pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks

Canonical reference. 76% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

53 Pith papers citing it
Background 76% of classified citations
abstract

Agent Skills are structured packages of procedural knowledge that augment LLM agents at inference time. Despite rapid adoption, there is no standard way to measure whether they actually help. We present SkillsBench, a benchmark of 86 tasks across 11 domains paired with curated Skills and deterministic verifiers. Each task is evaluated under three conditions: no Skills, curated Skills, and self-generated Skills. We test 7 agent-model configurations over 7,308 trajectories. Curated Skills raise average pass rate by 16.2 percentage points(pp), but effects vary widely by domain (+4.5pp for Software Engineering to +51.9pp for Healthcare) and 16 of 84 tasks show negative deltas. Self-generated Skills provide no benefit on average, showing that models cannot reliably author the procedural knowledge they benefit from consuming. Focused Skills with 2--3 modules outperform comprehensive documentation, and smaller models with Skills can match larger models without them.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 13 dataset 2 baseline 1 other 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Agent Skills are structured packages of procedural knowledge that augment LLM agents at inference time. Despite rapid adoption, there is no standard way to measure whether they actually help. We present SkillsBench, a benchmark of 86 tasks across 11 domains paired with curated Skills and deterministic verifiers. Each task is evaluated under three conditions: no Skills, curated Skills, and self-generated Skills. We test 7 agent-model configurations over 7,308 trajectories. Curated Skills raise average pass rate by 16.2 percentage points(pp), but effects vary widely by domain (+4.5pp for Softwar

co-cited works

years

2026 53

representative citing papers

ContractBench: Can LLM Agents Preserve Observation Contracts?

cs.SE · 2026-05-17 · conditional · novelty 7.0

ContractBench shows that LLM agents frequently violate observation contracts by using expired artifacts or corrupting their byte integrity, with no model exceeding 80% success and notable scaling irregularities across families.

Maestro: Reinforcement Learning to Orchestrate Hierarchical Model-Skill Ensembles

cs.LG · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Maestro uses outcome-based RL to train a lightweight policy that orchestrates ensembles of frozen expert models and skills, reporting 70.1% average accuracy across ten multimodal benchmarks and outperforming GPT-5 and Gemini-2.5-Pro while generalizing to unseen components.

Ratchet: A Minimal Hygiene Recipe for Self-Evolving LLM Agents

cs.AI · 2026-05-21 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Ratchet provides a minimal hygiene recipe for self-managing skill libraries in frozen LLM agents, delivering +0.328 rolling-mean pass@1 gain on MBPP+ hard-100 and +0.22 peak lift on SWE-bench Verified.

The Scaling Laws of Skills in LLM Agent Systems

cs.CL · 2026-05-15 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Empirical analysis across 15 LLMs and 1,141 skills identifies a logarithmic routing decay law and a multiplicative execution law coupled by a single fitted slope parameter b that enables targeted library optimizations improving routing accuracy and downstream task pass rates.

SkillMaster: Toward Autonomous Skill Mastery in LLM Agents

cs.AI · 2026-05-09 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

SkillMaster enables LLM agents to autonomously develop skills via trajectory review, counterfactual evaluation, and DualAdv-GRPO training, boosting success rates by 8.8% on ALFWorld and 9.3% on WebShop.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 53 citing papers.