REVIEW 18 cited by
AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents
read the original abstract
Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) as general-purpose agents is essential for understanding their capabilities and facilitating their integration into practical applications. However, the evaluation process presents substantial challenges. A primary obstacle is the benchmarking of agent performance across diverse scenarios within a unified framework, especially in maintaining partially-observable environments and ensuring multi-round interactions. Moreover, current evaluation frameworks mostly focus on the final success rate, revealing few insights during the process and failing to provide a deep understanding of the model abilities. To address these challenges, we introduce AgentBoard, a pioneering comprehensive benchmark and accompanied open-source evaluation framework tailored to analytical evaluation of LLM agents. AgentBoard offers a fine-grained progress rate metric that captures incremental advancements as well as a comprehensive evaluation toolkit that features easy assessment of agents for multi-faceted analysis. This not only sheds light on the capabilities and limitations of LLM agents but also propels the interpretability of their performance to the forefront. Ultimately, AgentBoard serves as a step towards demystifying agent behaviors and accelerating the development of stronger LLM agents.
Forward citations
Cited by 18 Pith papers
-
OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments
OSWorld provides the first unified real-computer benchmark for open-ended multimodal agent tasks, exposing large performance gaps between humans and state-of-the-art LLM/VLM agents.
-
Layer-Isolated Evaluation: Gating the Deterministic Scaffold of a Production LLM Agent with a No-LLM, Regression-Locked Test Harness
Layer-isolated evaluation decomposes LLM agents into per-layer deterministic no-LLM test slices whose locked baselines localize regressions that aggregate pass rates mask.
-
AutoMedBench: Towards Medical AutoResearch with Agentic AI Models
AutoMedBench evaluates AI agents on long-horizon medical workflows across five stages and finds validation and submission as dominant failure points based on thousands of runs.
-
EngiAI: A Multi-Agent Framework and Benchmark Suite for LLM-Driven Engineering Design
EngiAI introduces a LangGraph-based multi-agent framework and a three-part benchmark suite for LLM-driven engineering design, reporting high task completion rates for proprietary models on Beams2D and Photonics2D problems.
-
Holistic Evaluation and Failure Diagnosis of AI Agents
A span-decomposed evaluation framework for AI agents achieves state-of-the-art results on GAIA and SWE-Bench with up to 3.5x gains in localization accuracy by breaking traces into independent per-span judgments.
-
Sell More, Play Less: Benchmarking LLM Realistic Selling Skill
SalesLLM provides an automatic evaluation framework for LLM sales dialogues that correlates 0.98 with human experts and shows top models approaching human performance while weaker ones lag.
-
Evo-Memory: Benchmarking LLM Agent Test-time Learning with Self-Evolving Memory
Evo-Memory is a new benchmark for self-evolving memory in LLM agents across task streams, with baseline ExpRAG and proposed ReMem method that integrates reasoning, actions, and memory updates for continual improvement.
-
From Standalone LLMs to Integrated Intelligence: A Survey of Compound Al Systems
A survey that defines Compound AI Systems, proposes a multi-dimensional taxonomy based on component roles and orchestration strategies, reviews four foundational paradigms, and identifies key challenges for future research.
-
Catching One in Five: LLM-as-Judge Blind Spots in Production Multi-Turn Transaction Agents
Empirical study of a production multi-turn ordering agent finds LLM-as-judge recall below 25% for human-confirmed defects, missing cross-turn state issues due to limited rubric and routing.
-
AgentAtlas: Beyond Outcome Leaderboards for LLM Agents
AgentAtlas introduces a diagnostic taxonomy and audit protocol to evaluate LLM agent control decisions and trajectories beyond final outcome success.
-
AgentAtlas: Beyond Outcome Leaderboards for LLM Agents
AgentAtlas defines a six-state control taxonomy and nine-category failure taxonomy, then shows that removing explicit label menus from prompts drops trajectory accuracy 14-40 points to a 0.54-0.62 floor across eight models.
-
EngiAI: A Multi-Agent Framework and Benchmark Suite for LLM-Driven Engineering Design
EngiAI is a multi-agent framework unifying topology optimization, retrieval, HPC orchestration, and manufacturing control, with benchmarks showing proprietary LLMs at 96-97% task completion on Beams2D and lower perfor...
-
EcoGym: Evaluating LLMs for Long-Horizon Plan-and-Execute in Interactive Economies
EcoGym is a new open benchmark with three economic environments that reveals no leading LLM dominates at sustained plan-and-execute decision making across scenarios.
-
Memory in the Age of AI Agents
The paper maps agent memory research via three forms (token-level, parametric, latent), three functions (factual, experiential, working), and dynamics of formation/evolution/retrieval, plus benchmarks and future directions.
-
Evo-Memory: Benchmarking LLM Agent Test-time Learning with Self-Evolving Memory
Evo-Memory is a new streaming benchmark and evaluation framework for self-evolving memory in LLM agents, unifying over ten memory modules and introducing the ReMem pipeline for continual improvement on multi-turn and ...
-
OS-ATLAS: A Foundation Action Model for Generalist GUI Agents
OS-Atlas, trained on the largest open-source cross-platform GUI grounding corpus of 13 million elements, outperforms prior open-source models on six benchmarks across mobile, desktop, and web platforms.
-
Do More Agents Help? Controlled and Protocol-Aligned Evaluation of LLM Agent Workflows
Under controlled identical protocols, only one of six multi-agent LLM systems marginally exceeds a single-agent baseline on benchmark-balanced accuracy while the rest trail and cost more; a runtime workflow reaches 66...
-
Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Models
The paper surveys reinforced reasoning techniques for LLMs, covering automated data construction, learning-to-reason methods, and test-time scaling as steps toward Large Reasoning Models.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.