Pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions

Canonical reference. 85% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

77 Pith papers citing it
215 external citations · Pith
Background 85% of classified citations
abstract

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has marked a significant breakthrough in natural language processing (NLP), fueling a paradigm shift in information acquisition. Nevertheless, LLMs are prone to hallucination, generating plausible yet nonfactual content. This phenomenon raises significant concerns over the reliability of LLMs in real-world information retrieval (IR) systems and has attracted intensive research to detect and mitigate such hallucinations. Given the open-ended general-purpose attributes inherent to LLMs, LLM hallucinations present distinct challenges that diverge from prior task-specific models. This divergence highlights the urgency for a nuanced understanding and comprehensive overview of recent advances in LLM hallucinations. In this survey, we begin with an innovative taxonomy of hallucination in the era of LLM and then delve into the factors contributing to hallucinations. Subsequently, we present a thorough overview of hallucination detection methods and benchmarks. Our discussion then transfers to representative methodologies for mitigating LLM hallucinations. Additionally, we delve into the current limitations faced by retrieval-augmented LLMs in combating hallucinations, offering insights for developing more robust IR systems. Finally, we highlight the promising research directions on LLM hallucinations, including hallucination in large vision-language models and understanding of knowledge boundaries in LLM hallucinations.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 13

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey

cs.IR · 2024-09-16 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Introduces Trust-RAG Compass framework and TRC Bench benchmark to assess RAG trustworthiness across factuality, robustness, fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy, with evaluations showing performance gaps between LLMs.

Prompt Compression via Activation Aggregation

cs.CL · 2026-07-09 · conditional · novelty 6.0

A learned weighted sum of intermediate-layer activations compresses an instruction prompt into a single patch vector that, injected at an early layer, recovers task accuracy within ~2% of the full prompt.

Reclaim Evaluation: A Lossy Memory Is Worse Than an Empty One

cs.CL · 2026-06-24 · conditional · novelty 6.0

A memory that keeps a wrong conclusion while dropping the source makes an LLM confidently repeat the error; keeping the source instead lets a later correction recover the truth at the same budget.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 77 citing papers.