pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.19626 · v2 · pith:FLM44QBSnew · submitted 2025-11-24 · 🌀 gr-qc · nucl-th

Universal Relations with Dynamical Tides

Jayana A. Saes , Abhishek Hegade K. R. , Nicol\'as Yunes This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 05:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc nucl-th
keywords tidal deformabilityneutron starsquasi-universal relationsdynamical tidesgravitational wavesequation of statebinary mergers
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quasi-universal relations connect the static tidal deformability of neutron stars to its leading dynamical correction with at most 5 percent equation-of-state variation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes new relations that tie the static dimensionless tidal deformability Lambda to the power zero to both its leading dynamical correction Lambda to the power two and to the quantity square root of Lambda zero over Lambda two, which equals M omega star. These relations emerge from the small-frequency expansion of the relativistic tidal response and remain nearly independent of the equation of state when checked on a set of 59 models. A reader would care because the relations let gravitational-wave analyses include dynamical tidal effects in binary neutron-star inspirals without needing the full unknown equation of state.

Core claim

The authors identify new quasi-universal relations between the static, dimensionless tidal deformability (Lambda zero) and its leading-order dynamical correction (Lambda two), as well as between Lambda zero and sqrt(Lambda zero over Lambda two) which equals M omega star, obtained from the small-frequency expansion of the relativistic tidal response. Tested across 59 equations of state, the equation-of-state dependence stays below about 5 percent for the Lambda zero to Lambda two relation and below 2.8 percent for the Lambda zero to M omega star relation. The work also compares the dynamical tidal response to a Taylor expansion and a one-mode approximation, finding both capture the frequency-

What carries the argument

The small-frequency expansion of the relativistic tidal response that yields the parameters Lambda zero, Lambda two, and the derived M omega star.

If this is right

  • Dynamical tidal effects can be incorporated into gravitational-wave modeling through these simple relations instead of full frequency-dependent calculations.
  • The one-mode approximation matches the dynamical tidal response better than a Taylor expansion across most of the parameter space.
  • The relations reduce equation-of-state uncertainty when connecting different neutron-star observables such as compactness and tidal deformability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same relations could be checked in numerical simulations that go beyond the small-frequency limit to see how far the universality extends.
  • Future detectors with higher sensitivity might use the M omega star combination as an additional observable to tighten constraints on neutron-star radii.
  • If the relations persist in alternative gravity theories, they could serve as a test of general relativity in the strong-field regime.

Load-bearing premise

The 59 chosen equations of state form a representative sample of possible nuclear matter behaviors and the small-frequency expansion remains accurate throughout the relevant part of binary neutron-star inspirals.

What would settle it

A gravitational-wave measurement from a binary neutron-star event that yields values of Lambda zero and Lambda two lying more than 5 percent off the reported relation after accounting for measurement uncertainty.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.19626 by Abhishek Hegade K. R., Jayana A. Saes, Nicol\'as Yunes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Fractional difference between the dynamical tide and the static tide for different values of the compactness and the GW fre￾quency. As frequency increases, so does the contribution of the dy￾namical part. On the other hand, the validity of the series expansion at small frequencies can be evaluated by comparing Λ Tay(ω) with the fully dynamical tidal deformability Λ Dyn(ω), ob￾tained from the full numerical… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Frequency-dependent tidal deformability for the SLy EOS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Percent fractional difference between the fully dynamical tide and the second-order small-frequency expansion (left) or the effective￾one-mode approximation (right), as a function of compactness and GW frequency. As the frequency increases, the Taylor series expansion gradually loses accuracy, with deviations remaining below ∼ 25% across most of the parameter space. Only at high frequencies, combined with … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mass-Radius curves for the set of EOS considered in this [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relation between the dimensionless static tidal deforma [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Observations of neutron stars and the precise measurement of their macroscopic properties have provided valuable insights into fundamental physics, both by constraining the behavior of nuclear matter under extreme conditions and by enabling tests of general relativity in the strong-field regime. In this context, equation-of-state-insensitive or ``quasi-universal'' relations between key observables, such as the compactness, dimensionless static tidal deformability, and moment of inertia, play a crucial role in connecting different measurable observables while minimizing uncertainties due to the yet unknown equation-of-state. In this work, we identify new quasi-universal relations between the static, dimensionless tidal deformability ($\Lambda^{(0)}$) and its leading-order dynamical correction ($\Lambda^{(2)}$), as well as between $\Lambda^{(0)}$ and a combination of these parameters ($\sqrt{ \Lambda^{(0)}/\Lambda^{(2)}}\equiv M\omega_*$), obtained from the small-frequency expansion of the relativistic tidal response. We test these relations across a representative set of 59 equations of state, finding that the equation-of-state dependence does not exceed $\sim$5\% for the $\Lambda^{(0)}$--$\Lambda^{(2)}$ relation and $\sim2.8\%$ for the $\Lambda^{(0)}$--$M\omega_*$ relation. This indicates a high degree of universality and offers a simplified framework for incorporating dynamical tidal effects into gravitational-wave modeling. Furthermore, we compare the dynamical tidal response against different recent strategies (a Taylor expansion and a one-mode approximation) to model the dynamical tide. We find that both models are capable of capturing the frequency-dependent behavior of the dynamical tidal deformability, with the one-mode approximation agreeing better with the dynamical response than the Taylor expansion in most of the parameter space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript identifies quasi-universal relations between the static dimensionless tidal deformability Λ⁰ and its leading dynamical correction Λ², as well as between Λ⁰ and √(Λ⁰/Λ²) ≡ Mω*, based on the small-frequency expansion of the relativistic tidal response. These relations are tested on a set of 59 equations of state, with the equation-of-state dependence reported to be at most ∼5% for the Λ⁰–Λ² relation and ∼2.8% for the Λ⁰–Mω* relation. The work further compares the dynamical tidal response to a Taylor expansion and a one-mode approximation for modeling purposes.

Significance. If validated, these relations offer a practical way to include dynamical tidal effects in gravitational-wave waveform models while minimizing equation-of-state uncertainties. The survey across 59 EOS provides substantial numerical evidence for the claimed level of universality. The comparisons to alternative modeling strategies (Taylor expansion and one-mode approximation) are a positive aspect, demonstrating that the one-mode approximation performs better in most cases. This could aid in more accurate modeling of binary neutron star inspirals.

major comments (1)
  1. [section on comparison to modeling strategies] The applicability to gravitational-wave modeling hinges on the accuracy of the small-frequency expansion truncated after the Λ² term at finite orbital frequencies typical of late inspiral (hundreds of Hz). Although the manuscript compares the dynamical response to the Taylor expansion, it does not explicitly quantify the truncation error or demonstrate that the reported universality remains intact when higher-order frequency terms are included at relevant frequencies. This is a load-bearing issue for the central claim's utility in GW applications. (See the section on comparison to modeling strategies.)
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'a representative set of 59 equations of state' but could briefly note the range of masses or compactness covered to give context.
  2. [Figure captions] Some figure captions lack sufficient detail on what the different curves or points represent, making it harder to interpret the universality plots without referring to the main text.
  3. [Notation] The notation for the dynamical correction as Λ^{(2)} is clear, but ensuring consistent use of superscripts throughout the manuscript would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to better support the applicability claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The applicability to gravitational-wave modeling hinges on the accuracy of the small-frequency expansion truncated after the Λ² term at finite orbital frequencies typical of late inspiral (hundreds of Hz). Although the manuscript compares the dynamical response to the Taylor expansion, it does not explicitly quantify the truncation error or demonstrate that the reported universality remains intact when higher-order frequency terms are included at relevant frequencies. This is a load-bearing issue for the central claim's utility in GW applications. (See the section on comparison to modeling strategies.)

    Authors: We agree that a direct quantification of the truncation error at finite frequencies (hundreds of Hz) is necessary to substantiate the utility for GW modeling. The manuscript does compare the full dynamical tidal response to the Taylor expansion (i.e., the small-frequency expansion truncated after the Λ² term) and to the one-mode approximation across the EOS sample, finding that the one-mode approximation matches the dynamical response more closely in most cases. However, we did not explicitly report the relative truncation error at specific late-inspiral frequencies nor test whether the reported universality of the Λ⁰–Λ² and Λ⁰–Mω* relations persists once higher-order frequency terms are restored. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph and accompanying figure that (i) evaluates the truncation error of the Λ² term for representative EOS at orbital frequencies up to 500 Hz and (ii) discusses the regime in which the leading-order universality remains a useful approximation even when higher-order contributions are present. This addition will directly address the load-bearing concern for GW applications. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Numerical survey of EOS yields quasi-universal relations with no reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper computes the static tidal deformability Λ⁰ and its leading dynamical correction Λ² from the small-frequency expansion of the relativistic tidal response for each of 59 equations of state, then reports the observed correlations (with maximum EOS scatter of ~5% and ~2.8%). This is an empirical measurement of limited EOS dependence across independent numerical solutions, not a closed-form derivation or fit that forces the reported relations by construction. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain; the universality is a discovered property of the computed quantities rather than an analytic tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the small-frequency expansion of the tidal response and on the assumption that the selected 59 equations of state adequately sample the space of realistic nuclear models. No new particles or forces are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math General relativity governs the spacetime and the tidal response is computed within the relativistic perturbation framework.
    Invoked throughout the description of the tidal response calculation.
  • domain assumption The small-frequency expansion of the dynamical tidal response is an accurate approximation in the relevant inspiral regime.
    Required for the definition of Λ² and Mω*.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5620 in / 1337 out tokens · 21405 ms · 2026-05-17T05:49:31.155160+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Good, the Bad, and the Subtle: Relativistic mode sums for neutron-star tidal response

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A practical relativistic mode-sum method for neutron-star tidal response is implemented, with robust f-mode agreement to direct matching but acknowledged limitations in convergence and tidal field uniqueness.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 27 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    How do the low-frequency expansion of [36] and the EOB mode-sum [34] compare to the dynamical ap- proach of [41]? In particular, over what frequency and compactness range do these approximations remain re- liable, and where do they begin to deviate from the dy- namical calculation?

    work page

  2. [2]

    What quasi-universal relations exist among the coeffi- cients appearing in the low-frequency expansion of the dynamical tidal response function, and to what extent are these relations insensitive to the NS EOS? To perform the comparison, we adopt two different approx- imations to the dynamical tidal response. First, we use the approach of [36] and conside...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Neutron star equation of state via gravitational wave observations

    C. Markakis, J. S. Read, M. Shibata, K. Uryu, J. D. E. Creighton, J. L. Friedman, and B. D. Lackey, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.189, 012024 (2009), arXiv:1110.3759 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    M. C. Miller, C. Chirenti, and F. K. Lamb, The Astrophysical Journal (2019), 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4ef9, arXiv:1904.08907 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4ef9 2019

  5. [5]

    Neutron stars as extreme gravity probes,

    H. O. Silva, “Neutron stars as extreme gravity probes,” in Recent Progress on Gravity Tests: Challenges and Future Perspectives, edited by C. Bambi and A. C ´ardenas-Avenda˜no (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2024) pp. 101–147

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    J. S. Read, C. Markakis, M. Shibata, K. Uryu, J. D. E. Creighton, and J. L. Friedman, Phys. Rev. D79, 124033 (2009), arXiv:0901.3258 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    M. C. Milleret al., Astrophys. J. Lett.887, L24 (2019), arXiv:1912.05705 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    M. C. Milleret al., Astrophys. J. Lett.918, L28 (2021), arXiv:2105.06979 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    Krameret al., Science314, 97 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0609417

    M. Krameret al., Science314, 97 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0609417

    work page arXiv 2006

  12. [12]

    J. M. Weisberg, D. J. Nice, and J. H. Taylor, Astrophys. J.722, 1030 (2010), arXiv:1011.0718 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  13. [13]

    A Comprehensive Study of Relativistic Gravity using PSR B1534+12

    E. Fonseca, I. H. Stairs, and S. E. Thorsett, Astrophys. J.787, 82 (2014), arXiv:1402.4836 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    E. E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, Phys. Rev. D77, 021502 (2008), arXiv:0709.1915 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  15. [15]

    Tidal deformability of neutron stars with realistic equations of state and their gravitational wave signatures in binary inspiral

    T. Hinderer, B. D. Lackey, R. N. Lang, and J. S. Read, Phys. Rev. D81, 123016 (2010), arXiv:0911.3535 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    Guerra Chaves and T

    A. Guerra Chaves and T. Hinderer, J. Phys. G46, 123002 (2019), arXiv:1912.01461 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Observing and measuring the neutron-star equation-of-state in spinning binary neutron star systems

    I. Harry and T. Hinderer, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 145010 (2018), arXiv:1801.09972 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Resonant Oscillations and Tidal Heating in Coalescing Binary Neutron Stars

    D. Lai, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.270, 611 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9404062

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  19. [19]

    Reisenegger and P

    A. Reisenegger and P. Goldreich, Astrophys. J.426, 688 (1994)

    work page 1994

  20. [20]

    K. D. Kokkotas and G. Schaefer, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 275, 301 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9502034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  21. [21]

    W. C. G. Ho and D. Lai, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.308, 153 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9812116

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  22. [22]

    L. S. Finn, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.227, 265 (1987)

    work page 1987

  23. [23]

    H.-J. Kuan, A. G. Suvorov, and K. D. Kokkotas, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.506, 2985 (2021), arXiv:2106.16123 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    H.-J. Kuan, A. G. Suvorov, and K. D. Kokkotas, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.508, 1732 (2021), arXiv:2107.00533 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    H.-J. Kuan, C. J. Kr ¨uger, A. G. Suvorov, and K. D. Kokkotas, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.513, 4045 (2022), arXiv:2204.08492 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Yu and N

    H. Yu and N. N. Weinberg, Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society464, 2622–2637 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    H. Yu, P. Arras, and N. N. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D110, 024039 (2024), arXiv:2404.00147 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Gao, H.-J

    Y . Gao, H.-J. Kuan, C.-J. Xia, H. O. Silva, and M. Shibata, (2025), arXiv:2509.00257 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    K. J. Kwon, H. Yu, and T. Venumadhav, (2025), arXiv:2503.11837 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    K. J. Kwon, H. Yu, and T. Venumadhav, (2024), arXiv:2410.03831 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    H. Yu, N. N. Weinberg, P. Arras, J. Kwon, and T. Venu- madhav, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.519, 4325 (2023), arXiv:2211.07002 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars

    T. Hinderer, Astrophys. J.677, 1216 (2008), [Erratum: Astro- phys.J. 697, 964 (2009)], arXiv:0711.2420 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  33. [33]

    Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers

    T. Binnington and E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D80, 084018 (2009), arXiv:0906.1366 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  34. [34]

    Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars

    T. Damour and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D80, 084035 (2009), arXiv:0906.0096 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  35. [35]

    Effects of neutron-star dynamic tides on gravitational waveforms within the effective-one-body approach

    T. Hindereret al., Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 181101 (2016), arXiv:1602.00599 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [36]

    Dynamical Tides in General Relativity: Effective Action and Effective-One-Body Hamiltonian

    J. Steinhoff, T. Hinderer, A. Buonanno, and A. Taracchini, Phys. Rev. D94, 104028 (2016), arXiv:1608.01907 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Poisson, (2020), arXiv:2012.10184 [gr-qc]

    E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D103, 064023 (2021), arXiv:2012.10184 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Pitre and E

    T. Pitre and E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D109, 064004 (2024), arXiv:2311.04075 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Impact of nonlinearities on relativistic dynamical tides in compact binary inspirals,

    T. Pitre and E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D112, 084017 (2025), arXiv:2506.08722 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Relativistic and Dynamical Love,

    A. Hegade K. R., K. J. Kwon, T. Venumadhav, H. Yu, and N. Yunes, (2025), arXiv:2507.10693 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Andersson, R

    N. Andersson, R. Counsell, F. Gittins, and S. Ghosh, (2025), arXiv:2511.05139 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Z. Miao, X. Feng, Z. Pan, and H. Yang, (2025), arXiv:2506.23176 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Dynamical tidal response of nonrotating relativistic stars,

    A. Hegade K. R., J. L. Ripley, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D109, 104064 (2024), arXiv:2403.03254 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    A. Abac, T. Dietrich, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, and M. Ujevic, Physical Review D109(2024), 10.1103/physrevd.109.024062

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.024062 2024

  45. [45]

    I-Love-Q Relations in Neutron Stars and their Applications to Astrophysics, Gravitational Waves and Fundamental Physics

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D88, 023009 (2013), arXiv:1303.1528 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  46. [46]

    Binary Love Relations

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 13LT01 (2016), arXiv:1512.02639 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  47. [47]

    Approximate Universal Relations among Tidal Parameters for Neutron Star Binaries

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 015006 (2017), arXiv:1608.06187 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    T. K. Chan, Y . H. Sham, P. T. Leung, and L. M. Lin, Phys. Rev. D90, 124023 (2014), arXiv:1408.3789 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [49]

    Zhao and J

    T. Zhao and J. M. Lattimer, Phys. Rev. D106, 123002 (2022), arXiv:2204.03037 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    J. S. Read, B. D. Lackey, B. J. Owen, and J. L. Friedman, Phys. Rev. D79, 124032 (2009), arXiv:0812.2163 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [51]

    H. Tan, T. Dore, V . Dexheimer, J. Noronha-Hostler, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D105, 023018 (2022), arXiv:2106.03890 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    S. Ma, H. Yu, and Y . Chen, Phys. Rev. D101, 123020 (2020), arXiv:2003.02373 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  53. [53]

    Yu and S

    H. Yu and S. Y . Lau, Phys. Rev. D111, 084029 (2025), arXiv:2501.13064 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Counsell, F

    R. Counsell, F. Gittins, N. Andersson, and P. Pnigouras, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.536, 1967 (2024), arXiv:2409.20178 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 1967

  55. [55]

    Reboul-Salze, A

    A. Reboul-Salze, A. Astoul, H.-J. Kuan, and A. G. Suvorov, (2025), arXiv:2503.24154 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    A. R. Counsell, F. Gittins, N. Andersson, and I. Tews, Phys. Rev. Lett. , (2025), arXiv:2504.06181 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Kuan and K

    H.-J. Kuan and K. D. Kokkotas, Phys. Rev. D106, 064052 (2022), arXiv:2205.01705 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Measuring the neutron star tidal deformability with equation-of-state-independent relations and gravitational waves

    K. Chatziioannou, C.-J. Haster, and A. Zimmerman, Phys. Rev. D97, 104036 (2018), arXiv:1804.03221 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Chern-Simons Modification of General Relativity

    R. Jackiw and S. Y . Pi, Phys. Rev. D68, 104012 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0308071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  60. [60]

    Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity

    S. Alexander and N. Yunes, Phys. Rept.480, 1 (2009), arXiv:0907.2562 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  61. [61]

    H. O. Silva, A. M. Holgado, A. C ´ardenas-Avenda˜no, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 181101 (2021), arXiv:2004.01253 [gr-qc]. 11 Appendix A: Coefficients of Small Frequency Master Equations Here, we explicitly present the coefficients of the small- frequency master equations. These expressions depend on the radial coordinater, the equilibrium fluid var...

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Instead, the integration is initiated at a small but finite radial coordinater=r 0

    Near the center Due to the singular behavior of the equations near the ori- gin, direct numerical integration fromr=0 is not feasible. Instead, the integration is initiated at a small but finite radial coordinater=r 0. To provide consistent initial conditions atr=r 0, we perform a power series expansion of the rele- vant functions about the origin. This e...

    work page

  63. [63]

    Near the surface As the radial coordinate approaches the stellar radiusr=R, the pressurep(r) drops to zero, defining the boundary of the star. Near this surface, the structure of the background solu- tion remains smooth, but care must be taken in handling the vanishing pressure, particularly when evaluating terms that in- volvep(r) or the speed of soundc ...

    work page

  64. [64]

    Since 13 the fluid perturbation functions go to zero outside the star, we don’t consider their behavior in the exterior region

    Exterior Solutions The exterior solutions for the perturbation functions are de- rived by solving the master equations outside the star. Since 13 the fluid perturbation functions go to zero outside the star, we don’t consider their behavior in the exterior region. The methodology we employ to obtain the exterior behavior of our specific choice of metric p...

    work page 2016