Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.3

The apparent time dependence of the one-loop curvature power spectrum cancels when all loop scales and boundary terms are combined consistently.

2026-06-29 02:30 UTC pith:32LN6KXZ

load-bearing objection The paper shows that dropping the k >> q assumption and adding all-scale contributions plus boundary terms makes the one-loop time dependence cancel in the curvature power spectrum. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2606.28247 v1 pith:32LN6KXZ submitted 2026-06-26 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

Cancellation of one-loop time dependence in superhorizon curvature perturbations from all scales

classification astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords one-loop correctionscurvature perturbationssuperhorizon conservationinflationδN formalismspatially-flat gaugeboundary termsloop integrals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that superhorizon curvature perturbations remain conserved at one-loop order in inflation, without net time dependence, when loop integrals cover all wavenumbers rather than assuming a scale hierarchy. It achieves this by applying the δN formalism to connect inflaton fluctuations to curvature perturbations and retaining boundary terms that previous treatments omitted. A reader cares because this removes a potential inconsistency in one-loop predictions for the primordial power spectrum that seeds cosmic structure. The result applies in spatially-flat gauge and treats both k much larger than q and k comparable to or smaller than q on equal footing.

Core claim

In spatially-flat gauge, the one-loop curvature power spectrum on superhorizon scales shows no residual time dependence once the nonlinear δN relation between inflaton fluctuations and curvature perturbations is used and all contributions, including boundary terms from loop integrals over every scale, are retained consistently.

What carries the argument

The δN formalism that nonlinearly relates inflaton fluctuations to curvature perturbations, applied while integrating loop modes over all wavenumbers without a k ≫ q assumption and retaining boundary terms.

Load-bearing premise

The nonlinear mapping from inflaton fluctuations to curvature perturbations given by the δN formalism stays valid at one-loop order with no additional gauge or interaction corrections.

What would settle it

An explicit recomputation of the one-loop power spectrum that keeps the k ≲ q regime and boundary terms yet still finds uncancelled time dependence on superhorizon scales.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Superhorizon curvature perturbations are conserved at one-loop order for any loop wavenumber.
  • The curvature power spectrum can be computed without restricting to k much larger than the external mode q.
  • Boundary terms must be kept to obtain a time-independent result.
  • The cancellation holds in spatially-flat gauge when the δN relation is used throughout.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar all-scale consistency might remove time dependence in higher-loop or multi-field calculations.
  • Gauge-invariant observables could require explicit retention of boundary contributions whenever nonlinear field redefinitions are involved.
  • Numerical checks of the power spectrum at fixed superhorizon times could test whether the cancellation persists beyond analytic approximations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the apparent time dependence in the one-loop superhorizon curvature power spectrum cancels when all loop contributions (including from modes with k ≲ q) are combined consistently with boundary terms, using the nonlinear δN relation between inflaton fluctuations and ζ in spatially-flat gauge, without assuming a scale hierarchy.

Significance. If the cancellation holds after all scales and terms are included, the result would confirm conservation of superhorizon ζ at one-loop order and strengthen the reliability of δN-based calculations of loop corrections to the power spectrum and non-Gaussianity. The absence of free parameters in the final cancellation and the explicit treatment of the full k-range are strengths.

major comments (1)
  1. [δN formalism application (abstract and main derivation sections)] The central cancellation result rests on the assumption that the δN mapping from inflaton fluctuation to ζ remains exact at one-loop order with no additional gauge or interaction corrections when the loop integral includes modes with k ≲ q. This assumption is load-bearing for the claim that all contributions combine to cancel time dependence, yet the manuscript does not provide an explicit verification or counterterm analysis for the non-hierarchical regime.
minor comments (1)
  1. Clarify the precise definition and handling of boundary terms in the one-loop integrals to ensure reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the importance of the δN formalism's applicability across all scales. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [δN formalism application (abstract and main derivation sections)] The central cancellation result rests on the assumption that the δN mapping from inflaton fluctuation to ζ remains exact at one-loop order with no additional gauge or interaction corrections when the loop integral includes modes with k ≲ q. This assumption is load-bearing for the claim that all contributions combine to cancel time dependence, yet the manuscript does not provide an explicit verification or counterterm analysis for the non-hierarchical regime.

    Authors: The δN formalism supplies the exact, nonlinear relation between the inflaton fluctuation δφ (in spatially flat gauge) and the curvature perturbation ζ on uniform-density slices; this relation follows directly from the definition of ζ and holds order by order without further gauge or interaction corrections at one-loop level. Our calculation implements this mapping uniformly for every mode in the loop integral, with no scale hierarchy imposed and with the regime k ≲ q treated on the same footing as k ≫ q. All time-dependent pieces, including those arising from the nonlinear expansion and the associated boundary terms, are retained and shown to cancel identically once the full set of contributions is assembled. Because the cancellation is obtained by direct, consistent application of the δN relation over the complete k range, a separate counterterm analysis is not required at this perturbative order; the result is parameter-free and follows from the gauge-invariant construction itself. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses established external δN formalism

full rationale

The paper's central result is a perturbative cancellation of apparent time dependence in the one-loop superhorizon curvature power spectrum when all scales (including k ≲ q) and boundary terms are included. This is obtained by applying the standard δN formalism to relate inflaton fluctuations to ζ, which is an independent, externally established relation from prior literature and not derived or fitted inside the paper. No self-citation chains, self-definitional reductions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or ansatzes smuggled via author citations are present in the described derivation. The calculation is self-contained against external benchmarks once the δN mapping is granted.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, new entities, or detailed axioms beyond standard tools; full paper would be required for exhaustive ledger.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption δN formalism applies to relate inflaton fluctuations to curvature perturbations at one-loop level
    Invoked in abstract as the method to account for nonlinear relations
  • domain assumption Spatially-flat gauge is suitable for the one-loop calculation of curvature perturbations
    Specified in abstract as the gauge used

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5636 in / 1341 out tokens · 60963 ms · 2026-06-29T02:30:37.654223+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We show the conservation of the superhorizon curvature perturbations at one-loop level in spatially-flat gauge, including contributions from loop wavenumbers on all scales. In contrast to previous works, we do not assume a hierarchy $k \gg q$ between the wavenumber of the loop integral, $k$, and that of the power spectrum, $q$, and we explicitly include the regime $k \lesssim q$. Taking into account the nonlinear relation between the inflaton fluctuation and the curvature perturbation with the $\delta N$ formalism, we show that the apparent time dependence of the one-loop curvature power spectrum cancels once all contributions, including boundary terms, are combined consistently.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28247 by Keisuke Inomata.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Diagrams for the one-vertex contribution, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Diagrams for the tadpole contribution, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Diagram for the cut-in-the-middle contribution, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Diagrams for the cut-in-the-side contribution, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Background-independent one-loop renormalization of tensor and scalar primordial spectra

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    UV divergences of one-loop primordial tensor and scalar spectra are absorbed by covariant and tadpole counterterms using only the universal WKB expansion of internal modes, yielding finite model-independent renormaliz...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 43 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    In our previous works, we focused on the situation where the linear relation between them is a good approximation for simplicity

    We take into account the nonlinear relation between the curvature perturbationζand the inflaton fluctuation δϕin spatially-flat gauge. In our previous works, we focused on the situation where the linear relation between them is a good approximation for simplicity. In this work, we will see that the loop contributions fromk≲qgenerally cancel through the no...

  2. [2]

    8 ˆ τ τi dτ ′a4(τ ′)V(3)(τ ′)Im[u0(τ)u ∗ 0(τ ′)] 1 ˙¯ϕ(τ) T(q, τ f , τ ′, τi) +C(q, τ f , τi) # = 2π2 q3 Pζ,tr(q)

    We consider the transition: the initial period→slow-roll (SR) period→the late period. We assume that the tree-level curvature perturbations onk≲qremain constant after the initial period. In contrast to our previous works, we do not assumeV (3) = 0 (V(3): third derivative of the inflaton potential) for any of the above periods, including the SR period. We ...

  3. [3]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, JETP Lett.33, 532 (1981)

  4. [4]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, Sov. Phys. JETP56, 258 (1982)

  5. [5]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B117, 175 (1982)

  6. [6]

    A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 1110 (1982)

  7. [7]

    Panagiotakopoulos, A

    C. Panagiotakopoulos, A. Salam, and J. A. Strathdee, Phys. Lett. B115, 29 (1982)

  8. [8]

    J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D28, 679 (1983)

  9. [9]

    G. F. Chapline, Nature253, 251 (1975)

  10. [10]

    Ivanov, P

    P. Ivanov, P. Naselsky, and I. Novikov, Phys. Rev. D50, 7173 (1994)

  11. [11]

    Formation of MACHO-Primordial Black Holes in Inflationary Cosmology

    J. Yokoyama, Astron. Astrophys.318, 673 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9509027

  12. [12]

    Density Perturbations and Black Hole Formation in Hybrid Inflation

    J. Garcia-Bellido, A. D. Linde, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev.D54, 6040 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9605094 [astro-ph]

  13. [13]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: The Power Spectrum and Evaporation of Early Structures

    N. Afshordi, P. McDonald, and D. N. Spergel, Astrophys. J. Lett.594, L71 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0302035

  14. [14]

    P. H. Frampton, M. Kawasaki, F. Takahashi, and T. T. Yanagida, JCAP1004, 023 (2010), arXiv:1001.2308 [hep-ph]

  15. [15]

    K. M. Belotsky, A. D. Dmitriev, E. A. Esipova, V. A. Gani, A. V. Grobov, M. Y. Khlopov, A. A. Kirillov, S. G. Rubin, and I. V. Svadkovsky, Mod. Phys. Lett. A29, 1440005 (2014), arXiv:1410.0203 [astro-ph.CO]

  16. [16]

    B. Carr, F. Kuhnel, and M. Sandstad, Phys. Rev.D94, 083504 (2016), arXiv:1607.06077 [astro-ph.CO]

  17. [17]

    Inflationary Primordial Black Holes as All Dark Matter

    K. Inomata, M. Kawasaki, K. Mukaida, Y. Tada, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev.D96, 043504 (2017), arXiv:1701.02544 [astro-ph.CO]

  18. [18]

    J. R. Espinosa, D. Racco, and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 121301 (2018), arXiv:1710.11196 [hep-ph]

  19. [19]

    S. Bird, I. Cholis, J. B. Mu˜ noz, Y. Ali-Ha¨ ımoud, M. Kamionkowski, E. D. Kovetz, A. Raccanelli, and A. G. Riess, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 201301 (2016), arXiv:1603.00464 [astro-ph.CO]

  20. [20]

    The clustering of massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: measuring their mass distribution with Advanced LIGO

    S. Clesse and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, Phys. Dark Univ.10, 002 (2016), arXiv:1603.05234 [astro-ph.CO]

  21. [21]

    Primordial Black Hole Scenario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 061101 (2016), arXiv:1603.08338 [astro-ph.CO]

  22. [22]

    Y. N. Eroshenko, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.1051, 012010 (2018), arXiv:1604.04932 [astro-ph.CO]

  23. [23]

    Primordial Black Holes - Perspectives in Gravitational Wave Astronomy -

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 063001 (2018), arXiv:1801.05235 [astro- ph.CO]

  24. [24]

    B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, Rept. Prog. Phys.84, 116902 (2021), arXiv:2002.12778 [astro-ph.CO]

  25. [25]

    A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh, J. Phys. G48, 043001 (2021), arXiv:2007.10722 [astro-ph.CO]

  26. [26]

    Escriv` a, F

    A. Escriv` a, F. Kuhnel, and Y. Tada, (2022), 10.1016/B978-0-32-395636-9.00012-8, arXiv:2211.05767 [astro-ph.CO]

  27. [27]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

  28. [28]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics

    A. Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L11 (2023), arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

  29. [29]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals

    J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA:), Astron. Astrophys.678, A50 (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

  30. [30]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array: IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter and the early Universe

    J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA), Astron. Astrophys.685, A94 (2024), arXiv:2306.16227 [astro-ph.CO]

  31. [31]

    D. J. Reardonet al., Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L6 (2023), arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

  32. [32]

    Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

    H. Xuet al., Res. Astron. Astrophys.23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

  33. [33]

    Quantum Contributions to Cosmological Correlations

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D72, 043514 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0506236

  34. [34]

    On Loops in Inflation

    L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, JHEP12, 008 (2010), arXiv:0912.2734 [hep-th]

  35. [35]

    Constraining Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 221003 (2024), arXiv:2211.03395 [hep-th]

  36. [36]
  37. [37]

    No-go for the formation of heavy mass Primordial Black Holes in Single Field Inflation

    S. Choudhury, M. R. Gangopadhyay, and M. Sami, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 884 (2024), arXiv:2301.10000 [astro-ph.CO]

  38. [38]

    Note on the bispectrum and one-loop corrections in single-field inflation with primordial black hole formation

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D109, 103541 (2024), arXiv:2303.00341 [hep-th]

  39. [39]
  40. [40]

    Firouzjahi, JCAP10, 006 (2023), arXiv:2303.12025 [astro-ph.CO]

    H. Firouzjahi, JCAP10, 006 (2023), arXiv:2303.12025 [astro-ph.CO]

  41. [41]

    Motohashi and Y

    H. Motohashi and Y. Tada, JCAP08, 069 (2023), arXiv:2303.16035 [astro-ph.CO]

  42. [42]

    Primordial Black Holes and Loops in Single-Field Inflation

    H. Firouzjahi and A. Riotto, JCAP02, 021 (2024), arXiv:2304.07801 [astro-ph.CO]

  43. [43]

    One loop to rule them all: Perturbativity in the presence of ultra slow-roll dynamics

    G. Franciolini, A. Iovino, Junior., M. Taoso, and A. Urbano, Phys. Rev. D109, 123550 (2024), arXiv:2305.03491 [astro- ph.CO]

  44. [44]

    A large $|\eta|$ approach to single field inflation

    G. Tasinato, Phys. Rev. D108, 043526 (2023), arXiv:2305.11568 [hep-th]

  45. [45]

    Cheng, D.-S

    S.-L. Cheng, D.-S. Lee, and K.-W. Ng, JCAP03, 008 (2024), arXiv:2305.16810 [astro-ph.CO]

  46. [46]

    Maity, H

    S. Maity, H. V. Ragavendra, S. K. Sethi, and L. Sriramkumar, JCAP05, 046 (2024), arXiv:2307.13636 [astro-ph.CO]

  47. [47]

    Revisiting Loop Corrections in Single Field USR Inflation

    H. Firouzjahi, Phys. Rev. D109, 043514 (2024), arXiv:2311.04080 [astro-ph.CO]

  48. [48]

    M. W. Davies, L. Iacconi, and D. J. Mulryne, JCAP04, 050 (2024), arXiv:2312.05694 [astro-ph.CO]

  49. [49]

    Iacconi, D

    L. Iacconi, D. Mulryne, and D. Seery, JCAP06, 062 (2024), arXiv:2312.12424 [astro-ph.CO]

  50. [50]

    Saburov and S

    S. Saburov and S. V. Ketov, Universe10, 354 (2024), arXiv:2402.02934 [gr-qc]

  51. [51]

    One-loop power spectrum in ultra slow-roll inflation and implications for primordial black hole dark matter

    G. Ballesteros and J. G. Egea, JCAP07, 052 (2024), arXiv:2404.07196 [astro-ph.CO]

  52. [52]

    Kristiano and J

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, JCAP10, 036 (2024), arXiv:2405.12145 [astro-ph.CO]

  53. [53]

    Generating Large Primordial Fluctuations in Single-Field Inflation for Primordial Black Hole Formation,

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, “Generating Large Primordial Fluctuations in Single-Field Inflation for Primordial Black Hole Formation,” (2025) arXiv:2405.12149 [astro-ph.CO]

  54. [54]

    Sheikhahmadi and A

    H. Sheikhahmadi and A. Nassiri-Rad, (2024), arXiv:2411.18525 [astro-ph.CO]

  55. [55]

    Frolovsky and S

    D. Frolovsky and S. V. Ketov, Phys. Rev. D111, 083533 (2025), arXiv:2502.00628 [gr-qc]

  56. [56]

    Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics

    J. Fumagalli, JHEP05, 162 (2025), arXiv:2305.19263 [astro-ph.CO]

  57. [57]

    Y. Tada, T. Terada, and J. Tokuda, JHEP01, 105 (2024), arXiv:2308.04732 [hep-th]

  58. [58]

    Superhorizon Curvature Perturbations Are Protected against One-Loop Corrections

    K. Inomata, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 141001 (2024), arXiv:2403.04682 [astro-ph.CO]

  59. [59]

    Kawaguchi, S

    R. Kawaguchi, S. Tsujikawa, and Y. Yamada, JHEP12, 095 (2024), arXiv:2407.19742 [hep-th]

  60. [60]
  61. [61]

    Inomata, Phys

    K. Inomata, Phys. Rev. D111, 103504 (2025), arXiv:2502.08707 [astro-ph.CO]

  62. [62]

    Fang, Z.-H

    C.-J. Fang, Z.-H. Lyu, C. Chen, and Z.-K. Guo, Phys. Rev. D112, 023547 (2025), arXiv:2502.09555 [gr-qc]

  63. [63]

    Role of the counterterms in the conservation of superhorizon curvature perturbations at one loop

    K. Inomata, Phys. Rev. D111, 123517 (2025), arXiv:2502.12112 [astro-ph.CO]

  64. [64]

    Ward Identity Constraints on Loop Corrections in Non-Attractor Inflation

    C.-J. Fang, Z.-H. Lyu, C. Chen, and Z.-K. Guo, (2025), arXiv:2507.00077 [astro-ph.CO]

  65. [65]

    Braglia and L

    M. Braglia and L. Pinol, Phys. Rev. D113, 063513 (2026), arXiv:2504.07926 [astro-ph.CO]

  66. [66]

    Freezing of the renormalized one-loop primordial scalar power spectrum,

    M. Braglia and L. Pinol, Phys. Rev. D113, L061302 (2026), arXiv:2504.13136 [astro-ph.CO]

  67. [67]

    Inflationary background renormalization

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, (2025), arXiv:2504.18514 [hep-th]

  68. [68]

    Iacconi, D

    L. Iacconi, D. Mulryne, and D. Seery, (2026), arXiv:2601.14229 [astro-ph.CO]

  69. [69]

    Y. Ema, M. Hong, R. Jinno, and K. Mukaida, (2026), arXiv:2603.01961 [astro-ph.CO]

  70. [70]

    Locality in effective field theory for inflationary soft modes

    T. Tanaka and Y. Urakawa, (2026), arXiv:2605.19331 [gr-qc]

  71. [71]

    D. H. Lyth, K. A. Malik, and M. Sasaki, JCAP05, 004 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0411220

  72. [72]

    Conserved non-linear quantities in cosmology

    D. Langlois and F. Vernizzi, Phys. Rev. D72, 103501 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0509078

  73. [73]

    G. L. Pimentel, L. Senatore, and M. Zaldarriaga, JHEP07, 166 (2012), arXiv:1203.6651 [hep-th]

  74. [74]

    Finite parts of inflationary loops II: A streamlined UV in-in algorithm and distinguishable signatures

    G. Ballesteros, J. G. Egea, and F. Riccardi, (2025), arXiv:2512.20467 [hep-th]

  75. [75]

    Scale-Dependent Loop Corrections to the Inflationary Power Spectrum,

    M. Braglia, S. C´ espedes, and L. Pinol, (2026), arXiv:2603.12216 [astro-ph.CO]

  76. [76]

    Fixing the Renormalization of Inflationary Loops via Ward Identities

    C.-J. Fang and Z.-K. Guo, (2026), arXiv:2605.13325 [gr-qc]

  77. [77]

    Equilateral Non-Gaussianity and New Physics on the Horizon

    D. Baumann and D. Green, JCAP09, 014 (2011), arXiv:1102.5343 [hep-th]

  78. [78]

    The Conformal Limit of Inflation in the Era of CMB Polarimetry

    E. Pajer, G. L. Pimentel, and J. V. S. Van Wijck, JCAP06, 009 (2017), arXiv:1609.06993 [hep-th]

  79. [79]

    J. M. Maldacena, JHEP05, 013 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0210603

  80. [80]

    Mahoney, and Kurt Keutzer

    A. Caravano, E. Komatsu, K. D. Lozanov, and J. Weller, JCAP12, 010 (2021), arXiv:2102.06378 [astro-ph.CO]

Showing first 80 references.