pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.09977 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-10 · ✦ hep-th · hep-lat· hep-ph· nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Does hot QCD have a conformal manifold in the chiral limit?

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 13:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-lathep-phnucl-th
keywords chiral phase transitionQCDconformal manifoldanomaly matchingbaryon chemical potentialimaginary chemical potentialcritical phenomenauniversality class
0
0 comments X

The pith

An 't Hooft anomaly at imaginary baryon chemical potential restricts possible CFT descriptions of the chiral phase transition in hot QCD even at zero chemical potential, allowing for a conformal manifold of universality classes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Lattice evidence points to a second-order chiral phase transition in QCD with two or more massless flavors. The paper applies anomaly matching along the line of imaginary baryon chemical potential to limit the allowed critical theories at zero chemical potential. This narrows the options to three minimal scenarios, with the favored one for three or more flavors involving a conformal manifold controlled by an exactly marginal operator tied to baryon density. If correct, the universality class of the transition would vary continuously with chemical potential rather than being fixed by conventional Landau theory.

Core claim

Anomaly matching at general imaginary baryon chemical potential θ_B constrains any CFT description of the critical line, leaving only three minimal possibilities at θ_B = 0. For N_f ≥ 3 (and possibly N_f = 2), the transition is described by a conformal manifold of θ_B-dependent universality classes that includes an exactly marginal operator associated with baryon density.

What carries the argument

The 't Hooft anomaly of the baryon symmetry at nonzero imaginary chemical potential θ_B, which must be reproduced by the critical CFT and thereby restricts the theory even at θ_B = 0.

Load-bearing premise

The chiral phase transition remains second-order for the relevant number of flavors and is described by a CFT whose anomaly matching at general θ_B directly constrains the possible theories at θ_B = 0.

What would settle it

Lattice results demonstrating a first-order transition for N_f = 3 at zero chemical potential, or showing that critical exponents remain independent of small imaginary chemical potentials instead of varying as expected from an exactly marginal operator.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.09977 by Aleksey Cherman, Robert D. Pisarski, Shi Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Minimal phase diagrams of massless QCD consistent with a natural second-order line of chiral phase transitions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Evaluations of the PB-resummed function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Evaluations of PB-resummed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent lattice evidence suggests the chiral phase transition in QCD is second-order for $N_f \ge 2$ massless flavors. We constrain CFT descriptions of a critical line in temperature $T$ and imaginary baryon chemical potential $\theta_B = i\mu_B/T$. An 't Hooft anomaly at general $\theta_B$ constrains the transition even at $\theta_B = 0$, leaving only three minimal scenarios. The best-motivated scenario for $N_f\ge3$, and perhaps also $N_f = 2$, is beyond Ginzburg-Landau, featuring a conformal manifold of $\theta_B$-dependent universality classes with an exactly marginal operator related to baryon density.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper uses 't Hooft anomaly matching for a putative 3d CFT describing the chiral phase transition line in the (T, i mu_B) plane of massless QCD. Starting from lattice indications of second-order behavior for N_f >= 2, it derives constraints at general imaginary baryon chemical potential theta_B that must hold even at theta_B = 0, leaving only three minimal scenarios. The favored scenario for N_f >= 3 (and possibly N_f = 2) is a conformal manifold of theta_B-dependent universality classes containing an exactly marginal operator tied to baryon density.

Significance. If the second-order assumption holds, the anomaly-matching argument supplies a non-perturbative constraint that goes beyond conventional Ginzburg-Landau effective theories and raises the possibility of an exactly marginal deformation parametrized by theta_B. This would constitute a qualitatively new feature for hot QCD and could be tested by future lattice studies at imaginary chemical potential.

major comments (2)
  1. [Introduction / Lattice Evidence] The entire chain of reasoning rests on the premise that the chiral transition remains second-order in the strict chiral limit (Introduction and Lattice Evidence paragraphs). Existing lattice results rely on extrapolations in quark mass and volume; for N_f = 2 some studies report weak first-order signals once finite-mass effects are removed. The manuscript supplies no independent analytic argument or new data to establish second-order behavior, so the anomaly constraints and the three scenarios are conditional on an unproven assumption.
  2. [Anomaly Matching section] The claim that anomaly matching at general theta_B directly constrains the theta_B = 0 point (central derivation) assumes that the critical theory at finite theta_B can be continued to theta_B = 0 while remaining a CFT. If the transition becomes first-order for any theta_B, or if the relevant operator becomes relevant, the matching argument does not apply at theta_B = 0. The manuscript does not quantify the range of theta_B over which the CFT description is expected to hold.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Conformal Manifold scenario] Notation for the exactly marginal operator and its relation to baryon density should be introduced with an explicit operator definition or scaling dimension before the conformal-manifold discussion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the text to better clarify the assumptions and scope of the analysis.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Introduction / Lattice Evidence] The entire chain of reasoning rests on the premise that the chiral transition remains second-order in the strict chiral limit (Introduction and Lattice Evidence paragraphs). Existing lattice results rely on extrapolations in quark mass and volume; for N_f = 2 some studies report weak first-order signals once finite-mass effects are removed. The manuscript supplies no independent analytic argument or new data to establish second-order behavior, so the anomaly constraints and the three scenarios are conditional on an unproven assumption.

    Authors: We agree that the entire analysis is conditional on the chiral transition being second-order in the strict chiral limit, as indicated by existing lattice simulations. The manuscript does not provide new lattice data or an independent analytic proof of second-order behavior, as its focus is on deriving non-perturbative constraints from 't Hooft anomaly matching under that assumption. In the revised version we have expanded the Introduction and the Lattice Evidence section to state explicitly that the three minimal scenarios, including the conformal manifold proposal for N_f >= 3, hold only if the transition remains second-order. We have also noted the current uncertainties and possible weak first-order signals reported for N_f = 2 in the literature. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Anomaly Matching section] The claim that anomaly matching at general theta_B directly constrains the theta_B = 0 point (central derivation) assumes that the critical theory at finite theta_B can be continued to theta_B = 0 while remaining a CFT. If the transition becomes first-order for any theta_B, or if the relevant operator becomes relevant, the matching argument does not apply at theta_B = 0. The manuscript does not quantify the range of theta_B over which the CFT description is expected to hold.

    Authors: The anomaly-matching argument proceeds by requiring consistency of any CFT at theta_B = 0 with the 't Hooft anomaly that is present at generic theta_B, under the assumption that a continuous family of critical theories exists along the line in the (T, theta_B) plane. We acknowledge that this requires the CFT description to persist over some interval of theta_B. In the revised manuscript we have added a clarifying paragraph stating that the CFT regime is expected to coincide with the region where lattice results indicate second-order behavior (typically small |theta_B|), but we do not provide a precise quantitative bound because that would require additional non-perturbative input beyond the scope of the present work. If the transition turns first-order at some finite theta_B the direct constraint at zero would need re-examination, though the anomaly structure remains a consistency condition for the proposed scenarios. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Standard anomaly matching on lattice-motivated critical line; no load-bearing self-referential reduction

full rationale

The derivation begins from external lattice results suggesting a second-order chiral transition for N_f ≥ 2 in the massless limit, then applies standard 't Hooft anomaly matching along a line of imaginary baryon chemical potential θ_B to constrain the θ_B = 0 point and enumerate three minimal CFT scenarios. No paper equation redefines an input in terms of its own output, renames a fitted quantity as a prediction, or reduces the central claim to a self-citation chain whose validity is internal to the present work. The assumption of second-order behavior is taken as an external benchmark rather than derived internally, leaving the anomaly-matching step independent of the paper's own fitted parameters or prior results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard anomaly matching and external lattice evidence for second-order transitions; no free parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math 't Hooft anomaly matching for chiral symmetry and baryon number at general θ_B
    Invoked to constrain possible CFT descriptions of the critical line even at θ_B=0.
invented entities (1)
  • conformal manifold of θ_B-dependent universality classes no independent evidence
    purpose: To describe a family of critical theories varying continuously with imaginary chemical potential
    Postulated as the best-motivated scenario consistent with the anomaly constraints and lattice data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5417 in / 1305 out tokens · 43405 ms · 2026-05-15T13:15:56.912186+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Local CFTs extremise $F$

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Local CFTs lie at the extrema of the sphere free energy tilde F for nonlocal CFT lines, and maximize it when unitary.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 138 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 54 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Bazavovet al.(HotQCD), Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials, Phys

    A. Bazavovet al.(HotQCD), Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials, Phys. Lett. B 795, 15 (2019), arXiv:1812.08235 [hep-lat]. 6 The most ambitious conjecture would be that the 3DSU(Nf ) PCM (13) is asymptotically safe [106, 107] and gives a path- integral description of the 3DSU(Nf )θB field theory, such that (schematically)g −2 c ...

  2. [2]

    Borsanyi, Z

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, R. Kara, S. D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, QCD Crossover at Finite Chemical Potential from Lat- tice Simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 052001 (2020), arXiv:2002.02821 [hep-lat]

  3. [3]

    R. D. Pisarski and F. Wilczek, Remarks on the Chiral Phase Transition in Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D29, 338 (1984)

  4. [4]

    F. R. Brown, F. P. Butler, H. Chen, N. H. Christ, Z.-h. 6 Dong, W. Schaffer, L. I. Unger, and A. Vaccarino, On the existence of a phase transition for QCD with three light quarks, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 2491 (1990)

  5. [5]

    Susceptibilities, the Specific Heat and a Cumulant in Two-Flavour QCD

    F. Karsch and E. Laermann, Susceptibilities, the spe- cific heat and a cumulant in two flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. D50, 6954 (1994), arXiv:hep-lat/9406008

  6. [6]

    Chiral Phase Transition in Lattice QCD with Wilson Quarks

    Y. Iwasaki, K. Kanaya, S. Sakai, and T. Yoshie, Chiral phase transition in lattice QCD with Wilson quarks, Z. Phys. C71, 337 (1996), arXiv:hep-lat/9504019

  7. [7]

    Scaling Study of the Two-Flavor Chiral Phase Transition with the Kogut-Susskind Quark Action in Lattice QCD

    S. Aokiet al.(JLQCD), Scaling study of the two flavor chiral phase transition with the Kogut-Susskind quark action in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D57, 3910 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9710048

  8. [8]

    The Chiral Critical Point in 3-Flavour QCD

    F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and C. Schmidt, The Chiral critical point in three-flavor QCD, Phys. Lett. B520, 41 (2001), arXiv:hep-lat/0107020

  9. [9]

    Study of 3-flavor QCD Finite Temperature Phase Transition with Staggered Fermions

    X. Liao, Study of 3 flavor QCD finite temperature phase transition with staggered fermions, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.106, 426 (2002), arXiv:hep-lat/0111013

  10. [10]

    de Forcrand and O

    P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, The QCD phase di- agram for three degenerate flavors and small baryon density, Nucl. Phys. B673, 170 (2003), arXiv:hep- lat/0307020

  11. [11]

    X.-Y. Jin, Y. Kuramashi, Y. Nakamura, S. Takeda, and A. Ukawa, Critical endpoint of the finite temperature phase transition for three flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. D 91, 014508 (2015), arXiv:1411.7461 [hep-lat]

  12. [12]

    Cuteri, O

    F. Cuteri, O. Philipsen, and A. Sciarra, On the order of the QCD chiral phase transition for different numbers of quark flavours, JHEP11, 141, arXiv:2107.12739 [hep- lat]

  13. [13]

    L. Dini, P. Hegde, F. Karsch, A. Lahiri, C. Schmidt, and S. Sharma, Chiral phase transition in three-flavor QCD from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D105, 034510 (2022), arXiv:2111.12599 [hep-lat]

  14. [14]

    Nakamura, Y

    Y. Nakamura, Y. Aoki, S. Hashimoto, I. Kanamori, T. Kaneko, and Y. Zhang, Finite temperature phase transition for three flavor QCD with Möbius-domain wall fermions, PoSLATTICE2021, 080 (2022)

  15. [15]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Aoki, S. Hashimoto, I. Kanamori, T. Kaneko, and Y. Nakamura, Finite temperature QCD phase transition with 3 flavors of Mobius do- main wall fermions, PoSLATTICE2022, 197 (2023), arXiv:2212.10021 [hep-lat]

  16. [16]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Aoki, S. Hashimoto, I. Kanamori, T. Kaneko, and Y. Nakamura, Exploring the QCD phase diagram with three flavors of Möbius do- main wall fermions, PoSLATTICE2023, 203 (2024), arXiv:2401.05066 [hep-lat]

  17. [17]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Aoki, S. Hashimoto, I. Kanamori, T. Kaneko, and Y. Nakamura, Three flavor QCD phase transition with Mobius domain wall fermions, PoS LATTICE2024, 193 (2025), arXiv:2501.15494 [hep- lat]

  18. [18]

    J. P. Klinger, R. Kaiser, and O. Philipsen, The or- der of the chiral phase transition in massless many- flavour lattice QCD, PoSLATTICE2024, 172 (2025), arXiv:2501.19251 [hep-lat]

  19. [19]

    D’Ambrosio, M

    A. D’Ambrosio, M. Fromm, R. Kaiser, and O. Philipsen, On the nature of the QCD chiral phase transition with imaginary chemical potential, arXiv:2512.15418 [hep- lat] (2025), preprint

  20. [20]

    J. P. Klinger, R. Kaiser, O. Philipsen, and J. Schaible, On the phase structure of massless many-flavour QCD with staggered fermions (2026) arXiv:2603.20099 [hep- lat]

  21. [21]

    Fejos, Second-order chiral phase transition in three- flavor quantum chromodynamics?, Phys

    G. Fejos, Second-order chiral phase transition in three- flavor quantum chromodynamics?, Phys. Rev. D105, L071506 (2022), arXiv:2201.07909 [hep-ph]

  22. [22]

    Bernhardt and C

    J. Bernhardt and C. S. Fischer, QCD phase transitions in the light quark chiral limit, Phys. Rev. D108, 114018 (2023), arXiv:2309.06737 [hep-ph]

  23. [23]

    Fejos and T

    G. Fejos and T. Hatsuda, Order of the SU(Nf)×SU(Nf) chiral transition via the functional renormaliza- tion group, Phys. Rev. D110, 016021 (2024), arXiv:2404.00554 [hep-ph]

  24. [24]

    Giacosa, G

    F. Giacosa, G. Kovács, P. Kovács, R. D. Pisarski, and F. Rennecke, Anomalous U(1)A couplings and the Columbia plot, Phys. Rev. D111, 016014 (2025), arXiv:2410.08185 [hep-ph]

  25. [25]

    R. D. Pisarski and F. Rennecke, Conjectures about the ChiralPhaseTransitioninQCDfromAnomalousMulti- Instanton Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 251903 (2024), arXiv:2401.06130 [hep-ph]

  26. [26]

    Anomaly matching in QCD thermal phase transition

    K. Yonekura, Anomaly matching in QCD thermal phase transition, JHEP05, 062, arXiv:1901.08188 [hep-th]

  27. [27]

    High-temperature domain walls of QCD with imaginary chemical potentials

    H. Nishimura and Y. Tanizaki, High-temperature do- main walls of QCD with imaginary chemical potentials, JHEP06, 040, arXiv:1903.04014 [hep-th]

  28. [28]

    S. K. Kobayashi, T. Yokokura, and K. Yonekura, The QCD phase diagram in the space of imaginary chem- ical potential via ’t Hooft anomalies, JHEP08, 132, arXiv:2305.01217 [hep-th]

  29. [29]

    Roberge and N

    A. Roberge and N. Weiss, Gauge Theories With Imagi- nary Chemical Potential and the Phases of QCD, Nucl. Phys.B275, 734 (1986)

  30. [30]

    "Deconfined" quantum critical points

    T. Senthil, A. Vishwanath, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, and M. P. A. Fisher, Deconfined Quantum Critical Points, Science303, 1490 (2004), arXiv:cond-mat/0311326

  31. [31]

    Senthil, L

    T. Senthil, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum criticality beyond the Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm, Phys. Rev. B70, 144407 (2004)

  32. [32]

    Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: a review, arXiv:2306.12638 [cond-mat.str-el] (2023), preprint

    T. Senthil, Deconfined quantum critical points: a review, arXiv:2306.12638 [cond-mat.str-el] (2023), preprint

  33. [33]

    ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spon- taneous chiral symmetry breaking, inRecent Develop- ments in Gauge Theories

    G. ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spon- taneous chiral symmetry breaking, inRecent Develop- ments in Gauge Theories. Proceedings, Nato Advanced Study Institute, Cargese, France, August 26 - September 8, 1979, Vol. 59 (1980) pp. 135–157

  34. [34]

    D. S. Freed, Anomalies and Invertible Field Theories, Proc. Symp. Pure Math.88, 25 (2014), arXiv:1404.7224 [hep-th]

  35. [35]

    Anomalies of discrete symmetries in three dimensions and group cohomology

    A. Kapustin and R. Thorngren, Anomalies of discrete symmetries in three dimensions and group cohomology, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 231602 (2014), arXiv:1403.0617 [hep-th]

  36. [36]

    Fermion Path Integrals And Topological Phases

    E. Witten, Fermion Path Integrals And Topologi- cal Phases, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035001 (2016), arXiv:1508.04715 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

  37. [37]

    Dai-Freed theorem and topological phases of matter

    K. Yonekura, Dai-Freed theorem and topological phases of matter, JHEP09, 022, arXiv:1607.01873 [hep-th]

  38. [38]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Glad- den, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim, Lectures on generalized symmetries, Phys. Rept.1051, 1 (2024), arXiv:2307.07547 [hep-th]

  39. [39]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, Consequences of anomalous 7 Ward identities, Phys. Lett.37B, 95 (1971)

  40. [40]

    Witten, An SU(2) Anomaly, Phys

    E. Witten, An SU(2) Anomaly, Phys. Lett. B117, 324 (1982)

  41. [41]

    A New SU(2) Anomaly

    J. Wang, X.-G. Wen, and E. Witten, A New SU(2) Anomaly, J. Math. Phys.60, 052301 (2019), arXiv:1810.00844 [hep-th]

  42. [42]

    Frishman, A

    Y. Frishman, A. Schwimmer, T. Banks, and S. Yankielowicz, The Axial Anomaly and the Bound State Spectrum in Confining Theories, Nucl. Phys. B177, 157 (1981)

  43. [43]

    S. R. Coleman and B. Grossman, ’t Hooft’s Consistency Condition as a Consequence of Analyticity and Unitar- ity, Nucl. Phys.B203, 205 (1982)

  44. [44]

    Nonperturbative investigations of SU(3) gauge theory with eight dynamical flavors

    T. Appelquistet al.(Lattice Strong Dynamics), Non- perturbative investigations of SU(3) gauge theory with eight dynamical flavors, Phys. Rev. D99, 014509 (2019), arXiv:1807.08411 [hep-lat]

  45. [45]

    J. Kuti, Z. Fodor, K. Holland, and C. H. Wong, From ten-flavortestsoftheβ-functiontoα s attheZ-pole,PoS LATTICE2021, 321 (2022), arXiv:2203.15847 [hep- lat]

  46. [46]

    Ingoldby (Lattice Strong Dynamics), Hidden Con- formal Symmetry from Eight Flavors, PoSLAT- TICE2023, 091 (2024), arXiv:2401.00267 [hep-lat]

    J. Ingoldby (Lattice Strong Dynamics), Hidden Con- formal Symmetry from Eight Flavors, PoSLAT- TICE2023, 091 (2024), arXiv:2401.00267 [hep-lat]

  47. [47]

    Hasenfratz, E

    A. Hasenfratz, E. T. Neil, Y. Shamir, B. Svetitsky, and O. Witzel, Infrared fixed point of the SU(3) gauge the- ory with Nf=10 flavors, Phys. Rev. D108, L071503 (2023), arXiv:2306.07236 [hep-lat]

  48. [48]

    A.HasenfratzandC.T.Peterson,Infraredfixedpointin the massless twelve-flavor SU(3) gauge-fermion system, Phys. Rev. D109, 114507 (2024), arXiv:2402.18038 [hep-lat]

  49. [49]

    Bergner, Prospects for lattice field theory beyond the Standard Model, PoSLATTICE2024, 007 (2025)

    G. Bergner, Prospects for lattice field theory beyond the Standard Model, PoSLATTICE2024, 007 (2025)

  50. [50]

    Witten, Global aspects of current algebra, Nucl

    E. Witten, Global aspects of current algebra, Nucl. Phys.B223, 422 (1983)

  51. [51]

    Witten, Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Con- finement, Nucl

    E. Witten, Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Con- finement, Nucl. Phys. B223, 433 (1983)

  52. [52]

    Polchinski, Scale and Conformal Invariance in Quan- tum Field Theory, Nucl

    J. Polchinski, Scale and Conformal Invariance in Quan- tum Field Theory, Nucl. Phys. B303, 226 (1988)

  53. [53]

    What Maxwell Theory in D<>4 teaches us about scale and conformal invariance

    S. El-Showk, Y. Nakayama, and S. Rychkov, What Maxwell Theory in D<>4 teaches us about scale and conformal invariance, Nucl. Phys. B848, 578 (2011), arXiv:1101.5385 [hep-th]

  54. [54]

    Scale invariance vs conformal invariance

    Y. Nakayama, Scale invariance vs conformal invariance, Phys. Rept.569, 1 (2015), arXiv:1302.0884 [hep-th]

  55. [55]

    Scale invariance implies conformal invariance for the three-dimensional Ising model

    B. Delamotte, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Scale in- variance implies conformal invariance for the three- dimensional Ising model, Phys. Rev. E93, 012144 (2016), arXiv:1501.01776 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  56. [56]

    M. F. Paulos, S. Rychkov, B. C. van Rees, and B. Zan, Conformal Invariance in the Long-Range Ising Model, Nucl. Phys. B902, 246 (2016), arXiv:1509.00008 [hep- th]

  57. [57]

    Meneses, J

    S. Meneses, J. Penedones, S. Rychkov, J. M. Viana Parente Lopes, and P. Yvernay, A structural test for the conformal invariance of the critical 3d Ising model, JHEP04, 115, arXiv:1802.02319 [hep-th]

  58. [58]

    Global inconsistency, 't Hooft anomaly, and level crossing in quantum mechanics

    Y. Kikuchi and Y. Tanizaki, Global inconsistency, ’t Hooft anomaly, and level crossing in quantum me- chanics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2017, 113B05 (2017), arXiv:1708.01962 [hep-th]

  59. [59]

    Córdova, D

    C. Córdova, D. S. Freed, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, Anomalies in the Space of Coupling Constants and Their Dynamical Applications I, SciPost Phys.8, 001 (2020), arXiv:1905.09315 [hep-th]

  60. [60]

    Córdova, D

    C. Córdova, D. S. Freed, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, Anomalies in the Space of Coupling Constants and Their Dynamical Applications II, SciPost Phys.8, 002 (2020), arXiv:1905.13361 [hep-th]

  61. [61]

    Heidenreich, J

    B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius, and I. Valenzuela, Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spectrum, JHEP 09, 203, arXiv:2104.07036 [hep-th]

  62. [62]

    García-Valdecasas, M

    E. García-Valdecasas, M. Reece, and M. Suzuki, Monopole breaking of Chern-Weil symmetries, SciPost Phys.18, 162 (2025), arXiv:2408.00067 [hep-th]

  63. [63]

    Yu, Gauging in parameter space: A top-down perspective, Phys

    X. Yu, Gauging in parameter space: A top-down perspective, Phys. Rev. D112, 025020 (2025), arXiv:2411.14997 [hep-th]

  64. [64]

    Najjar, L

    M. Najjar, L. Santilli, and Y.-N. Wang, (−1)-form sym- metries from M-theory and SymTFTs, JHEP03, 134, arXiv:2411.19683 [hep-th]

  65. [65]

    Aloni, E

    D. Aloni, E. Garcia-Valdecasas, M. Reece, and M. Suzuki, Spontaneously broken(−1)-formU(1)sym- metries, SciPost Phys.17, 031 (2024), arXiv:2402.00117 [hep-th]

  66. [66]

    L. Lin, D. Robbins, and S. Roy, Decomposition and (non-invertible) (−1)-form symmetries from the symmetry topological field theory, JHEP09, 131, arXiv:2503.21862 [hep-th]

  67. [67]

    Robbins and S

    D. Robbins and S. Roy, (−1)-form symmetries and anomaly shifting from symmetry topological field the- ory, Phys. Rev. D112, 105020 (2025)

  68. [68]

    Nonperturbative effects of Topological Theta-term

    C. Xu and A. W. W. Ludwig, Nonperturbative effects of TopologicalΘ-term on Principal Chiral Nonlinear Sigma Models in (2+1) dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 200405 (2013), arXiv:1112.5303 [cond-mat.str-el]

  69. [69]

    D. J. Gross, R. D. Pisarski, and L. G. Yaffe, QCD and Instantons at Finite Temperature, Rev. Mod. Phys.53, 43 (1981)

  70. [70]

    J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale,Finite-Temperature Field Theory: Principles and Applications (Cambridge Mono- graphs on Mathematical Physics), 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

  71. [71]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Wil- lett, Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP02, 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

  72. [72]

    Seiberg and S

    N. Seiberg and S. Seifnashri, Symmetry trans- mutation and anomaly matching, JHEP09, 014, arXiv:2505.08618 [hep-th]

  73. [73]

    Roberge-Weiss endpoint and chiral symmetry restoration in $N_f = 2+1$ QCD

    C. Bonati, E. Calore, M. D’Elia, M. Mesiti, F. Negro, F. Sanfilippo, S. F. Schifano, G. Silvi, and R. Tripic- cione, Roberge-Weiss endpoint and chiral symmetry restoration inNf = 2+1QCD, Phys. Rev.D99, 014502 (2019), arXiv:1807.02106 [hep-lat]

  74. [74]

    Cuteri, J

    F. Cuteri, J. Goswami, F. Karsch, A. Lahiri, M. Neu- mann, O. Philipsen, C. Schmidt, and A. Sciarra, Toward the chiral phase transition in the Roberge-Weiss plane, Phys. Rev. D106, 014510 (2022), arXiv:2205.12707 [hep-lat]

  75. [75]

    T. D. Cohen, The High temperature phase of QCD and U(1)-A symmetry, Phys. Rev. D54, R1867 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9601216

  76. [76]

    S. H. Lee and T. Hatsuda, U-a(1) symmetry restora- tion in QCD with N(f) flavors, Phys. Rev. D54, R1871 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9601373

  77. [77]

    T.D.CohenandL.Y.Glozman,Doesoneobservechiral 8 symmetry restoration in baryon spectrum?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A17, 1327 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0201242

  78. [78]

    Phase diagrams in the three-flavor Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model with the Polyakov loop

    K. Fukushima, Phase diagrams in the three-flavor Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with the Polyakov loop, Phys. Rev. D77, 114028 (2008), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 78, 039902 (2008)], arXiv:0803.3318 [hep-ph]

  79. [79]

    S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, and Y. Taniguchi, Chiral symme- try restoration, eigenvalue density of Dirac operator and axial U(1) anomaly at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 86, 114512 (2012), arXiv:1209.2061 [hep-lat]

  80. [80]

    Relevance of the axial anomaly at the finite-temperature chiral transition in QCD

    A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Relevance of the axial anomaly at the finite-temperature chiral transition in QCD, Phys. Rev. D88, 105018 (2013), arXiv:1309.5446 [hep-lat]

Showing first 80 references.