REVIEW 9 cited by
e3: Learning to Explore Enables Extrapolation of Test-Time Compute for LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
e3: Learning to Explore Enables Extrapolation of Test-Time Compute for LLMs
read the original abstract
Test-time scaling offers a promising path to improve LLM reasoning by utilizing more compute at inference time; however, the true promise of this paradigm lies in extrapolation (i.e., improvement in performance on hard problems as LLMs keep "thinking" for longer, beyond the maximum token budget they were trained on). Surprisingly, we find that most existing reasoning models do not extrapolate well. We show that one way to enable extrapolation is by training the LLM to perform in-context exploration: training the LLM to effectively spend its test time budget by chaining operations (such as generation, verification, refinement, etc.), or testing multiple hypotheses before it commits to an answer. To enable in-context exploration, we identify three key ingredients as part of our recipe e3: (1) chaining skills that the base LLM has asymmetric competence in, e.g., chaining verification (easy) with generation (hard), as a way to implement in-context search; (2) leveraging "negative" gradients from incorrect traces to amplify exploration during RL, resulting in longer search traces that chains additional asymmetries; and (3) coupling task difficulty with training token budget during training via a specifically-designed curriculum to structure in-context exploration. Our recipe e3 produces the best known 1.7B model according to AIME'25 and HMMT'25 scores, and extrapolates to 2x the training token budget. Our e3-1.7B model not only attains high pass@1 scores, but also improves pass@k over the base model.
Forward citations
Cited by 9 Pith papers
-
OrderGrad: Optimizing Beyond the Mean with Order-Statistic Policy Gradient Estimation
OrderGrad supplies unbiased likelihood-ratio and reparameterization gradient estimators for finite-sample L-statistics by applying a rank-based reward transformation usable in standard policy-gradient updates.
-
Training Reasoning Models on Saturated Problems via Failure-Prefix Conditioning
Failure-prefix conditioning unlocks learning from saturated reasoning problems by conditioning on failure prefixes, improving recovery from misleading early steps and matching gains from new medium-difficulty problems.
-
On Advantage Estimates for Max@K Policy Gradients
Proposes MaxPO using a Leave-Two-Out baseline for centered unbiased advantages in max@K policy gradients, with a unified derivation of finite-batch estimators.
-
OGPO: Sample Efficient Full-Finetuning of Generative Control Policies
OGPO is a sample-efficient off-policy method for full finetuning of generative control policies that reaches SOTA on robotic manipulation tasks and can recover from poor behavior-cloning initializations without expert data.
-
OGPO: Sample Efficient Full-Finetuning of Generative Control Policies
OGPO enables sample-efficient full-finetuning of generative control policies via off-policy critics and modified PPO, achieving SOTA on robot manipulation tasks while rescuing poorly initialized behavior cloning polic...
-
Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data
A parameter-free sampling strategy called CUTS combined with Mixed-CUTS training prevents mode collapse in RL for saturated LLM reasoning tasks and raises AIME25 Pass@1 accuracy by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO.
-
What Does Flow Matching Bring To TD Learning?
Flow matching critics outperform monolithic ones in RL by 2x performance and 5x sample efficiency via test-time error recovery through integration and multi-point velocity supervision that preserves feature plasticity.
-
Representation-Based Exploration for Language Models: From Test-Time to Post-Training
Representation-based elliptical bonuses improve inference-time and post-training pass@k for LLM reasoning, but the headline AIME result is tainted by validation/test overlap.
-
Outcome-based Exploration for LLM Reasoning
Outcome-based exploration bonuses (UCB-Con and Batch) improve pass@1 and pass@32 for LLM math reasoning while slowing diversity collapse, supported by a bandit model with a strong generalization assumption.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.