Exact Regular Planar Black Holes solutions in Bumblebee gravity

Daniil Stepanenko

REVIEW

Exact Regular Planar Black Holes solutions in Bumblebee gravity

Daniil Stepanenko

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 2 Nov 2026 · 56 references

Pith's verdict: The exact solutions are probably real, but they are not regular: the singularity sits at y = C1 r + 2C2 = 0, and the paper's regularity check at r=0 tests only an interior chart point.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on November 3, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 5 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2611.03338 (version 1)

Pith IDNXN7CVZ2, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationDaniil Stepanenko. "Exact Regular Planar Black Holes solutions in Bumblebee gravity." arXiv:2611.03338 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NXN7CVZ2

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Known you'd want a straight read on Stepanenko's planar bumblebee paper. Punchline: the exact solutions are probably correct as solutions of the field equations, but the headline claim — 'regular planar black hole,' 'free of singularities at r=0' — does not survive. The singularity is elsewhere, and the paper never looks there.

Why: the metric's own area function is h(r) = (C1 r + 2C2)^2/(4C2). In planar symmetry the transverse R^2 fibers collapse only where h -> 0, which is at y = C1 r + 2C2 = 0, not at r=0. At r=0 one has h(0) = C2 != 0 and finite f; r=0 is a smooth interior point of the chart. The solution of (3.15) is f = C4 - C3/(C1 y), which diverges at y=0. So the curvature singularity sits at y=0 — outside the r >= 0 chart for the Fig. 1 parameters, but the chart extends smoothly through r=0, and a radial geodesic reaches y=0 in finite affine parameter. Checking R and K at r=0 (Eqs. 3.30-3.32, 4.37-4.38) tests an interior point, and the Conclusion's 'without a central scalar-curvature singularity' overreaches on the same evidence.

Genuine value: the derivation is coherent and the checkable part is real work. The ODE reduction, the forced xi=1/4 from (4xi-1)beta^2=0, the C4 fixups, the claimed substitution check — standard machinery, cleanly executed. Planar topology with temporal/radial bumblebee components is new relative to the cited spherically symmetric and NLED-based solutions. Reframed honestly as exact planar bumblebee black holes singular at y=0, the core would likely stand.

Soft spots, in proportion. The regularity error is load-bearing, not a quibble — it is the whole point of the paper. Secondary: reality of b_r is proven only for positive alpha, beta, C3, a branch where (3.29) puts the horizon at negative r; the horizon-bearing example (Fig. 1, beta=C3=-1) sits outside the proven domain. The printed formulas are garbled exactly where a referee needs to check: (3.29) and the f'(r_h) sentence do not parse, and the denominators in (3.26) vs (3.16) do not match under the stated C1 choice. Ref. [14] carries a placeholder DOI, and the overlap with the Li-Lu preprint [23] is left unexplained. Fixable, all of it, once the singularity structure is stated correctly.

Who it's for: people cataloging exact Lorentz-violating black holes. The xi=1/4 planar family is a legitimate catalog entry once reframed. I'd send it to a referee — the derivation deserves a real check — but tell the referee to find where h vanishes, not where r=0 sits.

Referee report

Significance

If the regularity claim were correct, the paper would provide two new exact families of singularity-free planar black holes in bumblebee gravity, with a fixed nonminimal coupling and explicit parameter relations. The algebraic strategy—reducing the system to equations for h(r) and f(r) and then checking the remaining equations—is coherent, and the claimed direct substitution checks give some confidence that the displayed functions are local solutions. However, the central physical claim, absence of a curvature singularity, is not supported: the singular locus is the point where h(r)=0, not r=0, and the curvature diverges there. The paper therefore does not establish regular black holes; at best it presents local exact solutions in a chart that excludes the singular locus.

Major objections (2)

[Section 3.1, Eqs. (3.14), (3.16), (3.26)-(3.32)] The regularity argument is invalid because r=0 is not a geometric origin of this metric. From Eq. (3.14), h(r)=(C1 r+2C2)^2/(4C2), so the transverse R^2 fibers collapse at y=C1 r+2C2=0, while f(r)=C4-C3/[C1 y] from Eq. (3.16) diverges there. The Ricci scalar in Eq. (3.30) has denominator (2αβC2+b^2 r C3)^2, which is proportional to y^2 in the simplified branch, so R~y^{-2} near y=0. Thus there is a genuine curvature singularity at y=0. In the branch plotted in Fig. 1 (α=β=b=C2=1, C3=-1) this point lies at r=-2, which is outside the displayed r>0 domain but is a regular interior point of the coordinate chart; the coordinate r can be continued through r=0 to reach it. In the positive-parameter branch of Eq. (3.23) the singular point lies at negative r as well. Finiteness of R and K at r=0, Eqs. (3.31)-(3.32), only probes an interior point. The same objection applies to the Λ-case in Section 4.1, where the pole term is present in Eq. (4.34) and the stated positivity of 2αβC2+b^2 r C3 for r≥0 does not exclude the singularity in the extended spacetime. Consequently, the claims that 'the central curvature singularity is absent' and that the solution is a 'regular planar black hole' are not supported.
[Section 3.1, Eqs. (3.23), (3.29), Fig. 1] The parameter branch that actually has a horizon in r>0 is not covered by the stated reality conditions. For positive α, β, and C3, the conditions in Eq. (3.23) hold, but the horizon radius in Eq. (3.29) is r_h=-[(4+b^2)β^2+2b^2αβC2]/(b^4 C3), which is negative. The example in Fig. 1 uses β=C3=-1 to obtain r_h=3, i.e. it lies outside the domain for which the reality of b_r(r) was proved. For that branch the positivity of the expression in Eq. (3.24) can be checked by hand because the cross term vanishes, but the paper does not state this. As written, therefore, the coexistence of a real radial bumblebee field and a positive horizon radius is not established by the text.

Minor objections (5)

[Section 3, Eqs. (3.14), (3.25), (3.27)] There is a factor mismatch in the displayed solution: with C1=b^2 C3/(2αβ), Eq. (3.14) gives h(r)=(b^2 r C3+4αβC2)^2/(16α^2β^2C2), while Eq. (3.27) gives (2αβC2+b^2 r C3)^2/(4α^2β^2C2). The values used in Fig. 1 correspond to C1=b^2 C3/(αβ). This factor should be corrected and the subsequent formulas re-verified.
[Section 3.1, after Eq. (3.29)] The expression for f'(r_h) is typeset in a corrupt form ('f′(rh) = b4α2β2C3(−4β2−b2β2)2') and cannot be checked as printed; the sign and nonzero condition should be written explicitly.
[Section 4.1, Eq. (4.38)] The displayed limit of the Kretschmann scalar is unreadable in the submitted form; it should be typeset in a way that allows the claimed finiteness to be verified.
[Abstract and Conclusions] There are grammatical errors in the abstract and conclusions ('Found solution produce regular planar black hole', 'This solutions free of singularities', 'can supports planar geometries') that should be corrected.
[Section 3.1 and 5] The asymptotic structure of the solutions is not discussed; for the no-Λ case f(r) tends to the negative constant -α^2/(4+b^2), so the interpretation of the solution as a black hole, rather than a local solution with a cosmological-type horizon, needs clarification.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

The paper derives two exact families of planar black holes in bumblebee gravity and concludes, from finite Ricci and Kretschmann scalars at the origin, that the central curvature singularity is absent.

The reading

The paper claims two new exact families of planar black holes in bumblebee gravity, a theory in which a vector field spontaneously breaks Lorentz symmetry. In both families the bumblebee field carries temporal and radial components, and solving the field equations fixes the nonminimal coupling to $\xi = 1/4$ and ties the cosmological constant to the potential parameter. The Ricci and Kretschmann scalars stay finite as $r \to 0$, which the paper takes to mean the central curvature singularity is absent, and the horizons exhibited are nonextremal. If correct, this shows that a Lorentz-violating vector field alone, without additional matter, can support singularity-free black-hole geometries in planar symmetry.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the bumblebee ansatz $B_\mu = (b_t(r), b_r(r), 0, 0)$ together with the vacuum constraint $B^\mu B_\mu = b^2$, which eliminates the radial component in favour of the temporal component and the blackening function. Feeding this into the field equations, the radial bumblebee equation combined with the difference $E_{tt}-E_{rr}$ reduces the system to the single equation $2h h'' - (h')^2 = 0$, whose solution is the planar deformation function $h(r) = (C_1 r + 2C_2)^2/(4C_2)$. The remaining equations then determine the blackening function $f(r)$, the temporal component $b_t(r) = \alpha + \beta/(C_1 r + 2C_2)$, and the constraint $(4\xi-1)\beta^2 = 0$, which fixes the nonminimal coupling to $\xi = 1/4$ whenever $b_t$ is not constant. Regularity is carried by the explicit limits of the Ricci and Kretschmann scalars at $r = 0$.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated after Eq. (3.32), is that the solution (3.26) describes a regular planar black hole obtained in bumblebee gravity, and the conclusions go further: nonminimally coupled Lorentz-violating vector fields or pure bumblebee fields can support planar geometries without a central scalar-curvature singularity. Two closed-form families are presented, one with a quadratic potential and zero cosmological constant and one with a linear potential whose parameter $\lambda < 0$ produces an effective negative cosmological constant $\Lambda = (4+b^2)\lambda/2$. In both, the planar deformation function is $h(r) = (C_1 r + 2C_2)^2/(4C_2)$, the blackening function is given analytically, and a nonconstant temporal bumblebee component forces $\xi = 1/4$. Regularity is argued from the explicit $r \to 0$ limits of the Ricci and Kretschmann invariants, both finite for nonvanishing parameters, and each family admits a nonextremal horizon; the no-cosmological-constant case has a finite positive $f(0)$ and a cosmological-type horizon, resembling a de Sitter static patch around a regular core.

Load-bearing premise

The regularity claim rests on treating finiteness of the Ricci and Kretschmann scalars at $r = 0$ as a complete test for the absence of a central curvature singularity, and on assuming the horizon-bearing parameter branch keeps the radial bumblebee component real even though the proven reality conditions were derived for parameters that put the horizon at negative $r$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Bumblebee gravity is shown to admit singularity-free planar black holes with no matter beyond the Lorentz-violating vector field, so Lorentz-symmetry breaking by itself can remove the central curvature singularity in these geometries.
The nonminimal coupling is not a free parameter in these families: any nonconstant temporal bumblebee component forces $\xi = 1/4$ in both the quadratic- and linear-potential cases.
The solution without a cosmological constant has a finite, positive $f(0)$ and a single cosmological-type horizon, so its static core resembles a de Sitter patch rather than a singular point.
In the linear-potential family, the physical branch requires $\lambda < 0$, which yields a negative effective cosmological constant and a unique nonextremal horizon for the stated parameter range.
Thermodynamics and linear stability are not analysed in the paper and remain open questions for these solutions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The regularity verdict is not tested by geodesic completeness: a stricter check, not performed here, would be boundedness of all Riemann components in a frame parallel-propagated along radial geodesics through $r = 0$.
In the no-cosmological-constant family, the horizon-bearing example shown in Fig. 1 uses $\beta = C_3 = -1$, outside the range where the reality of $b_r(r)$ was proven, so whether the radial bumblebee component stays real on that branch is open.
A natural testable extension is the $\beta = 0$ branch, where the condition $(4\xi-1)\beta^2 = 0$ no longer fixes $\xi$, so regular planar cores with a free nonminimal coupling may exist.
The same $\xi = 1/4$ mechanism could be probed in spherical or cylindrical symmetry to see whether the singularity removal is a planar artefact or a general property of the nonminimally coupled bumblebee field.

Original abstract

We discuss possibilities of finding exact regular planar black hole solutions in bumblebee gravity with temporal and radial components of the bumblebee field. We consider quadratic and linear potentials, with vanishing and nonzero cosmological constants, respectively. The field equations determine the nonminimal coupling and the relations between the model parameters. Found solution produce regular planar black hole with planar deformation function. Analytical expressions for this functions has been found. This solutions free of singularities at the $r=0$.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-11-04: 1 request, 4,693 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We discuss possibilities of finding exact regular planar black hole solutions in bumblebee gravity with temporal and radial components of the bumblebee field. We consider quadratic and linear potentials, with vanishing and nonzero cosmological constants, respectively. The field equations determine the nonminimal coupling and the relations between the model parameters. Found solution produce regular planar black hole with planar deformation function. Analytical expressions for this functions has been found. This solutions free of singularities at the $r=0$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We discuss possibilities of finding exact regular planar black hole solutions in bumblebee gravity with temporal and radial components of the bumblebee field.	contribution 0.92	0.62	0.11	hedged possibility 0.96
s1	We consider quadratic and linear potentials, with vanishing and nonzero cosmological constants, respectively.	method 0.86	0.76	0.04	asserted 0.91
s2	The field equations determine the nonminimal coupling and the relations between the model parameters.	method 0.61	0.68	0.10	asserted 1.00
s3	Found solution produce regular planar black hole with planar deformation function.	result 0.99	0.94	0.65	asserted 1.00
s4	Analytical expressions for this functions has been found.	result 0.85	0.92	0.09	asserted 1.00
s5	This solutions free of singularities at the $r=0$.	result 0.99	0.84	0.34	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** The blackening function for α = b = C2 = 1 and β = C3 = −1. The green point denotes r = 0, while the red point denotes the horizon r = rh = 3. The blackening function is finite at r = 0 and vanishes at rh = 3. It is positive for 0 ≤ r < rh and negative for r > rh. The finite positive value of f(r) at r = 0 indicates a regular static core. This behavior is similar to that of the de Sitter static patch: the blackening function is positive at r = 0 and vanishes at a finite cosmological-type horizon. 4 Planar black hole with cosmological constant In this section we consider the action (2

Figures reproduced from arXiv:2611.03338 by the authors.

References

Works cited (56)

[14]

Q. G. Bailey, H. S. Murray and D. T. Walter-Cardona, “Bumblebee gravity: Spherically symmetric solutions away from the potential minimum,” Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) no.2, 024069 doi:10.1103/nkbj-vbjf [arXiv:2503.10998 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith arXiv 2025
[23]

Z. C. Li and H. L¨ u, “When Bumblebee Meets NLED: Lorentz-violating black holes and regular spacetimes,” [arXiv:2605.13963 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[1]

V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, “Spontaneous Breaking of Lorentz Symmetry in String Theory,” Phys. Rev. D39(1989), 683 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.39.683

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevd.39.683 1989
[2]

D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecky, “Lorentz violating extension of the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D58(1998), 116002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.116002 [arXiv:hep-ph/9809521 [hep-ph]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[3]

V. A. Kostelecky, “Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D 69(2004), 105009 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.105009 [arXiv:hep-th/0312310 [hep-th]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[4]

O. Bertolami and J. Paramos, “The Flight of the bumblebee: Vacuum solutions of a gravity model with vector-induced spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking,” Phys. Rev. D72(2005), 044001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.044001 [arXiv:hep-th/0504215 [hep-th]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[5]

V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, “Gravitational Phenomenology in Higher Dimensional Theories and Strings,” Phys. Rev. D40(1989), 1886–1903 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.40.1886

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevd.40.1886 1989
[6]

R. Casana, A. Cavalcante, F. P. Poulis and E. B. Santos, “Exact Schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity model,” Phys. Rev. D97(2018) no.10, 104001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104001 [arXiv:1711.02273 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[7]

A. ¨Ovg¨ un, K. Jusufi and˙I. Sakallı, “Exact traversable wormhole solution in bumblebee gravity,” Phys. Rev. D99(2019) no.2, 024042 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.024042 [arXiv:1804.09911 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[8]

R. V. Maluf and J. C. S. Neves, “Black holes with a cosmological constant in bumblebee gravity,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.4, 044002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044002 [arXiv:2011.12841 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[9]

C. Ding, C. Liu, R. Casana and A. Cavalcante, “Exact Kerr-like solution and its shadow in a gravity model with spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking,” Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) no.3, 178 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7743-y [arXiv:1910.02674 [gr-qc]]. – 15 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[10]

R. Xu, D. Liang and L. Shao, “Static spherical vacuum solutions in the bumblebee gravity model,” Phys. Rev. D107(2023) no.2, 024011 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.024011 [arXiv:2209.02209 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[11]

C. Ding, Y. Shi, J. Chen, Y. Zhou, C. Liu and Y. Xiao, “Rotating BTZ-like black hole and central charges in Einstein-bumblebee gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) no.7, 573 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11761-y [arXiv:2302.01580 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[12]

˙I. G¨ ull¨ u and A.¨Ovg¨ un, “Schwarzschild-like black hole with a topological defect in bumblebee gravity,” Annals Phys.436(2022), 168721 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2021.168721 [arXiv:2012.02611 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[13]

Z. F. Mai, R. Xu, D. Liang and L. Shao, “Extended thermodynamics of the bumblebee black holes,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.2, 024004 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024004 [arXiv:2304.08030 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[15]

J. Z. Liu, W. D. Guo, S. W. Wei and Y. X. Liu, “Charged spherically symmetric and slowly rotating charged black hole solutions in bumblebee gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025) no.2, 145 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13859-x [arXiv:2407.08396 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[16]

J. Z. Liu, S. P. Wu, S. W. Wei and Y. X. Liu, “Exact black hole solutions in bumblebee gravity with lightlike or spacelike VEVs,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 69(2026) no.7, 270411 doi:10.1007/s11433-026-2961-8 [arXiv:2510.16731 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026
[17]

C. Ding, X. Chen and X. Fu, “Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity coupled to bumblebee field in four dimensional spacetime,” Nucl. Phys. B975(2022), 115688 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115688 [arXiv:2102.13335 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[18]

A. Ditta, T. Xia, R. Ali and A. Mahmood, “Thermal stability of black hole in bumblebee gravity with cosmological constant,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A38(2023) no.24, 2350093 doi:10.1142/S0217751X23500938

View on Pith doi:10.1142/s0217751x23500938 2023
[19]

H. F. Ding, “Conserved charges and asymptotic symmetries of BTZ-like black holes in Einstein-bumblebee gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.8, 831 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14562-7 [arXiv:2504.13985 [hep-th]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[20]

S. Li, L. Liang and L. Ma, “Dyonic RN-like and Taub–NUT-like black holes in Einstein–bumblebee gravity,” JCAP03(2026), 005 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/005 [arXiv:2510.04405 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith arXiv 2026
[21]

Y. Sekhmani, S. K. Maurya, J. Rayimbaev, M. Altanji, I. Ibragimov and S. Muminov, “Exact static and slowly rotating phantom conformal nonlinear-electrodynamic black – 16 – holes in Bumblebee gravity with Lorentz Violation and shadow phenomenology,” Phys. Dark Univ.50(2025), 102116 doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.102116

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.102116 2025
[22]

M. Khodadi and J. T. Firouzjaee, “Primordial black hole in Lorentz-violating theories: Insights from Bumblebee gravity,” [arXiv:2607.07011 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[24]

B. Eslam Panah, A. Guvendi, S. Gurtas Dogan and O. Mustafa, “Optical and thermodynamic signatures of Lorentz symmetry breaking in bumblebee AdS black holes,” Chin. J. Phys.103(2026), 1698–1713 doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2026.07.024 [arXiv:2607.15827 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026
[25]

J. Yang, Z. F. Mai, D. Liang and L. Shao, “Asymptotically-flat black holes in bumblebee gravity: Exact solutions and thermodynamics,” [arXiv:2606.05801 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[26]

J. Zhu and H. Li, “New exact vacuum solutions in extended bumblebee gravity,” [arXiv:2604.09464 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[27]

L. A. Lessa and J. E. G. Silva, “Einstein–Bumblebee-dilaton black hole solution,” Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) no.11, 1035 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12201-7 [arXiv:2308.14646 [hep-th]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[28]

L. A. Lessa and J. E. G. Silva, “Einstein–Bumblebee-dilaton black hole in Lifshitz spacetimes,” Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) no.2, 194 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12576-1 [arXiv:2309.07269 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[29]

J. M. Bardeen, “Non-singular general-relativistic gravitational collapse,” in Abstracts of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity, Tbilisi University Press, Tbilisi (1968), 174-175

View on Pith 1968
[30]

V. P. Frolov, M. A. Markov and V. F. Mukhanov, “Through a black hole into a new universe?,” Phys. Lett. B216(1989), 272-276 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)91114-3

View on Pith doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)91114-3 1989
[31]

V. P. Frolov, M. A. Markov and V. F. Mukhanov, “Black Holes as Possible Sources of Closed and Semiclosed Worlds,” Phys. Rev. D41(1990), 383 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.41.383

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevd.41.383 1990
[32]

S. A. Hayward, “Formation and evaporation of regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(2006), 031103 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.031103 [arXiv:gr-qc/0506126 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006
[33]

V. P. Frolov, “Information loss problem and a ‘black hole’ model with a closed apparent horizon,” JHEP05(2014), 049 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2014)049 [arXiv:1402.5446 [hep-th]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014
[34]

V. P. Frolov, “Notes on nonsingular models of black holes,” Phys. Rev. D94(2016) no.10, 104056 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.104056 [arXiv:1609.01758 [gr-qc]]. – 17 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[35]

V. P. Frolov and A. Zelnikov, “Quantum radiation from an evaporating nonsingular black hole,” Phys. Rev. D95(2017) no.12, 124028 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124028 [arXiv:1704.03043 [hep-th]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[36]

R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, C. Pacilio and M. Visser, “On the viability of regular black holes,” JHEP07(2018), 023 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)023 [arXiv:1805.02675 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[37]

A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Black-bounce to traversable wormhole,” JCAP02(2019), 042 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/042 [arXiv:1812.07114 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[38]

A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Regular black holes with asymptotically Minkowski cores,” Universe6(2019) no.1, 8 doi:10.3390/universe6010008 [arXiv:1911.01020 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[39]

A. Simpson and M. Visser, “The eye of the storm: a regular Kerr black hole,” JCAP 03(2022) no.03, 011 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/03/011 [arXiv:2111.12329 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[40]

E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, “Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998), 5056-5059 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5056 [arXiv:gr-qc/9911046 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[41]

E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, “The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole,” Phys. Lett. B493(2000), 149-152 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01125-4 [arXiv:gr-qc/0009077 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[42]

K. A. Bronnikov, “Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D63(2001), 044005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.044005 [arXiv:gr-qc/0006014 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[43]

P. Bueno, P. A. Cano and R. A. Hennigar, “Regular black holes from pure gravity,” Phys. Lett. B861(2025), 139260 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139260 [arXiv:2403.04827 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[44]

V. P. Frolov, A. Koek, J. P. Soto and A. Zelnikov, “Regular black holes inspired by quasitopological gravity,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.4, 044034 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.044034 [arXiv:2411.16050 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[45]

R. Tsuda, R. Suzuki and S. Tomizawa, “Fan-Wang type regular black holes in quasitopological gravity,” Phys. Rev. D114(2026) no.2, 024001 doi:10.1103/q4kl-6d3z [arXiv:2602.16754 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith arXiv 2026
[46]

P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar and ´A. J. Murcia, “Regular black hole formation in four-dimensional nonpolynomial gravities,” Phys. Rev. D113(2026) no.2, 024019 doi:10.1103/8f3j-zcxh [arXiv:2509.19016 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith arXiv 2026
[47]

A. Coll´ eaux, “Rational regular black holes in non-polynomial gravity,” [arXiv:2608.17158 [gr-qc]]. – 18 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[48]

J. Z. Liu, S. W. Wei and Y. X. Liu, “An asymptotically conical regular black hole in four-dimensional nonpolynomial quasitopological gravity,” [arXiv:2610.35248 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[49]

K. A. Bronnikov and J. C. Fabris, “Regular phantom black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006), 251101 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.251101 [arXiv:gr-qc/0511109 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006
[50]

C. Lan, H. Yang, Y. Guo and Y. G. Miao, “Regular Black Holes: A Short Topic Review,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.62(2023) no.9, 202 doi:10.1007/s10773-023-05454-1 [arXiv:2303.11696 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[51]

A. Kumar, D. V. Singh and S. Upadhyay, “Impact of Perfect Fluid Dark Matter on the Thermodynamics of AdS Ay´ on-Beato-Garc ´ ıa Black Holes,” JHAP4(2024) no.4, 85-99 doi:10.22128/jhap.2024.884.1096 [arXiv:2503.04805 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[52]

R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, M. Visser, J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, A. Bonanno, J. Borissova, V. Boyanov and V. Cardoso,et al., “Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics,” JCAP05(2025), 003 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/05/003 [arXiv:2501.05505 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[53]

P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar and ´A. J. Murcia, “Dynamical Formation of Regular Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) no.18, 181401 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.181401 [arXiv:2412.02742 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[54]

P. G. S. Fernandes, “Regular BTZ black holes from an infinite tower of corrections,” Phys. Lett. B868(2025), 139772 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139772 [arXiv:2504.08565 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[55]

Z. Zhu, A. S. Koshelev, Y. Liu and A. Tokareva, “Energy conditions for regular black holes in EFT of gravity,” [arXiv:2508.15745 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[56]

C. Shao, J. Q. Guo, Y. Tian and H. Zhang, “Internal structure of Hayward black holes,” Phys. Rev. D113(2026) no.12, 124040 doi:10.1103/qyyr-df8v [arXiv:2511.23165 [gr-qc]]. – 19 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [14]

Q. G. Bailey, H. S. Murray and D. T. Walter-Cardona, “Bumblebee gravity: Spherically symmetric solutions away from the potential minimum,” Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) no.2, 024069 doi:10.1103/nkbj-vbjf [arXiv:2503.10998 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith arXiv 2025

[2] [23]

Z. C. Li and H. L¨ u, “When Bumblebee Meets NLED: Lorentz-violating black holes and regular spacetimes,” [arXiv:2605.13963 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[3] [1]

V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, “Spontaneous Breaking of Lorentz Symmetry in String Theory,” Phys. Rev. D39(1989), 683 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.39.683

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevd.39.683 1989

[4] [2]

D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecky, “Lorentz violating extension of the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D58(1998), 116002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.116002 [arXiv:hep-ph/9809521 [hep-ph]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[5] [3]

V. A. Kostelecky, “Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D 69(2004), 105009 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.105009 [arXiv:hep-th/0312310 [hep-th]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[6] [4]

O. Bertolami and J. Paramos, “The Flight of the bumblebee: Vacuum solutions of a gravity model with vector-induced spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking,” Phys. Rev. D72(2005), 044001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.044001 [arXiv:hep-th/0504215 [hep-th]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[7] [5]

V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, “Gravitational Phenomenology in Higher Dimensional Theories and Strings,” Phys. Rev. D40(1989), 1886–1903 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.40.1886

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevd.40.1886 1989

[8] [6]

R. Casana, A. Cavalcante, F. P. Poulis and E. B. Santos, “Exact Schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity model,” Phys. Rev. D97(2018) no.10, 104001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104001 [arXiv:1711.02273 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[9] [7]

A. ¨Ovg¨ un, K. Jusufi and˙I. Sakallı, “Exact traversable wormhole solution in bumblebee gravity,” Phys. Rev. D99(2019) no.2, 024042 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.024042 [arXiv:1804.09911 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[10] [8]

R. V. Maluf and J. C. S. Neves, “Black holes with a cosmological constant in bumblebee gravity,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.4, 044002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044002 [arXiv:2011.12841 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[11] [9]

C. Ding, C. Liu, R. Casana and A. Cavalcante, “Exact Kerr-like solution and its shadow in a gravity model with spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking,” Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) no.3, 178 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7743-y [arXiv:1910.02674 [gr-qc]]. – 15 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[12] [10]

R. Xu, D. Liang and L. Shao, “Static spherical vacuum solutions in the bumblebee gravity model,” Phys. Rev. D107(2023) no.2, 024011 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.024011 [arXiv:2209.02209 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[13] [11]

C. Ding, Y. Shi, J. Chen, Y. Zhou, C. Liu and Y. Xiao, “Rotating BTZ-like black hole and central charges in Einstein-bumblebee gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) no.7, 573 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11761-y [arXiv:2302.01580 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[14] [12]

˙I. G¨ ull¨ u and A.¨Ovg¨ un, “Schwarzschild-like black hole with a topological defect in bumblebee gravity,” Annals Phys.436(2022), 168721 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2021.168721 [arXiv:2012.02611 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[15] [13]

Z. F. Mai, R. Xu, D. Liang and L. Shao, “Extended thermodynamics of the bumblebee black holes,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.2, 024004 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024004 [arXiv:2304.08030 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[16] [15]

J. Z. Liu, W. D. Guo, S. W. Wei and Y. X. Liu, “Charged spherically symmetric and slowly rotating charged black hole solutions in bumblebee gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025) no.2, 145 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13859-x [arXiv:2407.08396 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[17] [16]

J. Z. Liu, S. P. Wu, S. W. Wei and Y. X. Liu, “Exact black hole solutions in bumblebee gravity with lightlike or spacelike VEVs,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 69(2026) no.7, 270411 doi:10.1007/s11433-026-2961-8 [arXiv:2510.16731 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026

[18] [17]

C. Ding, X. Chen and X. Fu, “Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity coupled to bumblebee field in four dimensional spacetime,” Nucl. Phys. B975(2022), 115688 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115688 [arXiv:2102.13335 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[19] [18]

A. Ditta, T. Xia, R. Ali and A. Mahmood, “Thermal stability of black hole in bumblebee gravity with cosmological constant,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A38(2023) no.24, 2350093 doi:10.1142/S0217751X23500938

View on Pith doi:10.1142/s0217751x23500938 2023

[20] [19]

H. F. Ding, “Conserved charges and asymptotic symmetries of BTZ-like black holes in Einstein-bumblebee gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.8, 831 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14562-7 [arXiv:2504.13985 [hep-th]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[21] [20]

S. Li, L. Liang and L. Ma, “Dyonic RN-like and Taub–NUT-like black holes in Einstein–bumblebee gravity,” JCAP03(2026), 005 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/005 [arXiv:2510.04405 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith arXiv 2026

[22] [21]

Y. Sekhmani, S. K. Maurya, J. Rayimbaev, M. Altanji, I. Ibragimov and S. Muminov, “Exact static and slowly rotating phantom conformal nonlinear-electrodynamic black – 16 – holes in Bumblebee gravity with Lorentz Violation and shadow phenomenology,” Phys. Dark Univ.50(2025), 102116 doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.102116

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.102116 2025

[23] [22]

M. Khodadi and J. T. Firouzjaee, “Primordial black hole in Lorentz-violating theories: Insights from Bumblebee gravity,” [arXiv:2607.07011 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[24] [24]

B. Eslam Panah, A. Guvendi, S. Gurtas Dogan and O. Mustafa, “Optical and thermodynamic signatures of Lorentz symmetry breaking in bumblebee AdS black holes,” Chin. J. Phys.103(2026), 1698–1713 doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2026.07.024 [arXiv:2607.15827 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026

[25] [25]

J. Yang, Z. F. Mai, D. Liang and L. Shao, “Asymptotically-flat black holes in bumblebee gravity: Exact solutions and thermodynamics,” [arXiv:2606.05801 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[26] [26]

J. Zhu and H. Li, “New exact vacuum solutions in extended bumblebee gravity,” [arXiv:2604.09464 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[27] [27]

L. A. Lessa and J. E. G. Silva, “Einstein–Bumblebee-dilaton black hole solution,” Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) no.11, 1035 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12201-7 [arXiv:2308.14646 [hep-th]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[28] [28]

L. A. Lessa and J. E. G. Silva, “Einstein–Bumblebee-dilaton black hole in Lifshitz spacetimes,” Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) no.2, 194 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12576-1 [arXiv:2309.07269 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[29] [29]

J. M. Bardeen, “Non-singular general-relativistic gravitational collapse,” in Abstracts of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity, Tbilisi University Press, Tbilisi (1968), 174-175

View on Pith 1968

[30] [30]

V. P. Frolov, M. A. Markov and V. F. Mukhanov, “Through a black hole into a new universe?,” Phys. Lett. B216(1989), 272-276 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)91114-3

View on Pith doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)91114-3 1989

[31] [31]

V. P. Frolov, M. A. Markov and V. F. Mukhanov, “Black Holes as Possible Sources of Closed and Semiclosed Worlds,” Phys. Rev. D41(1990), 383 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.41.383

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevd.41.383 1990

[32] [32]

S. A. Hayward, “Formation and evaporation of regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(2006), 031103 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.031103 [arXiv:gr-qc/0506126 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006

[33] [33]

V. P. Frolov, “Information loss problem and a ‘black hole’ model with a closed apparent horizon,” JHEP05(2014), 049 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2014)049 [arXiv:1402.5446 [hep-th]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014

[34] [34]

V. P. Frolov, “Notes on nonsingular models of black holes,” Phys. Rev. D94(2016) no.10, 104056 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.104056 [arXiv:1609.01758 [gr-qc]]. – 17 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[35] [35]

V. P. Frolov and A. Zelnikov, “Quantum radiation from an evaporating nonsingular black hole,” Phys. Rev. D95(2017) no.12, 124028 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124028 [arXiv:1704.03043 [hep-th]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[36] [36]

R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, C. Pacilio and M. Visser, “On the viability of regular black holes,” JHEP07(2018), 023 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)023 [arXiv:1805.02675 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[37] [37]

A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Black-bounce to traversable wormhole,” JCAP02(2019), 042 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/042 [arXiv:1812.07114 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[38] [38]

A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Regular black holes with asymptotically Minkowski cores,” Universe6(2019) no.1, 8 doi:10.3390/universe6010008 [arXiv:1911.01020 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[39] [39]

A. Simpson and M. Visser, “The eye of the storm: a regular Kerr black hole,” JCAP 03(2022) no.03, 011 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/03/011 [arXiv:2111.12329 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[40] [40]

E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, “Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998), 5056-5059 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5056 [arXiv:gr-qc/9911046 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[41] [41]

E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, “The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole,” Phys. Lett. B493(2000), 149-152 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01125-4 [arXiv:gr-qc/0009077 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[42] [42]

K. A. Bronnikov, “Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D63(2001), 044005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.044005 [arXiv:gr-qc/0006014 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[43] [43]

P. Bueno, P. A. Cano and R. A. Hennigar, “Regular black holes from pure gravity,” Phys. Lett. B861(2025), 139260 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139260 [arXiv:2403.04827 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[44] [44]

V. P. Frolov, A. Koek, J. P. Soto and A. Zelnikov, “Regular black holes inspired by quasitopological gravity,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.4, 044034 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.044034 [arXiv:2411.16050 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[45] [45]

R. Tsuda, R. Suzuki and S. Tomizawa, “Fan-Wang type regular black holes in quasitopological gravity,” Phys. Rev. D114(2026) no.2, 024001 doi:10.1103/q4kl-6d3z [arXiv:2602.16754 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith arXiv 2026

[46] [46]

P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar and ´A. J. Murcia, “Regular black hole formation in four-dimensional nonpolynomial gravities,” Phys. Rev. D113(2026) no.2, 024019 doi:10.1103/8f3j-zcxh [arXiv:2509.19016 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith arXiv 2026

[47] [47]

A. Coll´ eaux, “Rational regular black holes in non-polynomial gravity,” [arXiv:2608.17158 [gr-qc]]. – 18 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[48] [48]

J. Z. Liu, S. W. Wei and Y. X. Liu, “An asymptotically conical regular black hole in four-dimensional nonpolynomial quasitopological gravity,” [arXiv:2610.35248 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[49] [49]

K. A. Bronnikov and J. C. Fabris, “Regular phantom black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006), 251101 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.251101 [arXiv:gr-qc/0511109 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006

[50] [50]

C. Lan, H. Yang, Y. Guo and Y. G. Miao, “Regular Black Holes: A Short Topic Review,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.62(2023) no.9, 202 doi:10.1007/s10773-023-05454-1 [arXiv:2303.11696 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[51] [51]

A. Kumar, D. V. Singh and S. Upadhyay, “Impact of Perfect Fluid Dark Matter on the Thermodynamics of AdS Ay´ on-Beato-Garc ´ ıa Black Holes,” JHAP4(2024) no.4, 85-99 doi:10.22128/jhap.2024.884.1096 [arXiv:2503.04805 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[52] [52]

R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, M. Visser, J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o, A. Bonanno, J. Borissova, V. Boyanov and V. Cardoso,et al., “Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics,” JCAP05(2025), 003 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/05/003 [arXiv:2501.05505 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[53] [53]

P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar and ´A. J. Murcia, “Dynamical Formation of Regular Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) no.18, 181401 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.181401 [arXiv:2412.02742 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[54] [54]

P. G. S. Fernandes, “Regular BTZ black holes from an infinite tower of corrections,” Phys. Lett. B868(2025), 139772 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139772 [arXiv:2504.08565 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[55] [55]

Z. Zhu, A. S. Koshelev, Y. Liu and A. Tokareva, “Energy conditions for regular black holes in EFT of gravity,” [arXiv:2508.15745 [gr-qc]]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[56] [56]

C. Shao, J. Q. Guo, Y. Tian and H. Zhang, “Internal structure of Hayward black holes,” Phys. Rev. D113(2026) no.12, 124040 doi:10.1103/qyyr-df8v [arXiv:2511.23165 [gr-qc]]. – 19 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026