Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 1 cited by

ATLAS measures charged-particle density and mean transverse momentum versus pseudorapidity in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions at 5.36 TeV.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-26 14:48 UTC pith:AKJ7WF2I

load-bearing objection ATLAS has released the first charged-particle measurements in O+O and Ne+Ne at 5.36 TeV using their standard heavy-ion chain.

arxiv 2606.20257 v1 pith:AKJ7WF2I submitted 2026-06-18 nucl-ex hep-ex

Measurements of charged-particle pseudorapidity and transverse momentum distributions in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions at sqrt{s_(_NN)} = 5.36 TeV with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration This is my paper
classification nucl-ex hep-ex
keywords charged-particle multiplicitypseudorapidity distributionstransverse momentum spectraheavy-ion collisionsO+O collisionsNe+Ne collisionscentrality dependenceATLAS experiment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the first measurements of charged-particle production in oxygen-oxygen and neon-neon collisions at the LHC. It gives the per-event pseudorapidity density dn/dη and average transverse momentum as functions of pseudorapidity, broken down into narrow centrality intervals from 0 to 80 percent. The results are obtained inside the inner detector acceptance and then extrapolated to full pT coverage down to zero, with direct comparison to hydrodynamic model calculations.

Core claim

The per-event charged-particle pseudorapidity density dn/dη and mean transverse momentum ⟨pT⟩ are measured over |η|<2.5 and 0.27 < pT < 5 GeV as a function of η in 5%-wide centrality intervals for 5-80% centrality and 1%-wide intervals for 0-5% centrality, with invariant yields fitted to extrapolate to 0 < pT < 5 GeV; the same quantities are also extracted versus rapidity assuming a pion mass, and all results are compared to hydrodynamic calculations.

What carries the argument

Centrality determination from total transverse energy in the forward calorimeters, combined with charged-particle reconstruction in the inner detector over the stated fiducial ranges.

Load-bearing premise

The total transverse energy deposited in the forward calorimeters correctly orders events by the number of participating nucleons.

What would settle it

A systematic discrepancy between the measured dn/dη shapes and hydrodynamic predictions that grows with decreasing system size or increasing centrality would indicate that the hydrodynamic description fails for these light systems.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The measured distributions supply reference data for testing whether hydrodynamic flow develops in small nuclear systems.
  • Direct O+O versus Ne+Ne comparison isolates the effect of nuclear size at fixed collision energy.
  • The rapidity distributions allow assessment of the difference between pseudorapidity and rapidity observables.
  • Extrapolated full-pT yields enable consistent comparison with lower-energy fixed-target experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the hydrodynamic models match the light-ion data, the results would support the idea that collective behavior appears even in collisions involving only a few dozen nucleons.
  • Discrepancies in the most peripheral bins could point to the onset of non-hydrodynamic mechanisms such as string fragmentation or initial-state fluctuations.
  • These measurements could be repeated at higher LHC energies to map the energy dependence of small-system collectivity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports measurements of charged-particle pseudorapidity density dn/dη and mean transverse momentum ⟨pT⟩ in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions at √s_NN = 5.36 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Centrality is determined from total transverse energy in the forward calorimeters. Kinematics are reconstructed in the inner detector over |η| < 2.5 and 0.27 < pT < 5 GeV. Results are given in 5%-wide centrality intervals (5-80%) and 1%-wide intervals (0-5%), with pT spectra fitted to extrapolate dn/dη and ⟨pT⟩ to 0 < pT < 5 GeV. Additional measurements use rapidity (pion mass hypothesis), and results are compared to hydrodynamic calculations. Data sets are 27.7 μb^{-1} (O+O) and 53.1 μb^{-1} (Ne+Ne).

Significance. If the results hold, they supply new data on charged-particle production in small collision systems at LHC energies. These measurements test hydrodynamic models in lighter nuclei and help constrain initial-state effects and collective behavior in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions. The use of standard, well-documented ATLAS reconstruction and centrality procedures, together with explicit fiducial and extrapolated results, strengthens the utility of the data set for model comparisons.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that invariant yields are fitted to extrapolate to 0 < pT < 5 GeV, but the functional form of the fit (e.g., exponential, power-law, or blast-wave) and the fit range are not specified; this detail should be added in §4 or §5 for reproducibility.
  2. The comparison to hydrodynamic calculations is mentioned without naming the specific models, their parameters, or the centrality determination method used in the theory; a table or explicit reference list in the results section would improve clarity.
  3. The integrated luminosities are given, but the paper should state the number of events or the centrality-dependent event counts after all selections to allow assessment of statistical precision in the most central bins.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, including the significance of the measurements for testing hydrodynamic models in small systems, and for recommending minor revision. The report does not list any specific major comments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Pure measurement paper; no derivations or predictions

full rationale

This is an experimental measurement paper reporting dn/dη and ⟨pT⟩ distributions from ATLAS data in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions. Centrality uses FCal transverse energy, tracking uses the inner detector over the stated fiducial ranges, and a pT-spectrum fit is applied only to extrapolate the already-measured yields to 0 < pT < 5 GeV. No first-principles derivation, uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or self-citation chain is invoked to obtain the reported results; the outputs are direct measurements plus a standard extrapolation step. No load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Measurement paper; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities introduced beyond standard detector response and centrality definitions assumed from prior ATLAS work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5873 in / 1023 out tokens · 39448 ms · 2026-06-26T14:48:13.015408+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Measurements of charged-particle transverse momentum spectra, multiplicity, and mean transverse momentum are presented as a function of pseudorapidity and collision centrality in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}}= 5.36$ TeV using 27.7 $\mu\text{b}^{-1}$ and 53.1 $\mu\text{b}^{-1}$ data sets recorded by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The collision centrality is characterized by the total transverse energy measured in the ATLAS forward calorimeters. The kinematics of charged particles are reconstructed with the inner detector over the fiducial pseudorapidity and transverse momentum ranges $|\eta|<2.5$ and $0.27 < p_{\text{T}} < 5$ GeV using data from the ATLAS inner detector. The per-event charged-particle pseudorapidity density $dn/d\eta$ and mean transverse momentum $\langle p_{\text{T}}\rangle$ are measured over this fiducial range as a function of $\eta$. The results are reported in 5%-wide centrality intervals covering the 5-80% centrality range, and in 1%-wide intervals covering the 0-5% centrality range. Invariant per-event yields are evaluated as a function of $\eta$ and $p_{\text{T}}$. Their $p_{\text{T}}$ dependence is fitted to estimate extrapolated $dn/d\eta$ and $\langle p_{\text{T}}\rangle$ values over $0 < p_{\text{T}} < 5$ GeV. To evaluate the impact of using pseudorapidity instead of rapidity, measurements are also performed as a function of rapidity computed using a pion mass hypothesis. The fiducial and extrapolated results are compared with hydrodynamic calculations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Constraining $\alpha$-cluster compactness in $^{16}\rm O$ and $^{20}\rm Ne$ at TeV energies using azimuthal anisotropy

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    Elliptic flow in TeV OO and Ne–Ne collisions prefers loose α-cluster nuclear profiles over compact ones when compared to LHC Run 3 data in a hybrid IP-Glasma+MUSIC framework.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 37 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee, Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68(2018) 339, arXiv:1802.04801 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    The First fm/c of Heavy-Ion Collisions

    S. Schlichting and D. Teaney,The First fm/c of Heavy-Ion Collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69(2019) 447, arXiv:1908.02113 [nucl-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Bottom-up thermalization in heavy ion collisions

    R. Baier, A. H. Mueller, D. Schiff, and D. T. Son, ’Bottom up’ thermalization in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B502(2001) 51, arXiv:hep-ph/0009237

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  4. [4]

    QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venugopalan, QCD thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 035003, arXiv:2005.12299 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Heinz and B

    U. Heinz and B. Schenke,Hydrodynamic Description of the Quark-Gluon Plasma, (2024), arXiv:2412.19393 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    3+1D hydrodynamic simulation of relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, (3+1)D hydrodynamic simulation of relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C82(2010) 014903, arXiv:1004.1408 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    P. K. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 111601, arXiv:hep-th/0405231

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  8. [8]

    Viscosity Information from Relativistic Nuclear Collisions: How Perfect is the Fluid Observed at RHIC?

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke,Viscosity Information from Relativistic Nuclear Collisions: How Perfect is the Fluid Observed at RHIC?Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007) 172301, arXiv:0706.1522 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  9. [9]

    D. A. Teaney,Viscous Hydrodynamics and the Quark Gluon Plasma, Quark-gluon plasma 4 (2010) 207, ed. by R. C. Hwa and X.-N. Wang, arXiv:0905.2433 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Effective kinetic description of event-by-event pre-equilibrium dynamics in high-energy heavy-ion collisions

    A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, S. Schlichting, and D. Teaney,Effective kinetic description of event-by-event pre-equilibrium dynamics in high-energy heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C99(2019) 034910, arXiv:1805.00961 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Giacalone, A

    G. Giacalone, A. Mazeliauskas, and S. Schlichting,Hydrodynamic Attractors, Initial State Energy, and Particle Production in Relativistic Nuclear Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 262301, arXiv:1908.02866 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    J. D. Bjorken,Highly Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions: The Central Rapidity Region, Phys. Rev. D27(1983) 140

    1983

  13. [13]

    Universal attractor in a highly occupied non-Abelian plasma

    J. Berges, K. Boguslavski, S. Schlichting, and R. Venugopalan, Universal attractor in a highly occupied non-Abelian plasma, Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 114007, arXiv:1311.3005 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    The anisotropic non-equilibrium hydrodynamic attractor

    M. Strickland, J. Noronha, and G. S. Denicol,Anisotropic nonequilibrium hydrodynamic attractor, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 036020, arXiv:1709.06644 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Transverse momentum-flow correlations in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    P. Bożek,Transverse-momentum–flow correlations in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C93(2016) 044908, arXiv:1601.04513 [nucl-th]. 84

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    F. G. Gardim, G. Giacalone, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Themeantransversemomentumofultracentralheavy-ioncollisions:Anewprobeofhydrodynamics, Phys. Lett. B809(2020) 135749, arXiv:1909.11609 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of Long-Range Elliptic Azimuthal Anisotropies in√𝑠=13 and 2.76TeV𝑝 𝑝Collisions with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 172301, arXiv:1509.04776 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    CMS Collaboration,Evidence for collectivity in𝑝 𝑝collisions at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B765(2017) 193, arXiv:1606.06198 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    ALICE Collaboration, Multiplicity dependence of light-flavor hadron production in pp collisions at√𝑠= 7 TeV, Phys. Rev. C99(2019) 024906, arXiv:1807.11321 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of Associated Near-Side and Away-Side Long-Range Correlations in√𝑠NN =5.02TeV Proton–Lead Collisions with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 182302, arXiv:1212.5198 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    ALICE Collaboration, Long-range angular correlations on the near and away side in𝑝-Pb collisions at√𝑠𝑁 𝑁 =5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B719(2013) 29, arXiv:1212.2001 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    ALICE Collaboration, Enhanced production of multi-strange hadrons in high-multiplicity proton-proton collisions, Nature Phys.13(2017) 535, arXiv:1606.07424 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    ALICE Collaboration,Multiplicity Dependence of Pion, Kaon, Proton and Lambda Production in p-Pb Collisions at√𝑠𝑁 𝑁 = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B728(2014) 25, arXiv:1307.6796 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    J. L. Nagle and W. A. Zajc, Small System Collectivity in Relativistic Hadronic and Nuclear Collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68(2018) 211, arXiv:1801.03477 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    R. D. Weller and P. Romatschke,One fluid to rule them all: viscous hydrodynamic description of event-by-event central p+p, p+Pb and Pb+Pb collisions at√𝑠=5.02TeV, Phys. Lett. B774(2017) 351, arXiv:1701.07145 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Future physics opportunities for high-density QCD at the LHC with heavy-ion and proton beams

    Z. Citron et al., Future physics opportunities for high-density QCD at the LHC with heavy-ion and proton beams, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.7(2019) 1159, ed. by Z. Citron et al., arXiv:1812.06772 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Giacalone,Observing the deformation of nuclei with relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys

    G. Giacalone,Observing the deformation of nuclei with relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 202301, arXiv:1910.04673 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Giacalone, Constraining the quadrupole deformation of atomic nuclei with relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys

    G. Giacalone, Constraining the quadrupole deformation of atomic nuclei with relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C102(2020) 024901, arXiv:2004.14463 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Jia et al., Imaging the initial condition of heavy-ion collisions and nuclear structure across the nuclide chart, Nucl

    J. Jia et al., Imaging the initial condition of heavy-ion collisions and nuclear structure across the nuclide chart, Nucl. Sci. Tech.35(2024) 220, arXiv:2209.11042 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Frosini et al.,Multi-reference many-body perturbation theory for nuclei: II

    M. Frosini et al.,Multi-reference many-body perturbation theory for nuclei: II. Ab initio study of neon isotopes via PGCM and IM-NCSM calculations, Eur. Phys. J. A58(2022) 63, arXiv:2111.00797 [nucl-th]. 85

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Giacalone, B

    G. Giacalone et al., Exploiting 20Ne Isotopes for Precision Characterizations of Collectivity in Small Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 012302, arXiv:2402.05995 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Frosini, T

    M. Frosini, T. Duguet, J.-P. Ebran, and V. Somà, Multi-reference many-body perturbation theory for nuclei: I. Novel PGCM-PT formalism, Eur. Phys. J. A58(2022) 62, arXiv:2110.15737 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Frosini et al.,Multi-reference many-body perturbation theory for nuclei: III

    M. Frosini et al.,Multi-reference many-body perturbation theory for nuclei: III. Ab initio calculations at second order in PGCM-PT, Eur. Phys. J. A58(2022) 64, arXiv:2111.01461 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Lee,Lattice Effective Field Theory Simulations of Nuclei, Ann

    D. Lee,Lattice Effective Field Theory Simulations of Nuclei, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.75(2025) 109, arXiv:2501.03303 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    J. S. Moreland, J. E. Bernhard, and S. A. Bass,Alternative ansatz to wounded nucleon and binary collision scaling in high-energy nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C92(2015) 011901, arXiv:1412.4708 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    Flow Study in Relativistic Nuclear Collisions by Fourier Expansion of Azimuthal Particle Distributions

    S. Voloshin and Y. Zhang, Flow study in relativistic nuclear collisions by Fourier expansion of Azimuthal particle distributions, Z. Phys. C70(1996) 665, arXiv:hep-ph/9407282

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  37. [37]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy of charged particles in√𝑠NN =5.36TeV 16O+16O and20Ne+20Ne collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C113(2026) 045205, arXiv:2509.05171 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    CMS Collaboration,Observation of long-range collective flow in OO and NeNe collisions and implications for nuclear structure studies, (2025), arXiv:2510.02580 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    ALICE Collaboration,Evidence of nuclear geometry-driven anisotropic flow in OO and Ne−Ne collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.36 TeV, (2025), arXiv:2509.06428 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3(2008) S08003

    2008

  41. [41]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider: a description of the detector configuration for Run 3, JINST19(2024) P05063, arXiv:2305.16623 [physics.ins-det]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Insertable B-Layer: Technical Design Report, ATLAS-TDR-19; CERN-LHCC-2010-013, 2010, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1291633, Addendum: ATLAS-TDR-19-ADD-1; CERN-LHCC-2012-009, 2012,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1451888

    work page arXiv 2010

  43. [43]

    Production and Integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer

    B. Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST13(2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    Artamonov et al.,The ATLAS Forward Calorimeter, JINST3(2008) P02010

    A. Artamonov et al.,The ATLAS Forward Calorimeter, JINST3(2008) P02010

    2008

  45. [45]

    Avoni et al., Upgrades of the ATLAS zero degree calorimeter system for Run 3 at the Large Hadron Collider, JINST20(2025) P11021, arXiv:2509.05948 [physics.ins-det]

    G. Avoni et al., Upgrades of the ATLAS zero degree calorimeter system for Run 3 at the Large Hadron Collider, JINST20(2025) P11021, arXiv:2509.05948 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

    G. Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017. 86

    2018

  47. [47]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS trigger system for LHC Run 3 and trigger performance in 2022, JINST19(2024) P06029, arXiv:2401.06630 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Computing Acknowledgements, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2026-001, 2026, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2952666

    work page arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS transition radiation detector (TRT) Fast-OR trigger, ATL-INDET-PUB-2009-002, 2009,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1229213

    work page arXiv 2009

  50. [50]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST15(2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS track reconstruction algorithms in dense environments in LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 673, arXiv:1704.07983 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Vertex Reconstruction Performance of the ATLAS Detector at√𝑠=13TeV , ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-026, 2015,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2037717

    work page arXiv 2015

  53. [53]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Development of ATLAS Primary Vertex Reconstruction for LHC Run 3, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2019-015, 2019,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2670380

    work page arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Track and Vertex Reconstruction with the ATLAS Inner Detector, (2026), arXiv:2605.07585 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Topological cell clustering in the ATLAS calorimeters and its performance in LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 490, arXiv:1603.02934 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy for charged particle production in√𝑠NN =2.76TeV lead–lead collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C86(2012) 014907, arXiv:1203.3087 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  57. [57]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the pseudorapidity and transverse momentum dependence of the elliptic flow of charged particles in lead–lead collisions at√𝑠NN =2.76TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B707(2012) 330, arXiv:1108.6018 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  58. [58]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy of charged-particle production in Xe+Xe collisions at√𝑠NN =5.44TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C101(2020) 024906, arXiv:1911.04812 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    M. L. Miller, K. Reygers, S. J. Sanders, and P. Steinberg, Glauber Modeling in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57(2007) 205, arXiv:nucl-ex/0701025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  60. [60]

    Loizides, Phys

    C. Loizides,Glauber predictions for oxygen and neon collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C113(2026) 014914, arXiv:2507.05853 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    Lee,Recent Progress in Nuclear Lattice Simulations, Frontiers in PhysicsVolume 8(2020)

    D. Lee,Recent Progress in Nuclear Lattice Simulations, Frontiers in PhysicsVolume 8(2020)

    2020

  62. [62]

    Nijs and W

    G. Nijs and W. van der Schee,Predictions and postdictions for relativistic lead and oxygen collisions with the computational simulation code Trajectum, Phys. Rev. C106(2022) 044903, arXiv:2110.13153 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Wang and M

    X.-N. Wang and M. Gyulassy, HIJING: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in pp, pA, and AA collisions, Phys. Rev. D44(1991) 3501. 87

    1991

  64. [64]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv:1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  65. [65]

    Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl

    S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(2003) 250

    2003

  66. [66]

    Charged-particle multiplicities in pp interactions measured with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration, Charged-particle multiplicities in𝑝 𝑝interactions measured with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, New J. Phys.13(2011) 053033, arXiv:1012.5104 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  67. [67]

    ALICE Collaboration, Production of pions, kaons, (anti-)protons and𝜙mesons in Xe–Xe collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.44 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 584, arXiv:2101.03100 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    EPOS LHC : test of collective hadronization with LHC data

    T. Pierog, I. Karpenko, J. M. Katzy, E. Yatsenko, and K. Werner,EPOS LHC: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C92(2015) 034906, arXiv:1306.0121 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  69. [69]

    Hagedorn, Multiplicities,𝑝 𝑇 distributions and the expected hadron→quark-gluon phase transition, Riv

    R. Hagedorn, Multiplicities,𝑝 𝑇 distributions and the expected hadron→quark-gluon phase transition, Riv. Nuovo Cim.6(1983) 1

    1983

  70. [70]

    Thermal phenomenology of hadrons from 200 AGeV S+S collisions

    E. Schnedermann, J. Sollfrank, and U. Heinz, Thermal phenomenology of hadrons from 200A GeV S+S collisions, Phys. Rev. C48(1993) 2462, arXiv:nucl-th/9307020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  71. [71]

    Mäntysaari, B

    H. Mäntysaari, B. Schenke, C. Shen, and W. Zhao, Collision-Energy Dependence in Heavy-Ion Collisions from Nonlinear QCD Evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 022302, arXiv:2502.05138 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Lattice simulations for few- and many-body systems

    D. Lee,Lattice simulations for few- and many-body systems, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.63(2009) 117, arXiv:0804.3501 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  73. [73]

    Fluctuating Glasma initial conditions and flow in heavy ion collisions

    B. Schenke, P. Tribedy, and R. Venugopalan, Fluctuating Glasma initial conditions and flow in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 252301, arXiv:1202.6646 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  74. [74]

    Relativistic Hadron-Hadron Collisions in the Ultra-Relativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics Model (UrQMD)

    M. Bleicher et al., Relativistic hadron-hadron collisions in the ultra-relativistic quantum molecular dynamics model, J. Phys. G25(1999) 1859, arXiv:hep-ph/9909407

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  75. [75]

    S. A. Bass et al.,Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.41(1998) 255, arXiv:nucl-th/9803035

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  76. [76]

    G. Nijs, W. van der Schee, U. Gürsoy, and R. Snellings, Bayesian analysis of heavy ion collisions with the heavy ion computational framework Trajectum, Phys. Rev. C103(2021) 054909, arXiv:2010.15134 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    Giacalone, G

    G. Giacalone, G. Nijs, and W. van der Schee, Determination of the Neutron Skin of208Pb from Ultrarelativistic Nuclear Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 202302, arXiv:2305.00015 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    Werner,EPOS4: New theoretical concepts for modeling proton-proton and ion-ion scattering at very high energies, (2024), arXiv:2410.09955 [hep-ph]

    K. Werner,EPOS4: New theoretical concepts for modeling proton-proton and ion-ion scattering at very high energies, (2024), arXiv:2410.09955 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    K. Werner,Revealing a deep connection between factorization and saturation: New insight into modeling high-energy proton-proton and nucleus-nucleus scattering in the EPOS4 framework, Phys. Rev. C108(2023) 064903, arXiv:2301.12517 [hep-ph]. 88

    work page arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    Werner and B

    K. Werner and B. Guiot, Perturbative QCD concerning light and heavy flavor in the EPOS4 framework, Phys. Rev. C108(2023) 034904, arXiv:2306.02396 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.