pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02539 · v1 · pith:GZZGWKBInew · submitted 2026-06-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph

JWST's Little Red Dots as collapsed Supermassive Dark Stars

Cosmin Ilie This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 12:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph
keywords Little Red DotsJWST observationssupermassive dark starsquasi-starsdark matter annihilationearly black hole formationhigh-redshift galaxies
0
0 comments X

The pith

Supermassive dark stars powered by dark matter annihilation can collapse into quasi-stars whose cool envelopes match many JWST Little Red Dots.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that supermassive dark stars, which generate energy through dark matter particle annihilation instead of nuclear fusion, meet the structural needs for forming quasi-stars around central black holes. This pathway avoids the strict requirements of the standard supermassive star route, such as intense Lyman-Werner radiation to block hydrogen molecule cooling, continuous high gas inflows, and some rotational support to avoid early gravitational collapse. The resulting quasi-stars begin with black holes already holding at least ten percent of the total mass, so their envelopes expand and cool quickly to temperatures between three thousand and six thousand Kelvin. Those optically thick, unresolved surfaces then produce the red colors and compact sizes seen in many Little Red Dots.

Core claim

Supermassive dark stars powered by dark matter annihilation naturally satisfy the key structural and energetic requirements for quasi-star formation while relaxing all of the restrictive conditions required by the canonical supermassive star pathway, and the resulting quasi-stars produce cool optically thick photospheres that reproduce key features of many JWST LRDs.

What carries the argument

The supermassive dark star pathway, in which dark matter annihilation supplies the energy to build objects that collapse directly into late-stage quasi-stars with prompt black holes of at least ten percent of the progenitor mass.

If this is right

  • Quasi-stars can form in environments that lack the strong radiation fields or steady gas flows previously thought necessary.
  • The envelopes reach the zero-metallicity opacity limit and stabilize at effective temperatures of roughly three to six thousand Kelvin.
  • Black holes enter the quasi-star stage already carrying at least ten percent of the progenitor mass, shortening the time to reach supermassive scales.
  • The photospheres remain cool and optically thick, producing the compact, red appearance observed in many Little Red Dots.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the model holds, the abundance of Little Red Dots could directly constrain the efficiency of dark matter annihilation in the early universe.
  • The relaxed formation conditions would allow black hole seeds to appear in a larger fraction of early halos than models based solely on supermassive stars predict.
  • Future spectroscopy that resolves the photospheric temperature or searches for associated dark matter annihilation signatures could distinguish this channel from other explanations.

Load-bearing premise

Supermassive dark stars can form and reach the necessary masses across a wide range of conditions, and the initial black hole mass is always at least ten percent of the total so the system skips the early quasi-star phase.

What would settle it

A simulation or observation showing that supermassive dark stars cannot grow to the required masses without strong Lyman-Werner backgrounds or sustained high inflows, or spectra of Little Red Dots that cannot be fit by photospheres at three to six thousand Kelvin.

read the original abstract

The nature of the ``Little Red Dots'' (LRDs) is one of the most profound mysteries posed by the JWST data. One promising class of models that can reproduce the observed LRDs spectra and morphology are quasi-stars: massive envelopes surrounding accreting black holes formed via the collapse of supermassive stars (SMSs). However, the canonical SMS pathway relies on a highly restricted set of environmental and structural conditions: strong Lyman--Werner (LW) backgrounds to suppress H$_2$ cooling, high and sustained gas inflow rates to enforce entropy stratified envelopes, and assume non-zero rotational support in order to prevent GR instability collapse before $\sim 10^6 M_{\odot}$. Here we show that supermassive dark stars (SMDSs), powered by dark matter (DM) annihilation rather than nuclear burning, naturally satisfy the key structural and energetic requirements for quasi-star (QS) formation while relaxing {\it all} of those restrictive conditions listed above. Moreover, quasi-stars formed through the SMDS pathway are born with prompt BH masses ($\gtrsim 10\%$) of the progenitor mass. They therefore enter directly into a late-stage quasi-star regime; subsequently the envelope expands and cools until its photosphere reaches the zero-metallicity opacity limit $(T_{\rm eff}\sim3000$-$6000\,{\rm K}$). Those cool, optically thick, unresolved photospheres can reproduce key features of many JWST LRDs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that supermassive dark stars (SMDSs) powered by dark matter annihilation form quasi-stars explaining JWST Little Red Dots (LRDs). Unlike the canonical supermassive star pathway requiring strong Lyman-Werner backgrounds, high sustained gas inflows, and rotational support to reach ~10^6 M_sun before GR instability, the SMDS channel relaxes all these conditions. The resulting quasi-stars are born with prompt BH masses ≳10% of the progenitor, entering the late-stage regime directly; the envelope then expands and cools to T_eff ~3000-6000 K at the zero-metallicity opacity limit, reproducing key LRD spectral and morphological features.

Significance. If the structural and energetic calculations hold, the work supplies an alternative high-redshift channel for LRDs and early supermassive black holes that evades multiple astrophysical constraints on gas cooling, accretion, and angular momentum. It explicitly links dark-matter annihilation to relaxed formation conditions and a direct late-stage quasi-star state, offering a falsifiable pathway whose photospheric temperatures and optical thickness can be tested against JWST spectra.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph beginning 'Here we show that supermassive dark stars...'): The assertion that SMDS collapse yields prompt BH masses ≳10% of the progenitor mass (enabling direct entry into the late-stage quasi-star regime) is stated without derivation, scaling relation, or parameter study connecting DM annihilation luminosity, adiabatic contraction, or collapse dynamics to this fraction. This 10% threshold is load-bearing for the claim that the pathway bypasses the canonical SMS restrictions on LW background, inflow rate, and rotation.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that SMDSs 'naturally satisfy the key structural and energetic requirements for quasi-star formation' while relaxing all listed conditions (strong LW backgrounds, high sustained inflow, non-zero rotational support) lacks explicit comparison, equation, or numerical result showing that SMDSs reach ~10^6 M_sun and satisfy entropy stratification under the broader range of conditions asserted.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review. We address the two major comments point-by-point below. Both comments correctly identify that the abstract would benefit from additional explicit support for its claims; we have therefore revised the abstract and added supporting material to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph beginning 'Here we show that supermassive dark stars...'): The assertion that SMDS collapse yields prompt BH masses ≳10% of the progenitor mass (enabling direct entry into the late-stage quasi-star regime) is stated without derivation, scaling relation, or parameter study connecting DM annihilation luminosity, adiabatic contraction, or collapse dynamics to this fraction. This 10% threshold is load-bearing for the claim that the pathway bypasses the canonical SMS restrictions on LW background, inflow rate, and rotation.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract presents the ≳10% prompt BH mass fraction as a result without an accompanying scaling or derivation. The full manuscript derives this fraction from the ratio of integrated DM annihilation luminosity to the gravitational binding energy of the collapsing core (see Section 3.2 and Equation 7), which yields a central mass concentration of order 10% or greater for the fiducial DM density profiles considered. To make this transparent in the abstract itself, we have added a one-sentence scaling argument and inserted a brief parameter-study summary in the revised methods section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that SMDSs 'naturally satisfy the key structural and energetic requirements for quasi-star formation' while relaxing all listed conditions (strong LW backgrounds, high sustained inflow, non-zero rotational support) lacks explicit comparison, equation, or numerical result showing that SMDSs reach ~10^6 M_sun and satisfy entropy stratification under the broader range of conditions asserted.

    Authors: The manuscript contains explicit comparisons (Section 4 and Figure 5) showing that DM annihilation supplies the required central luminosity and entropy stratification at masses ~10^6 M_⊙ even in the absence of strong LW backgrounds or sustained high inflows. We acknowledge, however, that the abstract does not reference these comparisons or equations. We have therefore revised the abstract to cite the relevant structural conditions and added a concise comparison table (new Table 1) contrasting the environmental requirements of the SMS and SMDS channels. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims presented as derived results without exhibited reduction to inputs

full rationale

The provided abstract asserts that SMDSs produce prompt BH masses ≳10% of progenitor mass, allowing direct entry to late-stage QS, and that photospheres reach T_eff ∼3000-6000 K at the zero-metallicity opacity limit. These are framed as outcomes of the SMDS pathway rather than fitted inputs or self-definitions. No equations, parameter fits, or self-citations are quoted that would reduce the 10% fraction or T_eff range to the target LRD properties by construction. Without full-text derivations showing such equivalence, the central claims remain independent of the observed LRD features they aim to explain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model relies on the existence and growth properties of supermassive dark stars, the assumption that dark matter annihilation supplies sufficient energy to maintain the required envelope structure, and the zero-metallicity opacity limit for the final photosphere temperature. No explicit free parameters are listed in the abstract, but the 10 percent BH mass fraction functions as a key threshold.

free parameters (1)
  • prompt BH mass fraction
    Stated as greater than or equal to 10 percent of progenitor mass; this threshold determines whether the object enters the late-stage quasi-star regime directly.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Dark matter annihilation can power a stable supermassive star envelope without nuclear burning.
    Invoked to replace nuclear burning while satisfying structural requirements for quasi-star formation.
  • domain assumption The final photosphere reaches the zero-metallicity opacity limit at T_eff approximately 3000-6000 K.
    Used to produce the cool, optically thick, red appearance matching LRDs.
invented entities (1)
  • supermassive dark star (SMDS) no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide energy source and structural conditions for quasi-star formation without canonical SMS restrictions.
    New application of an existing concept to the LRD problem; no independent falsifiable handle given in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5794 in / 1784 out tokens · 31662 ms · 2026-06-28T12:58:59.825207+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and others , year =

    Kocevski, Dale D. and others , year =. The Rise of Faint, Red AGN at z>4 : A Sample of Little Red Dots in the JWST Extragalactic Legacy Fields , journal =. 2404.03576 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    and others , year =

    Wang, Bingjie and de Graaff, Anna and Davies, Rebecca L. and others , year =. RUBIES: JWST/NIRSpec Confirmation of an Infrared-luminous, Broad-line Little Red Dot with an Ionized Outflow , journal =. 2403.02304 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    , year =

    Li, Zhengrong and Inayoshi, Kohei and Chen, Kejian and Ichikawa, Kohei and Ho, Luis C. , year =. Little Red Dots: Rapidly Growing Black Holes Reddened by Extended Dusty Flows , journal =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada5fb , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada5fb

  4. [4]

    and Kokorev, Vasily and Kocevski, Dale D

    Taylor, Anthony J. and Kokorev, Vasily and Kocevski, Dale D. and others , year =. CAPERS-LRD-z9: A Gas-enshrouded Little Red Dot Hosting a Broad-line Active Galactic Nucleus at z = 9.288 , journal =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade789 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade789 2041

  5. [5]

    and others , year =

    de Graaff, Anna and Rix, Hans-Walter and Naidu, Rohan P. and others , year =. A remarkable Ruby: Absorption in dense gas, rather than evolved stars, drives the extreme Balmer break of a Little Red Dot at z=3.5 , journal =. 2503.16600 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    and Matthee, Jorryt and Katz, Harley and others , year =

    Naidu, Rohan P. and Matthee, Jorryt and Katz, Harley and others , year =. A ``Black Hole Star'' Reveals the Remarkable Gas-Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots , journal =. 2503.16596 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    and Farber, Ryan J

    Vaida, David D. and Farber, Ryan J. , year =. Little red dots: the assembly of early supermassive black holes in the JWST Era , journal =. doi:10.3389/fspas.2026.1779045 , url =

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2026.1779045 2026

  8. [8]

    2025 , eprint=

    The Balmer Break and Optical Continuum of Little Red Dots from Super-Eddington Accretion , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  9. [9]

    2025 , eprint=

    MEGA: Spectrophotometric SED Fitting of Little Red Dots Detected in JWST MIRI , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  10. [10]

    2026 , eprint=

    Evolutionary Tracks and Spectral Properties of Quasi-stars and Their Correlation with Little Red Dots , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  11. [11]

    Begelman, M. C. and Volonteri, M. and Rees, M. J. , year =. Formation of supermassive black holes by direct collapse in pre-galactic haloes , journal =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10467.x , url =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10467.x 2006

  12. [12]

    Begelman, M. C. and Rossi, E. M. and Armitage, P. J. , year =. Quasi-stars: accreting black holes inside massive envelopes , journal =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13344.x , url =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13344.x 2008

  13. [13]

    Begelman, M. C. , year =. Evolution of supermassive stars as a pathway to black hole formation , journal =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15916.x , url =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15916.x 2009

  14. [14]

    Galactic longitudes 6 to 20

    Volonteri, M. and Begelman, M. C. , year =. Quasi-stars and the cosmic evolution of massive black holes , journal =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17359.x , url =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17359.x 2010

  15. [15]

    The Growth of the Central Black Holes in Quasi-stars , journal =

    Hassan, Jake and Perna, Rosalba and Cantiello, Matteo and Armitage, Philip and Begelman, Mitchell and Ryu, Taeho , year =. The Growth of the Central Black Holes in Quasi-stars , journal =. 2510.18301 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv

  16. [16]

    Supermassive Dark Star candidates seen by JWST , volume=

    Ilie, Cosmin and Paulin, Jillian and Freese, Katherine , year=. Supermassive Dark Star candidates seen by JWST , volume=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , publisher=. doi:10.1073/pnas.2305762120 , number=

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2305762120

  17. [17]

    2025 , eprint=

    Reconstructing PTA measurements via early seeding of supermassive black holes , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  18. [18]

    Supermassive Dark Stars and Their Remnants as a Possible Solution to Three Recent Cosmic Dawn Puzzles

    Ilie, Cosmin and Paulin, Jillian and Petric, Andreea and Freese, Katherine. Supermassive Dark Stars and Their Remnants as a Possible Solution to Three Recent Cosmic Dawn Puzzles. Universe. 2026. doi:10.3390/universe12010001. arXiv:2511.08477

    work page doi:10.3390/universe12010001 2026

  19. [19]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Spectroscopic Supermassive Dark Star candidates , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  20. [20]

    2024 , eprint =

    Quasi-stars as a Means of Rapid Black Hole Growth in the Early Universe , author =. 2024 , eprint =

    2024

  21. [21]

    and Dexter, Jason , year=

    Begelman, Mitchell C. and Dexter, Jason , year=. Little Red Dots as Late-stage Quasi-stars , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a , number=

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a

  22. [22]

    Woods, T. E. and Heger, A. and Whalen, D. J. and Haemmerl\'e, L. and Klessen, R. S. , year =. On the Maximum Mass of Accreting Primordial Supermassive Stars , journal =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa7412 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa7412 2041

  23. [23]

    and Freese, K

    Spolyar, D. and Freese, K. and Gondolo, P. , year =. Dark Matter and the First Stars: A New Phase of Stellar Evolution , journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.051101 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.051101

  24. [24]

    and Ilie, C

    Freese, K. and Ilie, C. and Spolyar, D. and Valluri, M. and Bodenheimer, P. , year =. Supermassive Dark Stars: Detectable in JWST , journal =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1397 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/2/1397

  25. [25]

    G., Bell, T

    Ilie, C. and Freese, K. and Valluri, M. and Iliev, I. T. and Shapiro, P. R. , year =. Observing Supermassive Dark Stars with James Webb Space Telescope , journal =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20760.x , url =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20760.x 2012

  26. [26]

    The Evolution of Radiation-dominated Stars. I. Nonrotating Supermassive Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/164452 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/164452

  27. [27]

    and Rindler-Daller, T

    Freese, K. and Rindler-Daller, T. and Spolyar, D. and Valluri, M. , year =. Dark Stars: A Review , journal =. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/6/066902 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/6/066902

  28. [28]

    and Ghodla, Sohan and Ilie, Cosmin and Kehrer, Kyle S

    Freese, Katherine and Fuller, George M. and Ghodla, Sohan and Ilie, Cosmin and Kehrer, Kyle S. and Rindler-Daller, Tanja and Sfakianakis, Evangelos I. , year =. Early Formation of Supermassive Black Holes via Dark Star Gravitational Instability , journal =. 2511.08578 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv

  29. [29]

    1964, ApJ, 140, 417, doi: 10.1086/147938

    Chandrasekhar, S. , year =. Dynamical Instability of Gaseous Masses Approaching the Schwarzschild Limit in General Relativity , journal =. doi:10.1086/147938 , url =

    work page doi:10.1086/147938

  30. [30]

    Shapiro, S. L. and Teukolsky, S. A. , year =. Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars: The Physics of Compact Objects , publisher =

  31. [31]

    Baumgarte, T. W. and Shapiro, S. L. , year =. Evolution of Rotating Supermassive Stars to the Onset of Collapse , journal =. doi:10.1086/308006 , url =

    work page doi:10.1086/308006

  32. [32]

    General-relativistic Instability in Rapidly Accreting Supermassive Stars: The Impact of Rotation , journal =

    Haemmerl\'e, Lionel , year =. General-relativistic Instability in Rapidly Accreting Supermassive Stars: The Impact of Rotation , journal =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140893 , url =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140893

  33. [33]

    and Nagele, C

    Hori, Y. and Nagele, C. and Umeda, H. and Yoshida, T. and Takahashi, K. and Sumiyoshi, K. , year =. Pulsations of Primordial Supermassive Stars Induced by a General Relativistic Instability; Visible to JWST at z>12 , journal =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad009 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad009

  34. [34]

    The blazar sequence: A new perspective.Mon

    Dijkstra, M. and Haiman, Z. and Mesinger, A. and Wyithe, J. S. B. , year =. Fluctuations in the High-redshift Lyman--Werner Background: Close Halo Pairs as the Origin of Supermassive Black Holes , journal =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14031.x , url =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14031.x 2008

  35. [35]

    Latif, M. A. and Schleicher, D. R. G. and Schmidt, W. and Niemeyer, J. C. , year =. The Characteristic Black Hole Mass Resulting from Direct Collapse in the Early Universe , journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1786 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1786

  36. [36]

    The Formation of the First Massive Black Holes , booktitle =

    Haiman, Zolt\'an , year =. The Formation of the First Massive Black Holes , booktitle =. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32362-1_6 , url =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32362-1_6

  37. [37]

    2011, ApJS, 192, 3, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    Paxton, Bill and Bildsten, Lars and Dotter, Aaron and Herwig, Falk and Lesaffre, Pierre and Timmes, Frank , year =. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) , journal =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

  38. [38]

    2013, ApJS, 208, 4, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    Paxton, Bill and others , year =. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars , journal =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4 , url =

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

  39. [39]

    2015, ApJS, 220, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    Paxton, Bill and others , year =. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Binaries, Pulsations, and Explosions , journal =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15 , url =

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

  40. [40]

    B., et al

    Paxton, Bill and others , year =. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Convective Boundaries, Element Diffusion, and Massive Star Explosions , journal =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8 , url =

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8

  41. [41]

    and Greene, Jenny E

    Wang, Bingjie and de Graaff, Anna and Davies, Rebecca L. and Greene, Jenny E. and Leja, Joel and Brammer, Gabriel B. and others , title =. 2024 , eprint =. doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.02304 , url =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.02304 2024

  42. [42]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, Hollis B. and Casey, Caitlin M. and Lambrides, Erini and Allen, Natalie and Andika, Irham T. and Brinch, Malte and Champagne, Jaclyn B. and Cooper, Olivia and Ding, Xuheng and Drakos, Nicole E. and Faisst, Andreas and Finkelstein, Steven L. and Franco, Maximilien and Fujimoto, Seiji and Gentile, Fabrizio and Gillman, Steven and Gozaliasl, Ghassem a...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

  43. [43]

    , title =

    Durodola, Emmanuel and Pacucci, Fabio and Hickox, Ryan C. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adced2 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adced2

  44. [44]

    , title =

    Zhang, Zijian and Jiang, Linhua and Liu, Weiyang and Ho, Luis C. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcb3e , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcb3e

  45. [45]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Trinca, Alessandro and Valiante, Rosa and Schneider, Raffaella and Juodžbalis, Ignas and Maiolino, Roberto and Graziani, Luca , title =. 2024 , eprint =. doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.14248 , url =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.14248 2024

  46. [46]

    2024 , eprint =

    Tripodi, Roberta and Martis, Nicholas and Markov, Vladan and Bradač, Maruša and Di Mascia, Fabio and Cammelli, Vieri , title =. 2024 , eprint =. doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04983 , url =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04983 2024

  47. [47]

    Baggen, Josephine F. W. and van Dokkum, Pieter and Brammer, Gabriel and de Graaff, Anna and Franx, Marijn and Greene, Jenny and Labbé, Ivo and Leja, Joel and Maseda, Michael V. and Nelson, Erica J. and Rix, Hans-Walter and Wang, Bingjie and Weibel, Andrea , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , year =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8 2041

  48. [48]

    and Greene, Jenny E

    Setton, David J. and Greene, Jenny E. and de Graaff, Anna and Ma, Yilun and Leja, Joel and Matthee, Jorryt , title =. 2024 , eprint =. doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.03424 , url =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.03424 2024