REVIEW 2 cited by
Avast-CTU Public CAPE Dataset
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Avast-CTU Public CAPE Dataset
read the original abstract
There is a limited amount of publicly available data to support research in malware analysis technology. Particularly, there are virtually no publicly available datasets generated from rich sandboxes such as Cuckoo/CAPE. The benefit of using dynamic sandboxes is the realistic simulation of file execution in the target machine and obtaining a log of such execution. The machine can be infected by malware hence there is a good chance of capturing the malicious behavior in the execution logs, thus allowing researchers to study such behavior in detail. Although the subsequent analysis of log information is extensively covered in industrial cybersecurity backends, to our knowledge there has been only limited effort invested in academia to advance such log analysis capabilities using cutting edge techniques. We make this sample dataset available to support designing new machine learning methods for malware detection, especially for automatic detection of generic malicious behavior. The dataset has been collected in cooperation between Avast Software and Czech Technical University - AI Center (AIC).
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SMETA-ZSL:Semantic Meta-Alignment for Zero-Shot Threat Classification
SMETA-ZSL combines contrastive LLM prototypes, episodic meta-alignment, and Z-score gating to beat prior generalized zero-shot methods by ~10.8 harmonic-mean points under strict open-set inductive conditions on seven ...
-
Trident: Improving Malware Detection with LLMs and Behavioral Features
Trident combines static decision trees, LLM-generated behavioral rules from sandbox reports, and direct LLM analysis via majority voting to outperform static methods while resisting concept drift without retraining.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.