pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30712 · v1 · pith:KSSRAF65new · submitted 2026-06-29 · ✦ hep-th

Non-supersymmetric dualities beyond the gauge algebra

Bernardo Fraiman , Vittorio Larotonda , Ling Lin , Salvatore Raucci This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords non-supersymmetric dualitiestype 0 orientifoldsheterotic stringsbosonic stringsgauge group global formsBlum-Dienes dualityBergman-Gaberdiel dualitybrane state scan
0
0 comments X

The pith

The global forms of gauge groups match in non-supersymmetric string dualities between orientifolds and heterotic or bosonic theories.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether two proposed dualities between non-supersymmetric string theories hold when the full global structure of the gauge groups is compared, rather than just the Lie algebra. It does this for the Blum-Dienes duality connecting type 0 orientifolds to heterotic strings and the Bergman-Gaberdiel duality connecting them to bosonic strings. The key test involves scanning brane states in the orientifold description to identify which spinorial representations are present, which in turn determines the precise global form of the gauge group. This is then compared to the gauge groups arising naturally from the momentum lattices in the dual theories. The structures match in both cases, with only a minor adjustment needed for one of the dualities.

Core claim

We test two dualities of non-supersymmetric type 0 orientifolds with heterotic and bosonic string theories, the Blum--Dienes and the Bergman--Gaberdiel proposals, by comparing the global forms of the gauge groups on both sides. On the orientifold side, we perform a scan of brane states, similar to the case of the D0-brane in type I string theory, and identify spinorial states that constrain the gauge group; on the heterotic and bosonic side, the gauge groups are provided by the internal momentum lattices. In both cases, we find agreement between the group structure of the orientifolds and the proposed duals, up to a subtle projection for the Bergman--Gaberdiel duality.

What carries the argument

Brane state scan identifying spinorial states that constrain the global form of the gauge group on the orientifold side, matched to momentum lattice gauge groups on the dual side.

If this is right

  • The Blum-Dienes duality preserves the full global gauge group structure.
  • The Bergman-Gaberdiel duality requires a projection to align the gauge group structures.
  • The identification of spinorial states via brane scans determines the allowed global forms in orientifold theories.
  • Agreement at this level supports the consistency of the proposed dualities beyond the gauge algebra.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The technique of using brane state scans to fix global group forms might apply to testing other string theory dualities.
  • If these dualities hold at the group level, they could imply preservation of non-perturbative information as well.
  • Explicit lattice computations in the heterotic and bosonic sides could be cross-checked against additional orientifold projections.

Load-bearing premise

That the spinorial states identified via the brane state scan on the orientifold side correctly constrain the global form of the gauge group.

What would settle it

Finding that the spinorial representations allowed by the brane scan on the orientifold do not match those permitted by the momentum lattice in the dual theory would disprove the agreement of the global group structures.

read the original abstract

We test two dualities of non-supersymmetric type 0 orientifolds with heterotic and bosonic string theories, the Blum--Dienes and the Bergman--Gaberdiel proposals, by comparing the global forms of the gauge groups on both sides. On the orientifold side, we perform a scan of brane states, similar to the case of the D0-brane in type I string theory, and identify spinorial states that constrain the gauge group; on the heterotic and bosonic side, the gauge groups are provided by the internal momentum lattices. In both cases, we find agreement between the group structure of the orientifolds and the proposed duals, up to a subtle projection for the Bergman--Gaberdiel duality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript tests two proposed non-supersymmetric dualities (Blum--Dienes between type 0 orientifolds and heterotic strings; Bergman--Gaberdiel with bosonic strings) by comparing the global forms of the gauge groups. On the orientifold side a brane-state scan (analogous to the D0-brane scan in type I) is used to identify spinorial states that constrain the gauge group; on the dual sides the groups are read off from the internal momentum lattices. Agreement is reported in both cases, up to a subtle projection in the Bergman--Gaberdiel duality.

Significance. If the brane scan is shown to produce precisely the claimed spinorial states with no extraneous states, the work would supply a non-trivial consistency check for these dualities outside the supersymmetric regime, where BPS saturation and index theorems are unavailable. Explicit matching of global group structure (rather than Lie algebra only) is a concrete, falsifiable test that strengthens the proposals.

major comments (1)
  1. [Brane scan and spectrum analysis (main text)] The central claim rests on the brane scan correctly fixing the global gauge group via the presence or absence of spinorial states. Because the setting is non-supersymmetric, there is no BPS protection or index theorem guaranteeing the open-string spectrum. The manuscript must therefore exhibit the explicit open-string spectrum between the scanned branes (including the orientifold projection) to demonstrate that only the claimed spinors appear and that no additional states would allow a larger center or different global form. The already-noted 'subtle projection' in the Bergman--Gaberdiel case underscores that the matching is not automatic and requires this explicit verification.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a brief statement of the concrete method used to extract the open-string spectrum in the brane scan.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for highlighting the importance of explicit spectrum verification in the non-supersymmetric setting. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Brane scan and spectrum analysis (main text)] The central claim rests on the brane scan correctly fixing the global gauge group via the presence or absence of spinorial states. Because the setting is non-supersymmetric, there is no BPS protection or index theorem guaranteeing the open-string spectrum. The manuscript must therefore exhibit the explicit open-string spectrum between the scanned branes (including the orientifold projection) to demonstrate that only the claimed spinors appear and that no additional states would allow a larger center or different global form. The already-noted 'subtle projection' in the Bergman--Gaberdiel case underscores that the matching is not automatic and requires this explicit verification.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit display of the open-string spectra is necessary to rigorously establish the absence of extraneous states in the non-supersymmetric case. The manuscript already performs the brane scan by computing the relevant open-string sectors (including the orientifold projection) and extracts the spinorial states that fix the global form, with the subtle projection in the Bergman--Gaberdiel duality noted explicitly. To strengthen the presentation, we will add a dedicated appendix in the revised version that tabulates the mode expansions, GSO and orientifold projections, and resulting massless spectra for the scanned brane pairs. This will confirm that only the claimed spinors appear and that no additional states modify the center. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: independent brane-scan and lattice constructions compared directly

full rationale

The paper's central procedure compares gauge-group global forms obtained via an orientifold brane-state scan (identifying spinorial states) against those read off from heterotic/bosonic momentum lattices. These are distinct, non-overlapping constructions with no shared fitted parameters, no self-definitional loop, and no load-bearing self-citation invoked to force the match. The reported agreement (including the noted subtle projection) is therefore a genuine test outcome rather than a renaming or re-derivation of the input data. No step reduces by construction to its own premises.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5652 in / 952 out tokens · 45169 ms · 2026-07-01T02:14:55.749129+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · 34 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking

    J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, “An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking,” arXiv:1711.11494 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Supersymmetry breaking and stability in string vacua: Brane dynamics, bubbles and the swampland,

    I. Basile, “Supersymmetry breaking and stability in string vacua: Brane dynamics, bubbles and the swampland,”Riv. Nuovo Cim.44no. 10, (2021) 499–596, arXiv:2107.02814 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Angelantonj and I

    C. Angelantonj and I. Florakis,A Lightning Introduction to String Theory. Handbook of Quantum Gravity, 2024.arXiv:2406.09508 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Raucci,Spacetime aspects of non-supersymmetric strings

    S. Raucci,Spacetime aspects of non-supersymmetric strings. PhD thesis, Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore, 9, 2024.arXiv:2409.19395 [hep-th]. 41

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Aspects of strings without spacetime supersymmetry

    G. Leone and S. Raucci, “Aspects of strings without spacetime supersymmetry,” Riv. Nuovo Cim.49no. 3, (2026) 75–136,arXiv:2509.24703 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    Dudas, J

    E. Dudas, J. Mourad, and A. Sagnotti, “Supersymmetry breaking with fields, strings and branes,”Phys. Rept.1175(2026) 1–256,arXiv:2511.04367 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    A Non-Supersymmetric Open String Theory and S-Duality

    O. Bergman and M. R. Gaberdiel, “A Nonsupersymmetric open string theory and S duality,”Nucl. Phys. B499(1997) 183–204,arXiv:hep-th/9701137

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  8. [8]

    Duality without Supersymmetry: The Case of the SO(16)xSO(16) String

    J. D. Blum and K. R. Dienes, “Duality without supersymmetry: The Case of the SO(16) x SO(16) string,”Phys. Lett. B414(1997) 260–268,arXiv:hep-th/9707148

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  9. [9]

    Strong/Weak Coupling Duality Relations for Non-Supersymmetric String Theories

    J. D. Blum and K. R. Dienes, “Strong / weak coupling duality relations for nonsupersymmetric string theories,”Nucl. Phys. B516(1998) 83–159, arXiv:hep-th/9707160

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  10. [10]

    Dualities of Type 0 Strings

    O. Bergman and M. R. Gaberdiel, “Dualities of type 0 strings,”JHEP07(1999) 022,arXiv:hep-th/9906055

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  11. [11]

    A Note on Orientifolds and Dualities of Type 0B String Theory

    R. Blumenhagen and A. Kumar, “A Note on orientifolds and dualities of type 0B string theory,”Phys. Lett. B464(1999) 46–52,arXiv:hep-th/9906234

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  12. [12]

    Metastable String Vacua

    C. Angelantonj and E. Dudas, “Metastable string vacua,”Phys. Lett. B651(2007) 239–245,arXiv:0704.2553 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [13]

    On the Low Energy Spectra of the Nonsupersymmetric Heterotic String Theories

    A. E. Faraggi and M. Tsulaia, “On the Low Energy Spectra of the Nonsupersymmetric Heterotic String Theories,”Eur. Phys. J. C54(2008) 495–500, arXiv:0706.1649 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  14. [14]

    Heterotic strings onT 3/Z2, Nikulin involutions and M-theory,

    B. S. Acharya, G. Aldazabal, A. Font, K. Narain, and I. G. Zadeh, “Heterotic strings onT 3/Z2, Nikulin involutions and M-theory,”JHEP09(2022) 209, arXiv:2205.09764 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Anomaly inflow and gauge group topology in the 10d Sugimoto string theory,

    V. Larotonda and L. Lin, “Anomaly inflow and gauge group topology in the 10d Sugimoto string theory,”JHEP06(2025) 136,arXiv:2412.17894 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Fraiman and H

    B. Fraiman and H. Parra de Freitas, “Symmetries and dualities in non-supersymmetric CHL strings,”arXiv:2511.01674 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    M-theory onS1∨S1 as Type 0A,

    Z. K. Baykara, E. Dudas, and C. Vafa, “M-theory onS1∨S1 as Type 0A,” arXiv:2603.13468 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Ho\v{r}ava-Witten theory on ${\mathbf{S}}^1\vee{\mathbf{S}}^1$ as type 0 orientifold

    C. Altavista, E. Anastasi, S. Raucci, A. M. Uranga, and C. Wang, “Hořava-Witten theory onS 1∨S1 as type 0 orientifold,”arXiv:2603.25786 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    A Duality Web for Non-Supersymmetric Strings

    Z. K. Baykara, M. Delgado, E. Dudas, H. P. De Freitas, and C. Vafa, “A Duality Web for Non-Supersymmetric Strings,”arXiv:2604.07433 [hep-th]. 42

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Heterotic Ouroboros

    C. Altavista, S. Raucci, A. M. Uranga, and C. Wang, “Heterotic Ouroboros,” arXiv:2604.22915 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Towards Wedge Construction of Four-Dimensional Non-Supersymmetric Theories and Torsion Classes

    K. Dasgupta and R. Tatar, “Towards Wedge Construction of Four-Dimensional Non-Supersymmetric Theories and Torsion Classes,”arXiv:2605.05333 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    String dualities and wedge singularities

    I. Basile and D. Lüst, “String dualities and wedge singularities,”arXiv:2606.05287 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    A Circle That Won't Return: The Fate of RR Fluxes and D-branes in Type 0A Tachyon Condensation

    A. R. Kamal, “A Circle That Won’t Return: The Fate of RR Fluxes and D-branes in Type 0A Tachyon Condensation,”arXiv:2606.26280 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    D-Branes And K-Theory

    E. Witten, “D-branes and K-theory,”JHEP12(1998) 019,arXiv:hep-th/9810188

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  25. [25]

    Gauge Theories and Magnetic Charge,

    P. Goddard, J. Nuyts, and D. I. Olive, “Gauge Theories and Magnetic Charge,” Nucl. Phys. B125(1977) 1–28

    1977

  26. [26]

    Magnetic Monopoles as Gauge Particles?,

    C. Montonen and D. I. Olive, “Magnetic Monopoles as Gauge Particles?,”Phys. Lett. B72(1977) 117–120

    1977

  27. [27]

    Topological Charges for N=4 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and Monopoles of Spin 1,

    H. Osborn, “Topological Charges for N=4 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and Monopoles of Spin 1,”Phys. Lett. B83(1979) 321–326

    1979

  28. [28]

    Anomalies and Nonsupersymmetric D-Branes,

    E. Witten, “Anomalies and Nonsupersymmetric D-Branes,”arXiv:2305.01012 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Open strings and their symmetry groups

    A. Sagnotti, “Open Strings and their Symmetry Groups,” inNATO Advanced Summer Institute on Nonperturbative Quantum Field Theory (Cargese Summer Institute). 9, 1987.arXiv:hep-th/0208020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1987

  30. [30]

    Open String Orbifolds,

    G. Pradisi and A. Sagnotti, “Open String Orbifolds,”Phys. Lett. B216(1989) 59–67

    1989

  31. [31]

    Strings on World Sheet Orbifolds,

    P. Horava, “Strings on World Sheet Orbifolds,”Nucl. Phys. B327(1989) 461–484

    1989

  32. [32]

    On the systematics of open string theories,

    M. Bianchi and A. Sagnotti, “On the systematics of open string theories,”Phys. Lett. B247(1990) 517–524

    1990

  33. [33]

    Twist symmetry and open string Wilson lines,

    M. Bianchi and A. Sagnotti, “Twist symmetry and open string Wilson lines,”Nucl. Phys. B361(1991) 519–538

    1991

  34. [34]

    Toroidal compactification and symmetry breaking in open string theories,

    M. Bianchi, G. Pradisi, and A. Sagnotti, “Toroidal compactification and symmetry breaking in open string theories,”Nucl. Phys. B376(1992) 365–386

    1992

  35. [35]

    SO(32) Spinors of Type I and Other Solitons on Brane-Antibrane Pair

    A. Sen, “SO(32) spinors of type I and other solitons on brane - anti-brane pair,” JHEP09(1998) 023,arXiv:hep-th/9808141

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  36. [36]

    Type I D-particle and its Interactions

    A. Sen, “Type I D particle and its interactions,”JHEP10(1998) 021, arXiv:hep-th/9809111. 43

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  37. [37]

    Non-BPS States and Branes in String Theory

    A. Sen, “NonBPS states and Branes in string theory,” inAdvanced School on Supersymmetry in the Theories of Fields, Strings and Branes, pp. 187–234. 1, 1999. arXiv:hep-th/9904207

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  38. [38]

    Ten Dimensional Heterotic String as a Soliton

    A. Dabholkar, “Ten-dimensional heterotic string as a soliton,”Phys. Lett. B357 (1995) 307–312,arXiv:hep-th/9506160

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  39. [39]

    String-String Duality in Ten Dimensions

    C. M. Hull, “String-string duality in ten-dimensions,”Phys. Lett. B357(1995) 545–551,arXiv:hep-th/9506194

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  40. [40]

    Evidence for Heterotic - Type I String Duality

    J. Polchinski and E. Witten, “Evidence for heterotic - type I string duality,”Nucl. Phys. B460(1996) 525–540,arXiv:hep-th/9510169

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  41. [41]

    Some Properties of Open - String Theories

    A. Sagnotti, “Some properties of open string theories,” inSupersymmetry and unification of fundamental interactions. Proceedings, International Workshop, SUSY 95, Palaiseau, France, May 15-19, pp. 473–484. 1995.arXiv:hep-th/9509080 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  42. [42]

    Surprises in Open-String Perturbation Theory

    A. Sagnotti, “Surprises in open string perturbation theory,”Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 56B(1997) 332–343,arXiv:hep-th/9702093 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  43. [43]

    Open Strings

    C. Angelantonj and A. Sagnotti, “Open strings,”Phys. Rept.371(2002) 1–150, arXiv:hep-th/0204089. [Erratum: Phys.Rept. 376, 407 (2003)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  44. [44]

    Sewing Constraints and Non-Orientable Open Strings

    D. Fioravanti, G. Pradisi, and A. Sagnotti, “Sewing constraints and nonorientable open strings,”Phys. Lett. B321(1994) 349–354,arXiv:hep-th/9311183

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  45. [45]

    The Open Descendants of Non-Diagonal SU(2) WZW Models

    G. Pradisi, A. Sagnotti, and Y. S. Stanev, “The Open descendants of nondiagonal SU(2) WZW models,”Phys. Lett. B356(1995) 230–238,arXiv:hep-th/9506014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  46. [46]

    Charged and Uncharged D-branes in various String Theories

    E. Dudas, J. Mourad, and A. Sagnotti, “Charged and uncharged D-branes in various string theories,”Nucl. Phys. B620(2002) 109–151,arXiv:hep-th/0107081

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  47. [47]

    Kaidi, J

    J. Kaidi, J. Parra-Martinez, and Y. Tachikawa, “Topological Superconductors on Superstring Worldsheets,”SciPost Phys.9(2020) 10,arXiv:1911.11780 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, P. H. Ginsparg, G. W. Moore, and C. Vafa, “An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String,”Phys. Lett. B171(1986) 155–162

    1986

  49. [49]

    String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Supersymmetry,

    L. J. Dixon and J. A. Harvey, “String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Supersymmetry,”Nucl. Phys. B274(1986) 93–105

    1986

  50. [50]

    Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings on a circle,

    B. Fraiman, M. Graña, H. Parra De Freitas, and S. Sethi, “Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings on a circle,”JHEP12(2024) 082,arXiv:2307.13745 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    The Semispin Groups in String Theory

    B. McInnes, “The Semispin groups in string theory,”J. Math. Phys.40(1999) 4699–4712,arXiv:hep-th/9906059. 44

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  52. [52]

    Spontaneous Supersymmetry Breaking in Supersymmetric String Theories,

    R. Rohm, “Spontaneous Supersymmetry Breaking in Supersymmetric String Theories,”Nucl. Phys. B237(1984) 553–572

    1984

  53. [53]

    Supersymmetry Restoration in the Compactified O(16) x O(16)′Heterotic String Theory,

    H. Itoyama and T. R. Taylor, “Supersymmetry Restoration in the Compactified O(16) x O(16)′Heterotic String Theory,”Phys. Lett. B186(1987) 129–133

    1987

  54. [54]

    Toroidal Compactification of Nonsupersymmetric Heterotic Strings,

    P. H. Ginsparg and C. Vafa, “Toroidal Compactification of Nonsupersymmetric Heterotic Strings,”Nucl. Phys. B289(1987) 414

    1987

  55. [55]

    D0-branes in SO(32)$\times$SO(32) open type 0 string theory

    Y. Michishita, “D0-branes in SO(32) x SO(32) open type 0 string theory,”Phys. Lett. B466(1999) 161,arXiv:hep-th/9907094

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  56. [56]

    Anomaly Cancellations in the Type I D9-anti-D9 System and the USp(32) String Theory

    S. Sugimoto, “Anomaly cancellations in type I D-9 - anti-D-9 system and the USp(32) string theory,”Prog. Theor. Phys.102(1999) 685–699, arXiv:hep-th/9905159

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  57. [57]

    String Universality in Six Dimensions

    V. Kumar and W. Taylor, “String Universality in Six Dimensions,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.15no. 2, (2011) 325–353,arXiv:0906.0987 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  58. [58]

    String universality in ten dimensions

    A. Adams, O. DeWolfe, and W. Taylor, “String universality in ten dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 071601,arXiv:1006.1352 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  59. [59]

    Branes and the Swampland,

    H.-C. Kim, G. Shiu, and C. Vafa, “Branes and the Swampland,”Phys. Rev. D100 no. 6, (2019) 066006,arXiv:1905.08261 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Four-dimensionalN=4SYM theory and the swampland,

    H.-C. Kim, H.-C. Tarazi, and C. Vafa, “Four-dimensionalN=4SYM theory and the swampland,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 2, (2020) 026003,arXiv:1912.06144 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    String Universality and Non-Simply-Connected Gauge Groups in 8d,

    M. Cvetič, M. Dierigl, L. Lin, and H. Y. Zhang, “String Universality and Non-Simply-Connected Gauge Groups in 8d,”Phys. Rev. Lett.125no. 21, (2020) 211602,arXiv:2008.10605 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Montero and C

    M. Montero and C. Vafa, “Cobordism Conjecture, Anomalies, and the String Lamppost Principle,”JHEP01(2021) 063,arXiv:2008.11729 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    8d supergravity, reconstruction of internal geometry and the Swampland,

    Y. Hamada and C. Vafa, “8d supergravity, reconstruction of internal geometry and the Swampland,”JHEP06(2021) 178,arXiv:2104.05724 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Compactness of brane moduli and the String Lamppost Principle in d>6,

    A. Bedroya, Y. Hamada, M. Montero, and C. Vafa, “Compactness of brane moduli and the String Lamppost Principle in d>6,”JHEP02(2022) 082, arXiv:2110.10157 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    Towards a complete classification of 6D supergravities,

    Y. Hamada and G. J. Loges, “Towards a complete classification of 6D supergravities,”JHEP02(2024) 095,arXiv:2311.00868 [hep-th]. 45

    work page arXiv 2024