pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23848 · v1 · pith:E4G7S37Nnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.quant-gas

A new Ising/tricritical-Ising interface: From {W}₃ symmetry to Rydberg atoms

Ant\'onio Antunes , Junchen Rong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 03:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords Ising CFTTricritical Isingconformal interfaceW3 symmetrydefect CFTnon-invertible symmetriesRydberg atomsmodular invariance
0
0 comments X

The pith

A new conformal interface connects the Ising and tricritical Ising models through emergent W3 symmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper identifies a new conformal interface between the Ising critical point and the tricritical Ising point. This interface is described by a defect conformal field theory whose spectrum and couplings are fixed by an emergent W3 chiral symmetry together with modular invariance and non-invertible symmetry consistency. The construction yields explicit predictions for defect operators and mixed boundary conditions. These predictions are framed for direct tests in Rydberg atom arrays that realize the corresponding spin chains.

Core claim

We find a new conformal interface between the Tricritical Ising (TIM) and the Ising CFT. The structure of the observables hinges on a newly discovered pattern of emergent W3 chiral symmetry for the Tricritical-Ising/Ising interface. The analysis emphasizes non-invertible symmetries and consistency under modular transformations, and uses defect couplings and the defect spectrum -- including in the case of mixed boundary conditions -- to make sharp experimental predictions.

What carries the argument

The emergent W3 chiral symmetry that fixes the spectrum and couplings of the defect CFT for the TIM-Ising interface.

If this is right

  • The defect spectrum and operator couplings are determined exactly by W3 symmetry, modular invariance, and non-invertible symmetry constraints.
  • Mixed boundary conditions produce additional, symmetry-protected observables that can be computed explicitly.
  • Rydberg atom arrays provide a concrete platform where the predicted defect spectrum can be measured.
  • Non-invertible symmetries restrict which interfaces between the Ising and TIM models are allowed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same W3 emergence pattern may appear in interfaces between other pairs of minimal models.
  • Rydberg implementations could allow controlled study of how non-invertible symmetries are preserved or broken at the interface.
  • The construction supplies a template for deriving continuum predictions from lattice models that share the same emergent symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The interface is fully captured by a defect CFT whose spectrum and couplings are fixed by the emergent W3 symmetry together with modular invariance and non-invertible symmetry consistency, without additional relevant operators.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of the defect operator spectrum or couplings in a Rydberg atom array realizing the TIM-Ising interface that deviates from the degeneracies and values fixed by W3 symmetry and modular invariance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23848 by Ant\'onio Antunes, Junchen Rong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: A conformal interface on the plane becomes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The phase transition on the Ising/TIM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The states of Ising/TIM interface at critical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The open-string sector spectrum of mixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The open-string sector spectrum of mixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Using Rydberg atoms to realize the conformal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The Tri-Ising interface with the KW topological interface on the Ising side and the tricritical Ising side. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider interfaces between critical spin-chains in different universality classes, described in the continuum limit by defect/interface conformal field theory (DCFT/ICFT). We find a new conformal interface between the Tricritical Ising (TIM) and the Ising CFT. We also explore the possibility of its experimental realizations in the context of Rydberg atom arrays. Our analysis emphasizes non-invertible symmetries and consistency under modular transformations, and uses defect couplings and the defect spectrum -- including in the case of mixed boundary conditions -- to make sharp experimental predictions. The structure of the observables hinges on a newly discovered pattern of emergent ${W}_3$ chiral symmetry for the Tricritical-Ising/Ising interface.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to construct a new conformal interface between the Tricritical Ising (TIM) and Ising CFTs within defect/interface CFT, structured by a newly discovered emergent W3 chiral symmetry. It employs non-invertible symmetries and modular invariance to fix the defect spectrum and couplings (including mixed boundary conditions), derives sharp predictions for observables, and discusses experimental signatures in Rydberg atom arrays.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would provide a concrete new example of an interface CFT whose operator content is controlled by emergent W3 symmetry together with consistency conditions, with direct implications for quantum simulation in Rydberg systems. The emphasis on non-invertible symmetries and modular constraints is a strength if the spectrum is shown to be uniquely determined.

major comments (2)
  1. [The section presenting the defect spectrum and W3 symmetry pattern] The central assertion that the emergent W3 algebra together with modular invariance and non-invertible symmetry rules completely determines the interface operator content and excludes additional relevant operators (dimensions <2) is load-bearing for all continuum predictions and Rydberg signatures, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit spectrum calculation, modular-invariance check, or bootstrap bound confirming that the spectrum is exhausted by the W3 modules.
  2. [The discussion of Rydberg atom array realizations] The assumption that lattice realizations introduce no extra relevant operators that would invalidate the continuum limit is stated without supporting lattice diagonalization or numerical evidence; this directly affects the reliability of the experimental predictions.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the interface defect couplings and the precise definition of the emergent W3 generators could be clarified with an explicit table or equation reference.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states the W3 pattern but does not indicate where in the text the modular-invariance verification appears.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central assertion that the emergent W3 algebra together with modular invariance and non-invertible symmetry rules completely determines the interface operator content and excludes additional relevant operators (dimensions <2) is load-bearing for all continuum predictions and Rydberg signatures, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit spectrum calculation, modular-invariance check, or bootstrap bound confirming that the spectrum is exhausted by the W3 modules.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification would strengthen the central claim. The manuscript determines the spectrum by fusing W3 modules with the non-invertible symmetry and imposing modular invariance on the interface partition function, but we will add a new subsection that lists the resulting defect operators, performs the modular S- and T-transformations explicitly on the low-lying spectrum, and argues that no additional relevant operators (h<2) are permitted by the symmetry algebra. This will be presented as a self-contained consistency check. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The assumption that lattice realizations introduce no extra relevant operators that would invalidate the continuum limit is stated without supporting lattice diagonalization or numerical evidence; this directly affects the reliability of the experimental predictions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current discussion of Rydberg realizations relies on symmetry protection without direct numerical confirmation. We will add a short paragraph (and, if space allows, a brief appendix) summarizing small-system exact-diagonalization results on the proposed Rydberg Hamiltonian that show the low-energy spectrum matches the expected W3 interface operators and contains no extraneous relevant operators below dimension 2. These checks will be presented as supporting evidence rather than a full lattice proof. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity identified; derivation relies on external consistency conditions without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The abstract and skeptic summary describe an emergent W3 symmetry used together with modular invariance and non-invertible symmetry consistency to constrain the defect spectrum and couplings. No equations, self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work are visible in the provided text. The central claim is presented as a discovery of the symmetry pattern for this specific interface, with predictions following from standard CFT consistency rules rather than any input being redefined as output. Without explicit quotes showing a reduction (e.g., spectrum fixed by definition from the symmetry that was itself extracted from the same spectrum), the derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as modular invariance checks. This is the expected honest non-finding for an abstract-level description.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Central claim rests on standard CFT axioms plus the assumption that the interface admits a consistent DCFT description organized by emergent W3 symmetry; no free parameters or new entities are quantified in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Conformal invariance and modular invariance of the interface
    Invoked to ensure consistency of the defect spectrum
  • domain assumption Existence of non-invertible symmetries at the interface
    Used to constrain the allowed defect couplings
invented entities (1)
  • Emergent W3 chiral symmetry pattern no independent evidence
    purpose: Organizes the defect spectrum and observables of the new interface
    Described as newly discovered; no independent evidence supplied in abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5651 in / 1275 out tokens · 38203 ms · 2026-05-25T03:44:56.584091+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    considered RG flows between the series of 1+1d uni- tary minimal model CFTsM m,m+1 (first studied in [18]) and showed that the coefficients of the interface state cor- rectly capture the UV-IR mapM m,m+1 → M m−1,m to leading order in the largemexpansion [19]. Using the state-operator correspondence in 2 dimensions makes it possible to study the same syste...

    work page

  2. [2]

    A new Ising/tricritical-Ising interface: From ${W}_3$ symmetry to Rydberg atoms

    who studied the Ising-TIM RG interface using a su- persymmetric lattice formalism, matching predictions for two-point functions by [9]. In this work, we revisit the Ising-TIM interface and report on the discovery of a new conformal interface. We use the O’Brien-Fendley formulation [26], which has manifest non-invertible Kramers-Wannier symmetry, to study ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    ,(5) FIG

    +. . . ,(5) FIG. 2: The phase transition on the Ising/TIM interface. The plot is symmetric with respect toh b = 0. FIG. 3: The states of Ising/TIM interface at critical coupling, which corresponds to the open-string channel spectrum of the folded theory. The small horizontal lines are the theoretical prediction, and the dots are the numerical data. The bl...

    work page

  4. [4]

    They satisfy twisted Cardy conditions described in Appendix D

    For the ‘twisted’ Ishibashi states|h;w⟩⟩ −, on the other hand, the operatorQimplements the outer au- tomorphismW −k → −W −k. They satisfy twisted Cardy conditions described in Appendix D. All in all, this gives the following ansatz for the boundary state |B⟩FM,± = √c1|1⟩⟩W3,± +s 1 r c1 2 1√ 2 |D⟩⟩W3,± +c.c. +s 2 √c2 1√ 2 |Z⟩⟩ W3,± +c.c. +s 3 √ 2c2|X⟩⟩ W3,...

    work page

  5. [5]

    J. L. Cardy, Nuclear Physics B324, 581 (1989)

    work page 1989

  6. [6]

    Kondo, Progress of Theoretical Physics32, 37 (1964), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/32/1/37/5193092/32-1-37.pdf

    J. Kondo, Progress of Theoretical Physics32, 37 (1964), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/32/1/37/5193092/32-1-37.pdf

    work page 1964

  7. [7]

    Affleck, Nuclear Physics B336, 517 (1990)

    I. Affleck, Nuclear Physics B336, 517 (1990)

    work page 1990

  8. [8]

    Affleck and A

    I. Affleck and A. W. Ludwig, Nuclear Physics B360, 641 (1991)

    work page 1991

  9. [9]

    Affleck and A

    I. Affleck and A. W. Ludwig, Nuclear Physics B352, 849 (1991)

    work page 1991

  10. [10]

    Defect Lines in the Ising Model and Boundary States on Orbifolds

    M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 2604 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9606177

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  11. [11]

    Oshikawa and I

    M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck, Nuclear Physics B495, 533 (1997)

    work page 1997

  12. [12]

    M. R. Douglas, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.462, 012011 (2013), arXiv:1005.2779 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  13. [13]

    Domain Walls for Two-Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows

    D. Gaiotto, JHEP12, 103 (2012), arXiv:1201.0767 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [14]

    Permeable conformal walls and holography

    C. Bachas, J. de Boer, R. Dijkgraaf, and H. Ooguri, JHEP06, 027 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0111210

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  15. [15]

    Symmetry Breaking Boundary States and Defect Lines

    T. Quella and V. Schomerus, JHEP06, 028 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0203161

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  16. [16]

    Defect Lines and Boundary Flows

    K. Graham and G. M. T. Watts, JHEP04, 019 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0306167

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  17. [17]

    Duality and defects in rational conformal field theory

    J. Fr¨ ohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, Nucl. Phys. B763, 354 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0607247

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  18. [18]

    Reflection and Transmission for Conformal Defects

    T. Quella, I. Runkel, and G. M. T. Watts, JHEP04, 095 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0611296

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  19. [19]

    Fusion of conformal interfaces

    C. Bachas and I. Brunner, JHEP02, 085 (2008), arXiv:0712.0076 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  20. [20]

    Defect flows in minimal models

    M. Kormos, I. Runkel, and G. M. T. Watts, JHEP11, 057 (2009), arXiv:0907.1497 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  21. [21]

    Fusion of Critical Defect Lines in the 2D Ising Model

    C. Bachas, I. Brunner, and D. Roggenkamp, J. Stat. Mech.1308, P08008 (2013), arXiv:1303.3616 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.46, 1090 (1987)

    work page 1987

  23. [23]

    See [68–73] for recent applications of this idea

    work page

  24. [24]

    Topological Defects on the Lattice I: The Ising model

    D. Aasen, R. S. K. Mong, and P. Fendley, J. Phys. A49, 354001 (2016), arXiv:1601.07185 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang, and X. Yin, JHEP01, 026 (2019), arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    Aasen, P

    D. Aasen, P. Fendley, and R. S. K. Mong, (2020), arXiv:2008.08598 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Belletˆ ete, A

    J. Belletˆ ete, A. M. Gainutdinov, J. L. Jacobsen, H. Saleur, and T. S. Tavares, (2020), arXiv:2003.11293 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Roy and H

    A. Roy and H. Saleur, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 090603 (2022), arXiv:2111.04534 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    C. V. Cogburn, A. L. Fitzpatrick, and H. Geng, SciPost Phys. Core7, 021 (2024), arXiv:2308.00737 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Lattice supersymmetry and order-disorder coexistence in the tricritical Ising model

    E. O’Brien and P. Fendley, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 206403 (2018), arXiv:1712.06662 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    X. Sun, Y. Le, S. Naus, R. B.-S. Tsai, L. R. B. Picard, S. Murciano, M. Knap, J. Alicea, and M. Endres, (2026), arXiv:2601.16275 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Keesling, A

    A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pich- ler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar, S. Schwartz, P. Silvi, S. Sachdev, P. Zoller, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Nature568, 207–211 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Scholl, M

    P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. L¨ auchli, and A. Browaeys, Nature595, 233–238 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pich- ler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Nature595, 227–232 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kali- nowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vish- wanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Sci- ence374, 1242–1247 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Fanget al., Science390, adq0278 (2025), arXiv:2402.15376 [quant-ph]

    F. Fanget al., Science390, adq0278 (2025), arXiv:2402.15376 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, Sci- Post Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, Theor. Math. Phys.65, 1205 (1985)

    work page 1985

  39. [39]

    V. A. Fateev and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Nucl. Phys. B 280, 644 (1987)

    work page 1987

  40. [40]

    Crnkovic, R

    C. Crnkovic, R. Paunov, G. M. Sotkov, and M. Stan- ishkov, Nucl. Phys. B336, 637 (1990)

    work page 1990

  41. [41]

    In this case, we have a spin-3 phantom current and the analysis of [9] predicts one phantom current of spin (1−r) 2/2 for each operator ϕIR (1,r)ϕUV (r,1)

    Holomorphic operators which appear after folding accross the interface have been refered to as ‘phantom currents’ in the recent literature [74, 75]. In this case, we have a spin-3 phantom current and the analysis of [9] predicts one phantom current of spin (1−r) 2/2 for each operator ϕIR (1,r)ϕUV (r,1)

    work page

  42. [42]

    By gaug- ing the simplest candidate dual symmetry—the diagonal Z2—one simply obtains a non-diagonal modular invari- ant of the tensor product theory

    To obtain theW 3 theory from the tensor product is a more subtle question that we will not address. By gaug- ing the simplest candidate dual symmetry—the diagonal Z2—one simply obtains a non-diagonal modular invari- ant of the tensor product theory. It would be interest- ing to understand whether a different procedure, such as gauging the diagonal non-inv...

    work page

  43. [43]

    Honecker, Nucl

    A. Honecker, Nucl. Phys. B400, 574 (1993), arXiv:hep- th/9211130

    work page arXiv 1993

  44. [44]

    Orbifold analysis of broken bulk symmetries

    J. Fuchs and C. Schweigert, Phys. Lett. B447, 266 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9811211

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  45. [45]

    Symmetry breaking boundaries I. General theory

    J. Fuchs and C. Schweigert, Nucl. Phys. B558, 419 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9902132

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  46. [46]

    A. F. Caldeira, JHEP07, 013 (2003), arXiv:hep- th/0306082

    work page arXiv 2003

  47. [47]

    J. L. Cardy, Nucl. Phys. B275, 200 (1986)

    work page 1986

  48. [48]

    J. L. Cardy, Nucl. Phys. B324, 581 (1989)

    work page 1989

  49. [49]

    D. C. Lewellen, Nucl. Phys. B372, 654 (1992)

    work page 1992

  50. [50]

    R. E. Behrend, P. A. Pearce, V. B. Petkova, and J.- B. Zuber, Nucl. Phys. B579, 707 (2000), arXiv:hep- th/9908036

    work page arXiv 2000

  51. [51]

    Realizing quantum Ising models in tunable two-dimensional arrays of single Rydberg atoms

    H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, S. Ravets, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, T. Macr` ı, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Nature534, 667 (2016), arXiv:1509.04543 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  52. [52]

    Meson spectroscopy of exotic symmetries of Ising criticality in Rydberg atom arrays

    J. Vovrosh, J. de Hond, S. Juli` a-Farr´ e, J. Knolle, and A. Dauphin, (2025), arXiv:2506.21299 [quant-ph]. 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Fendley, K

    P. Fendley, K. Sengupta, and S. Sachdev, Physical Re- view B69(2004), 10.1103/physrevb.69.075106

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.075106 2004

  54. [54]

    H. Wang, X. Li, and C. Li, Nature Commun.16, 10584 (2025), arXiv:2505.12979 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Manovitz, S

    T. Manovitz, S. H. Li, S. Ebadi, R. Samajdar, A. A. Geim, S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, H. Zhou, N. U. Koylu- oglu, J. Feldmeier, P. E. Dolgirev, N. Maskara, M. Kali- nowski, S. Sachdev, D. A. Huse, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Nature638, 86–92 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Barredo, V

    D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Nature561, 79–82 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Y. Song, M. Kim, H. Hwang, W. Lee, and J. Ahn, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013286 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    Feiguin, S

    A. Feiguin, S. Trebst, A. W. W. Ludwig, M. Troyer, A. Kitaev, Z. Wang, and M. H. Freedman, Physical Re- view Letters98(2007), 10.1103/physrevlett.98.160409

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.160409 2007

  59. [59]

    Trebst, E

    S. Trebst, E. Ardonne, A. Feiguin, D. A. Huse, A. W. W. Ludwig, and M. Troyer, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 050401 (2008)

    work page 2008

  60. [60]

    Antunes and J

    A. Antunes and J. Rong, (2025), arXiv:2507.14280 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Meineri and B

    M. Meineri and B. Radhakrishnan, JHEP04, 040 (2026), arXiv:2506.17382 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Antunes, JHEP10, 057 (2021), arXiv:2103.03132 [hep-th]

    A. Antunes, JHEP10, 057 (2021), arXiv:2103.03132 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Diatlyk, H

    O. Diatlyk, H. Khanchandani, F. K. Popov, and Y. Wang, JHEP09, 006 (2024), arXiv:2404.05815 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Shimamori, JHEP08, 131 (2024), arXiv:2404.08411 [hep-th]

    S. Shimamori, JHEP08, 131 (2024), arXiv:2404.08411 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Shachar, JHEP03, 103 (2025), [Erratum: JHEP 04, 171 (2026)], arXiv:2411.14543 [hep-th]

    T. Shachar, JHEP03, 103 (2025), [Erratum: JHEP 04, 171 (2026)], arXiv:2411.14543 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Cuomo, Y.-C

    G. Cuomo, Y.-C. He, and Z. Komargodski, JHEP11, 061 (2024), arXiv:2406.10186 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    M. J. Tejwani, O. Ferreira, and O. E. Vilches, Phys. Rev. Lett.44, 152 (1980)

    work page 1980

  68. [68]

    Wiechert, K.-D

    H. Wiechert, K.-D. Kortmann, and N. St¨ ußer, Physica B: Condensed Matter234-236, 164 (1997), proceedings of the First European Conference on Neutron Scattering

    work page 1997

  69. [69]

    Wiechert, K.-D

    H. Wiechert, K.-D. Kortmann, and N. St¨ ußer, Phys. Rev. B70, 125410 (2004)

    work page 2004

  70. [70]

    Maffi, N

    L. Maffi, N. Tausendpfund, M. Rizzi, and M. Burrello, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 226502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Emergent Space-time Supersymmetry at the Boundary of a Topological Phase

    T. Grover, D. N. Sheng, and A. Vishwanath, Science 344, 280 (2014), arXiv:1301.7449 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  72. [72]

    Behan, L

    C. Behan, L. Di Pietro, E. Lauria, and B. C. van Rees, JHEP03, 146 (2022), arXiv:2111.04747 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Antunes and C

    A. Antunes and C. Behan, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 071602 (2023), arXiv:2211.16503 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    Antunes and C

    A. Antunes and C. Behan, SciPost Phys.18, 132 (2025), arXiv:2412.21107 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Behan, D

    C. Behan, D. Benedetti, F. Eustachon, and E. Lauria, JHEP02, 001 (2026), arXiv:2509.26372 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  76. [76]

    Taxonomy of coupled minimal models from finite groups

    A. Antunes and N. Suchel, (2025), arXiv:2512.23664 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Antunes, (2026), arXiv:2602.12341 [hep-th]

    A. Antunes, (2026), arXiv:2602.12341 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  78. [78]

    Antinucci, C

    A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 211602 (2025), arXiv:2505.09668 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Furuta, Y

    Y. Furuta, Y. Kusuki, and T. Onagi, Phys. Rev. D113, 045008 (2026), arXiv:2511.00356 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  80. [80]

    Boundary Critical Phenomena in the Three-State Potts Model

    I. Affleck, M. Oshikawa, and H. Saleur, J. Phys. A31, 5827 (1998), arXiv:cond-mat/9804117

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

Showing first 80 references.