Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 10 cited by

More on genuine multi-entropy and holography

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes a systematic construction of genuine multi-entropy for any number of subsystems, with integer partitions fixing the number of free parameters and yielding $N(q)+1$ independent diagnostics for genuine $q$-partite…

desk verdict A solid, genuinely useful extension of the authors' own GM construction for q=3,4,5; the advertised 'any q' prescription rests on an unproven rank assumption, and the holographic claim leans on the flagged multiway-cut proposal. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.16589 v3 pith:KZSXJ4IA submitted 2025-04-23 hep-th gr-qcquant-ph

Norihiro Iizuka , Simon Lin , Mitsuhiro Nishida This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qcquant-ph PACS 03.67.Mn11.25.Tq
keywords genuinemulti-entropymultipartiteentanglementintegerpartitionsholographicmultiwaycutsAdS3/CFT2tripartiteinformationquantumerrorcorrection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a general recipe for constructing genuine multi-entropy $GM_n^{(q)}$, a family of quantities designed to detect entanglement shared by all $q$ parts of a division while vanishing on every state that factorizes into fewer than $q$ entangled pieces. The recipe is organized by integer partitions of $q$, and the paper shows that the $q$-partite genuine multi-entropy contains exactly $N(q) = p(q)-p(q-1)-1$ free parameters, each producing an independent diagnostic; in total there are $N(q)+1$ diagnostics for genuine $q$-partite entanglement. For holographic CFT states, assuming the minimal multiway-cut dual for multi-entropy, the paper computes $GM^{(3)}$, $GM^{(4)}$, and the $q=5$ diagnostics in vacuum AdS$_3$ and finds them nonzero at order $1/G_N$, giving evidence that genuine multipartite entanglement is ubiquitous in holography rather than a rare or fine-tuned feature. The paper also shows these holographic quantities are UV-finite for $q=3,4,5$ and argues that the divergent part of entanglement entropy is therefore bipartite in origin.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is $GM_n^{(q)}$, a symmetric linear combination of $a$-partite Rényi multi-entropies $S_n^{(a)}$ with coefficients fixed by demanding that $GM_n^{(q)}$ vanish on factorized states. The counting identity $N(q)=p(q)-p(q-1)-1$ carries the combinatorial part of the argument: $p(a)$, the number of integer partitions of $a$, enumerates the distinct ways to divide the $q$ subsystems, and the $-1$ accounts for the pure-state identity $S_n^{(1)}=0$, while subtracting $p(q-1)-1$ removes the constraints inherited from $(q-1)$-partite factorizations. On the holographic side, the engine is the minimal multiway-cut proposal $S^{(p)}(R_1:\cdots:R_p)=\frac{1}{4G_N}A^{(p)}(R_1:\cdots:R_p)$, evaluated in vacuum AdS$_3$ where minimal cuts are unions of geodesics meeting only at equiangular trivalent vertices; substituting these areas turns each genuine multi-entropy into an explicit hyperbolic quantity whose UV divergences cancel.

What would settle it

Compute the $n\to 1$ limit of the Rényi multi-entropy directly on the boundary without assuming minimal cuts, for example by replica methods in a free 2d CFT with $q=5$ and five connected subregions, and check whether a genuine multi-entropy diagnostic is $O(1/G_N)$; finding a state where the minimal multiway cut is nontrivial but the diagnostic vanishes, or where the diagnostic is $O(1)$, would disprove Eq. (4.3).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that genuine multipartite entanglement is not captured by a single measure but by a linear family: for any integer $q\ge 3$, the genuine $q$-partite Rényi multi-entropy can be constructed as a symmetric linear combination of $a$-partite multi-entropies, with the combination indexed by the integer partitions of $q$. Imposing that $GM_n^{(q)}$ vanishes on states of the form $|\psi_{q-1}\rangle\otimes|\psi_1\rangle$ fixes $p(q-1)-1$ coefficients and leaves $N(q)=p(q)-p(q-1)-1$ free parameters; varying them gives $N(q)+1$ independent diagnostics that are nonzero only for genuine $q$-partite entanglement. In holography, the paper argues that genuine multi-entropy is generically of order $1/G_N$: in vacuum AdS$_3$, $GM^{(3)}$ equals a constant, $GM^{(4)}|_{a=1/3}$ is a positive function of the conformal cross-ratio, and the $q=5$ diagnostics are nonzero both analytically near equipartition and numerically. The paper's conclusion is that holographic CFT states carry genuine $q$-partite entanglement of order the central charge for all $q\ge 3$, and that this multipartite structure is what makes deep bulk reconstruction possible.

Load-bearing premise

The holographic part of the paper rests on the proposal that holographic multi-entropy equals the area of a minimal multiway cut divided by $4G_N$ after analytically continuing the Rényi index $n$ to 1; the paper explicitly flags in footnote 10 that the Rényi dual has known counterexamples for $n\ge 3$ and that the $n\to 1$ proposal has been validated only in holographic tensor networks and fixed-area states.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any $q\ge 3$, the paper's prescription yields a finite, explicitly constructible list of $N(q)+1$ independent quantities that vanish on all states with entanglement in fewer than $q$ subsystems, so detection of genuine $q$-partite entanglement is reduced to evaluating linear combinations of Rényi multi-entropies.
  • The $q=4$ construction reproduces the known tripartite-information diagnostic $I_3$ as the derivative of $GM^{(4)}$ with respect to its free parameter and adds a second, new quadripartite diagnostic $GM^{(4)}|_{c_2=0}$.
  • In vacuum AdS$_3$, the holographic genuine multi-entropies for $q=3,4,5$ are nonzero at order $1/G_N$, which implies holographic CFT states contain genuine multipartite entanglement whose amount tracks the central charge rather than a subleading correction.
  • The holographic quantities computed for $q=3,4,5$ are independent of the UV cutoff, which the paper argues means the short-distance divergence of multi-entropy is entirely a bipartite-entanglement effect.
  • Because $GM^{(q)}$ is a family of linear combinations of independent diagnostics, no single member of the family has privileged sign or normalization; the paper's black-hole curve shows negative values are consistent with genuine entanglement and should not be read as absence of it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The counting formula implies the number of genuine $q$-partite entanglement diagnostics grows exponentially with $q$, since $p(q)\sim \exp(\pi\sqrt{2q/3})/(4q\sqrt{3})$; for large $q$, no single scalar quantity can summarize genuine multipartite entanglement, so the paper's construction is really an exponentially large family of measures.
  • The paper leaves open a direct boundary computation of $GM^{(q)}$ in a soluble 2d CFT; if such a calculation found a zero for some $q\ge 5$, the holographic ubiquity claim would fail, whereas a nonzero result would be an independent check of the multiway-cut proposal outside tensor-network models.
  • The UV-finiteness result suggests that genuine multi-entropy isolates long-distance multipartite entanglement; a natural extension would be to track $GM^{(q)}$ under an RG flow and test whether it is the invariant piece that survives when short-distance bipartite entanglement is integrated out.
  • The near-zero value of $GM^{(5)}$ before the Page time suggests that genuine multipartite entanglement is hidden when one subsystem dominates; dividing the large subsystem into two should make the minimal multiway cut nontrivial again and restore an $O(1/G_N)$ value, a prediction that can be checked with the paper's formulas.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper generalizes the previous construction of genuine multi-entropy GM(q)_n (arXiv:2502.07995) to arbitrary q by writing it as a symmetric linear combination of Rényi multi-entropies S^(a)_n, with coefficients fixed by requiring vanishing on states that factorize into fewer than q parties. The central technical claims are: (i) the number of free parameters in GM(q)_n is N(q) = p(q) − p(q−1) − 1, where p is the integer partition function; (ii) these free parameters yield N(q)+1 independent diagnostics of genuine q-partite entanglement; (iii) for holographic states in AdS3 vacuum, GM(q) = O(1/G_N) for q = 3,4,5, computed analytically and numerically using the multiway-cut proposal. The paper also derives a new geometric lower bound in Appendix A and argues for UV-finiteness of GM(q) based on explicit cancellations for q = 3,4,5.

Significance. If the general-q prescription is correct, this provides a systematic, partition-number-based framework for constructing genuine multipartite entanglement measures, unifying known quantities (e.g., tripartite information I_3) and generating new diagnostics for arbitrary q. The holographic results, conditional on the multiway-cut/analytic-continuation proposal, give quantitative evidence that genuine multipartite entanglement is ubiquitous in holographic CFTs, and the geometric inequality in Appendix A is a rigorous and new AdS3 result. Strengths of the paper include the explicit and self-consistent constraint algebra worked out for q = 3,4,5, exact analytic expressions for holographic GM(4) and GM(5) in symmetric configurations, a clear geometric proof of the lower bound, and detailed appendices with explicit computations. The main limitations are the unproven linear-independence statement for the constraints at general q and the acknowledged but unproven holographic dual assumption; both are explicitly flagged in the text but are load-bearing for the advertised claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.5.1 and Sec. 3.5.2] The general-q parameter count N(q) = p(q)−p(q−1)−1 and the accompanying claim of N(q)+1 independent diagnostics rest on the assertion that the p(q−1)−1 constraints (imposed by requiring GM(q)_n to vanish on |ψ_{q−1}>⊗|ψ_1>) are linearly independent for every q. The text says only that the constraints are 'easily and straightforwardly constructed' (Sec. 3.5.1) and that the diagnostics are independent 'because we impose the independent p(q−1)−1 constraints' (Sec. 3.5.2). Explicit verification is given only for q = 3,4,5. If two constraints are linearly dependent, the number of free parameters changes; if additional hidden relations exist, the diagnostic count in Eq. (3.68) is wrong. This is an omitted proof of a load-bearing claim for the 'for any q' construction advertised in the abstract. Please provide a proof (e.g., a triangular structure of the constraint matrix) or explicitly restrict the systematic claim to the verified cases q ≤ 5.
  2. [Sec. 4 and footnote 10] The holographic central claim, GM(q) = O(1/G_N) for holographic states (Eq. (4.3)), relies on the proposed identification of holographic multi-entropy with the area of the minimal p-way cut after analytic continuation n→1. Footnote 10 explicitly states that this is a proposal, that there are known counterexamples for the Rényi dual at n ≥ 3 in AdS/CFT, and that validity is argued only via holographic tensor networks and fixed-area states. The abstract and Sec. 5 present the O(1/G_N) results as established, without prominently carrying this caveat. Since the conclusion that genuine multipartite entanglement is ubiquitous in holography is directly conditional on this unproven assumption, the text should state the conditionality in the abstract and in the statement of (4.3), or provide additional evidence for the n→1 continuation for generic holographic states.
  3. [Appendix D and Sec. 5] The UV-finiteness of GM(q) is explicitly demonstrated only for q = 3,4,5, with the text noting 'we currently do not have a proof for generic q' and that it is 'reasonable to believe' that it holds for all q. Nevertheless, Sec. 5 uses this UV-finiteness to conclude that divergent entanglement in QFT ground states is 'always bipartite in nature' via the decomposition (5.3). As written, this inference goes beyond the established cases. Either supply a general-q proof using the constraint structure or recast the bipartiteness statement as a conjecture, to avoid presenting an unproven extrapolation as a conclusion.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.3] The phrase 'we do except the quantity defined in (4.18) to be non-zero' should read 'we do expect'.
  2. [Footnote 10] The word 'absense' should be 'absence'.
  3. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2.11)] The inequality (2.11) is introduced with the assumption that all boundary subregions are connected, but the subsequent remark states that Appendix A proves a stronger version without this assumption. Consider revising the introductory sentence to avoid an apparent contradiction.
  4. [Sec. 5, Eq. (5.3)] The decomposition S(q) = f(GM(q), ..., GM(3)) + g(S(2)) is schematic; specifying the linear coefficients and the domains of f and g would make the claimed 'irreducible representation decomposition' more explicit and checkable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the vanishing property of GM(q) is openly definitional, the holographic results are explicitly conditional on an external proposal, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. GM(q) is explicitly defined by demanding vanishing on lower-partite factorized states (Sec. 2, eq. (2.7), and Sec. 3.1), so the fact that the resulting combinations and their parameter derivatives vanish on such states is a consequence of the definition, not a fitted prediction passed off as a result. The free-parameter count N(q)=p(q)-p(q-1)-1 is an algebraic count of coefficients minus declared constraints; for q=3,4,5 the constraints are solved explicitly, and the general-q step rests on an unproven rank assumption, which is a correctness risk rather than circularity. The holographic O(1/G_N) statements are conditional on the multiway-cut proposal for multi-entropy, attributed to [9,11] and explicitly caveated in footnote 10; the paper does not fit GM(q) values from data nor smuggle in the conclusion via self-citation. Citations to the authors' prior work [1,16,25] are used for background, the q=3,4 construction (re-derived here), and black-hole curve asymptotics, but they are not the load-bearing argument for the new diagnostics or holographic values. No step reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The construction itself relies on purity, the definitional requirement of vanishing on factorized states, and the sufficiency/independence of the constraints. The holographic conclusions additionally rely on the unproven multiway-cut proposal and the tensor-network/fixed-area rescue of the analytic continuation. The only free parameters are the surviving linear-combination coefficients a and b, which are not fitted to data.

free parameters (2)
  • a = c2 (GM^(4) coefficient)
    A real coefficient multiplying S^(2)[2:2] in Eq. (3.30). It survives the vanishing constraints and is not fitted to data; it parameterizes a family of quadripartite measures.
  • b = c5 (GM^(5) coefficient)
    A real coefficient multiplying S^(2)[4:1] in Eq. (3.50). It survives the vanishing constraints and is not fitted to data; it parameterizes a family of pentapartite measures.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The total q-partite state is pure, so S^(1)[q] = 0 and the corresponding coefficient is dropped.
    Used throughout Sec. 3.1 to reduce the number of parameters from p(q)-1 to p(q)-2. Limits the construction to pure total states.
  • domain assumption A genuine q-partite measure must vanish on every state factorizing as |ψ_{q̃}> ⊗ |ψ_{q-q̃}> for q̃ < q.
    This is the defining requirement of genuine multi-entropy, imposed as constraint equations in Sec. 3.1. It is a design choice defining what the measure means, not a theorem.
  • domain assumption For general q, imposing vanishing on |ψ_{q-1}> ⊗ |ψ_1> (together with additivity) is sufficient for vanishing on all lower-partite factorizations, and the resulting constraint equations are independent.
    Invoked in Sec. 3.5 to count N(q). Explicitly verified only for q=3,4,5; independence for all q is asserted rather than proven.
  • domain assumption Holographic multi-entropy S^(p) is given by the area of the minimal p-way cut divided by 4G_N after analytic continuation n to 1.
    Adopted in Sec. 4 from Refs. [9,11] and explicitly flagged in footnote 10 as a proposed dual. Known counterexamples exist for the Renyi dual at n greater than or equal to 3, so all holographic conclusions inherit this assumption.
  • standard math In AdS3, minimal multiway cuts are networks of geodesics meeting only at equiangular trivalent vertices, per the double-bubble theorems of Refs. [15,24].
    Used throughout Sec. 4 and Appendix C to write analytic formulas for minimal multiway cuts in the hyperbolic disk.
  • domain assumption Holographic tensor networks or fixed-area states justify the n-to-1 analytic continuation when the general Renyi proposal fails.
    Invoked in footnote 10 and Sec. 5 to rescue the holographic duality for the states considered. This is an argument from toy models, not a proof for generic holographic states.
invented entities (1)
  • Genuine multi-entropy GM^(q) as a systematic family of measures independent evidence
    purpose: A linear combination of multi-entropies that vanishes on all lower-partite factorized states and is nonzero only for genuine q-partite entanglement.
    Not a new physical object but a new mathematical diagnostic. It has falsifiable handles: predicted vanishing on factorized states, concrete nonzero values on GHZ and other four-qubit states, and computed O(1/G_N) values in AdS3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of More on genuine multi-entropy and holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KZSXJ4IA

@misc{pith2026250416589,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: More on genuine multi-entropy and holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KZSXJ4IA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.16589}
}
abstract

By generalizing the construction of genuine multi-entropy ${\rm GM}[\mathtt{q}]$ for genuine multi-partite entanglement proposed in the previous paper arXiv:2502.07995, we give a prescription on how to construct ${\rm GM}[\mathtt{q}]$ systematically for any $\mathtt{q}$. The crucial point is that our construction naturally fits to the partition number $p(\mathtt{a})$ of integer $\mathtt{a}$. For general $\mathtt{q}$, ${\rm GM}[\mathtt{q}]$ contains $N (\mathtt{q}) = p(\mathtt{q})-p(\mathtt{q}-1)-1$ number of free parameters. Furthermore, these give $N (\mathtt{q})+1$ number of new diagnostics for genuine $\mathtt{q}$-partite entanglement. Especially for $\mathtt{q}=4$ case, this reproduces not only the known diagnostics pointed out by arXiv:1406.2663, but also a new diagnostics for quadripartite entanglement. We also study these ${\rm GM}[\mathtt{q}]$ for $\mathtt{q} = 4, 5$ in holography and show that these are of the order of ${\cal{O}}\left(1/G_N \right)$ both analytically and numerically. Our results give evidence that genuine multipartite entanglement is ubiquitous in holography. We discuss the connection to quantum error correction and the role of genuine multipartite entanglement in bulk reconstruction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tensor invariants for multipartite entanglement classification

    math-ph 2026-04 accept novelty 7.5 of 10

    Trace-invariants of colored graphs fully label LU orbits of HT multipartite states, completely characterize their LO preorder via weight-function divisibility, and yield large-N combinatorial distinctions from Haar-ra...

  2. Typical Output States of Monitored Random Clifford Circuits: A Graph-Theoretic Approach

    quant-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Random stabilizer states are asymptotically Erdos-Renyi graphs, yielding exact GHZ entanglement numbers and revealing a hidden unitary sub-circuit in monitored Clifford circuits.

  3. From Multipartite Entanglement to TQFT

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Genuine multipartite entanglement of a gapped ground state is conjectured and, for Levin-Wen models, shown to reproduce the TQFT partition function on any 3-manifold.

  4. Multi-entropy and the Dihedral Measures at Quantum Critical Points

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The multi-entropy excess κ_2^(3) vanishes for the massless free scalar CFT, an exception to the general c/4 log 2 result, while the Ising model matches it, and new n=3 and n=4 values are proposed for the scalar theory.

  5. Holographic multipartite entanglement dynamics in AdS$_3$-Vaidya

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    During a holographic global quench, multipartite entanglement's spatial range first expands then contracts, with higher-party entanglement relaxing later, while some tripartite signals persist or return to vacuum values.

  6. Notes on the Graph-Encoded Manifolds for the (Genuine) Multi-Entropy

    hep-th 2026-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    For q=4 multi-entropy, every vertex link of the contraction graph has Euler characteristic n(3-n), so the graph encodes a smooth 3-manifold exactly at n=2 and develops conical singularities for all n≥3.

  7. Operational meaning of Markov gap in tripartite entanglement of quantum dynamics

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Irreducible tripartite entanglement in free-fermion chains saturates on a slow t~L^2 timescale and its Markov gap value tracks the number of 'essential tripartite fermions' defined via a null matrix.

  8. Genuine Multi-Entropy in the Toric Code

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Genuine multi-entropy in the toric code reduces to topological entanglement entropy for stabilizer states at low replica index but captures independent topological data at n=4 and for non-stabilizer states.

  9. Black hole as a multipartite entangler: multi-entropy in AdS${}_3$/CFT${}_2$

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In pure BTZ black-hole states the genuine tripartite multi-entropy grows linearly with subsystem size at high temperature (volume law), peaks at (1/6) of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy plus a universal constant, and c...

  10. Multipartite entanglement characterizing topological phase transitions in holographic nodal line semimetals

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Tripartite entanglement measures in holographic nodal line semimetals vanish at long distance but decay with phase-dependent power laws that jump at the quantum critical point.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 10 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Iizuka and M

    N. Iizuka and M. Nishida,Genuine multi-entropy and holography,2502.07995

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Hayden, A. Maloney, D. Marolf and S. F. Ross,Multiboundary Wormholes and Holographic Entanglement,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 185015, [1406.2663]

    arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602, [hep-th/0603001]

    arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    Akers and P

    C. Akers and P. Rath,Entanglement Wedge Cross Sections Require Tripartite Entanglement, JHEP04(2020) 208, [1911.07852]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Hayden, O

    P. Hayden, O. Parrikar and J. Sorce,The Markov gap for geometric reflected entropy,JHEP 10(2021) 047, [2107.00009]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    S. X. Cui, P. Hayden, T. He, M. Headrick, B. Stoica and M. Walter,Bit Threads and Holographic Monogamy,Commun. Math. Phys.376(2019) 609–648, [1808.05234]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    M. J. Donald, M. Horodecki and O. Rudolph,The uniqueness theorem for entanglement measures,Journal of Mathematical Physics43(2002) 4252–4272, [quant-ph/0105017]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  8. [8]

    Walter, D

    M. Walter, D. Gross and J. Eisert,Multi-partite entanglement,1612.02437

    arXiv

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Gadde, V

    A. Gadde, V. Krishna and T. Sharma,New multipartite entanglement measure and its holographic dual,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 126001, [2206.09723]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Penington, M

    G. Penington, M. Walter and F. Witteveen,Fun with replicas: tripartitions in tensor networks and gravity,JHEP05(2023) 008, [2211.16045]. – 53 –

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Gadde, V

    A. Gadde, V. Krishna and T. Sharma,Towards a classification of holographic multi-partite entanglement measures,JHEP08(2023) 202, [2304.06082]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Gadde, S

    A. Gadde, S. Jain, V. Krishna, H. Kulkarni and T. Sharma,Monotonicity conjecture for multi-party entanglement. Part I,JHEP02(2024) 025, [2308.16247]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Harper, T

    J. Harper, T. Takayanagi and T. Tsuda,Multi-entropy at low Renyi index in 2d CFTs, SciPost Phys.16(2024) 125, [2401.04236]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    B. Liu, J. Zhang, S. Ohyama, Y. Kusuki and S. Ryu,Multi wavefunction overlap and multi entropy for topological ground states in (2+1) dimensions,2410.08284

  7. [15]

    Hutchings, F

    M. Hutchings, F. Morgan, M. Ritor´ e and A. Ros,Proof of the double bubble conjecture, Annals of Mathematics155(2002) 459–489

    2002

  8. [16]

    Iizuka, S

    N. Iizuka, S. Lin and M. Nishida,Black hole multi-entropy curves — secret entanglement between Hawking particles,JHEP03(2025) 037, [2412.07549]

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    G. H. Hardy and S. Ramanujan,Asymptotic Formulaae in Combinatory Analysis,Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s2-17(1918) 75–115

    1918

  10. [18]

    W. Dur, G. Vidal and J. I. Cirac,Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways, Phys. Rev. A62(2000) 062314, [quant-ph/0005115]

    2000 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Hayden, S

    P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter and Z. Yang,Holographic duality from random tensor networks,JHEP11(2016) 009, [1601.01694]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Pastawski, B

    F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill,Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence,JHEP06(2015) 149, [1503.06237]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Akers and P

    C. Akers and P. Rath,Holographic Renyi Entropy from Quantum Error Correction,JHEP 05(2019) 052, [1811.05171]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    X. Dong, D. Harlow and D. Marolf,Flat entanglement spectra in fixed-area states of quantum gravity,JHEP10(2019) 240, [1811.05382]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Gadde, J

    A. Gadde, J. Harper and V. Krishna,Multi-invariants and Bulk Replica Symmetry, 2411.00935

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Cotton and D

    A. Cotton and D. Freeman,The double bubble problem in spherical and hyperbolic space, International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences32(2002) 189517

    2002

  17. [25]

    Iizuka, S

    N. Iizuka, S. Lin and M. Nishida,Why many-partite entanglement is essential for holography, 2504.01625

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Hayden, M

    P. Hayden, M. Headrick and A. Maloney,Holographic Mutual Information is Monogamous, Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 046003, [1107.2940]

    2013 arXiv

  19. [27]

    N. Bao, S. Nezami, H. Ooguri, B. Stoica, J. Sully and M. Walter,The Holographic Entropy Cone,JHEP09(2015) 130, [1505.07839]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Almheiri, X

    A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow,Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT,JHEP04(2015) 163, [1411.7041]. – 54 –

    2015 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Grassl, T

    M. Grassl, T. Beth and T. Pellizzari,Codes for the quantum erasure channel,Phys. Rev. A 56(1997) 33, [quant-ph/9610042]

    1997 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Laflamme, C

    R. Laflamme, C. Miquel, J. P. Paz and W. H. Zurek,Perfect Quantum Error Correcting Code,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 198, [quant-ph/9602019]

    1996 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Susskind and E

    L. Susskind and E. Witten,The Holographic bound in anti-de Sitter space,hep-th/9805114

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    de Boer,The Holographic renormalization group,Fortsch

    J. de Boer,The Holographic renormalization group,Fortsch. Phys.49(2001) 339–358, [hep-th/0101026]

    2001 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Heemskerk and J

    I. Heemskerk and J. Polchinski,Holographic and Wilsonian Renormalization Groups,JHEP 06(2011) 031, [1010.1264]

    2011 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Gadde, S

    A. Gadde, S. Jain and H. Kulkarni,Multi-partite entanglement monotones,2406.17447

  27. [35]

    J. M. Maldacena,Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,JHEP04(2003) 021, [hep-th/0106112]

    2003 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Skenderis and B

    K. Skenderis and B. C. van Rees,Holography and wormholes in 2+1 dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.301(2011) 583–626, [0912.2090]

    2011 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Marolf, H

    D. Marolf, H. Maxfield, A. Peach and S. F. Ross,Hot multiboundary wormholes from bipartite entanglement,Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 215006, [1506.04128]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Anegawa, N

    T. Anegawa, N. Iizuka, K. Tamaoka and T. Ugajin,Wormholes and holographic decoherence, JHEP03(2021) 214, [2012.03514]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Emparan, B

    R. Emparan, B. Grado-White, D. Marolf and M. Tomasevic,Multi-mouth Traversable Wormholes,JHEP05(2021) 032, [2012.07821]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Balasubramanian, M

    V. Balasubramanian, M. J. Kang, C. Murdia and S. F. Ross,Signals of multiparty entanglement and holography,2411.03422

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Fenchel,Elementary Geometry in Hyperbolic Space

    W. Fenchel,Elementary Geometry in Hyperbolic Space. De Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1989, doi:10.1515/9783110849455

    1989 doi

  34. [42]

    Enr´ ıquez, I

    M. Enr´ ıquez, I. Wintrowicz and K. ˙Zyczkowski,Maximally entangled multipartite states: A brief survey,Journal of Physics: Conference Series698(mar, 2016) 012003

    2016

  35. [43]

    Iizuka, A

    N. Iizuka, A. Mukherjee, S. K. Sake and N. Zenoni,Multipartite information in sparse SYK models,2409.16641. – 55 –

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.