Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 183 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

Inflation's quantum seeds to today's cosmic structure, derived end to end

2026-07-09 22:08 UTC pith:7ZPL4WT2

load-bearing objection Solid pedagogical textbook on cosmological perturbation theory from inflation through reheating, with working code. No new science, but well-executed for its stated purpose.

arxiv 2607.06983 v1 pith:7ZPL4WT2 submitted 2026-07-08 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

From inflation to hot big bang -- a tutorial on cosmological perturbations

Mikko Laine , Simona Procacci This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords perturbationsdensityinflationbangcosmologicalexpansionexponentialaccessible
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This is a pedagogical treatise that derives the complete chain from inflationary quantum fluctuations to observable cosmological perturbations within a single self-consistent framework. The authors develop linear cosmological perturbation theory from first principles: starting with the Einstein equations on a homogeneous and isotropic background, they introduce first-order perturbations, decompose them into scalar, vector, and tensor components, and track their evolution through three distinct epochs. During inflation, quantum vacuum fluctuations in a scalar field generate curvature perturbations. When modes exit the Hubble horizon, these perturbations freeze out and become classical. During reheating, the inflaton's energy thermalizes into a hot plasma, and the authors incorporate dissipative dynamics, thermal noise, and fluctuation-dissipation relations into the perturbation equations. When modes re-enter the horizon in the post-inflationary universe, they seed acoustic oscillations in the photon-baryon plasma and gravitational waves. Throughout, the authors insist on gauge-invariant variables, meaning quantities whose physical content does not depend on arbitrary coordinate choices. They provide explicit computer-algebraic derivations and numerical Python scripts for every step that is too tedious for hand computation. The load-bearing claim is that linear perturbation theory, combined with gauge-invariant variables and careful treatment of thermalization, suffices to connect inflationary initial conditions to all standard cosmological observables: the scalar power spectrum amplitude and tilt, the tensor-to-scalar ratio, spectral distortions, and effective neutrino degrees of freedom.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the entire pipeline from inflationary vacuum fluctuations through reheating to observable cosmological signatures can be formulated as a single, internally consistent linear perturbation theory, provided one works with gauge-invariant curvature perturbations, incorporates dissipative and stochastic thermal effects during reheating via Langevin-type equations with fluctuation-dissipation relations, and tracks mode evolution through Hubble horizon exit and re-entry. The curvature perturbation R_T serves as the central object: it is conserved outside the horizon, carries the inflationary initial conditions, and maps onto the scalar power spectrum that seeds all later-

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the gauge-invariant curvature perturbation R_T, defined as a specific combination of metric and matter perturbations that remains unchanged under coordinate transformations. The Mukhanov-Sasaki equation governs its evolution during inflation, with Bunch-Davies vacuum initial conditions setting the quantum state. During reheating, a Langevin equation for the inflaton adds dissipative friction (rate Υ) and thermal noise (correlator Ω), linked by a fluctuation-dissipation relation. The Einstein equations at linear order, decomposed into scalar/vector/tensor sectors via transverse and longitudinal projectors, provide the dynamical constraints. Transfer functions map the冻

Load-bearing premise

The entire framework assumes that second-order perturbations are negligible relative to the sum of zeroth and first-order terms. This is observationally well-motivated by the tiny CMB anisotropy (about one part in 100,000), but it may break down during reheating when the inflaton oscillates coherently and during any non-thermal phase transition.

What would settle it

If second-order perturbations during reheating or at horizon re-entry were shown to produce corrections comparable to first-order terms, the linear framework would need significant extension and the claimed self-consistency would fail.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the linear framework is sufficient end-to-end, then any discrepancy between predicted and observed power spectra at small scales would point to new physics during reheating rather than to a failure of perturbation theory itself.
  • The inclusion of thermal noise and dissipation in the perturbation equations means that reheating is not an instantaneous process but leaves imprints on the scalar power spectrum that depend on the reheating temperature and inflaton coupling, making these observable in principle.
  • The tensor perturbation equation, being a wave equation with Hubble friction plus viscous corrections, provides a direct link between gravitational-wave observatories and the thermal history of the early universe.
  • The gauge-invariant formulation ensures that predictions for CMB observables are coordinate-independent, making the framework robust against the choice of computational gauge.
  • The provided numerical and symbolic tools make the full pipeline reproducible, allowing independent verification of each step from background evolution to power spectrum computation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. These lecture notes provide a pedagogical, self-contained derivation of cosmological perturbation theory, spanning the chain from inflationary quantum fluctuations through reheating and thermalization to observable signatures in the CMB and gravitational-wave backgrounds. The manuscript develops the FLRW background (Chapter 1), defines observable targets (Chapter 2), derives first-order perturbation equations with full scalar-vector-tensor decomposition (Chapter 3), treats gauge invariance systematically (Chapter 4), and then applies the formalism to inflationary perturbation generation (Chapters 5–6), dissipative reheating (Chapter 7), horizon exit/entry dynamics (Chapters 8–9), and gravitational-wave probes (Chapter 10). Python scripts for numerical and symbolic computations are publicly hosted. The notes are published as Springer Lecture Notes in Physics 1047.

Significance. The manuscript fills a genuine pedagogical gap. Existing textbooks on cosmological perturbations typically operate at a level above what a first exposure requires, and most do not integrate the reheating/thermalization epoch into the perturbation framework. The explicit, step-by-step derivations of the Einstein tensor, gauge transformations, and curvature perturbation equations—with internal crosschecks from gauge invariance—are a notable strength. The inclusion of dissipative dynamics (friction coefficient Υ, thermal noise ϱ, Langevin equation in eq. 1.62) and the introduction of R_T as the conserved quantity during reheating (eq. 4.62) are pedagogically valuable and not standard in introductory treatments. The accompanying reproducible Python code and Mathematica transcriptions add practical value. The discussion of scalar-induced gravitational waves (sec. 10.4) as a bridge beyond linear order is a thoughtful exception to the otherwise linear-only framework.

minor comments (6)
  1. Eq. (1.88): The numerical coefficient appears inconsistent. The standard result for radiation domination gives t ∝ 1/√g* (since H ∝ √g* T²/m_pl and t = 1/(2H)). The expression as written, 't ≈ (3√5/4)√(g*π³) m_pl/T² ≈ 0.301√g* m_pl/T²', has √g* in the numerator. The correct result is t ≈ (3√5)/(4√(g*π³)) m_pl/T² ≈ 0.301/√g* × m_pl/T². The same issue appears in eq. (1.89) for dt/dT. Please verify and correct the placement of √(g*π³) (denominator vs. numerator) and the corresponding numerical approximation.
  2. Notation section (p. vi): The dual use of p for both physical momentum and pressure is acknowledged, but given how frequently both appear in the same equations (e.g., eqs. 1.34–1.44), a brief remark at first joint appearance would help readers.
  3. Eq. (1.102): The natural inflation parameters (f_a = 1.25 m_pl, m = 1.09×10⁻⁶ m_pl) are described as yielding 'semi-realistic observables.' Given that natural inflation with f_a ≳ 5 m_pl is increasingly disfavored by Planck constraints on n_s and r, a one-sentence caveat noting the observational tension would be appropriate for completeness, even in a pedagogical context.
  4. Sec. 2.4, eq. (2.35): The estimate ln(a₀/aₑ) = 64.7 for Tₑ = 10¹⁵ GeV is standard, but the reference to [2.45] (Standard Model equation of state data) for the slowly-varying coefficient could benefit from a one-line explanation of how the SM EoS modifies the naive g* counting, since this is a non-trivial input for students.
  5. The manuscript is already published as a Springer ebook (doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-09893-1). If this arXiv version is intended as a living document (as suggested by the GitHub link), a brief note clarifying the relationship between the published version and the arXiv/GitHub version would help readers track which is authoritative.
  6. Chapter 10 covers a very broad range of gravitational-wave topics (vacuum fluctuations, matter sources, scalar-induced, anisotropic stress, graviton production, transfer functions, frequency domains) in limited depth. While appropriate for lecture notes, a brief forward-reference table mapping each subsection to the corresponding specialized review would help students navigate further reading.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity found — pedagogical derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks

full rationale

This is a pedagogical tutorial that explicitly derives each step from first principles (Einstein equations → perturbation theory → gauge-invariant variables → Mukhanov-Sasaki equation → power spectra → reheating → observables). The observational parameters (A_s, n_s from Planck, eq. 2.8–2.9) are used as inputs/benchmarks, not claimed as derived predictions. The model parameters (f_a, m in eq. 1.102) are explicitly stated as chosen to 'yield semi-realistic observables,' which is standard model-fitting, not circular derivation. The curvature perturbation R_T (eq. 4.62) is defined as a gauge-invariant combination and its conservation is independently derived in chapter 8 from energy-momentum conservation — the definition and the conservation law are separate results. The only self-citation is to the PhD thesis [0.1] of one author, acknowledged as the origin of the lecture notes but with all content rederived explicitly. The EOS data [2.45] from one author is external numerical input, not a theoretical claim being verified. The Python scripts are publicly available for independent verification. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new entities are invented. The inflaton is a standard postulated field of inflationary cosmology, not introduced by this paper. All parameters are standard model-fitting choices for the benchmark natural inflation model, used for pedagogical illustration.

free parameters (3)
  • f_a (inflaton decay constant) = 1.25 m_pl
    Chosen in eq. 1.102 to yield semi-realistic CMB observables; a model parameter of natural inflation, not derived from first principles.
  • m (inflaton mass) = 1.09e-6 m_pl
    Chosen in eq. 1.102 to match the observed scalar amplitude A_s; standard model-fitting parameter.
  • phi(t_i) (initial field value) = 3.5 m_pl
    Set in eq. 1.103 to ensure sufficiently long inflation; an initial condition choice.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption General relativity is the correct description of gravity at early-universe energies
    The entire framework is built on Einstein equations (eq. 1.32). Invoked throughout, explicitly stated in the General Outline as not requiring quantum gravity.
  • domain assumption Linear perturbation theory is valid (second-order terms negligible)
    Stated in eq. 3.1 and discussed at end of sec. 5.3. Motivated by δT/T ~ 10^-5 but assumed throughout.
  • domain assumption The universe is homogeneous and isotropic at the largest scales
    FLRW metric adopted in eq. 1.2; justified by CMB observations in sec. 1.1.
  • domain assumption Quantum field theory in curved spacetime is valid for computing inflationary perturbations
    Bunch-Davies vacuum initial conditions in sec. 5.2 assume QFT in curved background; standard but unproven beyond perturbative level.
  • domain assumption Standard model of particle physics applies at early-universe temperatures
    Used for equation of state, g_* counting, and reheating dynamics in chapters 1 and 7.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 75493 in / 2580 out tokens · 262198 ms · 2026-07-09T22:08:58.960378+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

These lecture notes are meant as a pedagogic guide to cosmological inflation and the early epochs thereafter. Inflation explains how the seeds for density perturbations, which evolved into the largest structures in our universe, could have formed during a period of exponential expansion. Apart from density perturbations, also tensor perturbations are generated, which may be observed as gravitational waves. The formalism is developed through explicit computations, paying attention to general-relativistic gauge invariance, and to thermalization (the mechanism that converts part of the energy density driving exponential expansion into the conventional hot big bang). For the steps best handled numerically or computer-algebraically, simple python scripts are provided. We aim at an unassuming style, hopefully accessible to students of theoretical high-energy physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06983 by Mikko Laine, Simona Procacci.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1: Sketch of the Hubble rate, H, as a function of physical time (left, cf. eq. (1.86)) and conformal time (right, cf. eqs. (1.96) and (1.98)). By ti we denote an initial time, at which the Hubble rate takes the constant value Hi ≡ H(ti ), and by te the end of inflation, at which H starts to evolve. Inflation is assumed to end instantaneously, and we have set w = 0 afterwards (cf. eq. (1.74)), which correspo… view at source ↗
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.2. Figure 1.2: Numerical background solution, from eqs. (1.99)–(1.104), in physical time. For illus￾tration, the comoving momentum mode has been chosen as k/a(ti ) = 7.35 × 1052mpl, where the initial time, ti ≡ H −1 ref , is defined according to eq. (1.104). At late times, we have gone over from the full equation in eq. (1.99) to the simplified version in eq. (1.110), but the transition is smooth. This plot can be comp… view at source ↗
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: A sketch of the angular momentum power spectrum of the CMB temperature anisotropies, Dℓ (cf. eq. (2.4)), at different multipole moments ℓ. We note that a large multipole, ℓ, corresponds to a small angular scale, θℓ ≡ π/ℓ. In terms of the wavelength, λ ∼ 2π/k, of the underlying density perturbations, the angular de￾pendence originates by projecting plane waves onto spherical harmonics (this is described b… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: fig. 1.1 on p. 17). We then choose a moment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: figure 1.1(right) on p. 17) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p120_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.1. Figure 6.1: Left: The dashed blue line shows a numerical solution of eq. (6.11), with initial conditions fixed through eqs. (6.15) and (6.17), and the result normalized according to eq. (6.13). The parameters are like in fig. 1.2 on p. 21. The solid red curve shows the result from eq. (5.54) but without fixing to the moment H∗ of horizon crossing. We see how PRφ is normally much larger than H4/(2πφ¯˙) 2 , due to the… view at source ↗
Figure 7.1
Figure 7.1. Figure 7.1: A sketch of a typical timeline of how inflation ends, if Υ ≪ Γ. Here Υ is the equilibration rate of the low-momentum modes of the inflaton, and Γ is the equilibration rate of the plasma particles, with physical momenta p ∼ T. As the Hubble rate decreases, any interacting particles that are present tend to equilibrate when Γ > H, and form a plasma. In the end, when Υ > H, the inflaton background decays, a… view at source ↗
Figure 7.2
Figure 7.2. Figure 7.2: Left: A numerical solution for the reheating dynamics described by eqs. (7.48)–(7.50). The vacuum potential is like in eqs. (1.101) and (1.102), and Href is from eq. (1.104), whereas the equation of state of the plasma is parametrized according to eq. (7.114), and the friction according to eq. (7.115). If the friction is small (thin lines), the universe is matter-dominated until tHref ≈ 1016 (cf. discuss… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: fig. 7.2(right), which shows the initial momentum that corresponds to a given physical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p161_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9.1
Figure 9.1. Figure 9.1: Left: An example of a numerical solution of eqs. (9.26) and (9.27), for α = 1 2 , corresponding to radiation domination (cf. eq. (9.21)). The solid curve, displaying the power spectrum corresponding to RT , can be interpreted as a determination of a transfer function from eq. (9.60). We remark that this is a good approximation to the solution of the full eqs. (9.13) and (9.14). Right: Prototypical dark m… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: fig. 1.1(right), momenta with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p221_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10.1
Figure 10.1. Figure 10.1: Examples of Feynman diagrams for graviton production. Gravitons are denoted by doubled curly lines. (i) 2 → 2 scatterings, as described by eq. (10.112). The wiggly lines denote gauge bosons, for instance gluons, which give the dominant contribution in the Standard Model at high temperatures, due to their large multiplicity as well as a logarithmic enhancement of the so-called t-channel process [10.16]. … view at source ↗
Figure 10.2
Figure 10.2. Figure 10.2: A sketch of the transfer function for the tensor channel, h 2Tt , from eq. (10.147). The lower horizontal axis displays the current frequency, f0/Hz, and the upper one the temperature at which the corresponding mode re-enters the Hubble horizon, cf. eqs. (2.40) and (2.41). The small features correspond to mass thresholds, or the QCD and electroweak (or higher-scale) phase transitions, which induce a tra… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: fig. 10.3). However, an exquisite resolution might be needed for observing the signal. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p236_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: fig. 10.2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p238_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10.3
Figure 10.3. Figure 10.3: An illustration of the contributions of inflation and post-reheating physics to the current gravitational-wave energy density. Only features that are guaranteed to be present are displayed, even though their amplitudes are still unknown (they depend, respectively, on the energy scale of inflation, and on the maximal temperature after reheating). The curves that we show are oversimplified; an example of … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

183 extracted references · 183 canonical work pages · 110 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S. Procacci, Towards a thermally complete study of inflationary predictions , PhD thesis, University of Bern, Switzerland, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48549/4522 https://doi.org/10.48549/4522

    work page doi:10.48549/4522 2023

  2. [2]

    Kurki-Suonio, Cosmological Perturbation Theory , University of Helsinki, Finland, 2024, https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/hkurkisu/ https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/hkurkisu/

    H. Kurki-Suonio, Cosmological Perturbation Theory , University of Helsinki, Finland, 2024, https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/hkurkisu/ https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/hkurkisu/

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Kodama and M

    H. Kodama and M. Sasaki, Cosmological Perturbation Theory, https://doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.78.1 Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ Suppl.\ 78 (1984) 1

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.78.1 1984

  4. [4]

    Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology

    A.D. Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, Contemp.\ Concepts Phys.\ 5 (1990) 1 [hep-th/0503203 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503203]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1990

  5. [5]

    Mukhanov, H.A

    V.F. Mukhanov, H.A. Feldman, and R.H. Brandenberger, Theory of cosmological perturbations, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-Z Phys. Rept. 215 (1992) 203

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-z 1992

  6. [6]

    Liddle and D.H

    A.R. Liddle and D.H. Lyth, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175180 Cosmological Inflation and Large-Scale Structure (Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175180 2000

  7. [7]

    Mukhanov and S

    V. Mukhanov and S. Winitzki, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809149 Introduction to Quantum Effects in Gravity (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809149 2007

  8. [8]

    Weinberg, Cosmology (Oxford University Press, 2008)

    S. Weinberg, Cosmology (Oxford University Press, 2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Durrer, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316471524 The Cosmic Microwave Background (Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    R. Durrer, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316471524 The Cosmic Microwave Background (Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    work page doi:10.1017/9781316471524 2020

  10. [10]

    Cosmological perturbations

    K.A. Malik and D. Wands, Cosmological perturbations, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.03.001 Phys.\ Rept.\ 475 (2009) 1 [0809.4944 https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.4944]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.03.001 2009

  11. [11]

    TASI Lectures on Inflation

    D. Baumann, Inflation, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814327183_0010 Contribution to TASI 2009 [0907.5424 https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.5424]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789814327183_0010 2009

  12. [12]

    Gorbunov and V.A

    D.S. Gorbunov and V.A. Rubakov, https://doi.org/10.1142/7873 Introduction to the Theory of the Early Universe: Cosmological Perturbations and Inflationary Theory (World Scientific, 2011)

    work page doi:10.1142/7873 2011

  13. [13]

    Huterer, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009070232 A Course in Cosmology --- From Theory to Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    D. Huterer, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009070232 A Course in Cosmology --- From Theory to Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    work page doi:10.1017/9781009070232 2023

  14. [14]

    Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology , John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1971

    S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology , John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1971

    work page 1971

  15. [15]

    The first second of the Universe

    D.J. Schwarz, The first second of the universe , https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.200310010 Annalen Phys.\ 12 (2003) 220 [astro-ph/0303574 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0303574]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1002/andp.200310010 2003

  16. [16]

    Mambrini, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66994-1 Particles in the Dark Universe

    Y. Mambrini, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66994-1 Particles in the Dark Universe. A Student's Guide to Particle Physics and Cosmology , Springer, 2021

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66994-1 2021

  17. [17]

    Rubakov and D.S

    V.A. Rubakov and D.S. Gorbunov, https://doi.org/10.1142/10447 Introduction to the Theory of the Early Universe: Hot Big Bang Theory , World Scientific, 2017

    work page doi:10.1142/10447 2017

  18. [18]

    Smoot et al

    G.F. Smoot et al. [COBE], Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First Year Maps , https://doi.org/10.1086/186504 Astrophys.\ J.\ Lett.\ 396 (1992) L1

    work page doi:10.1086/186504 1992

  19. [19]

    Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck

    N. Aghanim et al. [Planck], Planck 2018 results.\ I.\ Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833880 Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 641 (2020) A1 [1807.06205 https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06205]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833880 2018

  20. [20]

    On Inflation with Non-minimal Coupling

    M.P. Hertzberg, On inflation with non-minimal coupling , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2010)023 JHEP\ 11 (2010) 023 [1002.2995 https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.2995]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2010)023 2010

  21. [21]

    Freese, J.A

    K. Freese, J.A. Frieman and A.V. Olinto, Natural inflation with pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.3233 Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 65 (1990) 3233

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.65.3233 1990

  22. [22]

    Deflationary Universe Scenario

    B. Spokoiny, Deflationary Universe scenario, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(93)90155-B Phys.\ Lett.\ B 315 (1993) 40 [gr-qc/9306008 https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9306008]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90155-b 1993

  23. [23]

    M. Joyce, Electroweak baryogenesis and the expansion rate of the Universe, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.1875 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 55 (1997) 1875 [hep-ph/9606223 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9606223]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.1875 1997

  24. [24]

    Guth, Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 23 (1981) 347

    A.H. Guth, Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 23 (1981) 347

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.347 1981

  25. [25]

    A.D. Linde, A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 108 (1982) 389

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9 1982

  26. [26]

    Albrecht and P.J

    A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1220 Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 48 (1982) 1220

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.1220 1982

  27. [27]

    Physics Letters B , year = 1983, month = sep, volume =

    A.D. Linde, Chaotic inflation, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 129 (1983) 177

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7 1983

  28. [28]

    Bouncing Cosmologies

    M. Novello and S.E.P. Bergliaffa, Bouncing cosmologies , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2008.04.006 Phys.\ Rept.\ 463 (2008) 127 [0802.1634 https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.1634]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.04.006 2008

  29. [29]

    Rees, Polarization and Spectrum of the Primeval Radiation in an Anisotropic Universe, https://doi.org/10.1086/180208 Astrophys.\ J.\ 153 (1968) L1

    M.J. Rees, Polarization and Spectrum of the Primeval Radiation in an Anisotropic Universe, https://doi.org/10.1086/180208 Astrophys.\ J.\ 153 (1968) L1

    work page doi:10.1086/180208 1968

  30. [30]

    Bond and G

    J.R. Bond and G. Efstathiou, Cosmic background radiation anisotropies in universes dominated by nonbaryonic dark matter, https://doi.org/10.1086/184362 Astrophys.\ J.\ Lett.\ 285 (1984) L45

    work page doi:10.1086/184362 1984

  31. [31]

    Ade et al

    P.A.R. Ade et al. [BICEP and Keck], Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151301 Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 127 (2021) 151301 [2110.00483 https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00483]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.151301 2018

  32. [32]

    Constraints on Inflationary Gravitational Waves with Two Years of SPT-3G Data

    J.A. Zebrowski et al. [SPT-3G], SPT-3G D1: Constraints on inflationary gravitational waves with two years of SPT-3G data, https://doi.org/doi:10.1103/33wm-c6pt Phys.\ Rev.\ D 112 (2025) 123520 [2505.02827 https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02827]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/33wm-c6pt 2025

  33. [33]

    A Probe of Primordial Gravity Waves and Vorticity

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and A. Stebbins, A Probe of Primordial Gravity Waves and Vorticity, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2058 Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 78 (1997) 2058 [astro-ph/9609132 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9609132]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2058 2058

  34. [34]

    Signature of Gravity Waves in Polarization of the Microwave Background

    U. Seljak and M. Zaldarriaga, Signature of Gravity Waves in Polarization of the Microwave Background, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2054 Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 78 (1997) 2054 [astro-ph/9609169 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9609169]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2054 2054

  35. [35]

    Weak Gravitational Lensing of the CMB

    A. Lewis and A. Challinor, Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2006.03.002 Phys.\ Rept.\ 429 (2006) 1 [astro-ph/0601594 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0601594]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.03.002 2006

  36. [36]

    Silk, Cosmic Black-Body Radiation and Galaxy Formation , https://doi.org/10.1086/149449 Astrophys.\ J.\ 151 (1968) 459

    J. Silk, Cosmic Black-Body Radiation and Galaxy Formation , https://doi.org/10.1086/149449 Astrophys.\ J.\ 151 (1968) 459

    work page doi:10.1086/149449 1968

  37. [37]

    Sachs and A.M

    R.K. Sachs and A.M. Wolfe, Perturbations of a cosmological model and angular variations of the microwave background , https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-007-0448-9 Astrophys.\ J.\ 147 (1967) 73

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0448-9 1967

  38. [38]

    Harrison, Fluctuations at the Threshold of Classical Cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.1.2726 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 1 (1970) 2726

    E.R. Harrison, Fluctuations at the Threshold of Classical Cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.1.2726 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 1 (1970) 2726

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.1.2726 1970

  39. [39]

    Zeldovich, A Hypothesis, Unifying the Structure and the Entropy of the Universe, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/160.1.1P Mon.\ Not.\ Roy.\ Astron.\ Soc.\ 160 (1972) 1

    Ya.B. Zeldovich, A Hypothesis, Unifying the Structure and the Entropy of the Universe, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/160.1.1P Mon.\ Not.\ Roy.\ Astron.\ Soc.\ 160 (1972) 1

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/160.1.1p 1972

  40. [40]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al [Planck], Planck 2018 results.\ VI.\ Cosmological parameters, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 641 (2020) A6 ; ibid. 652 (2021) C4 (erratum) [1807.06209 https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06209]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2018

  41. [41]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Y. Akrami et al. [Planck], Planck 2018 results.\ X.\ Constraints on inflation , https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 641 (2020) A10 [1807.06211 https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06211]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 2018

  42. [42]

    T. Louis et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and CDM parameters , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/062 JCAP 11 (2025) 062 [2503.14452 https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14452]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/062 2025

  43. [43]

    Acoustic Signatures in the Primary Microwave Background Bispectrum

    E. Komatsu and D.N. Spergel, Acoustic signatures in the primary microwave background bispectrum, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.63.063002 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 63 (2001) 063002 [astro-ph/0005036 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0005036]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.63.063002 2001

  44. [44]

    Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity

    Y. Akrami et al. [Planck], Planck 2018 results.\ IX.\ Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935891 Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 641 (2020) A9 [1905.05697 https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.05697]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935891 2018

  45. [45]

    The inflationary prediction for primordial non-gaussianity

    D.H. Lyth and Y. Rodr\'iguez, Inflationary Prediction for Primordial Non-Gaussianity , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.121302 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 121302 [astro-ph/0504045 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0504045]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.121302 2005

  46. [46]

    Andrews et al

    A. Andrews et al. [Euclid], Euclid: Field-level inference of primordial non-Gaussianity and cosmic initial conditions , 2412.11945 https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11945

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Constraining Isocurvature Fluctuations with the Planck Surveyor

    K. Enqvist and H. Kurki-Suonio, Constraining isocurvature fluctuations with the Planck Surveyor , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.61.043002 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 61 (2000) 043002 [astro-ph/9907221 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9907221]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.043002 2000

  48. [48]

    Zeldovich and R.A

    Ya.B. Zeldovich and R.A. Sunyaev, The interaction of matter and radiation in a hot-model universe, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00661821 Astrophys.\ Space Sci.\ 4 (1969) 301

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00661821 1969

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    J. Chluba and R.A. Sunyaev, The evolution of CMB spectral distortions in the early Universe, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19786.x Mon.\ Not.\ Roy.\ Astron.\ Soc.\ 419 (2012) 1294 [1109.6552 https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.6552]

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19786.x 2011

  50. [50]

    The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE/FIRAS Data Set

    D.J. Fixsen, E.S. Cheng, J.M. Gales, J.C. Mather, R.A. Shafer and E.L. Wright, The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE FIRAS Data Set , https://doi.org/10.1086/178173 Astrophys. J. 473 (1996) 576 [astro-ph/9605054 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9605054]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/178173 1996

  51. [51]

    Fabbri and M.D

    R. Fabbri and M.D. Pollock, The effect of primordially produced gravitons upon the anisotropy of the cosmological microwave background radiation, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(83)91322-9 Phys.\ Lett.\ B 125 (1983) 445

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)91322-9 1983

  52. [52]

    Polnarev, Polarization and Anisotropy Induced in the Microwave Background by Cosmological Gravitational Waves , Sov.\ Astron.\ 29 (1985) 607

    A.G. Polnarev, Polarization and Anisotropy Induced in the Microwave Background by Cosmological Gravitational Waves , Sov.\ Astron.\ 29 (1985) 607

    work page 1985

  53. [53]

    E. Calabrese et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 constraints on extended cosmological models , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/063 JCAP 11 (2025) 063 [2503.14454 https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14454]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/063 2025

  54. [54]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    G. Agazie et al. , The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6 Astrophys.\ J.\ Lett.\ 951 (2023) L8 [2306.16213 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16213]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6 2041

  55. [55]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals

    J. Antoniadis et al. , The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346844 Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 678 (2023) A50 [2306.16214 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16214]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346844 2023

  56. [56]

    Search for an isotropic gravitational-wave background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array

    D.J. Reardon et al. , Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdd02 Astrophys.\ J.\ Lett.\ 951 (2023) L6 [2306.16215 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16215]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdd02 2041

  57. [57]

    Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

    H. Xu et al. , Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/acdfa5 Res.\ Astron.\ Astrophys.\ 23 (2023) 075024 [2306.16216 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16216]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1674-4527/acdfa5 2023

  58. [58]

    Terrestrial Very-Long-Baseline Atom Interferometry: Workshop Summary

    S. Abend et al. , Terrestrial very-long-baseline atom interferometry: Workshop summary, https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0185291 AVS Quantum Sci.\ 6 (2024) 024701 [2310.08183 https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08183]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1116/5.0185291 2024

  59. [59]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    M. Colpi et al., LISA Definition Study Report, 2402.07571 https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07571

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    LISA Sensitivity and SNR Calculations

    S. Babak, A. Petiteau and M. Hewitson, LISA Sensitivity and SNR Calculations , 2108.01167 https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.01167

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Gravitational Wave Astronomy With TianQin

    E.-K. Li et al., Gravitational wave astronomy with TianQin, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/adc9be Rept.\ Prog.\ Phys.\ 88 (2025) 056901 [2409.19665 https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.19665]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6633/adc9be 2025

  62. [62]

    S. Kawamura et al., Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptab019 PTEP 2021 (2021) 05A105 [2006.13545 https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.13545]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/ptep/ptab019 2021

  63. [63]

    D. Reitze et al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S.\ Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull.\ Am.\ Astron.\ Soc.\ 51 (2019) 035 [1907.04833 https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04833]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    Science Case for the Einstein Telescope

    M. Maggiore et al., Science case for the Einstein telescope, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/050 JCAP 03 (2020) 050 [1912.02622 https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02622]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/050 2020

  65. [65]

    Challenges and Opportunities of Gravitational Wave Searches at MHz to GHz Frequencies

    N. Aggarwal et al. , Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-021-00032-5 Living Rev.\ Rel.\ 24 (2021) 4 [2011.12414 https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.12414]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s41114-021-00032-5 2021

  66. [66]

    Alpher, H

    R.A. Alpher, H. Bethe and G. Gamow, The Origin of Chemical Elements , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.73.803 Phys.\ Rev.\ 73 (1948) 803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.73.803 1948

  67. [67]

    Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis After Planck

    B.D. Fields, K.A. Olive, T.H. Yeh and C. Young, Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis after Planck , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/010 JCAP\ 03 (2020) 010 ; ibid. 11 (2020) E02 (erratum) [1912.01132 https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.01132]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/010 2020

  68. [68]

    A precision calculation of relic neutrino decoupling

    K. Akita and M. Yamaguchi, A precision calculation of relic neutrino decoupling, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/08/012 JCAP 08 (2020) 012 [2005.07047 https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.07047]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/08/012 2020

  69. [69]

    Neutrino decoupling including flavour oscillations and primordial nucleosynthesis

    J. Froustey, C. Pitrou and M.C. Volpe, Neutrino decoupling including flavour oscillations and primordial nucleosynthesis, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/015 JCAP 12 (2020) 015 [2008.01074 https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.01074]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/015 2020

  70. [70]

    Towards a precision calculation of $N_{\rm eff}$ in the Standard Model II: Neutrino decoupling in the presence of flavour oscillations and finite-temperature QED

    J.J. Bennett, G. Buldgen, P.F. De Salas, M. Drewes, S. Gariazzo, S. Pastor and Y.Y.Y. Wong, Towards a precision calculation of N_ eff in the Standard Model. Part II. Neutrino decoupling in the presence of flavour oscillations and finite-temperature QED, https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/073 JCAP 04 (2021) 073 [2012.02726 https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.02726]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/073 2021

  71. [71]

    Escudero, G

    M. Escudero, G. Jackson, M. Laine and S. Sandner, Fast and flexible neutrino decoupling. Part I. The Standard Model , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/046 JCAP 02 (2026) 046 [2511.04747 https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04747]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/046 2026

  72. [72]

    Laine, M

    M. Laine, M. Meyer and Y. Schr\"oder, Data for the Standard Model equation of state, http://laine.itp.unibe.ch/eos15/ http://laine.itp.unibe.ch/eos15/

    work page

  73. [73]

    Bardeen, Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.1882 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 22 (1980) 1882

    J.M. Bardeen, Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.1882 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 22 (1980) 1882

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.1882 1980

  74. [74]

    The Dynamics of General Relativity

    R.L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C.W. Misner, The dynamics of general relativity , https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-008-0661-1 Gen.\ Rel.\ Grav.\ 40 (2008) 1997 [gr-qc/0405109 https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0405109]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s10714-008-0661-1 2008

  75. [75]

    Lifshitz and L.P

    E.M. Lifshitz and L.P. Pitaevskii, Statistical Physics, Part 2 , 88-89 (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1980)

    work page 1980

  76. [76]

    The Bulk Viscosity of High-Temperature QCD

    P.B. Arnold, C. Dogan and G.D. Moore, Bulk viscosity of high-temperature QCD, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.085021 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 74 (2006) 085021 [hep-ph/0608012 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0608012]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.085021 2006

  77. [77]

    Bulk Viscous Cosmology

    W. Zimdahl, Bulk viscous cosmology, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.5483 Phys.\ Rev.\ D 53 (1996) 5483 [astro-ph/9601189 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9601189]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.53.5483 1996

  78. [78]

    Relativistic Theory of Hydrodynamic Fluctuations with Applications to Heavy Ion Collisions

    J.I. Kapusta, B. M\"uller and M. Stephanov, Relativistic theory of hydrodynamic fluctuations with applications to heavy-ion collisions, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.054906 Phys.\ Rev.\ C 85 (2012) 054906 [1112.6405 https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.6405]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.85.054906 2012

  79. [79]

    Transport coefficients in high temperature gauge theories: (I) Leading-log results

    P.B. Arnold, G.D. Moore and L.G. Yaffe, Transport coefficients in high temperature gauge theories (I): leading-log results, https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2000/11/001 JHEP 11 (2000) 001 [hep-ph/0010177 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0010177]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/11/001 2000

  80. [80]

    Hiscock and L

    W.A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Stability and causality in dissipative relativistic fluids, https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(83)90288-9 Annals Phys.\ 151 (1983) 466

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(83)90288-9 1983

Showing first 80 references.