pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31749 · v1 · pith:BLP32JZMnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Finite-Density Dynamics of Chemically Equilibrating QGP in Conformal Gubser Flow and Hard Thermal Photon Production

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 04:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords quark-gluon plasmachemical equilibrationfinite baryon densityGubser flowthermal photonsheavy-ion collisionsnon-equilibrium dynamicsfugacity parameters
0
0 comments X

The pith

Finite baryon density and transverse flow delay chemical equilibration in the quark-gluon plasma, suppressing total thermal photon yield while enhancing early high-p_T contributions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates chemical equilibration in a hot dense quark-gluon plasma at finite baryon density during relativistic heavy-ion collisions modeled with conformal Gubser flow. It tracks the approach to equilibrium using fugacity parameters in parton distributions whose evolution follows master rate equations tied to the hydrodynamic expansion. Both finite density and the transverse flow slow this equilibration, leaving the medium undersaturated with quarks trailing gluons. The resulting non-equilibrium state reduces the overall thermal photon output from the system yet increases the early-time production of high-momentum photons. The instantaneous emission rates develop a characteristic time dependence shaped by the competition between rapid cooling and changing fugacities.

Core claim

In conformal Gubser flow at finite baryon density, chemical non-equilibrium is incorporated through fugacity parameters whose evolution is governed by master rate equations coupled to the hydrodynamic expansion; both finite density and transverse expansion delay chemical equilibration and produce a chemically undersaturated medium in which quarks lag behind gluons; the overall thermal photon yield is suppressed while an enhanced early-time contribution appears at high transverse momentum, and the instantaneous rates display a distinct temporal structure arising from the interplay of rapid cooling and evolving fugacities.

What carries the argument

Fugacity parameters in the parton phase-space distribution functions, evolved through master rate equations coupled to conformal Gubser hydrodynamic expansion.

If this is right

  • The medium remains chemically undersaturated with quarks lagging behind gluons throughout the evolution.
  • The total thermal photon yield integrated over the expanding system is reduced relative to equilibrium expectations.
  • High-p_T photon production receives an enhanced contribution from the early-time non-equilibrium stage.
  • Instantaneous photon emission rates develop a distinct temporal profile set by the competition between cooling and fugacity changes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Photon spectra measured at different collision energies could encode information on the timing of chemical equilibration.
  • The same non-equilibrium framework may affect other early-time observables such as dilepton production.
  • Hydrodynamic models that assume instant chemical equilibrium may need adjustment when applied to finite-density regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The master rate equations coupled to the conformal Gubser hydrodynamic expansion, together with the fugacity parameterization of the parton distributions, sufficiently capture the chemical evolution at finite baryon density without requiring additional viscous corrections or non-conformal effects.

What would settle it

A measurement of thermal photon yields in heavy-ion collisions at finite baryon density that shows no overall suppression and no early-time enhancement at high p_T would falsify the predicted effects of delayed chemical equilibration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31749 by Lakshmi J. Naik, V. Sreekanth.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Hard thermal photon production rates from chemically [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolution of the entropy density as a function of Gubser [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Flow trajectories of chemically equilibrating ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Variation of freeze-out proper time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Evolution of temperature, quark and gluon fugacities, and quark chemical potential of chemically equilibrating QGP at finite density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Quark and gluon equilibration rates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Evolution of temperature, chemical potential and parton [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Total thermal photon spectra from chemically equilibrating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Cumulative early-time fraction of the hard thermal photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Cumulative early-time fraction of the hard thermal photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Instantaneous photon rates from a chemically equilibrating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the chemical equilibration of a hot and dense quark-gluon plasma (QGP) at finite baryon density produced in relativistic heavy-ion collisions within conformal Gubser flow. Chemical non-equilibrium is incorporated through fugacity parameters in the parton phase-space distribution functions, whose evolution is governed by master rate equations coupled to the hydrodynamic expansion with transverse flow. We analyse the interplay between chemical equilibration and finite-density dynamics, and investigate its impact on hard thermal photon production. We observe that both finite density and transverse expansion delay chemical equilibration, leading to a chemically undersaturated medium with quarks lagging behind gluons. While the overall thermal photon yield from the expanding system is suppressed in the non-equilibrium scenario, we find an enhanced early-time contribution to high $p_T$ photon production. By analyzing the instantaneous photon emission in presence of chemical non-equilibrium, we demonstrate that the rates exhibit a distinct temporal structure arising from the interplay of rapid cooling and evolving fugacities. These features may provide potential observable signatures of chemical equilibration dynamics in the QGP.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies chemical equilibration of a hot and dense QGP at finite baryon density in conformal Gubser flow. Non-equilibrium effects are incorporated via fugacity parameters in parton distributions whose evolution is governed by master rate equations coupled to the hydrodynamic expansion. The work analyzes the interplay of finite density, transverse flow, and chemical equilibration, and its consequences for hard thermal photon production. Key findings are that finite density and expansion delay equilibration, producing an undersaturated medium with quarks lagging gluons; overall photon yield is suppressed but early-time high-p_T emission is enhanced; and instantaneous rates show distinct temporal structure from the competition between rapid cooling and evolving fugacities.

Significance. If the modeling holds, the results provide a controlled analytic framework for non-equilibrium dynamics at finite density, identifying potential photon observables that could signal chemical equilibration timescales in heavy-ion collisions. The use of conformal Gubser flow combined with rate equations allows clean isolation of expansion versus density effects on fugacity evolution, and the reported temporal structure in emission rates offers a falsifiable prediction for photon spectra.

major comments (1)
  1. [modeling setup and rate equations] The central claims on delayed equilibration, quark-gluon lag, and the resulting photon yield modifications rest on the fugacity parameterization and master rate equations coupled to conformal Gubser hydro. At finite baryon density the collision integrals must incorporate mu_B dependence and, typically, separate fugacities for quarks and antiquarks; the manuscript does not demonstrate that these are included, nor does it address possible baryon diffusion or small non-conformal corrections to the EOS that would modify the cooling trajectory. A concrete test is whether the reported undersaturation and early-time photon enhancement survive when distinct lambda_q and lambda_barq are evolved with mu_B-dependent rates.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'quarks lagging behind gluons' but does not specify whether a single quark fugacity or separate quark/antiquark fugacities are employed; this notation should be clarified in the text and figures.
  2. [figures] Figure captions for the time-dependent photon rates should explicitly label the equilibrium versus non-equilibrium curves and the chosen initial fugacity and mu_B values to allow direct comparison with the rate-equation solutions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments raise important points regarding the modeling of finite-density effects, which we address below. We believe these clarifications will strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [modeling setup and rate equations] The central claims on delayed equilibration, quark-gluon lag, and the resulting photon yield modifications rest on the fugacity parameterization and master rate equations coupled to conformal Gubser hydro. At finite baryon density the collision integrals must incorporate mu_B dependence and, typically, separate fugacities for quarks and antiquarks; the manuscript does not demonstrate that these are included, nor does it address possible baryon diffusion or small non-conformal corrections to the EOS that would modify the cooling trajectory. A concrete test is whether the reported undersaturation and early-time photon enhancement survive when distinct lambda_q and lambda_barq are evolved with mu_B-dependent rates.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting these aspects of our modeling setup. Our approach incorporates finite baryon density through the chemical potential μ_B appearing in the parton distribution functions and in the collision integrals of the master rate equations. The fugacity parameters are evolved self-consistently with the Gubser hydrodynamic flow. However, we employ a single fugacity for the quark sector (λ_q = λ_{\bar q}) rather than evolving them separately. This choice is made to focus on the essential physics of chemical non-equilibrium in the conformal limit while keeping the system analytically tractable. We agree that a more complete treatment with distinct λ_q and λ_{\bar q} and explicit μ_B dependence in the rates would be desirable for quantitative precision at high densities. We will revise the manuscript to clearly state this approximation in the methods section and add a discussion of its validity and potential effects on the results. Regarding baryon diffusion and non-conformal corrections to the equation of state, these are neglected within the assumptions of conformal Gubser flow; we will include a brief remark on these limitations in the revised version. We expect the qualitative features, including the delayed equilibration and the temporal structure in photon emission, to persist under these extensions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results follow from solving coupled rate equations and hydrodynamics

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by writing master rate equations for the time evolution of fugacities (governed by collision integrals and the conformal Gubser expansion), integrating them numerically along the hydrodynamic trajectory, and then computing photon emission rates from the resulting non-equilibrium distributions. These steps are differential and depend on stated initial conditions, rate coefficients, and the flow profile; none reduce by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, a self-definitional closure, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The reported delays, undersaturation, and photon temporal structure are outputs of the integration, not inputs, so the chain is self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the conformal Gubser solution for the expansion, the form of the master rate equations for fugacity evolution, and the assumption that fugacity parameters adequately encode chemical non-equilibrium at finite density. No new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • initial fugacity values
    Initial values for quark and gluon fugacities are required to start the rate equations and are not derived from first principles.
  • baryon chemical potential or density parameter
    Finite baryon density enters the distributions and rate equations and must be specified as an input.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Conformal Gubser flow provides an accurate description of the hydrodynamic expansion including transverse flow
    The entire evolution is performed inside this analytic flow solution.
  • domain assumption Master rate equations with fugacity parameters capture the dominant chemical processes
    The evolution of chemical non-equilibrium is governed solely by these equations coupled to the flow.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5722 in / 1565 out tokens · 51599 ms · 2026-07-01T04:33:12.404603+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages · 66 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    WithT 0 = 0.57GeV ,λ 0 g = 0.08,λ 0 q = 0.02 atτ 0 = 0.7fm, the cumulative early time fraction is calcu- lated and displayed in Fig

    as well. WithT 0 = 0.57GeV ,λ 0 g = 0.08,λ 0 q = 0.02 atτ 0 = 0.7fm, the cumulative early time fraction is calcu- lated and displayed in Fig. 18. One can see that,Y ∗ at large pT remains distinctly high for non-equilibrium case for all the τ∗ values, as seen before. This exceptionally large early time fraction of the highp T photons, we believe, is the ch...

  2. [2]

    Perfect Fluidity of the Quark Gluon Plasma Core as Seen through its Dissipative Hadronic Corona

    T. Hirano and M. Gyulassy, Perfect fluidity of the quark gluon plasma core as seen through its dissipative hadronic corona, Nucl. Phys. A769, 71 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0506049

  3. [3]

    S. A. V oloshin, A. M. Poskanzer, and R. Snellings, Collec- tive phenomena in non-central nuclear collisions, Landolt- Bornstein23, 293 (2010), arXiv:0809.2949 [nucl-ex]

  4. [4]

    Challenges in QCD matter physics - The Compressed Baryonic Matter experiment at FAIR

    T. Ablyazimovet al.(CBM), Challenges in QCD matter physics –The scientific programme of the Compressed Bary- onic Matter experiment at FAIR, Eur. Phys. J. A53, 60 (2017), arXiv:1607.01487 [nucl-ex]

  5. [5]

    Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR), Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program, Phys. Rev. C96, 044904 (2017), arXiv:1701.07065 [nucl-ex]

  6. [6]

    Senger, Heavy-Ion Collisions at FAIR-NICA Energies, Par- ticles4, 214 (2021)

    P. Senger, Heavy-Ion Collisions at FAIR-NICA Energies, Par- ticles4, 214 (2021)

  7. [7]

    Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium -- Ten Years of Progress in Theory and Numerical Simulations of Nuclear Collisions

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke,Relativistic Fluid Dy- namics In and Out of Equilibrium, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2019) arXiv:1712.05815 [nucl-th]

  8. [8]

    Flow at the SPS and RHIC as a Quark Gluon Plasma Signature

    D. Teaney, J. Lauret, and E. V . Shuryak, Flow at the SPS and RHIC as a quark gluon plasma signature, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 4783 (2001), arXiv:nucl-th/0011058

  9. [9]

    Causal Theories of Dissipative Relativistic Fluid Dynamics for Nuclear Collisions

    A. Muronga, Causal theories of dissipative relativistic fluid dynamics for nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C69, 034903 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0309055

  10. [10]

    Viscosity Information from Relativistic Nuclear Collisions: How Perfect is the Fluid Observed at RHIC?

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Viscosity Information from Relativistic Nuclear Collisions: How Perfect is the Fluid Observed at RHIC?, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 172301 (2007), arXiv:0706.1522 [nucl-th]

  11. [11]

    Causal viscous hydrodynamics in 2+1 dimensions for relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    H. Song and U. W. Heinz, Causal viscous hydrodynamics in 2+1 dimensions for relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C77, 064901 (2008), arXiv:0712.3715 [nucl-th]

  12. [12]

    C. Gale, S. Jeon, and B. Schenke, Hydrodynamic Modeling of Heavy-Ion Collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28, 1340011 (2013), arXiv:1301.5893 [nucl-th]

  13. [13]

    E. V . Shuryak, Two stage equilibration in high-energy heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 3270 (1992)

  14. [14]

    Geiger, Thermalization in ultrarelativistic nuclear colli- sions

    K. Geiger, Thermalization in ultrarelativistic nuclear colli- sions. 1. Parton kinetics and quark gluon plasma formation, Phys. Rev. D46, 4965 (1992)

  15. [15]

    T. S. Biro, E. van Doorn, B. Muller, M. H. Thoma, and X. N. Wang, Parton equilibration in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C48, 1275 (1993), arXiv:nucl-th/9303004

  16. [16]

    Open Charm Production in an Equilibrating Parton Plasma

    P. Levai, B. Muller, and X.-N. Wang, Open charm produc- tion in an equilibrating parton plasma, Phys. Rev. C51, 3326 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9412352

  17. [17]

    S. M. H. Wong, Thermal and chemical equilibration in rel- ativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C54, 2588 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9609287

  18. [18]

    Bottom-up thermalization in heavy ion collisions

    R. Baier, A. H. Mueller, D. Schiff, and D. T. Son, ’Bottom up’ thermalization in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B502, 51 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0009237

  19. [19]

    Turbulent thermalization process in heavy-ion collisions at ultrarelativistic energies

    J. Berges, K. Boguslavski, S. Schlichting, and R. Venu- gopalan, Turbulent thermalization process in heavy-ion col- lisions at ultrarelativistic energies, Phys. Rev. D89, 074011 (2014), arXiv:1303.5650 [hep-ph]. 19

  20. [20]

    Pressure isotropization in high energy heavy ion collisions

    T. Epelbaum and F. Gelis, Pressure isotropization in high en- ergy heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 232301 (2013), arXiv:1307.2214 [hep-ph]

  21. [21]

    Isotropization and hydrodynamization in weakly coupled heavy-ion collisions

    A. Kurkela and Y . Zhu, Isotropization and hydrodynamization in weakly coupled heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 182301 (2015), arXiv:1506.06647 [hep-ph]

  22. [22]

    Initial conditions for hydrodynamics from weakly coupled pre-equilibrium evolution

    L. Keegan, A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, and D. Teaney, Ini- tial conditions for hydrodynamics from weakly coupled pre- equilibrium evolution, JHEP08, 171, arXiv:1605.04287 [hep- ph]

  23. [23]

    Effective kinetic description of event-by-event pre-equilibrium dynamics in high-energy heavy-ion collisions

    A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, S. Schlichting, and D. Teaney, Effective kinetic description of event-by-event pre-equilibrium dynamics in high-energy heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C99, 034910 (2019), arXiv:1805.00961 [hep-ph]

  24. [24]

    Chemical Equilibration in Weakly Coupled QCD

    A. Kurkela and A. Mazeliauskas, Chemical equilibration in weakly coupled QCD, Phys. Rev. D99, 054018 (2019), arXiv:1811.03068 [hep-ph]

  25. [25]

    Chemical Equilibration in Hadronic Collisions

    A. Kurkela and A. Mazeliauskas, Chemical Equilibration in Hadronic Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 142301 (2019), arXiv:1811.03040 [hep-ph]

  26. [26]

    Du and S

    X. Du and S. Schlichting, Equilibration of the Quark-Gluon Plasma at Finite Net-Baryon Density in QCD Kinetic Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 122301 (2021), arXiv:2012.09068 [hep- ph]

  27. [27]

    S. B. Cabodevila, C. A. Salgado, and B. Wu, Quark production and thermalization of the quark-gluon plasma, JHEP06, 145, arXiv:2311.07450 [hep-ph]

  28. [28]

    J. R. Bhatt and V . Sreekanth, Photon emission from out of equilibrium dissipative parton plasma, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E19, 299 (2010), arXiv:0901.1363 [hep-ph]

  29. [29]

    D. M. Elliott and D. H. Rischke, Chemical equilibration of quarks and gluons at RHIC and LHC energies, Nucl. Phys. A 671, 583 (2000), arXiv:nucl-th/9908004

  30. [30]

    A. El, A. Muronga, Z. Xu, and C. Greiner, A Relativistic dissipative hydrodynamic description for systems including particle number changing processes, Nucl. Phys. A848, 428 (2010), arXiv:1007.0705 [nucl-th]

  31. [31]

    Entropy production in chemically non-equilibrium quark-gluon plasma created in central Pb+Pb collisions at LHC energies

    V . V ovchenko, M. I. Gorenstein, L. M. Satarov, I. N. Mishus- tin, L. P. Csernai, I. Kisel, and H. St¨ocker, Entropy production in chemically nonequilibrium quark-gluon plasma created in central Pb+Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C93, 014906 (2016), arXiv:1510.01235 [hep-ph]

  32. [32]

    Chemical equilibration and thermal dilepton production from the quark gluon plasma at finite baryon density

    D. Dutta, K. Kumar, A. K. Mohanty, and R. K. Choudhury, Chemical equilibration and thermal dilepton production from the quark gluon plasma at finite baryon density, Phys. Rev. C 60, 014905 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9905245

  33. [33]

    Kampfer, O

    B. Kampfer, O. P. Pavlenko, A. Peshier, and G. Soff, Dilep- ton production in a chemically equilibrating, expanding, and hadronizing quark - gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. C52, 2704 (1995)

  34. [34]

    D. K. Srivastava, M. G. Mustafa, and B. Muller, Expanding quark - gluon plasmas: Transverse flow, chemical equilibra- tion and electromagnetic radiation, Phys. Rev. C56, 1064 (1997), arXiv:nucl-th/9611041

  35. [35]

    Photon production from non-equilibrium QGP in heavy ion collisions

    F. Gelis, H. Niemi, P. V . Ruuskanen, and S. S. Rasanen, Photon production from nonequilibrium QGP in heavy ion collisions, J. Phys. G30, S1031 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0403040

  36. [36]

    Electromagnetic probes of a pure-glue initial state in nucleus-nucleus collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider

    V . V ovchenko, I. A. Karpenko, M. I. Gorenstein, L. M. Sa- tarov, I. N. Mishustin, B. K ¨ampfer, and H. Stoecker, Electro- magnetic probes of a pure-glue initial state in nucleus-nucleus collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C94, 024906 (2016), arXiv:1604.06346 [nucl-th]

  37. [37]

    L. D. Landau, On the multiparticle production in high-energy collisions, Izv. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz.17, 51 (1953)

  38. [38]

    J. D. Bjorken, Highly Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Colli- sions: The Central Rapidity Region, Phys. Rev. D27, 140 (1983)

  39. [39]

    A New Family of Simple Solutions of Perfect Fluid Hydrodynamics

    T. Csorgo, M. I. Nagy, and M. Csanad, A New family of sim- ple solutions of perfect fluid hydrodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 663, 306 (2008), arXiv:nucl-th/0605070

  40. [40]

    Unified description of Bjorken and Landau 1+1 hydrodynamics

    A. Bialas, R. A. Janik, and R. B. Peschanski, Unified descrip- tion of Bjorken and Landau 1+1 hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. C 76, 054901 (2007), arXiv:0706.2108 [nucl-th]

  41. [41]

    S. S. Gubser and A. Yarom, Conformal hydrodynamics in Minkowski and de Sitter spacetimes, Nucl. Phys. B846, 469 (2011), arXiv:1012.1314 [hep-th]

  42. [42]

    S. S. Gubser, Symmetry constraints on generalizations of Bjorken flow, Phys. Rev. D82, 085027 (2010), arXiv:1006.0006 [hep-th]

  43. [43]

    S. Shi, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Family of new exact solutions for longitudinally expanding ideal fluids, Phys. Rev. C105, L021902 (2022), arXiv:2201.06670 [hep-ph]

  44. [44]

    Solutions of Conformal Israel-Stewart Relativistic Viscous Fluid Dynamics

    H. Marrochio, J. Noronha, G. S. Denicol, M. Luzum, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Solutions of Conformal Israel-Stewart Relativis- tic Viscous Fluid Dynamics, Phys. Rev. C91, 014903 (2015), arXiv:1307.6130 [nucl-th]

  45. [45]

    G. S. Denicol, U. W. Heinz, M. Martinez, J. Noronha, and M. Strickland, Studying the validity of relativistic hydrody- namics with a new exact solution of the Boltzmann equation, Phys. Rev. D90, 125026 (2014), arXiv:1408.7048 [hep-ph]

  46. [46]

    G. S. Denicol, U. W. Heinz, M. Martinez, J. Noronha, and M. Strickland, New Exact Solution of the Relativistic Boltz- mann Equation and its Hydrodynamic Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 202301 (2014), arXiv:1408.5646 [hep-ph]

  47. [47]

    Anisotropic hydrodynamics for conformal Gubser flow

    M. Nopoush, R. Ryblewski, and M. Strickland, Anisotropic hydrodynamics for conformal Gubser flow, Phys. Rev. D91, 045007 (2015), arXiv:1410.6790 [nucl-th]

  48. [48]

    Anisotropic fluid dynamics for Gubser flow

    M. Martinez, M. McNelis, and U. Heinz, Anisotropic fluid dynamics for Gubser flow, Phys. Rev. C95, 054907 (2017), arXiv:1703.10955 [nucl-th]

  49. [49]

    On higher order and anisotropic hydrodynamics for Bjorken and Gubser flows

    C. Chattopadhyay, U. Heinz, S. Pal, and G. Vujanovic, Higher order and anisotropic hydrodynamics for Bjorken and Gub- ser flows, Phys. Rev. C97, 064909 (2018), arXiv:1801.07755 [nucl-th]

  50. [50]

    Evolution of magnetic fields from the 3+1 dimensional self-similar and Gubser flows in ideal relativistic magnetohydrodynamics

    M. Shokri and N. Sadooghi, Evolution of magnetic fields from the 3 + 1 dimensional self-similar and Gubser flows in ideal relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, JHEP11, 181, arXiv:1807.09487 [nucl-th]

  51. [51]

    Wang, X.-Q

    D.-L. Wang, X.-Q. Xie, S. Fang, and S. Pu, Analytic solu- tions of relativistic dissipative spin hydrodynamics with radial expansion in Gubser flow, Phys. Rev. D105, 114050 (2022), arXiv:2112.15535 [hep-ph]

  52. [52]

    Far-from-equilibrium attractors and nonlinear dynamical systems approach to the Gubser flow

    A. Behtash, C. N. Cruz-Camacho, and M. Martinez, Far-from- equilibrium attractors and nonlinear dynamical systems ap- proach to the Gubser flow, Phys. Rev. D97, 044041 (2018), arXiv:1711.01745 [hep-th]

  53. [53]

    G. S. Denicol and J. Noronha, Hydrodynamic attractor and the fate of perturbative expansions in Gubser flow, Phys. Rev. D 99, 116004 (2019), arXiv:1804.04771 [nucl-th]

  54. [54]

    Ingles, J

    K. Ingles, J. Salinas San Mart´ın, W. Serenone, and J. Noronha- Hostler, Viscous Gubser flow with conserved charges to benchmark fluid simulations, (2025), arXiv:2503.20021 [nucl-th]

  55. [55]

    Singh, J

    K. Singh, J. Dey, and R. Sahoo, Electric field induction in quark-gluon plasma due to thermoelectric effects, Phys. Rev. D110, 114051 (2024), arXiv:2405.12510 [hep-ph]. 20

  56. [56]

    Building up the elliptic flow: analytical insights

    Y . Hatta and B.-W. Xiao, Building up the elliptic flow: analyt- ical insights, Phys. Lett. B736, 180 (2014), arXiv:1405.1984 [nucl-th]

  57. [57]

    Magnetohydrodynamics, charged currents and directed flow in heavy ion collisions

    U. Gursoy, D. Kharzeev, and K. Rajagopal, Magnetohydrody- namics, charged currents and directed flow in heavy ion colli- sions, Phys. Rev. C89, 054905 (2014), arXiv:1401.3805 [hep- ph]

  58. [58]

    Flow harmonics $v_n$ at finite density

    Y . Hatta, A. Monnai, and B.-W. Xiao, Flow harmonics vn at finite density, Phys. Rev. D92, 114010 (2015), arXiv:1505.04226 [hep-ph]

  59. [59]

    Bagchi, A

    P. Bagchi, A. Das, and A. P. Mishra, Does Quarkonia Suppres- sion serve as a probe for the deconfinement in small systems?, Phys. Rev. D110, 014017 (2024), arXiv:2310.12267 [nucl-th]

  60. [60]

    C. R. Singh, P. Bagchi, R. Sahoo, and J.-e. Alam, Ex- ploring QGP-like phenomena with charmonia in p+p col- lisions at s=13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D112, 014017 (2025), arXiv:2501.00753 [hep-ph]

  61. [61]

    Paquet, Thermal photon production in Gubser inviscid relativistic fluid dynamics, Phys

    J.-F. Paquet, Thermal photon production in Gubser inviscid relativistic fluid dynamics, Phys. Rev. C108, 064912 (2023), arXiv:2305.10669 [nucl-th]

  62. [62]

    L. J. Naik and V . Sreekanth, Thermal dilepton production within conformal viscous Gubser flow, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 664 (2025), arXiv:2506.01500 [hep-ph]

  63. [63]

    Dwibedi, A

    A. Dwibedi, A. K. Panda, S. Ghosh, and V . Roy, Probing Dy- namical Electrical Conductivity via Dilepton Emission: A Ki- netic theory approach, (2025), arXiv:2508.16988 [nucl-th]

  64. [64]

    E. L. Feinberg, Direct Production of Photons and Dileptons in Thermodynamical Models of Multiple Hadron Production, Nuovo Cim. A34, 391 (1976)

  65. [65]

    E. V . Shuryak, Quark-Gluon Plasma and Hadronic Production of Leptons, Photons and Psions, Phys. Lett. B78, 150 (1978)

  66. [66]

    J. I. Kapusta, P. Lichard, and D. Seibert, High-energy photons from quark - gluon plasma versus hot hadronic gas, Phys. Rev. D44, 2774 (1991), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 47, 4171 (1993)]

  67. [67]

    Direct Photons from Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions

    T. Peitzmann and M. H. Thoma, Direct photons from rel- ativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rept.364, 175 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0111114

  68. [68]

    Thermal Electromagnetic Radiation in Heavy-Ion Collisions

    R. Rapp and H. van Hees, Thermal Electromagnetic Radia- tion in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Eur. Phys. J. A52, 257 (2016), arXiv:1608.05279 [hep-ph]

  69. [69]

    David, Direct real photons in relativistic heavy ion colli- sions, Rept

    G. David, Direct real photons in relativistic heavy ion colli- sions, Rept. Prog. Phys.83, 046301 (2020), arXiv:1907.08893 [nucl-ex]

  70. [70]

    Geurts and R.-A

    F. Geurts and R.-A. Tripolt, Electromagnetic probes: Theory and experiment, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.128, 104004 (2023), arXiv:2210.01622 [hep-ph]

  71. [71]

    J. R. Bhatt, H. Mishra, and V . Sreekanth, Cavitation and ther- mal dilepton production in QGP, Nucl. Phys. A875, 181 (2012), arXiv:1101.5597 [hep-ph]

  72. [72]

    Photon elliptic flow in relativistic heavy-ion collisions: hadronic versus partonic sources

    O. Linnyk, V . P. Konchakovski, W. Cassing, and E. L. Bratkovskaya, Photon elliptic flow in relativistic heavy-ion collisions: hadronic versus partonic sources, Phys. Rev. C88, 034904 (2013), arXiv:1304.7030 [nucl-th]

  73. [73]

    Quark and gluon distribution functions in a viscous quark-gluon plasma medium and dilepton production via $q\bar{q}$-- annihilation

    V . Chandra and V . Sreekanth, Quark and gluon distribution functions in a viscous quark-gluon plasma medium and dilep- ton production viaq¯qannihilation, Phys. Rev. D92, 094027 (2015), arXiv:1511.01208 [nucl-th]

  74. [74]

    Electromagnetic radiation as a probe of the initial state and of viscous dynamics in relativistic nuclear collisions

    G. Vujanovic, J.-F. Paquet, G. S. Denicol, M. Luzum, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Electromagnetic radiation as a probe of the initial state and of viscous dynamics in relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C94, 014904 (2016), arXiv:1602.01455 [nucl-th]

  75. [75]

    L. J. Naik, V . Sreekanth, M. Kurian, and V . Chandra, Ther- mal dilepton production in collisional hot QCD medium in the presence of chromo-turbulent fields, J. Phys. G49, 075103 (2022), arXiv:2003.13645 [hep-ph]

  76. [76]

    G ¨otz, A

    N. G ¨otz, A. Sch ¨afer, O. Garcia-Montero, J.-F. Paquet, H. Elfner, and C. Gale (SMASH), Out-of-equilibrium pho- ton production in the late stages of relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C105, 044910 (2022), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 109, 049901 (2024)], arXiv:2111.13603 [hep-ph]

  77. [77]

    L. J. Naik and V . Sreekanth, Second order hydrodynamics based on effective kinetic theory and electromagnetic signals from QGP, J. Phys. G50, 025102 (2023), arXiv:2207.05310 [nucl-th]

  78. [78]

    Garcia-Montero, A

    O. Garcia-Montero, A. Mazeliauskas, P. Plaschke, and S. Schlichting, Pre-equilibrium photons from the early stages of heavy-ion collisions, JHEP03, 053, arXiv:2308.09747 [hep-ph]

  79. [79]

    Dilepton production at next-to-leading order and intermediate invariant- mass observables,

    J. Churchill, L. Du, C. Gale, G. Jackson, and S. Jeon, Dilepton production at next-to-leading order and intermediate invariant-mass observables, Phys. Rev. C109, 044915 (2024), arXiv:2311.06675 [nucl-th]

  80. [80]

    Bremsstrahlung and photon production in thermal QCD

    P. Aurenche, F. Gelis, R. Kobes, and H. Zaraket, Bremsstrahlung and photon production in thermal QCD, Phys. Rev. D58, 085003 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9804224

Showing first 80 references.