Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 minor 1 cited by

Towards the two-loop electroweak corrections to the Drell-Yan process: the complete fermionic contributions

T0 review · 0 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The complete set of two-loop fermionic virtual corrections to the Drell-Yan process has been computed and rendered finite.

desk verdict This paper delivers the complete fermionic two-loop virtual corrections to Drell-Yan as a UV-renormalised and IR-subtracted finite piece, using an automated method with explicit tests. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.28667 v1 pith:AAA52H5X submitted 2026-05-27 hep-ph hep-th

Tommaso Armadillo , Simone Devoto , Michele Dradi , Alessandro Vicini This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-th
keywords Drell-Yanprocesselectroweakcorrectionstwo-loopcalculationsfermioniccontributionsvirtualStandardModelleptonpairproduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper evaluates all second-order virtual corrections involving closed fermionic loops for the process of up-quark annihilation into muon pairs within the electroweak Standard Model. These contributions are ultraviolet-renormalized and infrared-subtracted to yield a finite piece of the cross section. The calculation relies on an automated methodology that the authors test explicitly. Such results supply one required component for next-to-next-to-leading-order electroweak predictions of inclusive lepton-pair production at colliders.

What carries the argument

An automated methodology for evaluating two-loop virtual corrections that include closed fermionic loops in the electroweak Standard Model.

What would settle it

An independent analytic or numerical evaluation of the same complete set of two-loop fermionic diagrams that yields a different finite result after renormalization and subtraction would falsify the presented contribution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We present the ultraviolet-renormalised and infrared-subtracted finite contribution of the complete set of second-order virtual corrections with a closed fermionic loop, to the cross section of the process u u-bar to mu+ mu-. The evaluation of these contributions is based on an automated methodology, whose validity is discussed with explicit tests. These corrections are one of the building blocks necessary for the simulation of the inclusive lepton-pair production cross section at next-to-next-to-leading order in the electroweak interaction.

Load-bearing premise

The automated methodology used to evaluate the corrections is valid, as supported by the explicit tests mentioned in the abstract.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The finite fermionic corrections supply one building block for NNLO electroweak simulations of inclusive lepton-pair production.
  • Explicit tests of the automated methodology support its reliability for these diagrams.
  • The results address the closed-fermion-loop subset of the full two-loop virtual corrections needed for precision cross-section predictions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The remaining two-loop bosonic corrections would need analogous treatment to reach a complete NNLO electroweak result.
  • The same automated approach could be applied to related processes such as vector-boson scattering or Higgs production.
  • Direct numerical comparison against independent implementations of the same diagrams would offer an additional cross-check beyond the tests already performed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes and presents the ultraviolet-renormalised and infrared-subtracted finite remainder arising from the complete set of two-loop virtual diagrams containing at least one closed fermionic loop for the partonic process u ū → μ⁺ μ⁻ in the electroweak Standard Model. The evaluation relies on an automated pipeline whose validity is asserted via explicit tests; the result is positioned explicitly as one necessary building block toward a full NNLO electroweak prediction for inclusive Drell-Yan production.

Significance. If the reported finite remainder is correct, the work supplies a non-trivial component of the two-loop electroweak virtual corrections to a flagship LHC process. Automated methods with documented tests are a positive feature for reproducibility in multi-loop calculations. The contribution remains partial (fermionic loops only), but it is a concrete, falsifiable step that can be cross-checked by independent groups once the full analytic or numeric expressions are released.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to 'explicit tests' of the automated methodology; the main text should include a dedicated subsection (or table) that enumerates the diagram classes, the IR subtraction scheme, and the numerical or analytic cross-checks performed, with at least one concrete example of a cancellation or limit test.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript, the positive assessment of its significance, and the recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper presents a direct perturbative computation of the UV-renormalised and IR-subtracted two-loop fermionic virtual corrections to u u-bar to mu+ mu- using an automated methodology whose validity is checked via explicit tests. The central result is the explicit construction of this finite remainder from the complete set of closed-fermion-loop diagrams; no step reduces by construction to a fitted input, a self-citation chain, or a renamed ansatz. The work is positioned only as one building block for a future NNLO calculation, with no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or parameter fit invoked from prior self-work.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard perturbative quantum field theory techniques within the electroweak Standard Model; no free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are mentioned in the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The process is described within the electroweak Standard Model.
    The calculation targets corrections in the SM electroweak sector.
  • standard math Standard ultraviolet renormalization and infrared subtraction procedures apply to render the two-loop amplitudes finite.
    The abstract explicitly refers to UV-renormalised and IR-subtracted finite contributions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards the two-loop electroweak corrections to the Drell-Yan process: the complete fermionic contributions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AAA52H5X

@misc{pith2026260528667,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards the two-loop electroweak corrections to the Drell-Yan process: the complete fermionic contributions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AAA52H5X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.28667}
}
abstract

We discuss the production of a lepton pair in quark-antiquark annihilation in the electroweak Standard Model. We present the ultraviolet-renormalised and infrared-subtracted finite contribution of the complete set of second-order virtual corrections with a closed fermionic loop, to the cross section of the process $u\bar u\to \mu^+\mu^-$. The evaluation of these contributions is based on an automated methodology, whose validity is discussed with explicit tests. These corrections are one of the building blocks necessary for the simulation of the inclusive lepton-pair production cross section at next-to-next-to-leading order in the electroweak interaction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Feynman Integrals Meet Second-Order Partial Differential Equations

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Feynman integrals can be solved globally over phase space by rewriting them as second-order PDE equilibrium problems and discretizing with finite elements.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [2]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman,Combinatorics of gauge fields,Nucl. Phys. B50(1972) 318–353

    1972

  2. [3]

    Becchi, A

    C. Becchi, A. Rouet and R. Stora,Renormalization of the Abelian Higgs-Kibble Model, Commun. Math. Phys.42(1975) 127–162

    1975

  3. [4]

    Becchi, A

    C. Becchi, A. Rouet and R. Stora,Renormalization of Gauge Theories,Annals Phys.98 (1976) 287–321

    1976

  4. [5]

    D. A. Ross and J. C. Taylor,Renormalization of a unified theory of weak and electromagnetic interactions,Nucl. Phys. B51(1973) 125–144

    1973

  5. [6]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman,Scalar One Loop Integrals,Nucl. Phys. B153(1979) 365–401

    1979

  6. [7]

    Precision Electroweak Measurements on the Z Resonance

    G. Passarino and M. J. G. Veltman,One Loop Corrections for e+ e- Annihilation Into mu+ mu- in the Weinberg Model,Nucl. Phys. B160(1979) 151–207. [8]ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Groupcollaboration, S. Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on theZresonance,Phys. Rept.427(20...

    work page Pith review arXiv 1979

  7. [8]

    D. Y. Bardin et al.,Electroweak working group report, inWorkshop Group on Precision Calculations for the Z Resonance (2nd meeting held Mar 31, 3rd meeting held Jun 13), 9, 1997,hep-ph/9709229. – 29 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  8. [9]

    Sirlin,Radiative Corrections in the SU(2)-L x U(1) Theory: A Simple Renormalization Framework,Phys

    A. Sirlin,Radiative Corrections in the SU(2)-L x U(1) Theory: A Simple Renormalization Framework,Phys. Rev.D22(1980) 971–981

    1980

Show all 75 references
  1. [10]

    W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin,Radiative Corrections to Neutrino Induced Neutral Current Phenomena in the SU(2)-L x U(1) Theory,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 2695

    1980

  2. [11]

    Dubovyk, A

    I. Dubovyk, A. Freitas, J. Gluza, T. Riemann and J. Usovitsch,Electroweak pseudo-observables and Z-boson form factors at two-loop accuracy,JHEP08(2019) 113, [1906.08815]

    2019

  3. [12]

    C. Duhr, F. Dulat and B. Mistlberger,Drell-Yan Cross Section to Third Order in the Strong Coupling Constant,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 172001, [2001.07717]

    2020

  4. [13]

    C. Duhr, F. Dulat and B. Mistlberger,Charged current Drell-Yan production at N 3LO, JHEP11(2020) 143, [2007.13313]

    2020

  5. [14]

    Duhr and B

    C. Duhr and B. Mistlberger,Lepton-pair production at hadron colliders at N 3LO in QCD, JHEP03(2022) 116, [2111.10379]

    2022

  6. [15]

    Dittmaier and M

    S. Dittmaier and M. Kr¨ amer,Electroweak radiative corrections to W boson production at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 073007, [hep-ph/0109062]

    2002 arXiv

  7. [16]

    Baur and D

    U. Baur and D. Wackeroth,Electroweak radiative corrections top¯p→W ± →ℓ ±νbeyond the pole approximation,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 073015, [hep-ph/0405191]

    2004 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Zykunov,Radiative corrections to the Drell-Yan process at large dilepton invariant masses,Phys

    V. Zykunov,Radiative corrections to the Drell-Yan process at large dilepton invariant masses,Phys. Atom. Nucl.69(2006) 1522

    2006

  9. [18]

    Arbuzov, D

    A. Arbuzov, D. Bardin, S. Bondarenko, P. Christova, L. Kalinovskaya, G. Nanava and R. Sadykov,One-loop corrections to the Drell-Yan process in SANC. I. The Charged current case,Eur. Phys. J. C46(2006) 407–412, [hep-ph/0506110]

    2006 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Carloni Calame, G

    C. Carloni Calame, G. Montagna, O. Nicrosini and A. Vicini,Precision electroweak calculation of the charged current Drell-Yan process,JHEP12(2006) 016, [hep-ph/0609170]

    2006 arXiv

  11. [20]

    U. Baur, O. Brein, W. Hollik, C. Schappacher and D. Wackeroth,Electroweak radiative corrections to neutral current Drell-Yan processes at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) 033007, [hep-ph/0108274]

    2002 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Zykunov,Weak radiative corrections to Drell-Yan process for large invariant mass of di-lepton pair,Phys

    V. Zykunov,Weak radiative corrections to Drell-Yan process for large invariant mass of di-lepton pair,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 073019, [hep-ph/0509315]

    2007 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Carloni Calame, G

    C. Carloni Calame, G. Montagna, O. Nicrosini and A. Vicini,Precision electroweak calculation of the production of a high transverse-momentum lepton pair at hadron colliders, JHEP10(2007) 109, [0710.1722]

    2007 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Arbuzov, D

    A. Arbuzov, D. Bardin, S. Bondarenko, P. Christova, L. Kalinovskaya, G. Nanava and R. Sadykov,One-loop corrections to the Drell–Yan process in SANC. (II). The Neutral current case,Eur. Phys. J. C54(2008) 451–460, [0711.0625]

    2008 arXiv

  15. [24]

    Dittmaier and M

    S. Dittmaier and M. Huber,Radiative corrections to the neutral-current Drell-Yan process in the Standard Model and its minimal supersymmetric extension,JHEP01(2010) 060, [0911.2329]

    2010 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Bonciani, L

    R. Bonciani, L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, N. Rana, F. Tramontano and A. Vicini, Mixed Strong-Electroweak Corrections to the Drell-Yan Process,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 012002, [2106.11953]. – 30 –

    2022

  17. [26]

    Buccioni, F

    F. Buccioni, F. Caola, H. A. Chawdhry, F. Devoto, M. Heller, A. von Manteuffel, K. Melnikov, R. R¨ ontsch and C. Signorile-Signorile,Mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to dilepton production at the LHC in the high invariant mass region,JHEP06(2022) 022, [2203.11237]

    2022

  18. [27]

    Armadillo, R

    T. Armadillo, R. Bonciani, S. Devoto, N. Rana and A. Vicini,Two-loop mixed QCD-EW corrections to charged current Drell-Yan,JHEP07(2024) 265, [2405.00612]

    2024

  19. [28]

    Ciafaloni and D

    P. Ciafaloni and D. Comelli,Sudakov enhancement of electroweak corrections,Phys. Lett. B 446(1999) 278–284, [hep-ph/9809321]

    1999 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Denner and S

    A. Denner and S. Pozzorini,One loop leading logarithms in electroweak radiative corrections

  21. [30]

    Results,Eur. Phys. J. C18(2001) 461–480, [hep-ph/0010201]

    2001 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Denner, B

    A. Denner, B. Jantzen and S. Pozzorini,Two-loop electroweak next-to-leading logarithmic corrections to massless fermionic processes,Nucl. Phys. B761(2007) 1–62, [hep-ph/0608326]

    2007 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Denner and S

    A. Denner and S. Rode,Automated resummation of electroweak Sudakov logarithms in diboson production at future colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 542, [2402.10503]

    2024

  24. [33]

    de Blas, Y

    J. de Blas, Y. Du, C. Grojean, J. Gu, V. Miralles, M. E. Peskin, J. Tian, M. Vos and E. Vryonidou,Global SMEFT Fits at Future Colliders, inSnowmass 2021, 6, 2022, 2206.08326. [35]FCCcollaboration, M. Benedikt et al.,Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 1, ...

    2021

  25. [34]

    Armadillo, E

    T. Armadillo, E. Celada, J. ter Hoeve, F. Maltoni, L. Mantani, J. Rojo, A. N. Rossia, S. Tentori, M. O. A. Thomas and E. Vryonidou,New Physics Reach through Precision at Future Colliders: a Multi-Pronged Approach,2604.16596

    arXiv

  26. [35]

    Jantzen, J

    B. Jantzen, J. H. Kuhn, A. A. Penin and V. A. Smirnov,Two-loop electroweak logarithms in four-fermion processes at high energy,Nucl. Phys. B731(2005) 188–212, [hep-ph/0509157]

    2005 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Pagani and M

    D. Pagani and M. Zaro,One-loop electroweak Sudakov logarithms: a revisitation and automation,JHEP02(2022) 161, [2110.03714]

    2022

  28. [37]

    Chiesa, C

    M. Chiesa, C. L. Del Pio and F. Piccinini,On electroweak corrections to neutral current Drell-Yan with the POWHEG BOX,2402.14659

  29. [38]

    Degrassi and A

    G. Degrassi and A. Vicini,Two loop renormalization of the electric charge in the standard model,Phys. Rev.D69(2004) 073007, [hep-ph/0307122]

    2004 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Actis and G

    S. Actis and G. Passarino,Two-Loop Renormalization in the Standard Model Part II: Renormalization Procedures and Computational Techniques,Nucl. Phys. B777(2007) 35–99, [hep-ph/0612123]

    2007 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Actis and G

    S. Actis and G. Passarino,Two-Loop Renormalization in the Standard Model Part III: Renormalization Equations and their Solutions,Nucl. Phys. B777(2007) 100–156, [hep-ph/0612124]

    2007 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Denner and S

    A. Denner and S. Dittmaier,Electroweak Radiative Corrections for Collider Physics,Phys. Rept.864(2020) 1–163, [1912.06823]

    2020

  33. [42]

    Dittmaier,Electric charge renormalization to all orders,Phys

    S. Dittmaier,Electric charge renormalization to all orders,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 053006, [2101.05154]. – 31 –

    2021

  34. [43]

    Armadillo, S

    T. Armadillo, S. Devoto, M. Dradi and A. Vicini,Towards the two-loop electroweak corrections to the Drell-Yan process: the infrared structure,2511.20365

  35. [44]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman,Regularization and Renormalization of Gauge Fields, Nucl. Phys. B44(1972) 189–213

    1972

  36. [45]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison,Dimensionally Renormalized Green’s Functions for Theories with Massless Particles. 1.,Commun. Math. Phys.52(1977) 39

    1977

  37. [46]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison,Dimensionally Renormalized Green’s Functions for Theories with Massless Particles. 2.,Commun. Math. Phys.52(1977) 55

    1977

  38. [47]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison,Dimensional Renormalization and the Action Principle, Commun. Math. Phys.52(1977) 11–38

    1977

  39. [48]

    Kreimer,Theγ(5) Problem and Anomalies: A Clifford Algebra Approach,Phys

    D. Kreimer,Theγ(5) Problem and Anomalies: A Clifford Algebra Approach,Phys. Lett. B 237(1990) 59–62

    1990

  40. [49]

    J. G. Korner, D. Kreimer and K. Schilcher,A Practicable gamma(5) scheme in dimensional regularization,Z. Phys. C54(1992) 503–512

    1992

  41. [50]

    Kreimer,The Role of gamma(5) in dimensional regularization,hep-ph/9401354

    D. Kreimer,The Role of gamma(5) in dimensional regularization,hep-ph/9401354

    arXiv

  42. [51]

    Heller, A

    M. Heller, A. von Manteuffel, R. M. Schabinger and H. Spiesberger,Mixed EW-QCD two-loop amplitudes forq¯q→ℓ +ℓ− andγ 5 scheme independence of multi-loop corrections, JHEP05(2021) 213, [2012.05918]

    2021

  43. [52]

    Armadillo, R

    T. Armadillo, R. Bonciani, S. Devoto, N. Rana and A. Vicini,Evaluation of Feynman integrals with arbitrary complex masses via series expansions,Comput. Phys. Commun.282 (2023) 108545, [2205.03345]

    2023

  44. [53]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,AMFlow: A Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation via auxiliary mass flow,Comput. Phys. Commun.283(2023) 108565, [2201.11669]

    2023

  45. [54]

    Armadillo, S

    T. Armadillo, S. Devoto, M. Dradi and A. Vicini,Abiss: a tool for squared matrix element calculations in dimensional regularisation,in preparation(2026)

    2026

  46. [55]

    Freitas, W

    A. Freitas, W. Hollik, W. Walter and G. Weiglein,Electroweak two loop corrections to the MW −M Z mass correlation in the standard model,Nucl. Phys. B632(2002) 189–218, [hep-ph/0202131]

    2002 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Awramik and M

    M. Awramik and M. Czakon,Complete two loop electroweak contributions to the muon lifetime in the standard model,Phys. Lett. B568(2003) 48–54, [hep-ph/0305248]

    2003 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Y. Du, A. Freitas, H. H. Patel and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf,Parity-Violating Møller Scattering at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order: Closed Fermion Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 131801, [1912.08220]

    2021

  49. [58]

    Freitas and E

    A. Freitas and E. J. Wallace,Fermionic Electroweak Two-Loop Corrections to Drell-Yan and Related Processes,2512.15700

    arXiv

  50. [59]

    Denner, G

    A. Denner, G. Weiglein and S. Dittmaier,Application of the background field method to the electroweak standard model,Nucl. Phys. B440(1995) 95–128, [hep-ph/9410338]

    1995 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Actis, A

    S. Actis, A. Ferroglia, M. Passera and G. Passarino,Two-Loop Renormalization in the Standard Model. Part I: Prolegomena,Nucl. Phys. B777(2007) 1–34, [hep-ph/0612122]

    2007 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Denner, S

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Roth and L. H. Wieders,Electroweak corrections to charged-current e+ e- —>4 fermion processes: Technical details and further results,Nucl. Phys. B724(2005) 247–294, [hep-ph/0505042]. – 32 –

    2005 arXiv

  53. [62]

    Hahn,Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3,Comput

    T. Hahn,Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3,Comput. Phys. Commun.140(2001) 418–431, [hep-ph/0012260]

    2001 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Denner and J.-N

    A. Denner and J.-N. Lang,The Complex-Mass Scheme and Unitarity in perturbative Quantum Field Theory,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 377, [1406.6280]

    2015 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Frederix, S

    R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, D. Pagani, H. S. Shao and M. Zaro,The automation of next-to-leading order electroweak calculations,JHEP07(2018) 185, [1804.10017]

    2018

  56. [65]

    Weiglein, R

    G. Weiglein, R. Scharf and M. Bohm,Reduction of general two loop selfenergies to standard scalar integrals,Nucl. Phys. B416(1994) 606–644, [hep-ph/9310358]

    1994 arXiv

  57. [66]

    Denner, G

    A. Denner, G. Weiglein and S. Dittmaier,Gauge invariance of Green functions: Background field method versus pinch technique,Phys. Lett. B333(1994) 420–426, [hep-ph/9406204]

    1994 arXiv

  58. [67]

    Denner and S

    A. Denner and S. Dittmaier,Dyson summation without violating Ward identities and the Goldstone boson equivalence theorem,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 4499–4514, [hep-ph/9603341]

    1996 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Fleischer and F

    J. Fleischer and F. Jegerlehner,Radiative Corrections to Higgs Decays in the Extended Weinberg-Salam Model,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 2001–2026

    1981

  60. [69]

    Sirlin and R

    A. Sirlin and R. Zucchini,Dependence of the Quartic Coupling H(m) on M(H) and the Possible Onset of New Physics in the Higgs Sector of the Standard Model,Nucl. Phys. B266 (1986) 389–409

    1986

  61. [70]

    R. N. Lee,LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.523(2014) 012059, [1310.1145]

    2014 arXiv

  62. [71]

    A. I. Davydychev and J. B. Tausk,Two loop selfenergy diagrams with different masses and the momentum expansion,Nucl. Phys. B397(1993) 123–142

    1993

  63. [72]

    Passarino, C

    G. Passarino, C. Sturm and S. Uccirati,Higgs Pseudo-Observables, Second Riemann Sheet and All That,Nucl. Phys. B834(2010) 77–115, [1001.3360]

    2010 arXiv

  64. [73]

    Lange, J

    F. Lange, J. Usovitsch and Z. Wu,Kira 3: integral reduction with efficient seeding and optimized equation selection,2505.20197

  65. [74]

    Klappert, S

    J. Klappert, S. Y. Klein and F. Lange,Interpolation of dense and sparse rational functions and other improvements in FireFly,Comput. Phys. Commun.264(2021) 107968, [2004.01463]

    2021

  66. [75]

    Armadillo, R

    T. Armadillo, R. Bonciani, S. Devoto, N. Rana and A. Vicini,Two-loop mixed QCD-EW corrections to neutral current Drell-Yan,JHEP05(2022) 072, [2201.01754]

    2022

  67. [76]

    Buccioni, J.-N

    F. Buccioni, J.-N. Lang, J. M. Lindert, P. Maierh¨ ofer, S. Pozzorini, H. Zhang and M. F. Zoller,OpenLoops 2,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 866, [1907.13071]. – 33 –

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.