REVIEW 8 cited by
Self-Organized Agents: A LLM Multi-Agent Framework toward Ultra Large-Scale Code Generation and Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in automatic code generation using large language model (LLM) agent have brought us closer to the future of automated software development. However, existing single-agent approaches face limitations in generating and improving large-scale, complex codebases due to constraints in context length. To tackle this challenge, we propose Self-Organized multi-Agent framework (SoA), a novel multi-agent framework that enables the scalable and efficient generation and optimization of large-scale code. In SoA, self-organized agents operate independently to generate and modify code components while seamlessly collaborating to construct the overall codebase. A key feature of our framework is the automatic multiplication of agents based on problem complexity, allowing for dynamic scalability. This enables the overall code volume to be increased indefinitely according to the number of agents, while the amount of code managed by each agent remains constant. We evaluate SoA on the HumanEval benchmark and demonstrate that, compared to a single-agent system, each agent in SoA handles significantly less code, yet the overall generated code is substantially greater. Moreover, SoA surpasses the powerful single-agent baseline by 5% in terms of Pass@1 accuracy.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
AgentRadio: Passive Awareness for Long-Horizon Multi-Agent Collaboration
Background mention-waiting lets four Claude Code agents share discoveries mid-execution and reach 62.1% on SWE-Atlas QnA versus 32.3% for one agent.
-
ValueFlow: Measuring the Propagation of Value Perturbations in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
A perturbation-based framework measures how value opinions propagate through multi-agent LLM systems, revealing that susceptibility varies by value, model, and topology.
-
Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities of AI-assisted Codebase Generation
Developers prompting codebase-level AI assistants are often dissatisfied with generated code, citing missing functionality, poor code quality, and communication gaps, despite varied prompting strategies.
-
MasHost Builds It All: Autonomous Multi-Agent System Directed by Reinforcement Learning
MasHost uses reinforcement learning to autonomously construct query-adaptive multi-agent graphs, and its authors report the best average accuracy across six LLM benchmarks.
-
Adaptive Graph Pruning for Multi-Agent Communication
AGP trains a graph neural network to jointly decide which agents to keep and how strongly they should communicate, and reports state-of-the-art average accuracy across six LLM benchmarks with large token savings.
-
Understanding the Information Propagation Effects of Communication Topologies in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
Moderately sparse communication topologies balance error suppression and insight propagation in LLM multi-agent systems, and the proposed EIB-Learner learns such topologies to outperform prior methods.
-
Efficient Code Analysis via Graph Representation Learning-Guided Large Language Models
A GNN selects suspicious subgraphs of a Python project and an LLM judges only those subgraphs, beating direct whole-project LLM analysis on PyPI malware benchmarks.
-
Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI
A qualitative taxonomy positions vibe coding and agentic coding as complementary paradigms rather than rivals in AI-assisted software development.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.