Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Low Frequency Names Exhibit Bias and Overfitting in Contextualizing Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.00672 v1 pith:GT6O6KMU submitted 2021-10-01 cs.CY cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

Low Frequency Names Exhibit Bias and Overfitting in Contextualizing Language Models

classification cs.CY cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords namesfrequencybiasinfrequentinitiallessmodelsrepresentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We use a dataset of U.S. first names with labels based on predominant gender and racial group to examine the effect of training corpus frequency on tokenization, contextualization, similarity to initial representation, and bias in BERT, GPT-2, T5, and XLNet. We show that predominantly female and non-white names are less frequent in the training corpora of these four language models. We find that infrequent names are more self-similar across contexts, with Spearman's r between frequency and self-similarity as low as -.763. Infrequent names are also less similar to initial representation, with Spearman's r between frequency and linear centered kernel alignment (CKA) similarity to initial representation as high as .702. Moreover, we find Spearman's r between racial bias and name frequency in BERT of .492, indicating that lower-frequency minority group names are more associated with unpleasantness. Representations of infrequent names undergo more processing, but are more self-similar, indicating that models rely on less context-informed representations of uncommon and minority names which are overfit to a lower number of observed contexts.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Camellia: Benchmarking Cultural Biases in LLMs for Asian Languages

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Across nine Asian languages, multilingual LLMs favor Western cultural entities in 30-40% of culturally grounded contexts, with model-specific sentiment biases and extraction accuracy gaps.