Pith.

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena · arXiv:2609.21923 v1 · submitted 18 Sep 2026 · 190 references

Nonlinearly Causal General-Relativistic Two-Fluid Dissipative Magnetohydrodynamics

Elias R. Most, Samuel J. Dunham

PDF · arXiv · The abstract, sentence by sentence · Cite

The paper says

“We present a formulation of general-relativistic (GR) 19-moment dissipative magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), capable of handling all first-order dissipative terms (viscosity, heat conductivity, resistivity and Hall terms), as well as all ideal electron degrees of freedom (number density, momentum and energy) in a GR astrophysical two-fluid plasma.”

more of the abstract

We derive necessary and sufficient nonlinear causality conditions for the constrained first-order 19-moment system, as well as both necessary and sufficient conditions for strong hyperbolicity. To assess the formulation numerically, we develop a high-resolution shock-capturing scheme that solves these equations in a performance-portable fashion. The scheme expresses all evolution equations, including the dissipative and electron sectors, in flux-divergence form, allowing us to model systems with scales separated by orders of magnitude without resolving kinetic scales everywhere on the grid. In addition, we use implicit integration methods to systematically overstep kinetic scales in MHD regions, such as cyclotron and plasma frequencies. To make the scheme as robust as GRMHD codes, we construct necessary and sufficient conditions for a conserved state to be physically admissible, and based on these construct a new physicality-enforcement scheme. As an exact validation comparison, we formulate and derive a full solution to dissipative two-fluid Bondi accretion in general relativity. We then validate the equations against a series of results from kinetic particle-in-cell models of black hole accretion and magnetospheric dynamics, demonstrating that our formulation and scheme can correctly capture major features relevant for feedback on global scales of these solutions, including dimensionless reconnection rates of order 0.1 and Braginskii-like anisotropic pressures and heat fluxes.

from the abstract

Pith says

Machine review · deepseek-v4-flash · 21 Sep 2026 · what was read was not recorded · not checked by a person

It can be wrong. Challenge this review or reply to it.

The passes disagreed. Reader: holds up. Skeptic: holds up only with conditions. Referee: major revision.

A substantial and technically serious two-fluid GR dissipative MHD framework, with real analytic causality results and credible kinetic validation, whose main genuine weakness is the unquantified mismatch between the electron-stress ordering and the pair-plasma test problems. This line is wrong

1 major objection · 7 minor

How often objections from reviews like this one are right: not yet measured

Are you an author? What you can do.

Not checked: figures, code, what the 190 references say.

The paper says, at II.B.3, Eq. (41), and Section IV.B, IV.C

The review did not quote this passage.

Pith says: Objection 1 of 1 · major

The derivation truncates the electron stress-energy tensor from the total energy-momentum conservation (Eq. 41) under the assumption m_e/m_i << 1; however, the primary validation against GRPIC simulations (Wald pair magnetosphere and balding black hole) is performed for pair plasmas with m_e = m_i.

more of objection 1

The authors acknowledge this limitation in the text and claim that 'with adjusted closure models, solutions of this system can reproduce all main features' (Sec. II.B.3), but they provide no quantitative estimate of the error introduced by the omitted electron stress (e_e, P_e, Q_e^μ). Without such an estimate or a scaling argument showing that the neglected terms are subdominant in the reconnection layer, the agreement with kinetic simulations may be coincidental or result from parameter tuning. The authors should either bound the magnitude of the discarded terms relative to the retained ion and electromagnetic contributions in the test problems, or demonstrate that the results are insensitive to the closure adjustments over a range of parameters. This is a load-bearing issue because the central claim—that the 19-moment formulation captures the essential collisionless dynamics—rests on the pair-plasma comparisons.

7 minor objections

The paper says, at General

Pith says: minor objection 1 of 7

The paper is exceptionally long (over 60 pages with appendices). A more concise presentation of the appendices, particularly the eigenvector tabulations, would improve readability. Consider moving some of the explicit algebra to the companion Mathematica script.

The paper says, at Eq. (84b) and surrounding text

Pith says: minor objection 2 of 7

The definition of τ contains both ion-dissipative and electromagnetic contributions. A brief summary of the variables entering each row of the conservation law would help the reader parse the dense notation.

show 5 more

The paper says, at Fig. 1 caption

Pith says: minor objection 3 of 7

The caption states 'Solid black curves are the exact Bondi reference solution' but the figure uses black curves for the exact solution and red circles for GR19M. The legend in the plot uses a different convention (black vs red). For clarity, unify the caption and legend conventions.

The paper says, at Fig. 6

Pith says: minor objection 4 of 7

The upper panel of Fig. 6 shows H^φ/B0; the label and color bar should indicate units. The lower panel uses a color scale for j·B/B_0^2 and J^μ J_μ/B_0^2; these are different quantities and could be confusing without clear separation in the panel.

The paper says, at III.C.1

Pith says: minor objection 5 of 7

The derivation of the implicit solver (Eqs. 125-139) heavily uses symbols like Q^μ_ν, P^αβ_γδ, etc. with many subscripts. A small note explicitly stating which indices are free and which are summed within each expression would reduce possible confusion.

The paper says, at Appendix G

Pith says: minor objection 6 of 7

The physical admissibility conditions are given in terms of undensitized orthonormal Eulerian tetrad variables. Since the code works with densitized conserved variables, a short paragraph connecting the two sets would be helpful.

The paper says, at V. Conclusions

Pith says: minor objection 7 of 7

The conclusion mentions that the next step is systematic calibration against GRPIC. That is a natural future direction; it would strengthen the paper to state whether the current validation already tests a range of magnetizations and plasma betas, or if those scans are still incomplete.

What would settle it

From the pair-plasma Wald simulation (Sec IV B, e.g., t=62 r_g/c), compute the full electron stress-energy tensor T^{μν}_e (Eq. 44) and its norm relative to the retained total T^{μν}_i + T^{μν}_EM in the current sheet around the X-points (Fig. 8). If max|T^{μν}_e| / max|T^{μν}_i + T^{μν}_EM| > 0.1 in any component, the truncation is not negligible and the principled grounding of the model's success is unsupported.

from the skeptic's reading

How the review went

4 readings by deepseek-v4-flash · 21 Sep 2026

  1. Reader holds up confidence high
  2. Skeptic agrees: says it holds up only with conditions 33 s · 71,869 tokens read, 3,250 written Electron stress is omitted from total conservation (Eq. 41) under m_e/m_i << 1, but key reconnection validation is in pair plasmas with m_e = m_i; no error bound is provided.
  3. Editor wrote the verdict above 20 s · 72,851 tokens read, 1,396 written
  4. Referee major revision: 1 major objection, 7 minor 25 s · 72,139 tokens read, 2,428 written

Not run on this paper: the simulated authors' defence.

Pith did not check this review's objections against the paper.

The review in full

The review in brief, machine-written

You should know two things upfront. First, this is a serious paper, not a toy or a promissory note. Second, its main soft spot is also visible on the face of the manuscript: the derivation drops electron stress from total conservation under me/mi << 1, and the key reconnection validations are pair plasmas with me = mi. The authors acknowledge this and say adjusted closures reproduce the kinetic runs, but they do not quantify the error. That is a real gap, and it is the right thing to push on in review.

What is actually new: a 19-moment two-fluid GR MHD system that keeps viscosity, heat conduction, resistivity, Hall terms, and full electron number/momentum/energy dynamics, together with necessary and sufficient nonlinear causality and strong hyperbolicity conditions for the constrained first-order system. That combination is genuinely new. The numerical scheme is also a real piece of work: flux-conservative form, IMEX stepping, physicality enforcement, primitive recovery, AMR on GPUs. The exact dissipative two-fluid Bondi solution is a nice addition, and the code reproduces it to very high precision. The validation against independent GRPIC results for Bondi-like accretion, Wald magnetospheres, and balding black holes is the credible part of the paper: reconnection rates near 0.1c, flux decay times, pressure anisotropy, and heat flux all line up with kinetic simulations. The Mathematica checks and the detailed characteristic analysis also support the formal claims.

Where the soft spots are: the electron-stress truncation is the one I would not wave through. The pair-plasma tests operate outside the stated mass-ratio ordering, and the closure parameters are adjusted rather than derived. The authors are transparent about this, but transparency is not an error bound. A quantitative estimate of the omitted electron stress in the validation regime would materially strengthen the claim that the 19-moment closure is capturing collisionless physics rather than being tuned to imitate it. The pair-injection scheme and the conductivity cap are also problem-dependent; that is probably acceptable for a first presentation, but it should be stated more prominently.

The citation pattern looks fair. The paper builds on the authors' prior numerical work, but the central validations use other groups' GRPIC results, and the formal claims are checked independently rather than fitted. The LLM and code-assistance disclosure is unusually honest, and the verification trail makes it a virtue rather than a concern.

Who this is for: numerical relativists, plasma astrophysicists, and anyone building global models of black-hole magnetospheres or accretion flows where collisionless dissipation matters. It deserves a serious refereeing process, not a desk rejection, and I would cite it once it clears review. My recommendation: send it to referees, and make the referee report focus on the pair-plasma mismatch and the missing error estimate rather than on the formalism, which is the strongest part of the paper.

The strongest objection

The model's central validation (reconnection rates ≈0.1c in black-hole magnetospheres, Secs. IV B, IV C) is performed for pair plasmas where m_e = m_i, yet the derivation truncates the electron stress-energy tensor from total conservation (Eq. 41) under the explicit assumption m_e/m_i << 1. The paper acknowledges this limitation and asserts that solutions with 'adjusted closure models' reproduce GRPIC results, but provides no quantitative estimate of the error induced by the omitted electron stress. If the neglected terms (e_e, P_e, Q^μ_e in the total stress) are of order unity in the reconnection layer, the agreement with kinetic simulations may be coincidental or rely on tuned parameters, rather than demonstrating that the 19-moment formulation captures the essential collisionless dynamics from first principles.

The reader's weakest_assumption identifies exactly this point: the electron stress neglect is valid only for small mass ratio and bounded heating, yet the empirical validation uses equal-mass pair plasmas. This is the cornerstone of the central claim (reproducing collisionless reconnection). The paper's own acknowledgement and the lack of error bound make this the most load-bearing vulnerability. A conditional acceptance—requiring a demonstrated smallness of the omitted stress in the pair regime—would ensure the central claim rests on solid foundations rather than only on empirical fit.

The referee's report

If the claimed agreement with kinetic simulations holds in broader regimes, this work provides a fluid framework that bridges the gap between global GRMHD and kinetic scales for black-hole accretion and magnetospheric dynamics. The systematic derivation of causality and strong-hyperbolicity conditions for a two-fluid dissipative system with electron dynamics is a technical advance. The availability of an exact dissipative Bondi solution and a performance-portable GPU/CPU code are practical contributions that could enable large-scale simulations of collisionless plasma processes without resolving kinetic scales.

Pith's reading of the paper (a machine's summary, not the authors')

This paper presents a general-relativistic 19-moment dissipative magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) formulation that includes all first-order dissipative terms (viscosity, heat conductivity, resistivity, and Hall terms) and ideal electron degrees of freedom. The authors derive necessary and sufficient nonlinear causality conditions and strong hyperbolicity conditions for the constrained first-order system. They implement a numerical scheme that uses implicit-explicit time integration to overstep kinetic scales, enabling global simulations without resolving plasma frequencies or cyclotron periods. The scheme is validated against analytic dissipative Bondi accretion and against particle-in-cell simulations of black-hole accretion and magnetospheres, reproducing dimensionless reconnection rates of order 0.1 and Braginskii-like anisotropic pressures and heat fluxes. This work provides a framework for modeling weakly collisional plasmas in general-relativistic astrophysical settings where both resistive dissipation and anisotropic transport are important.

What carries the argument. The central object is the 19-moment general-relativistic two-fluid system, comprising 14 moments (energy-momentum tensor and particle current) for each charged species (ions and electrons) plus the electromagnetic field, but with the ion frame reduction that retains only ion dissipative moments (bulk, shear, heat) and electron number, momentum, and energy as dynamical variables. The argument is carried by the nonlinear causality and strong-hyperbolicity conditions derived for the constrained first-order system, which bound the dissipative fluxes (heat, shear, bulk, drift current) and the relaxation times. The numerical scheme rests on a flux-divergence form with high-resolution shock capturing and implicit-explicit time stepping that treats the stiff relaxations and plasma frequencies implicitly, allowing timesteps larger than the kinetic scales.

Core claim. The paper claims that a 19-moment two-fluid closure for general-relativistic dissipative magnetohydrodynamics, when combined with explicit nonlinear causality and strong-hyperbolicity conditions, can correctly capture the macroscopic consequences of collisionless plasma physics in global simulations of black-hole accretion and magnetospheres. In particular, the formulation reproduces fast magnetic reconnection at rates of order 0.1c (characteristic of kinetic calculations) and pressure anisotropies and heat fluxes consistent with Braginskii theory, without the need to resolve kinetic scales everywhere on the computational grid. The key advance is the systematic derivation of causal and strongly hyperbolic constraints that keep the truncated moment system well-posed, together with a robust numerical scheme that handles multiple disparate scales via implicit integration.

The premise it rests on. The electron stress tensor is neglected in the total energy-momentum conservation (Eq. 41), which is justified only when the electron-to-ion mass ratio is small and electron heating and drift stay bounded; the 19-moment closure is assumed to capture the essential collisionless dynamics, but its validity is tested only for specific parameter regimes.

If the paper is right (Pith's inferences, not the authors')

Global simulations of low-luminosity accretion flows around black holes can now simultaneously model anisotropic pressure, heat conduction, and resistive dissipation from reconnection, all of which are believed to affect the observable signatures of M87* and Sgr A*.

The framework can be extended to include electron stress in the total energy-momentum tensor, enabling self-consistent modeling of electron-ion thermodynamics and pair production in jets and coronae.

The causal and strongly hyperbolic conditions provide a template for building well-posed moment closures in other relativistic transport problems, such as neutrino radiation transport or relativistic heavy-ion collisions.

The numerical scheme, with its ability to overstep kinetic scales, can be applied to problems with extreme scale separation, such as neutron-star merger outflows and pulsar wind nebulae, where both large-scale dynamics and small-scale dissipation matter.

If the 19-moment closure proves reliable across a wider parameter range (different magnetizations, mass ratios, guide fields), it could replace ad hoc anomalous-resistivity prescriptions in most astrophysical simulations, removing a free parameter.

The charge-starvation mechanism captured by the scheme (currents approaching the carrier-density limit) suggests that reconnection rates in black-hole magnetospheres are primarily controlled by the pair supply and the drift bound, not by the microscopic collision time.

The explicit eigenvector decomposition provided in the appendices may enable the construction of characteristic-based Riemann solvers that are sharper than the HLLE flux used here, potentially reducing numerical dissipation in current sheets.

The framework could be adapted to multi-species plasmas with arbitrary charge-to-mass ratios, enabling studies of composition effects in relativistic outflows.

Check this review

Pith stored no record of this review's passes and took no fingerprint of it. Reviews made by code from 13 Nov 2026 on carry both.

How often reviews like this one are right

Reviews like this one: written by deepseek-v4-flash, where what was read was not recorded.

How often objections from reviews like this one are right: not yet measured

Every value above, in the review's public record (JSON)

Reviews by people

This review was written by a machine. No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We present a formulation of general-relativistic (GR) 19-moment dissipative magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), capable of handling all first-order dissipative terms (viscosity, heat conductivity, resistivity and Hall terms), as well as all ideal electron degrees of freedom (number density, momentum and energy) in a GR astrophysical two-fluid plasma. We derive necessary and sufficient nonlinear causality conditions for the constrained first-order 19-moment system, as well as both necessary and sufficient conditions for strong hyperbolicity. To assess the formulation numerically, we develop a high-resolution shock-capturing scheme that solves these equations in a performance-portable fashion. The scheme expresses all evolution equations, including the dissipative and electron sectors, in flux-divergence form, allowing us to model systems with scales separated by orders of magnitude without resolving kinetic scales everywhere on the grid. In addition, we use implicit integration methods to systematically overstep kinetic scales in MHD regions, such as cyclotron and plasma frequencies. To make the scheme as robust as GRMHD codes, we construct necessary and sufficient conditions for a conserved state to be physically admissible, and based on these construct a new physicality-enforcement scheme. As an exact validation comparison, we formulate and derive a full solution to dissipative two-fluid Bondi accretion in general relativity. We then validate the equations against a series of results from kinetic particle-in-cell models of black hole accretion and magnetospheric dynamics, demonstrating that our formulation and scheme can correctly capture major features relevant for feedback on global scales of these solutions, including dimensionless reconnection rates of order 0.1 and Braginskii-like anisotropic pressures and heat fluxes.

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23

The authors' main claim, as the classifier picked it out 0.99

“We then validate the equations against a series of results from kinetic particle-in-cell models of black hole accretion and magnetospheric dynamics, demonstrating that our formulation and scheme can correctly capture major features relevant for feedback on global scales of these solutions, including dimensionless reconnection rates of order $0.1$ and Braginskii-like anisotropic pressures and heat fluxes.”

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.15 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.18 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.95 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.04

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We present a formulation of general-relativistic (GR) 19-moment dissipative magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), capable of handling all first-order dissipative terms (viscosity, heat conductivity, resistivity and Hall terms), as well as all ideal electron degrees of freedom (number density, momentum and energy) in a GR astrophysical two-fluid plasma. contribution 1.00 0.94 0.13 asserted 1.00
We derive necessary and sufficient nonlinear causality conditions for the constrained first-order 19-moment system, as well as both necessary and sufficient conditions for strong hyperbolicity. contribution 0.72 0.96 0.20 asserted 1.00
To assess the formulation numerically, we develop a high-resolution shock-capturing scheme that solves these equations in a performance-portable fashion. method 0.87 0.96 0.05 asserted 1.00
The scheme expresses all evolution equations, including the dissipative and electron sectors, in flux-divergence form, allowing us to model systems with scales separated by orders of magnitude without resolving kinetic scales everywhere on the grid. method 0.99 0.95 0.06 asserted 1.00
In addition, we use implicit integration methods to systematically overstep kinetic scales in MHD regions, such as cyclotron and plasma frequencies. method 0.97 0.95 0.04 asserted 1.00
To make the scheme as robust as GRMHD codes, we construct necessary and sufficient conditions for a conserved state to be physically admissible, and based on these construct a new physicality-enforcement scheme. method 0.75 0.97 0.06 asserted 1.00
As an exact validation comparison, we formulate and derive a full solution to dissipative two-fluid Bondi accretion in general relativity. method 0.65 0.97 0.06 asserted 1.00
We then validate the equations against a series of results from kinetic particle-in-cell models of black hole accretion and magnetospheric dynamics, demonstrating that our formulation and scheme can correctly capture major features relevant for feedback on global scales of these solutions, including dimensionless reconnection rates of order $0.1$ and Braginskii-like anisotropic pressures and heat fluxes. result 0.92 0.92 0.62 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.81 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.81

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,602 input tokens.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Figures (17)
Figure 1 of the paper
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Dissipative Bondi solution for
Figure 2 of the paper
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Weakly collisional Bondi-like accretion flow onto a Kerr
Figure 3 of the paper
Figure 3. shows the horizon accretion rate and the magnetic flux threading the horizon as functions of time. Starting from the static initial state, the accretion rate rises to M˙ ≃ 1.5 M˙ B by t ≃ 40 rg/c as the inner region drains, then decays by more than an order of magnitude to 0.067 M˙ B at t ≃ 280 rg/c. In the equal-mass case, the horizon magnetic flux builds up over the same interval, reaching 2.1 Φ0 at t ≃ 120 rg/c, and then falls back to 0.61 Φ0 by t ≃ 320 rg/c. That exponential de￾cay agrees well with GRPIC simulations [147] (see also Sec. IV B), where fitting Φ ∝ e −t/τΦ over 150…
Figure 4 of the paper
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Accretion properties of the near-horizon flow for the equal-mass pair run,
Figure 5 of the paper
Figure 5. FIG. 5. Same as Fig. 4 but for
Figure 6 of the paper
Figure 6. FIG. 6. Wald magnetosphere at time
Figure 7 of the paper
Figure 7. FIG. 7. Overall morphology of the jet region in the Wald problem at
Figure 8 of the paper
Figure 8. FIG. 8. Wald current-sheet zoom-in at
Figure 9 of the paper
Figure 9. FIG. 9. Current and nonideal-field diagnostics in the Wald current sheet at
Figure 10 of the paper
Figure 10. FIG. 10. Effective resistivity along vertical cuts through the two X-points in Fig. 8. The solid black curve is the effective scalar resistivity,
Figure 11 of the paper
Figure 11. FIG. 11. Balding black hole magnetosphere at
Figure 12 of the paper
Figure 12. FIG. 12. Near-horizon flow and toroidal field during the onset of balding at
Figure 14 of the paper
Figure 14. FIG. 14. Unsigned horizon flux of the balding black hole, normalized
Figure 15 of the paper
Figure 15. FIG. 15. X-point reconnection properties of the balding magnetosphere. Here, we focus on two representative X-points at different times, one
Figure 16 of the paper
Figure 16. FIG. 16. Example solution of the implicit equation illustrating the two branches. Only the top (solid) solution has a valid continuum limit for
Figure 17 of the paper
Figure 17. FIG. 17. Relativistic firehose instability.

Showing 16 of the paper's 17 figures. Figures are the authors', reproduced from the paper.

References (190)
  1. [1] Electric current and electric field update We use we:= he me = He ρe , ω e:= qe me He, χ e:= qe me Pe.(J1) The undensitized current moment and its spatial flux are γ−1/2ek∗ν=W(k ν−ωeuν)−(n µkµ)uν +χenν,(J2) Fi(k∗ν)=√γ W(αvi−β i) (kν−ωeuν) +αkiuν−αχeδi ν .(J3) The corresponding... on Pith
  2. [2] Electron-energy recovery Alongside the electric-field update, we evolve the electron energy implicitly because it enters the dynamical Ohm law: eEe∗ = eE∗ e∗ + ∆tI √γ(−Peθ+e µjµ).(J20) De=Wρ e− κe we , κ e :=α me qe k0. WritingUe :=γ−1/2eE∗ e∗ gives the scalar map emap e = Ue ... on Pith
  3. [3] Residual equations and momentum recovery The momentum equation of the reduced problem is linear inzk up to the shear stress, Sred j = ρbh∗Wδ k j− α u0 πk j zk =:A k jzk,(H25) and is solved forz k by a lower–upper (LU) decomposition with partial pivoting of the3×3matrixA. Defin... on Pith
  4. [4] Nonlinear solution and acceptance The overall recovery sequence and its two initial guesses are summarized in Sec. III C 2. The input checks, required conservative corrections, and construction of the source-free C2P state follow the physicality-enforcement procedure of Append... on Pith
  5. [5] Atmosphere floors and causal regulation After a root has been found, we enforce the density and ve- locity ranges and the magnetization ceiling. A species pair that already satisfies these bounds is unchanged. If an atmo- sphere or magnetization floor raisesD b, the electron d... on Pith
  6. [6] Braginskii limit: firehose instability As a validation of the Braginskii viscous sector, we re- produce the relativistic firehose instability of Chandraet al. [55]. When the field-parallel pressure exceeds the perpen- dicular pressure by more than twice the magnetic pressure, ... on Pith
  7. [7] Basic setup We solve the problem in Schwarzschild coordinates, on the exterior chartr>2M, soA>0, ds2 =−A(r)dt 2 +A(r)−1dr2 +r 2dΩ2,A(r) := 1− 2M r . (L1) Let v(r) :=u r <0, R(r) := p A+v 2 =−u t.(L2) Normalization and future directedness then give uµ = R A,v,0,0 , s µ = v A,R,... on Pith
  8. [8] Mass-flux elimination and kinematics Mass conservation enforces ∇µ(ρbuµ) = 1 r2 d dr (r2ρbv) = 0.(L6) Defining a positive inward accretion rate gives ˙M=−4πr 2ρbv >0, ρ b =− ˙M 4πr2v, ρ′ b ρb =− 2 r− v′ v. (L7) Thus,ρ b is eliminated algebraically and ˙Mbecomes an eigen- param... on Pith
  9. [9] Shear convention and directional pressures Introduce∆µν =g µν +uµuν and the tangential projector Pµν ⊥ := ∆µν−sµsν.(L14) The unique symmetric, trace-free, flow-orthogonal stress compatible with spherical symmetry is πµν =ϖ sµsν− 1 2Pµν ⊥ ,(L15) with comoving eigenvalues(ϖ,−ϖ/2... on Pith
  10. [10] Stress-energy conservation The material stress-energy tensor is Tµν mat =eu µuν + (P+ Π)∆µν +q(uµsν +sµuν) +πµν. (L19) 72 For parallel comoving electric and magnetic fields the Poynt- ing flux vanishes, and with ϵEM := E2 +B 2 2 (L20) the traceless electromagnetic stress has e... on Pith
  11. [11] Israel-Stewart closure For a local closure, the constrained spherical reductions of the flux-divergent Israel–Stewart equations take the scalar form 0 =R Π :=τ ΠvΠ′ + Π +ζθ+δ ΠΠΠθ,(L27) 0 =R q :=τ qvq′ +q+κ(RT) ′ +δqqqθ,(L28) 0 =R π :=τ πvϖ′ +ϖ+ 2ησ ∥ +δππϖθ,(L29) with instant... on Pith
  12. [12] Numerical approach a. Structure and index After mass-flux elimination, the full Bondi system has 8 degrees of freedom, Y= (v,T,q,ϖ,Π,E,k,e e)T.(L43) In order to enforce positivity constraints on some of those variables and facilitate numerical solutions that can span mul- tipl... on Pith
  13. [13] Example solution used in the main text For the reference solution presented in Sec. IV A, we use N= 353Hermite nodes in four moving segments, with 65, 65, 97, and 129 nodes before endpoint identification. The first three segments are uniform inlnr. In the last segment the unif... on Pith
  14. [14] Reference metric formulation We introduce the flat reference three-metric in cylindrical coordinates on the positive-radius chartR>0, ˆγij = diag 1,1,R 2 , p ˆγ=R,(M1) and further introduce the weight-zero reference density ˆU:= rγ ˆγU= eU R,(M2) of a state vectorU. Becauseˆγc... on Pith
  15. [15] Boundary conditions on the axis A subtle aspect of axisymmetric evolution is the behavior on the axis. The axis both acts as a face term in the flux update and provides the interface to domain ghost cells beyond it; both roles require special treatment. Ghost-cell boundary con... on Pith
  16. [16] S. W. Davis and A. Tchekhovskoy, Magnetohydrodynamics Simulations of Active Galactic Nucleus Disks and Jets, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.58, 407 (2020), arXiv:2101.08839 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  17. [17] A. Philippov and M. Kramer, Pulsar Magnetospheres and Their Radiation, ARA&A60, 495 (2022) on Pith
  18. [18] J. Arons, Pulsar wind nebulae as cosmic pevatrons: a current sheet’s tale, Space Science Reviews173, 341 (2012) on Pith
  19. [19] N. Andersson and G. L. Comer, Relativistic fluid dynam- ics: physics for many different scales, Living Rev. Rel.24, 3 (2021), arXiv:2008.12069 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  20. [20] D. Shen, J. Chen, X.-G. Huang, Y .-G. Ma, A. Tang, and G. Wang, A Review of Intense Electromagnetic Fields in Heavy-Ion Collisions: Theoretical Predictions and Experi- mental Results, Research8, 0726 (2025), arXiv:2512.00739 [nucl-ex] on PitharXiv
show 80 more
  1. [21] P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke,Relativistic Fluid Dy- namics In and Out of Equilibrium, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2019) arXiv:1712.05815 [nucl-th] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  2. [22] L. Rezzolla and O. Zanotti,Relativistic hydrodynamics(Ox- ford University Press, 2013) on Pith
  3. [23] A. M. Anile,Relativistic Fluids and Magneto-Fluids: With Applications in Astrophysics and Plasma Physics(Cambridge University Press, 1989) on Pith
  4. [24] L. Sironi and A. Spitkovsky, Relativistic Reconnection: an Ef- ficient Source of Non-Thermal Particles, Astrophys. J. Lett. 783, L21 (2014), arXiv:1401.5471 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  5. [25] U. Heinz and R. Snellings, Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.63, 123 (2013), arXiv:1301.2826 [nucl-th] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  6. [26] D. J. Gershman, S. A. Fuselier, I. J. Cohen, D. L. Turner, Y .-H. Liu, L.-J. Chen, T. D. Phan, J. E. Stawarz, G. A. DiBraccio, A. Masters,et al., Magnetic reconnection at planetary bodies and astrospheres, Space Science Reviews220, 7 (2024) on Pith
  7. [27] K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Su- permassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  8. [28] K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittar- ius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro- ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  9. [29] M. W. Kunz, A. A. Schekochihin, and J. M. Stone, Firehose and Mirror Instabilities in a Collisionless Shearing Plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 205003 (2014), arXiv:1402.0010 [astro- ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  10. [30] P. Kempski, E. Quataert, J. Squire, and M. W. Kunz, Shearing- box simulations of MRI-driven turbulence in weakly colli- sional accretion discs, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.486, 4013 (2019), arXiv:1901.04504 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  11. [31] F. Foucart, M. Chandra, C. F. Gammie, E. Quataert, and A. Tchekhovskoy, How important is non-ideal physics in simulations of sub-Eddington accretion on to spinning black holes?, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.470, 2240 (2017), arXiv:1706.01533 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  12. [32] V . Dhruv, B. Prather, M. Chandra, A. V . Joshi, and C. F. Gammie, Electromagnetic Observables of Weakly Collisional Black Hole Accretion, Astrophys. J. Lett.993, L33 (2025), arXiv:2510.11365 [astro-ph.HE] on PitharXiv
  13. [33] C. F. Gammie, J. C. McKinney, and G. Toth, HARM: A Nu- merical scheme for general relativistic magnetohydrodynam- ics, Astrophys. J.589, 444 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0301509 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  14. [34] J.-P. De Villiers and J. F. Hawley, A Numerical method for general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, Astrophys. J.589, 458 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0210518 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  15. [35] O. Porthet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), The Event Horizon General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Code Comparison Project, Astrophys. J. Suppl.243, 26 (2019), 78 arXiv:1904.04923 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  16. [36] S. Zenitani and M. Hoshino, Particle Acceleration and Mag- netic Dissipation in Relativistic Current Sheet of Pair Plasmas, Astrophys. J.670, 702 (2007) on Pith
  17. [37] M. Barkov, S. S. Komissarov, V . Korolev, and A. Zankovich, A multidimensional numerical scheme for two-fluid rela- tivistic magneto-hydrodynamics, MNRAS438, 704 (2014), arXiv:1309.5221 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  18. [38] S. Zenitani, M. Hesse, and A. Klimas, Two-Fluid MHD Sim- ulations of Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection, Astrophys. J.696, 1385 (2009), [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 722, 968–969 (2010)], arXiv:0902.2074 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  19. [39] S. Koide, Generalized Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Equations for Pair and Electron-Ion Plasmas, Astrophys. J. 696, 2220 (2009), [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 701, 2033 (2009)], arXiv:0902.4292 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  20. [40] M. V . Barkov and S. S. Komissarov, Relativistic tearing and drift-kink instabilities in two-fluid simulations, MNRAS458, 1939 (2016), arXiv:1602.02848 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  21. [41] M. Chandra, C. F. Gammie, F. Foucart, and E. Quataert, An Extended Magnetohydrodynamics Model for Relativistic Weakly Collisional Plasmas, Astrophys. J.810, 162 (2015), arXiv:1508.00878 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  22. [42] F. Foucart, M. Chandra, C. F. Gammie, and E. Quataert, Evo- lution of Accretion Discs around a Kerr Black Hole using Ex- tended Magnetohydrodynamics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 456, 1332 (2016), arXiv:1511.04445 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  23. [43] L. Sironi, D. A. Uzdensky, and D. Giannios, Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection in Astrophysical Plasmas: A Pow- erful Mechanism of Nonthermal Emission, ARA&A63, 127 (2025), arXiv:2506.02101 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  24. [44] D. A. Uzdensky, N. F. Loureiro, and A. A. Schekochihin, Fast magnetic reconnection in the plasmoid-dominated regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 235002 (2010), arXiv:1008.3330 [astro- ph.SR] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  25. [45] F. Guo, Y .-H. Liu, W. Daughton, and H. Li, Particle Acceler- ation and Plasma Dynamics during Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetically-dominated Regime, Astrophys. J.806, 167 (2015), arXiv:1504.02193 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  26. [46] C. Palenzuela, L. Lehner, O. Reula, and L. Rezzolla, Beyond ideal MHD: towards a more realistic modeling of relativistic astrophysical plasmas, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.394, 1727 (2009), arXiv:0810.1838 [astro-ph] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  27. [47] B. Ripperda, O. Porth, C. Xia, and R. Keppens, Reconnec- tion and particle acceleration in interacting flux ropes – I. Magnetohydrodynamics and test particles in 2.5D, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.467, 3279 (2017), arXiv:1611.09966 [astro- ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  28. [48] M. Goodbred and Y .-H. Liu, First-Principles Theory of the Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection Rate in Astrophys- ical Pair Plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 265101 (2022), arXiv:2301.12111 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  29. [49] A. Moran, L. Sironi, A. Levis, B. Ripperda, E. R. Most, and S. Selvi, Effective Resistivity in Relativistic Reconnection: A Prescription Based on Fully Kinetic Simulations, Astrophys. J. Lett.978, L45 (2025), arXiv:2501.04800 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  30. [50] B. Ripperda, M. P. Grehan, A. Moran, S. Selvi, L. Sironi, A. Philippov, A. Bransgrove, and O. Porth, Magnetic re- connection with a 0.1 rate: Effective resistivity in general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, arXiv e-prints (2026), arXiv:2601.02460 [astro-ph.HE] on PitharXiv
  31. [51] S. Selvi, O. Porth, B. Ripperda, F. Bacchini, L. Sironi, and R. Keppens, Effective Resistivity in Relativistic Col- lisionless Reconnection, Astrophys. J.950, 169 (2023), arXiv:2211.04553 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  32. [52] M. Bugli, E. F. Lopresti, E. Figueiredo, A. Mignone, B. Cerutti, G. Mattia, L. Del Zanna, G. Bodo, and V . Berta, Relativistic reconnection with effective resistivity - I. Dy- namics and reconnection rate, Astron. Astrophys.693, A233 (2025), arXiv:2410.20924 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  33. [53] N. Bessho and A. Bhattacharjee, Fast collisionless reconnec- tion in electron-positron plasmasa), Physics of Plasmas14, 056503 (2007) on Pith
  34. [54] A. Robbins and A. Spitkovsky, Transition to Petschek Re- connection in Subrelativistic Pair Plasmas: Implications for Particle Acceleration, Astrophys. J.995, 163 (2025), arXiv:2508.08533 [physics.plasm-ph] on PitharXiv
  35. [55] C. Palenzuela, Modeling magnetized neutron stars using re- sistive MHD, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.431, 1853 (2013), arXiv:1212.0130 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  36. [56] K. Dionysopoulou, D. Alic, C. Palenzuela, L. Rezzolla, and B. Giacomazzo, General-Relativistic Resistive Magnetohy- drodynamics in three dimensions: formulation and tests, Phys. Rev. D88, 044020 (2013), arXiv:1208.3487 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  37. [57] K. Dionysopoulou, D. Alic, and L. Rezzolla, General- relativistic resistive-magnetohydrodynamic simulations of bi- nary neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D92, 084064 (2015), arXiv:1502.02021 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  38. [58] B. Ripperda, F. Bacchini, O. Porth, E. R. Most, H. Olivares, A. Nathanail, L. Rezzolla, J. Teunissen, and R. Keppens, General relativistic resistive magnetohydrodynamics with ro- bust primitive variable recovery for accretion disk simula- tions, Astrophys. J. Suppl.244, 10 (20... on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  39. [59] A. J. Wright and I. Hawke, A resistive extension for ideal mag- netohydrodynamics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.491, 5510 (2020), arXiv:1906.03150 [physics.plasm-ph] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  40. [60] B. Ripperda, F. Bacchini, and A. Philippov, Magnetic Re- connection and Hot Spot Formation in Black Hole Accre- tion Disks, Astrophys. J.900, 100 (2020), arXiv:2003.04330 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  41. [61] M. Shibata, S. Fujibayashi, and Y . Sekiguchi, Long-term evo- lution of neutron-star merger remnants in general relativistic resistive magnetohydrodynamics with a mean-field dynamo term, Phys. Rev. D104, 063026 (2021), arXiv:2109.08732 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  42. [62] G. Mattia, L. Del Zanna, M. Bugli, A. Pavan, R. Ciolfi, G. Bodo, and A. Mignone, Resistive relativistic MHD sim- ulations of astrophysical jets, Astron. Astrophys.679, A49 (2023), arXiv:2308.09477 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  43. [63] S. Azizi, S. Shankar, P. Mösta, R. Haas, and E. Schnetter, A resistive MHD module in the GPU-accelerated GRMHD code GRaM-X, Class. Quant. Grav.43, 175009 (2026), arXiv:2510.18968 [astro-ph.HE] on PitharXiv
  44. [64] M. Beaudoin, M. Ujevic, R. Jaeger, A. Neuweiler, H. Gieg, K. Kiuchi, and T. Dietrich, Extending the infrastructure of the BAM code towards resistive general-relativistic mag- netohydrodynamics: tests and first applications (2026), arXiv:2607.11670 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  45. [65] M. Miravet-Tenés, I. Hawke, R. Matur, and A. J. Wright, An efficient approach to resistive GRMHD simulations of binary neutron star mergers (2026), arXiv:2609.12998 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  46. [66] S. Braginskii, Transport processes in a plasma, Reviews of plasma physics1(1965) on Pith
  47. [67] G. F. Chew, M. L. Goldberger, and F. E. Low, The Boltzmann Equation and the One-Fluid Hydromagnetic Equations in the Absence of Particle Collisions, Proceedings of the Royal So- ciety of London Series A236, 112 (1956). 79 on Pith
  48. [68] F. Ley, A. Tran, and E. G. Zweibel, On the double- adiabatic equations in the relativistic regime, arXiv e- prints 10.48550/arXiv.2603.25594 (2026), arXiv:2603.25594 [physics.plasm-ph] on PithPith's reviewarXivdoi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.25594
  49. [69] A. Wierzchucka, P. J. Bilbao, A. G. R. Thomas, D. A. Uzdensky, and A. A. Schekochihin, Double-adiabatic equa- tions of state for relativistic plasmas, arXiv e-prints 10.48550/arXiv.2603.25669 (2026), arXiv:2603.25669 [astro- ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXivdoi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.25669
  50. [70] M. Chandra, F. Foucart, and C. F. Gammie, grim: A Flexible, Conservative Scheme for Relativistic Fluid Theories, Astro- phys. J.837, 92 (2017), arXiv:1702.01106 [astro-ph.IM] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  51. [71] D. Chatterjee, T. Elghozi, J. Novak, and M. Oertel, Consis- tent neutron star models with magnetic field dependent equa- tions of state, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.447, 3785 (2015), arXiv:1410.6332 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  52. [72] O. M. Pimentel, F. D. Lora-Clavijo, and G. A. González, Numerical general relativistic MHD with magnetically polar- ized matter, Astrophys. J.861, 115 (2018), arXiv:1806.02266 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  53. [73] E. R. Most, J. Peterson, L. Scurto, H. Pais, and V . Dexheimer, Impact of Magnetic-field-driven Anisotropies on the Equation of State Probed in Neutron Star Mergers, Astrophys. J. Lett. 989, L29 (2025), arXiv:2506.21696 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  54. [74] A. Galishnikova, A. Philippov, E. Quataert, F. Bacchini, K. Parfrey, and B. Ripperda, Collisionless accretion onto black holes: Dynamics and flares, Physical Review Letters130, 115201 (2023), arXiv:2212.02583 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  55. [75] S. Zenitani, M. Hesse, and A. Klimas, Relativistic Two-fluid Simulations of Guide Field Magnetic Reconnection, Astro- phys. J.705, 907 (2009), arXiv:0909.1955 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  56. [76] J. Gorard, J. Juno, and A. Hakim, Beyond GRMHD: A Ro- bust Numerical Scheme for Extended, Non-Ideal General Relativistic Multifluid Simulations, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2510.26019 [gr-qc] on PitharXiv
  57. [77] S. Koide, Generalized general-relativistic magnetohydrody- namic equations for plasmas of active galactic nuclei in the era of the Event Horizon Telescope, Astrophys. J.899, 95 (2020), arXiv:2007.13029 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  58. [78] B. Ripperda, M. Liska, K. Chatterjee, G. Musoke, A. A. Philippov, S. B. Markoff, A. Tchekhovskoy, and Z. Younsi, Black Hole Flares: Ejection of Accreted Magnetic Flux through 3D Plasmoid-mediated Reconnection, Astrophys. J. Lett.924, L32 (2022), arXiv:2109.15115 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  59. [79] B. Carter, Covariant Theory of Conductivity in Ideal Fluid or Solid Media, Lect. Notes Math.1385, 1 (1989) on Pith
  60. [80] G. S. Rocha, D. Wagner, G. S. Denicol, J. Noronha, and D. H. Rischke, Theories of Relativistic Dissipative Fluid Dynamics, Entropy26, 189 (2024), arXiv:2311.15063 [nucl-th] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  61. [81] B. Carter and I. M. Khalatnikov, Canonically covariant formu- lation of Landau’s Newtonian superfluid dynamics, Rev. Math. Phys.6, 277 (1994) on Pith
  62. [82] B. Carter and D. Langlois, Relativistic models for supercon- ducting superfluid mixtures, Nucl. Phys. B531, 478 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9806024 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  63. [83] D. Langlois, D. M. Sedrakian, and B. Carter, Differential rota- tion of relativistic superfluid in neutron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.297, 1189 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9711042 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  64. [84] L. Gavassino and M. Antonelli, Thermodynamics of un- charged relativistic multifluids, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 025014 (2020), arXiv:1906.03140 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  65. [85] N. Andersson, K. Dionysopoulou, I. Hawke, and G. L. Comer, Beyond ideal magnetohydrodynamics: Resistive, reactive and relativistic plasmas, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 125002 (2017), arXiv:1610.00449 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  66. [86] N. Andersson, I. Hawke, K. Dionysopoulou, and G. L. Comer, Beyond ideal magnetohydrodynamics: from fibration to 3 + 1 foliation, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 125003 (2017), arXiv:1610.00448 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  67. [87] N. Andersson, I. Hawke, T. Celora, and G. L. Comer, The physics of non-ideal general relativistic magnetohydrody- namics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.509, 3737 (2021), arXiv:2108.08732 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  68. [88] A. Hegade K. R. and J. M. Stone, Kinetic magnetohy- drodynamics and Landau fluid closure in relativity (2026), arXiv:2604.05058 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  69. [89] C. Cercignani and G. M. Kremer,The Relativistic Boltzmann Equation: Theory and Applications, Progress in Mathematical Physics, V ol. 22 (Birkhäuser Basel, 2002) on Pith
  70. [90] G. S. Denicol, H. Niemi, E. Molnar, and D. H. Rischke, Derivation of transient relativistic fluid dynamics from the Boltzmann equation, Phys. Rev. D85, 114047 (2012), [Erra- tum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 039902 (2015)], arXiv:1202.4551 [nucl- th] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  71. [91] G. S. Denicol, X.-G. Huang, E. Molnár, G. M. Monteiro, H. Niemi, J. Noronha, D. H. Rischke, and Q. Wang, Nonresis- tive dissipative magnetohydrodynamics from the Boltzmann equation in the 14-moment approximation, Phys. Rev. D98, 076009 (2018), arXiv:1804.05210 [nucl-th] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  72. [92] G. S. Denicol, E. Molnár, H. Niemi, and D. H. Rischke, Resistive dissipative magnetohydrodynamics from the Boltzmann-Vlasov equation, Phys. Rev. D99, 056017 (2019), arXiv:1902.01699 [nucl-th] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  73. [93] K. Kushwah and G. S. Denicol, Relativistic dissipative magnetohydrodynamics from the Boltzmann equation for a two-component gas, Phys. Rev. D109, 096021 (2024), arXiv:2402.01597 [nucl-th] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  74. [94] K. Kushwah, G. S. Denicol, and C. V . P. de Brito, Rela- tivistic resistive magnetohydrodynamics for a two-component plasma, Phys. Rev. D113, 036021 (2026), arXiv:2511.14787 [physics.plasm-ph] on PitharXiv
  75. [95] G. W. Hammett, W. Dorland, and F. W. Perkins, Fluid models of phase mixing, Landau damping, and nonlinear gyrokinetic dynamics, Physics of Fluids B4, 2052 (1992) on Pith
  76. [96] L. Wang, A. H. Hakim, A. Bhattacharjee, and K. Ger- maschewski, Comparison of multi-fluid moment mod- els with particle-in-cell simulations of collisionless mag- netic reconnection, Physics of Plasmas22, 012108 (2015), arXiv:1409.0262 [physics.plasm-ph] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  77. [97] P. Romatschke, New Developments in Relativistic Vis- cous Hydrodynamics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E19, 1 (2010), arXiv:0902.3663 [hep-ph] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  78. [98] E. R. Most, J. Noronha, and A. A. Philippov, Modelling general-relativistic plasmas with collisionless moments and dissipative two-fluid magnetohydrodynamics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.514, 4989 (2022), arXiv:2111.05752 [astro- ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  79. [99] L. Gavassino, How acausal equations emerge from causal dy- namics (2026), arXiv:2604.07031 [nucl-th] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  80. [100] W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Stability and causality in dis- sipative relativistic fluids, Annals Phys.151, 466 (1983) on Pith

The first 100 of 190 references are listed here. All of them are in this paper's citation record.

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record

  1. Resistive alignment of a black-hole magnetosphere astro-ph.HE · Oct 2026
  2. The kinematic Kelvin-Helmholtz instability-driven dynamo: implications for merging compact objects astro-ph.HE · Nov 2026
  3. Breakdown of hydrodynamic universality in causal first-order viscous neutron star oscillations gr-qc · Oct 2026

Challenges and discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, or challenge this review formally: a challenge becomes a permanent entry in this paper's record, and its decision is published here.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment