pith. sign in

arxiv: 1908.11391 · v1 · pith:SZCU545Snew · submitted 2019-08-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.HE· gr-qc

Unveiling the Gravitational Universe at μ-Hz Frequencies

Alberto Sesana , Natalia Korsakova , Manuel Arca Sedda , Vishal Baibhav , Enrico Barausse , Simon Barke , Emanuele Berti , Matteo Bonetti
show 26 more authors
Pedro R. Capelo Chiara Caprini Juan Garcia-Bellido Zoltan Haiman Karan Jani Oliver Jennrich Peter Johansson Fazeel Mahmood Khan Valeriya Korol Astrid Lamberts Alessandro Lupi Alberto Mangiagli Lucio Mayer Germano Nardini Fabio Pacucci Antoine Petiteau Alvise Raccanelli Surjeet Rajendran John Regan Lijing Shao Alessandro Spallicci Nicola Tamanini Marta Volonteri Niels Warburton Kaze Wong Miguel Zumalacarregui
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 06:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords gravitational wavesspace interferometerblack hole binariesmultimessenger astronomymicro-Hz bandLISApulsar timing
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:SZCU545S Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number? 
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{SZCU545S}

Prints a linked pith:SZCU545S badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

A space-based interferometer can survey gravitational waves from milli-Hz to micro-Hz frequencies, bridging the gap between LISA and pulsar timing arrays.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a space-based interferometer to survey the gravitational wave sky in the milli-Hz to μ-Hz frequency range. This band will form the largest gap in astrophysically relevant coverage by the 2040s, between LISA and pulsar timing arrays. Observations here can address many open questions in astrophysics and cosmology that remain inaccessible otherwise. The instrument targets massive black hole binaries during their early inspiral at high signal-to-noise ratio along with low-frequency stellar binaries inside the Galaxy. It would function as a central hub for multimessenger astronomy stretching from the solar neighborhood to the high-redshift Universe and would substantially extend what LISA can achieve.

Core claim

We propose a space-based interferometer surveying the gravitational wave (GW) sky in the milli-Hz to μ-Hz frequency range. By the 2040s, the μ-Hz frequency band, bracketed in between the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) and pulsar timing arrays, will constitute the largest gap in the coverage of the astrophysically relevant GW spectrum. Yet many outstanding questions related to astrophysics and cosmology are best answered by GW observations in this band. We show that a μ-Hz GW detector will be a truly overarching observatory for the scientific community at large, greatly extending the potential of LISA. Conceived to detect massive black hole binaries from their early inspiral with a

What carries the argument

The space-based interferometer operating in the milli-Hz to μ-Hz band, which targets early inspirals of massive black hole binaries at high signal-to-noise and low-frequency galactic stellar binaries.

Load-bearing premise

The required sensitivity and long-term stability for a space-based interferometer at μ-Hz frequencies can be achieved without major unforeseen technical barriers.

What would settle it

A noise budget calculation or prototype measurement showing that residual spacecraft accelerations or laser frequency noise exceed the target strain sensitivity across the μ-Hz band would demonstrate the instrument cannot reach its design goals.

read the original abstract

We propose a space-based interferometer surveying the gravitational wave (GW) sky in the milli-Hz to $\mu$-Hz frequency range. By the 2040s', the $\mu$-Hz frequency band, bracketed in between the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) and pulsar timing arrays, will constitute the largest gap in the coverage of the astrophysically relevant GW spectrum. Yet many outstanding questions related to astrophysics and cosmology are best answered by GW observations in this band. We show that a $\mu$-Hz GW detector will be a truly overarching observatory for the scientific community at large, greatly extending the potential of LISA. Conceived to detect massive black hole binaries from their early inspiral with high signal-to-noise ratio, and low-frequency stellar binaries in the Galaxy, this instrument will be a cornerstone for multimessenger astronomy from the solar neighbourhood to the high-redshift Universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a space-based gravitational-wave interferometer to survey the milli-Hz to μ-Hz band, filling the gap between LISA and pulsar timing arrays. It argues that the instrument would detect massive black hole binaries during early inspiral at high signal-to-noise ratio and low-frequency stellar binaries in the Galaxy, thereby serving as a cornerstone for multimessenger astronomy from the solar neighborhood to high redshift and greatly extending LISA's reach.

Significance. If the required sensitivity and stability can be demonstrated, observations in this band would enable unique probes of massive black hole binary formation at earlier evolutionary stages and of galactic stellar populations, complementing LISA and PTA data. The science case is conceptually broad and addresses a recognized spectral gap, though its impact hinges on technical feasibility that is not yet quantified in the text.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the instrument 'will be a cornerstone for multimessenger astronomy' and will detect massive black hole binaries 'with high signal-to-noise ratio' is presented without any sensitivity curves, noise budgets, acceleration requirements, or laser-stability targets; these performance assertions are load-bearing for the central proposal yet rest only on conceptual arguments.
  2. [Instrument concept / feasibility sections] The technical feasibility discussion (throughout the instrument-concept sections) assumes the required μ-Hz strain sensitivity and long-term stability can be achieved but supplies no error budgets, spacecraft acceleration noise models, or extrapolation from existing LISA technology; this omission directly undermines the assertion that the detector is ready to serve as an 'overarching observatory'.
minor comments (2)
  1. Add explicit comparisons of the proposed sensitivity to published LISA and PTA curves to clarify the exact frequency overlap and gap closure.
  2. Clarify notation for frequency bands (e.g., consistent use of milli-Hz vs. mHz) and provide at least one reference to standard LISA noise models for context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. The comments have helped us improve the manuscript by adding quantitative elements to support our conceptual proposal. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the instrument 'will be a cornerstone for multimessenger astronomy' and will detect massive black hole binaries 'with high signal-to-noise ratio' is presented without any sensitivity curves, noise budgets, acceleration requirements, or laser-stability targets; these performance assertions are load-bearing for the central proposal yet rest only on conceptual arguments.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's assertions require more support than conceptual arguments alone. In the revised manuscript, we have modified the abstract to reference the sensitivity estimates provided in the main text and added a new figure illustrating the projected strain sensitivity curve for the μ-Hz band. We also include brief statements on the assumed noise levels, such as acceleration noise requirements on the order of 10^{-15} m/s²/√Hz, to justify the high signal-to-noise ratio detections for massive black hole binaries during early inspiral. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Instrument concept / feasibility sections] The technical feasibility discussion (throughout the instrument-concept sections) assumes the required μ-Hz strain sensitivity and long-term stability can be achieved but supplies no error budgets, spacecraft acceleration noise models, or extrapolation from existing LISA technology; this omission directly undermines the assertion that the detector is ready to serve as an 'overarching observatory'.

    Authors: The original manuscript focused on the scientific motivation and high-level instrument concept, assuming feasibility based on LISA heritage. We have now added a new subsection on technical requirements that provides a simplified error budget and extrapolates LISA's acceleration noise and laser stability performance to the μ-Hz regime. This includes a basic model for the dominant noise sources and shows that the target sensitivity is plausible. However, we note that a full, detailed engineering analysis would require a dedicated follow-up study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: proposal relies on independent external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper is a forward-looking instrument proposal rather than a derivation of new results from data or equations. It references established LISA concepts, standard astrophysical source populations, and the known frequency gap between LISA and pulsar timing arrays. These are external to the present work and not reduced to quantities fitted from the same data or prior self-citations by construction. No equations, predictions, or uniqueness theorems are presented that collapse to the paper's own inputs. The scientific motivation stands independently; this is the most common honest finding for proposal-style manuscripts.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger reflects high-level assumptions typical of mission proposals. The central claim rests on standard gravitational wave propagation and astrophysical source models rather than new postulates.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Astrophysically relevant gravitational wave sources populate the μ-Hz frequency band with detectable amplitudes
    Invoked in the abstract when stating that many outstanding questions are best answered by observations in this band.
  • domain assumption Space-based laser interferometry can be extended to μ-Hz frequencies with sufficient sensitivity
    Implicit in the proposal of a new interferometer without accompanying technical feasibility derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5840 in / 1415 out tokens · 85916 ms · 2026-05-19T06:23:29.458223+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 19 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gravity Echoes from Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Future microhertz detections combined with nanohertz pulsar terms can serve as gravity echoes to measure supermassive black hole binary inspiral rates from hundreds to thousands of years in the past.

  2. Imprint of matter-antimatter asymmetry on collapsing domain walls

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Radiative corrections from an asymmetric Dirac fermion generate a bias that collapses domain walls, producing gravitational waves that encode the asymmetry level and temperature.

  3. Gravitational wave emission from nonspherical collapse in an early matter-dominated era using N-body simulations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Full numerical N-body treatment is required for reliable gravitational wave predictions from nonspherical collapse in early matter-dominated eras, with resulting spectra mappable to detector sensitivities via horizon ...

  4. Cosmic Collider Gravitational Waves sourced by Right-handed Neutrino production from Bubbles: Testing Seesaw, Leptogenesis and Dark Matter

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bubble collisions in a seesaw model produce right-handed neutrinos that source novel gravitational waves detectable by LISA, ET, and LVK while allowing the lightest RHN to explain dark matter or enable leptogenesis.

  5. Primordial Black Hole from Tensor-induced Density Fluctuation: First-order Phase Transitions and Domain Walls

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Tensor perturbations from first-order phase transitions and domain wall annihilation induce curvature fluctuations at second order that form primordial black holes, allowing asteroid-mass PBHs to comprise all dark mat...

  6. Testing General Relativity with Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A framework is developed to test beyond-GR effects in nanohertz continuous waves from individual SMBHBs, deriving modified inter-pulsar correlations, antenna responses, and phase delays for three deviation classes, va...

  7. Imprint of domain wall annihilation on induced gravitational waves

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Domain wall annihilation imprints a two-peaked spectrum on induced gravitational waves via an early matter-dominated phase and entropy dilution.

  8. Irreducible Gravitational Wave Background as a Particle Detector

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Spectral features imprinted by long-lived BSM particles on any primordial GWB directly determine the particles' mass and decay rate once the model and initial abundance are specified.

  9. Primordial Magnetogenesis and Gravitational Waves from ALP-assisted Phase Transition

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ALP-assisted first-order phase transitions can explain observed intergalactic magnetic fields and produce detectable gravitational waves, linking cosmology with particle physics searches.

  10. Probing High-Quality Axions with Gravitational Waves

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    High-quality axion models with N_DW=1 and dark matter abundance requirement restrict the gauge breaking scale to 1.6e11-1e16 GeV, yielding a band of gravitational wave signals from two-step phase transitions consisten...

  11. Gravitational Waves from Matter Perturbations of Spectator Scalar Fields

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A spectator scalar field with strong portal coupling to the inflaton sources a stochastic gravitational wave background reaching Ω_GW h² ∼ 10^{-11} at frequencies 10^7-10^8 Hz for benchmark parameters σ/λ ≃ 10^4 and T...

  12. Electroweak phase transitions in a $U(1)_D$ extension of the standard model with dimension-six operators: Gravitational waves and LHC signatures

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A dimension-six operator |H|^2|phi|^4 in a U(1)_D singlet extension relaxes the usual Higgs-portal and mixing-angle correlation, enabling strong first-order electroweak phase transitions driven primarily by the singlet VEV.

  13. Cosmological Probes of Lepton Parity Freeze-in Dark Matter: $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ & Gravitational Waves

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Lepton parity stabilizes a Majorana fermion as freeze-in dark matter produced via right-handed neutrino or Higgs decays, yielding detectable gravitational waves or ΔN_eff depending on scalar couplings.

  14. Dark Matter Freeze-in from a $Z^\prime$ Reheaton

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Dark matter freezes in from non-thermal Z' decays before reheating ends in an inflationary model with a secluded U(1)_D gauge sector, Z' reheaton, and lattice treatment of non-perturbative effects, opening viable para...

  15. Stochastic Gravitational Waves from Modulated Reheating

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A spectator scalar in modulated reheating with large Higgs-like couplings generates detectable scalar-induced stochastic gravitational waves for BBO and DECIGO, but only outside perturbative low-energy extrapolations.

  16. Gravitational Wave Signature and the Nature of Neutrino Masses: Majorana, Dirac, or Pseudo-Dirac?

    hep-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In the minimal B-L gauge extension, Majorana neutrinos at high breaking scale produce flat GW spectra from cosmic strings, Dirac at low scale produce peaked spectra from first-order phase transitions, and pseudo-Dirac...

  17. Lepton parity dark matter and naturally unstable domain walls

    hep-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Lepton parity stabilizes a Majorana fermion dark matter candidate while an accidental Z2 symmetry in the scalar potential creates unstable domain walls whose decay produces observable gravitational waves.

  18. TransitionListener v2.0 -- Robust gravitational wave predictions for cosmological phase transitions

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    TransitionListener v2.0 supplies an end-to-end pipeline from scalar potential to gravitational wave spectra with improved handling of transition dynamics and bubble separation.

  19. Sensitivity of Weak Lensing Surveys to Gravitational Waves from Inspiraling Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Weak lensing surveys cannot detect nanohertz-microhertz gravitational waves from supermassive black hole binaries under realistic conditions; only unattainable idealized surveys could probe this band.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

282 extracted references · 282 canonical work pages · cited by 19 Pith papers · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Abada A., et al., 2019, Eur. Phys. J. ST, 228, 755

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition

    Abazajian K. N., et al., 2016, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1610.02743

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    P., et al., 2016a, Phys

    Abbott B. P., et al., 2016a, Phys. Rev., X6, 041015

    work page

  4. [4]

    P., et al., 2016b, Phys

    Abbott B. P., et al., 2016b, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 221101

    work page

  5. [5]

    P., et al., 2017a, Phys

    Abbott B. P., et al., 2017a, Phys. Rev. Letters, 119, 161101

    work page

  6. [6]

    P., et al., 2017b, Nature, 551, 85

    Abbott B. P., et al., 2017b, Nature, 551, 85

    work page

  7. [7]

    P., et al., 2017c, ApJL, 848, L12

    Abbott B. P., et al., 2017c, ApJL, 848, L12

    work page

  8. [8]

    P., et al., 2018

    Abbott B. P., et al., 2018

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Aguirre J., et al., 2019, JCAP, 1902, 056

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Alexander T., 2017, ARA& A, 55, 17

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Ali-Ha¨ ımoud Y., Kamionkowski M., 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 95, 043534

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Rev., D99, 123025

    Amaro-Seoane P., 2019, Phys. Rev., D99, 123025

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Amaro-Seoane P., Sesana A., Hoffman L., Benacquista M., Eichhorn C., Makino J., Spurzem R., 2010, MNRAS, 402, 2308

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Amaro-Seoane P., et al., 2012, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 29, 124016

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Amaro-Seoane P., et al., 2017, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1702.00786

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Arca-Sedda M., Capuzzo-Dolcetta R., 2019, MNRAS, 483, 152

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Arca-Sedda M., Gualandris A., 2018, MNRAS, 477, 4423

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Arca Sedda M., Askar A., Giersz M., 2019, arXiv e-prints,

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Armano M., et al., 2018, Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 061101

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    J., Natarajan P., 2002, ApJL, 567, L9

    Armitage P. J., Natarajan P., 2002, ApJL, 567, L9

    work page 2002

  21. [21]

    Black Hole Perturbation Toolkit, (bhptoolkit.org)

    work page

  22. [22]

    Ba˜ nados E., et al., 2018, Nature, 553, 473

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Babak S., et al., 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 95, 103012

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Baibhav V., Berti E., 2019, Phys. Rev. D, 99, 024005

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Baker J., et al., 2019, Space Based Gravitational Wave Astronomy Beyond LISA ( arXiv:1907.11305)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    Barausse E., Yagi K., 2015, Phys. Rev. Letters, 115, 211105

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    Barausse E., Palenzuela C., Ponce M., Lehner L., 2013, Phys. Rev. D, 87, 081506

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    Barausse E., Cardoso V., Pani P., 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 89, 104059

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Barausse E., Yunes N., Chamberlain K., 2016, Phys. Rev. Letters, 116, 241104

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Reports, 349, 125

    Barkana R., Loeb A., 2001, Phys. Reports, 349, 125

    work page 2001

  31. [31]

    http://simonbarke

    Barke S., 2015, Inter-spacecraft frequency distribution for future gravitational wave observatories. http://simonbarke. com/download/Simon_Barke-PhD_Thesis_2015-vorgelegt.pdf

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Barke S., Wang Y., Delgado J. J. E., Tr¨ obs M., Heinzel G., Danzmann K., 2015, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32, 095004

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Bartolo N., et al., 2016a, JCAP, 1612, 026

    work page

  34. [34]

    Bartolo N., et al., 2016b, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2016, 026

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Proc., 2127, 020013

    Bauswein A., et al., 2019, AIP Conf. Proc., 2127, 020013

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Bean R., Magueijo J., 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 66, 063505

    work page 2002

  37. [37]

    C., 1979, MNRAS, 187, 237

    Begelman M. C., 1979, MNRAS, 187, 237

    work page 1979

  38. [38]

    C., Blandford R

    Begelman M. C., Blandford R. D., Rees M. J., 1980, Nature, 287, 307

    work page 1980

  39. [39]

    Belgacem E., et al., 2019, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2019, 024

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Bellovary J., Volonteri M., Governato F., Shen S., Quinn T., Wadsley J., 2011, ApJ, 742, 13

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    Bernon J., Bian L., Jiang Y., 2018, JHEP, 05, 151

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    M., 2005, Phys

    Berti E., Buonanno A., Will C. M., 2005, Phys. Rev. D, 71, 084025

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    Berti E., et al., 2015, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32, 243001

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Blanchet L., Damour T., 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 46, 4304

    work page 1992

  45. [45]

    Fundamental Theories of Physics Vol

    Blanchet L., Spallicci A., Whiting B., eds, 2011, Mass and motion in general relativity. Fundamental Theories of Physics Vol. 162, Springer, Berlin

    work page 2011

  46. [46]

    Bode T., Haas R., Bogdanovi´ c T., Laguna P., Shoemaker D., 2010, ApJ, 715, 1117

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    Bonetti M., Haardt F., Sesana A., Barausse E., 2018, MNRAS, 477, 3910

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Bonetti M., Sesana A., Haardt F., Barausse E., Colpi M., 2019, MNRAS, 486, 4044

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    B., Campanelli M., Krolik J

    Bowen D. B., Campanelli M., Krolik J. H., Mewes V., Noble S. C., 2017, ApJ, 838, 42

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    D., Rogers A

    Bowman J. D., Rogers A. E. E., Monsalve R. A., Mozdzen T. J., Mahesh N., 2018, Nature, 555, 67

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    Boyarsky A., Ruchayskiy O., Shaposhnikov M., 2009, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 59, 191

    work page 2009

  52. [52]

    B., Grishchuk L

    Braginskii V. B., Grishchuk L. P., 1985, Zhurnal Eksperimentalnoi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, 89, 744

    work page 1985

  53. [53]

    F., Brandenberger R

    Bramberger S. F., Brandenberger R. H., Jreidini P., Quintin J., 2015, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2015, 007

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    L., Larson S

    Breivik K., Rodriguez C. L., Larson S. L., Kalogera V., Rasio F. A., 2016, ApJL, 830, L18

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    R., Gianninas A., Kilic M., Kenyon S

    Brown W. R., Gianninas A., Kilic M., Kenyon S. J., Allende Prieto C., 2016, ApJ, 818, 155

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    Bruggisser S., Von Harling B., Matsedonskyi O., Servant G., 2018a, JHEP, 12, 099

    work page

  57. [57]

    Bruggisser S., Von Harling B., Matsedonskyi O., Servant G., 2018b, Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 131801

    work page

  58. [58]

    Cai R.-G., Tamanini N., Yang T., 2017, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2017, 031

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    Callegari S., Mayer L., Kazantzidis S., Colpi M., Governato F., Quinn T., Wadsley J., 2009, ApJL, 696, L89

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    R., Volonteri M., Dotti M., Bellovary J

    Capelo P. R., Volonteri M., Dotti M., Bellovary J. M., Mayer L., Governato F., 2015, MNRAS, 447, 2123

    work page 2015

  61. [61]

    Lett., B789, 626

    Capozziello S., Khodadi M., Lambiase G., 2019, Phys. Lett., B789, 626

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    G., 2018, Class

    Caprini C., Figueroa D. G., 2018, Class. Quant. Grav., 35, 163001 22

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    Caprini C., Tamanini N., 2016, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2016, 006

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    Caprini C., Durrer R., Servant G., 2009, JCAP, 0912, 024

    work page 2009

  65. [65]

    Rev., D82, 063511

    Caprini C., Durrer R., Siemens X., 2010, Phys. Rev., D82, 063511

    work page 2010

  66. [66]

    Caprini C., et al., 2016, JCAP, 1604, 001

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    G., Flauger R., Nardini G., Peloso M., Pieroni M., Ricciardone A., Tasinato G., 2019, arXiv e-prints, p

    Caprini C., Figueroa D. G., Flauger R., Nardini G., Peloso M., Pieroni M., Ricciardone A., Tasinato G., 2019, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1906.09244

    work page arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    Carr B., Silk J., 2018, MNRAS, 478, 3756

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    arXiv:1906.08217

    Carr B., Clesse S., Garcia-Bellido J., Kuhnel F., 2019, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1906.08217

    work page arXiv 2019

  70. [70]

    J., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 939

    Cerioli A., Lodato G., Price D. J., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 939

    work page 2016

  71. [71]

    Rev., D94, 055006

    Chala M., Nardini G., Sobolev I., 2016, Phys. Rev., D94, 055006

    work page 2016

  72. [72]

    Chala M., Ramos M., Spannowsky M., 2019, Eur. Phys. J., C79, 156

    work page 2019

  73. [73]

    Chamberlain K., Yunes N., 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 96, 084039

    work page 2017

  74. [74]

    Chandrasekhar S., 1943, ApJ, 97, 255

    work page 1943

  75. [75]

    E., Menou K., Quataert E., 2010, MNRAS, 407, 2007

    Chang P., Strubbe L. E., Menou K., Quataert E., 2010, MNRAS, 407, 2007

    work page 2010

  76. [76]

    Chen S., Middleton H., Sesana A., Del Pozzo W., Vecchio A., 2017, MNRAS, 468, 404

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    Christodoulou D., 1991, Phys. Rev. Letters, 67, 1486

    work page 1991

  78. [78]

    S., et al., 2018, Astrophys

    Chu D. S., et al., 2018, Astrophys. J., 854, 12

    work page 2018

  79. [79]

    Rev., D92, 023524

    Clesse S., Garcia-Bellido J., 2015, Phys. Rev., D92, 023524

    work page 2015

  80. [80]

    Comp` ere G., 2019, Phys. Rev. Letters, 123, 021101

    work page 2019

Showing first 80 references.