pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02086 · v1 · pith:BKFJFG7Dnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.HE· nucl-th

Λ hyperons in core-collapse supernovae: Equilibration and neutrino opacities

Ruben Zatini , Jorge Martin Camalich , Pasquale Dario Serpico , Tobias Fischer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 10:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.HEnucl-th
keywords Lambda hyperonscore-collapse supernovaeneutrino opacitieschemical equilibrationproto-neutron starsnonleptonic reactionsmuon neutrinosstrangeness production
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lambda hyperons reach chemical equilibrium in proto-neutron stars on timescales of 10^{-11} to 10^{-10} seconds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper calculates the rates at which Lambda hyperons are produced in the hot and dense conditions inside proto-neutron stars after core collapse. It finds that nonleptonic reactions drive chemical equilibration much faster than the star's overall evolution. The work uses an effective field theory approach to show that short-range interactions dominate these rates. It also identifies new channels where Lambda hyperons increase the absorption of low-energy muon neutrinos beyond what nucleons alone provide.

Core claim

Local chemical equilibration of Lambda hyperons is driven by nonleptonic strangeness-changing reactions, especially NN↔NΛ scattering, on timescales of order 10^{-11}-10^{-10} s. These timescales are many orders of magnitude shorter than macroscopic proto-neutron-star evolution timescales. Short-range contact interactions dominate the nonleptonic rates beyond a pure one-meson-exchange description. Semileptonic channels open additional absorption channels for low-energy muon neutrinos and antineutrinos such as ν_μ + Λ → μ^- + p, and at low energies these opacities exceed the nucleonic contributions.

What carries the argument

Nonleptonic strangeness-changing reactions NN↔NΛ that set the chemical equilibration timescale for Λ hyperons.

If this is right

  • Local chemical equilibrium for Λ hyperons can be assumed in dense-matter equation-of-state models for core-collapse supernovae.
  • Semileptonic reactions provide new absorption channels for muon neutrinos that may exceed nucleonic opacities at low energies.
  • These processes can influence the evolution of the muon lepton number during proto-neutron-star deleptonization.
  • Effective-field-theory calculations constrained by hypernuclear data are needed to capture the dominant short-range contributions to the rates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The results imply that time-dependent nonequilibrium effects for Λ hyperons can be neglected in supernova simulations.
  • Similar equilibration timescales may apply to other hyperons under comparable conditions.
  • Neutrino transport codes should incorporate these Λ-induced opacities to accurately model flavor evolution.
  • Ab initio nuclear calculations at finite temperature could test the dominance of contact interactions in these rates.

Load-bearing premise

The effective-field-theory framework constrained by hypernuclear weak-decay data accurately describes the short-range contact interactions that dominate the nonleptonic rates under the hot, dense, isospin-asymmetric conditions of post-collapse proto-neutron stars.

What would settle it

An observation or calculation showing that the NN to NΛ reaction rate under proto-neutron-star conditions leads to equilibration timescales exceeding 10^{-9} seconds would falsify the central claim of rapid local equilibration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02086 by Jorge Martin Camalich, Pasquale Dario Serpico, Ruben Zatini, Tobias Fischer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. One–pion–exchange contributions to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. One–kaon–exchange contributions with the same conventions as in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Contact-term contributions to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Anti)neutrino opacities induced by Λ-hyperons using the PNS in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Strange hadrons are commonly included in dense-matter equation-of-state models by imposing chemical equilibrium, but the weak-interaction timescales required to establish it in core-collapse supernovae have not been systematically assessed. In this paper we compute the $\Lambda$-hyperon production rates in the hot, dense, and isospin-asymmetric conditions characteristic of post-collapse proto-neutron stars. We find that local $\Lambda$ chemical equilibration is driven by nonleptonic strangeness-changing reactions, especially $NN\leftrightarrow N\Lambda$ scattering, on timescales of order $10^{-11}$-$10^{-10}$ s, many orders of magnitude shorter than macroscopic proto-neutron-star evolution timescales. Using an effective-field-theory framework constrained by hypernuclear weak-decay data, we find that short-range contact interactions dominate the nonleptonic rates, beyond a pure one-meson-exchange description. Semileptonic channels are too slow to set the equilibrium $\Lambda$ abundance, but they open additional absorption channels for low-energy muon neutrinos and antineutrinos, such as $\nu_\mu+\Lambda\to\mu^-+p$ and $p+\mu^-+\bar\nu_\mu\to\Lambda$. At low energies, these $\Lambda$-induced neutrino opacities exceed the corresponding nucleonic contributions for muon (anti)neutrinos, possibly influencing the evolution of the muon lepton number during proto-neutron-star deleptonization. These results support local chemical equilibrium for $\Lambda$ hyperons under the conditions studied and provide new weak-interaction input for flavor-dependent neutrino transport, muonization, and proto-neutron-star evolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes Λ-hyperon production rates in the hot, dense, isospin-asymmetric conditions of post-collapse proto-neutron stars using an effective-field-theory framework whose parameters are fixed by hypernuclear weak-decay data. It concludes that nonleptonic strangeness-changing reactions, especially NN↔NΛ scattering, drive local chemical equilibration on timescales of 10^{-11}–10^{-10} s—many orders of magnitude shorter than macroscopic PNS evolution—while semileptonic channels, though too slow to set equilibrium abundances, open additional absorption channels that make Λ-induced opacities for low-energy muon neutrinos and antineutrinos exceed the corresponding nucleonic contributions.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies concrete weak-interaction rates needed for supernova simulations that include hyperons in the equation of state and for flavor-dependent neutrino transport during deleptonization. The constraint of the EFT by independent hypernuclear data is a clear methodological strength, as is the explicit separation of nonleptonic versus semileptonic channels and the focus on muon-neutrino opacities.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3 (EFT framework and nonleptonic rates)] §3 (EFT framework and nonleptonic rates): the contact couplings are determined exclusively from hypernuclear weak-decay data at ρ ≲ ρ0 and T=0; the manuscript provides no quantitative assessment or sensitivity study of how these short-range terms behave at the PNS densities (up to 3–5ρ0), temperatures (10–50 MeV), and large isospin asymmetries relevant to the claimed 10^{-11}–10^{-10} s equilibration timescales.
  2. [Results on equilibration timescales (near Eq. for NN↔NΛ rate)] Results on equilibration timescales (near Eq. for NN↔NΛ rate): the reported timescales are presented without error bands, variation under changes to the EFT cutoff, or comparison to a nucleonic baseline, so the claim that these processes are “many orders of magnitude shorter” than macroscopic evolution cannot be verified from the available validation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure captions] Figure captions should explicitly state the density, temperature, and isospin-asymmetry ranges plotted so that the opacity comparisons can be directly compared to the PNS conditions discussed in the text.
  2. [Notation] The notation for the isospin asymmetry parameter δ and the definition of the effective chemical potentials should be collected in one place with an explicit equation reference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 (EFT framework and nonleptonic rates)] §3 (EFT framework and nonleptonic rates): the contact couplings are determined exclusively from hypernuclear weak-decay data at ρ ≲ ρ0 and T=0; the manuscript provides no quantitative assessment or sensitivity study of how these short-range terms behave at the PNS densities (up to 3–5ρ0), temperatures (10–50 MeV), and large isospin asymmetries relevant to the claimed 10^{-11}–10^{-10} s equilibration timescales.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the contact couplings in our EFT are fixed using hypernuclear weak-decay data at densities ρ ≲ ρ0 and T=0. The manuscript does not include a dedicated quantitative sensitivity study for the higher densities, temperatures, and isospin asymmetries in proto-neutron stars. We agree that such an analysis would strengthen the robustness of our results. In the revised manuscript, we will add a discussion of the cutoff dependence of the rates and an estimate of the theoretical uncertainties associated with the extrapolation to PNS conditions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on equilibration timescales (near Eq. for NN↔NΛ rate)] Results on equilibration timescales (near Eq. for NN↔NΛ rate): the reported timescales are presented without error bands, variation under changes to the EFT cutoff, or comparison to a nucleonic baseline, so the claim that these processes are “many orders of magnitude shorter” than macroscopic evolution cannot be verified from the available validation.

    Authors: The equilibration timescales in the manuscript are indeed presented as central values without accompanying error bands or explicit variations with the EFT cutoff. We also note that a direct comparison to a nucleonic baseline is not provided. To address these points, we will include in the revised version error estimates derived from variations in the EFT cutoff scale, as well as a comparison of the nonleptonic rates to the corresponding nucleonic processes to better contextualize the 'many orders of magnitude' claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; rates derived from externally constrained EFT

full rationale

The paper derives Λ equilibration timescales and neutrino opacities from nonleptonic rates computed in an EFT whose short-range contact interactions are fixed by independent hypernuclear weak-decay data. These inputs are external experimental constraints, not fitted to the PNS conditions or target timescales themselves. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains appear in the derivation; the central claims remain independent of the quantities being reported.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on an effective-field-theory description whose low-energy constants are taken from hypernuclear data; no free parameters are introduced inside the paper itself and no new particles or forces are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Effective-field-theory framework constrained by hypernuclear weak-decay data accurately captures short-range contact interactions dominating nonleptonic rates
    Invoked to justify the rate calculations beyond one-meson exchange.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5846 in / 1353 out tokens · 38989 ms · 2026-07-03T10:03:12.327909+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    One meson exchange The one-meson-exchange contributions arise from di- agrams in which a pion or kaon is exchanged between two baryon lines, with one weak vertex inducing the ∆S= 1 transition and one strong vertex, see Figs. 1 and 2. The relevant nonleptonic weak vertices, describ- ingBB ′ϕ-interactions, whereϕdenotes a pion or kaon, are written in the ch...

  2. [2]

    It is therefore useful to first write the corresponding operators in a nonrelativistic heavy-baryon language

    Contact interactions The contact interactions in the EFT are parametrized in terms of the non-relativistic Λ +N− →N+Npoten- tial. It is therefore useful to first write the corresponding operators in a nonrelativistic heavy-baryon language. For thep+n− →p+ Λ channel, after performing a Fierz re- arrangement (for details, see App. B 3), the LO contact opera...

  3. [3]

    UNDARK” of the Widening participation and spreading excellence pro- gramme (project number 101159929). RZ and JMC also acknowledge the MICINN through the grant “Dark- Maps

    Calculation of the nonleptonic scattering rates Our goal is to compute the scattering rates entering the collision operators for these two processes. To this end, we now introduce the approximations used in the rate calculation for these scattering channels. •We approximate the contribution of the Pauli blocking factors (1±f ω) in the integrand of Eq. (2)...

    2023

  4. [4]

    Partial widths and asymmetry parameters In theBrest frame, the final baryon momentum and energy are respectively |⃗ p|= λ1/2 K (M2, M ′2 , m2 ϕ) 2M , E= M ′2 +M 2 −m 2 ϕ 2M .(A2) Using Eq. (A1), the corresponding two-body decay width is Γ = G2 F m4 π+ 4πM |⃗ p|(E+M′) |AϕB′B|2 + E−M ′ E+M ′ |BϕB′B|2 ,(A3) which has to be matched with its experimental value...

  5. [5]

    (A4) andris obtained from Eq

    Extraction ofAandB Defining K= G2 F m4 π+ 4πM |⃗ p|(E+M′),(A9) the corresponding weak hadronic couplings for the decayB− →B ′ +ϕare then given by AϕB′B =± r Γ/K 1 +r 2 ,B ϕB′B = E+M ′ |⃗ p| rA ϕB′B,(A10) where Γ is taken from Eq. (A4) andris obtained from Eq. (A8) using the measured value ofα. Since the decay width and asymmetry parameter leave an overall...

  6. [6]

    Semileptonic processes For the semileptonic scattering channel ℓ− +B− →ν ℓ +B ′ (B1) whereBandB ′ denote octet baryons connected by a strangeness-changing ∆S=−1 weak charged current. With the approximation at leading order in SU(3)-flavor breaking andq 2/M2 explained in the main text, the spin-averaged squared matrix element reads |M|2 ℓ−B→νℓB′ = 8G 2 F |...

  7. [7]

    As discussed in the main text, both OPE and OKE amplitudes are built from one strong and one weak baryon–baryon–meson vertex

    Nonleptonic processes Let us now consider the one-meson-exchange (OME) contributions. As discussed in the main text, both OPE and OKE amplitudes are built from one strong and one weak baryon–baryon–meson vertex. For the nonleptonic scattering channelsn+n− →n+ Λ andp+n− →p+ Λ, each exchanged meson gives rise to two topologies (see Figs. 1 and 2). Thus, eac...

  8. [8]

    Contact terms We start with the nonrelativistic Λ +N− →N+Npotential at LO presented in [49, 50], V LO =G F C0 0 +C 1 0 ⃗ σ1 ·⃗ σ2 (CIS +C IV (⃗ τ1 h)·⃗ τ2), h= 0 1 ,(B18) where we have labeled the line in which Λ← →Noccurs as 1 (withhan isospin spurion), and as 2 thespectator line. This can be matched to a nonrelativistic Hamiltonian, Hct =G F Iab;d h C0 ...

  9. [9]

    H. A. Bethe and J. R. Wilson, Astrophys. J.295, 14 (1985)

    1985

  10. [10]

    G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Astronomiceskij Zhurnal47, 813 (1970)

    1970

  11. [11]

    J. M. LeBlanc and J. R. Wilson, ApJ161, 541 (1970)

    1970

  12. [12]

    Takahara and K

    M. Takahara and K. Sato, Progress of Theoretical Physics80, 861 (1988)

    1988

  13. [13]

    Signals of the QCD phase transition in core-collapse supernovae

    I. Sagert, T. Fischer, M. Hempel, G. Pagliara, J. Schaffner-Bielich, A. Mezzacappa, F. K. Thielemann, and M. Liebend¨ orfer, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 081101 (2009), arXiv:0809.4225 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  14. [14]

    Quark deconfinement as supernova explosion engine for massive blue-supergiant stars

    T. Fischer, N.-U. F. Bastian, M.-R. Wu, P. Bak- lanov, E. Sorokina, S. Blinnikov, S. Typel, T. Kl¨ ahn, and D. B. Blaschke, Nature Astronomy2, 980 (2018), arXiv:1712.08788 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Theory of Core-Collapse Supernovae

    H.-T. Janka, K. Langanke, A. Marek, G. Martinez- Pinedo, and B. Mueller, Phys. Rept.442, 38 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0612072

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  16. [16]

    Supernova Neutrinos: Production, Oscillations and Detection

    A. Mirizzi, I. Tamborra, H.-T. Janka, N. Sa- viano, K. Scholberg, R. Bollig, L. Hudepohl, and S. Chakraborty, Riv. Nuovo Cim.39, 1 (2016), arXiv:1508.00785 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    The Status of Multi-Dimensional Core-Collapse Supernova Models

    B. M¨ uller, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.33, e048 (2016), arXiv:1608.03274 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Janka, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Sci- ence75, 425 (2025), arXiv:2502.14836 [astro-ph.HE]

    H.-T. Janka, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Sci- ence75, 425 (2025), arXiv:2502.14836 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    An Exploration of the Equation of State Dependence of Core-Collapse Supernova Explosion Outcomes and Signatures

    A. Rusakov, A. S. Burrows, T. Wang, and D. Var- tanyan, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2602.09025 (2026), arXiv:2602.09025 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    The state of matter in simulations of core-collapse supernovae -- Reflections and recent developments

    T. Fischer, N.-U. Bastian, D. Blaschke, M. Cierniak, M. Hempel, T. Kl¨ ahn, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, W. G. New- ton, G. R¨ opke, and S. Typel, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 34, 67 (2017), arXiv:1711.07411 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars

    M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Kl¨ ahn, and S. Typel, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015007 (2017), arXiv:1610.03361 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    Hyperons in hot dense matter: what do the constraints tell us for equation of state?

    M. Fortin, M. Oertel, and C. Providˆ encia, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.35, 44 (2018), arXiv:1711.09427 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    J. M. Camalich, J. Terol-Calvo, L. Tolos, and R. Ziegler, Phys. Rev. D103, L121301 (2021), arXiv:2012.11632 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Kochankovski, A

    H. Kochankovski, A. Ramos, and L. Tolos, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.528, 2629 (2024), arXiv:2309.14879 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Fischer, J

    T. Fischer, J. Martin Camalich, H. Kochankovski, and L. Tolos, JCAP01, 061 (2025), arXiv:2408.01406 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Muon Creation in Supernova Matter Facilitates Neutrino-driven Explosions

    R. Bollig, H. T. Janka, A. Lohs, G. Martinez-Pinedo, C. J. Horowitz, and T. Melson, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 242702 (2017), arXiv:1706.04630 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    Bollig, W

    R. Bollig, W. DeRocco, P. W. Graham, and H.-T. Janka, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 051104 (2020), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 126, 189901 (2021)], arXiv:2005.07141 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    G. Guo, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, A. Lohs, and T. Fischer, Phys. Rev. D102, 023037 (2020), arXiv:2006.12051 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Fischer, G

    T. Fischer, G. Guo, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, M. Liebend¨ orfer, and A. Mezzacappa, Phys. Rev. D102, 123001 (2020), arXiv:2008.13628 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Capozzi, S

    F. Capozzi, S. Abbar, R. Bollig, and H. T. Janka, Phys. Rev. D103, 063013 (2021), arXiv:2012.08525 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Fischer, P

    T. Fischer, P. Carenza, B. Fore, M. Giannotti, A. Mi- rizzi, and S. Reddy, Phys. Rev. D104, 103012 (2021), arXiv:2108.13726 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    V. A. Ambartsumyan and G. S. Saakyan, Soviet Astron- omy4, 187 (1960)

    1960

  33. [33]

    A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary

    J. Antoniadis, P. C. C. Freire, N. Wex, T. M. Tauris, R. S. Lynch, M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Kramer, C. Bassa, V. S. Dhillon, T. Driebe, J. W. T. Hessels, V. M. Kaspi, V. I. Kondratiev, N. Langer, T. R. Marsh, M. A. McLaugh- lin, T. T. Pennucci, S. M. Ransom, I. H. Stairs, J. van Leeuwen, J. P. W. Verbiest, and D. G. Whelan, Science 340, 448 (2013), arXiv:13...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  34. [34]

    H. T. Cromartie, E. Fonseca, S. M. Ransom, P. B. De- morest, Z. Arzoumanian, H. Blumer, P. R. Brook, M. E. DeCesar, T. Dolch, J. A. Ellis, R. D. Ferdman, E. C. Ferrara, N. Garver-Daniels, P. A. Gentile, M. L. Jones, M. T. Lam, D. R. Lorimer, R. S. Lynch, M. A. McLaugh- lin, C. Ng, D. J. Nice, T. T. Pennucci, R. Spiewak, I. H. Stairs, K. Stovall, J. K. Swi...

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bog- danov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, R. M. Lud- lam, S. Mahmoodifar, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, T. E. Strohmayer, K. S. Wood, T. Enoto, R. Foster, T. Oka- jima, G. Prigozhin, and Y. Soong, ApJ887, L24 (2019), arXiv:1912.05705 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    A. V. Bilous, A. L. Watts, A. K. Harding, T. E. Riley, Z. Arzoumanian, S. Bogdanov, K. C. Gendreau, P. S. Ray, S. Guillot, W. C. G. Ho, and D. Chakrabarty, ApJ 887, L23 (2019), arXiv:1912.05704 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, P. S. Ray, S. Bogdanov, S. Guillot, S. M. Morsink, A. V. Bilous, Z. Arzouma- nian, D. Choudhury, J. S. Deneva, K. C. Gendreau, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, M. Loewen- stein, R. M. Ludlam, C. B. Markwardt, T. Okajima, C. Prescod-Weinstein, R. A. Remillard, M. T. Wolff, E. Fonseca, H. T. Cromartie, M. Kerr, T. T. Pen...

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, M. Loewenstein, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, M. T. Wolff, C. L. Baker, T. Cazeau, S. Man- thripragada, C. B. Markwardt, T. Okajima, S. Pollard, I. Cognard, H. T. Cromartie, E. Fonseca, L. Guillemot, M. Kerr, A. Parthasarathy, T. T. ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    N. K. Glendenning, Physics Letters B114, 392 (1982)

    1982

  40. [40]

    N. K. Glendenning, The Astrophysical Journal293, 470 (1985)

    1985

  41. [41]

    Hyperons: the strange ingredients of the nuclear equation of state

    I. Vida˜ na, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A474, 0145 (2018), arXiv:1803.00504 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Tolos and L

    L. Tolos and L. Fabbietti, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.112, 103770 (2020), arXiv:2002.09223 [nucl-ex]. 20

    work page arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    M. G. Alford and A. Haber, Phys. Rev. C103, 045810 (2021), arXiv:2009.05181 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Martin Camalich and R

    J. Martin Camalich and R. Ziegler, (2025), 10.1146/annurev-nucl-121423-100931, arXiv:2503.17323 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-121423-100931 2025

  45. [45]

    Cavan-Piton, D

    M. Cavan-Piton, D. Guadagnoli, M. Oertel, H. Seong, and L. Vittorio, (2024), arXiv:2401.10979 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Neutrino spectra evolution during proto-neutron star deleptonization

    T. Fischer, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, M. Hempel, and M. Liebend¨ orfer, Phys. Rev. D85, 083003 (2012), arXiv:1112.3842 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  47. [47]

    J. M. Lattimer and F. Swesty, Nuclear Physics A535, 331 (1991)

    1991

  48. [48]

    H. Shen, H. Toki, K. Oyamatsu, and K. Sumiyoshi, Nu- clear Physics A637, 435 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9805035

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  49. [49]

    G. Shen, C. J. Horowitz, and E. O’Connor, Phys. Rev. C 83, 065808 (2011), arXiv:1103.5174 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  50. [50]

    Statistical Model for a Complete Supernova Equation of State

    M. Hempel and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Nuclear Physics A 837, 210 (2010), arXiv:0911.4073 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  51. [51]

    A. W. Steiner, M. Hempel, and T. Fischer, ApJ774, 17 (2013), arXiv:1207.2184 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    Simultaneous chiral symmetry restoration and deconfinement - Consequences for the QCD phase diagram

    T. Kl¨ ahn, T. Fischer, and M. Hempel, ApJ836, 89 (2017), arXiv:1603.03679 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    N.-U. F. Bastian, Phys. Rev. D103, 023001 (2021), arXiv:2009.10846 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    R. F. Sawyer, Phys. Rev. Lett.29, 382 (1972)

    1972

  55. [55]

    Baym, Phys

    G. Baym, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1340 (1973)

    1973

  56. [56]

    Fore and S

    B. Fore and S. Reddy, Phys. Rev. C101, 035809 (2020), arXiv:1911.02632 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    $\Lambda N \to NN$ weak interaction in effective field theory

    A. Parreno, C. Bennhold, and B. R. Holstein, Phys. Rev. C70, 051601 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0308074

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  58. [58]

    An EFT for the weak $\Lambda N$ interaction

    A. Parreno, C. Bennhold, and B. R. Holstein, Nucl. Phys. A754, 127 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0312047

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  59. [59]

    One-loop contributions in the EFT for the $\Lambda N \to NN$ transition

    A. P´ erez-Obiol, D. R. Entem, B. Juli´ a-D´ ıaz, and A. Parre˜ no, Phys. Rev. C87, 044614 (2013), arXiv:1302.6955 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  60. [60]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  61. [61]

    Pich, Rept

    A. Pich, Rept. Prog. Phys.58, 563 (1995), arXiv:hep- ph/9502366

    work page arXiv 1995

  62. [62]

    Semileptonic Hyperon Decays

    N. Cabibbo, E. C. Swallow, and R. Winston, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.53, 39 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0307298

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  63. [63]

    Scherer and M

    S. Scherer and M. R. Schindler,A Primer for Chiral Per- turbation Theory, Vol. 830 (2012)

    2012

  64. [64]

    Burrows and J

    A. Burrows and J. M. Lattimer, ApJ307, 178 (1986)

    1986

  65. [65]

    Nagakura, A

    H. Nagakura, A. Burrows, D. Radice, and D. Vartanyan, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society492, 5764 (2020), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/492/4/5764/32432608/staa261.pdf

    2020

  66. [66]

    The Interplay Between Protoneutron Star Convection and Neutrino Transport in Core Collapse Supernovae

    A. Mezzacappa, A. C. Calder, S. W. Bruenn, J. M. Blondin, M. W. Guidry, M. R. Strayer, and A. S. Umar, ApJ493, 848 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9709184 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  67. [67]

    Multi-Dimensional Radiation/Hydrodynamic Simulations of Protoneutron Star Convection

    L. Dessart, A. Burrows, E. Livne, and C. D. Ott, ApJ 645, 534 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0510229 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  68. [68]

    Fischer, G

    T. Fischer, G. Guo, K. Langanke, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, Y.-Z. Qian, and M.-R. Wu, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics137, 104107 (2024), arXiv:2308.03962 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev.112, 1375 (1958)

    1958

  70. [70]

    Ademollo and R

    M. Ademollo and R. Gatto, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 264 (1964)

    1964

  71. [71]

    C. J. Horowitz, G. Shen, E. O’Connor, and C. D. Ott, Phys. Rev. C86, 065806 (2012), arXiv:1209.3173 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  72. [72]

    L. F. Roberts and S. Reddy, Phys. Rev. C95, 045807 (2017), arXiv:1612.02764 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  73. [73]

    Charged-current neutrino opacity within the relativistic Hartree-Fock framework for astrophysical simulations of core-collapse supernovae and binary neutron star mergers

    K. Soko lowski, A. Kumar, and T. Fischer, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2605.17563 (2026), arXiv:2605.17563 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  74. [74]

    Effects of Strong and Electromagnetic Correlations on Neutrino Interactions in Dense Matter

    S. Reddy, M. Prakash, J. M. Lattimer, and J. A. Pons, Phys. Rev. C59, 2888 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9811294 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  75. [75]

    B. Fore, N. Kaiser, S. Reddy, and N. C. Warring- ton, Phys. Rev. C110, 025803 (2024), arXiv:2301.07226 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    E. N. E. van Dalen and A. E. L. Dieperink, Phys. Rev. C69, 025802 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0311103

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  77. [77]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Computer Physics Communications306, 109357 (2025)

    2025

  78. [78]

    Mertig, M

    R. Mertig, M. B¨ ohm, and A. Denner, Computer Physics Communications64, 345 (1991)

    1991

  79. [79]

    T. D. Lee and C.-N. Yang, Phys. Rev.108, 1645 (1957)

    1957

  80. [80]

    E. E. Jenkins, Nucl. Phys. B375, 561 (1992)

    1992

Showing first 80 references.