REVIEW 13 cited by
Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has made a transformative impact. However, the potential that LLMs such as ChatGPT can be exploited to generate misinformation has posed a serious concern to online safety and public trust. A fundamental research question is: will LLM-generated misinformation cause more harm than human-written misinformation? We propose to tackle this question from the perspective of detection difficulty. We first build a taxonomy of LLM-generated misinformation. Then we categorize and validate the potential real-world methods for generating misinformation with LLMs. Then, through extensive empirical investigation, we discover that LLM-generated misinformation can be harder to detect for humans and detectors compared to human-written misinformation with the same semantics, which suggests it can have more deceptive styles and potentially cause more harm. We also discuss the implications of our discovery on combating misinformation in the age of LLMs and the countermeasures.
Forward citations
Cited by 13 Pith papers
-
RLSpoofer: A Lightweight Evaluator for LLM Watermark Spoofing Resilience
RLSpoofer trains a 4B model on 100 watermarked paraphrase pairs to spoof PF watermarks at 62% success rate, far exceeding baselines trained on up to 10,000 samples.
-
Tailored untruths: How personalisation challenges LLM safeguards
A 1.6-million-text study of eight LLMs in four languages finds that adding demographic personae to disinformation prompts raises jailbreak rates from 78% to 82%.
-
RELIANCE: Curating and Evaluating Reproductive Health Information on Social Media
RELIANCE is a new expert-annotated dataset of TikTok reproductive health content paired with LLM fact-checking evaluations showing 60% accuracy in sampled videos and a 15% gap between claim and full-content assessment.
-
Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking
PAVE evaluates LLM verifiers across four pre-evidence epistemic states in RAG fact-checking, revealing model-dependent unreliable arbitration and proposing a JSD-based test-time method to improve reliability.
-
Do people rely on ChatGPT more than their peers to detect deepfake news?
In a lab deepfake-detection task, students shifted more toward ChatGPT's advice than toward peers' advice (weight-of-advice 0.59 vs 0.33), though in 2025 sessions they trusted linguistic experts slightly more than ChatGPT.
-
Consistency Analysis of Sentiment Predictions using Syntactic & Semantic Context Assessment Summarization (SSAS)
SSAS improves LLM sentiment prediction consistency and data quality by up to 30% on three review datasets via syntactic and semantic context assessment summarization.
-
Cross-Lingual Attention Distillation with Personality-Informed Generative Augmentation for Multilingual Personality Recognition
ADAM uses personality-guided LLM augmentation and cross-lingual attention distillation to raise balanced accuracy on multilingual personality recognition to 0.6332 on Essays and 0.7448 on Kaggle, outperforming standar...
-
ZoFia: Zero-Shot Fake News Detection with Entity-Guided Retrieval and Multi-LLM Interaction
ZoFia is a zero-shot fake news detection framework that uses hierarchical entity salience retrieval followed by multi-LLM adversarial debate to improve robustness over single-model approaches.
-
An Audit and Analysis of LLM-Assisted Health Misinformation Jailbreaks Against LLMs
LLM-generated jailbreak prompts elicited health misinformation from GPT-3.5, Llama 3.1-8B, and Gemini 2.0 Flash at high rates, and both LLM judges and simple classifiers detected the resulting texts with high accuracy.
-
Are Today's LLMs Ready to Explain Well-Being Concepts?
AI judges can score explanations of well-being concepts, and small models fine-tuned with preference data score better than larger models, although judges and explainers are all AIs.
-
Leveraging Weighted Syntactic and Semantic Context Assessment Summary (wSSAS) Towards Text Categorization Using LLMs
wSSAS is a two-phase deterministic framework that uses hierarchical text organization and SNR-based feature prioritization to improve clustering integrity, categorization accuracy, and reproducibility when applying LL...
-
Embodied AI: Emerging Risks and Opportunities for Policy Action
A policy analysis arguing that embodied AI risks are real, under-covered by current US/EU/UK frameworks, and best handled through certification, benchmarks, clarified liability, and economic adaptation.
-
AI-Generated Content in Cross-Domain Applications: Research Trends, Challenges and Propositions
A cross-domain vision paper that surveys AI-generated content and proposes research directions, without introducing new empirical results.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.