pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (50%).

35 Pith papers citing it
Background 50% of classified citations
abstract

We introduce Ragas (Retrieval Augmented Generation Assessment), a framework for reference-free evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines. RAG systems are composed of a retrieval and an LLM based generation module, and provide LLMs with knowledge from a reference textual database, which enables them to act as a natural language layer between a user and textual databases, reducing the risk of hallucinations. Evaluating RAG architectures is, however, challenging because there are several dimensions to consider: the ability of the retrieval system to identify relevant and focused context passages, the ability of the LLM to exploit such passages in a faithful way, or the quality of the generation itself. With Ragas, we put forward a suite of metrics which can be used to evaluate these different dimensions \textit{without having to rely on ground truth human annotations}. We posit that such a framework can crucially contribute to faster evaluation cycles of RAG architectures, which is especially important given the fast adoption of LLMs.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 6

citation-polarity summary

roles

background 5

clear filters

representative citing papers

Four-Axis Decision Alignment for Long-Horizon Enterprise AI Agents

cs.AI · 2026-04-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Long-horizon enterprise AI agents' decisions decompose into four measurable axes, with benchmark experiments on six memory architectures revealing distinct weaknesses and reversing a pre-registered prediction on summarization.

DOTRAG: Retrieval-Time Reasoning Along Paths

cs.IR · 2026-04-06 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

DotRAG reformulates graph retrieval as query-guided path reasoning with Division of Thought, reporting SOTA results on MetaQA and UltraDomain for multi-hop tasks.

Agreement Metrics for LLM-as-Judge Evaluation: What to Report and Why

cs.CL · 2026-05-25 · conditional · novelty 6.0

For binary LLM judge validation, Pearson's r, Spearman's ρ, Kendall's τ_b, phi, and Matthews correlation all equal a single number on non-degenerate data, Cohen's κ supplies the extra signal on label-rate drift, and a reporting checklist is provided.

RAG-Enabled Intent Reasoning for Application-Network Interaction

cs.NI · 2025-05-14 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Proposes an intent-RAG framework that combines RAG, machine reasoning, and generative AI to interpret application intents and generate network intents, outperforming LLMs and vanilla RAG in translation tasks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 27 of 27 citing papers after filters.