pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2509.21220 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-25 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-th

Primordial black holes formation in inflationary F(R) models with scalar fields

E.O. Pozdeeva , S.Yu. Vernov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 13:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords F(R) gravityprimordial black holesinflationscalar fieldsdark matterconformal transformationcosmic microwave background
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Adding an induced gravity term and a polynomial potential to F(R) gravity yields a two-field model that fits observed inflation and allows primordial black holes to serve as dark matter.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors extend known F(R) gravity by incorporating an induced gravity term and a fourth-order polynomial potential for an additional scalar field. A conformal transformation then converts the system into a two-field chiral cosmological model. Specific parameter choices make the slow-roll inflation parameters consistent with cosmic microwave background data from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope. Estimates of the masses of primordial black holes formed in this setup fall in a range where they could constitute the dark matter. The construction demonstrates how gravitational modifications can link early-universe inflation to later dark matter phenomenology through black hole production.

Core claim

We construct F(R) gravity models with scalar fields to describe cosmological inflation and formation of primordial black holes (PBHs). By adding the induced gravity term and the fourth-order polynomial potential for the scalar field to the known F(R) gravity model, and using a conformal transformation of the metric, we obtain a two-field chiral cosmological model. For some values of the model parameters, we get that the inflationary parameters of this model are in good agreement with the observations of the cosmic microwave background radiation obtained by the Atacama Cosmology Telescope. The estimation of PBH masses suggests that PBHs could be dark matter candidates.

What carries the argument

The two-field chiral cosmological model obtained via conformal transformation from the F(R) gravity with added induced gravity term and fourth-order polynomial potential.

If this is right

  • The inflationary parameters match Atacama Cosmology Telescope observations for appropriate model parameters.
  • Primordial black holes formed in the model have masses that position them as possible dark matter candidates.
  • The two-field dynamics remain stable for the selected parameter values without requiring additional exclusions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar modifications might be applied to other F(R) models to explore additional cosmological signatures.
  • This framework could be tested by checking consistency with large-scale structure formation data.
  • Variations in the polynomial coefficients might yield different PBH mass spectra for comparison with microlensing observations.

Load-bearing premise

The specific numerical values for the induced-gravity coefficient and the polynomial potential coefficients lead to stable two-field dynamics where slow-roll parameters and PBH abundance can be computed without instabilities or post-hoc adjustments.

What would settle it

A detailed computation revealing that the slow-roll parameters deviate significantly from Atacama Cosmology Telescope data or that the predicted PBH abundance is insufficient to explain dark matter would disprove the viability for these parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.21220 by E.O. Pozdeeva, S.Yu. Vernov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The Hubble function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The evolution of the slow-roll parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The values of the inflationary parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We construct $F(R)$ gravity models with scalar fields to describe cosmological inflation and formation of primordial black holes (PBHs). By adding the induced gravity term and the fourth-order polynomial potential for the scalar field to the known $F(R)$ gravity model, and using a conformal transformation of the metric, we obtain a two-field chiral cosmological model. For some values of the model parameters, we get that the inflationary parameters of this model are in good agreement with the observations of the cosmic microwave background radiation obtained by the Atacama Cosmology Telescope. The estimation of PBH masses suggests that PBHs could be dark matter candidates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs F(R) gravity models augmented by scalar fields, adding an induced-gravity term and a fourth-order polynomial potential to a known F(R) model. A conformal transformation yields a two-field chiral cosmological model. For selected numerical values of the free parameters, the inflationary observables are stated to agree with Atacama Cosmology Telescope data, and PBH mass estimates are given that suggest PBHs as dark-matter candidates.

Significance. A verified, stable two-field realization that simultaneously satisfies ACT constraints and produces a calculable PBH abundance would be a useful addition to the literature on PBH formation in modified gravity. The present manuscript supplies no such verification, so the significance remains prospective rather than demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [two-field chiral model derivation] The central claim rests on the assertion that the chosen numerical values of the induced-gravity coefficient and the polynomial coefficients produce a stable two-field dynamics. No explicit check is supplied that the kinetic metric remains positive-definite or that the effective mass matrix is free of tachyonic modes along the inflationary trajectory (see the section deriving the two-field chiral model after conformal transformation). Without this check the reported slow-roll parameters and PBH spectrum cannot be regarded as reliable.
  2. [inflationary parameters and PBH mass estimation] The statement that inflationary parameters agree with ACT data for 'some values' of the model parameters is presented without the specific numerical values, the resulting slow-roll indices, or a direct comparison table or figure. Because the same parameters are subsequently used to estimate PBH masses, the procedure risks circularity: the parameters are adjusted to fit the CMB data and the PBH abundance is then read off from the same fit.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract should specify the numerical ranges or example values of the induced-gravity coefficient and the polynomial coefficients that produce the reported agreement.
  2. [model construction] Notation for the two-field kinetic metric and the effective potential after conformal transformation should be introduced with explicit definitions before the numerical results are discussed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below and indicate the changes we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim rests on the assertion that the chosen numerical values of the induced-gravity coefficient and the polynomial coefficients produce a stable two-field dynamics. No explicit check is supplied that the kinetic metric remains positive-definite or that the effective mass matrix is free of tachyonic modes along the inflationary trajectory (see the section deriving the two-field chiral model after conformal transformation). Without this check the reported slow-roll parameters and PBH spectrum cannot be regarded as reliable.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit stability analysis is necessary to support the reliability of the slow-roll parameters and PBH estimates. The original manuscript derives the two-field chiral model via conformal transformation but does not include a dedicated check of the kinetic metric signature or the mass-matrix eigenvalues. In the revised version we will add this analysis for the specific parameter choices used, demonstrating that the kinetic metric remains positive definite and that no tachyonic modes appear along the inflationary trajectory. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The statement that inflationary parameters agree with ACT data for 'some values' of the model parameters is presented without the specific numerical values, the resulting slow-roll indices, or a direct comparison table or figure. Because the same parameters are subsequently used to estimate PBH masses, the procedure risks circularity: the parameters are adjusted to fit the CMB data and the PBH abundance is then read off from the same fit.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript states agreement for selected parameter values without tabulating the explicit numbers or slow-roll indices. We will add a table listing the chosen values of the induced-gravity coefficient and polynomial coefficients, the resulting slow-roll parameters, and a direct comparison with ACT constraints. On the question of circularity, the parameters are fixed once by the requirement that the model reproduces the observed CMB spectrum; the PBH mass range is then obtained as a derived consequence of the same potential and perturbation spectrum. This is the standard procedure in the PBH literature, but we will clarify the logical separation of the two steps in the revised text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard model-building with external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper starts from a known F(R) model, adds an induced-gravity term and fourth-order polynomial potential, performs a conformal transformation to a two-field chiral model, selects specific numerical parameter values, and reports that the resulting slow-roll parameters agree with ACT data while PBH masses fall in a range allowing dark-matter candidacy. This sequence is ordinary parameter tuning to match external observations followed by derived implications; the agreement is explicitly conditioned on chosen values rather than presented as an independent first-principles prediction. No quoted equation or step reduces the output to the input by construction, no self-citation is shown to be load-bearing for a uniqueness claim, and the comparison to ACT data supplies an external benchmark. The derivation therefore remains self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a known F(R) base model plus two added terms whose coefficients are adjusted to data; no new entities are postulated and no machine-checked derivations are supplied.

free parameters (1)
  • induced gravity coefficient and polynomial coefficients
    Chosen so that the resulting slow-roll parameters match ACT observations
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The base F(R) model is already viable and the conformal transformation preserves the required cosmological dynamics
    Invoked when the authors state they start from a known F(R) model and obtain a two-field chiral model

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5638 in / 1308 out tokens · 43288 ms · 2026-05-18T13:53:48.000678+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Echoes of $R^3$ modification and Goldstone preheating in the CMB-BAO landscape

    hep-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    An R^3 modification to R^2-Higgs inflation fits the high n_s by inducing Goldstone preheating that reconciles CMB and inflationary energy scales.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 35 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    INTRODUCTION A black hole is called primordial if it formed before the matter dominance epoch. The hypothesis of the exis- tence of primordial black holes (PBHs) is supported by an increasing amount of direct and indirect observations of black holes with masses beyond the astrophysical range, the occurrence of which is not explained by models of stellar c...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1980

  2. [2]

    EVOLUTION EQUATIONS AND INFLATION 3.1. Exact evolution equations In the spatially flat Friedmann–Lemaˆ ıtre–Robertson–Walker metric with the interval ds2 =−dt 2 +a 2(t) dx2 1 +dx 2 2 +dx 2 3 , 3 the model (6) has the following evolution equations [32, 43]: H 2 = 1 6M 2 Pl X 2 + 2VE ,(8) ˙H=− X 2 2M 2 Pl ,(9) where dots denote the time derivatives,X≡ q ˙ϕ2...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Using the conformal transformation of the metric, we get the corresponding chiral cosmological model with two scalar fields

    CONCLUSIONS In this paper, we propose theF(R, χ) gravity models, which unify inflation and PBH formation. Using the conformal transformation of the metric, we get the corresponding chiral cosmological model with two scalar fields. We have found such values of the model parameters, at which the model constructed is in a good agreement with the ACT observat...

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Massive and supermassive black holes in the contemporary and early universe and the new problems of cosmology and astrophysics

    A. D. Dolgov, “Massive and supermassive black holes in the contemporary and early Universe and problems in cosmology and astrophysics,”Usp. Fiz. Nauk188no. 2, (2018) 121–142,arXiv:1705.06859 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Why the mean mass of primordial black hole distribution is close to 10M ⊙,

    A. Dolgov and K. Postnov, “Why the mean mass of primordial black hole distribution is close to 10M ⊙,”JCAP07 (2020) 063,arXiv:2004.11669 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    GW231123: A Possible Primordial Black Hole Origin

    V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, and A. Riotto, “GW231123: a Possible Primordial Black Hole Origin,” arXiv:2508.09965 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Primordial Black Holes

    M. Y. Khlopov, “Primordial Black Holes,”Res. Astron. Astrophys.10(2010) 495–528,arXiv:0801.0116 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    Non-Canonical Inflation and Primordial Black Holes Production

    A. Y. Kamenshchik, A. Tronconi, T. Vardanyan, and G. Venturi, “Non-Canonical Inflation and Primordial Black Holes Production,”Phys. Lett. B791(2019) 201–205,arXiv:1812.02547 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate

    A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh, “Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate,”J. Phys. G48no. 4, (2021) 043001,arXiv:2007.10722 [astro-ph.CO]. 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments

    B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, “Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70(2020) 355–394,arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Constraints on Primordial Black Holes

    B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, “Constraints on primordial black holes,”Rept. Prog. Phys.84 no. 11, (2021) 116902,arXiv:2002.12778 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Baryon isocurvature fluctuations at small scales and baryonic dark matter,

    A. Dolgov and J. Silk, “Baryon isocurvature fluctuations at small scales and baryonic dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D 47(1993) 4244–4255

    work page 1993

  13. [13]

    Inflation and primordial black holes as dark matter,

    P. Ivanov, P. Naselsky, and I. Novikov, “Inflation and primordial black holes as dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 7173–7178

    work page 1994

  14. [14]

    Density Perturbations and Black Hole Formation in Hybrid Inflation

    J. Garcia-Bellido, A. D. Linde, and D. Wands, “Density perturbations and black hole formation in hybrid inflation,”Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 6040–6058,arXiv:astro-ph/9605094

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  15. [15]

    Multi-Field versus Single-Field in the Supergravity Models of Inflation and Primordial Black Holes,

    S. V. Ketov, “Multi-Field versus Single-Field in the Supergravity Models of Inflation and Primordial Black Holes,” Universe7no. 5, (2021) 115

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    ¨Ozsoy and G

    O. ¨Ozsoy and G. Tasinato, “Inflation and Primordial Black Holes,”Universe9no. 5, (2023) 203, arXiv:2301.03600 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    On primordial black holes from an inflection point

    C. Germani and T. Prokopec, “On primordial black holes from an inflection point,”Phys. Dark Univ.18(2017) 6–10,arXiv:1706.04226 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    Primordial Black Hole production in Critical Higgs Inflation

    J. M. Ezquiaga, J. Garcia-Bellido, and E. Ruiz Morales, “Primordial Black Hole production in Critical Higgs Inflation,”Phys. Lett. B776(2018) 345–349,arXiv:1705.04861 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Reconstruction methods and the amplification of the inflationary spectrum,

    L. Chataignier, A. Y. Kamenshchik, A. Tronconi, and G. Venturi, “Reconstruction methods and the amplification of the inflationary spectrum,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 8, (2023) 083506,arXiv:2301.04477 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Superpotential method and the amplification of inflationary perturbations,

    A. Y. Kamenshchik, E. O. Pozdeeva, A. Tribolet, A. Tronconi, G. Venturi, and S. Y. Vernov, “Superpotential method and the amplification of inflationary perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 10, (2024) 104011, arXiv:2406.19762 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Constraining Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation,

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, “Constraining Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation,”Phys. Rev. Lett.132no. 22, (2024) 221003,arXiv:2211.03395 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models,”Phys. Rept.505(2011) 59–144,arXiv:1011.0544 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  23. [23]

    Extended Theories of Gravity

    S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, “Extended Theories of Gravity,”Phys. Rept.509(2011) 167–321, arXiv:1108.6266 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [24]

    Recent Advances in Inflation,

    S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, I. Giannakoudi, F. P. Fronimos, and E. C. Lymperiadou, “Recent Advances in Inflation,”Symmetry15no. 9, (2023) 1701,arXiv:2307.16308 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Investigating f(R)-Inflation: background evolution and constraints,

    E. Fazzari, C. De Leo, G. Montani, M. Martinelli, A. Melchiorri, and G. Ca˜ nas-Herrera, “Investigating f(R)-Inflation: background evolution and constraints,”arXiv:2507.13890 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Towards the Einstein-Hilbert Action via Conformal Transformation,

    K.-i. Maeda, “Towards the Einstein-Hilbert Action via Conformal Transformation,”Phys. Rev. D39(1989) 3159

    work page 1989

  27. [27]

    Improved Model of Primordial Black Hole Formation after Starobinsky Inflation,

    S. Saburov and S. V. Ketov, “Improved Model of Primordial Black Hole Formation after Starobinsky Inflation,” Universe9no. 7, (2023) 323,arXiv:2306.06597 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Quantum Loop Corrections in the Modified Gravity Model of Starobinsky Inflation with Primordial Black Hole Production,

    S. Saburov and S. V. Ketov, “Quantum Loop Corrections in the Modified Gravity Model of Starobinsky Inflation with Primordial Black Hole Production,”Universe10no. 9, (2024) 354,arXiv:2402.02934 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    On the chiral model of cosmological inflation,

    S. V. Chervon, “On the chiral model of cosmological inflation,”Russ. Phys. J.38(1995) 539–543

    work page 1995

  30. [30]

    Cosmological perturbations from multi-field inflation in generalized Einstein theories

    A. A. Starobinsky, S. Tsujikawa, and J. Yokoyama, “Cosmological perturbations from multifield inflation in generalized Einstein theories,”Nucl. Phys. B610(2001) 383–410,arXiv:astro-ph/0107555

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  31. [31]

    The simplest extension of Starobinsky inflation

    C. van de Bruck and L. E. Paduraru, “Simplest extension of Starobinsky inflation,”Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 083513,arXiv:1505.01727 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Starobinsky-like two-field inflation

    S. Kaneda and S. V. Ketov, “Starobinsky-like two-field inflation,”Eur. Phys. J. C76no. 1, (2016) 26, arXiv:1510.03524 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    On the geometrical interpretation of scale-invariant models of inflation

    G. K. Karananas and J. Rubio, “On the geometrical interpretation of scale-invariant models of inflation,”Phys. Lett. B761(2016) 223–228,arXiv:1606.08848 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Scalaron from $R^2$-gravity as a Heavy Field

    S. Pi, Y.-l. Zhang, Q.-G. Huang, and M. Sasaki, “Scalaron fromR 2-gravity as a heavy field,”JCAP05(2018) 042, arXiv:1712.09896 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Superpotential method for chiral cosmological models connected with modified gravity,

    S. V. Chervon, I. V. Fomin, E. O. Pozdeeva, M. Sami, and S. Y. Vernov, “Superpotential method for chiral cosmological models connected with modified gravity,”Phys. Rev. D100no. 6, (2019) 063522,arXiv:1904.11264 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Exact and Slow-Roll Solutions for Exponential Power-Law Inflation Connected with Modified Gravity and Observational Constraints,

    I. Fomin and S. Chervon, “Exact and Slow-Roll Solutions for Exponential Power-Law Inflation Connected with Modified Gravity and Observational Constraints,”Universe6no. 11, (2020) 199,arXiv:2006.16074 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Integrable cosmological models with an additional scalar field,

    V. R. Ivanov and S. Y. Vernov, “Integrable cosmological models with an additional scalar field,”Eur. Phys. J. C 81no. 11, (2021) 985,arXiv:2108.10276 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Primordial black holes from multifield inflation with nonminimal couplings,

    S. R. Geller, W. Qin, E. McDonough, and D. I. Kaiser, “Primordial black holes from multifield inflation with nonminimal couplings,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 6, (2022) 063535,arXiv:2205.04471 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Construction of Chiral Cosmological Models Unifying Inflation and Primordial Black Hole Formation,

    E. O. Pozdeeva and S. Y. Vernov, “Construction of Chiral Cosmological Models Unifying Inflation and Primordial Black Hole Formation,”arXiv:2401.12040 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    Generating PBHs and small-scale GWs in two-field models of inflation,

    M. Braglia, D. K. Hazra, F. Finelli, G. F. Smoot, L. Sriramkumar, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Generating PBHs and small-scale GWs in two-field models of inflation,”JCAP08(2020) 001,arXiv:2005.02895 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    Scalaron–Higgs inflation reloaded: Higgs-dependent scalaron mass and primordial black hole dark matter,

    A. Gundhi and C. F. Steinwachs, “Scalaron–Higgs inflation reloaded: Higgs-dependent scalaron mass and primordial black hole dark matter,”Eur. Phys. J. C81no. 5, (2021) 460,arXiv:2011.09485 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Primordial black hole dark matter in dilaton-extended two-field Starobinsky inflation,

    A. Gundhi, S. V. Ketov, and C. F. Steinwachs, “Primordial black hole dark matter in dilaton-extended two-field Starobinsky inflation,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 8, (2021) 083518,arXiv:2011.05999 [hep-th]. 10

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Hybridα-attractors, primordial black holes and gravitational wave backgrounds,

    M. Braglia, A. Linde, R. Kallosh, and F. Finelli, “Hybridα-attractors, primordial black holes and gravitational wave backgrounds,”JCAP04(2023) 033,arXiv:2211.14262 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    The inflaton that could: primordial black holes and second order gravitational waves from tachyonic instability induced in Higgs-R 2 inflation,

    D. Y. Cheong, K. Kohri, and S. C. Park, “The inflaton that could: primordial black holes and second order gravitational waves from tachyonic instability induced in Higgs-R 2 inflation,”JCAP10(2022) 015, arXiv:2205.14813 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Primordial black holes and gravitational waves from nonminimally coupled supergravity inflation,

    S. Kawai and J. Kim, “Primordial black holes and gravitational waves from nonminimally coupled supergravity inflation,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 4, (2023) 043523,arXiv:2209.15343 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Primordial Black Holes in Induced Gravity Inflationary Models with Two Scalar Fields,

    E. O. Pozdeeva and S. Y. Vernov, “Primordial Black Holes in Induced Gravity Inflationary Models with Two Scalar Fields,”Phys. Part. Nucl.56no. 2, (2025) 542–547,arXiv:2407.00999 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Enhanced curvature perturbation and primordial black hole formation in two-stage inflation with a break,

    X. Wang, Y.-l. Zhang, and M. Sasaki, “Enhanced curvature perturbation and primordial black hole formation in two-stage inflation with a break,”JCAP07(2024) 076,arXiv:2404.02492 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Enhancement of primordial curvature perturbations in R 3-corrected Starobinsky-Higgs inflation,

    J. Kim, X. Wang, Y.-l. Zhang, and Z. Ren, “Enhancement of primordial curvature perturbations in R 3-corrected Starobinsky-Higgs inflation,”JCAP09(2025) 011,arXiv:2504.12035 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Primordial Black Holes SaveR 2 Inflation,

    X. Wang, K. Kohri, and T. T. Yanagida, “Primordial Black Holes SaveR 2 Inflation,”arXiv:2506.06797 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    Higgs Scalaron Mixed Inflation

    Y. Ema, “Higgs Scalaron Mixed Inflation,”Phys. Lett. B770(2017) 403–411,arXiv:1701.07665 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Primordial perturbations generated by Higgs field and $R^2$ operator

    Y.-C. Wang and T. Wang, “Primordial perturbations generated by Higgs field andR 2 operator,”Phys. Rev. D96 no. 12, (2017) 123506,arXiv:1701.06636 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Inflation in the Mixed Higgs-$R^2$ Model

    M. He, A. A. Starobinsky, and J. Yokoyama, “Inflation in the mixed Higgs-R 2 model,”JCAP05(2018) 064, arXiv:1804.00409 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    Scalaron the healer: removing the strong-coupling in the Higgs- and Higgs-dilaton inflations

    D. Gorbunov and A. Tokareva, “Scalaron the healer: removing the strong-coupling in the Higgs- and Higgs-dilaton inflations,”Phys. Lett. B788(2019) 37–41,arXiv:1807.02392 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Higgs-R 2 inflation - full slow-roll study at tree-level,

    V.-M. Enckell, K. Enqvist, S. Rasanen, and L.-P. Wahlman, “Higgs-R 2 inflation - full slow-roll study at tree-level,” JCAP01(2020) 041,arXiv:1812.08754 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Some like it hot: $R^2$ heals Higgs inflation, but does not cool it

    F. Bezrukov, D. Gorbunov, C. Shepherd, and A. Tokareva, “Some like it hot:R 2 heals Higgs inflation, but does not cool it,”Phys. Lett. B795(2019) 657–665,arXiv:1904.04737 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Dynamical Emergence of Scalaron in Higgs Inflation,

    Y. Ema, “Dynamical Emergence of Scalaron in Higgs Inflation,”JCAP09(2019) 027,arXiv:1907.00993 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    Occurrence of tachyonic preheating in the mixed Higgs-R2 model,

    M. He, R. Jinno, K. Kamada, A. A. Starobinsky, and J. Yokoyama, “Occurrence of tachyonic preheating in the mixed Higgs-R2 model,”JCAP01(2021) 066,arXiv:2007.10369 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    Renormalization group equations of Higgs-R 2 inflation,

    Y. Ema, K. Mukaida, and J. van de Vis, “Renormalization group equations of Higgs-R 2 inflation,”JHEP02(2021) 109,arXiv:2008.01096 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    Implication of preheating on gravity assisted baryogenesis in R2-Higgs inflation,

    Y. Cado, C. Englert, T. Modak, and M. Quir´ os, “Implication of preheating on gravity assisted baryogenesis in R2-Higgs inflation,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 2, (2025) 023042,arXiv:2411.11128 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Gravitational wave signatures of preheating in Higgs-R2 inflation,

    J. Kim, Z. Yang, and Y.-l. Zhang, “Gravitational wave signatures of preheating in Higgs-R2 inflation,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 4, (2025) 043534,arXiv:2503.16907 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,”Phys. Lett. B91(1980) 99–102

    work page 1980

  62. [62]

    Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, “Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,”JETP Lett.33(1981) 532–535

    work page 1981

  63. [63]

    Classical and Quantum Cosmology of the Starobinsky Inflationary Model,

    A. Vilenkin, “Classical and Quantum Cosmology of the Starobinsky Inflationary Model,”Phys. Rev. D32(1985) 2511

    work page 1985

  64. [64]

    The R**2 Cosmology: Inflation Without a Phase Transition,

    M. B. Mijic, M. S. Morris, and W.-M. Suen, “The R**2 Cosmology: Inflation Without a Phase Transition,”Phys. Rev. D34(1986) 2934

    work page 1986

  65. [65]

    Inflation as a Transient Attractor in R**2 Cosmology,

    K.-i. Maeda, “Inflation as a Transient Attractor in R**2 Cosmology,”Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 858

    work page 1988

  66. [66]

    On Legacy of Starobinsky Inflation

    S. V. Ketov, “On Legacy of Starobinsky Inflation,” 1, 2025.arXiv:2501.06451 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Alexei Starobinsky and Modern Cosmology,

    A. Linde, “Alexei Starobinsky and Modern Cosmology,”arXiv:2509.01675 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  68. [68]

    Effects of R**3 and R box R terms on R**2 inflation,

    A. L. Berkin and K.-i. Maeda, “Effects of R**3 and R box R terms on R**2 inflation,”Phys. Lett. B245(1990) 348–354

    work page 1990

  69. [69]

    Bouncing inflation in nonlinear $R^2+R^4$ gravitational model

    T. Saidov and A. Zhuk, “Bouncing inflation in nonlinearR 2 +R 4 gravitational model,”Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 124002,arXiv:1002.4138 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  70. [70]

    Fourth-order gravity as the inflationary model revisited

    S. Kaneda, S. V. Ketov, and N. Watanabe, “Fourth-order gravity as the inflationary model revisited,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A25(2010) 2753–2762,arXiv:1001.5118 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  71. [71]

    Slow-roll inflation in (R+R*4) gravity

    S. Kaneda, S. V. Ketov, and N. Watanabe, “Slow-roll inflation in (R+R*4) gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 145016,arXiv:1002.3659 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  72. [72]

    Embedding (R+R^2)-Inflation into Supergravity

    S. V. Ketov and A. A. Starobinsky, “Embedding (R+R 2)-Inflation into Supergravity,”Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 063512,arXiv:1011.0240 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  73. [73]

    A polynomial f(R) inflation model

    Q.-G. Huang, “A polynomial f(R) inflation model,”JCAP02(2014) 035,arXiv:1309.3514 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  74. [74]

    Consistency relation for $R^p$ inflation

    H. Motohashi, “Consistency relation forR p inflation,”Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 064016,arXiv:1411.2972 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  75. [75]

    Inflationary $\alpha$-attractors from $F(R)$ Gravity

    S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, “Inflationaryα-attractors fromF(R) gravity,”Phys. Rev. D94no. 12, (2016) 124026,arXiv:1612.01126 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  76. [76]

    Reconstructing a $f(R)$ theory from the $\alpha$-Attractors

    T. Miranda, J. C. Fabris, and O. F. Piattella, “Reconstructing af(R) theory from theα-Attractors,”JCAP09 (2017) 041,arXiv:1707.06457 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  77. [77]

    Inflation from f(R) theories in gravity’s rainbow,

    A. Waeming and P. Channuie, “Inflation from f(R) theories in gravity’s rainbow,”Eur. Phys. J. C80no. 9, (2020) 802,arXiv:2005.08310 [gr-qc]. 11

    work page arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    Higher-order extension of Starobinsky inflation: Initial conditions, slow-roll regime, and reheating phase,

    G. Rodrigues-da Silva, J. Bezerra-Sobrinho, and L. G. Medeiros, “Higher-order extension of Starobinsky inflation: Initial conditions, slow-roll regime, and reheating phase,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 6, (2022) 063504, arXiv:2110.15502 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    Analytic extensions of Starobinsky model of inflation,

    V. R. Ivanov, S. V. Ketov, E. O. Pozdeeva, and S. Y. Vernov, “Analytic extensions of Starobinsky model of inflation,”JCAP03no. 03, (2022) 058,arXiv:2111.09058 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    New one-parametric extension of the Starobinsky inflationary model,

    E. O. Pozdeeva and S. Y. Vernov, “New one-parametric extension of the Starobinsky inflationary model,”Phys. Scripta98no. 5, (2023) 055001,arXiv:2211.10988 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.