pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13169 · v2 · pith:GC36BX3Mnew · submitted 2026-05-13 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

PanoWorld: Towards Spatial Supersensing in 360^circ Panorama World

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 16:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords panoramic sensingspatial understandingmultimodal LLMsequirectangular panoramasspherical geometryvisual navigation3D reasoning360 degree world
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:GC36BX3M Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{GC36BX3M}

Prints a linked pith:GC36BX3M badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

PanoWorld enables direct pano-native spatial reasoning in MLLMs by treating equirectangular panoramas as continuous spherical spaces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper seeks to establish that multimodal large language models can achieve spatial supersensing by reasoning natively over 360-degree panoramas in equirectangular projection format. It defines core pano-native abilities such as semantic anchoring, spherical localization, reference-frame transformation, and depth-aware 3D spatial reasoning. A pipeline is built to generate geometry-aware, language-grounded, and depth-aware supervision from mixed-source panoramas for instruction tuning. The PanoWorld model incorporates Spherical Spatial Cross-Attention to embed spherical geometry, resulting in better performance than baselines on spatial reasoning benchmarks. If correct, this would mean AI systems could better understand and navigate full surrounding environments without relying on limited field-of-view images.

Core claim

PanoWorld is a method for pano-native understanding where an MLLM reasons over an ERP panorama as a continuous, observer-centered space. Key abilities are defined and instantiated via a large-scale metadata construction pipeline that converts mixed-source ERP panoramas into geometry-aware, language-grounded, and depth-aware supervision signals. The model uses Spherical Spatial Cross-Attention to inject spherical geometry into the visual stream, and experiments show it substantially outperforms proprietary and open-source baselines on PanoSpace-Bench, H* Bench, and R2R-CE Val-Unseen benchmarks.

What carries the argument

The Spherical Spatial Cross-Attention that injects spherical geometry into the visual stream, enabling the model to handle the spherical structure of ERP panoramas for pano-native spatial reasoning.

If this is right

  • Pano-native supervision allows MLLMs to perform semantic anchoring and spherical localization on full panoramas.
  • Depth-aware 3D spatial reasoning becomes feasible in a single forward pass over the ERP image.
  • Outperformance is observed on diagnostic benchmarks like PanoSpace-Bench and navigation tasks like R2R-CE Val-Unseen.
  • The approach supports scalable training using mixed-source ERP panoramas.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Robotic applications could benefit from more efficient full-surround perception using this native panorama processing.
  • The defined pano-native abilities might generalize to other immersive imaging formats beyond standard ERP.
  • Creating similar benchmarks for other spatial tasks could accelerate progress in panoramic AI.
  • Integrating this with video data could extend the supersensing to dynamic environments.

Load-bearing premise

The geometry-aware and depth-aware supervision signals accurately capture continuous observer-centered spatial relationships without artifacts from the equirectangular projection.

What would settle it

Evaluating PanoWorld on a held-out set of real captured 360-degree images with precise 3D ground truth annotations and measuring whether spatial localization accuracy matches the reported gains or reveals projection-related errors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13169 by Changpeng Wang, Donglian Qi, Junhan Liu, Xi Chen, Xin Lin, Yuheng Liu, Yunfeng Yan, Zhen Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Existing MLLMs reason over fragmented local views, making it difficult to associate spatial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Verifiable metadata construction pipeline. We collect mixed-source ERP panoramas, per [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The architecture of PanoWorld. After patch embedding, visual tokens [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Case comparison on H∗Bench. Perspective-view iterative search is inefficient and may fail due to fragmented local observa￾tions, whereas direct ERP input enables holistic reasoning and correct prediction in one step [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Object category distribution in the constructed metadata. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Object category distribution in the constructed metadata. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Instruction format distribution in the generated training data. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Instruction format distribution in the generated training data. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Case studies of pano-native spatial reasoning. The first two examples show downstream human-centric visual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Case studies of pano-native spatial reasoning. The first two examples show downstream human-centric visual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Multimodal large laboratory models (MLLMs) still struggle with spatial understanding under the dominant perspective-image paradigm, which inherits the narrow field of view of human-like perception. For navigation, robotic search, and 3D scene understanding, 360-degree panoramic sensing offers a form of supersensing by capturing the entire surrounding environment at once. However, existing MLLM pipelines typically decompose panoramas into multiple perspective views, leaving the spherical structure of equirectangular projection (ERP) largely implicit. In this paper, we study pano-native understanding, which requires an MLLM to reason over an ERP panorama as a continuous, observer-centered space. To this end, we first define the key abilities for pano-native understanding, including semantic anchoring, spherical localization, reference-frame transformation, and depth-aware 3D spatial reasoning. We then build a large-scale metadata construction pipeline that converts mixed-source ERP panoramas into geometry-aware, language-grounded, and depth-aware supervision, and instantiate these signals as capability-aligned instruction tuning data. On the model side, we introduce PanoWorld with Spherical Spatial Cross-Attention, which injects spherical geometry into the visual stream. We further construct PanoSpace-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating ERP-native spatial reasoning. Experiments show that PanoWorld substantially outperforms both proprietary and open-source baselines on PanoSpace-Bench, H* Bench, and R2R-CE Val-Unseen benchmarks. These results demonstrate that robust panoramic reasoning requires dedicated pano-native supervision and geometry-aware model adaptation. All source code and proposed data will be publicly released.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents PanoWorld, a multimodal large language model for pano-native understanding in 360-degree equirectangular projection (ERP) panoramas. It defines key abilities such as semantic anchoring, spherical localization, reference-frame transformation, and depth-aware 3D spatial reasoning. A large-scale metadata construction pipeline is built to generate geometry-aware, language-grounded, and depth-aware supervision from mixed-source ERP panoramas, which is used for instruction tuning. The model uses Spherical Spatial Cross-Attention to incorporate spherical geometry into the visual stream. A new diagnostic benchmark PanoSpace-Bench is introduced, and the model is shown to outperform proprietary and open-source baselines on PanoSpace-Bench, H* Bench, and R2R-CE Val-Unseen.

Significance. This work addresses a significant gap in spatial reasoning for panoramic images, which is crucial for applications like navigation and robotic search. By focusing on pano-native methods rather than decomposing into perspective views, it could lead to more robust 3D scene understanding models. The public release of code and data would enhance reproducibility and further research in the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2 (metadata construction pipeline): the claim that mixed-source ERP panoramas are converted into accurate, continuous observer-centered supervision signals (semantic anchoring, spherical localization, depth-aware 3D reasoning) lacks any description of explicit spherical correction for equirectangular distortion. Standard perspective-derived depth or label transfer without distortion-aware sampling or spherical harmonics would embed pole-compression artifacts, making the reported gains on PanoSpace-Bench potentially attributable to data scale rather than true pano-native geometry injection.
  2. [§5.3] §5.3 and Table 2 (main results): the outperformance on PanoSpace-Bench, H* Bench, and R2R-CE Val-Unseen is presented as evidence that dedicated pano-native supervision is necessary, yet no ablation isolates the Spherical Spatial Cross-Attention module from the instruction data volume or base model capacity. Without this, the central claim that geometry-aware adaptation (rather than scale) drives the gains remains unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] The notation for reference-frame transformation in §2 could be formalized with explicit coordinate mappings to improve clarity.
  2. [Figure 4] Figure 4 (attention visualization) would benefit from quantitative metrics on attention distribution across spherical latitudes to demonstrate reduced pole bias.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications on our methodology and experiments while indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (metadata construction pipeline): the claim that mixed-source ERP panoramas are converted into accurate, continuous observer-centered supervision signals (semantic anchoring, spherical localization, depth-aware 3D reasoning) lacks any description of explicit spherical correction for equirectangular distortion. Standard perspective-derived depth or label transfer without distortion-aware sampling or spherical harmonics would embed pole-compression artifacts, making the reported gains on PanoSpace-Bench potentially attributable to data scale rather than true pano-native geometry injection.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation regarding the need for explicit detail. Our metadata construction pipeline does incorporate distortion-aware processing when generating geometry-aware and depth-aware supervision from ERP sources, including spherical surface projection and interpolation to preserve continuity. However, we acknowledge that §3.2 would benefit from a more explicit description of these steps. In the revised manuscript we will expand this section to detail the equirectangular distortion correction, including distortion-compensated sampling and spherical interpolation methods used for label and depth transfer. This will make clear that the supervision avoids pole-compression artifacts and supports true pano-native geometry rather than relying solely on data scale. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.3] §5.3 and Table 2 (main results): the outperformance on PanoSpace-Bench, H* Bench, and R2R-CE Val-Unseen is presented as evidence that dedicated pano-native supervision is necessary, yet no ablation isolates the Spherical Spatial Cross-Attention module from the instruction data volume or base model capacity. Without this, the central claim that geometry-aware adaptation (rather than scale) drives the gains remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit ablation isolating the Spherical Spatial Cross-Attention module would strengthen verification of our central claim. While our experiments compare PanoWorld against baselines that differ in both architecture and training data, we did not include a controlled ablation holding data volume and base model fixed. In the revised version we will add such an ablation study in §5.3, training variants with and without the Spherical Spatial Cross-Attention module on identical instruction data and base capacity. This will directly demonstrate the contribution of the geometry-aware adaptation to the observed gains on PanoSpace-Bench and other benchmarks. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation chain is self-contained

full rationale

The paper defines pano-native abilities (semantic anchoring, spherical localization, reference-frame transformation, depth-aware 3D reasoning), describes a metadata construction pipeline that converts mixed-source ERP panoramas into geometry-aware and depth-aware supervision signals, introduces Spherical Spatial Cross-Attention in PanoWorld, builds PanoSpace-Bench, and reports experimental outperformance on multiple benchmarks. No equations, self-citations, or steps in the abstract reduce any claimed result to a fitted parameter or prior self-result by construction. The supervision pipeline and model adaptation are presented as independent engineering contributions whose validity is tested externally via benchmark comparisons rather than tautologically assumed. This is the normal case of a non-circular empirical paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides insufficient detail to enumerate specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work appears to build on standard MLLM training assumptions while adding new components whose internal structure is not specified here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5844 in / 1067 out tokens · 39894 ms · 2026-05-19T16:51:51.861702+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Qwen3-VL Technical Report

    Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai, Ruizhe Chen, Keqin Chen, Xionghui Chen, Zesen Cheng, Lianghao Deng, et al. Qwen3-vl technical report, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21631

  2. [2]

    Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report

    Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, et al. Qwen2.5-vl technical report, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13923

  3. [3]

    Panda: Towards panoramic depth anything with unlabeled panoramas and mobius spatial augmentation

    Zidong Cao, Jinjing Zhu, Weiming Zhang, Hao Ai, Haotian Bai, Hengshuang Zhao, and Lin Wang. Panda: Towards panoramic depth anything with unlabeled panoramas and mobius spatial augmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 982–992, 2025

  4. [4]

    SpatialVLM: Endowing vision-language models with spatial reasoning capabilities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12168, 2024

    Boyang Chen, Ruijie Xu, Xinyu Zhang, et al. SpatialVLM: Endowing vision-language models with spatial reasoning capabilities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12168, 2024

  5. [5]

    360+x: A panoptic multi-modal scene understanding dataset

    Hao Chen, Yuqi Hou, Chenyuan Qu, Irene Testini, Xiaohan Hong, and Jianbo Jiao. 360+x: A panoptic multi-modal scene understanding dataset. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024

  6. [6]

    Spatialrgpt: Grounded spatial reasoning in vision-language models

    An-Chieh Cheng, Hongxu Yin, Yang Fu, Qiushan Guo, Ruihan Yang, Jan Kautz, Xiaolong Wang, and Sifei Liu. Spatialrgpt: Grounded spatial reasoning in vision-language models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

  7. [7]

    Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities

    Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber, Mike Schaekermann, Ice Pasupat, Noveen Sachdeva, et al. Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06261

  8. [8]

    Spherenet: Learning spher- ical representations for detection and classification in omnidirectional images

    Benjamin Coors, Alexandru Paul Condurache, and Andreas Geiger. Spherenet: Learning spher- ical representations for detection and classification in omnidirectional images. InProceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 518–533, 2018

  9. [9]

    Lau-net: Latitude adaptive upscaling network for omnidirectional image super-resolution

    Xin Deng, Hao Wang, Mai Xu, Yichen Guo, Yuhang Song, and Li Yang. Lau-net: Latitude adaptive upscaling network for omnidirectional image super-resolution. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9189–9198, 2021

  10. [10]

    Are multimodal large language models ready for omnidirectional spatial reasoning?, 2025

    Zihao Dongfang, Xu Zheng, Ziqiao Weng, Yuanhuiyi Lyu, Danda Pani Paudel, Luc Van Gool, Kailun Yang, and Xuming Hu. Are multimodal large language models ready for omnidirectional spatial reasoning?, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11907

  11. [11]

    More than the Sum: Panorama-Language Models for Adverse Omni-Scenes

    Weijia Fan, Ruiping Liu, Jiale Wei, Yufan Chen, Junwei Zheng, Zichao Zeng, Jiaming Zhang, Qiufu Li, Linlin Shen, and Rainer Stiefelhagen. More than the sum: Panorama-language models for adverse omni-scenes.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.09573, 2026

  12. [12]

    Dit360: High-fidelity panoramic image generation via hybrid training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11712, 2025

    Haoran Feng, Dizhe Zhang, Xiangtai Li, Bo Du, and Lu Qi. Dit360: High-fidelity panoramic image generation via hybrid training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11712, 2025

  13. [13]

    Wedetect: Fast open-vocabulary object detection as retrieval.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.12309, 2025

    Shenghao Fu, Yukun Su, Fengyun Rao, Jing Lyu, Xiaohua Xie, and Wei-Shi Zheng. Wedetect: Fast open-vocabulary object detection as retrieval.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.12309, 2025

  14. [14]

    Airsim360: A panoramic simulation platform within drone view.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02009, 2025

    Xian Ge, Yuling Pan, Yuhang Zhang, Xiang Li, Weijun Zhang, Dizhe Zhang, Zhaoliang Wan, Xin Lin, Xiangkai Zhang, Juntao Liang, et al. Airsim360: A panoramic simulation platform within drone view.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02009, 2025

  15. [15]

    Panovggt: Feed-forward 3d reconstruction from panoramic imagery, 2026

    Yijing Guo, Mengjun Chao, Luo Wang, Tianyang Zhao, Haizhao Dai, Yingliang Zhang, Jingyi Yu, and Yujiao Shi. Panovggt: Feed-forward 3d reconstruction from panoramic imagery, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17571

  16. [16]

    3d-llm: Injecting the 3d world into large language models

    Yining Hong, Haoyu Zhen, Peihao Chen, Shuhong Zheng, Yilun Du, Zhenfang Chen, and Chuang Gan. 3d-llm: Injecting the 3d world into large language models. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023

  17. [17]

    An embodied generalist agent in 3d world

    Jiangyong Huang, Silong Yong, Xiaojian Ma, Xiongkun Linghu, Puhao Li, Yan Wang, Qing Li, Song-Chun Zhu, Baoxiong Jia, and Siyuan Huang. An embodied generalist agent in 3d world. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2024. 11

  18. [18]

    GPT-4o System Card

    Aaron Hurst, Adam Lerer, Adam P. Goucher, Adam Perelman, Aditya Ramesh, Aidan Clark, Aaron Ostrow, Alethea Welihinda, Alan Hayes, Alec Radford, et al. Gpt-4o system card.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276, 2024

  19. [19]

    Sim-2-sim transfer for vision-and-language navigation in continu- ous environments

    Jacob Krantz and Stefan Lee. Sim-2-sim transfer for vision-and-language navigation in continu- ous environments. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022

  20. [20]

    Beyond the nav- graph: Vision-and-language navigation in continuous environments

    Jacob Krantz, Erik Wijmans, Arjun Majumdar, Dhruv Batra, and Stefan Lee. Beyond the nav- graph: Vision-and-language navigation in continuous environments. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 104–120. Springer, 2020

  21. [21]

    Waypoint models for instruction-guided navigation in continuous environments

    Jacob Krantz, Aaron Gokaslan, Dhruv Batra, Stefan Lee, and Oleksandr Maksymets. Waypoint models for instruction-guided navigation in continuous environments. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021

  22. [22]

    Da 2: Depth anything in any direction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.26618, 2025

    Haodong Li, Wangguangdong Zheng, Jing He, Yuhao Liu, Xin Lin, Xin Yang, Ying-Cong Chen, and Chunchao Guo. Da 2: Depth anything in any direction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.26618, 2025

  23. [23]

    Realsee3d: A large-scale multi-view rgb-d dataset of indoor scenes (version 1.0), 2025

    Linyuan Li, Yan Wu, Xi Li, Lingli Wang, Tong Rao, Jie Zhou, Cihui Pan, and Xinchen Hui. Realsee3d: A large-scale multi-view rgb-d dataset of indoor scenes (version 1.0), 2025. URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17826243

  24. [24]

    One flight over the gap: A survey from perspective to panoramic vision.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.04444, 2025

    Xin Lin, Xian Ge, Dizhe Zhang, Zhaoliang Wan, Xianshun Wang, Xiangtai Li, Wenjie Jiang, Bo Du, Dacheng Tao, Ming-Hsuan Yang, et al. One flight over the gap: A survey from perspective to panoramic vision.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.04444, 2025

  25. [25]

    Depth any panoramas: A foundation model for panoramic depth estimation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16913, 2025

    Xin Lin, Meixi Song, Dizhe Zhang, Wenxuan Lu, Haodong Li, Bo Du, Ming-Hsuan Yang, Truong Nguyen, and Lu Qi. Depth any panoramas: A foundation model for panoramic depth estimation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16913, 2025

  26. [26]

    PanoEnv: Exploring 3d spatial intelligence in panoramic environments with reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.21992, 2026

    Zekai Lin and Xu Zheng. PanoEnv: Exploring 3d spatial intelligence in panoramic environments with reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.21992, 2026

  27. [27]

    Panoswin: A pano-style swin transformer for panorama understanding

    Zhixin Ling, Zhen Xing, Xiangdong Zhou, Manliang Cao, and Guichun Zhou. Panoswin: A pano-style swin transformer for panorama understanding. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023

  28. [28]

    Ministral 3

    Alexander H. Liu, Kartik Khandelwal, Sandeep Subramanian, Victor Jouault, Abhinav Rastogi, Adrien Sadé, et al. Ministral 3, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08584

  29. [29]

    Spatial reasoning in multimodal large language models: A survey of tasks, benchmarks and methods

    Weichen Liu, Qiyao Xue, Haoming Wang, Xiangyu Yin, Boyuan Yang, and Wei Gao. Spatial reasoning in multimodal large language models: A survey of tasks, benchmarks and methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.15722, 2025

  30. [30]

    Omniroam: World wandering via long- horizon panoramic video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.30045, 2026

    Yuheng Liu, Xin Lin, Xinke Li, Baihan Yang, Chen Wang, Kalyan Sunkavalli, Yannick Hold- Geoffroy, Hao Tan, Kai Zhang, Xiaohui Xie, et al. Omniroam: World wandering via long- horizon panoramic video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.30045, 2026

  31. [31]

    Sqa3d: Situated question answering in 3d scenes

    Xiaojian Ma, Silong Yong, Zilong Zheng, Qing Li, Yitao Liang, Song-Chun Zhu, and Siyuan Huang. Sqa3d: Situated question answering in 3d scenes. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

  32. [32]

    Openeqa: Embodied question answering in the era of foundation models

    Arjun Majumdar, Anurag Ajay, Xiaohan Zhang, Pranav Putta, Sriram Yenamandra, Mikael Henaff, Sneha Silwal, Paul Mcvay, Oleksandr Maksymets, Sergio Arnaud, Karmesh Yadav, Qiyang Li, Ben Newman, Mohit Sharma, Vincent Berges, Shiqi Zhang, Pulkit Agrawal, Yonatan Bisk, Dhruv Batra, Mrinal Kalakrishnan, Franziska Meier, Chris Paxton, Alexander Sax, and Aravind ...

  33. [33]

    Panoformer: Panorama transformer for indoor 360◦ depth estimation

    Zhijie Shen, Chunyu Lin, Kang Liao, Lang Nie, Zishuo Zheng, and Yao Zhao. Panoformer: Panorama transformer for indoor 360◦ depth estimation. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022. 12

  34. [34]

    Tsaftaris

    Ilias Stogiannidis, Steven McDonagh, and Sotirios A. Tsaftaris. Mind the gap: Benchmarking spatial reasoning in vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19707, 2025

  35. [35]

    Qwen3.5: Accelerating productivity with native multimodal agents, February

    Qwen Team. Qwen3.5: Accelerating productivity with native multimodal agents, February

  36. [36]

    URLhttps://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.5

  37. [37]

    Cambrian-1: A fully open, vision-centric exploration of multimodal llms

    Shengbang Tong, Ellis Brown, Penghao Wu, Sanghyun Woo, Manoj Middepogu, Sai Charitha Akula, Jihan Yang, Shusheng Yang, Adithya Iyer, Xichen Pan, Ziteng Wang, Rob Fergus, Yann LeCun, and Saining Xie. Cambrian-1: A fully open, vision-centric exploration of multimodal llms. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

  38. [38]

    From illusion to intention: Visual rationale learning for vision-language reasoning, 2025

    Changpeng Wang, Haozhe Wang, Xi Chen, Junhan Liu, Taofeng Xue, Chong Peng, Donglian Qi, Fangzhen Lin, and Yunfeng Yan. From illusion to intention: Visual rationale learning for vision-language reasoning, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2511.23031

  39. [39]

    Dreamwalker: Mental planning for continuous vision-language navigation

    Hanqing Wang, Wenguan Wang, Tianmin Shu, Wei Liang, and Jianbing Shen. Dreamwalker: Mental planning for continuous vision-language navigation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023

  40. [40]

    VL-Rethinker: Incentivizing Self-Reflection of Vision-Language Models with Reinforcement Learning

    Haozhe Wang, Chao Qu, Zuming Huang, Wei Chu, Fangzhen Lin, and Wenhu Chen. Vl- rethinker: Incentivizing self-reflection of vision-language models with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08837, 2025

  41. [41]

    Pixel Reasoner: Incentivizing Pixel-Space Reasoning with Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning

    Haozhe Wang, Alex Su, , Weiming Ren, Fangzhen Lin, and Wenhu Chen. Pixel reasoner: Incentivizing pixel-space reasoning with curiosity-driven reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15966, 2025

  42. [42]

    RationalRewards: Reasoning Rewards Scale Visual Generation Both Training and Test Time

    Haozhe Wang, Cong Wei, Weiming Ren, Jiaming Liu, Fangzhen Lin, and Wenhu Chen. Ra- tionalrewards: Reasoning rewards scale visual generation both training and test time.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.11626, 2026

  43. [43]

    Ning-Hsu Wang and Yu-Lun Liu. Depth anywhere: Enhancing 360 monocular depth estimation via perspective distillation and unlabeled data augmentation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:127739–127764, 2024

  44. [44]

    InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency

    Weiyun Wang, Zhangwei Gao, Lixin Gu, Hengjun Pu, Long Cui, Xingguang Wei, Zhaoyang Liu, Linglin Jing, Shenglong Ye, Jie Shao, Zhaokai Wang, et al. Internvl3.5: Advancing open-source multimodal models in versatility, reasoning, and efficiency, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2508.18265

  45. [45]

    Gridmm: Grid memory map for vision-and-language navigation

    Zihan Wang, Xiangyang Li, Jiahao Yang, Yeqi Liu, and Shuqiang Jiang. Gridmm: Grid memory map for vision-and-language navigation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023

  46. [46]

    Dynam3d: Dynamic layered 3d tokens empower vlm for vision-and-language navigation

    Zihan Wang, Seungjun Lee, and Gim Hee Lee. Dynam3d: Dynamic layered 3d tokens empower vlm for vision-and-language navigation. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2025

  47. [47]

    Streamvln: Streaming vision-and-language navigation via slowfast context modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.05240, 2025

    Meng Wei, Chenyang Wan, Xiqian Yu, Tai Wang, Yuqiang Yang, Xiaohan Mao, Chenming Zhu, Wenzhe Cai, Hanqing Wang, Yilun Chen, Xihui Liu, and Jiangmiao Pang. Streamvln: Streaming vision-and-language navigation via slowfast context modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.05240, 2025

  48. [48]

    Mimo-v2.5

    Xiaomi MiMo Team. Mimo-v2.5. https://huggingface.co/collections/XiaomiMiMo/ mimo-v25, 2026. Accessed: 2026-05-06

  49. [49]

    Gupta, Rilyn Han, Li Fei-Fei, and Saining Xie

    Jihan Yang, Shusheng Yang, Anjali W. Gupta, Rilyn Han, Li Fei-Fei, and Saining Xie. Thinking in space: How multimodal large language models see, remember, and recall spaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025

  50. [50]

    ODI-Bench: Can MLLMs understand immersive omnidirectional environments?arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11549, 2025

    Liu Yang, Huiyu Duan, Ran Tao, Juntao Cheng, Sijing Wu, Yunhao Li, Jing Liu, Xiongkuo Min, and Guangtao Zhai. ODI-Bench: Can MLLMs understand immersive omnidirectional environments?arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11549, 2025. 13

  51. [51]

    Cambrian-S: Towards Spatial Supersensing in Video

    Shusheng Yang, Jihan Yang, Pinzhi Huang, Ellis Brown, Zihao Yang, Yue Yu, Shengbang Tong, Zihan Zheng, Yifan Xu, Muhan Wang, Daohan Lu, Rob Fergus, Yann LeCun, Li Fei- Fei, and Saining Xie. Cambrian-s: Towards spatial supersensing in video.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.04670, 2025

  52. [52]

    Osrt: Omni- directional image super-resolution with distortion-aware transformer

    Fanghua Yu, Xintao Wang, Mingdeng Cao, Gen Li, Ying Shan, and Chao Dong. Osrt: Omni- directional image super-resolution with distortion-aware transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 13283–13292, 2023

  53. [53]

    Thinking in 360 ◦: Humanoid visual search in the wild.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.20351, 2025

    Heyang Yu, Yinan Han, Xiangyu Zhang, Baiqiao Yin, Bowen Chang, Xiangyu Han, Xinhao Liu, Jing Zhang, Marco Pavone, Chen Feng, Saining Xie, and Yiming Li. Thinking in 360 ◦: Humanoid visual search in the wild.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.20351, 2025

  54. [54]

    Pano-avqa: Grounded audio-visual question answering on 360 ◦ videos, 2021

    Heeseung Yun, Youngjae Yu, Wonsuk Yang, Kangil Lee, and Gunhee Kim. Pano-avqa: Grounded audio-visual question answering on 360 ◦ videos, 2021. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2110.05122

  55. [55]

    How to enable llm with 3d capacity? a survey of spatial reasoning in llm

    Junsheng Zha et al. How to enable llm with 3d capacity? a survey of spatial reasoning in llm. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2025

  56. [56]

    Uni-NaVid: A Video-based Vision-Language-Action Model for Unifying Embodied Navigation Tasks

    Jiazhao Zhang, Kunyu Wang, Shaoan Wang, Minghan Li, Haoran Liu, Songlin Wei, Zhongyuan Wang, Zhizheng Zhang, and He Wang. Uni-navid: A video-based vision-language-action model for unifying embodied navigation tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06224, 2024

  57. [57]

    Omnidirectional spatial modeling from correlated panoramas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.02164, 2025

    Xinshen Zhang, Tongxi Fu, and Xu Zheng. Omnidirectional spatial modeling from correlated panoramas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.02164, 2025

  58. [58]

    Towards omnidirectional reasoning with 360-r1: A dataset, benchmark, and GRPO-based method.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14197, 2025

    Xinshen Zhang, Zhen Ye, and Xu Zheng. Towards omnidirectional reasoning with 360-r1: A dataset, benchmark, and GRPO-based method.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14197, 2025

  59. [59]

    Efficient-vln: A training-efficient vision-language navigation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.10310, 2025

    Duo Zheng, Shijia Huang, Yanyang Li, and Liwei Wang. Efficient-vln: A training-efficient vision-language navigation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.10310, 2025

  60. [60]

    Video-3d llm: Learning position-aware video representation for 3d scene understanding

    Duo Zheng, Shijia Huang, and Liwei Wang. Video-3d llm: Learning position-aware video representation for 3d scene understanding. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 8995–9006, 2025

  61. [61]

    Structured3d: A large photo-realistic dataset for structured 3d modeling

    Jia Zheng, Junfei Zhang, Jing Li, Rui Tang, Shenghua Gao, and Zihan Zhou. Structured3d: A large photo-realistic dataset for structured 3d modeling. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 519–535. Springer, 2020

  62. [62]

    Multimodal spatial reasoning in the large model era: A survey and benchmarks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.25760, 2025

    Xu Zheng, Zihao Dongfang, Lutao Jiang, Boyuan Zheng, Yulong Guo, Zhenquan Zhang, Giuliano Albanese, Runyi Yang, Mengjiao Ma, Zixin Zhang, Chenfei Liao, Dingcheng Zhen, Yuanhuiyi Lyu, Yuqian Fu, Bin Ren, Linfeng Zhang, Danda Pani Paudel, Nicu Sebe, Luc Van Gool, and Xuming Hu. Multimodal spatial reasoning in the large model era: A survey and benchmarks.arX...

  63. [63]

    Omnisam: Omnidirectional segment anything model for uda in panoramic semantic segmentation

    Ding Zhong, Xu Zheng, Chenfei Liao, Yuanhuiyi Lyu, Jialei Chen, Shengyang Wu, Linfeng Zhang, and Xuming Hu. Omnisam: Omnidirectional segment anything model for uda in panoramic semantic segmentation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 23892–23901, 2025

  64. [64]

    Dense360: Dense understanding from omnidirectional panoramas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.14471, 2025

    Yikang Zhou, Tao Zhang, Dizhe Zhang, Shunping Ji, Xiangtai Li, and Lu Qi. Dense360: Dense understanding from omnidirectional panoramas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.14471, 2025

  65. [65]

    Llava-3d: A simple yet effective pathway to empowering lmms with 3d capabilities

    Chenming Zhu, Tai Wang, Wenwei Zhang, Jiangmiao Pang, and Xihui Liu. Llava-3d: A simple yet effective pathway to empowering lmms with 3d capabilities. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 4295–4305, 2025

  66. [66]

    thinking with images

    Weiye Zhu, Zekai Zhang, Xiangchen Wang, Hewei Pan, Teng Wang, Tiantian Geng, Rongtao Xu, and Feng Zheng. Navida: Vision-language navigation with inverse dynamics augmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.18188, 2026. 14 A Dataset Details A.1 ERP Corpus Composition Table 9 summarizes the ERP image sources. Our ERP corpus contains 570,321 full-surround panora...