Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 32 cited by

Skill-Pro: Learning Reusable Skills from Experience via Non-Parametric PPO for LLM Agents

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a frozen LLM agent can convert its own interaction experience into a small, reusable library of natural-language procedural skills, and that this procedural memory outperforms raw episodic memory under extreme compress

desk verdict Skill-Pro is a plausible skill-library framework let down by an in-sample PPO Gate and noisy statistics, but the cross-agent transfer keeps it worth a serious look. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.01869 v3 pith:EOLHNYZR submitted 2026-02-02 cs.AI

Qirui Mi , Zhijian Ma , Mengyue Yang , Haoxuan Li , Yisen Wang , Haifeng Zhang , Jun Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AI
keywords LLMagentsproceduralmemoryskillreusenon-parametricoptimizationPPOsemanticgradientscompressionlong-termautonomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that an LLM agent can turn raw interaction episodes into reusable procedural skills — each defined by activation, execution, and termination conditions — and evolve that skill library purely by editing text, never updating the model. To do this, it introduces the Skill-MDP as a formal setting and Non-Parametric PPO: semantic gradients propose candidate skill revisions, a PPO-style gate filters candidates using likelihood ratios on past trajectories, and online scores prune low performers. On ALFWorld and TextArena it reports reuse rates above 80% across tasks and agents, better returns than episodic-memory baselines, and a stored memory of only a few hundred tokens. A sympathetic reader would care because if true, long-term agent autonomy could be cheap: a frozen LLM accumulates expertise as a compact, inspectable, transferable skill library instead of growing episodic logs or being fine-tuned.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Skill, a natural-language procedure ω = ⟨Iω, πω, βω⟩ (activation, execution, termination), managed in a Skill-MDP pool. The argument-carrying mechanism is Non-Parametric PPO: semantic-gradient generation (LLM-based hindsight attribution and aggregation) plays the role of the gradient update on skill text, while the PPO Gate — a clipped likelihood-ratio surrogate computed under the frozen LLM on batch trajectories — plays the role of trust-region verification. Online advantage-style scoring governs pruning, sustaining a compact, high-quality skill pool.

What would settle it

Collect candidate skills that receive a positive PPO-Gate score but whose revised text is a near-paraphrase of the old skill plus a vague instruction; run both old and candidate skills on fresh episodes under the same frozen LLM. If candidates are accepted but do not produce better returns, the likelihood-ratio counterfactual is not a faithful predictor of behavioral improvement. A reader could settle this by checking whether PPO-Gate scores correlate positively with actual rollout return differences across many candidates.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that procedural memory is learnable by a frozen LLM through a non-parametric analogue of PPO. Experience is organized as a Skill-MDP, where the agent's memory is a pool of natural-language skills; each skill has activation, execution, and termination conditions. After each batch, hindsight attribution produces per-trajectory semantic gradients, aggregated into an update direction; candidate skills are then admitted only if a clipped-importance-ratio functional (the PPO Gate) is positive; score-based maintenance keeps only skills with positive online advantage. The paper argues this turns passive episodic narratives into executable, reusable procedures, and reports in-dom

Load-bearing premise

The verification step only works if re-scoring past actions under a candidate skill's text really tells you how the agent will behave under that skill in the future; if a rewritten skill can sound right without being followed right, a positive gate score proves nothing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, an agent can accumulate procedural memory that is orders of magnitude smaller than episodic alternatives — 816 stored tokens versus hundreds of thousands — while improving returns.
  • Skills learned on one benchmark task can be reused on harder variants and by different LLM backbones without retraining, suggesting the skills encode task structure rather than model-specific phrasing.
  • Ablation results indicate that both semantic-gradient candidate generation and PPO-Gate verification are needed; removing either degrades performance and pool quality.
  • Score-based pruning, not FIFO replacement, is what preserves long-term evolutionary gains, implying that memory quality is maintained by selective retention rather than simple recency.
  • Because skills are explicit text, the accumulated expertise is inspectable and auditable, which could facilitate debugging and human oversight of agent behavior.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the central claim holds, agent memory could be treated as a compressible executable asset rather than raw data; organizations might ship a skill library instead of a fine-tuned model, and the same library could serve as an interface between different model versions.
  • The PPO Gate's reliance on frozen-LLM likelihood ratios suggests that verification power may scale with the model's instruction-following fidelity: on models that do not reliably follow written skills, a candidate that reads well may not change behavior, so Skill-Pro's gains could concentrate in models that already follow text reliably.
  • A testable extension not proposed by the paper: use the online score as a stopping signal for skill evolution, halting refinement of a skill lineage once its score plateaus, which could further reduce compute.
  • The high cross-agent reuse rates hint that the same pipeline could distill expertise from a large model into portable skill prompts for a smaller one, an application the paper only partially explores.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Skill-Pro, a framework for LLM agents to learn a pool of natural-language procedural skills from interaction trajectories without updating the base model. Skills are formalized as (activation condition, execution procedure, termination condition) and selected at decision time. Skill evolution is driven by 'semantic gradients' extracted from batched trajectories to propose candidate skills, a 'PPO Gate' that scores candidates by a clipped importance-ratio objective computed under the frozen LLM, and score-based pruning. Experiments in ALFWorld and TextArena Mastermind report higher reuse rates, better task performance, and much lower memory cost than episodic-memory baselines, with cross-task and cross-agent transfer.

Significance. If the verification mechanism holds, the paper would demonstrate a meaningful advance: a frozen LLM can autonomously compile compact, reusable procedural knowledge from interaction, with transparent skill lineages and no parameter updates. The Skill-MDP formalization and the explicit, inspectable skill representation are useful contributions; the code availability and the component-wise ablations are assets. However, the central claims of 'superior reuse rates' and 'significant performance gains' are not established by the current evidence because the PPO Gate is scored in-sample on the same trajectories used for candidate generation, and the reuse-rate metric is confounded by pool size. These concerns are addressable within the manuscript's scope, but they are load-bearing for the paper's main conclusions.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.2, Algorithm 1 (steps 2–3)] The PPO Gate score J(ω') = L_CLIP(ω') is computed on the same batch T^(B) from which the semantic gradients are aggregated and candidate skills ω' are generated. A candidate that simply restates the aggregated gradient's advice will assign higher likelihood to high-advantage actions in that same batch by construction, so a positive Gate score does not demonstrate counterfactual improvement on new episodes. The w/o PPO Gate ablation only shows that unconstrained candidates are harmful; it does not show that the Gate selects for genuine cross-episode gains. Please validate the Gate on a held-out batch (e.g., generate candidates from a training batch and score on a validation batch), or report the correlation between Gate scores and subsequent episodes' returns.
  2. [Appendix B.4, Section 5.1 (Reuse Metrics)] The reuse-rate metrics are defined as the fraction of stored units invoked at least once during evaluation. This definition mechanically favors small pools: Skill-Pro stores about 8 skills (816 total tokens / 102 tokens per unit) whereas baselines store hundreds or thousands of episodic units, so even incidental invocation yields much higher reuse rates for Skill-Pro. Table 1's 'superior reuse rates' are therefore not evidence of skill quality. Please add retrieval-precision-style metrics (e.g., precision@k, fraction of episodes with any retrieval, or performance at matched memory budgets) and report the stored-pool size per method.
  3. [Tables 2 and 4] Several headline differences are within one standard deviation of the best baseline, e.g., Mastermind-v0 0.606±0.234 vs G-Memory 0.577±0.052; ALFWorld OOD 0.909±0.287 vs AWM 0.900±0.042; cross-agent Qwen3-32B 0.615±0.290 vs AWM 0.592±0.183. In Table 4, PPO Gate Pass Rate carries standard deviations of 36–49 percentage points (e.g., 59.49%±49.09%), and Online Score differences are small with overlapping errors. Without paired significance tests (bootstrap or Wilcoxon over the 50 episodes) and effect sizes, the abstract's claim of 'significant performance gains' is unsupported. Please report per-episode paired differences and confidence intervals.
  4. [Eq. (6), §4.2] The importance ratio ρ_t(ω') = π_LLM(a_t|s_t,ω') / π_LLM(a_t|s_t,ω) is a next-token likelihood ratio of the frozen LLM given two skill texts. A positive L_CLIP score means the candidate text assigns higher likelihood to previously observed good actions, but it does not verify that the agent will reliably follow the candidate's activation, execution, and termination conditions in new episodes. The entire verification mechanism rests on this counterfactual assumption. The paper should include a direct test—for example, admitting candidates with positive versus negative Gate scores and comparing their subsequent episode returns, or otherwise measuring the correlation between Gate scores and held-out performance.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1] Several rows contain garbled or inconsistently formatted entries (e.g., '0.111±0. 0.146±0.064' and '1165272675 ±414 (T)'). Please reformat the table so all means and standard deviations are legible and unit-type labels are aligned.
  2. [§4.2 and §4.3] The running baseline <code>\bar{R}</code> is used to compute advantages and online scores, but its update rule and initialization are never specified. This is needed for reproducibility; please add the exact formula and hyperparameters.
  3. [§5.3, Table 3] For the 'w/o PPO Gate' variant, the PPO Gate Pass Rate is reported as 100.00%±0.00%. This is true by construction and should be marked as 'N/A' or explained to avoid confusion.
  4. [§5.4, Fig. 5] The claim that skill selection patterns are 'remarkably stable' across LLM backbones and task difficulties is supported only by visual inspection of Fig. 5. A quantitative measure, such as a distributional distance (e.g., Jensen–Shannon divergence) between invocation distributions, would strengthen the claim.
  5. [Appendix D] The semantic-gradient example is helpful. It would be even more illustrative to show the corresponding aggregated gradient and the resulting candidate skill after the update, not just the per-trajectory gradient.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

PPO Gate 'verification' is scored on the same batch used to generate candidates, making its counterfactual-quality prediction partly in-sample; held-out benchmarks remain independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.2, Eqs. (6)-(8); Algorithm 1 steps 2-3]
    "we evaluate a candidate Skill ω′ using batch-size trajectories collected under the previous Skill ω. ... ρ_t(ω′) = π_LLM(a_t|s_t, ω′)/π_LLM(a_t|s_t, ω) ... Since the PPO Gate is based on advantage estimates, a positive score indicates that the candidate is expected to outperform the previous Skill under the trust-region constraint."

    Algorithm 1 generates candidates from the same batch: per-trajectory semantic gradients {g_i} are extracted from T^(B), aggregated to ¯g_ω, and ω′ = ω ⊕ ¯g_ω; the Gate then computes J(ω′) = L_CLIP(ω′) with advantages Â_t from that same T^(B). Thus a candidate that encodes the hindsight fixes for the failures in T^(B) will, by construction, increase likelihood on high-advantage actions and reduce likelihood on the penalized actions of that batch. A positive Gate score therefore largely certifies fit to the generating batch, not independent counterfactual improvement, yet the paper presents it as 'verification' and 'expected to outperform' the old skill.

full rationale

The only load-bearing circularity is the in-sample PPO Gate: candidate generation and candidate scoring both use the same batch T^(B), so the 'positive score' is a goodness-of-fit measure on the training trajectories rather than a held-out prediction of reuse quality. This weakens the claim that the Gate 'robustly verifies' skills, but it does not make the whole paper circular: the headline comparisons in Tables 1-2 are measured on held-out in-domain, cross-task, and cross-agent episodes, and the memory-compression and reuse-rate results are external empirical facts. There is no reliance on self-citations or on a uniqueness theorem. Score 5 reflects one substantial in-sample verification step that partially undermines the 'Non-Parametric PPO' narrative, while the final benchmark evidence retains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The framework rests on several unstated hyperparameters and on the assumption that LLM text-likelihood and LLM-generated feedback are faithful learning signals. The invented constructs (Semantic Gradient, PPO Gate) are internal procedural tools without independent falsifiable handles. The central claim therefore depends more on prompt-engineering reliability than on a formal optimization guarantee.

free parameters (5)
  • Skill pool capacity K = unspecified
    Controls how aggressively skills are pruned; no value reported in the main text.
  • PPO clip threshold ε = unspecified
    Standard PPO hyperparameter, not reported; changes which candidates pass the gate.
  • Number of candidates N_c = unspecified
    Number of semantic-gradient candidate skills sampled per refinement; not specified.
  • Running baseline ¯R update rule = unspecified
    Used for advantage estimates in Eq. (6)-(8); the update schedule is not defined.
  • Cosine-similarity threshold for semantic redundancy pruning = unspecified
    Used in Algorithm 1 to remove 'semantically redundant' skills; threshold not reported.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption LLM next-token likelihood under a skill text reflects the skill's causal effect on behavior.
    The PPO Gate (Eq. 6) uses π_LLM(a_t|s_t,ω') as a counterfactual for how the candidate skill would change behavior.
  • ad hoc to paper LLM-generated semantic gradients from hindsight attribution are reliable and stable update directions.
    Section 4.1 assumes that aggregating per-trajectory text refinements yields a signal that improves expected return.
  • domain assumption Return-to-go minus a running baseline is an adequate advantage estimator without a learned value function.
    Section 4.2 replaces value-based advantages with G_t − ¯R, which can be high-variance in sparse-reward tasks.
  • domain assumption Natural-language skill descriptions transfer across different LLM backbones.
    Cross-agent experiments assume skills written for Gemma-2-9B are interpretable and executable by Qwen3-32B and LLaMA-3.3-70B.
  • domain assumption The Skill-MDP hierarchical factorization μ(ω|s)π_LLM(a|s,ω) is a sufficient model of agent behavior.
    Section 3.1 assumes that all learning can be pushed into the skill pool while keeping selection and action policies fixed.
invented entities (2)
  • Semantic Gradient
    purpose: Natural-language update direction for refining a skill's activation, execution, and termination conditions.
    No external falsifiable handle; it is an LLM-generated text artifact whose reliability is asserted rather than measured.
  • PPO Gate
    purpose: Verification filter that admits only candidate skills with positive clipped-surrogate score on historical trajectories.
    Computed from the same frozen LLM and the same batch used to generate candidates; no independent benchmark calibration.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Skill-Pro: Learning Reusable Skills from Experience via Non-Parametric PPO for LLM Agents." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EOLHNYZR

@misc{pith2026260201869,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Skill-Pro: Learning Reusable Skills from Experience via Non-Parametric PPO for LLM Agents},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EOLHNYZR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.01869}
}
read the original abstract

LLM-driven agents excel at sequential decision-making but often rely on on-the-fly reasoning, re-deriving solutions even in recurring scenarios. This insufficient experience reuse leads to computational redundancy and instability. To bridge this gap, we propose Skill-Pro, a framework enabling agents to autonomously learn reusable procedural skills from interaction experiences without parameter updates. By formalizing a Skill-MDP, Skill-Pro transforms passive episodic narratives into executable Skills defined by activation, execution, and termination conditions to ensure executability. To achieve reliable reusability without capability degradation, we introduce Non-Parametric PPO, which leverages semantic gradients for high-quality candidate generation and a PPO Gate for robust Skill verification. Through score-based maintenance, Skill-Pro sustains compact, high-quality procedural memory. Experimental results across in-domain, cross-task, and cross-agent scenarios demonstrate that Skill-Pro achieves superior reuse rates and significant gains with extreme memory compression. Visualized evolutionary trajectories and Skill distributions further reveal how Skill-Pro transparently accumulates, refines, and reuses procedural knowledge to facilitate long-term autonomy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.01869 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Episodic memory versus procedural memory in LLM￾driven agents. Episodic memory retrieves past interactions for ref￾erence, requiring inference-heavy reasoning at decision time. Pro￾cedural memory encodes reusable procedural Skills that directly map situations to actions, enabling efficient experience reuse. this performance is often driven by on-the-fly reasoning, where agents interpret prompts, observations, and fe… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of the Skill-Pro framework. (Left) Skill-MDP: The agent selects a Skill ω based on state st and activation conditions. A frozen LLM executes ω into primitive actions at over multiple steps until termination. Post-episode trajectories T are stored in a buffer. (Middle) Procedural Skills: Skills are dynamically managed via refinement, generation, and score-based pruning to maintain pool quality. (Right) Non-P… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Evolutionary Lineage of Skills. Gray bars represent Skill lifespans along the evolutionary timeline (horizontal axis). Dashed vertical lines denote refinement events where a parent Skill evolves into children; multiple lines indicate repeated refinements. Red ‘X’ markers signify pruning of underperforming variants for pool efficiency. The dark blue arrow and sequential alignment (e.g., v1 → v13) track the sustained … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Training curves of Skill-Pro and ablation variants. Solid lines and shaded areas denote the smoothed mean and stan￾dard deviation of average returns, respectively. as its candidates must still pass trust-region verification. Score-based maintenance is critical for pres…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Skill distribution across LLM agents and task com￾plexities. Bars represent the empirical invocation probability for each skill categorized by different LLM backbones (top) and task difficulty levels in Mastermind-v0 (bottom). N denotes the aver￾age number of skill inv…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Training curves of ALFWorld. Solid lines and shaded areas denote the smoothed mean and standard deviation of average returns, respectively. where I[·] is an indicator function and T is the total number of decision steps. ∆Prompt Tokens / Step (↓). This metric captures …

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 32 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SkillJack: Persistent Skill Backdoors in Self-Evolving Agents

    cs.CR 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Poisoned experience records that an agent compiles into reusable skills become harder to detect, get reused on later tasks, and survive deletion of the original records.

  2. EvoAgentBench: Benchmarking Agent Self-Evolution via Ability Transfer

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    EvoAgentBench is a multi-domain benchmark for agent self-evolution that guarantees train-side ability support for every test task, revealing that curated skills transfer reliably but automatic methods remain brittle.

  3. LLM Agents Are Latent Context Managers: Eliciting Self-Managed Context via State Proprioception

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    VISTA supplies LLM agents with a visible proprioceptive dashboard of typed context blocks, enabling untrained self-management that lifts performance on long-horizon tool-use benchmarks across multiple model scales.

  4. UCOB: Learning to Utilize and Evolve Agentic Skills via Credit-Aware On-Policy Bidirectional Self-Distillation

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    UCOB uses local return comparisons between skill and no-skill views to choose which view teaches the other, improving agent training on ALFWorld and WebShop.

  5. PreAct: Computer-Using Agents that Get Faster on Repeated Tasks

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    PreAct compiles successful agent executions into verifiable state-machine programs for 8.5-13x faster replay on repeated tasks, with an independent evaluator check before storing each program.

  6. ElasticMem: Latent Memory as a Learnable Resource for LLM Agents

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    ElasticMem enables LLM agents to learn adaptive latent memory retrieval and elastic budget allocation, improving QA accuracy by 24-26% and ALFWorld success by 27-66% over baselines with lower token cost.

  7. Skill-CMIB: Multimodal Agent Skill for Consistent Action via Conditional Multimodal Information Bottleneck

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    CMIB uses a conditional multimodal information bottleneck to create reusable agent skills that separate verbalizable text content from predictive perceptual residuals, improving execution stability.

  8. MEMOREPAIR: Barrier-First Cascade Repair in Agentic Memory

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    MemoRepair formalizes the cascade update problem in agentic memory and solves it via a min-cut reduction that eliminates invalidated memory exposure to 0% while recovering 91-94% of valid successors at 57-76% of basel...

  9. Co-Evolving LLM Decision and Skill Bank Agents for Long-Horizon Tasks

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    COSPLAY co-evolves an LLM decision agent with a skill bank agent to improve long-horizon game performance, reporting over 25.1% average reward gains versus frontier LLM baselines on single-player benchmarks.

  10. SKILLER: Language-Level Reinforcement Learning for Reusable Skill Extraction in Small Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SKILLER iteratively rewrites natural-language skills for small LLMs using a frontier-model actor-critic loop, achieving up to +20.4 points on SWE-Skills-Bench but tying or losing on some benchmark-model combinations.

  11. MEGA: Self-Evolving Agent Optimization Infrastructure via Wisdom Graph

    cs.AI 2026-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    MEGA reports higher benchmark scores than prior agent optimizers, but its central claim of a self-evolving wisdom graph is not actually demonstrated by the presented experiments.

  12. SkillZip: Contract-Preserving Graph Compression for Scalable Agent Skill Libraries

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SkillZip compresses LLM agent skill libraries into section-level graphs with reversible, contract-preserving macros, improving task reward and retrieval while cutting context.

  13. Progressive Agent Skill Generation via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Skill-α uses reinforcement learning with a rollback reward to progressively edit SKILL.md-style procedure files, improving downstream success rates over pipeline baselines on CL-Bench, SpreadsheetBench, and tau2-bench.

  14. Skill Self-Play: Pushing the Frontier of LLM Capability with Co-Evolving Skills

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Skill Self-Play uses an evolving skill library to guide LLM self-training, improving tool-call and reasoning accuracy beyond unguided self-play on five model backbones.

  15. From Memory to Skills: Evidence-Grounded Co-Evolution Governance for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MSCE, a training-free memory–skill co-evolution framework, converts grounded traces into callable skills through reflection-weighted value backfilling and outperforms prior agent memory/skill baselines on EvoAgentBenc...

  16. Experience Memory Graph: One-Shot Error Correction for Agents

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Experience Memory Graph replaces online LLM reflection with offline graph matching between failed and expert trajectories, extracting correction instructions that let agents succeed in one test-time pass on ALFWorld a...

  17. Memory as a Controlled Process: Learned Adaptive Memory Management for LLM Agents

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A tabular UCB controller trained on task success improves LLM-agent memory use over fixed heuristics, without extra LLM calls.

  18. Metis: Bridging Text and Code Memory for Self-Evolving Agents

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Metis combines text and code memory hierarchically for self-evolving agents, claiming up to 20.6% higher accuracy and 22.8% lower cost than ReAct on the AppWorld benchmark.

  19. Organize then Retrieve: Hierarchical Memory Navigation for Efficient Agents

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    HORMA builds a hierarchical memory structure from agent experiences and trains a lightweight RL navigator to retrieve minimal sufficient context, yielding better task performance with at most 22.17% of baseline token ...

  20. SkillJuror: Measuring How Agent Skill Organization Changes Runtime Behavior

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Empirical study finds Progressive Disclosure raises distinct resources touched (1.18 to 3.85) and uptake events (1.33 to 3.92) per trajectory, adds 17 passing trials out of 410 (+4.1%), with gains task-dependent.

  21. SkillPyramid: A Hierarchical Skill Consolidation Framework for Self-Evolving Agents

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SkillPyramid introduces a hierarchical skill consolidation framework with self-evolution, reporting 38% higher average reward and 27.7% fewer execution steps on ALFWorld, WebShop, and ScienceWorld across four models.

  22. SkillRevise: Improving LLM-Authored Agent Skills via Trace-Conditioned Skill Revision

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SkillRevise iteratively refines initial LLM-generated agent skills using execution traces to diagnose defects and apply repairs, raising success rates from 36.05% to 61.63% on SkillsBench across three benchmarks and f...

  23. SkillOpt: Executive Strategy for Self-Evolving Agent Skills

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SkillOpt introduces a validation-gated text-space optimizer for agent skills that outperforms human, one-shot, and prior optimization baselines across 52 model-benchmark-harness combinations.

  24. From Raw Experience to Skill Consumption: A Systematic Study of Model-Generated Agent Skills

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic study across five domains finds model-generated skills yield average gains but non-uniform negative transfer, with a meta-skill improving extraction quality.

  25. EvoIR-Agent: Self-Evolving Image Restoration Agentic System via Experience-Driven Learning

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    EvoIR-Agent introduces a hierarchical experience pool and self-evolving mechanism to improve training-free image restoration agents, claiming significant metric leads and better performance-efficiency balance.

  26. MAP: A Map-then-Act Paradigm for Long-Horizon Interactive Agent Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    MAP improves LLM agent reasoning by constructing a structured cognitive map of the environment before task execution, yielding performance gains on benchmarks like ARC-AGI-3 and superior training data via the new MAP-...

  27. Dynamic Skill Lifecycle Management for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SLIM dynamically optimizes the active external skill set in agentic RL via leave-one-skill-out marginal contribution estimates and lifecycle operations, delivering a 7.1% average gain over baselines on ALFWorld and Se...

  28. SkillLens: Adaptive Multi-Granularity Skill Reuse for Cost-Efficient LLM Agents

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SkillLens organizes skills into policies-strategies-procedures-primitives layers, retrieves via degree-corrected random walk, and uses a verifier for local adaptation, yielding up to 6.31 pp gains on MuLocbench and ra...

  29. From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.5 of 10

    Compact Gene representations of experience outperform documentation-oriented Skill packages for test-time control and iterative evolution in code-solving tasks, with measured gains on CritPt from 9.1% to 18.57% and 17...

  30. From Relevance to Execution Utility: Reward-Aware Dynamic Execution Gating for Skill-Based LLM Agents

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A lightweight post-retrieval gate trained on verifier feedback can skip most low-value LLM agent executions while retaining most of the achievable reward.

  31. SkillsVote: Lifecycle Governance of Agent Skills from Collection, Recommendation to Evolution

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    SkillsVote is a governance system for agent skills that profiles corpora, recommends via search, and gates updates on successful reusable outcomes, yielding benchmark gains without model changes.

  32. A Comprehensive Survey on Agent Skills: Taxonomy, Techniques, and Applications

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper surveys agent skills for LLM agents, organizing the literature into a four-stage lifecycle of representation, acquisition, retrieval, and evolution while highlighting their role in system scalability.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

6 extracted references · cited by 32 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Choose a mathematically diverse starting guess (e.g., all unique)

  2. [2]

    Establish the initial search boundaries based on allowed range

  3. [3]

    •Termination: The first valid move is submitted and initial feedback is received

    Set the logic for tracking historical moves. •Termination: The first valid move is submitted and initial feedback is received. Execution Trajectory (Mastermind-v0): [GAME] You are playing Mastermind. You need to find the code that is 4 digits long, each digit from 1 to 6, with no duplicates. In your response, you can submit your guess in the following for...

  4. [4]

    Add a check for X

    Apply: Execute EACH strategy step one by one. For each step, explicitly reference the relevant part of the CURRENT STATEor feedback history. 3.Output: You MUST output ONLY one action in the specified format. Environment-Specific Constraints: •FrozenLake:<action>[direction]</action>. Valid:[up], [down], [left], [right]. •Mastermind:<action>[d1 d2 d3 ...]</...

  5. [5]

    IF” condition to ensure the skill only starts in valid states. •Policy (π): Update the 3–5 reasoning steps to bypass identified failure modes. •Termination (β): Update the “Stop IF

    Batch-level Aggregation: Identify systematic weaknesses across all gradients. Filter out noise and trajectory-specific details, focusing only on recurring patterns. 2.Semantic Update: Performω ′ =ω⊕¯gto refine the skill: •Initiation (I): Refine the “IF” condition to ensure the skill only starts in valid states. •Policy (π): Update the 3–5 reasoning steps ...

  6. [6]

    skill_name

    Strict Constraints: Use only state-checkable terms in the conditions; avoid vague language like ”successfully submitted” unless explicit feedback is present. Response Requirements (JSON Format):OutputEXACTLY ONEskill in strict JSON format. No explanations or extra text allowed. { "skill_name": "Concise_Name", "initiation": "IF ... AND ... (fully checkable...

    1980

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.