Pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervision

Canonical reference. 94% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

63 Pith papers citing it
6 external citations · Pith
Background 94% of classified citations
abstract

Complex multi-step reasoning tasks, such as solving mathematical problems or generating code, remain a significant hurdle for even the most advanced large language models (LLMs). Verifying LLM outputs with an Outcome Reward Model (ORM) is a standard inference-time technique aimed at enhancing the reasoning performance of LLMs. However, this still proves insufficient for reasoning tasks with a lengthy or multi-hop reasoning chain, where the intermediate outcomes are neither properly rewarded nor penalized. Process supervision addresses this limitation by assigning intermediate rewards during the reasoning process. To date, the methods used to collect process supervision data have relied on either human annotation or per-step Monte Carlo estimation, both prohibitively expensive to scale, thus hindering the broad application of this technique. In response to this challenge, we propose a novel divide-and-conquer style Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) algorithm named \textit{OmegaPRM} for the efficient collection of high-quality process supervision data. This algorithm swiftly identifies the first error in the Chain of Thought (CoT) with binary search and balances the positive and negative examples, thereby ensuring both efficiency and quality. As a result, we are able to collect over 1.5 million process supervision annotations to train Process Reward Models (PRMs). This fully automated process supervision alongside the weighted self-consistency algorithm is able to enhance LLMs' math reasoning performances. We improved the success rates of the instruction-tuned Gemini Pro model from 51\% to 69.4\% on MATH500 and from 86.4\% to 93.6\% on GSM8K. Similarly, we boosted the success rates of Gemma2 27B from 42.3\% to 58.2\% on MATH500 and from 74.0\% to 92.2\% on GSM8K. The entire process operates without any human intervention or supervision, making our method both financially and ...

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 16 method 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

LLMs Improving LLMs: Agentic Discovery for Test-Time Scaling

cs.CL · 2026-05-08 · conditional · novelty 8.0 · 2 refs

AutoTTS discovers width-depth test-time scaling controllers through agentic search in a pre-collected trajectory environment, yielding better accuracy-cost tradeoffs than hand-designed baselines on math reasoning tasks at low cost.

Step-by-Step Optimization-like Reasoning in LLMs over Expanding Search Spaces

cs.AI · 2026-06-03 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Introduces OPT* tasks and two training regimes (solver-guided online policy optimization with rank-based reward shaping and search-based offline RL) plus a theoretical link between search success and information extraction per budget unit, showing empirical gains in optimization-like reasoning.

Unsupervised Process Reward Models

cs.LG · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Unsupervised PRMs derived from LLM probabilities achieve up to 15% better error detection than LLM judges and match supervised PRMs in verification and RL tasks.

Verifiable Counterfactual Supervision for Process Reward Models

cs.AI · 2026-05-04 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Presents verifiable counterfactual process supervision that generates annotated trajectories via template-aware error injection on symbolic chains, improving Best-of-8 reranking on logical reasoning benchmarks with preliminary math transfer.

Self-Distilled RLVR

cs.LG · 2026-04-03 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

RLSD mixes self-distillation for token-level policy difference magnitudes with RLVR for reliable update directions from response correctness to reach higher convergence and better training stability.

CATPO: Critique-Augmented Tree Policy Optimization

cs.CL · 2026-06-06 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

CATPO introduces an informativeness score F(T) and critique-guided healing for failed trees to improve efficiency and performance in tree-based RLVR, reaching 37.5% macro accuracy on math benchmarks.

ThoughtFold: Folding Reasoning Chains via Introspective Preference Learning

cs.AI · 2026-06-02 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

ThoughtFold applies introspective redundancy detection within correct CoT trajectories to create sub-trajectory spectra, then uses masked preference optimization to penalize redundant explorations, yielding 56% token reduction on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B while preserving accuracy.

SDR: Set-Distance Rewards for Radiology Report Generation

cs.AI · 2026-05-30 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Set-to-set distances on sentence embeddings provide a permutation-invariant reward signal that improves GRPO training and enables efficient test-time scaling for vision-language models generating chest X-ray reports.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 63 citing papers.