Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Causality and passivity bound how steeply a compact object’s tidal response can change with frequency.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 00:00 UTC pith:6XAQ6BGI

load-bearing objection Clean Schwarz–Pick bound on dynamical tides: solid and useful for neutron stars, honestly conditional for black holes. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.26686 v1 pith:6XAQ6BGI submitted 2026-07-29 gr-qc hep-phhep-th

A Bound on the Dynamical Love Number

Alex Kehagias , Antonio Riotto This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-phhep-th
keywords tidal Love numbersdynamical tidesSchwarz-Pick theoremHerglotz functionsneutron starsblack holespassivitydispersion relations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the frequency-dependent tidal deformability of neutron stars and black holes is not free: once causality, reality, and energy absorption are imposed, the response can be rescaled into a holomorphic self-map of the upper half-plane. The classical Schwarz–Pick theorem then forces that map to contract hyperbolic distance, which collapses to a simple bound on the logarithmic slope of the Euclidean Love number. For a neutron star the bound becomes a sharp upper limit on the dynamical Love number in terms of the static one and the lowest tidally coupled mode frequency, and the ideal single f-mode model saturates it. For a black hole the same geometry constrains dynamical corrections once the leading dissipative tidal-heating coefficient is fixed. A sympathetic reader cares because the result turns structural assumptions already used in waveform modeling into a testable ceiling on how large dynamical tides can be.

Core claim

Under causality, reality, passivity, and the high-frequency conditions that yield a positive-measure dispersion representation, the rescaled Euclidean tidal response is an axis-preserving Herglotz function. Schwarz–Pick then implies that its logarithmic slope with respect to logarithmic frequency cannot exceed one in magnitude. For neutron stars this yields the moment bound that the dynamical Love number is at most the spectral part of the static Love number divided by the square of the lowest frequency carrying tidal weight, saturated by a single-mode response; for black holes the same contraction constrains the full Euclidean representative built from the tidal-heating coefficient.

What carries the argument

The Schwarz–Pick contraction applied to a Herglotz representative of the retarded tidal Green’s function—Φ = ν λ_E when the static Love number is nonzero, and Ψ = −λ_E/ν when it vanishes. Holomorphic self-maps of the upper half-plane cannot stretch hyperbolic distance, so along the imaginary axis the logarithmic derivative of Φ (or Ψ) is forced to lie between −1 and +1.

Load-bearing premise

The complete matched physical response, after all subtractions, must decay at high frequency so that a one-subtraction positive spectral measure exists and the rescaled function truly maps the upper half-plane into itself.

What would settle it

Compute the full Euclidean tidal response of a realistic neutron-star model whose lowest tidally coupled frequency is known, extract λ₂ and λ₀, and check whether λ₂ exceeds (λ₀ − λ_∞)/ω_gap² or whether |d ln(ν λ_E)/d ln ν| ever exceeds 1 inside the controlled domain.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Dynamical Love numbers of neutron stars are nonnegative and cannot exceed the spectral part of the static Love number divided by the square of the lowest tidally coupled frequency.
  • The ideal single f-mode response saturates the stellar moment bound, which explains why that model lies so close to numerical stellar calculations.
  • If a positive spectral threshold is known together with one Euclidean value of the response, the dynamical Love number is confined to a finite two-sided interval that shrinks at low frequency.
  • Black-hole tidal heating is nonnegative, and once a global Herglotz representative is established the full Euclidean response must obey the same logarithmic-slope bound.
  • Scheme-dependent low-frequency coefficients for black holes are not bounded in isolation; only the complete matched susceptibility is constrained.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Simultaneous gravitational-wave measurements of static deformability and f-mode frequency could test how close real neutron stars sit to the single-mode ceiling.
  • The same contraction applies channel-by-channel, so rotating or stratified stars with lower-frequency g-modes or inertial modes would face a tighter numerical ceiling once those modes carry tidal weight.
  • A verified Herglotz completion of the matched black-hole response would convert the present low-frequency consistency checks into a genuine bound on horizon absorption and its dynamical corrections.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper argues that causality, reality, passivity, and high-frequency conditions sufficient for a positive-measure dispersion representation allow the retarded tidal response χ(ω) to be rescaled into an axis-preserving Herglotz function of complex frequency. Schwarz–Pick contraction along the Euclidean axis then yields the master inequality |d ln Φ/d ln ν| ≤ 1 (Eqs. 1.1, 3.2), with Φ = ν λ_E for bodies with nonzero static Love number and Ψ = −λ_E/ν when λ_0 = 0. For neutron stars this implies the sign λ_2 ≥ 0, the sharp spectral moment bound λ_2 ≤ (λ_0 − λ_∞)/ω_gap² (Eq. 4.3) saturated by the single f-mode model, and the two-sided finite-frequency bracket (4.7). For four-dimensional asymptotically flat black holes the same logic constrains the Euclidean representative built from the tidal-heating coefficient η, subject to the complete matched response being Herglotz; the authors also show that the known scheme-independent skeleton is not itself Herglotz (Sec. 5.2).

Significance. The central geometric idea—that the same Schwarz–Pick rigidity underlying the Maldacena–Shenker–Stanford chaos bound constrains tidal response—is clean and well motivated. For neutron stars the moment bound (4.3) and the two-sided interval (4.7) are sharp, saturated by a standard single-mode model, and already consistent with existing Newtonian mode sums and relativistic EFT matchings cited in Sec. 4.1 (including the diagnostic ω_* = √(λ_0/λ_2)). Those results are falsifiable against GW asteroseismology and waveform phasing and do not rely on free fit parameters once the spectral threshold is given. The black-hole application is more provisional but usefully frames what a completed matched response would have to satisfy and correctly isolates the obstruction in the closed-form skeleton. Overall the manuscript is a solid contribution to the analytic structure of tidal deformability.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2] Sec. 2, Eqs. (2.15)–(2.17) and the paragraph preceding them: the identification of F(ω)=ωχ(ω) (stars) or G(ω)=χ(ω)/ω (black holes) as a global Herglotz function rests on the assumption that the complete matched susceptibility admits a one-subtraction positive-measure representation with λ_∞ ≥ 0. The paper states this rather than deriving it from microphysics. For neutron stars the moment bound (4.3) itself follows from support of dμ once the representation is granted, so the assumption is load-bearing for both the differential Schwarz–Pick inequality and the Herglotz packaging. A short discussion of when realistic EOS, damping, or gapless channels would force further subtractions or λ_∞ < 0 (and thereby invalidate Im F ≥ 0 in H) would make the scope of Eqs. (4.3) and (4.7) clearer without changing the formal derivation.
  2. [Section 5.2] Sec. 5.2 and the conclusions: the authors prove that the scheme-independent closed-form skeleton of Ref. [43] grows super-linearly along open non-tangential rays and therefore cannot be a global Herglotz representative. Consequently the black-hole statements (5.3)–(5.4) and the conditional coefficient estimates (5.10) apply only to a still-unconstructed complete matched response. The manuscript already notes this, but the abstract and the opening of Sec. 5 still present the black-hole bound on roughly equal footing with the neutron-star result. The BH claims should be more explicitly labelled as conditional on a future verification of the Herglotz property for the fully matched susceptibility, so that the unconditional NS results are not diluted.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1] Table 1 is a helpful summary of the logical chain; consider adding an explicit row for the finite-domain bound (3.7) so that readers who only skim the table see that the global |d ln Φ/d ln ν| ≤ 1 is the Λ → ∞ limit.
  2. [Figure 1] Fig. 1 (left): the caption states that the single f-mode curve “approaches the two local Schwarz–Pick boundaries only asymptotically.” A brief note in the caption that equality in Schwarz–Pick holds only for automorphisms (Möbius maps) would prevent readers from expecting exact saturation of |slope| = 1 at finite ν.
  3. [Section 5] Eq. (5.9): ν_0 = 2πT = 1/(2 r_s) for Schwarzschild is correct, but a parenthetical reminder that the same identification is only a convenient reference scale (not a derived radius of convergence) would align the text with the caution already present later in Sec. 5.
  4. [References] References: several arXiv identifiers in the bibliography carry future-looking year stamps (e.g. 2604.*, 2605.*, 2606.*). Confirm that the final citation list uses the versions intended for publication and that any still-unpublished works are marked as such.
  5. Minor typographical inconsistencies: “D´ epartement” / “Gen` eve” in the affiliations, and occasional switches between “Schwarz–Pick” and “Schwarz-Pick.” Standardize.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the bound follows from stated axioms plus Schwarz–Pick, not from fitted inputs or self-definition.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: causality/reality/passivity plus one-subtraction high-frequency control imply a positive-measure dispersion representation (Sec. 2); a stated rescaling then makes F=ωχ (stars) or G=χ/ω (BHs) Herglotz when λ_∞≥0; Schwarz–Pick on the Euclidean axis yields |d ln Φ/d ln ν|≤1 (Eqs. 3.1–3.2); the NS moment bound λ₂≤(λ₀−λ_∞)/ω_gap² (Eq. 4.3) is the elementary support inequality on that measure and is saturated by the explicit single-mode model (Eq. 4.5) by direct evaluation, not by definition. None of these steps equates the claim to its input, fits a parameter and renames it a prediction, or rests on a load-bearing uniqueness theorem from the authors. Self-citations (chaos bound, photon rings) are motivational analogies only. Literature comparisons (ω_*, η, f-mode) use independent external calculations. The paper’s own caveat that the BH scheme-independent skeleton is not globally Herglotz (Sec. 5.2) is an honesty about scope, not a circular reduction. Score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on four physical inputs (causality, reality, passivity, high-frequency one-subtraction control with λ_∞≥0) plus the classical Schwarz–Pick theorem. No parameters are fitted to data. The only fragile, paper-specific load is the assumption that the complete matched BH response (not merely the scheme-independent skeleton) is Herglotz after rescaling—an assumption the authors show fails for the known closed form and leave open.

axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Causality: retarded Green’s function vanishes for τ<0, so χ is holomorphic in the upper half-plane H.
    Standard linear-response input; Sec. 2, Table 1.
  • domain assumption Reality: G_R real implies χ(−ω̄)=χ(ω) and λ_E(ν)=χ(iν) real for ν>0.
    Standard; Sec. 2, Eq. (2.6).
  • domain assumption Passivity: ω Im χ(ω) ≥ 0 on the real axis (second law / area theorem), yielding nonnegative spectral measure dμ.
    Physical input common to stars and horizons; Eqs. (2.8), (2.12).
  • domain assumption High-frequency control: χ(z)−λ_∞ decays fast enough for a one-subtraction Kramers–Kronig representation, and λ_∞ ≥ 0, so F(z)=zχ(z) (or G=χ/z) is Herglotz.
    Stated as an assumption in Sec. 2 (Eqs. 2.11–2.17); not derived for every system. Load-bearing for applying Schwarz–Pick.
  • standard math Schwarz–Pick theorem: holomorphic self-maps of H are contractions of the hyperbolic metric, hence |d ln Φ / d ln ν| ≤ 1 along the imaginary axis.
    Classical complex analysis; Sec. 3 and App. A.
  • domain assumption For the finite NS moment bound: the tidal spectral measure has a strictly positive lower endpoint ω_gap > 0.
    Needed for Eq. (4.3); may fail for gapless or dissipative channels (acknowledged in Sec. 4).
  • ad hoc to paper For black holes: the complete matched representative G(ω)=χ(ω)/ω is Herglotz (not merely boundary-passive).
    Assumed in Sec. 5; Sec. 5.2 proves the known scheme-independent skeleton is not globally Herglotz. Bound on exact BH response is therefore conditional.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 23505 in / 3524 out tokens · 67588 ms · 2026-07-31T00:00:09.963339+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The tidal deformability of a compact object is encoded in a single function of frequency, the retarded Green's function relating the induced multipole to the applied tide. Causality, reality, passivity, and the high-frequency conditions required for a positive-measure dispersion representation allow this response to be rescaled into a holomorphic self-map of the upper complex frequency half-plane. Using the Schwarz--Pick theorem, already employed to derive the quantum chaos bound in black hole physics, we provide a bound on the rate of the tidal response with respect to the frequency. For a neutron star the dynamical Love number is bounded in terms of the static one and of the frequency of the first internal mode, with the single-mode ($f$-mode) model saturating the bound. For a black hole, the bound gives information on the dissipative tidal-heating coefficient.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 38 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Flanagan and T

    E.E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer,Constraining neutron star tidal Love numbers with gravitational wave detectors,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 021502 [0709.1915]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  2. [2]

    Hinderer,Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars,Astrophys

    T. Hinderer,Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars,Astrophys. J.677(2008) 1216 [0711.2420]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    Rodr ´ ıguez, L

    M.J. Rodr ´ ıguez, L. Santoni and A.R. Solomon,Love numbers of black holes and compact objects,2604.08653

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    Chakraborty and P

    S. Chakraborty and P. Pani,Tidal Response of Compact Objects,2604.08679

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    Donoghue,Monotone Matrix Functions and Analytic Continuation, vol

    W.F. Donoghue,Monotone Matrix Functions and Analytic Continuation, vol. 207 ofDie Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften in Einzeldarstellungen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York (1974)

    1974

  6. [6]

    Ahlfors,Conformal Invariants: Topics in Geometric Function Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York (1973)

    L.V. Ahlfors,Conformal Invariants: Topics in Geometric Function Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York (1973)

    1973

  7. [7]

    Maldacena, S.H

    J. Maldacena, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford,A bound on chaos,JHEP08(2016) 106 [1503.01409]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Giataganas, G.F

    D. Giataganas, G.F. Giudice, A. Kehagias, F. Quevedo and A. Riotto,Black Hole Photon Rings Saturate the Quantum Chaos Bound,2605.29923

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Gustafsson and D

    M. Gustafsson and D. Sj¨ oberg,Sum rules and physical bounds on passive metamaterials,New J. Phys.12(2010) 043046

    2010

  10. [10]

    Bernland, A

    A. Bernland, A. Luger and M. Gustafsson,Sum rules and constraints on passive systems,J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.44(2011) 145205

    2011

  11. [11]

    Cassier and G.W

    M. Cassier and G.W. Milton,Bounds on Herglotz functions and fundamental limits of broadband passive quasistatic cloaking,J. Math. Phys.58(2017) 071504

    2017

  12. [12]

    Goldberger and I.Z

    W.D. Goldberger and I.Z. Rothstein,An effective field theory of gravity for extended objects, Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 104029 [hep-th/0409156]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  13. [13]

    Kol and M

    B. Kol and M. Smolkin,Black hole stereotyping: induced gravito-static polarization,JHEP 02(2012) 010 [1110.3764]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [14]

    Goldberger and I.Z

    W.D. Goldberger and I.Z. Rothstein,Dissipative effects in the worldline approach to black hole dynamics,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 104030 [hep-th/0511133]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  15. [15]

    Damour and A

    T. Damour and A. Nagar,Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars,Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 084035 [0906.0096]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [16]

    Binnington and E

    T. Binnington and E. Poisson,Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers,Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 084018 [0906.1366]. – 22 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  17. [17]

    Nussenzveig,Causality and Dispersion Relations, Academic Press, New York (1972)

    H.M. Nussenzveig,Causality and Dispersion Relations, Academic Press, New York (1972)

    1972

  18. [18]

    Creminelli, A

    P. Creminelli, A. Longo, B. Salehian and A. Zahed,Analyticity and positivity of Green’s functions without Lorentz,JHEP06(2026) 135 [2512.10843]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    Akhiezer,The Classical Moment Problem and Some Related Questions in Analysis, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh (1965)

    N.I. Akhiezer,The Classical Moment Problem and Some Related Questions in Analysis, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh (1965)

    1965

  20. [20]

    Garnett,Bounded Analytic Functions, vol

    J.B. Garnett,Bounded Analytic Functions, vol. 236 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer (2007)

    2007

  21. [21]

    Andersson and K.D

    N. Andersson and K.D. Kokkotas,Towards gravitational wave asteroseismology,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.299(1998) 1059 [gr-qc/9711088]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  22. [22]

    Lai,Resonant oscillations and tidal heating in coalescing binary neutron stars,Mon

    D. Lai,Resonant oscillations and tidal heating in coalescing binary neutron stars,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.270(1994) 611 [astro-ph/9404062]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  23. [23]

    Steinhoff, T

    J. Steinhoff, T. Hinderer, A. Buonanno and A. Taracchini,Dynamical tides in general relativity: effective action and effective-one-body Hamiltonian,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 104028 [1608.01907]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Hinderer et al.,Effects of neutron-star dynamic tides on gravitational waveforms within the effective-one-body approach,Phys

    T. Hinderer et al.,Effects of neutron-star dynamic tides on gravitational waveforms within the effective-one-body approach,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 181101 [1602.00599]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Sarason,Sub-Hardy Hilbert Spaces in the Unit Disk, Wiley, New York (1994)

    D. Sarason,Sub-Hardy Hilbert Spaces in the Unit Disk, Wiley, New York (1994)

    1994

  26. [26]

    Kokkotas and G

    K.D. Kokkotas and G. Schaefer,Tidal and tidal resonant effects in coalescing binaries,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.275(1995) 301 [gr-qc/9502034]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  27. [27]

    Andersson and P

    N. Andersson and P. Pnigouras,The sum of Love: Exploring the effective tidal deformability of neutron stars,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 083001 [1906.08982]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Hegade K

    A. Hegade K. R., J.L. Ripley and N. Yunes,Dynamical tidal response of nonrotating relativistic stars,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 104064 [2403.03254]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Apostolidis, V

    T. Apostolidis, V. De Luca, L. Gualtieri, T. Katagiri, P. Pani and L. Santoni,Dynamical Tidal Response of Neutron Stars: from Effective Field Theory to Gravitational Waveforms, 2606.19446

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Hegade K

    A. Hegade K. R., K.J. Kwon, T. Venumadhav, H. Yu and N. Yunes,The Good, the Bad, and the Subtle: Relativistic mode sums for neutron-star tidal response,2605.08569

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni and A.R. Solomon,Static response and Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes,JCAP04(2021) 052 [2010.00593]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Le Tiec and M

    A. Le Tiec and M. Casals,Spinning black holes fall in love,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 131102 [2007.00214]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Charalambous, S

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky and M.M. Ivanov,On the vanishing of Love numbers for Kerr black holes,JHEP05(2021) 038 [2102.08917]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Kehagias and A

    A. Kehagias and A. Riotto,Black holes in a gravitational field: the non-linear static love number of Schwarzschild black holes vanishes,JCAP05(2025) 039 [2410.11014]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Combaluzier-Szteinsznaider, D

    O. Combaluzier-Szteinsznaider, D. Glazer, A. Joyce, M.J. Rodriguez and L. Santoni, Dynamical tidal response of Schwarzschild Black Holes,JHEP06(2026) 032 [2511.02372]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Gounis, A

    L.R. Gounis, A. Kehagias and A. Riotto,The vanishing of the non-linear static love number of Kerr black holes and the role of symmetries,JCAP03(2025) 002 [2412.08249]. – 23 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Charalambous, S

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky and M.M. Ivanov,Hidden symmetry of vanishing Love numbers,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 101101 [2103.01234]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni and A.R. Solomon,Ladder symmetries of black holes: implications for Love numbers and no-hair theorems,JCAP01(2022) 032 [2105.01069]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Charalambous, S

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky and M.M. Ivanov,Love symmetry,JHEP10(2022) 175 [2209.02091]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Chia,Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes,Phys

    H.S. Chia,Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes,Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 024013 [2010.07300]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Saketh, Z

    M.V.S. Saketh, Z. Zhou and M.M. Ivanov,Dynamical tidal response of Kerr black holes from scattering amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 064058 [2307.10391]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Ivanov and Z

    M.M. Ivanov and Z. Zhou,Revisiting the matching of black hole tidal responses: A systematic study of relativistic and logarithmic corrections,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 084030 [2208.08459]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Solon,Universal Closed Form for Dynamical Love Numbers of Black Holes, 2606.19281

    M.P. Solon,Universal Closed Form for Dynamical Love Numbers of Black Holes, 2606.19281

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Kosmopoulos, D

    D. Kosmopoulos, D. Perrone and M.P. Solon,Dynamical Love Numbers for Black Holes and Beyond from Shell Effective Field Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 211401 [2512.04002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Poisson,Absorption of mass and angular momentum by a black hole: Time-domain formalisms for gravitational perturbations, and the small-hole/slow-motion approximation, Phys

    E. Poisson,Absorption of mass and angular momentum by a black hole: Time-domain formalisms for gravitational perturbations, and the small-hole/slow-motion approximation, Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 084044 [gr-qc/0407050]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  46. [46]

    Kobayashi, S

    H. Kobayashi, S. Mukohyama, N. Oshita, K. Takahashi and V. Yingcharoenrat,Dynamical Tidal Response of Non-rotating Black Holes: Connecting the MST Formalism and Worldline EFT,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 084011 [2511.12580]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    Pitre and E

    T. Pitre and E. Poisson,General relativistic dynamical tides in binary inspirals without modes,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 064004 [2311.04075]. – 24 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024