pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.31077 · v1 · pith:W7SZA7SAnew · submitted 2026-05-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Super-Eddington accretion of black holes in early nuclear bursts gives birth to Little Red Dots

Yangyao Chen , Houjun Mo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 22:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Little Red Dotssuper-Eddington accretionnuclear burstsblack hole seedinghigh-redshift galaxiesJWST observationsblack hole growthcosmological model
0
0 comments X

The pith

A subset of black holes with super-Eddington accretion during nuclear bursts accounts for the Little Red Dots seen at high redshift.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies a cosmological model of black hole seeding and growth to show that Little Red Dots arise naturally as the visible members of a larger population of black holes that accrete at super-Eddington rates in nuclear bursts. Observed LRDs are presented as only the bright tip of this population, with the model supplying concrete links to their formation channels at z greater than or equal to 20 and their later evolution into galaxies at lower redshifts. The framework yields testable predictions for black hole and halo mass distributions plus the redshift dependence of LRD number density.

Core claim

The LRD population at high redshift emerges naturally from a subset of BHs with super-Eddington accretion during nuclear bursts. The model suggests that the observed LRDs are the tip of the iceberg of a much larger population of less luminous BHs in the same subset. Most LRDs at z approximately 5 are seeded at z greater than or equal to 20 through direct-collapse BHs or pair-instability supernovae from Pop-III stars and have grown to black hole masses of 10^5 to 10^7 solar masses through nuclear bursts by their observed redshift.

What carries the argument

Selection of black holes by physically motivated criteria within the Chen et al. framework that undergo super-Eddington accretion during nuclear bursts.

If this is right

  • The model supplies specific mass distributions for the black holes and their host galaxies or halos.
  • It predicts a piece-wise redshift evolution of LRD number density.
  • LRDs at z approximately 5 link directly to seeds at z greater than or equal to 20 and evolve into diverse descendants ranging from compact dwarf galaxies to brightest cluster galaxies at z equals 0.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Deeper surveys targeting fainter nuclear sources at similar redshifts could reveal the predicted larger population of less luminous black holes.
  • The same accretion mechanism may apply to other rapidly growing high-redshift black hole populations detected by JWST.
  • Follow-up observations of candidate descendant galaxies at intermediate redshifts could test whether LRDs evolve into the predicted range of local galaxy types.

Load-bearing premise

The set of criteria used to select the predicted black holes from the Chen et al. framework correctly identifies those that match the observed Little Red Dots.

What would settle it

A clear mismatch between the model's predicted black hole mass distribution, host halo masses, or piece-wise redshift evolution of number density and the distributions measured from JWST LRD samples would falsify the proposed connection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.31077 by Houjun Mo, Yangyao Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Selection of LRDs. Each dot represents a BH produced by the model at z = 5 in the planes of a, BHAR (M˙ BH) versus BH mass, and b, BH-mass fraction (fBH ≡ MBH/M⋆) versus BH mass. In each panel, contours from inner to outer encompass 68%, 95% and 99.7%, respec￾tively, of all BHs. Orange line indicates the typical M˙ BH or fBH of the bursty branch. The default selection criterion for LRDs is marked by red sh… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows the predicted number density (n) of LRDs as a function of z based on our default selec￾tion (solid red curve). For comparison, we show the observational results from Y. Ma et al. (2026) and V. Kokorev et al. (2024), and the empirical prediction by K. Inayoshi (2025). The number density of LRDs predicted by our model recovers the piece-wise evolution found in observations: a plateau at z ≳ 4 where the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Distribution of properties of LRDs, their progenitors and descendants. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In a recent paper, Chen et al. developed a framework for modeling the seeding and growth of supermassive black holes (BHs) in the context of $\Lambda$CDM cosmogony. Here, we use a set of physically motivated criteria to select a population of predicted BHs and link them to Little Red Dots (LRDs) discovered by JWST. We show that the LRD population at high redshift ($z$) emerges naturally from a subset of BHs with super-Eddington accretion during nuclear bursts. The model suggests that the observed LRDs are the "tip of the iceberg" of a much larger population of less luminous BHs in the same subset. The model makes specific predictions for the LRD population, such as the mass distributions of their BHs and host galaxies/halos, and the piece-wise redshift evolution of their number density. The cosmological context of the model also allows us to link the observed LRD population to their progenitors (their BH seeds) and lower-$z$ descendant BHs, galaxies and halos. Most LRDs at $z\sim 5$ are seeded at $z \gtrsim 20$ through direct-collapse BHs or pair-instability supernovae from Pop-III stars, and have grown to $M_{\rm BH} \approx 10^5$--$10^7\,{\rm M}_\odot$ through nuclear bursts by their observed redshift. LRDs are predicted to have diverse descendants, ranging from compact dwarf galaxies to brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) at $z=0$. These predictions are consistent with current observations and can be further tested. The success of this model indicates that the results presented here provide a robust foundation for building detailed models of the LRD population.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper applies a set of physically motivated criteria to a subset of black holes from the Chen et al. framework for supermassive BH seeding and growth in ΛCDM cosmology. It claims that JWST Little Red Dots (LRDs) at high redshift emerge naturally as the super-Eddington accretion phase during nuclear bursts in this subset, with observed LRDs as the luminous 'tip of the iceberg' of a larger population. Predictions include BH masses of 10^5–10^7 M⊙, seeding at z ≳ 20 via direct-collapse or Pop-III pair-instability supernovae, piecewise redshift evolution of number density, and diverse z=0 descendants ranging from compact dwarfs to BCGs; the model is stated to be consistent with observations and to provide a robust foundation for detailed LRD modeling.

Significance. If the interpretive mapping holds, the work supplies a cosmological context linking high-z LRDs to early BH seeds and low-z descendants, with concrete predictions for mass distributions, halo properties, and number-density evolution that are in principle falsifiable with future data. No machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations are present; the result is an application of the prior Chen et al. framework rather than an independent derivation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that LRDs 'emerge naturally' from the selected subset and constitute the 'tip of the iceberg' lacks any quantitative validation; no direct comparison is shown to observed LRD number densities, luminosity functions, or color-selection criteria at z ∼ 5–7, nor are the selection-criteria thresholds or error budgets specified.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the results presented here provide a robust foundation' and are 'consistent with current observations' rests entirely on the untested assumption that the physically motivated criteria correctly isolate the LRD population; without a forward-model comparison or cross-check against LRD-specific observables, this identification step remains the weakest link.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that LRDs 'emerge naturally' from the selected subset and constitute the 'tip of the iceberg' lacks any quantitative validation; no direct comparison is shown to observed LRD number densities, luminosity functions, or color-selection criteria at z ∼ 5–7, nor are the selection-criteria thresholds or error budgets specified.

    Authors: The claim follows directly from applying the physically motivated selection criteria to the Chen et al. framework, which isolates BHs undergoing super-Eddington nuclear bursts at the observed redshifts and masses; the 'tip of the iceberg' statement is a direct consequence of the model predicting a much larger underlying population. The selection thresholds are defined in the methods, and the paper reports the resulting mass range, seeding epochs, and piecewise number-density evolution. We agree, however, that the abstract itself contains no explicit numerical comparison to observed LRD number densities or luminosity functions. We will therefore revise the abstract to add a brief statement of the model's predicted number density at z∼5–7 and to qualify the identification as model-dependent. A full forward-model comparison to color-selection functions lies outside the present scope. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the results presented here provide a robust foundation' and are 'consistent with current observations' rests entirely on the untested assumption that the physically motivated criteria correctly isolate the LRD population; without a forward-model comparison or cross-check against LRD-specific observables, this identification step remains the weakest link.

    Authors: The identification rests on the assumption that the chosen criteria correctly map onto the LRD population; this assumption is physically motivated by the nuclear-burst and super-Eddington phases but is not independently validated against the full set of LRD observables in the present work. The stated consistency refers only to the broad match in redshift, BH-mass range, and the model's ability to produce such objects. We will revise the abstract to replace 'provide a robust foundation' with 'provide a cosmological context' and 'consistent with current observations' with 'makes predictions that are broadly consistent with the observed properties of LRDs', thereby removing the stronger phrasing. revision: yes

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the Chen et al. framework and LambdaCDM; no new free parameters, axioms, or entities are introduced in the abstract itself.

free parameters (1)
  • selection criteria thresholds
    Physically motivated but unspecified thresholds used to link model BHs to observed LRDs; likely tuned to match data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption LambdaCDM cosmogony governs black hole seeding and growth
    Explicitly stated as the modeling context.
  • domain assumption The Chen et al. framework accurately models BH seeding and growth
    The entire LRD interpretation is built directly on this prior work by the same authors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5865 in / 1528 out tokens · 37139 ms · 2026-06-28T22:08:34.589555+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984 2025

  2. [2]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 11372, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3902 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A

    Asada, Y., Sawicki, M., Abraham, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 11372, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3902 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3902 2024

  3. [3]

    Baggen, J. F. W., Scoggins, M. T., van Dokkum, P., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1002, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae58a5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae58a5 2026

  4. [4]

    C., & Dexter, J

    Begelman, M. C., & Dexter, J. 2026, ApJ, 996, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a Bogd´ an,´A., Goulding, A. D., Natarajan, P., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 8, 126, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a 2026

  5. [5]

    2024, Nature, 633, 318–322, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9

    Carniani, S., Hainline, K., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2024, Nature, 633, 318, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9 2024

  6. [6]

    J., Adams, N., et al

    Carranza-Escudero, M., Conselice, C. J., Adams, N., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, L50, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf73d

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf73d 2025

  7. [7]

    2003, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/376392 2003

  8. [8]

    C., Li, R., & Zhuang, M.-Y

    Chen, C.-H., Ho, L. C., Li, R., & Zhuang, M.-Y. 2025, ApJ, 983, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada93a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada93a 2025

  9. [9]

    2024, MNRAS, 532, 4340, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1757 10Chen and Mo

    Chen, Y., Mo, H., & Wang, H. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 4340, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1757 10Chen and Mo

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1757 2024

  10. [10]

    A two-phase model of galaxy formation: IV. Seeding and growing supermassive black holes in dark matter halos

    Chen, Y., Mo, H., & Wang, H. 2025a, A Two-Phase Model of Galaxy Formation: IV. Seeding and Growing Supermassive Black Holes in Dark Matter Halos, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.03283

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.03283

  11. [11]

    2025b, MNRAS, 540, 1235, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf791

    Chen, Y., Mo, H., & Wang, H. 2025b, MNRAS, 540, 1235, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf791

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf791

  12. [12]

    2023, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:2301.030

    Chen, Y., & Wang, K. 2023, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:2301.030. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ascl.soft01030C

    2023

  13. [13]

    P., Whitaker, K

    Cloonan, A. P., Whitaker, K. E., Manning, S. M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.24700, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.24700

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.24700 2026

  14. [14]

    Conroy, C., & Gunn, J. E. 2010, ApJ, 712, 833, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/2/833 2010

  15. [15]

    E., & White, M

    Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E., & White, M. 2009, ApJ, 699, 486, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/1/486 2009

  16. [16]

    A., Schaye, J., Bower, R

    Crain, R. A., Schaye, J., Bower, R. G., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 1937, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv725

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv725 2015

  17. [17]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 622, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01918-w

    Curtis-Lake, E., Carniani, S., Cameron, A., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 622, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01918-w de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A168, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554681

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01918-w 2023

  18. [18]

    2022, ApJ, 929, 120, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5aaa

    Dong, F., Zhao, D., Han, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 929, 120, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5aaa

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5aaa 2022

  19. [19]

    2016, ApJ, 820, 131, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/131

    El-Badry, K., Wetzel, A., Geha, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 131, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/131

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/2/131 2016

  20. [20]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f 2024

  21. [21]

    E., Setton, D

    Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., Furtak, L. J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 996, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1836

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1836 2026

  22. [22]

    H., White, S

    Greif, T. H., White, S. D. M., Klessen, R. S., & Springel, V. 2011, ApJ, 736, 147, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/147

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/2/147 2011

  23. [23]

    F., Gurvich, A

    Hopkins, P. F., Gurvich, A. B., Shen, X., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 2241, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1902

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1902 2023

  24. [24]

    F., Grudic, M

    Hopkins, P. F., Grudic, M. Y., Su, K.-Y., et al. 2024, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 7, 18, doi: 10.21105/astro.2309.13115

    work page doi:10.21105/astro.2309.13115 2024

  25. [25]

    2025, ApJL, 988, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adea66

    Inayoshi, K. 2025, ApJL, 988, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adea66

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adea66 2025

  26. [26]

    2026, ApJ, 1000, 90, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae42ce

    Inayoshi, K., Murase, K., & Kashiyama, K. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 90, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae42ce

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae42ce 2026

  27. [27]

    2025a, BlackTHUNDER – A Non-Stellar Balmer Break in a Black Hole-Dominated Little Red Dot at$z=7.04$, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.13082

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., ¨Ubler, H., et al. 2025a, BlackTHUNDER – A Non-Stellar Balmer Break in a Black Hole-Dominated Little Red Dot at$z=7.04$, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.13082

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.13082

  28. [28]

    2025b, MNRAS, 541, 2134, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1083

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., Ferland, G., et al. 2025b, MNRAS, 541, 2134, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1083

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1083

  29. [29]

    2021, MNRAS, 502, 621, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa4034

    Jiang, F., Dekel, A., Freundlich, J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 621, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa4034

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa4034 2021

  30. [30]

    2025, Formation of the Little Red Dots from the Core-collapse of Self-interacting Dark Matter Halos, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.23710

    Jiang, F., Jia, Z., Zheng, H., et al. 2025, Formation of the Little Red Dots from the Core-collapse of Self-interacting Dark Matter Halos, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.23710

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.23710 2025

  31. [31]

    2025, ApJ, 988, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade439

    Jiang, W., Han, J., Dong, F., & He, F. 2025, ApJ, 988, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade439

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade439 2025

  32. [32]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1898

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1898 2025

  33. [33]

    I., Greene, J

    Kokorev, V., Caputi, K. I., Greene, J. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265 2024

  34. [34]

    S., Sijacki, D., et al

    Koudmani, S., Somerville, R. S., Sijacki, D., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 60, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1422

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1422 2024

  35. [35]

    E., Bezanson, R., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551 2025

  36. [36]

    A., Whalen, D

    Latif, M. A., Whalen, D. J., Khochfar, S., Herrington, N. P., & Woods, T. E. 2022, Nature, 607, 48, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04813-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04813-y 2022

  37. [37]

    2025, MNRAS, 543, 1878, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1594

    Li, H., Chen, Y., Wang, H., & Mo, H. 2025, MNRAS, 543, 1878, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1594

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1594 2025

  38. [38]

    Li, Z., Inayoshi, K., Chen, K., Ichikawa, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025, ApJ, 980, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada5fb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada5fb 2025

  39. [39]

    E., & Ma, Y

    Liu, H., Jiang, Y.-F., Quataert, E., Greene, J. E., & Ma, Y. 2025, ApJ, 994, 113, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0c19

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0c19 2025

  40. [40]

    2026, MNRAS, 548, stag562, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag562

    Ma, Q., Chen, Y., & Mo, H. 2026, MNRAS, 548, stag562, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag562

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag562 2026

  41. [41]

    E., Setton, D

    Ma, Y., Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4596

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4596 2026

  42. [42]

    2024, Nature, 627, 59, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07052-5

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Witstok, J., et al. 2024, Nature, 627, 59, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07052-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07052-5 2024

  43. [43]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345 2024

  44. [44]

    2024, MNRAS, 532, 3808, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1727

    Mo, H., Chen, Y., & Wang, H. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 3808, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1727

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1727 2024

  45. [45]

    A "Black Hole Star" Reveals the Remarkable Gas-Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025a, A ”Black Hole Star” Reveals the Remarkable Gas-Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16596

  46. [46]

    P., Oesch, P

    Naidu, R. P., Oesch, P. A., Brammer, G., et al. 2025b, A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at $z {\rm{spec}}=14.44$Confirmed with JWST, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.11263

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.11263

  47. [47]

    2019, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 6, 2, doi: 10.1186/s40668-019-0028-x

    Nelson, D., Springel, V., Pillepich, A., et al. 2019, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 6, 2, doi: 10.1186/s40668-019-0028-x P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Barro, G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad38bb

    work page doi:10.1186/s40668-019-0028-x 2019

  48. [48]

    2025, A&A, 693, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452422

    Perger, K., Fogasy, J., Frey, S., & Gab´ anyi, K.´E. 2025, A&A, 693, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452422

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452422 2025

  49. [49]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 648, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3112 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P

    Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Hernquist, L., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 648, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3112 LRDs as BHs in super-Eddington accretion11 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3112 2018

  50. [50]

    G., Braff, L., Garg, A., Profumo, S., & Jeltema, T

    Roberts, M. G., Braff, L., Garg, A., Profumo, S., & Jeltema, T. 2026, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2026, 003, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/05/003

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/05/003 2026

  51. [51]

    P., Tollerud, E

    Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., Greenfield, P., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  52. [52]

    J., Almaini, O., Edge, A

    Sijacki, D., Springel, V., Di Matteo, T., & Hernquist, L. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 877, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12153.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12153.x 2007

  53. [53]

    2025, MNRAS, 537, 817, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf062 Sk´ ulad´ ottir,´A., Koutsouridou, I., Vanni, I., et al

    Sivasankaran, A., Blecha, L., Torrey, P., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 817, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf062 Sk´ ulad´ ottir,´A., Koutsouridou, I., Vanni, I., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad4b1a

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf062 2025

  54. [54]

    D., Piro, A

    Somerville, R. S., Hopkins, P. F., Cox, T. J., Robertson, B. E., & Hernquist, L. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 481, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13805.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13805.x 2008

  55. [55]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 4672, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3169

    Izquierdo-Villalba, D. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 4672, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3169

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3169 2023

  56. [56]

    Gurvich and Xiangcheng Ma and Lindsey Byrne and Kareem El-Badry and Daniel Anglés-Alcázar and T

    Stern, J., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., Fielding, D., et al. 2021, ApJ, 911, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd776

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd776 2021

  57. [57]

    L., Haiman, Z., et al

    Su, K.-Y., Bryan, G. L., Haiman, Z., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 4258, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad252

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad252 2023

  58. [58]

    J., Hainline, K., et al

    Tacchella, S., Eisenstein, D. J., Hainline, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdbc6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdbc6 2023

  59. [59]

    You can't see me: Super-Eddington growth hindering X-ray detection in high-z broad-line active galactic nuclei

    Trinca, A., Lupi, A., Haardt, F., & Madau, P. 2026, You Can’t See Me: Super-Eddington Growth Hindering X-ray Detection in High-z Broad-Line AGNs, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.22305

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.22305 2026

  60. [60]

    W., Liu, C., et al

    Wang, K., Peng, E. W., Liu, C., et al. 2023, Nature, 623, 296, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06650-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06650-z 2023

  61. [61]

    2026, Halo Assembly Bias in the Early Universe: A Clustering Probe of the Origin of the Little Red Dots, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.15736

    Wang, Z., Jiang, F., Zheng, H., et al. 2026, Halo Assembly Bias in the Early Universe: A Clustering Probe of the Origin of the Little Red Dots, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.15736

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.15736 2026

  62. [62]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Weinberger, R., Springel, V., Hernquist, L., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 3291, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2944

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2944 2017

  63. [63]

    H., Regan, J

    Wise, J. H., Regan, J. A., O’Shea, B. W., et al. 2019, Nature, 566, 85, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0873-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0873-4 2019

  64. [64]

    2023, Nature, 618, 712, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06028-1

    Xing, Q.-F., Zhao, G., Liu, Z.-W., et al. 2023, Nature, 618, 712, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06028-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06028-1 2023

  65. [65]

    2014, ARA&A, 52, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003

    Yuan, F., & Narayan, R. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003 2014

  66. [66]

    T., et al

    Yue, M., Eilers, A.-C., Ananna, T. T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7eba

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7eba 2024

  67. [67]

    2025, Unveiling Extended Components of ’Little Red Dots’ in Rest-Frame Optical, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.25830

    Zhang, Y., Ding, X., Yang, L., et al. 2025, Unveiling Extended Components of ’Little Red Dots’ in Rest-Frame Optical, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.25830

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.25830 2025

  68. [68]

    2025, Nature, 642, 47, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08965-5

    Zhang, Z., Chen, Y., Rong, Y., et al. 2025, Nature, 642, 47, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08965-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08965-5 2025