REVIEW
Can dark energy evolve to the Phantom?
Astrophysics · Submitted 6 Jul 2004 · 43 references
Pith's verdict: The central no-go is correct and is the standard citation for it; the fine-tuning prong is solid, the perturbation-instability prong is asserted more rigorously than it is actually shown.
T0 · AI review
Why Pith says this
Highlight any text to comment on it.
Referee report
The paper
The paper claims
A single scalar field cannot smoothly carry dark energy across the $w = -1$ divide: any trajectory that crosses is either a measure-zero fine tuning or violently unstable to cosmological perturbations.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the identity $w = -1 + 2X p_{,X}/ε$, obtained from $ε = 2Xp_{,X} - p$ and $p = wε$, which converts the question 'can $w$ cross $-1$?' into the geometric question 'can a phase-space trajectory cross the surface $p_{,X} = 0$?'. Around that surface the paper linearises the equations of motion in the $(φ, φ̇)$ plane, obtains the perturbation matrix for the coupled system of field and metric perturbations, and shows that its eigenvalues either force the crossing onto a lower-dimensional set of trajectories or make the growth of perturbations divergent. The same machinery is applied to the k-essence-type Lagrangian $p = ½(K(φ)φ̇^2 - V(φ))$, where the crossing requires the kinetic coefficient $K(φ)$ to change sign and the analysis reduces to a local study near the singular line $K = 0$, and to the case where dark energy does not dominate, where the Friedmann equation is kept with the matter density included and the argument is shown to still go through for Lagrangians quadratic in $X$.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that the phantom divide at $w = -1$ is a singular surface in the phase space of a single scalar field, not a line that ordinary trajectories can cross. Writing the equation of state as $w = -1 + 2X p_{,X}/ε$, with $X = ½∇_μφ∇^μφ ≥ 0$ and positive energy density $ε$, the sign of $w + 1$ is the sign of $p_{,X}$; hence any transition between $w > -1$ and $w < -1$ must pass through a point where $p_{,X} = 0$. Vikman classifies the possible crossing points and finds that in general they are reached only by a discrete set of trajectories in the $(φ, φ̇)$ phase space, so a crossing requires fine-tuned initial conditions, or else the crossing trajectory is unstable with respect to cosmological perturbations: the effective sound speed squared, $c_s^2 = p_{,X}/ε_{,X}$, vanishes at the crossing and the perturbation equations become singular there. The analysis is carried out for arbitrary $p(φ, X)$ and checked against numerical solutions of specific models, including the case $p = ½(K(φ)φ̇^2 - V(φ))$, where $K > 0$ gives $w ≥ -1$ and $K < 0$ gives $w ≤ -1$, so a crossing requires $K$ to change sign and the crossing point sits on the non-differentiable line $K = 0$.
Load-bearing premise
The whole argument rests on dark energy being a single scalar field whose Lagrangian depends only on the field and its first derivatives, with no non-minimal coupling to gravity and no extra degrees of freedom, since that is what makes the phase space two-dimensional and the crossing surface $p_{,X} = 0$ a codimension-one obstacle.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- A supernova-fit preference for $w$ crossing $-1$ within a single scalar field should be read as fine tuning of initial conditions rather than as a generic prediction of the model.
- Where a crossing is engineered, the effective sound speed squared vanishes there, so the homogeneous background description breaks down at the crossing moment and dark energy perturbations behave pathologically.
- The conclusion applies to an arbitrary Lagrangian $p(φ, X)$, so it is not an artefact of a particular quintessence or k-essence model.
- The result is reported to survive when dark energy does not dominate, at least for Lagrangians quadratic in $X$, so the presence of matter does not open a crossing route.
- The spatial topology of the Friedmann model does not change the conclusion, so a closed or open universe does not rescue the crossing.
Reading between the lines
- If a crossing is genuinely forbidden for one minimally coupled scalar field, then a robust observational detection of $w$ crossing $-1$ becomes a discriminator for physics beyond that assumption: multiple fields, non-minimal coupling to gravity, modified gravity, or an interacting dark sector.
- The vanishing of $c_s^2$ at the crossing is not only an obstruction but potentially a signature: near a crossing the dark energy clustering and the perturbation spectrum should show a distinctive feature at the crossing redshift, which is in principle separable from a smooth approach to $-1$.
- Read as a no-go statement, the paper argues for penalising cosmological parametrisations that cross $-1$ relative to those that merely approach it asymptotically, since only the latter are generic in this class of models.
Original abstract
Dark energy rapidly evolving from the dustlike state in the close past to the phantomlike state at present has been recently proposed as the best fit for the supernovae Ia data. Assuming that a dark energy component with an arbitrary scalar-field Lagrangian, which has a general dependence on the field itself and its first derivatives, dominates in the flat Friedmann universe, we analyze the possibility of a dynamical transition from the states with w>-1 to those with w<-1 or vice versa. We have found that generally such transitions are physically implausible because they are either realized by a discrete set of trajectories in the phase space or are unstable with respect to the cosmological perturbations. This conclusion is confirmed by a comparison of the analytic results with numerical solutions obtained for simple models. Without the assumption of the dark energy domination, this result still holds for a certain class of dark energy Lagrangians, in particular, for Lagrangians quadratic in field's first derivatives. The result is insensitive to topology of the Friedmann universe as well.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Dark energy rapidly evolving from the dustlike state in the close past to the phantomlike state at present has been recently proposed as the best fit for the supernovae Ia data. Assuming that a dark energy component with an arbitrary scalar-field Lagrangian, which has a general dependence on the field itself and its first derivatives, dominates in the flat Friedmann universe, we analyze the possibility of a dynamical transition from the states with w>-1 to those with w<-1 or vice versa. We have found that generally such transitions are physically implausible because they are either realized by a discrete set of trajectories in the phase space or are unstable with respect to the cosmological perturbations. This conclusion is confirmed by a comparison of the analytic results with numerical solutions obtained for simple models. Without the assumption of the dark energy domination, this result still holds for a certain class of dark energy Lagrangians, in particular, for Lagrangians quadratic in field's first derivatives. The result is insensitive to topology of the Friedmann universe as well.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Dark energy rapidly evolving from the dustlike state in the close past to the phantomlike state at present has been recently proposed as the best fit for the supernovae Ia data. | background 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.05 | asserted 0.78 |
| s1 | Assuming that a dark energy component with an arbitrary scalar-field Lagrangian, which has a general dependence on the field itself and its first derivatives, dominates in the flat Friedmann universe, we analyze the possibility of a dynamical transition from the states with w>-1 to those with w<-1 or vice versa. | method 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.04 | hedged possibility 0.51 |
| s2 | We have found that generally such transitions are physically implausible because they are either realized by a discrete set of trajectories in the phase space or are unstable with respect to the cosmological perturbations. | result 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.92 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | This conclusion is confirmed by a comparison of the analytic results with numerical solutions obtained for simple models. | method 0.49 | 0.92 | 0.09 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | Without the assumption of the dark energy domination, this result still holds for a certain class of dark energy Lagrangians, in particular, for Lagrangians quadratic in field's first derivatives. | result 0.94 | 0.87 | 0.10 | asserted 0.98 |
| s5 | The result is insensitive to topology of the Friedmann universe as well. | result 0.95 | 0.79 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v4
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
Figures
Figures reproduced from arXiv:astro-ph/0407107 by the authors.
References
How later papers used it
132 later papers cite it
1 later paper by other authors is listed below: 1 cited it as support.
Cites it as support 1 of 13 papers with this label
-
Used this paper to support that gradient instabilities could arise around the bounce time, when ȧ(t_b)=0, because ȧ is negative before and positive after t_b, implying Ḣ>0 in some neighborhood of t_b.
General background conditions for K-bounce and adiabaticity (2016) · 0.97 · paraphrased: the licence does not allow quoting
How the literature uses it
117 arXiv papers cite this in 161 sentences
Papers citing it · 128 sentences without a confident label
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
-
The reconstruction of the scalar-tensor gravity is based on the Refs. [ref] .
Finite-time Cosmological Singularities and the Possible Fate of the Universe · Scalar-tensor Gravity · 0.84
Uses its data or values 1 paper
-
The effect is any case very small, given the constrains in place: WMAP results [ref] show our universe to be nearly flat, implying an average density close to the critical value $ρ≈10^-26kg m^-3$; assuming an equation of state of the form $p=-wρ$, the parameter $w$ is constrained from observations to be within $-1.2≲w<-1/3$ (e.g. [ref] ).
Gravitational Magnus effect · Magnus effect in cosmology: the FLRW metric · 0.93
Compares with it 2 papers
-
Our conclusion on the fate of the strong coupling issue in any pure[Here by pure we mean without the inclusion of high energy irrelevant operators.] $P(X)$ cosmological bounce (including a $P(Φ,X)$ bounce) therefore departs from some other previous analysis, but agrees with [ref] .
Unitary null energy condition violation in $P(X)$ cosmologies · Introduction · 0.80
-
Thus this IS-bounce trajectory is clearly demonstrating the singular behavior similar to those found in [ref] for k-essence models crossing the phantom divide without changing the sign of the square of the sound speed.
Unbraiding the Bounce: Superluminality around the Corner · Phase Space · 0.99
Cites it as support 8 papers
-
However, a purely shift symmetric Horndeski gravity cannot cross $w=-1$ from $w<-1$ at early times to $w>-1$ at late times [ref] , but requires a “push” from a potential term.
Charging Across the Phantom Divide with Modified Gravity · Shift Symmetry and Charge · 0.97
-
In addition to the previous considerations, the $k$-essence scalar field cannot produce a phantom crossing even if $K=K(ϕ,X)$; see reference [ref] .
Dark energy with a shift-symmetric scalar field: obstacles, loophole hunting and dead ends · What is left? · 0.98
-
This is mainly motivated by the fact that recent fits to supernovae, CMB and weak gravitational lensing data probably favor an evolving equation of state, with the dark energy parameter crossing the phantom divide $ω=-1$ [ref] .
Phantom stars and topology change · Time-dependent spacetime · 0.97
Cites it as background 19 papers
-
The possibility that the dark energy EoS parameter $w ≡p/ρ$ may evolve dynamically and possibly cross the phantom divide line $w=-1$ has attracted interest in the literature in the past, see for example, [ref] .
Is Phantom Divide Crossing in General Relativity Completely Impossible? Shortcomings in canonical and minimally coupled scalar field and Possible Solutions in $k$-essence Models · General Considerations of Phantom Crossing in Single Scalar Field GR Framework · 0.98
-
Many others aspects concerning to k-essence theory have been explored in the literature such as an unifying model of dark components with k-essence [ref] , [ref] , k-essence as dark energy source [ref] , purely kinetic multi k-essence model crossing the phantom divide barrier [ref] , [ref] , tracking solution [ref] or holography [ref] and so on.
k-essence and tachyons in brane-worlds · Introduction · 0.96
-
Since 2010 it is well known that minimally-coupled scalar-tensor theories with Kinetic Gravity Braiding [ref] can dynamically violate the Null Energy Condition (NEC)[For a system with energy-momentum tensor $T^μν$, the NEC holds provided $T_μνn^μn^ν≥0$ for all null / light-like vectors $n^μ$.] and cross the phantom divide[This divide is physically impossible to cross [ref] for k-essence and theories with minimal coupling to gravity and without higher derivatives introducing the braiding between the derivatives of the metric and of the scalar field. ] without developing ghost and gradient instabilities[Despite the positivity of the energy density for linear perturbations, it is important to note that any theory violating the NEC necessarily has the energy density unbounded from below [ref] . ], see [ref] .
Unbraiding the Bounce: Superluminality around the Corner · Introduction and discussion · 0.95
Discussion
Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.