pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.14115 · v1 · pith:A4PEFPAMnew · submitted 2026-06-12 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Hydrodynamics of Nonminimal F^((a)α β) F^((a)γ λ) R_(α γ) R_(β λ) AdS Black Brane

Mehdi Sadeghi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 11:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords nonminimal couplingAdS black braneholographic conductivityshear viscosityfluid-gravity correspondenceKSS boundnon-Abelian plasmahigher-derivative gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

A nonminimal curvature-gauge coupling in an AdS black brane produces a DC conductivity below the universal bound of 1 for positive coupling strength.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a black brane solution in four-dimensional AdS gravity coupled to Yang-Mills fields with an added higher-derivative interaction between the field strength and the Ricci tensor. It performs this construction perturbatively in the small coefficient q₂ of that interaction and then uses the fluid-gravity correspondence to read off the boundary hydrodynamic coefficients. The resulting expressions show that the DC color conductivity falls below its previous lower bound of 1 whenever q₂ is positive, while the shear viscosity to entropy density ratio receives a linear correction proportional to q₂ times a charge-dependent factor. A sympathetic reader would care because the calculation supplies an explicit, controlled example of how a single higher-derivative term can break the universality of transport coefficients that had appeared robust in minimal Einstein-Maxwell theory. The sign of q₂ determines whether the conductivity bound is violated or preserved and whether the viscosity ratio moves above or below the KSS value.

Core claim

The nonminimal term q₂ F^{(a)αβ} F^{(a)γλ} R_{αγ} R_{βλ} yields the DC color conductivity σ = 1 − q₂ (9κ Q²/(L² r_h⁴) + 7κ² Q⁴/(4 r_h⁸)) and the ratio η/s = (1/(4π)) (1 + q₂ 7κ² Q⁴/(2 r_h⁸)). These formulas are obtained by solving the modified bulk equations to first order in q₂ and mapping the resulting geometry to boundary hydrodynamics; the sign of q₂ controls violation or preservation of the conductivity bound and the direction of the shift in the viscosity ratio.

What carries the argument

The nonminimal interaction term q₂ F^{(a)αβ} F^{(a)γλ} R_{αγ} R_{βλ} that couples the square of the Yang-Mills field strength to the square of the Ricci tensor, together with the fluid-gravity correspondence applied to the first-order perturbative black brane solution.

If this is right

  • The DC conductivity can lie below the value 1 for q₂ > 0, violating the bound that holds for uncharged black holes in Einstein-Maxwell theory.
  • The shear viscosity to entropy density ratio deviates from 1/(4π) by an amount linear in q₂ and proportional to the fourth power of the charge.
  • The conductivity bound remains satisfied when q₂ is negative while the viscosity ratio is shifted in the opposite direction.
  • Both corrections depend explicitly on the horizon radius r_h and the charge parameter Q of the black brane.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analogous nonminimal terms in other dimensions or with different gauge groups could produce similar bound violations and might be checked by repeating the perturbative construction.
  • The linear dependence on q₂ suggests that a full non-perturbative analysis at larger coupling values could reveal whether the violations persist or saturate.
  • The explicit formulas allow direct comparison with numerical solutions of the bulk equations for chosen values of q₂, providing a concrete test of the perturbative result.
  • Transport coefficients other than conductivity and shear viscosity could be computed in the same background to see whether the nonminimal term affects them uniformly.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbative expansion in small q₂ remains valid and the fluid-gravity correspondence maps the corrected bulk solution to boundary hydrodynamics without additional higher-order terms becoming important.

What would settle it

Solve the full nonlinear equations of motion for a specific nonzero value of q₂ > 0, extract the DC conductivity from the resulting geometry, and check whether the value lies below 1.

read the original abstract

We investigate the hydrodynamic properties of a strongly coupled non-Abelian plasma dual to a four-dimensional AdS black brane with a nonminimal coupling of the form $q_2 F^{(a)\alpha\beta}F^{(a)\gamma\lambda}R_{\alpha\gamma}R_{\beta\lambda}$ in the bulk action. This higher-derivative term introduces a direct interaction between the Yang-Mills field strength and the Ricci tensor, leading to corrections beyond the minimal Einstein-Yang-Mills theory. Using a perturbative expansion in the small coupling $q_2$, we construct the black brane solution up to first order and employ the fluid-gravity correspondence to compute two key transport coefficients: the DC color conductivity $\sigma$ and the shear viscosity to entropy density ratio $\eta/s$. In holography, $\eta/s$ is inversely proportional to the square of the coupling constant of the boundary theory, while $\sigma$ in Einstein-Maxwell theory satisfies a universal lower bound $\sigma \ge 1$ (in units where $\hbar=1$), saturated for uncharged black holes and characterizing a perfect quantum critical fluid. Our results reveal that the nonminimal coupling significantly alters these transport quantities. For the DC conductivity, we find $\sigma = 1 - q_2 \bigl(9\kappa Q^2/(L^2 r_h^4) + 7\kappa^2 Q^4/(4 r_h^8)\bigr)$, indicating a violation of the conductivity bound for $q_2>0$ while the bound is preserved for $q_2<0$. For the shear viscosity, we obtain $\eta/s = (1/(4\pi))\bigl(1 + q_2\, 7\kappa^2 Q^4/(2 r_h^8)\bigr)$, showing that the KSS bound is modified by a term linear in $q_2$. The sign of $q_2$ determines whether the ratio increases above or decreases below the universal value $1/(4\pi)$. These findings highlight the sensitivity of holographic transport to curvature-coupled gauge interactions and provide a controlled example of how higher-derivative corrections influence the hydrodynamic regime of strongly coupled plasmas.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to investigate hydrodynamic transport in a holographic non-Abelian plasma dual to a 4D AdS black brane whose bulk action includes the nonminimal higher-derivative interaction q₂ F^{(a)αβ} F^{(a)γλ} R_{αγ} R_{βλ}. A perturbative expansion in small q₂ is used to construct the charged black-brane background to first order; the fluid-gravity correspondence is then applied to extract the DC color conductivity σ = 1 − q₂ (9κ Q²/(L² r_h⁴) + 7κ² Q⁴/(4 r_h⁸)) and the ratio η/s = (1/(4π)) (1 + q₂ 7κ² Q⁴/(2 r_h⁸)). These expressions are asserted to violate the conductivity bound for q₂ > 0 while linearly modifying the KSS bound.

Significance. If the perturbative solution and its mapping to boundary hydrodynamics are correct, the work supplies an explicit, controlled example of how curvature-coupled gauge interactions can produce linear corrections that violate or modify standard holographic bounds on transport. The results are directly falsifiable by future numerical or analytic checks and illustrate the sensitivity of hydrodynamic coefficients to higher-derivative bulk terms beyond the minimal Einstein-Yang-Mills theory.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the paragraph describing the perturbative construction: the quoted expressions for σ and η/s are presented as the direct output of the O(q₂) solution, yet no explicit form of the corrected metric and gauge-field components, no residual EOM source terms at linear order, and no verification that the first-order correction satisfies the modified Einstein-Yang-Mills equations exactly are supplied. Because the central claim rests on these corrections being the complete leading contributions, the absence of this check is load-bearing.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on fluid-gravity application): the nonminimal FFRR term could in principle generate additional O(∂) structures in the boundary stress tensor or current that would alter the leading transport coefficients beyond the quoted linear terms; the manuscript does not demonstrate that such contributions are absent or cancel at the order considered.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The normalization conventions for the Yang-Mills field strength, the parameter κ, the charge Q, and the horizon radius r_h are used without an early explicit statement; a brief reminder of these definitions would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for highlighting the need for greater explicitness in the perturbative construction and its hydrodynamic mapping. We address the two major comments below and will incorporate the requested verifications into a revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the paragraph describing the perturbative construction: the quoted expressions for σ and η/s are presented as the direct output of the O(q₂) solution, yet no explicit form of the corrected metric and gauge-field components, no residual EOM source terms at linear order, and no verification that the first-order correction satisfies the modified Einstein-Yang-Mills equations exactly are supplied. Because the central claim rests on these corrections being the complete leading contributions, the absence of this check is load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit display of the O(q₂) metric and gauge-field corrections, together with the residual source terms and their cancellation in the linearized Einstein-Yang-Mills equations, would strengthen the presentation. Although the solution procedure is outlined in Section 3, the explicit component forms and the verification step were omitted for brevity. We will add these as a short appendix (or expanded subsection) in the revised version, confirming that the first-order correction satisfies the modified equations exactly at linear order in q₂. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on fluid-gravity application): the nonminimal FFRR term could in principle generate additional O(∂) structures in the boundary stress tensor or current that would alter the leading transport coefficients beyond the quoted linear terms; the manuscript does not demonstrate that such contributions are absent or cancel at the order considered.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not explicitly demonstrate the absence of new O(∂) structures induced by the nonminimal term. In the fluid-gravity calculation the background is corrected only to O(q₂) while the metric and gauge perturbations are taken to first order in boundary derivatives; the FFRR interaction, being quadratic in the field strength and curvature, produces no additional independent tensor structures at O(∂) once the background equations are satisfied. We will add a clarifying paragraph (or short calculation) showing that any potential new contributions either vanish or are absorbed into the already-quoted linear corrections to σ and η/s. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; perturbative solution and fluid-gravity map are independent of target results

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by expanding the modified Einstein-Yang-Mills action to linear order in the coupling q2, solving the resulting bulk equations for the black-brane background, and then mapping the solution via the standard fluid-gravity dictionary to boundary transport coefficients. No parameter is fitted to the final σ or η/s expressions, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that forces the quoted corrections, and the reported formulas are direct outputs of that calculation rather than redefinitions of inputs. The approach is self-contained and does not reduce the claimed results to the inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the fluid-gravity map for a nonminimal bulk action, the existence of a black-brane solution at linear order in q₂, and standard AdS/CFT dictionary entries; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • q₂
    Small coupling constant controlling the strength of the nonminimal term; the reported expressions are linear in q₂.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Fluid-gravity correspondence maps bulk black-brane perturbations to boundary hydrodynamic transport coefficients.
    Invoked to extract σ and η/s from the corrected geometry.
  • domain assumption Perturbative solution in small q₂ is sufficient and higher-order terms can be neglected.
    Stated as the method used to construct the black brane.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5960 in / 1460 out tokens · 33177 ms · 2026-06-30T11:02:58.881063+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 27 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Zur Theorie der Elementarteilchen

    W. Scherrer, “Zur Theorie der Elementarteilchen”, Verhandlungen der Schweiz- erischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft121, 86 (1941)

    1941

  2. [2]

    Zur projektiven Relativit¨ atstheorie

    P. Jordan, “Zur projektiven Relativit¨ atstheorie”, Nachr. Akad. Wiss. G¨ ottingen II, Math.-Phys. Kl.1945, 39 (1945)

    1945

  3. [3]

    Les equations de la th´ eorie unitaire de Kaluza

    Y. Thiry, “Les equations de la th´ eorie unitaire de Kaluza”, Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci.226, 216 (1948)

    1948

  4. [4]

    Mach’s principle and a relativistic theory of gravi- tation

    C. H. Brans and R. H. Dicke, “Mach’s principle and a relativistic theory of gravi- tation”, Phys. Rev.124, 925 (1961)

    1961

  5. [5]

    Some remarks on the genesis of scalar-tensor theories

    H. F. M. Goenner, “On the history of unified field theories. Part II. (ca. 1930 – ca. 1965)”, Living Rev. Relativity17, 5 (2014). See also, H. F. M. Goenner, “Some 17 remarks on the genesis of scalar-tensor theories”, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.44, 2077 (2012); arXiv:1204.3455 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1930

  6. [6]

    A new improved energy-momentum tensor

    C. Callan, S. Coleman, and R. Jackiw, “A new improved energy-momentum tensor” Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)59, 42 (1970)

    1970

  7. [7]

    Conformal transformations in classical gravitational theories and in cosmology

    V. Faraoni, E. Gunzig, and P. Nardone, “Conformal transformations in classical gravitational theories and in cosmology”, Fundam. Cosm. Phys.20, 121 (1999); arXiv:gr-qc/9811047

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  8. [8]

    A new invariant for electromagnetic fields in curved space-time

    A. R. Prasanna, “A new invariant for electromagnetic fields in curved space-time”, Phys. Lett. A37, 331 (1971)

    1971

  9. [9]

    QED vacuum polarization in a background gravitational field and its effect on the velocity of photons

    I. T. Drummond and S. J. Hathrell, “QED vacuum polarization in a background gravitational field and its effect on the velocity of photons”, prd22, 343 (1980)

    1980

  10. [10]

    How does the electromagnetic field couple to gravity, in particular to metric, nonmetricity, torsion, and curvature?

    F. W. Hehl and Yu. N. Obukhov, “How does the electromagnetic field couple to gravity, in particular to metric, nonmetricity, torsion, and curvature?”, inGy- ros, Clocks, Interferometers...: Testing relativistic gravity in space, edited by C. L¨ ammerzahl, C. W. F. Everitt, and F. W. Hehl, Lect. Notes Phys.562, 479 (2001); arXiv:gr-qc/0001010

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  11. [11]

    Non-minimal coupling for the gravitational and electromagnetic fields: A general system of equations

    A. B. Balakin and J. P. S. Lemos, “Non-minimal coupling for the gravitational and electromagnetic fields: A general system of equations”, Classical Quantum Gravity 22, 1867 (2005); arXiv:gr-qc/0503076

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  12. [12]

    Conservation of charge and second-order gauge-tensor field theories

    G. W. Horndeski, “Conservation of charge and second-order gauge-tensor field theories”, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal.75, 229 (1981)

    1981

  13. [13]

    Modification of Einstein–Yang-Mills theory from dimensional reduction of the Gauss-Bonnet action

    F. M¨ uller-Hoissen, “Modification of Einstein–Yang-Mills theory from dimensional reduction of the Gauss-Bonnet action”, Classical Quantum Gravity5, L35 (1988)

    1988

  14. [14]

    Sadeghi and F

    M. Sadeghi and F. Rahmani, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39, no.02n03, 2450010 (2024) doi:10.1142/S0217751X24500106 [arXiv:2306.05231 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x24500106 2024

  15. [15]

    Sadeghi, Mod

    M. Sadeghi, Mod. Phys. Lett. A38, no.20n21, 2350098 (2023) doi:10.1142/S0217732323500980 [arXiv:2302.07247 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732323500980 2023

  16. [16]

    Thermodynamic Behavior of a 4D Nonminimal Maxwell-AdS Black Hole

    M. Sadeghi and F. Rahmani, Class. Quant. Grav.42, no.21, 215008 (2025) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ae128a [arXiv:2412.08337 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ae128a 2025

  17. [17]

    Sadeghi, Class

    M. Sadeghi, Class. Quant. Grav.40, no.19, 195002 (2023) doi:10.1088/1361- 6382/acf020 [arXiv:2210.06584 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361- 2023

  18. [18]

    Non-minimal Einstein-Yang-Mills-Higgs theory: Associated, color and color-acoustic metrics for the Wu-Yang monopole model

    A. B. Balakin, H. Dehnen, and A. E. Zayats, “Nonminimal Einstein–Yang- Mills–Higgs theory: Associated, color and color-acoustic metrics for the Wu–Yang monopole model”, prd76, 124011 (2007); arXiv:0710.5070 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  19. [19]

    Nonminimal isotropic cosmological model with Yang-Mills and Higgs fields

    A. B. Balakin, H. Dehnen, and A. E. Zayats, “Non-minimal isotropic cosmological model with Yang-Mills and Higgs fields”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D17, 1255 (2008); arXiv:0710.4992 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  20. [20]

    Non-minimal coupling of photons and axions

    A. B. Balakin and W.-T. Ni, “Non-minimal coupling of photons and axions”, Classical Quantum Gravity27, 055003 (2010); arXiv:0911.2946 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  21. [21]

    J. M. Maldacena, Int. J. Theor. Phys.38(1999) 1113 [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2(1998) 231] [hep-th/9711200]. 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  22. [22]

    Large N Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, Phys. Rept. 323, 183-386 (2000) doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00083-6 [arXiv:hep-th/9905111 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(99)00083-6 2000

  23. [23]

    Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity

    S. Bhattacharyya, V. E. Hubeny, S. Minwalla and M. Rangamani, JHEP02, 045 (2008) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/045 [arXiv:0712.2456 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/045 2008

  24. [25]

    Viscosity in Strongly Interacting Quantum Field Theories from Black Hole Physics

    P. Kovtun, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 111601 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.111601 [arXiv:hep-th/0405231 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.111601 2005

  25. [26]

    Viscosity, Black Holes, and Quantum Field Theory

    D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Viscosity, Black Holes, and Quantum Field The- ory,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57, 95 (2007) [arXiv:0704.0240 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  26. [27]

    Metallic AdS/CFT,

    A. Karch and A. O’Bannon, “Metallic AdS/CFT,”JHEP, vol. 2007, no. 09, p. 024, 2007

    2007

  27. [28]

    Minkowski-space correlators in AdS/CFT corre- spondence: recipe and applications,

    D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Minkowski-space correlators in AdS/CFT corre- spondence: recipe and applications,”JHEP, vol. 2002, no. 09, p. 042, 2002

    2002

  28. [29]

    What RHIC experiments and theory tell us about properties of quark-gluon plasma?,

    E. Shuryak, “What RHIC experiments and theory tell us about properties of quark-gluon plasma?,”Nucl. Phys. A, vol. 750, pp. 64–83, 2005

    2005

  29. [30]

    Absence of disorder-driven metal-insulator transitions in simple holographic models

    S. Grozdanov, A. Lucas, S. Sachdev and K. Schalm, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, no.22, 221601 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.221601 [arXiv:1507.00003 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.221601 2015

  30. [31]

    On holographic disorder-driven metal-insulator transitions

    M. Baggioli and O. Pujolas, JHEP01, 040 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2017)040 [arXiv:1601.07897 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2017)040 2017

  31. [32]

    On Effective Holographic Mott Insulators

    M. Baggioli and O. Pujolas, JHEP12, 107 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2016)107 [arXiv:1604.08915 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2016)107 2016

  32. [33]

    Effective holographic theories of momentum relaxation and violation of conductivity bound

    B. Gout´ eraux, E. Kiritsis and W. J. Li, JHEP04, 122 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2016)122 [arXiv:1602.01067 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2016)122 2016

  33. [34]

    Conductivity bound from dirty black holes

    K. Bitaghsir Fadafan, Phys. Lett. B762, 399-403 (2016) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.09.056 [arXiv:1602.05943 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.09.056 2016

  34. [35]

    X. H. Ge, S. J. Sin and S. F. Wu, Phys. Lett. B767, 63-68 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.056 [arXiv:1512.01917 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.056 2017

  35. [36]

    Holographic shear viscosity to entropy ratio in higher derivative gravity,

    S. Jain, S. Kumar, and M. Sharma, “Holographic shear viscosity to entropy ratio in higher derivative gravity,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 736, pp. 319–324, 2014

    2014

  36. [37]

    Effective field theory from quantized strings,

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Effective field theory from quantized strings,” Phys. Lett. B158(1985) 316

    1985

  37. [38]

    Direct curvature Yang-Mills field couplings induced by the Kaluza-Klein reduction of Euler form actions in seven dimensions,

    T. Dereli and G. ¨U¸ coluk, “Direct curvature Yang-Mills field couplings induced by the Kaluza-Klein reduction of Euler form actions in seven dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav.7(1990) 533

    1990

  38. [39]

    Regular nonminimal magnetic black holes in spacetimes with a cosmological constant

    A. B. Balakin, J. P. S. Lemos and A. E. Zayats, “Regular nonminimal magnetic black holes in spacetimes with a cosmological constant,” Phys. Rev. D93, no.2, 024008 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.024008 [arXiv:1512.02653 [gr-qc]]. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.024008 2016

  39. [40]

    Son, Hydrodynamics and gauge/gravity duality, Nuclear Physics B (Proc

    D.T. Son, Hydrodynamics and gauge/gravity duality, Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.) 192–193 (2009) 113–118

    2009

  40. [41]

    Shear viscosity of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma

    G. Policastro, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “The Shear viscosity of strongly coupledN= 4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma,” Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 081601 (2001) [hep-th/0104066]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  41. [42]

    From AdS/CFT correspondence to hydrodynamics

    G. Policastro, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, JHEP09, 043 (2002) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/09/043 [arXiv:hep-th/0205052 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/09/043 2002

  42. [43]

    The effect of three matters on KSS bound,

    M. Sadeghi, “The effect of three matters on KSS bound,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A39, no.01, 2350181 (2024) doi:10.1142/S021773232350181X [arXiv:2203.16849 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s021773232350181x 2024

  43. [44]

    Hydrodynamics of a Black Brane in Gauss-Bonnet Massive Gravity

    M. Sadeghi and S. Parvizi, “Hydrodynamics of a black brane in Gauss–Bonnet massive gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav.33, no.3, 035005 (2016) doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/33/3/035005 [arXiv:1507.07183 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264- 2016

  44. [45]

    Entropy production, viscosity bounds and bumpy black holes

    S. A. Hartnoll, D. M. Ramirez and J. E. Santos, “Entropy produc- tion, viscosity bounds and bumpy black holes,” JHEP03, 170 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2016)170 [arXiv:1601.02757 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2016)170 2016

  45. [46]

    Holographic Aspects of a Higher Curvature Massive Gravity

    S. Parvizi and M. Sadeghi, Eur. Phys. J. C79, no.2, 113 (2019) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6631-9 [arXiv:1704.00441 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6631-9 2019

  46. [47]

    Viscosity bound violation in holographic solids and the viscoelastic response

    L. Alberte, M. Baggioli and O. Pujolas, JHEP07, 074 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2016)074 [arXiv:1601.03384 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2016)074 2016

  47. [48]

    Einstein-Yang-Mills AdS Black Brane Solution in Massive Gravity and Viscosity Bound

    M. Sadeghi, Eur. Phys. J. C78, no.10, 875 (2018) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018- 6360-5 [arXiv:1810.09242 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018- 2018

  48. [49]

    Sadeghi, Phys

    M. Sadeghi, Phys. Lett. B875, 140342 (2026) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140342 [arXiv:2602.05985 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140342 2026

  49. [50]

    A. J. Ferreira–Martins, P. Meert and R. da Rocha, Nucl. Phys. B957, 115087 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115087 [arXiv:1912.04837 [hep-th]]. 20

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115087 2020