Pith. sign in

super hub Mixed citations

GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learning

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (56%).

114 Pith papers citing it
Background 56% of classified citations
abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adapted to downstream tasks via reinforcement learning (RL) methods like Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), which often require thousands of rollouts to learn new tasks. We argue that the interpretable nature of language often provides a much richer learning medium for LLMs, compared to policy gradients derived from sparse, scalar rewards. To test this, we introduce GEPA (Genetic-Pareto), a prompt optimizer that thoroughly incorporates natural language reflection to learn high-level rules from trial and error. Given any AI system containing one or more LLM prompts, GEPA samples trajectories (e.g., reasoning, tool calls, and tool outputs) and reflects on them in natural language to diagnose problems, propose and test prompt updates, and combine complementary lessons from the Pareto frontier of its own attempts. As a result of GEPA's design, it can often turn even just a few rollouts into a large quality gain. Across six tasks, GEPA outperforms GRPO by 6% on average and by up to 20%, while using up to 35x fewer rollouts. GEPA also outperforms the leading prompt optimizer, MIPROv2, by over 10% (e.g., +12% accuracy on AIME-2025), and demonstrates promising results as an inference-time search strategy for code optimization. We release our code at https://github.com/gepa-ai/gepa .

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 18 method 5 baseline 3 other 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adapted to downstream tasks via reinforcement learning (RL) methods like Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), which often require thousands of rollouts to learn new tasks. We argue that the interpretable nature of language often provides a much richer learning medium for LLMs, compared to policy gradients derived from sparse, scalar rewards. To test this, we introduce GEPA (Genetic-Pareto), a prompt optimizer that thoroughly incorporates natural language reflection to learn high-level rules from trial and error. Given any AI system containing

authors

co-cited works

representative citing papers

Continual Harness: Online Adaptation for Self-Improving Foundation Agents

cs.LG · 2026-05-11 · conditional · novelty 8.0

Continual Harness automates online self-improvement for foundation-model embodied agents by refining prompts, sub-agents, skills, and memory within one run, cutting button-press costs on Pokemon Red and Emerald and closing much of the gap to expert harnesses.

Agentic Abstention: Do Agents Know When to Stop Instead of Act?

cs.AI · 2026-06-27 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

LLM agents often fail to abstain at the right time in uncertain multi-turn tasks, and the CONVOLVE context engineering method raises timely abstention rates on WebShop from 26.7 to 57.4 without parameter updates.

Decentralized Multi-Agent Systems with Shared Context

cs.MA · 2026-06-09 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

DeLM decentralizes LLM multi-agent coordination with shared verified context, delivering up to 10.5pp gains on SWE-bench Verified and 5.7pp on LongBench-v2 while cutting cost per task by ~50%.

PACE: Anytime-Valid Acceptance Tests for Self-Evolving Agents

cs.AI · 2026-06-06 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

PACE is a training-free anytime-valid commit gate using testing-by-betting e-processes that controls per-candidate false-commit probability for self-evolving agents and reduces spurious edits compared to greedy acceptance.

Cost-Aware Optimization for Agentic Query Execution

cs.DB · 2026-06-02 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

EnumGRPO is a self-improving optimizer for agentic query execution that reduces LLM-operator costs by ~317x while improving accuracy by 18% over a hybrid baseline across four databases.

CORE: Contrastive Reflection Enables Rapid Improvements in Reasoning

cs.AI · 2026-05-27 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

CORE distills contrasts between successful and unsuccessful reasoning traces into compact natural-language insights that enable faster model self-improvement on reasoning tasks with fewer rollouts than parametric or other non-parametric baselines.

Evolutionary Multi-Task Optimization for LLM-Guided Program Discovery

cs.LG · 2026-05-21 · conditional · novelty 7.0

EMO-STA evolves a shared program archive across task families then adapts candidates to targets, outperforming matched-compute single-task evolution in most of eight families while reducing overfitting on low-data tasks like ARC.

Residual Skill Optimization for Text-to-SQL Ensembles

cs.CL · 2026-05-20 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Residual skill optimization creates complementary Text-to-SQL agents by training each new skill on prior ensemble failures, yielding accuracy gains on Spider2-Lite and transfer to other dialects and tasks.

What Do Evolutionary Coding Agents Evolve?

cs.NE · 2026-05-19 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Evolutionary coding agents achieve most benchmark gains through a small subset of edit types and by cycling previously deleted code lines rather than developing new algorithmic structures.

Hidden in Memory: Sleeper Memory Poisoning in LLM Agents

cs.CR · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Sleeper memory poisoning enables adversaries to inject fabricated user memories into LLM agents via manipulated external contexts, which are later retrieved and used to induce attacker-intended actions with 60-89% success across models.

Harnessing Agentic Evolution

cs.AI · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

AEvo introduces a meta-agent that edits the evolution procedure or agent context based on accumulated state, outperforming baselines by 26% relative improvement on agentic benchmarks and achieving SOTA on open-ended tasks.

Learning, Fast and Slow: Towards LLMs That Adapt Continually

cs.LG · 2026-05-12 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Fast-Slow Training uses context optimization as fast weights alongside parameter updates as slow weights to achieve up to 3x better sample efficiency, higher performance, and less catastrophic forgetting than standard RL in continual LLM learning.

SmellBench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Architectural Code Smell Repair

cs.SE · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

SmellBench is the first benchmark showing LLM agents resolve 47.7% of architectural code smells while accurately spotting false positives, but aggressive repairs often introduce new smells and degrade overall quality.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 114 citing papers.