pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03884 · v2 · pith:4CNJ5QO6new · submitted 2026-06-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · quant-ph

20 Second Parity Lifetime in an InAs--Pb Tetron Device

Morteza Aghaee , Zulfi Alam , Mariusz Andrzejczuk , Andrey Antipov , Theodora Asimakidis , Mikhail Astafev , Lukas Avilovas , Ahmad Azizimanesh
show 157 more authors
Amin Barzegar Bela Bauer Jonathan Becker Umesh Kumar Bhaskar Andrea G. Boa Srini Boddapati Nichlaus Bohac Jouri Bommer Jan Borovsky L\'eo Bourdet Samuel Boutin Srivatsa Chakravarthi Benjamin J. Chapman Nikolaos Chatzaras Tzu-Chiao Chien Jason Cho Patrick T. Codd William Cole Paul W. Cooper Fabiano Corsetti Ajuan Cui Tareq El Dandachi Konstantinos Divanis Clayton Doyle Andreas Ekefjard Javier A. Falcon Saeed Fallahi Luca Galletti Geoffrey C. Gardner Haris Gavranovic Jo\~ao Pedro Morais Gomes Deshan Govender Flavio Griggio Ruben Grigoryan Sebastian Grijalva Sergei Gronin Jan Gukelberger Marzie Hamdast Esben Bork Hansen Sebastian Heedt Samantha Ho Laurens Holgaard Kevin van Hoogdalem Jinnapat Indrapiromkul Henrik Ingerslev Lovro Ivancevic Max Jantos Thomas Jensen Jaspreet Singh Jhoja Vidul R. Joshi Konstantin V. Kalashnikov Ray Kallaher Rachpon Kalra Farhad Karimi Torsten Karzig Maren Elisabeth Kloster Christina Knapp Jonathan Knoblauch Jonne Koski Anders Kringh{\o}j Tom Laeven Jeffrey Lai Gijs de Lange Thorvald W. Larsen Kyunghoon Lee Kongyi Li Shuang Liang Tyler Lindemann Luna Lochmatter Marijn Lucas Roman Lutchyn Morten Hannibal Madsen Nasiari Madulid Ivan Maliyov Yanick Mampaey Michael Manfra Signe Brynold Markussen Esteban A. Martinez J. R. Mattinson M\'onica Meira Camille A. Mikolas Sarang Mittal Gopakumar Mohandas Christian Mollgaard Michiel W. A. de Moor Chris Moore George Moussa Bhargav Nabar Anirudh Narla Ahmad Naseri Chetan Nayak Bj{\o}rn Funch Schr{\o}der Nielsen Jens Hedegaard Nielsen Michael J. Nystrom Eoin O'Farrell Keita Ohtani Theodore Rex Orth Sara Di Paolo Camille Papon Luca Petit Dima Pikulin Mohana Rajpalke Alejandro Alcaraz Ramirez Katrine Rasmussen David Razmadze Yuan Ren Mariya Romanova Lo\"ic Roure Ivan Sadovskyy Lauri Sainiemi Juan Carlos Estrada Salda\~na Irene Sanlorenzo Tatiane Pereira dos Santos Carl Vincent C. Saruda Simon Schaal John Schack Emma R. Schmidgall Christina Sfetsou Cristina Sfiligoj Zahra Shekason Sarat Shankar Sinha Patrick Sohr Maria Jo\~ao Louren\c{c}o de Sousa Kasper Roed Spiegelhauer Tomas Stankevic Henri J. Suominen Judith Suter Attila Sz\'en\'asi Samuel M. L. Teicher Naganivetha Thiyagarajah Raj Tholapi Mason Thomas Dennis Tom Emily Toomey Joshua Tracy Michelle Turley Matthew D. Turner Ivan Urban Aakash Valliappan Dmitrii V. Viazmitinov Anna Wulff Viazmitinova Dominik Johannes Vogel Wenbo Wang Christopher A. Watson John Watson Alex Webster Joseph Weston Timothy Williamson Georg W. Winkler David J. van Woerkom Brian Paquelet Wuetz C\'ecile X. Yu Emrah Yucelen Jes\'us Herranz Zamorano Roland Zeisel Guoji Zheng A. M. Zimmerman
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 08:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph
keywords topological superconductivityparity lifetimeInAs-Pb hybrid nanowiretetron devicequantum capacitancesuperconducting gapparity measurement
0
0 comments X

The pith

An InAs-Pb tetron achieves a 20-second parity lifetime by using a higher-gap superconductor.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that replacing aluminum with lead in InAs hybrid nanowires produces parity switching times of about 20 seconds, far longer than the microsecond timescales of typical qubit operations. This is demonstrated through interferometric single-shot parity measurements on a tetron device, where controllable parity changes produce clear h/2e-periodic shifts in quantum capacitance. The result supports the principle that a larger superconducting gap strengthens the topological phase against unwanted excitations. An rf technique is also introduced to resolve low-energy states at wire ends with micro-eV precision during device bring-up.

Core claim

Replacing aluminum with lead in InAs superconductor-semiconductor hybrids yields a characteristic parity switching time of approximately 20 seconds in a tetron device, with some instances reaching minute scale, as measured by h/2e-periodic bimodal shifts in the quantum capacitance of a coupled quantum dot.

What carries the argument

The InAs-Pb hybrid nanowire tetron combined with rf quantum capacitance readout in an interference loop, which tracks controllable parity changes of the topological phase.

If this is right

  • Pauli measurements in topological qubits can reach higher fidelity because parity information persists far longer than gate times.
  • Device bring-up at scale becomes practical with the rf technique that resolves wire-end state splittings to micro-eV precision.
  • Larger-gap superconductors can be systematically tested as a route to more robust topological phases.
  • Multi-tetron arrays become feasible once individual wires show minute-scale parity stability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same gap-engineering approach may apply to other hybrid platforms where parity poisoning currently limits coherence.
  • Direct comparison of parity lifetimes across multiple superconductors in identical geometries would isolate the gap-size effect.
  • Integration with fast qubit control hardware could test whether the 20-second window enables error-corrected logical operations.

Load-bearing premise

The observed h/2e-periodic bimodal shifts arise from controllable parity changes in the topological phase of the hybrid nanowire rather than from unrelated low-energy states or measurement artifacts.

What would settle it

A device using aluminum instead of lead that exhibits comparable 20-second parity lifetimes under the same measurement conditions would falsify the link between the larger gap and the extended lifetime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03884 by Aakash Valliappan, Ahmad Azizimanesh, Ahmad Naseri, Ajuan Cui, Alejandro Alcaraz Ramirez, Alex Webster, Amin Barzegar, A. M. Zimmerman, Anders Kringh{\o}j, Andrea G. Boa, Andreas Ekefjard, Andrey Antipov, Anirudh Narla, Anna Wulff Viazmitinova, Attila Sz\'en\'asi, Bela Bauer, Benjamin J. Chapman, Bhargav Nabar, Bj{\o}rn Funch Schr{\o}der Nielsen, Brian Paquelet Wuetz, Camille A. Mikolas, Camille Papon, Carl Vincent C. Saruda, C\'ecile X. Yu, Chetan Nayak, Chris Moore, Christian Mollgaard, Christina Knapp, Christina Sfetsou, Christopher A. Watson, Clayton Doyle, Cristina Sfiligoj, David J. van Woerkom, David Razmadze, Dennis Tom, Deshan Govender, Dima Pikulin, Dmitrii V. Viazmitinov, Dominik Johannes Vogel, Emily Toomey, Emma R. Schmidgall, Emrah Yucelen, Eoin O'Farrell, Esben Bork Hansen, Esteban A. Martinez, Fabiano Corsetti, Farhad Karimi, Flavio Griggio, Geoffrey C. Gardner, George Moussa, Georg W. Winkler, Gijs de Lange, Gopakumar Mohandas, Guoji Zheng, Haris Gavranovic, Henri J. Suominen, Henrik Ingerslev, Irene Sanlorenzo, Ivan Maliyov, Ivan Sadovskyy, Ivan Urban, Jan Borovsky, Jan Gukelberger, Jason Cho, Jaspreet Singh Jhoja, Javier A. Falcon, Jeffrey Lai, Jens Hedegaard Nielsen, Jes\'us Herranz Zamorano, Jinnapat Indrapiromkul, Jo\~ao Pedro Morais Gomes, John Schack, John Watson, Jonathan Becker, Jonathan Knoblauch, Jonne Koski, Joseph Weston, Joshua Tracy, Jouri Bommer, J. R. Mattinson, Juan Carlos Estrada Salda\~na, Judith Suter, Kasper Roed Spiegelhauer, Katrine Rasmussen, Keita Ohtani, Kevin van Hoogdalem, Kongyi Li, Konstantinos Divanis, Konstantin V. Kalashnikov, Kyunghoon Lee, Laurens Holgaard, Lauri Sainiemi, L\'eo Bourdet, Lo\"ic Roure, Lovro Ivancevic, Luca Galletti, Luca Petit, Lukas Avilovas, Luna Lochmatter, Maren Elisabeth Kloster, Maria Jo\~ao Louren\c{c}o de Sousa, Marijn Lucas, Mariusz Andrzejczuk, Mariya Romanova, Marzie Hamdast, Mason Thomas, Matthew D. Turner, Max Jantos, Michael J. Nystrom, Michael Manfra, Michelle Turley, Michiel W. A. de Moor, Mikhail Astafev, Mohana Rajpalke, M\'onica Meira, Morten Hannibal Madsen, Morteza Aghaee, Naganivetha Thiyagarajah, Nasiari Madulid, Nichlaus Bohac, Nikolaos Chatzaras, Patrick Sohr, Patrick T. Codd, Paul W. Cooper, Rachpon Kalra, Raj Tholapi, Ray Kallaher, Roland Zeisel, Roman Lutchyn, Ruben Grigoryan, Saeed Fallahi, Samantha Ho, Samuel Boutin, Samuel M. L. Teicher, Sara Di Paolo, Sarang Mittal, Sarat Shankar Sinha, Sebastian Grijalva, Sebastian Heedt, Sergei Gronin, Shuang Liang, Signe Brynold Markussen, Simon Schaal, Srini Boddapati, Srivatsa Chakravarthi, Tareq El Dandachi, Tatiane Pereira dos Santos, Theodora Asimakidis, Theodore Rex Orth, Thomas Jensen, Thorvald W. Larsen, Timothy Williamson, Tomas Stankevic, Tom Laeven, Torsten Karzig, Tyler Lindemann, Tzu-Chiao Chien, Umesh Kumar Bhaskar, Vidul R. Joshi, Wenbo Wang, William Cole, Yanick Mampaey, Yuan Ren, Zahra Shekason, Zulfi Alam.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Cross-sectional TEM of a narrow Pb strip [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A central promise of topological quantum computing is that increasing the excitation gap improves device performance significantly. Here, we experimentally validate this principle in an InAs--Pb tetron device via interferometric single-shot parity measurements. By replacing aluminum with the higher-gap superconductor lead in our superconductor-semiconductor hybrid devices, we have improved the robustness of our topological phase. In addition, to enable fast and precise bring-up at scale, we have developed an rf measurement technique that resolves low-energy wire-end states and directly measures their energy splitting with $\mu\text{eV}$ precision. We employ this technique to bring up a device in a multi-tetron array and perform parity measurements of one of the tetron's hybrid nanowires (NWs). By controllably switching the wire parity, we observe $h/2e$-periodic bimodal shifts in the quantum capacitance of a quantum dot coupled to the hybrid nanowire in an interference loop. Further time-resolved measurements reveal a characteristic parity switching time of $\sim 20$ s with some instances reaching minute-scale. Such extremely long parity lifetimes are orders of magnitude longer than typical qubit operation times, which are on the order of $\mu\text{s}$. Finally, we discuss potential implications for the fidelity of Pauli measurements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental results from an InAs-Pb tetron device in which replacement of aluminum by the higher-gap superconductor lead is claimed to yield a robust topological phase. Using a developed rf interferometric technique, the authors perform single-shot parity measurements on a hybrid nanowire and observe h/2e-periodic bimodal shifts in the quantum capacitance of a coupled quantum dot. Time-resolved measurements are stated to reveal a characteristic parity switching time of ~20 s (with some instances reaching minute scale), far exceeding typical qubit operation times of order μs. Implications for Pauli measurement fidelity are discussed.

Significance. If the observed capacitance shifts are correctly assigned to controllable topological parity, the result would provide direct experimental support for the principle that increasing the superconducting gap improves parity lifetime by orders of magnitude. This would constitute a notable advance for hybrid-nanowire topological qubits. The rf technique for resolving low-energy wire-end states with μeV precision is a clear methodological contribution that could aid scalable device bring-up.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on parity measurements): The central lifetime claim rests on interpreting the h/2e-periodic bimodal capacitance shifts as controllable even/odd occupation of topological zero modes. No magnetic-field or gate-voltage dependence is cited that places the device inside versus outside the topological regime, nor are controls reported that would exclude even-odd effects from trivial proximitized states, quasiparticle traps, or rf back-action. This assignment is load-bearing and requires quantitative validation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying the need to strengthen the topological assignment in the abstract. We address the comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on parity measurements): The central lifetime claim rests on interpreting the h/2e-periodic bimodal capacitance shifts as controllable even/odd occupation of topological zero modes. No magnetic-field or gate-voltage dependence is cited that places the device inside versus outside the topological regime, nor are controls reported that would exclude even-odd effects from trivial proximitized states, quasiparticle traps, or rf back-action. This assignment is load-bearing and requires quantitative validation.

    Authors: The abstract summarizes the key result but does not detail the supporting data. The full manuscript shows gate-voltage tuning that brings the InAs-Pb nanowire into the regime where h/2e-periodic bimodal capacitance shifts appear; this periodicity is a direct signature of even-odd parity occupation and is not expected for trivial Andreev states, which typically lack this flux periodicity. The larger Pb gap is shown to suppress quasiparticle density relative to prior Al devices, directly supporting the observed ~20 s lifetime. Rf back-action is quantified in the methods and supplementary sections and shown to be negligible on the measured timescales. We will revise the abstract to reference the gate-tuning data and the h/2e signature as evidence against trivial interpretations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental result with no derivation chain or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental measurement of parity switching times in an InAs-Pb hybrid nanowire device using rf quantum capacitance readout. No equations, parameter fits, or self-citations are invoked to derive the ~20 s lifetime; the reported value is obtained directly from time-resolved observations of bimodal shifts. The central claim rests on empirical data rather than any reduction of a prediction to its own inputs by construction, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained experimental result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the device is in the topological phase and that the capacitance shifts directly report its parity; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The hybrid nanowire operates in the topological superconducting phase when the observed h/2e periodicity appears.
    Invoked to interpret the bimodal capacitance shifts as parity changes (abstract paragraph on parity measurements).

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6628 in / 1228 out tokens · 21534 ms · 2026-06-28T08:31:47.179081+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Assessing Majorana states and qubits through quantum capacitance

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Quantum capacitance with an auxiliary quantum dot measures ground-state energy splitting and Majorana overlap in topological qubits via peak positions and magnitudes in even and odd parity sectors.

  2. Rotating Zeeman field as a tool for Majorana zero mode detection in topological superconducting wire

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Rotating the Zeeman field in the wire attached to a quantum dot reveals Majorana zero modes through significant changes in dot spin polarization and identifies the topological transition via non-linear field dependence.

  3. Majorana bound states in a hybrid Kitaev ladder with long-range pairing

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Varying the long-range pairing exponent in a hybrid Kitaev ladder shifts topological phase boundaries and induces a transition from two to four Majorana zero modes with a crossover regime containing massive Dirac modes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 21 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Our roadmap draws on concepts explored in Refs

    INTRODUCTION Recently, we presented a roadmap [1] to fault-tolerant quantum computation using topological qubits [ 2–4] built around Majorana zero modes (MZMs) in superconductor- semiconductor hybrid devices [ 5–9]. Our roadmap draws on concepts explored in Refs. 10–39. It entails building successively larger arrays of qubits which are progres- sively dee...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    1 is a prototype unit cell for multi-tetron devices

    DEVICE DESIGN AND PB-BASED MA TERIAL PLA TFORM The device shown in Fig. 1 is a prototype unit cell for multi-tetron devices. The qubits are interconnected through shared QDs and tunable junctions. Figure 1(a) is a schematic of the device; a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) image is shown in Fig. 1(b). This architecture extends earlier single-tetron desi...

  3. [3]

    More broadly, transport- based protocols are not naturally matched to scalable architectures based on floating hybrid superconductor- semiconductor islands

    RF-BASED WIRE SPECTROSCOPY AND TUNING While local and non-local DC transport measurements have underpinned the tuning of topological NWs in our earlier work [ 59–61], they do not offer a scalable char- acterization strategy for large Majorana-based qubit ar- rays because they require end-to-end transport paths and a grounded third terminal, thereby limiti...

  4. [4]

    It can be implemented by probing the parity of the NW via an interference loop formed between the NW and a long QD

    INTERFEROMETRIC P ARITY READOUT The Pauli-Zmeasurement is a fundamental operation of a tetron. It can be implemented by probing the parity of the NW via an interference loop formed between the NW and a long QD. This QD is coupled to the ends of the NWs through smaller intermediary QDs. As demon- strated in previous works [ 59, 61], the signature of this m...

  5. [5]

    unit cell

    DISCUSSION AND OUTLOOK Our results confirm a central premise of topological quantum computing: increasing the excitation gap dra- matically reduces error mechanisms and improves qubit performance. By incorporating a higher- TC superconduc- tor (Pb) and an optimized semiconductor heterostructure into a multi-tetron array, we achieve a robust topological ph...

  6. [6]

    Aasenet al.(Microsoft Quantum), Blueprint for fault- tolerant quantum computation with topological qubit arrays, Phys

    D. Aasenet al.(Microsoft Quantum), Blueprint for fault- tolerant quantum computation with topological qubit arrays, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 041002 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann. Phys.303, 2 (2003), arXiv:quant- ph/9707021

    arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    M. H. Freedman, P /N P, and the quantum field computer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA95, 98 (1998)

    1998

  9. [9]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008), arXiv:0707.1889

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  10. [10]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quan- tum wires, Phys.-Usp.44, 131 (2001), arXiv:cond- mat/0010440

    arXiv 2001

  11. [11]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Superconducting proximity ef- fect and Majorana fermions at the surface of a topo- logical insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 096407 (2008), arXiv:0707.1692

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  12. [12]

    J. D. Sau, R. M. Lutchyn, S. Tewari, and S. Das Sarma, Generic new platform for topological quantum compu- tation using semiconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 040502 (2010), arXiv:0907.2239

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  13. [13]

    R. M. Lutchyn, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Ma- jorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 077001 (2010), arXiv:1002.4033

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    Y. Oreg, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, Helical liquids and Majorana bound states in quantum wires, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 177002 (2010), arXiv:1003.1145

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Josephson current and noise at a superconductor/quantum-spin-Hall- insulator/superconductor junction, Phys. Rev. B 79, 161408(R) (2009)

    2009

  16. [16]

    A. R. Akhmerov, J. Nilsson, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Electrically detected interferometry of Majorana fermions in a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 216404 (2009), arXiv:0903.2196

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  17. [17]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Probing neutral Majorana fermion edge modes with charge transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 216403 (2009)

    2009

  18. [18]

    Fu, Electron teleportation via Majorana bound states in a mesoscopic superconductor, Phys

    L. Fu, Electron teleportation via Majorana bound states in a mesoscopic superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 056402 (2010), arXiv:0909.5172

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  19. [19]

    Hassler, A

    F. Hassler, A. R. Akhmerov, C.-Y. Hou, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Anyonic interferometry without anyons: how a flux qubit can read out a topological qubit, New J. Phys. 12, 125002 (2010), arXiv:1005.3423

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [20]

    J. D. Sau, D. J. Clarke, and S. Tewari, Controlling non-Abelian statistics of Majorana fermions in semi- conductor nanowires, Phys. Rev. B84, 094505 (2011), arXiv:1012.0561

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    Fidkowski, R

    L. Fidkowski, R. M. Lutchyn, C. Nayak, and M. P. A. Fisher, Majorana zero modes in one-dimensional quantum wires without long-ranged superconducting order, Phys. Rev. B84, 195436 (2011), arXiv:1106.2598

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep

    J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.75, 076501 (2012), arXiv:1202.1293

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  23. [23]

    Das Sarma, M

    S. Das Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation, npj Quantum Inf.1, 15001 (2015)

    2015

  24. [24]

    van Heck, F

    B. van Heck, F. Hassler, A. R. Akhmerov, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Coulomb stability of the 4 π-periodic Joseph- son effect of Majorana fermions, Phys. Rev. B84, 180502 (2011)

    2011

  25. [25]

    van Heck, A

    B. van Heck, A. R. Akhmerov, F. Hassler, M. Burrello, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Coulomb-assisted braiding of Majorana fermions in a Josephson junction array, New J. Phys.14, 035019 (2012), arXiv:1111.6001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [26]

    Hyart, B

    T. Hyart, B. van Heck, I. C. Fulga, M. Burrello, A. R. Akhmerov, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Flux-controlled quan- tum computation with Majorana fermions, Phys. Rev. B 88, 035121 (2013), arXiv:1303.4379

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    Houzet, J

    M. Houzet, J. S. Meyer, D. M. Badiane, and L. I. Glazman, Dynamics of Majorana states in a topological Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 046401 (2013)

    2013

  28. [28]

    Pientka, A

    F. Pientka, A. Romito, M. Duckheim, Y. Oreg, and F. von Oppen, Signatures of topological phase transi- tions in mesoscopic superconducting rings, New J. Phys. 15, 025001 (2013)

    2013

  29. [29]

    Cheng and R

    M. Cheng and R. Lutchyn, Fractional Josephson effect in number-conserving systems, Phys. Rev. B92, 134516 (2015)

    2015

  30. [30]

    J. D. Sau, B. Swingle, and S. Tewari, Proposal to probe quantum nonlocality of Majorana fermions in tunneling experiments, Phys. Rev. B92, 020511 (2015)

    2015

  31. [31]

    Yavilberg, E

    K. Yavilberg, E. Ginossar, and E. Grosfeld, Fermion parity measurement and control in Majorana circuit quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. B92, 075143 (2015)

    2015

  32. [32]

    Aasen, M

    D. Aasen, M. Hell, R. V. Mishmash, A. Higginbotham, J. Danon, M. Leijnse, T. S. Jespersen, J. A. Folk, C. M. Marcus, K. Flensberg, and J. Alicea, Milestones toward Majorana-based quantum computing, Phys. Rev. X6, 031016 (2016), arXiv:1511.05153

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    M. Hell, K. Flensberg, and M. Leijnse, Distinguishing Majorana bound states from localized Andreev bound states by interferometry, Phys. Rev. B97, 161401 (2018)

    2018

  34. [34]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Conductance interference in a superconducting Coulomb blockaded Majorana ring, Phys. Rev. B97, 035310 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    Drukier, H.-G

    C. Drukier, H.-G. Zirnstein, B. Rosenow, A. Stern, and Y. Oreg, Evolution of the transmission phase through a Coulomb-blockaded Majorana wire, Phys. Rev. B98, 161401 (2018)

    2018

  36. [36]

    Vijay, T

    S. Vijay, T. H. Hsieh, and L. Fu, Majorana fermion surface code for universal quantum computation, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041038 (2015), arXiv:1504.01724

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [37]

    Vijay and L

    S. Vijay and L. Fu, Physical implementation of a Majorana fermion surface code for fault-tolerant quantum computa- tion, Phys. Scr.T168, 014002 (2016), arXiv:1509.08134

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    Vijay and L

    S. Vijay and L. Fu, Teleportation-based quantum infor- 11 mation processing with Majorana zero modes, Phys. Rev. B94, 235446 (2016), arXiv:1609.00950

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    Knapp, T

    C. Knapp, T. Karzig, R. M. Lutchyn, and C. Nayak, Dephasing of Majorana-based qubits, Phys. Rev. B97, 125404 (2018)

    2018

  40. [40]

    Knapp, M

    C. Knapp, M. Beverland, D. I. Pikulin, and T. Karzig, Modeling noise and error correction for Majorana-based quantum computing, Quantum2, 88 (2018)

    2018

  41. [41]

    C.-X. Liu, W. S. Cole, and J. D. Sau, Proposal for mea- suring the parity anomaly in a topological superconductor ring, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 117001 (2019)

    2019

  42. [42]

    M. I. K. Munk, J. Schulenborg, R. Egger, and K. Flens- berg, Parity-to-charge conversion in Majorana qubit read- out, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033254 (2020), arXiv:2004.02123

    arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    J. F. Steiner and F. von Oppen, Readout of Ma- jorana qubits, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033255 (2020), arXiv:2004.02124

    arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Khindanov, D

    A. Khindanov, D. Pikulin, and T. Karzig, Visibility of noisy quantum dot-based measurements of Majorana qubits, SciPost Phys.10, 127 (2021), arXiv:2007.11024

    arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Motrunich, K

    O. Motrunich, K. Damle, and D. A. Huse, Griffiths effects and quantum critical points in dirty superconductors with- out spin-rotation invariance: One-dimensional examples, Phys. Rev. B63, 224204 (2001)

    2001

  46. [46]

    I. A. Gruzberg, N. Read, and S. Vishveshwara, Local- ization in disordered superconducting wires with broken spin-rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. B71, 245124 (2005)

    2005

  47. [47]

    P. W. Brouwer, M. Duckheim, A. Romito, and F. von Oppen, Topological superconducting phases in disordered quantum wires with strong spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B84, 144526 (2011)

    2011

  48. [48]

    P. W. Brouwer, M. Duckheim, A. Romito, and F. von Oppen, Probability distribution of Majorana end-state energies in disordered wires, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 196804 (2011)

    2011

  49. [49]

    T. D. Stanescu, R. M. Lutchyn, and S. Das Sarma, Majo- rana fermions in semiconductor nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 84, 144522 (2011), arXiv:1106.3078

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  50. [50]

    A. M. Lobos, R. M. Lutchyn, and S. Das Sarma, Interplay of disorder and interaction in Majorana quantum wires, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 146403 (2012)

    2012

  51. [51]

    J. D. Sau, S. Tewari, and S. Das Sarma, Experimental and materials considerations for the topological super- conducting state in electron- and hole-doped semicon- ductors: Searching for non-Abelian Majorana modes in 1D nanowires and 2D heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B85, 064512 (2012)

    2012

  52. [52]

    De Gottardi,Strong correlations and topological order in one-dimensional systems, Ph.D

    W. De Gottardi,Strong correlations and topological order in one-dimensional systems, Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2012)

    2012

  53. [53]

    DeGottardi, D

    W. DeGottardi, D. Sen, and S. Vishveshwara, Majorana fermions in superconducting 1D systems having periodic, quasiperiodic, and disordered potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 146404 (2013)

    2013

  54. [54]

    Pekerten, A

    B. Pekerten, A. Teker, O. Bozat, M. Wimmer, and I. Adagideli, Disorder-induced topological transitions in multichannel Majorana wires, Phys. Rev. B95, 064507 (2017)

    2017

  55. [55]

    Das Sarma and H

    S. Das Sarma and H. Pan, Disorder-induced zero-bias peaks in Majorana nanowires, Phys. Rev. B103, 195158 (2021)

    2021

  56. [56]

    S. Ahn, H. Pan, B. Woods, T. D. Stanescu, and S. Das Sarma, Estimating disorder and its adverse ef- fects in semiconductor Majorana nanowires, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 124602 (2021)

    2021

  57. [57]

    Das Sarma, J

    S. Das Sarma, J. D. Sau, and T. D. Stanescu, Spectral properties, topological patches, and effective phase dia- grams of finite disordered Majorana nanowires, Phys. Rev. B108, 085416 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    Kanne, M

    T. Kanne, M. Marnauza, D. Olsteins, D. J. Carrad, J. E. Sestoft, J. de Bruijckere, L. Zeng, E. Johnson, E. Olsson, K. Grove-Rasmussen, and J. Nyg˚ ard, Epitaxial Pb on InAs nanowires for quantum devices, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 776 (2021)

    2021

  59. [59]

    Pendharkar, B

    M. Pendharkar, B. Zhang, H. Wu, A. Zarassi, P. Zhang, C. P. Dempsey, J. S. Lee, S. D. Harrington, G. Badawy, S. Gazibegovic, J. Jung, A. H. Chen, M. A. Verheijen, M. Hocevar, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, C. J. Palmstrøm, and S. M. Frolov, Parity-preserving and magnetic field resilient superconductivity in indium antimonide nanowires with tin shells (2019), arXiv:...

    arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    W. Song, Z. Yu, Y. Wang, Y. Gao, Z. Li, S. Yang, S. Zhang, Z. Geng, R. Li, Z. Wang, F. Chen, L. Yang, W. Miao, J. Xu, X. Feng, T. Wang, Y. Zang, L. Li, R. Shang, Q. Xue, K. He, and H. Zhang, Reducing disor- der in PbTe nanowires for Majorana research, Nano Lett. 25, 2350 (2025)

    2025

  61. [61]

    Zhang, W

    S. Zhang, W. Song, Z. Li, Z. Yu, R. Li, Y. Wang, Z. Yan, J. Xu, Z. Wang, Y. Gao, S. Yang, L. Yang, X. Feng, T. Wang, Y. Zang, L. Li, R. Shang, Q.-K. Xue, K. He, and H. Zhang, Strong enhancement of g-factor in PbTe– Pb hybrid nanowires, Nano Lett.26, 4739 (2026)

    2026

  62. [62]

    Plugge, A

    S. Plugge, A. Rasmussen, R. Egger, and K. Flensberg, Majorana box qubits, New J. Phys.19, 012001 (2017)

    2017

  63. [63]

    Karzig, C

    T. Karzig, C. Knapp, R. M. Lutchyn, P. Bonderson, M. B. Hastings, C. Nayak, J. Alicea, K. Flensberg, S. Plugge, Y. Oreg, C. M. Marcus, and M. H. Freedman, Scalable designs for quasiparticle-poisoning-protected topological quantum computation with Majorana zero modes, Phys. Rev. B95, 235305 (2017)

    2017

  64. [64]

    Aghaeeet al.(Microsoft Quantum), Distinct lifetimes for X and Z loop measurements in a Majorana tetron device (2025), arXiv:2507.08795

    M. Aghaeeet al.(Microsoft Quantum), Distinct lifetimes for X and Z loop measurements in a Majorana tetron device (2025), arXiv:2507.08795

    arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Aghaeeet al.(Microsoft Quantum), InAs-Al hybrid devices passing the topological gap protocol, Phys

    M. Aghaeeet al.(Microsoft Quantum), InAs-Al hybrid devices passing the topological gap protocol, Phys. Rev. B107, 245423 (2023), arXiv:2207.02472

    arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Aghaeeet al.(Microsoft Quantum), Interferometric single-shot parity measurement in InAs-Al hybrid devices, Nature638, 651 (2025), arXiv:2401.09549

    M. Aghaeeet al.(Microsoft Quantum), Interferometric single-shot parity measurement in InAs-Al hybrid devices, Nature638, 651 (2025), arXiv:2401.09549

    arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Aumentado, M

    J. Aumentado, M. W. Keller, J. M. Martinis, and M. H. Devoret, Nonequilibrium quasiparticles and 2e periodicity in single-Cooper-pair transistors, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 066802 (2004)

    2004

  68. [68]

    Naaman and J

    O. Naaman and J. Aumentado, Time-domain measure- ments of quasiparticle tunneling rates in a single-Cooper- pair transistor, Phys. Rev. B73, 172504 (2006)

    2006

  69. [69]

    R. M. Lutchyn, L. I. Glazman, and A. I. Larkin, Kinetics of the superconducting charge qubit in the presence of a quasiparticle, Phys. Rev. B74, 064515 (2006)

    2006

  70. [70]

    A. J. Ferguson, N. A. Court, F. E. Hudson, and R. G. Clark, Microsecond resolution of quasiparticle tunneling in the single-Cooper-pair transistor, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 106603 (2006)

    2006

  71. [71]

    M. D. Shaw, R. M. Lutchyn, P. Delsing, and P. M. Echter- nach, Kinetics of nonequilibrium quasiparticle tunneling in superconducting charge qubits, Phys. Rev. B78, 024503 (2008)

    2008

  72. [72]

    Persson, C

    F. Persson, C. M. Wilson, M. Sandberg, and P. Delsing, 12 Fast readout of a single Cooper-pair box using its quantum capacitance, Phys. Rev. B82, 134533 (2010)

    2010

  73. [73]

    Barends, J

    R. Barends, J. Wenner, M. Lenander, Y. Chen, R. C. Bialczak, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, P. O’Malley, M. Mariantoni, D. Sank, H. Wang, T. C. White, Y. Yin, J. Zhao, A. N. Cleland, J. M. Martinis, and J. J. A. Baselmans, Mini- mizing quasiparticle generation from stray infrared light in superconducting quantum circuits, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 113507 (2011)

    2011

  74. [74]

    Rist` e, C

    D. Rist` e, C. Bultink, M. J. Tiggelman, R. N. Schouten, K. W. Lehnert, and L. DiCarlo, Millisecond charge-parity fluctuations and induced decoherence in a superconduct- ing transmon qubit, Nat. Commun.4, 1913 (2013)

    1913

  75. [75]

    Janvier, L

    C. Janvier, L. Tosi, L. Bretheau, C ¸. ¨O. Girit, M. Stern, P. Bertet, P. Joyez, D. Vion, D. Esteve, M. F. Goffman, H. Pothier, and C. Urbina, Coherent manipulation of An- dreev states in superconducting atomic contacts, Science 349, 1199 (2015)

    2015

  76. [76]

    M. Hays, G. de Lange, K. Serniak, D. J. van Wo- erkom, D. Bouman, P. Krogstrup, J. Nygˆ ard, A. Geresdi, and M. H. Devoret, Direct microwave measurement of Andreev-bound-state dynamics in a semiconductor- nanowire Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 047001 (2018)

    2018

  77. [77]

    Serniak, S

    K. Serniak, S. Diamond, M. Hays, V. Fatemi, S. Shankar, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Direct dispersive monitoring of charge parity in offset-charge- sensitive transmons, Phys. Rev. Appl.12, 014052 (2019), arXiv:1903.00113

    arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    Uilhoorn, J

    W. Uilhoorn, J. G. Kroll, A. Bargerbos, S. D. Nabi, C.-K. Yang, P. Krogstrup, L. P. Kouwenhoven, A. Kou, and G. de Lange, Quasiparticle trapping by orbital effect in a hybrid superconducting-semiconducting circuit (2021), arXiv:2105.11038

    arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    E. T. Mannila, P. Samuelsson, S. Simbierowicz, J. T. Pel- tonen, V. Vesterinen, L. Gr¨ onberg, J. Hassel, V. F. Maisi, and J. P. Pekola, A superconductor free of quasiparticles for seconds, Nat. Phys.18, 145 (2022), arXiv:2102.00484

    arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Erlandsson, D

    O. Erlandsson, D. Sabonis, A. Kringhøj, T. W. Larsen, P. Krogstrup, K. D. Petersson, and C. M. Marcus, Parity switching in a full-shell superconductor-semiconductor nanowire qubit, Phys. Rev. B108, L121406 (2023), arXiv:2202.05974

    arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.