pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00439 · v1 · pith:2GBN7WFKnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · ✦ hep-ph

Sub-eikonal stress and model dependence of the small-x gluon D-term

Lei Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 10:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords small-x gluonD-termdipole amplitudeeikonal approximationenergy-momentum tensorsaturationsub-eikonal fields
0
0 comments X

The pith

The leading small-x dipole alone cannot fix the sign of the gluon D-term.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the gluon momentum form factor A_g(t) is captured by the leading-eikonal dipole, yet the stress form factor C_g(t) that enters the D-term is not. In a Drell-Yan frame the relevant projection comes from the transverse traceless stress T_g^{ij}, which first appears through next-to-eikonal fields. The authors construct gauge-invariant stress-decorated Wilson lines, match them at tree level to the local energy-momentum tensor, and obtain an operator-level statement that neither the ordinary dipole S_x(b_⊥,r_⊥) nor any saturation profile Q_s^2(x,b) suffices to determine the sign of D_g. They then exhibit an explicit finite-correlation response model that produces a negative forward D-term together with the expected core-shell pressure distribution.

Core claim

The ordinary dipole S_x(b_⊥,r_⊥), or a saturation profile Q_s^2(x,b), does not by itself determine the sign of the small-x gluon D-term. The reason is kinematic and operatorial: A_g(t) is projected by T_g^{++} while C_g(t) is projected by the symmetric-traceless transverse stress T_g^{ij}, which requires sub-eikonal target fields represented by stress-decorated Wilson lines containing F^{i-}, F^{ij} or equivalent.

What carries the argument

stress-decorated Wilson lines containing F^{i-} or F^{ij} that match at tree level to the local energy-momentum tensor and thereby isolate the next-to-eikonal stress projection

If this is right

  • The gluon D-term is a next-to-eikonal stress probe rather than a universal leading-eikonal saturation observable.
  • Within the anti-aligned response class where F^{i-} = -ε R_NE F^{i+}, one obtains Λ_NE > 0 and therefore D_g(0) < 0.
  • Gaussian, Woods-Saxon, power-edge and MV-inspired profiles all produce a stable negative forward D-term together with a core-shell pressure pattern.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Other higher-twist gluon form factors that also involve transverse stress projections may likewise require explicit sub-eikonal modeling.
  • The sign of the D-term could be used as a diagnostic to distinguish between different classes of sub-eikonal response kernels in phenomenological fits.

Load-bearing premise

The tree-level matching of the constructed stress-decorated Wilson line operator to the local energy-momentum tensor is valid and sufficient to establish the operator-level no-go.

What would settle it

A calculation or lattice measurement that extracts the sign of the small-x gluon D-term from the leading dipole amplitude alone, without any sub-eikonal stress contribution.

read the original abstract

The leading-eikonal small-$x$ dipole gives a compact representation of the gluon momentum form factor $A_g(t)$. We show that the same information is not sufficient to determine the gluon stress form factor $C_g(t)$, and hence the gluon D-term. The reason is kinematic and operatorial: in a Drell-Yan frame $A_g(t)$ is projected by $T_g^{++}$, whereas $C_g(t)$ is projected by the symmetric-traceless transverse stress $T_g^{ij}$. This stress projection first appears through next-to-eikonal fields and is represented by gauge-invariant stress-decorated Wilson lines containing $F^{i-}$, $F^{ij}$, or equivalent sub-eikonal target fields. We construct this operator and match it to the local energy-momentum tensor at tree level, obtaining an operator-level no-go statement: the ordinary dipole $S_x(b_\perp,r_\perp)$, or a saturation profile $Q_s^2(x,b)$, does not by itself determine the sign of the small-$x$ gluon D-term. We then give a finite-correlation response model in which a positive kernel generates an anti-aligned response $F^{i-}=-\epsilon R_{\rm NE}F^{i+}$, so that $\Lambda_{\rm NE}>0$ and $D_g(0)<0$ within that response class. A Gaussian benchmark and numerical scans over Gaussian, Woods-Saxon, power-edge, and McLerran-Venugopalan (MV)-inspired profiles show a stable negative forward D-term for this anti-aligned model, together with the expected core-shell pressure pattern. The gluon D-term is therefore a next-to-eikonal stress probe, not a universal leading-eikonal saturation observable.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the leading-eikonal small-x dipole determines the gluon momentum form factor A_g(t) but is insufficient to fix the gluon stress form factor C_g(t) or the D-term, because A_g is projected by T_g^{++} while C_g is projected by the symmetric-traceless transverse stress T_g^{ij}. It constructs gauge-invariant stress-decorated Wilson lines containing sub-eikonal fields (F^{i-}, F^{ij}), matches them at tree level to the local EMT, and obtains an operator-level no-go: the ordinary dipole S_x(b_⊥,r_⊥) or saturation profile Q_s^2(x,b) does not determine the sign of the small-x gluon D-term. Within a finite-correlation response model that imposes an anti-aligned response F^{i-}=-ε R_NE F^{i+}, the paper reports a stable negative D_g(0) together with the expected core-shell pressure pattern across several profile choices.

Significance. If the operator construction and matching are robust, the result clarifies that the gluon D-term is a next-to-eikonal observable rather than a universal leading-eikonal saturation quantity, with direct implications for small-x GPD phenomenology. The explicit numerical demonstration of stability for the chosen response class across Gaussian, Woods-Saxon, power-edge, and MV-inspired profiles is a concrete strength that can be used for further modeling.

major comments (2)
  1. [operator construction and matching] The tree-level matching of the stress-decorated Wilson line to the local EMT (paragraph on operator construction and matching) is presented as sufficient to establish the operator-level no-go separating the A_g and C_g projections. It is not shown whether this matching captures possible sub-leading operator mixing, gauge artifacts, or reproduces the precise kinematic factor for C_g(t) when the operator is sandwiched between states; if any of these elements are incomplete, the claimed generality of the no-go does not follow.
  2. [response model] The negative sign of D_g(0) is generated inside the specific anti-aligned response class F^{i-}=-ε R_NE F^{i+} with Λ_NE>0. While the paper correctly emphasizes model dependence, the operator no-go statement is therefore tied to this modeling assumption rather than being independent of it; the numerical stability is shown only within that class.
minor comments (1)
  1. The numerical scans over the four profile families should include explicit parameter tables or supplementary material so that the stability of the negative D_g(0) can be reproduced independently.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below. Revisions have been made to clarify the scope of the tree-level matching and to better separate the model-independent operator no-go from the model-dependent sign of the D-term.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The tree-level matching of the stress-decorated Wilson line to the local EMT (paragraph on operator construction and matching) is presented as sufficient to establish the operator-level no-go separating the A_g and C_g projections. It is not shown whether this matching captures possible sub-leading operator mixing, gauge artifacts, or reproduces the precise kinematic factor for C_g(t) when the operator is sandwiched between states; if any of these elements are incomplete, the claimed generality of the no-go does not follow.

    Authors: We agree that the matching is performed at tree level within the small-x kinematics and does not address possible sub-leading operator mixing, gauge artifacts beyond this order, or the precise matrix-element kinematic factors for C_g(t). The operator no-go is therefore restricted to the leading small-x regime where the transverse stress projection first appears at next-to-eikonal order. We have added clarifying text in the operator-construction section and the conclusions to limit the claim accordingly and to note that a complete all-order analysis lies beyond the present scope. The kinematic distinction between the T^{++} projection for A_g and the T^{ij} projection for C_g remains valid within the stated approximation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The negative sign of D_g(0) is generated inside the specific anti-aligned response class F^{i-}=-ε R_NE F^{i+} with Λ_NE>0. While the paper correctly emphasizes model dependence, the operator no-go statement is therefore tied to this modeling assumption rather than being independent of it; the numerical stability is shown only within that class.

    Authors: The operator-level no-go asserts that the leading-eikonal dipole S_x(b_⊥,r_⊥) or saturation profile Q_s^2(x,b) alone cannot fix the sub-eikonal stress operators (F^{i-}, F^{ij}) that enter C_g(t); this statement is independent of any particular response model. The anti-aligned response F^{i-}=-ε R_NE F^{i+} with Λ_NE>0 is introduced only as one consistent class that produces D_g(0)<0, and the numerical scans demonstrate stability inside that class. We have revised the abstract, introduction, and discussion sections to sharpen this distinction between the model-independent no-go and the model-dependent sign, while retaining the explicit statement that the sign is not universal. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is operator construction plus explicit model choice

full rationale

The paper constructs a stress-decorated Wilson line containing sub-eikonal fields (F^{i-}, F^{ij}) and performs a tree-level matching to the transverse EMT component T_g^{ij} that projects C_g(t). This yields the stated operator-level no-go that the leading-eikonal dipole S_x or Q_s^2 profile cannot fix the sign of D_g. The subsequent finite-correlation response model explicitly introduces the anti-aligned ansatz F^{i-} = -ε R_NE F^{i+} to obtain one possible sign; the paper presents this as an illustration within a chosen response class rather than a universal derivation. No self-citations appear, no parameters are fitted to data and relabeled as predictions, and the central separation between A_g and C_g projections follows directly from the kinematic/operator distinction without reducing to the input dipole by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the kinematic projection difference between T_g^{++} and T_g^{ij}, the tree-level operator matching, and the specific anti-aligned response model; these are not supplied by prior literature.

free parameters (1)
  • R_NE or Lambda_NE
    Response strength parameter introduced to generate the anti-aligned sub-eikonal field and the resulting negative D-term.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Tree-level matching between stress-decorated Wilson lines and the local energy-momentum tensor holds in the Drell-Yan frame.
    Invoked to obtain the operator-level no-go statement.
  • domain assumption The symmetric-traceless transverse stress T_g^{ij} first appears at next-to-eikonal order.
    Kinematic and operatorial premise separating A_g from C_g.
invented entities (1)
  • stress-decorated Wilson lines containing F^{i-} or F^{ij} no independent evidence
    purpose: Gauge-invariant operator representing the sub-eikonal stress projection for C_g(t).
    New operator constructed to capture the transverse stress that is absent from the ordinary dipole.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5849 in / 1434 out tokens · 27914 ms · 2026-07-02T10:55:01.606889+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages · 34 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gauge-Invariant Decomposition of Nucleon Spin and Its Spin-Off

    X.-D. Ji,Gauge-invariant decomposition of nucleon spin,Phys. Rev. Lett.78(1997) 610 [hep-ph/9603249]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  2. [2]

    Computing Quark and Gluon Distribution Functions for Very Large Nuclei

    L.D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan,Computing quark and gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 2233 [hep-ph/9309289]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  3. [3]

    Operator expansion for high-energy scattering

    I. Balitsky,Operator expansion for high-energy scattering,Nucl. Phys. B463(1996) 99 [hep-ph/9509348]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  4. [4]

    Small-x F_2 Structure Function of a Nucleus Including Multiple Pomeron Exchanges

    Y.V. Kovchegov,Small x F2 structure function of a nucleus including multiple pomeron exchanges,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 034008 [hep-ph/9901281]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  5. [5]

    The Color Glass Condensate

    F. Gelis, E. Iancu, J. Jalilian-Marian and R. Venugopalan,The Color Glass Condensate, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60(2010) 463 [1002.0333]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Forces inside hadrons: pressure, surface tension, mechanical radius, and all that

    M.V. Polyakov and P. Schweitzer,Forces inside hadrons: pressure, surface tension, mechanical radius, and all that,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33(2018) 1830025 [1805.06596]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Burkert, L

    V.D. Burkert, L. Elouadrhiri and F.X. Girod,The pressure distribution inside the proton, Nature557(2018) 396

    2018

  8. [8]

    Duran et al.,Determining the gluonic gravitational form factors of the proton,Nature 615(2023) 813 [2207.05212]

    B. Duran et al.,Determining the gluonic gravitational form factors of the proton,Nature 615(2023) 813 [2207.05212]

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Hackett, D.A

    D.C. Hackett, D.A. Pefkou and P.E. Shanahan,Gravitational form factors of the proton from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 251904 [2310.08484]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Mass radius and D-term of atomic nuclei in relativistic mean field theory

    Y. Hatta, T. Oishi and M. Oka,Mass radius and D-term of atomic nuclei in relativistic mean field theory,2605.12023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Revisiting the mechanical properties of the nucleon

    C. Lorce et al.,Revisiting the mechanical properties of the nucleon,1810.09837. – 18 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Nucleon gravitational form factors from instantons: forces between quark and gluon subsystems

    M.V. Polyakov et al.,Nucleon gravitational form factors from instantons: forces between quark and gluon subsystems,1808.00155

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    On operator relations for gravitational form factors of a spin-0 hadron

    K. Tanaka et al.,On operator relations for gravitational form factors of a spin-0 hadron, 1806.10591

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Tanaka et al.,Operator Relations for Gravitational Form Factors,1905.01934

    K. Tanaka et al.,Operator Relations for Gravitational Form Factors,1905.01934

    work page arXiv 1905

  15. [15]

    Choudhary et al.,3D EMT distributions as an Abel image of 2D EMT distributions on the light-front,2304.02095

    P. Choudhary et al.,3D EMT distributions as an Abel image of 2D EMT distributions on the light-front,2304.02095

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Gluon gravitational form factors of the nucleon and the pion from lattice QCD

    P.E. Shanahan et al.,Gluon gravitational form factors of the nucleon and the pion from lattice QCD,1810.04626

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Hackett et al.,Gravitational form factors of the pion from lattice QCD,2307.11707

    D.C. Hackett et al.,Gravitational form factors of the pion from lattice QCD,2307.11707

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Cao, F.-K

    X.-H. Cao et al.,Dispersive Determination of Nucleon Gravitational Form Factors, 2411.13398

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Cao et al.,Gravitational form factors of pions, kaons and nucleons from dispersion relations,2507.05375

    X.-H. Cao et al.,Gravitational form factors of pions, kaons and nucleons from dispersion relations,2507.05375

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    Broniowski et al.,Gravitational form factors and mechanical properties of the nucleon in a meson dominance approach,2503.09297

    W. Broniowski et al.,Gravitational form factors and mechanical properties of the nucleon in a meson dominance approach,2503.09297

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    Fujii et al.,Dominance of gluonic scale anomaly in confining pressure inside nucleon and D-term,2503.09686

    D. Fujii et al.,Dominance of gluonic scale anomaly in confining pressure inside nucleon and D-term,2503.09686

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Gluon Gravitational $ D$-Form Factor: The $\sigma$-Meson as a Dilaton Confronted with Lattice Data II

    R. Stegeman et al.,Gluon Gravitational D-Form Factor: The sigma-Meson as a Dilaton Confronted with Lattice Data II,2512.12315

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Coriano et al.,Dilaton Sum Rules of Gravitational Form Factors in QCD at Order alpha_s,2603.24303

    C. Coriano et al.,Dilaton Sum Rules of Gravitational Form Factors in QCD at Order alpha_s,2603.24303

    work page arXiv

  24. [24]

    Holographic $J/\psi$ production near threshold and the proton mass problem

    Y. Hatta and D.-L. Yang,Holographic J/psi production near threshold and the proton mass problem,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 074003 [1808.02163]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Tong et al.,Gluon Gravitational Form Factors at Large Momentum Transfer, 2101.02395

    X.-B. Tong et al.,Gluon Gravitational Form Factors at Large Momentum Transfer, 2101.02395

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Wang et al.,Gluon gravitational form factors of protons from charmonium photoproduction,2208.03186

    X.-Y. Wang et al.,Gluon gravitational form factors of protons from charmonium photoproduction,2208.03186

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    Wang et al.,Gravitational form factors of the proton from near-threshold vector meson photoproduction,2308.04644

    X.-Y. Wang et al.,Gravitational form factors of the proton from near-threshold vector meson photoproduction,2308.04644

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Meziani et al.,Gluonic Energy Momentum Tensor Form Factors of the Proton, 2505.05671

    Z.-E. Meziani et al.,Gluonic Energy Momentum Tensor Form Factors of the Proton, 2505.05671

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Sain et al.,Near-threshold heavy quarkonium photoproduction in a light-front spectator model,2601.05840

    A. Sain et al.,Near-threshold heavy quarkonium photoproduction in a light-front spectator model,2601.05840

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Collaboration et al.,Near-Threshold J/psi to mu+ mu- Photoproduction and the Gluonic Gravitational Form Factors of the Proton,2602.14416

    J.-. Collaboration et al.,Near-Threshold J/psi to mu+ mu- Photoproduction and the Gluonic Gravitational Form Factors of the Proton,2602.14416

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Syamtomov et al.,Chromoelectric projections of light-front gluonic gravitational distributions in near-threshold quarkonium scattering,2606.14304

    A.I. Syamtomov et al.,Chromoelectric projections of light-front gluonic gravitational distributions in near-threshold quarkonium scattering,2606.14304

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Nuclear Gluon Gravitational Form Factors and Neutron Skins at the Electron-Ion Collider

    L. Wang et al.,Nuclear Gluon Gravitational Form Factors and Neutron Skins at the Electron-Ion Collider,2606.25078. – 19 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Pressure-Energy Equations of State of the Nucleon

    K.-F. Liu et al.,Pressure-Energy Equations of State of the Nucleon,2605.04163

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Giannini et al.,Perturbative structure of two- and four-point functions of color charge in a non-Gaussian small-x action,2111.04868

    A.V. Giannini et al.,Perturbative structure of two- and four-point functions of color charge in a non-Gaussian small-x action,2111.04868

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Bergabo et al.,One-Loop Corrections to Dihadron Production in DIS at Small x, 2207.03606

    F. Bergabo et al.,One-Loop Corrections to Dihadron Production in DIS at Small x, 2207.03606

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Caucal et al.,Back-to-back inclusive dijets in DIS at small x: Sudakov suppression and gluon saturation at NLO,2208.13872

    P. Caucal et al.,Back-to-back inclusive dijets in DIS at small x: Sudakov suppression and gluon saturation at NLO,2208.13872

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    Bergabo et al.,Dihadron Production in DIS at Small x at Next to Leading Order: Transverse Photons,2301.03117

    F. Bergabo et al.,Dihadron Production in DIS at Small x at Next to Leading Order: Transverse Photons,2301.03117

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Caucal et al.,Back-to-back inclusive dijets in DIS at small x: Gluon Weizsacker-Williams distribution at NLO,2304.03304

    P. Caucal et al.,Back-to-back inclusive dijets in DIS at small x: Gluon Weizsacker-Williams distribution at NLO,2304.03304

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Caucal et al.,Back-to-back inclusive dijets in DIS at small x: Complete NLO results and predictions,2308.00022

    P. Caucal et al.,Back-to-back inclusive dijets in DIS at small x: Complete NLO results and predictions,2308.00022

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    Kang et al.,Direct quarkonium-plus-gluon production in DIS in the Color Glass Condensate,2310.12102

    Z.-B. Kang et al.,Direct quarkonium-plus-gluon production in DIS in the Color Glass Condensate,2310.12102

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Kang et al.,Transverse Energy-Energy Correlators in the Color-Glass Condensate at the Electron-Ion Collider,2311.17142

    Z.-B. Kang et al.,Transverse Energy-Energy Correlators in the Color-Glass Condensate at the Electron-Ion Collider,2311.17142

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Caucal et al.,Semi-inclusive single-jet production in DIS at next-to-leading order in the Color Glass Condensate,2401.01934

    P. Caucal et al.,Semi-inclusive single-jet production in DIS at next-to-leading order in the Color Glass Condensate,2401.01934

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Bergabo et al.,SIDIS at small x at next-to-leading order: gluon contribution, 2401.06259

    F. Bergabo et al.,SIDIS at small x at next-to-leading order: gluon contribution, 2401.06259

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    Beuf et al.,Diffractive deep inelastic scattering at NLO in the dipole picture, 2401.17251

    G. Beuf et al.,Diffractive deep inelastic scattering at NLO in the dipole picture, 2401.17251

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Caucal et al.,Dihadron correlations in small-x DIS at NLO: transverse momentum dependent fragmentation,2405.19404

    P. Caucal et al.,Dihadron correlations in small-x DIS at NLO: transverse momentum dependent fragmentation,2405.19404

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Caucal et al.,Evolution of the transverse-momentum dependent gluon distribution at small x,2406.04238

    P. Caucal et al.,Evolution of the transverse-momentum dependent gluon distribution at small x,2406.04238

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Altinoluk et al.,Sudakov double logs in single-inclusive hadron production in DIS at small x from the Color Glass Condensate formalism,2406.08277

    T. Altinoluk et al.,Sudakov double logs in single-inclusive hadron production in DIS at small x from the Color Glass Condensate formalism,2406.08277

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    Mantysaari et al.,Finite-size effects on small-x evolution and saturation in proton and nuclear targets,2411.13533

    H. Mantysaari et al.,Finite-size effects on small-x evolution and saturation in proton and nuclear targets,2411.13533

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Altinoluk et al.,SIDIS at small x at next-to-leading order: transverse photon, 2505.04557

    T. Altinoluk et al.,SIDIS at small x at next-to-leading order: transverse photon, 2505.04557

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    Penttala et al.,Color-glass condensate beyond the Gaussian approximation,2507.18711

    J. Penttala et al.,Color-glass condensate beyond the Gaussian approximation,2507.18711

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    Boussarie et al.,Collinear Structure of Nonlinear Small-x Evolution,2509.20236

    R. Boussarie et al.,Collinear Structure of Nonlinear Small-x Evolution,2509.20236

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    Dai et al.,Physics-Informed Global Extraction of the Universal Small-x Dipole Amplitude,2603.08008

    S.-W. Dai et al.,Physics-Informed Global Extraction of the Universal Small-x Dipole Amplitude,2603.08008

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    When JIMWLK evolution really matters: the example of incoherent diffraction

    T. Lappi et al.,When JIMWLK evolution really matters: the example of incoherent diffraction,2604.26123. – 20 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Nuclear structure and saturation effects from diffractive vector meson production

    H. Mantysaari et al.,Nuclear structure and saturation effects from diffractive vector meson production,2605.00454

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Matching collinear factorization with color-glass condensate for inclusive and exclusive deep inelastic scattering

    S. Bhattacharya et al.,Matching collinear factorization with color-glass condensate for inclusive and exclusive deep inelastic scattering,2605.14092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    Quark orbital motions from Wigner distributions

    T. Liu et al.,Quark orbital motions from Wigner distributions,1406.7709

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Use of the Husimi distribution for nucleon tomography

    Y. Hagiwara et al.,Use of the Husimi distribution for nucleon tomography,1412.4591

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Husimi distribution for nucleon tomography

    Y. Hatta et al.,Husimi distribution for nucleon tomography,1512.05825

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    Wigner, Husimi and GTMD distributions in the Color Glass Condensate

    Y. Hagiwara et al.,Wigner, Husimi and GTMD distributions in the Color Glass Condensate,1609.05773

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    Gluon Tomography from Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering at Small-x

    Y. Hatta et al.,Gluon Tomography from Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering at Small-x, 1703.02085

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Wigner Distributions For Gluons

    J. More et al.,Wigner Distributions For Gluons,1709.00943

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    Directed flow from C-odd gluon correlations at small $x$

    D. Boer et al.,Directed flow from C-odd gluon correlations at small x,1805.05219

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    Altinoluk et al.,Low x physics as an infinite twist (G)TMD framework: unravelling the origins of saturation,1902.07930

    T. Altinoluk et al.,Low x physics as an infinite twist (G)TMD framework: unravelling the origins of saturation,1902.07930

    work page arXiv 1902

  64. [64]

    Hatta et al.,QCD Resummation in Hard Diffractive Dijet Production at the Electron-Ion Collider,1907.09491

    Y. Hatta et al.,QCD Resummation in Hard Diffractive Dijet Production at the Electron-Ion Collider,1907.09491

    work page arXiv 1907

  65. [65]

    Hagiwara et al.,Spin-dependent Pomeron and Odderon in elastic proton-proton scattering,2003.03680

    Y. Hagiwara et al.,Spin-dependent Pomeron and Odderon in elastic proton-proton scattering,2003.03680

    work page arXiv 2003

  66. [66]

    Boer et al.,GTMD model predictions for diffractive dijet production at EIC,2106.15148

    D. Boer et al.,GTMD model predictions for diffractive dijet production at EIC,2106.15148

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Hatta et al.,Semi-inclusive Diffractive Deep Inelastic Scattering at Small-x,2205.08060

    Y. Hatta et al.,Semi-inclusive Diffractive Deep Inelastic Scattering at Small-x,2205.08060

    work page arXiv

  68. [68]

    Agrawal et al.,Spin-flip gluon GTMD F_1,2 at small-x,2312.04132

    S. Agrawal et al.,Spin-flip gluon GTMD F_1,2 at small-x,2312.04132

    work page arXiv

  69. [69]

    Hatta et al.,Angular dependence in transverse momentum dependent diffractive parton distributions at small-x,2403.19609

    Y. Hatta et al.,Angular dependence in transverse momentum dependent diffractive parton distributions at small-x,2403.19609

    work page arXiv

  70. [70]

    Agrawal et al.,Small-x evolution of dipole amplitude in momentum space: forward–off-forward correspondence,2411.12497

    S. Agrawal et al.,Small-x evolution of dipole amplitude in momentum space: forward–off-forward correspondence,2411.12497

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    Unpolarized GPDs at small $x$ and non-zero skewness

    Y.V. Kovchegov et al.,Unpolarized GPDs at small x and non-zero skewness,2512.10086

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    Benic et al.,Generalized transverse momentum distributions at small-x,2603.06092

    S. Benic et al.,Generalized transverse momentum distributions at small-x,2603.06092

    work page arXiv

  73. [73]

    Twisting Small-$x$ Gluon Tomography with Orbital Angular Momentum

    W. Kou et al.,Twisting Small-x Gluon Tomography with Orbital Angular Momentum, 2606.22871

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [74]

    Next-to-eikonal corrections in the CGC: gluon production and spin asymmetries in pA collisions

    T. Altinoluk, N. Armesto, G. Beuf, A. Kovner and M. Lublinsky,Next-to-eikonal corrections in the CGC: gluon production and spin asymmetries in pA collisions,Phys. Lett. B735(2014) 290 [1404.2219]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  75. [75]

    Next-to-next-to-eikonal corrections in the CGC

    T. Altinoluk, N. Armesto, G. Beuf, A. Moscoso and C.A. Salgado,Next-to-eikonal corrections in the CGC: quark production and spin asymmetries in pA collisions,JHEP11 (2015) 103 [1505.01400]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  76. [76]

    Sub-eikonal corrections to scattering amplitudes at high energy

    G.A. Chirilli,Sub-eikonal corrections to scattering amplitudes at high energy,JHEP01 (2019) 118 [1807.11435]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  77. [77]

    Agostini et al.,Multiparticle production in proton-nucleus collisions beyond eikonal accuracy,2207.10472

    P. Agostini et al.,Multiparticle production in proton-nucleus collisions beyond eikonal accuracy,2207.10472. – 21 –

    work page arXiv

  78. [78]

    Agostini et al.,Finite width effects on the azimuthal asymmetry in proton-nucleus collisions in the Color Glass Condensate,2212.03633

    P. Agostini et al.,Finite width effects on the azimuthal asymmetry in proton-nucleus collisions in the Color Glass Condensate,2212.03633

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    T. Altinoluk et al.,Probing quark transverse momentum distributions in the Color Glass Condensate: quark-gluon dijets in Deep Inelastic Scattering at next-to-eikonal accuracy, 2303.12691

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    Li et al.,Small x Physics Beyond Eikonal Approximation: an Effective Hamiltonian Approach,2304.12842

    M. Li et al.,Small x Physics Beyond Eikonal Approximation: an Effective Hamiltonian Approach,2304.12842

    work page arXiv

Showing first 80 references.