cauchy problem on a characteristic cone for the Einstein equations in arbitrary dimensions,”Annales Henri Poincare12(2011) 419–482,arXiv:1006.4467 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  15. [15]

    The Poisson bracket on free null initial data for gravity

    M. P. Reisenberger, “The Poisson bracket on free null initial data for gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 211101,arXiv:0712.2541 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  16. [16]

    The Poisson brackets of free null initial data for vacuum general relativity

    M. P. Reisenberger, “The Poisson brackets of free null initial data for vacuum general relativity,”Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) no. 18, 185012,arXiv:1804.10284 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    Double Null Data and the Characteristic Problem in General Relativity

    M. Mars and G. Sánchez-Pérez, “Double null data and the characteristic problem in general relativity,”J. Phys. A56(2023) no. 3, 035203,arXiv:2205.15267 [gr-qc]. 48

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Covariant definition of Double Null Data and geometric uniqueness of the characteristic initial value problem

    M. Mars and G. Sánchez-Pérez, “Covariant definition of double null data and geometric uniqueness of the characteristic initial value problem,”J. Phys. A56(2023) no. 25, 255203, arXiv:2301.02722 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Horizon phase spaces in general relativity

    V. Chandrasekaran and E. E. Flanagan, “The gravitational phase space of horizons in general relativity,”arXiv:2309.03871 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    A 3+1 perspective on null hypersurfaces and isolated horizons

    E. Gourgoulhon and J. L. Jaramillo, “A 3+1 perspective on null hypersurfaces and isolated horizons,”Phys. Rept.423(2006) 159–294,arXiv:gr-qc/0503113

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  21. [21]

    Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincaré,

    J.-M. Lévy-Leblond, “Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincaré,”A. Inst. Henri Poincaré III 1(1965)

    work page 1965

  22. [22]

    On an analogue of the Galilei group,

    N. D. Sen Gupta, “On an analogue of the Galilei group,”Nuovo Cim. A44(1966) no. 2, 512–517

    work page 1966

  23. [23]

    Geometry of zero signature spacetime,

    M. Henneaux, “Geometry of zero signature spacetime,”Bull.Soc.Math.Belg. 31 47-63(1979)

    work page 1979

  24. [24]

    Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry

    C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, and P. A. Horvathy, “Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry,”Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 092001,arXiv:1402.5894 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    Foundations of Carrollian Geometry

    L. Ciambelli and P. Jai-akson, “Foundations of Carrollian Geometry,”arXiv:2510.21651 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Null Surface Geometrodynamics,

    C. G. Torre, “Null Surface Geometrodynamics,”Class. Quant. Grav.3(1986) 773

    work page 1986

  27. [27]

    Gravity Degrees of Freedom on a Null Surface

    F. Hopfmüller and L. Freidel, “Gravity Degrees of Freedom on a Null Surface,”Phys. Rev. D 95(2017) no. 10, 104006,arXiv:1611.03096 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    Generating functional for gravitational null initial data

    W. Wieland, “Generating functional for gravitational null initial data,”Class. Quant. Grav. 36(2019) no. 23, 235007,arXiv:1905.06357 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    The symplectic 2-form and Poisson bracket of null canonical gravity

    M. P. Reisenberger, “The Symplectic 2-form and Poisson bracket of null canonical gravity,” arXiv:gr-qc/0703134

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    The symplectic 2-form for gravity in terms of free null initial data

    M. P. Reisenberger, “The symplectic 2-form for gravity in terms of free null initial data,” Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 155022,arXiv:1211.3880 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  31. [31]

    A Boundary Term for the Gravitational Action with Null Boundaries

    K. Parattu, S. Chakraborty, B. R. Majhi, and T. Padmanabhan, “A Boundary Term for the Gravitational Action with Null Boundaries,”Gen. Rel. Grav.48(2016) no. 7, 94, arXiv:1501.01053 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    Gravitational action with null boundaries

    L. Lehner, R. C. Myers, E. Poisson, and R. D. Sorkin, “Gravitational action with null boundaries,”Phys. Rev. D94(2016) no. 8, 084046,arXiv:1609.00207 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Symmetries and charges of general relativity at null boundaries

    V. Chandrasekaran, E. E. Flanagan, and K. Prabhu, “Symmetries and charges of general relativity at null boundaries,”JHEP11(2018) 125,arXiv:1807.11499 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Null boundary phase space: slicings, news and memory

    H. Adami, D. Grumiller, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, V. Taghiloo, H. Yavartanoo, and C. Zwikel, “Null boundary phase space: slicings, news & memory,”JHEP11(2021) 155, arXiv:2110.04218 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Null Raychaudhuri: Canonical Structure and the Dressing Time

    L. Ciambelli, L. Freidel, and R. G. Leigh, “Null Raychaudhuri: Canonical Structure and the Dressing Time,”arXiv:2309.03932 [hep-th]. 49

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    General gravitational charges on null hypersurfaces

    G. Odak, A. Rignon-Bret, and S. Speziale, “General gravitational charges on null hypersurfaces,”arXiv:2309.03854 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Integrable structures and the quantization of free null initial data for gravity

    A. Fuchs and M. P. Reisenberger, “Integrable structures and the quantization of free null initial data for gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) no. 18, 185003,arXiv:1704.06992 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Gravitational $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ Algebra on the Light Cone

    W. Wieland, “Gravitational SL(2,R) algebra on the light cone,”JHEP07(2021) 057, arXiv:2104.05803 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Quantum geometry of the null cone

    W. Wieland, “Quantum geometry of the null cone,”Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no. 4, 044042, arXiv:2401.17491 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Quantum-Gravitational Null Raychaudhuri Equation

    S.-E. Bak, M. Parikh, S. Sarkar, and F. Setti, “Quantum-gravitational null Raychaudhuri equation,”JHEP07(2024) 214,arXiv:2312.17214 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Quantum Null Geometry and Gravity

    L. Ciambelli, L. Freidel, and R. G. Leigh, “Quantum null geometry and gravity,”JHEP12 (2024) 028,arXiv:2407.11132 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Quantum Geometry of the Light Cone: Fock representation and Spectrum of Radiated Power

    W. Wieland, “Quantum geometry of the light cone: Fock representation and spectrum of radiated power,”Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025) no. 19, 195006,arXiv:2504.10802 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Quantum Area Fluctuations from Gravitational Phase Space

    L. Ciambelli, T. He, and K. M. Zurek, “Quantum area fluctuations from gravitational phase space,”JHEP08(2025) 199,arXiv:2504.12282 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Quantum Geometry from Area Fluctuations

    J. Kowalski-Glikman and L. Varrin, “Quantum Geometry from Area Fluctuations,” arXiv:2606.06372 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Invariant Variation Problems

    E. Noether, “Invariant Variation Problems,”Gott. Nachr.1918(1918) 235–257, arXiv:physics/0503066

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1918

  46. [46]

    Role of Surface Integrals in the Hamiltonian Formulation of General Relativity,

    T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, “Role of Surface Integrals in the Hamiltonian Formulation of General Relativity,”Annals Phys.88(1974) 286

    work page 1974

  47. [47]

    A General Definition of "Conserved Quantities" in General Relativity and Other Theories of Gravity

    R. M. Wald and A. Zoupas, “A General definition of ’conserved quantities’ in general relativity and other theories of gravity,”Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 084027, arXiv:gr-qc/9911095

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  48. [48]

    Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges

    G. Barnich and F. Brandt, “Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges,”Nucl. Phys. B633(2002) 3–82,arXiv:hep-th/0111246

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  49. [49]

    Supertranslations and Superrotations at the Black Hole Horizon

    L. Donnay, G. Giribet, H. A. Gonzalez, and M. Pino, “Supertranslations and Superrotations at the Black Hole Horizon,”Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) no. 9, 091101,arXiv:1511.08687 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    Extended Symmetries at the Black Hole Horizon

    L. Donnay, G. Giribet, H. A. González, and M. Pino, “Extended Symmetries at the Black Hole Horizon,”JHEP09(2016) 100,arXiv:1607.05703 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    Near-horizon Carroll symmetry and black hole Love numbers

    R. F. Penna, “Near-horizon Carroll symmetry and black hole Love numbers,” arXiv:1812.05643 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Carrollian Physics at the Black Hole Horizon

    L. Donnay and C. Marteau, “Carrollian Physics at the Black Hole Horizon,”Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) no. 16, 165002,arXiv:1903.09654 [hep-th]. 50

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Carroll Structures, Null Geometry and Conformal Isometries

    L. Ciambelli, R. G. Leigh, C. Marteau, and P. M. Petropoulos, “Carroll Structures, Null Geometry and Conformal Isometries,”Phys. Rev. D100(2019) no. 4, 046010, arXiv:1905.02221 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Gravitational waves in general relativity, vii. waves from axi-symmetric isolated system,

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. Van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner, “Gravitational waves in general relativity, vii. waves from axi-symmetric isolated system,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences269(1962) no. 1336, 21–52

    work page 1962

  55. [55]

    Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory,

    R. Sachs, “Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory,”Phys. Rev.128(1962) no. 6, 2851–2864

    work page 1962

  56. [56]

    Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,

    R. Sachs, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A270(1962) 103–126

    work page 1962

  57. [57]

    Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, “Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence,”JHEP05(2010) 062,arXiv:1001.1541 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity

    W. Donnelly and L. Freidel, “Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity,”JHEP09 (2016) 102,arXiv:1601.04744 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    Local phase space and edge modes for diffeomorphism-invariant theories

    A. J. Speranza, “Local phase space and edge modes for diffeomorphism-invariant theories,” JHEP02(2018) 021,arXiv:1706.05061 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    Edge modes of gravity -- I: Corner potentials and charges

    L. Freidel, M. Geiller, and D. Pranzetti, “Edge modes of gravity. Part I. Corner potentials and charges,”JHEP11(2020) 026,arXiv:2006.12527 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    Extended corner symmetry, charge bracket and Einstein's equations

    L. Freidel, R. Oliveri, D. Pranzetti, and S. Speziale, “Extended corner symmetry, charge bracket and Einstein’s equations,”JHEP09(2021) 083,arXiv:2104.12881 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    A canonical bracket for open gravitational system

    L. Freidel, “A canonical bracket for open gravitational system,”arXiv:2111.14747 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    Physical Representations of Corner Symmetries

    L. Varrin, “Physical representations of corner symmetries,”Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no. 8, 086003,arXiv:2409.10624 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Semi-Classical Limit of Quantum Gravity on Corners

    L. Varrin, “Semiclassical limit of quantum gravity on corners,”Phys. Rev. D113(2026) no. 12, 126015,arXiv:2510.25843 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Entanglement Entropy of Quantum Corners

    L. Ciambelli, J. Kowalski-Glikman, and L. Varrin, “Entanglement entropy of quantum corners,”JHEP02(2026) 188,arXiv:2507.16800 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    Orbit method for Quantum Corner Symmetries

    G. Neri and L. Varrin, “Orbit method for quantum corner symmetries,”Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) no. 10, 104010,arXiv:2507.10683 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    From Asymptotic Symmetries to the Corner Proposal

    L. Ciambelli, “From Asymptotic Symmetries to the Corner Proposal,”PoSModave2022 (2023) 002,arXiv:2212.13644 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    The Problem of Time and its Quantum Resolution

    M. S. Klinger and R. G. Leigh, “The problem of time and its quantum resolution,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D34(2025) no. 16, 2544022,arXiv:2504.00152 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Emergent times in holographic duality

    S. A. W. Leutheusser and H. Liu, “Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,”Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) no. 8, 086020,arXiv:2112.12156 [hep-th]. 51

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Gravity and the Crossed Product

    E. Witten, “Gravity and the crossed product,”JHEP10(2022) 008,arXiv:2112.12828 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    Large N algebras and generalized entropy

    V. Chandrasekaran, G. Penington, and E. Witten, “Large N algebras and generalized entropy,”JHEP04(2023) 009,arXiv:2209.10454 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    Large $N$ von Neumann algebras and the renormalization of Newton's constant

    E. Gesteau, “Large N von Neumann Algebras and the Renormalization of Newton’s Constant,”Commun. Math. Phys.406(2025) no. 2, 40,arXiv:2302.01938 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    An Algebra of Observables for de Sitter Space

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten, “An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,”JHEP02(2023) 082,arXiv:2206.10780 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    Generalized Black Hole Entropy is von Neumann Entropy

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, and G. Satishchandran, “Generalized black hole entropy is von Neumann entropy,”Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no. 2, 025013,arXiv:2309.15897 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Gravitational algebras and the generalized second law

    T. Faulkner and A. J. Speranza, “Gravitational algebras and the generalized second law,” JHEP11(2024) 099,arXiv:2405.00847 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Generalized Entropy is von Neumann Entropy II: The complete symmetry group and edge modes,

    M. S. Klinger, J. Kudler-Flam, and G. Satishchandran, “Generalized Entropy is von Neumann Entropy II: The complete symmetry group and edge modes,”arXiv:2601.07910 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  77. [77]

    Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity

    K. Jensen, J. Sorce, and A. J. Speranza, “Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity,”JHEP12(2023) 020,arXiv:2306.01837 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    Crossed product algebras and generalized entropy for subregions

    S. Ali Ahmad and R. Jefferson, “Crossed product algebras and generalized entropy for subregions,”SciPost Phys. Core7(2024) 020,arXiv:2306.07323 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    A Theory of Backgrounds and Background Independence,

    M. Klinger, “A Theory of Backgrounds and Background Independence,”arXiv:2512.05043 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    On Landauer's principle and bound for infinite systems

    R. Longo, “On Landauer’s Principle and Bound for Infinite Systems,”Commun. Math. Phys. 363(2018) no. 2, 531–560,arXiv:1710.00910 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.