Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

Absorption of mass and angular momentum by a black hole: Time-domain formalisms for gravitational perturbations, and the small-hole/slow-motion approximation

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 13 Jul 2004 · 64 references

Pith's verdict: A careful, genuinely useful methods paper — the time-domain flux formulas are the deliverable, and the abstract oversells the quadrupole interpretation that the Note added already walks back.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on October 29, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 6 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDgr-qc/0407050 (version 2)
Pith ID6U2EWICG, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationEric Poisson. "Absorption of mass and angular momentum by a black hole: Time-domain formalisms for gravitational perturbations, and the small-hole/slow-motion approximation." arXiv:gr-qc/0407050 (2004). https://pith.science/paper/6U2EWICG
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Referee report
The paper

The paper claims

The paper derives time-domain prescriptions for how much mass and angular momentum a black hole absorbs from gravitational radiation, and then solves them analytically for small or slowly moving holes, where the absorption is carried by tid

The reading

This paper asks a practical question: given a black hole being shaken by gravitational radiation from outside, how do you compute the resulting slow drift in its mass and spin without decomposing everything into frequencies? Poisson's answer is two recipes that read the answer directly off time-domain perturbation variables evaluated on the horizon — one built on the Teukolsky equation for a rotating hole, one on the Regge-Wheeler and Zerilli equations for a non-rotating hole. The recipes are stated to reduce to the older frequency-domain results of Teukolsky and Press when the perturbation is a single pure mode, so they are a translation rather than a replacement. The second half of the paper uses these recipes where they can be solved by hand: a hole much smaller than the radius of curvature of its environment, or moving slowly through it. There the absorbed energy and angular momentum turn out to be set by a coupling between the external tidal field and the quadrupole moments the tide induces on the hole, and the two cases differ sharply — a non-rotating hole's induced moments track the *rate of change* of the tide, while a rotating hole's track the tide itself. The consequence the author draws is that a spinning hole placed in the same environment absorbs more than a non-spinning one.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the Hawking-Hartle description of a perturbed event horizon: the horizon's intrinsic two-metric $gamma_{AB}$ evolves according to its expansion $Theta$ and shear $sigma_{AB}$, the shear is driven by the horizon Weyl curvature through $(partial_v - kappa)sigma_{AB} = -C_{AB}$, and the expansion is driven by the shear squared. Averaging the expansion over times long compared with $kappa^{-1}$ turns the area growth into a flux, and the averaged first law $(kappa/8pi)langle dot A rangle = langle dot M rangle - Omega_H langle dot J rangle$ converts that single number into mass and angular-momentum rates. The second device is the rewriting of $C_{AB}$ in terms of the Teukolsky scalar $Psi$, which is what makes the whole thing computable from a standard perturbation code. The third is the observation that in the small-hole/slow-motion regime the perturbation equations can be integrated by parts into local expressions, so that the asymptotic tidal field $E_{ab}(v)$, $B_{ab}(v)$ can be propagated to the horizon analytically.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a pair of flux formulae. For a general Kerr hole, one solves the Teukolsky equation for the horizon Weyl scalar $Psi$, forms the two integrated curvatures $Phi^m_+$ and $Phi^m_-$ (one an exponentially weighted integral into the future, one a plain integral into the past), and inserts them into Eqs. (5.27)-(5.29) to get $langle dot M rangle$, $langle dot J rangle$, and $langle dot A rangle$. For a Schwarzschild hole, one solves the Regge-Wheeler and Zerilli equations and inserts $Psi^{lm}_{RW}(v,r_+)$ and $dot Psi^{lm}_{ZM}(v,r_+)$ into Eqs. (7.8)-(7.9); apart from $u to v$ these are the same expressions that give the energy and angular-momentum carried to future null infinity. The author then evaluates these in a small-hole/slow-motion expansion, where $M/R ll 1$ with $R$ the external radius of curvature, and obtains closed forms: for Schwarzschild, $langle dot M rangle = (16M^6/45) langle dot E_{alpha beta} dot E^{alpha beta} + dot B_{alpha beta} dot B^{alpha beta} rangle$ and a corresponding $langle dot J rangle$ scaling as $M^6/R^5$; for Kerr, $langle dot J rangle = O(M^5/R^4)$ with an explicit dependence on the rotation parameter $chi$ and on three invariants of the tidal field, while $langle dot M rangle$ is left at $O(M^5/R^5)$ because the leading-order calculation cannot pin it down. The physical reading offered is that the hole acquires induced mass and current quadrupole moments — proportional to $dot E_{alpha beta}$ and $dot B_{alpha beta}$ for Schwarzschild, to $E_{alpha beta}$ and $B_{alpha beta}$ themselves for Kerr — and that the absorption is the work done by the tide against those moments.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation converts a single number, the averaged growth of horizon area, into separate mass and angular-momentum rates by assuming that each mode carries energy and angular momentum in the ratio $omega/m$ — a relation the paper states holds for matter fields and then explicitly assumes carries over to gravitational perturbations, following Teukolsky and Press.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A time-domain numerical integration of the Teukolsky or Regge-Wheeler/Zerilli equations can be post-processed into absorbed mass and angular momentum by evaluating the perturbation variables at $r = r_+$ and performing two one-dimensional integrals in $v$, with no frequency decomposition at all.
  • For a small or slowly moving hole, the absorbed energy scales as $M^6/R^6$ and the absorbed angular momentum as $M^6/R^5$ in the non-rotating case, so the effect is sharply suppressed for small holes but grows quickly with mass.
  • In a slow-motion binary the results reduce to $langle dot M rangle = (32/5) eta^2 [M/(M+M_{ext})]^4 V^{18}$ and a matching $langle dot J rangle$, which the author notes agree with earlier work by Alvi and by Poisson and Sasaki in their respective limits.
  • For a rotating hole the leading behaviour is $langle dot J rangle = O(M^5/R^4)$, and in rigid rotation $langle dot M rangle = -(8/5) eta^2 [M/(M+M_{ext})]^3 chi(1+3chi^2) V^{15}$, so a spinning hole in an identical environment absorbs more than a non-spinning one.
  • The classic spin-down of a rotating hole in a static tidal field, $dot J = -(2/5) E^2 M^5 chi sin^2alpha [1 - (3/4)(1-5sin^2alpha)chi^2]$, drops out of the general Kerr formula as a special case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the time-domain formulae hold, the same machinery should apply to a horizon-absorbed flux computed inside a full numerical-relativity evolution, giving a horizon-side energy budget that can be checked against the wave-zone flux without ever taking a Fourier transform.
  • The sharp contrast between the $M^6/R^6$ (Schwarzschild) and $M^5/R^5$ (Kerr) scalings suggests the small-hole expansion is not uniformly valid as spin is lowered: the condition $M/R ll chi$ degrades as $chi to 0$, so any numerical scheme spanning both regimes needs to interpolate between two different orderings rather than take a limit.
  • The paper's remark that a non-rotating hole's induced quadrupole tracks the time derivative of the tide, while a rotating hole's tracks the tide itself, looks like a statement about which timescale sets the response — the tide's own variation period versus the hole's rotational period — and should generalise to any tidal response problem with two competing clocks.
  • The undetermined $O(M^5/R^5)$ piece of $langle dot M rangle$ for Kerr is the natural next target; getting it requires the subleading terms in the near-horizon expansion of the radial Teukolsky solution, which is a finite but unglamorous calculation.
Original abstract

The first objective of this work is to obtain practical prescriptions to calculate the absorption of mass and angular momentum by a black hole when external processes produce gravitational radiation. These prescriptions are formulated in the time domain within the framework of black-hole perturbation theory. Two such prescriptions are presented. The first is based on the Teukolsky equation and it applies to general (rotating) black holes. The second is based on the Regge-Wheeler and Zerilli equations and it applies to nonrotating black holes. The second objective of this work is to apply the time-domain absorption formalisms to situations in which the black hole is either small or slowly moving. In the context of this small-hole/slow-motion approximation, the equations of black-hole perturbation theory can be solved analytically, and explicit expressions can be obtained for the absorption of mass and angular momentum. The changes in the black-hole parameters can then be understood in terms of an interaction between the tidal gravitational fields supplied by the external universe and the hole's tidally-induced mass and current quadrupole moments. For a nonrotating black hole the quadrupole moments are proportional to the rate of change of the tidal fields on the hole's world line. For a rotating black hole they are proportional to the tidal fields themselves.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,482 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.45 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The first objective of this work is to obtain practical prescriptions to calculate the absorption of mass and angular momentum by a black hole when external processes produce gravitational radiation. These prescriptions are formulated in the time domain within the framework of black-hole perturbation theory. Two such prescriptions are presented. The first is based on the Teukolsky equation and it applies to general (rotating) black holes. The second is based on the Regge-Wheeler and Zerilli equations and it applies to nonrotating black holes. The second objective of this work is to apply the time-domain absorption formalisms to situations in which the black hole is either small or slowly moving. In the context of this small-hole/slow-motion approximation, the equations of black-hole perturbation theory can be solved analytically, and explicit expressions can be obtained for the absorption of mass and angular momentum. The changes in the black-hole parameters can then be understood in terms of an interaction between the tidal gravitational fields supplied by the external universe and the hole's tidally-induced mass and current quadrupole moments. For a nonrotating black hole the quadrupole moments are proportional to the rate of change of the tidal fields on the hole's world line. For a rotating black hole they are proportional to the tidal fields themselves.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The first objective of this work is to obtain practical prescriptions to calculate the absorption of mass and angular momentum by a black hole when external processes produce gravitational radiation. contribution 0.98 0.64 0.08 asserted 0.92
s1 These prescriptions are formulated in the time domain within the framework of black-hole perturbation theory. method 0.86 0.81 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 Two such prescriptions are presented. contribution 0.97 0.88 0.04 asserted 0.99
s3 The first is based on the Teukolsky equation and it applies to general (rotating) black holes. method 0.64 0.70 0.05 asserted 1.00
s4 The second is based on the Regge-Wheeler and Zerilli equations and it applies to nonrotating black holes. method 0.63 0.67 0.04 asserted 1.00
s5 The second objective of this work is to apply the time-domain absorption formalisms to situations in which the black hole is either small or slowly moving. contribution 0.97 0.77 0.05 asserted 0.96
s6 In the context of this small-hole/slow-motion approximation, the equations of black-hole perturbation theory can be solved analytically, and explicit expressions can be obtained for the absorption of mass and angular momentum. result 0.50 0.82 0.23 asserted 0.88
s7 The changes in the black-hole parameters can then be understood in terms of an interaction between the tidal gravitational fields supplied by the external universe and the hole's tidally-induced mass and current quadrupole moments. interpretation 1.00 0.66 0.26 asserted 0.88
s8 For a nonrotating black hole the quadrupole moments are proportional to the rate of change of the tidal fields on the hole's world line. result 0.79 0.74 0.09 asserted 1.00
s9 For a rotating black hole they are proportional to the tidal fields themselves. result 0.77 0.72 0.10 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.60 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References
How later papers used it

75 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 66 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 20 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 21 of the 193 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Uses its method or tool 1 of 5 papers with this label · 1 by the same authors

By the same authors

Compares with it 1 of 15 papers with this label
How the literature uses it

69 arXiv papers cite this in 186 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 119 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
  • Finally, this prescription implies vanishing tidally-induced multipole moments for a Kerr black hole, which appears to be in contradiction with the tidal torquing calculation of [ref] ; see Sec. [ref] above.

    Tidal Love Numbers of Kerr Black Holes · An alternative tidal/response split · contest 0.71

Builds on it 4 papers
Uses its method or tool 4 papers
Uses its data or values 1 paper
  • The induced quadrupole of a tidally distorted Schwarzschild black hole contains the contribution $3245G^5M^6Ė_ab$ [ref] , which, in the normalization conventions of Eqs. [ref] and [ref], identifies the tidal-heating coefficient as [equation] strictly positive, as Eq. [ref] demands.

    A Bound on the Dynamical Love Number · Low-frequency consistency checks for black hole responses · 0.81

Compares with it 15 papers
  • This expression correctly reproduces known results in the literature for the few low-order dissipation numbers (note our different choice of normalization in ([ref])) [ref] .

    Tidal Deformation and Dissipation of Rotating Black Holes · Tidal effects of the Schwarzschild black hole · 0.98

  • Equations ([ref]), ([ref]), and ([ref]) differ from the original expressions displayed in Ref. [ref] by terms involving the gravito-magnetic tidal moments $_ab(v)$.

    Tidal interaction of black holes and Newtonian viscous bodies · Flux formulae for black holes · 0.93

  • This result matches others in literature [Eqs. (5.14) and (5.22) in Ref. [ref] , as well as [ref] and [ref] ] for a normal mode (i.e. $ℑω= 0$) up to coordinate and tetrad changes.[ Note that our result disagrees with Ref. [ref] slightly for the complex mode case.

    Nonlinear effect of absorption on the ringdown of a spinning black hole · Flux for a frequency-space perturbation · 0.97

Cites it as support 1 paper
  • This observed change is smaller than the numerical errors in the simulations, and analytical estimates [ref] suggest that the increase in irreducible mass due to tidal heating should be even smaller in this case.

    Horizon Surface Gravity in Corotating Black Hole Binaries · Innermost circular orbit · 0.96

Cites it as background 22 papers

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.