Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

On the Cross-lingual Transferability of Monolingual Representations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.11856 v3 pith:DQTCAILT submitted 2019-10-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

On the Cross-lingual Transferability of Monolingual Representations

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords cross-lingualmultilinguallanguagelanguagesmodelsmonolingualabilityabstractions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

State-of-the-art unsupervised multilingual models (e.g., multilingual BERT) have been shown to generalize in a zero-shot cross-lingual setting. This generalization ability has been attributed to the use of a shared subword vocabulary and joint training across multiple languages giving rise to deep multilingual abstractions. We evaluate this hypothesis by designing an alternative approach that transfers a monolingual model to new languages at the lexical level. More concretely, we first train a transformer-based masked language model on one language, and transfer it to a new language by learning a new embedding matrix with the same masked language modeling objective, freezing parameters of all other layers. This approach does not rely on a shared vocabulary or joint training. However, we show that it is competitive with multilingual BERT on standard cross-lingual classification benchmarks and on a new Cross-lingual Question Answering Dataset (XQuAD). Our results contradict common beliefs of the basis of the generalization ability of multilingual models and suggest that deep monolingual models learn some abstractions that generalize across languages. We also release XQuAD as a more comprehensive cross-lingual benchmark, which comprises 240 paragraphs and 1190 question-answer pairs from SQuAD v1.1 translated into ten languages by professional translators.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MIMO: Multilingual Information Retrieval via Monolingual Objectives

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MIMO is a two-stage distillation-plus-contrastive framework that anchors multilingual embeddings to a monolingual English space and outperforms prior cross-lingual baselines on MLIR and multi-monolingual benchmarks.

  2. LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LIMO achieves 63.3% on AIME24 and 95.6% on MATH500 via supervised fine-tuning on roughly 1% of the data used by prior models, supporting the claim that minimal strategic examples suffice when pre-training has already ...

  3. Neural FOXP2 -- Language Specific Neuron Steering for Targeted Language Improvement in LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-02 reject novelty 5.0

    A three-stage SAE-plus-SVD steering recipe claims to make Hindi or Spanish the default language of an LLM at inference time, but the visible manuscript reports only expected, not measured, outcomes.

  4. Multilingual and Multimodal LLMs in the Wild: Building for Low-Resource Languages

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A tutorial synthesizing foundations, recent models such as PALO and Maya, and low-cost methods for tri-modal multilingual AI in resource-constrained settings.