pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16551 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Photon rings and shadows of black holes with non-minimal couplings between curvature and electromagnetic field

Zhixiang Yin , Changjun Gao , Yun-Long Zhang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords ringscouplingsblackcouplingphotonfieldhigher-ordernon-minimal
0
0 comments X

The pith

Three distinct non-minimal curvature-EM couplings produce different enlargements or reductions of black hole shadows and alter photon ring separations in characteristic ways.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Black holes bend light into rings and cast shadows whose sizes depend on the spacetime geometry near the event horizon. The authors add three possible extra terms to the usual Einstein-Maxwell action that let the electromagnetic field strength interact directly with the curvature of spacetime. These terms are motivated by both classical effective theories and quantum corrections. Using a series expansion around the Schwarzschild solution, they obtain approximate metrics for each coupling. They then trace light rays backward from a distant observer to map the shadow boundary and the locations of the bright photon rings. The first coupling slightly enlarges the shadow and the gap between the main ring and its first image while leaving higher-order gaps almost unchanged. The second coupling makes the shadow much larger and squeezes the higher-order rings closer together. The third coupling shrinks the shadow, makes the first two rings nearly overlap (increasing brightness), and spreads the higher rings farther apart. These differences remain visible in simulated images within the resolution expected from current and near-future telescopes.

Core claim

The coupling FμνFσρRμνσρ significantly enlarges the shadow and the zeroth-first ring separation but rapidly suppresses higher-order ring spacings, while F²R reduces shadow size, makes zeroth and first rings nearly coincide, and increases higher-order separations.

Load-bearing premise

The series expansion method around the Schwarzschild background remains accurate enough near the photon sphere for the chosen coupling strengths; the paper does not quantify the radius of convergence or compare with exact numerical solutions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16551 by Changjun Gao, Yun-Long Zhang, Zhixiang Yin.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The first four transfer functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Function profile of emission intensity Eq. (22). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Effects of couplings on the size of photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Effects of couplings on the size of horizon. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Schematic diagram of photon ring formation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Effects of couplings on the radius of ISCO. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Effects of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: shows that the radii of all photon rings de￾crease as α2 increases. Notably, the separation between the zeroth- and first-order photon rings shrinks contin￾uously and becomes nearly vanishing for α2 >∼ 60 M2 , 0th FIG. 11: Effects of α1F σ ν FσρRνρ on the size of photon rings. 0th FIG. 12: Effects of α2F 2R on the size of photon rings. where the two rings almost overlap. In contrast, the sep￾arations amon… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: First four transfer functions for four different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Observed intensity for four different choices of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: From these images, we observe that the size of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Influence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: These images demonstrate that the overall size of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: First four transfer functions for four different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Observed intensity for four different choices of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: Influence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20: A zoomed-in version of Fig. 19d. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21: First three transfer functions for four different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22: Observed intensity for four different choices of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23: Influence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24: Geometric relations between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25: The camera screen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26: Observer’s field of view [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_26.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate black holes with non-minimal couplings between the electromagnetic field and spacetime curvature, focusing on their event horizons, shadows, and photon rings. Such couplings can naturally arise from both classical effective field theories of gravity and quantum effects in curved spacetime. Starting from a general action with three independent coupling terms, we derive static and spherically symmetric black hole solutions using a series expansion method. We find that all couplings enlarge the event horizon and photon sphere, while their observational consequences differ. The coupling $F^\mu_{\ \nu}F_{\mu\rho}R^{\nu\rho}$ slightly increases the shadow size and the separation between the zeroth- and first-order photon rings, leaving higher-order spacings nearly unchanged. The coupling $F_{\mu\nu}F_{\sigma\rho}R^{\mu\nu\sigma\rho}$ significantly enlarges the shadow and the zeroth-first ring separation, but rapidly suppresses the spacing between higher-order rings. In contrast, the $F^2R$ coupling reduces the shadow size and causes the zeroth- and first-order rings to nearly coincide, leading to an enhanced brightness, while increasing the separation of higher-order rings and leaving them easier to resolve observationally. We further generate black hole images via backward ray tracing and confirm these features within the observationally resolvable regime. These findings can make observational constraints on the non-minimal couplings or might provide new evidence for the modifications to gravity caused by classical or quantum effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives static spherically symmetric black hole solutions in Einstein-Maxwell theory augmented by three non-minimal curvature-electromagnetic couplings, using a perturbative series expansion around the Schwarzschild metric. It then computes the resulting event horizons, photon spheres, shadow sizes, and photon ring separations, claiming that the couplings produce qualitatively distinct observational signatures (e.g., FμνFσρRμνσρ enlarges the shadow and zeroth-first ring gap while suppressing higher-order spacings, while F²R reduces shadow size and makes zeroth and first rings nearly coincide). These features are illustrated with backward ray-traced images.

Significance. If the perturbative metrics remain accurate near the photon sphere, the work supplies concrete, distinguishable predictions for how non-minimal couplings affect EHT-accessible observables and could help constrain effective-field-theory or quantum-gravity corrections. The explicit comparison of the three couplings and the use of ray tracing to generate images are strengths that make the claims falsifiable with current or near-future data.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3] §3 (series expansion of the metric): all reported changes in shadow radius and photon-ring separations are computed from metric functions obtained by substituting the ansatz into the modified field equations and solving order-by-order in the coupling constants. No radius-of-convergence estimate or direct comparison against numerically integrated exact solutions is provided for the photon-sphere region (r≈3M). If O(λ²) or non-perturbative corrections alter the effective potential for null geodesics by even a few percent, the claimed differential impacts (enlargement vs. suppression of ring spacings) would not hold.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'all couplings enlarge the event horizon and photon sphere' but does not specify the perturbative order retained in the metric functions; adding this information would clarify the domain of validity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the ray-traced images do not indicate the range of impact parameters or the resolution used to resolve higher-order rings; this makes it harder to assess which features lie within the 'observationally resolvable regime' mentioned in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and for identifying a key point about the perturbative expansion. We address the concern regarding the validity of the series solutions near the photon sphere below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (series expansion of the metric): all reported changes in shadow radius and photon-ring separations are computed from metric functions obtained by substituting the ansatz into the modified field equations and solving order-by-order in the coupling constants. No radius-of-convergence estimate or direct comparison against numerically integrated exact solutions is provided for the photon-sphere region (r≈3M). If O(λ²) or non-perturbative corrections alter the effective potential for null geodesics by even a few percent, the claimed differential impacts (enlargement vs. suppression of ring spacings) would not hold.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of the perturbative regime's validity at r ≈ 3M would strengthen the manuscript. All reported differences in shadow radii and photon-ring separations are first-order effects in the coupling constants λ. Within the effective-field-theory framework adopted in the paper, the couplings are assumed small enough that O(λ²) corrections remain negligible; the qualitative distinctions between the three couplings (e.g., enlargement versus suppression of specific ring spacings) already appear at linear order. In the revised version we will add a short paragraph in §3 that estimates the size of the next-order metric corrections at the photon sphere by inspecting the structure of the modified field equations, thereby providing a rough radius-of-convergence indicator. A full numerical integration of the exact, non-perturbative equations for each coupling is computationally demanding and lies outside the analytic scope of the present work; we therefore retain the perturbative approach while clarifying its domain of applicability. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain is self-contained from action to observables

full rationale

The paper begins with a general action containing three independent non-minimal coupling terms, substitutes a static spherically symmetric metric ansatz, and obtains the metric functions by direct series expansion of the resulting modified field equations around the Schwarzschild background. Photon-sphere locations, shadow radii, and ring separations are then computed from these metric functions via the standard null-geodesic effective-potential condition. No parameters are fitted to data and subsequently relabeled as predictions; no uniqueness theorems or ansatze are imported via self-citation; and no step reduces by construction to its own input. The reported differences among the three couplings therefore follow from the explicit series solutions rather than from any definitional or self-referential loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a modified Einstein-Maxwell action with three non-minimal terms, static spherical symmetry, and a perturbative series solution; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • three coupling constants
    The coefficients of the three curvature-EM interaction terms are free parameters of the model; their values are not fitted to data but are varied to illustrate qualitative effects.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The spacetime is static and spherically symmetric.
    Invoked to reduce the metric to Schwarzschild-like form before series expansion.
  • domain assumption The non-minimal couplings arise from classical effective field theory or quantum effects.
    Motivational statement; no derivation of the specific three terms is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5566 in / 1481 out tokens · 42298 ms · 2026-05-10T08:20:40.796686+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Equations of motion 14

  2. [2]

    Equations of motion for numerical integration 17 C

    Series solution 16 B. Equations of motion for numerical integration 17 C. Backward ray-tracing approach 18

  3. [3]

    Coordinate transformation 18

  4. [4]

    Backward ray-tracing approach 19 References 20 arXiv:2604.16551v1 [gr-qc] 17 Apr 2026 2 I. INTRODUCTION The study of black hole shadows and photon rings has attracted considerable attention since the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) Collaboration produced black hole im- ages of M87* [1–9] and Sgr A*[10–17]. Black hole shad- ows and photon rings encode rich i...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    camera screen

    computed the coefficientsα 1,α 2 andα 3 by calculat- ing the one-loop vacuum-polarization diagrams by using the Schwinger–de Witt’s effective action approach. They found thatα i ∝ e2 m2e witheandm e the charge and mass of electrons. It is important to note that Drummond and Hathrell’s analysis is suitable for electromagnetic waves with energies much less ...

  6. [6]

    (1) and Lagrangian Eq.(5)

    Equations of motion Let’s start with the action Eq. (1) and Lagrangian Eq.(5). Utilizing chain rule, we can obtain the equation δS δΞ = δgµν δΞ δS δgµν = 0,(A1) where Ξ =U, N, ϕdenotes the undetermined func- tion in the metric ansatz Eq. (3), and the fact that the energy-momentum tenser of metric vanishes, i.e.T µν = 2√−g δS δgµν = 0, is also taken into a...

  7. [7]

    (A2), Eq

    Series solution Since analytic solutions to Eq. (A2), Eq. (A3), and Eq. (A4) are hard to obtain, we seek for series solu- tions. Given that the spacetime solution is expected to be asymptotically flat, the series can be assumed to take the following form ϕ= c1 r + c2 r2 + c3 r3 + c4 r4 + c5 r5 +· · ·, N=b 0 + b1 r + b2 r2 + b3 r3 + b4 r4 + b5 r5 +· · ·, U...

  8. [8]

    the camera screen

    Coordinate transformation The geodesic of photonss(λ) obtained from EoM, Eq. (17) and Eq. (19), is expressed in the Boyer– Lindquist coordinates with tangent vector ˙s= ˙t∂t + ˙r∂r + ˙θ∂θ + ˙φ∂φ ,(C1) which do not correspond to the coordinates perceived by the observer. Therefore, a series of coordinate transfor- mations, as illustrated in Fig. 24, are re...

    2000

  9. [9]

    Backward ray-tracing approach In principle, the construction of the black hole shadow requires tracing photons from the source, after their de- flection by the black hole, to their eventual detection by the observer. Since the gravitational influence of the black hole is confined to a finite region, the vast majority of photons from the source either expe...

  10. [10]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L2 (2019), arXiv:1906.11239 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L3 (2019), arXiv:1906.11240 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Cen- tral Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L4 (2019), arXiv:1906.11241 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L5 (2019), arXiv:1906.11242 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L6 (2019), arXiv:1906.11243 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VII. Polariza- tion of the Ring,

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VII. Polariza- tion of the Ring, Astrophys. J. Lett.910, L12 (2021), arXiv:2105.01169 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Magnetic Field Structure near The Event Horizon,

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Magnetic Field Structure near The Event Horizon, Astrophys. J. Lett. 910, L13 (2021), arXiv:2105.01173 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IX. Detection of Near-horizon Circular Polarization,

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IX. Detection of Near- horizon Circular Polarization, Astrophys. J. Lett.957, L20 (2023), arXiv:2311.10976 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagit- tarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. EHT and Multiwavelength Observations, Data Processing, and Calibration, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L13 (2022), arXiv:2311.08679 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], First Sagittar- ius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagit- tarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Imaging of the Galactic Center Supermassive Black Hole, Astro- phys. J. Lett.930, L14 (2022), arXiv:2311.09479 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagit- tarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Vari- ability, Morphology, and Black Hole Mass, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L15 (2022), arXiv:2311.08697 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagit- tarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Testing Astrophysical Models of the Galactic Center Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L16 (2022), arXiv:2311.09478 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagit- tarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagit- tarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Test- ing the Black Hole Metric, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L17 (2022), arXiv:2311.09484 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagit- tarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagit- tarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VII. Polar- ization of the Ring, Astrophys. J. Lett.964, L25 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagit- tarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagit- tarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Phys- ical Interpretation of the Polarized Ring, Astrophys. J. Lett.964, L26 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    S. E. Gralla, A. Lupsasca, and D. P. Marrone, The shape of the black hole photon ring: A precise test of strong- field general relativity, Phys. Rev. D102, 124004 (2020), arXiv:2008.03879 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    S. E. Gralla, Can the EHT M87 results be used to test general relativity?, Phys. Rev. D103, 024023 (2021), arXiv:2010.08557 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    S. H. V¨ olkel, E. Barausse, N. Franchini, and A. E. Broderick, EHT tests of the strong-field regime of gen- eral relativity, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 21LT01 (2021), arXiv:2011.06812 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Testing General Relativity with the Event Horizon Telescope,

    D. Psaltis, Testing General Relativity with the Event Horizon Telescope, Gen. Rel. Grav.51, 137 (2019), arXiv:1806.09740 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    M. D. Johnsonet al., Universal interferometric signa- tures of a black hole’s photon ring, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz1310 (2020), arXiv:1907.04329 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Photon Regions and Shadows of Kerr-Newman-NUT Black Holes with a Cosmological Constant

    A. Grenzebach, V. Perlick, and C. L¨ ammerzahl, Photon Regions and Shadows of Kerr-Newman-NUT Black Holes with a Cosmological Constant, Phys. Rev. D89, 124004 (2014), arXiv:1403.5234 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  33. [33]

    Wei, Y.-C

    S.-W. Wei, Y.-C. Zou, Y.-X. Liu, and R. B. Mann, Cur- vature radius and Kerr black hole shadow, JCAP08, 030, 21 arXiv:1904.07710 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 1904

  34. [34]

    ¨Ovg¨ un,˙I

    A. ¨Ovg¨ un,˙I. Sakallı, and J. Saavedra, Shadow cast and Deflection angle of Kerr-Newman-Kasuya spacetime, JCAP10, 041, arXiv:1807.00388 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    M. Wang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Shadow casted by a Konoplya-Zhidenko rotating non-Kerr black hole, JCAP 10, 051, arXiv:1707.09451 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Roy and S

    R. Roy and S. Chakrabarti, Study on black hole shadows in asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D102, 024059 (2020), arXiv:2003.14107 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Shaikh, Black hole shadow in a general rotating space- time obtained through Newman-Janis algorithm, Phys

    R. Shaikh, Black hole shadow in a general rotating space- time obtained through Newman-Janis algorithm, Phys. Rev. D100, 024028 (2019), arXiv:1904.08322 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Shapes of rotating nonsingular black hole shadows

    M. Amir and S. G. Ghosh, Shapes of rotating nonsingu- lar black hole shadows, Phys. Rev. D94, 024054 (2016), arXiv:1603.06382 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    Shadow of rotating regular black holes

    A. Abdujabbarov, M. Amir, B. Ahmedov, and S. G. Ghosh, Shadow of rotating regular black holes, Phys. Rev. D93, 104004 (2016), arXiv:1604.03809 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically symmetric black hole

    V. Perlick, O. Y. Tsupko, and G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically symmetric black hole, Phys. Rev. D92, 104031 (2015), arXiv:1507.04217 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, O. Y. Tsupko, and V. Per- lick, Shadow of a black hole at local and cosmo- logical distances, PoSMULTIF2019, 009 (2019), arXiv:1910.10514 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    M. Wang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Shadows of Bonnor black dihole by chaotic lensing, Phys. Rev. D97, 064029 (2018), arXiv:1710.07172 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    M. Wang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Effect of gravitational wave on shadow of a Schwarzschild black hole, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 509 (2021), arXiv:1908.04527 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    R. C. Pantig and E. T. Rodulfo, Rotating dirty black hole and its shadow, Chin. J. Phys.68, 236 (2020), arXiv:2003.06829 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Jusufi, M

    K. Jusufi, M. Jamil, and T. Zhu, Shadows of Sgr A ∗ black hole surrounded by superfluid dark matter halo, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 354 (2020), arXiv:2005.05299 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Meng, X.-M

    Y. Meng, X.-M. Kuang, X.-J. Wang, B. Wang, and J.-P. Wu, Images from disk and spherical accretions of hairy Schwarzschild black holes, Phys. Rev. D108, 064013 (2023), arXiv:2306.10459 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Meng, X.-M

    Y. Meng, X.-M. Kuang, X.-J. Wang, B. Wang, and J.- P. Wu, Images of hairy Reissner–Nordstr¨ om black hole illuminated by static accretions, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 305 (2024), arXiv:2401.05634 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    M. A. Raza, J. Rayimbaev, F. Sarikulov, M. Zubair, B. Ahmedov, and Z. Stuchlik, Shadow of novel rotating black hole in GR coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics and constraints from EHT results, Phys. Dark Univ.44, 101488 (2024), arXiv:2311.15784 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Amarilla and E

    L. Amarilla and E. F. Eiroa, Shadow of a rotating braneworld black hole, Phys. Rev. D85, 064019 (2012), arXiv:1112.6349 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2012

  50. [50]

    Zhang and M

    M. Zhang and M. Guo, Can shadows reflect phase struc- tures of black holes?, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 790 (2020), arXiv:1909.07033 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Lu and H.-D

    H. Lu and H.-D. Lyu, Schwarzschild black holes have the largest size, Phys. Rev. D101, 044059 (2020), arXiv:1911.02019 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Wang, Y.-M

    H.-M. Wang, Y.-M. Xu, and S.-W. Wei, Shadows of Kerr- like black holes in a modified gravity theory, JCAP03, 046, arXiv:1810.12767 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Kumar, B

    R. Kumar, B. P. Singh, and S. G. Ghosh, Shadow and deflection angle of rotating black hole in asymp- totically safe gravity, Annals Phys.420, 168252 (2020), arXiv:1904.07652 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Gravitational deflection of light and shadow cast by rotating Kalb-Ramond black holes,

    R. Kumar, S. G. Ghosh, and A. Wang, Gravitational deflection of light and shadow cast by rotating Kalb- Ramond black holes, Phys. Rev. D101, 104001 (2020), arXiv:2001.00460 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Kumar and S

    R. Kumar and S. G. Ghosh, Rotating black holes in 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and its shadow, JCAP 07, 053, arXiv:2003.08927 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2003

  56. [56]

    R. A. Hennigar, M. B. J. Poshteh, and R. B. Mann, Shad- ows, Signals, and Stability in Einsteinian Cubic Gravity, Phys. Rev. D97, 064041 (2018), arXiv:1801.03223 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    ¨Ovg¨ un,˙I

    A. ¨Ovg¨ un,˙I. Sakallı, J. Saavedra, and C. Leiva, Shadow cast of noncommutative black holes in Rastall gravity, Mod. Phys. Lett. A35, 2050163 (2020), arXiv:1906.05954 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Contreras, J

    E. Contreras, J. M. Ramirez-Velasquez, ´A. Rinc´ on, G. Panotopoulos, and P. Bargue˜ no, Black hole shadow of a rotating polytropic black hole by the Newman–Janis algorithm without complexification, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 802 (2019), arXiv:1905.11443 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Contreras, ´A

    E. Contreras, ´A. Rinc´ on, G. Panotopoulos, and P. Bar- gue˜ no, Geodesic analysis and black hole shadows on a general non-extremal rotating black hole in five- dimensional gauged supergravity, Annals Phys.432, 168567 (2021), arXiv:2010.03734 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Ma and H

    L. Ma and H. Lu, Bounds on photon spheres and shad- ows of charged black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet- Maxwell gravity, Phys. Lett. B807, 135535 (2020), arXiv:1912.05569 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    Rotating black holes withoutZ 2 symmetry and their shadow images,

    C.-Y. Chen, Rotating black holes withoutZ 2 sym- 22 metry and their shadow images, JCAP05, 040, arXiv:2004.01440 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2004

  62. [62]

    Eslam Panah, K

    B. Eslam Panah, K. Jafarzade, and S. H. Hendi, Charged 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-AdS black holes: Shadow, en- ergy emission, deflection angle and heat engine, Nucl. Phys. B961, 115269 (2020), arXiv:2004.04058 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    Zeng, H.-Q

    X.-X. Zeng, H.-Q. Zhang, and H. Zhang, Shadows and photon spheres with spherical accretions in the four- dimensional Gauss–Bonnet black hole, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 872 (2020), arXiv:2004.12074 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    J. Peng, M. Guo, and X.-H. Feng, Influence of quan- tum correction on black hole shadows, photon rings, and lensing rings, Chin. Phys. C45, 085103 (2021), arXiv:2008.00657 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    Belhaj, H

    A. Belhaj, H. Belmahi, M. Benali, W. El Hadri, H. El Moumni, and E. Torrente-Lujan, Shadows of 5D black holes from string theory, Phys. Lett. B812, 136025 (2021), arXiv:2008.13478 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    M. Guo, Z. Zhong, J. Wang, and S. Gao, Light rings and long-lived modes in quasiblack hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D105, 024049 (2022), arXiv:2108.08967 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Xiong, Y.-Z

    S.-H. Xiong, Y.-Z. Li, X.-M. Kuang, and J. Matyjasek, The shadow and quasinormal modes of the asymptoti- cally flat hairy black holes with a dilaton potential, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1143 (2025), arXiv:2508.03270 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Dastan, R

    S. Dastan, R. Saffari, and S. Soroushfar, Shadow of a charged rotating black hole in f(R) gravity, Eur. Phys. J. Plus137, 1002 (2022), arXiv:1606.06994 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    A. B. Balakin and J. P. S. Lemos, Non-minimal coupling for the gravitational and electromagnetic fields: a general system of equations, Classical and Quantum Gravity22, 1867–1880 (2005)

    2005

  70. [70]

    A. B. Balakin, V. V. Bochkarev, and J. P. S. Lemos, Non-minimal coupling for the gravitational and electro- magnetic fields: Black hole solutions and solitons, Phys. Rev. D77, 084013 (2008), arXiv:0712.4066 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2008

  71. [71]

    M. S. Turner and L. M. Widrow, Inflation-produced, large-scale magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D37, 2743 (1988)

    1988

  72. [72]

    G. W. Horndeski, Conservation of charge and the Einstein–Maxwell field equations, Journal of Mathematical Physics17, 1980 (1976), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article- pdf/17/11/1980/19259474/1980 1 online.pdf

    1980

  73. [73]

    Stability of Horndeski vector-tensor interactions

    J. Beltran Jimenez, R. Durrer, L. Heisenberg, and M. Thorsrud, Stability of Horndeski vector-tensor inter- actions, JCAP10, 064, arXiv:1308.1867 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  74. [74]

    I. T. Drummond and S. Hathrell, QED vacuum polar- ization in a background gravitational field and its effect on the velocity of photons, Physical Review D22, 343 (1980)

    1980

  75. [75]

    Bastianelli, J

    F. Bastianelli, J. M. Davila, and C. Schubert, Gravita- tional corrections to the Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian, JHEP03, 086, arXiv:0812.4849 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  76. [76]

    Knorr and A

    B. Knorr and A. Platania, Unearthing the intersections: positivity bounds, weak gravity conjecture, and asymp- totic safety landscapes from photon-graviton flows, JHEP 03, 003, arXiv:2405.08860 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  77. [77]

    A. B. Balakin and A. E. Zayats, Non-minimal Wu- Yang monopole, Phys. Lett. B644, 294 (2007), arXiv:gr- qc/0612019

    work page arXiv 2007

  78. [78]

    H. A. Buchdahl, On a Lagrangian for non-minimally cou- pled gravitational and electromagnetic fields, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General12, 1037 (1979)

    1979

  79. [79]

    Carballo-Rubio, H

    R. Carballo-Rubio, H. Delaporte, A. Eichhorn, and P. G. S. Fernandes, Nonminimal light-curvature cou- plings and black-hole imaging, Phys. Rev. D112, 103016 (2025), arXiv:2505.21431 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Jana and S

    S. Jana and S. Shankaranarayanan, Non-Minimally Cou- pled Electromagnetic Fields and Observable Implications for Primordial Black Holes, Universe10, 270 (2024), arXiv:2110.06056 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.